Perceived Short- and Long-Term Effects of Bereavement Support Group Participation at the Hospice of Petaluma

Fatigue is a symptom that is frequently found in chronic pain patients with low back pain and/or neck pain. At the present time, no specific psychopharmacological treatment for this problem has been identified. Modafinil is a wakefulness-promoting agent that the FDA has approved for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. There have been reports on the use of modafinil for the treatment of fatigue in various neurological syndromes. This literature is reviewed. As such, modafinil treatment was initiated for a patient with severe fatigue associated with chronic low back pain and neck pain. There was dramatic improvement in fatigue and associated function. This case is described. It is the first such case report in the literature. The significance of this finding to the treatment of pain-associated fatigue is discussed.     

Multimodale Therapie bei chronischem HWS- und LWS-Schmerz

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy has been established for patients with chronic low back pain, but studies reporting results in patients with chronic neck pain are rare. METHODS: This prospective clinical study compared the results in 97 patients with chronic cervical pain and 231 patients with chronic lumbar pain after three weeks of multimodal therapy. The following factors were analyzed in both groups at the beginning and after 6 months: ability to work, pain intensity and functional back capacity. RESULTS: Both groups had improved significantly after 6 months in all outcome parameters. Functional back capacity and ability to work at 6 months were not different between the two groups, but pain intensity was significantly lower in patients with low back pain compared to patients with neck pain. CONCLUSION: Multimodal therapy is also an efficient treatment strategy for patients with chronic cervical pain as has already been shown for patients with chronic lumbar pain.     

Epidural steroid injections for low back pain

Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has been used as a treatment for low back pain for over 50 years. In the last 10 to 15 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of ESIs for the treatment of low back pain and radicular pain without clear improvements in outcomes. Recent literature has focused on the use of ESIs as treatment for radicular pain associated with low back pain, with some studies showing benefit over control groups for limb symptoms. There is a lack of literature, however, to support the use of ESIs for the treatment of axial low back pain. The theoretical basis for their use, technical considerations, and the literature available for different approaches of access to the epidural space as pertaining to the treatment for low back pain without radiculopathy are reviewed.     

Effectiveness of massage therapy for chronic, non-malignant pain: a review

Previous reviews of massage therapy for chronic, non-malignant pain have focused on discrete pain conditions. This article aims to provide a broad overview of the literature on the effectiveness of massage for a variety of chronic, non-malignant pain complaints to identify gaps in the research and to inform future clinical trials. Computerized databases were searched for relevant studies including prior reviews and primary trials of massage therapy for chronic, non-malignant pain. Existing research provides fairly robust support for the analgesic effects of massage for non-specific low back pain, but only moderate support for such effects on shoulder pain and headache pain. There is only modest, preliminary support for massage in the treatment of fibromyalgia, mixed chronic pain conditions, neck pain and carpal tunnel syndrome. Thus, research to date provides varying levels of evidence for the benefits of massage therapy for different chronic pain conditions. Future studies should employ rigorous study designs and include follow-up assessments for additional quantification of the longer-term effects of massage on chronic pain.     

Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain. Randomised clinical trials evaluating specific stabilisation exercise were identified and retrieved. Outcomes were disability, pain, return to work, number of episodes, global perceived effect, or health-related quality of life. A single trial reported that specific stabilisation exercise was more effective than no treatment but not more effective than spinal manipulative therapy for the management of cervicogenic headache and associated neck pain. Single trials reported that specific stabilisation exercise was effective for pelvic pain and for prevention of recurrence after an acute episode of low back pain but not to reduce pain or disability associated with acute low back pain. Pooled analyses revealed that, for chronic low back pain, specific stabilisation exercise was superior to usual medical care and education but not to manipulative therapy, and no additional effect was found when specific stabilisation exercise was added to a conventional physiotherapy program. A single trial reported that specific stabilisation exercise and a surgical procedure to reduce pain and disability in chronic low back pain were equally effective. The available evidence suggests that specific stabilisation exercise is effective in reducing pain and disability in chronic but not acute low back pain. Single trials indicate that specific stabilisation exercise can be helpful in the treatment of cervicogenic headache and associated neck pain, pelvic pain, and in reducing recurrence after acute low back pain.     

Therapeutic exercise in chronic neck and back pain.

Research regarding the effect of exercise on chronic benign axial pain is reviewed. Both chronic low back pain (LBP) and chronic neck pain are associated with weakness of the trunk and neck musculature; however, it is unknown whether weakness is a cause or effect. The relationship between incoordination of the neck or trunk musculature and chronic pain is unclear. Exercise is associated with improved strength and endurance and decreased pain in subjects with LBP but the literature is very sparse with respect to chronic neck pain. Range-of-motion is also diminished in those with LBP and improves with exercise, and is associated with abatement in symptoms. No evidence could be found regarding the effect of exercise on segmental motion. Exercise is also associated with improved function, however the mechanism whereby either pain report or function improves is unclear. A greater understanding of the role of exercise will require more specific studies of strength, coordination, motion, function, and pain.     

