心房颤动导管消融的地位和进展

心房颤动(房颤)是临床常见的心律失常之一,最大风险是血栓栓塞,常见是脑卒中。随着人口的老龄化,房颤人数持续增加,治疗问题也逐渐成为人们关注重点。房颤导管消融是其重要治疗方法之一,可明显改善房颤患者预后。且随着技术发展,消融方法也日趋成熟,故导管消融术治疗房颤地位正在逐步提升。但消融方法尚无固定术式,发生机制尚未完全明确,尤其对于持续房颤。因此房颤消融术仍存在一些问题有待进一步探索。     

Noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial tachycardia after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly encountered after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. But no study exclusively on noncavotricuspid isthmus‐dependent right AT (NCTI‐RAT) post‐AF ablation has been reported. The present study aims to describe its prevalence, electrophysiological mechanisms, and ablation strategy and to further discuss its relationship with AF. Methods: From July 2006 to November 2009, 350 consecutive patients underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. A total of seven patients (2.0%) developed NCTI‐RAT after left atrium ablation for AF. In these highly selected patients (two male, mean age 54 ± 11 years, mean left atrium diameter of 34 ± 7 cm), all had circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in their initial procedures and three of them had additional complex fractionated electrograms ablation in the left atrium and the coronary sinus. Results: Totally, nine NCTI‐RATs were mapped and successfully ablated in the right atrium with a mean cycle length of 273 ± 64 ms in seven patients. Five ATs in three patients were electrophysiologically proved to be macroreentry and the remaining four were focal activation. All the ATs were successfully abolished by catheter ablation. After a mean follow‐up of 29 ± 15 months post‐AT ablation, all patients were free of AT and AF off antiarrhythmic drugs. Conclusions: NCTI‐RAT is relatively less common post‐AF ablation. Totally, 2.0% of paroxysmal AF patients were revealed to have NCTI‐RAT. (PACE 2011; 34:391–397)     

Percutaneous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with important morbidity and mortality. Antiarrhythmic therapy is recommended as initial therapy but is associated with modest efficacy and significant side effects. Over the past several years, catheter ablation has been demonstrated to provide effective and safe curative therapy for atrial fibrillation. Future investigations will assess advances in catheter ablation technology and will help to define the precise role of catheter ablation relative to alternative therapies, such as rate-control and antiarrhythmic therapy.     

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

The use of blanking periods, the immediate period postablation during which transient tachyarrhythmia episodes are not considered recurrences, has been predicated on the assumption that not all early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERAT) will lead to later recurrences and, as such, does not necessarily represent treatment failure. While ERAT can be expected to occur in approximately 38% of patients within the first 3 months of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, only half of these patients will manifest later recurrences. Clinical features related to the patient's history of AF, the index ablation procedure, and particularities of the ERAT can help identify patients at higher risk of later recurrence in whom aggressive attempts to control rhythm, including early cardioversion and reintervention, may be justified.     

Clinical relevance and management of early recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Evaluation of: Malasana G, Day JD, Weiss JP et al. A strategy of rapid cardioversion minimizes the significance of early recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after ablation for atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540–8167.2010.02005.x (2011) (Epub ahead of print).

Early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias are frequent and have been reported in up to 50% of patients after radiofrequency catheter ablation. As these arrhythmias do not definitively indicate therapy failure over the long term, this period is also referred to as the ‘blanking’ or ‘therapy stabilization’ period. Nevertheless, early recurrences have been linked to the occurrence of late recurrences after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Treatment strategies aiming at these early recurrences range from conservative management to repeat catheter ablation with controversial results. In this article, we evaluate a recent publication investigating the efficacy of an aggressive rhythm control approach, with the use of prompt electrical cardioversion for early arrhythmia recurrences on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation, and discuss the results in the light of current evidence.     

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: long-term outcomes

The benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can be offset by periprocedural complications such as acute vessel closure and stent thrombosis in the absence of adequate antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy. Additionally, conditions occurring after 30 days post-PCI, such as in-stent restenosis or late stent thrombosis can occur. Excess antithrombotic therapy, on the other hand, carries a risk of major gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding as well as vascular access site bleeding complications. In this review, evidence related to the various pharmacological agents for reduction of stent thrombosis available to clinicians during and after PCI will be explored.     

Comparison of the point-by-point versus catheter dragging technique for curative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation

Background: The relationship between the applied techniques and clinical outcomes after radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We compared the results of ablation by RF delivered via a point‐by‐point versus catheter dragging technique for the treatment of AF. Methods: This study included 66 patients with drug‐refractory AF who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) ablation. A point‐by‐point technique was used in 35 (53%) patients (Group I), and catheter dragging technique in the remaining 31 (47%) patients (Group II). If AF persisted or remained inducible after the PV isolation, additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and linear ablation were performed. Results: Significantly, fewer RF applications were delivered in Group II than in Group I. The total RF energy duration delivered was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.55). However, the total energy of RF deliveries was significantly greater in Group II than in Group I (P = 0.02). Despite a longer fluoroscopic exposure time (P = 0.01), the total procedural duration was significantly shorter in Group II than in Group I (P = 0.005). Within 3 months after a single ablation procedure, 24 patients (69%) in Group I versus 13 patients (42%) in Group II had ≥1 recurrence(s) of atrial tachyarrhythmias (P = 0.03). A multivariate analysis showed that a point‐by‐point ablation was the only independent predictor of early atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Conclusions: The catheter dragging technique for ablation of AF was associated with a lower early recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmias than the point‐by‐point technique. (PACE 2011; 15–22)     