Factors predicting pain reduction in chronic back and neck pain after multimodal treatment

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment related pain reduction on the short- and long-term is predicted by different baseline variables, and with different accuracy, in patients with chronic low back pain as compared with those with chronic neck pain. DESIGN AND METHODS: A single blinded prospective cohort study based on patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in the lower back (N = 167) or the neck (N = 136) who completed a 4-week multimodal rehabilitation program. At admission, each patient was evaluated on 17 potential predictors, including pain characteristics and physical, sociodemographic, and psychosocial-behavioral variables. Changes in self-reported pain intensity in the lower back or the neck between the pretreatment evaluation and those performed immediately after, and 12 months after the rehabilitation program, were assessed. RESULTS: Logistic regression models revealed that change in pain intensity could be predicted with good specificity but with poor sensitivity both for patients with chronic low back pain and chronic neck pain. Significant predictors among the neck pain patients were high endurance, low age, high pain intensity, few other symptoms, low need of being social, to do things with others, and to be helped, along with optimistic attitudes on how the pain will interfere with daily life. Among the low back pain patients, high pain intensity, low levels of pain severity, and high affective distress were important predictors. Variables such as sex, sick leave history, working status, accident, pain duration, and depressive symptoms demonstrated no predictive value. Short- and long-term pain outcome was equally predictable and predicted by almost the same variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who reported unchanged or increased pain after multimodal treatment could be predicted with good accuracy, whereas those who reported decreased pain were more difficult to identify. Treatment-related pain alteration in chronic low back pain seems to be predicted by partly different variables than in chronic neck pain.     

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a case study

Pain is a widespread issue in the United States. Nine of 10 Americans regularly suffer from pain, and nearly every person will experience low back pain at one point in their lives. Undertreated or unrelieved pain costs more than $60 billion a year from decreased productivity, lost income, and medical expenses. The ability to diagnose and provide appropriate medical treatment is imperative. This case study examines a 23-year-old Active Duty woman who is preparing to be involuntarily released from military duty for an easily correctable medical condition. She has complained of chronic low back pain that radiates into her hip and down her leg since experiencing a work-related injury. She has been seen by numerous providers for the previous 11 months before being referred to the chronic pain clinic. Upon the first appointment to the chronic pain clinic, she has been diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. This case study will demonstrate the importance of a quality lower back pain assessment.     

Evidence for the Use of Botulinum Toxin in the Chronic Pain Setting—A Review of the Literature

▪ Abstract:   A significant proportion of chronic pain is of musculoskeletal origin. Botulinum toxin (BTX) has been successfully used in the treatment of spasmodic torticollis, limb dystonia, and spasticity. Investigators have, thus, become interested in its potential use in treating many chronic pain conditions. Practitioners have used BTX, outside the product license, in the treatment of refractory myofascial pain syndrome and neck and low back pain (LBP). This article reviews the current evidence relating to chronic pain practice. There is evidence supporting the use of both BTX type A and type B in the treatment of cervical dystonias. The weight of evidence is in favor of BTX type A as a treatment in: pelvic pain, plantar fasciitis, temporomandibular joint dysfunction associated facial pain, chronic LBP, carpal tunnel syndrome, joint pain, and in complex regional pain syndrome and selected neuropathic pain syndromes. The weight of evidence is also in favor of BTX type A and type B in piriformis syndrome. There is conflicting evidence relating to the use of BTX in the treatment whiplash, myofascial pain, and myogenous jaw pain. It does appear that BTX is useful in selected patients, and its duration of action may exceed that of conventional treatments. This seems a promising treatment that must be further evaluated. ▪     

Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain

OBJECTIVE: This study measured functional capacity and subjective pain in patients with chronic neck pain before and after manipulation of the cervical spine. DESIGN: Outcomes study on 16 patients with chronic neck pain. BACKGROUND: Muscle inhibition, i.e., the inability to fully activate a muscle, has been observed following joint pathologies and in low back pain conditions. Although chronic neck pain has been associated with changes in muscle recruitment and coordination in the shoulder and arms, the possibility of muscle inhibition has not been explored. METHODS: Biceps activation during a maximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction was assessed using the interpolated twitch technique and electromyography. Cervical range of motion and pressure pain thresholds were measured using a goniometer and an algometer. Manipulation of the cervical spine was applied at the level of C5/6/7, and functional assessments were repeated. RESULTS: Patients showed significant inhibition in their biceps muscles. Cervical range of motion was restricted laterally, and increased pressure pain sensitivity was evident. After cervical spine manipulation, a significant reduction in biceps inhibition and an increase in biceps force occurred. Cervical range of motion and pressure pain thresholds increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Significant dysfunction in biceps activation was evident in patients with chronic neck pain, indicating that this muscle group cannot be used to the full extent. Spinal manipulation decreased muscle inhibition and increased elbow flexor strength at least in the short term. RELEVANCE: Muscle inhibition in the biceps has not been previously documented in patients with chronic neck pain. Further research is needed to establish whether muscle inhibition is related to clinical symptoms and functional outcome. Spinal manipulation improved muscle function, cervical range of motion and pain sensitivity, and might therefore be beneficial for treating patients with chronic neck pain.     

Botulinum toxin A and musculoskeletal pain]

INTRODUCTION: Relaxant muscle properties and pain relieve effectiveness in neurological spasmodic disorders of botulinum toxin A (BTXA) suggested its relevance to relieve musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this article was to collect literature data and to assess the different analgesia indications of BTXA proposed in the treatment of musculoskeletal pains. METHOD: The international literature was carried out with the Medline data bank using keywords toxin and pain. Only clinical trials have been analysed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventeen articles were collected and 12 clinical trials were retained. They are focused on 4 chronic diseases, neck pain, tennis elbow, Piriformis syndrome and low back pain. Results of the 6 chronic neck pain studies are contradictory and emphasize the difficulty to display a satisfactory analgesia effect of BTXA in this indication. Results of the studies concerning other indications (tennis elbow, Piriformis syndrome and low back pain) seem to be more effective and clinically pertinent. DISCUSSION: Analgesia BTXA effect seems to be conditioned by the presence of an objective muscular spasm or stringy disease inducing musculoskeletal pain. CONCLUSION: The first data concerning use of BTXA to treat musculoskeletal pains are few and are worth specifying by other studies.     

A prospective analysis of stress and fatigue in recurrent low back pain

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether patients with recurrent low back pain display a different pattern of mood fluctuations across days than matched healthy controls and whether these mood states are related to pain occurrence and/or magnitude using a prospective design. The questions addressed are whether mood states prior to a pain episode are associated with the episode or whether mood relates to pain as a secondary reaction. Similarly, the relationship between mood state recorded prior to, during or following pain and magnitude of pain experienced was investigated. Thirty-three ambulatory chronic low back pain patients and an equivalent group of asymptomatic controls matched for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and reported activity level monitored mood state (anxiety, tension, depression, anger, vigor, fatigue, confusion) and pain before breakfast, at 4 p.m. and at bedtime for 14 consecutive days. Groups were successfully matched. Analyses revealed significantly higher levels of tension, anxiety and fatigue and lower levels of vigor in the pain cases. No mood state was predictive of pain onset but fatigue was associated with pain 24 h following pain, indicating fatigue as secondary to pain. While mood state recorded prior to or following pain was unable to predict magnitude of pain, fatigue was associated with the level of pain experienced during the pain episode itself. The findings reveal a pattern of anxiety, tension and fatigue where fatigue is associated with increased pain during the pain episode and is increased 24 h following pain. This fatigue-pain relationship is superimposed upon a continuous elevation of anxiety and tension. These findings suggest the importance of pain management efforts directed at decreasing patients' fatigue levels, and increasing functional endurance while simultaneously reducing anxiety. The results also question the role of negative mood states in the initiation or exacerbation of pain and highlights the influence of physical mood states such as fatigue on pain in low back pain.     

Low back pain: pharmacologic management

Adequate treatment of low back pain is essential, but has been challenging for many primary care physicians. Most patients with low back pain can be treated in the primary care environment, provided the physician has enough knowledge of the medications used to treat low back pain. The main treatment goal for acute low back pain is to control the pain and maintain function. For patients with chronic back pain, the goal is continual pain management and prevention of future exacerbations. This article reviews current pharmacological options for the treatment of low back pain, and possible future innovations.     