Quality-of-life in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: results of long-term follow-up

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) significantly impairs patients' quality-of-life (QOL). The effect on QOL of recently developed ablation techniques with curative intention has not been studied. Thirty patients (21 men, age 54.1 +/- 9.5 years) with PAF (duration 5.6 +/- 5.2 years) who failed antiarrhythmic (3.8 +/- 1.2 trials) drug therapy underwent catheter ablation. The follow-up time was 33.9 +/- 11 months. QOL was assessed preablation, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 36 months after catheter ablation. The Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form (SF-36), scored on a 0-100 scale for each of eight domains: bodily pain, general health, mental health, physical functioning, role-emotional, role-physical, social functioning, and vitality, was used. Simultaneously, patients filled out a symptom-specific checklist (SSC) with seven clinical items scored 1-4 (1 best): dyspnea, nausea, palpitations, anxiety, syncope, presyncope, and NYHA classification. Patients with successful catheter ablation had a significant benefit in seven of eight subscales while patients with recurrence had an impact on QOL in two of eight subscales. Using SSC, a successful ablation influenced scores in all seven items while patients with recurrence had a significant change of clinical symptoms in only one item, anxiety. The subscales of the study group compared to a healthy population show higher scores after 24 months of follow-up. Patients with PAF experience a significant improvement in QOL after a successful catheter ablation. In contrast, in patients with recurrence of PAF the QOL showed improvement to a lesser extent and patients experienced ongoing symptoms.     

Left atrial flutter after segmental ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation

Segmental ostial ablation to electrically isolate pulmonary veins has been performed for atrial fibrillation. Left atrial flutter that utilized a critical isthmus adjacent to the ostium of the left superior pulmonary vein was diagnosed and successfully ablated in a patient 3 months after a successful pulmonary vein isolation procedure. Documenting the cause of symptoms after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation is critical in guiding therapy.     

Different clinical courses and predictors of atrial fibrillation occurrence after transisthmic ablation in patients with preablation lone atrial flutter, coexistent atrial fibrillation, and drug induced atrial flutter

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the long-term follow-up after transisthmic ablation of patients with preablation lone atrial flutter, coexistent AF, and drug induced atrial flutter to determine if postablation AF followed a different clinical course and displayed different predictors in these groups. The study evaluated 357 patients who underwent transisthmic ablation for typical atrial flutter. These were divided into four groups according to their preablation history. Group A included patients with typical atrial flutter and without preablation AF (n=120, 33.6%). Group B included patients with preablation AF and spontaneous atrial flutter (n=132, 37.0%). Group C patients had preablation AF and atrial flutter induced by treatment with IC drugs (propafenone or flecainide) (n=63, 17.6%) Group D included patients with preablation AF and atrial flutter induced by treatment with amiodarone (n=42, 11.8%). During a mean follow-up of 15.2 double dagger 10.6 months (range 6-55 months) AF occurred more frequently in groups B (56.1%) and C (57.1%) patients than in groups A (20.8%, P <0.0001) and D (31.0%, P <0.0001) patients. The results of multivariate analysis revealed that different clinical and echocardiographical variables were correlated with postablation AF occurrence in the different groups. Patients with atrial flutter induced by amiodarone have a significantly lower risk of postablation AF than patients with spontaneous atrial flutter and AF, and those with atrial flutter induced by IC drugs. Different clinical and echocardiographical variables predict postablation AF occurrence in different subgroups of patients.     

Sinus node injury as a result of superior vena cava isolation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Background: The ectopic foci originating from superior vena cava (SVC) may act as triggers in the occurrence and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Unfortunately, the SVC isolation may result in potential dysfunction of sinus node. Furthermore, little is known about the occurrence of sinus node injury complicated by the SVC isolation. Methods: Patients with AF or atypical atrial flutter experienced SVC isolation. The junctional rhythm or sinus arrest could be observed, if sinus node was injured. Atropin and dopamine administration ruled out the vagal irritation of sinus node, when junctional rhythm or sinus arrest occurred. Results: One hundred and thirty‐two patients who had no electrocardiogram signs of sinus node dysfunction before ablation experienced the SVC isolation. Six patients (three men, three women, mean age 62.5 ± 8.6 years) had sinus node injury (4.5%, 6/132): four patients had junctional rhythm and one male patient had junctional rhythm and sinus arrest simultaneously; another male patient required AAI mode permanent pacemaker implantation due to the persistent junctional rhythm after SVC isolation. The ablation sites of all six patients closed to the junction of right atrium and SVC during the ablation of anterolateral free wall of the SVC. Conclusion: Sinus node may be damaged due to the ablation sites closer to sinus node. The definition of the junction of right atrium and SVC is very important, the ablation sites of anterolateral free wall of the SVC should not be too close to the SVC orifice. (PACE 2011; 34:163–170)