Role of Alternative Therapies for Chronic Pain Syndromes

There is increasing interest in the use of complimentary and alternative medicine (CAM) for the treatment of chronic pain. This review examines alternative and complimentary therapies, which can be incorporated as part of a biopsychosocial approach in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. In the present investigation, literature from articles indexed on PubMed was evaluated including topics of alternative therapies, complimentary therapies, pain psychology, biofeedback therapy, physical exercise therapies, acupuncture, natural and herbal supplements, whole-body cryotherapy, and smartphone technologies in the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. This review highlights the key role of psychology in the treatment of chronic pain. Cognitive behavior therapy appears to be the most impactful while biofeedback therapy has also been shown to be effective for chronic pain. Exercise therapy has been shown to be effective in short-, intermediate-, and long-term pain states. When compared to that in sham controls, acupuncture has shown some benefit for neck pain immediately after the procedure and in the short term and improvement has also been demonstrated in the treatment of headaches. The role of smartphones and whole-body cryotherapy are new modalities and further studies are needed. Recent literature suggests that several alternate therapies could play a role in the treatment of chronic pain, supporting the biopsychosocial model in the treatment of pain states.     

Patient Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Chronic Low Back Pain and Chronic Neck Pain

Many recommended nonpharmacologic therapies for patients with chronic spinal pain require visits to providers such as acupuncturists and chiropractors. Little information is available to inform third-party payers’ coverage policies regarding ongoing use of these therapies. This study offers contingent valuation-based estimates of patient willingness to pay (WTP) for pain reductions from a large (n = 1,583) sample of patients using ongoing chiropractic care to manage their chronic low back and neck pain. Average WTP estimates were $45.98 (45.8) per month per 1-point reduction in current pain for chronic low back pain and $37.32 (38.0) for chronic neck pain. These estimates met a variety of validity checks including that individuals’ values define a downward-sloping demand curve for these services. Comparing these WTP estimates with patients’ actual use of chiropractic care over the next 3 months indicates that these patients are likely “buying” perceived pain reductions from what they believe their pain would have been if they didn't see their chiropractor—that is, they value maintenance of their current mild pain levels. These results provide some evidence for copay levels and their relationship to patient demand, but call into question ongoing coverage policies that require the documentation of continued improvement or of experienced clinical deterioration with treatment withdrawal.PerspectiveThis study provides estimates of reported WTP for pain reduction from a large sample of patients using chiropractic care to manage their chronic spinal pain and compares these estimates to what these patients do for care over the next 3 months, to inform coverage policies for ongoing care.     

Back pain and neck pain in four general practices

This study records the incidence with which married men and their wives attended four general practices with low back and neck pain.There was a higher attendance with low back pain, but not neck pain, for those men engaged in heavy manual work. Both men and women attending with back pain also attended more frequently with other conditions than those without back pain. A high proportion of the wives of the men who attended frequently were themselves low attenders.There was a high correlation between the low back and neck pain attendance, especially amongst the men. There was a considerable variation in the methods of management of these conditions between the four practices.     

Microcurrent therapy: a novel treatment method for chronic low back myofascial pain

Chronic low back pain associated with myofascial trigger point activity has been historically refractory to conventional treatment (Pain Research and Management 7 (2002) 81). In this case series study, an analysis of 22 patients with chronic low back pain, of 8.8 years average duration, is presented. Following treatment with frequency-specific microcurrent, a statistically significant 3.8-fold reduction in pain intensity was observed using a visual analog scale. This outcome was achieved over an average treatment period of 5.6 weeks and a visit frequency of one treatment per week. When pain chronicity exceeded 5 years, there was a trend toward increasing frequency of treatment required to achieve the same magnitude of pain relief.In 90% of these patients, other treatment modalities including drug therapy, chiropractic manipulation, physical therapy, naturopathic treatment and acupuncture had failed to produce equivalent benefits. The microcurrent treatment was the single factor contributing the most consistent difference in patient-reported pain relief.These results support the observation that rigorously designed clinical investigations are warranted.     

Should chiropractors recommend provocative discography for diagnostic purposes in patients with chronic low back pain?

This paper presents a narrative literature review of provocative discography in chronic low back pain. The literature concerning accuracy and utility, complications, alternatives and use of provocative discography as a determinant for fusion surgery was reviewed. The conclusion is that, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to warrant the recommendation of provocative discography by chiropractors for chronic low back pain patients. There are safer, less costly, less invasive alternatives to discography that show promise and further investigation of the utility of these methods is recommended.     

A cognitive-behavioural programme for the management of low back pain in primary care: a description and justification of the intervention used in the Back Skills Training Trial (BeST; ISRCTN 54717854)

A multicentre randomised controlled trial has been commissioned to evaluate cognitive-behavioural (CB) approaches in the management of subacute and chronic low back pain in primary care. This paper describes the development of the CB intervention based on best-available evidence. Several methods were used to design the intervention. Risk factors for the development of chronic low back pain were identified from the literature to provide targets for treatment, essential components of a CB intervention were considered using the CB treatment model, and the optimal delivery method was used to balance clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness within primary care.