Pre-hospital and hospital delay in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in tertiary care

Background

Early presentation is desirable in all cases of acute prolonged chest pain. Causes of delayed presentation vary widely across geographic regions because of different patients' profile and different healthcare capabilities.

Acute coronary syndromes in patients with prior cerebrovascular events: lessons from the Euro-Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of prior cerebrovascular events (CE) among patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to compare the clinical characteristics, clinical course, treatment, and outcomes of patients with ACS with and without a prior CE.

Methods and results

We prospectively enrolled 10,484 patients with ACS in 103 hospitals in 25 countries across Europe and the Mediterranean basin. A prior CE was reported in 254 of 4338 patients (5.9%) with ST elevation, 420 of 5215 patients (8.1%) without ST elevation, and 92 of 663 patients (13.9%) with an undetermined electrocardiographic pattern. In general, patients with a prior CE were older, more likely to be females and nonsmokers, more commonly had prior myocardial infarction, heart failure, bypass surgery, and were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, and renal failure. While in the hospital, they had more heart failure, and they were more likely to receive warfarin, digoxin, diuretics and calcium-channel blockers, and less likely to receive antiplatelet agents, β-blockers, and statins. The inhospital mortality rates were 9.1% (with a prior CE) versus 6.4% (without a prior CE) for patients with ACS with ST elevation; 5.0% versus 2.0% for patients with ACS with non-ST elevation; and 14.1% versus 10.7% for patients with ACS with undetermined electrocardiographic results. The adjusted risk (95% CI) of inhospital death for patients with a prior CE was 1.12 (0.70, 1.81), 1.79 (1.06, 3.00), and 0.92 (0.44, 1.94) for ST-elevation ACS, non-ST-elevation ACS, and ACS with undetermined electrocardiogram, respectively. The P value for interaction between prior CE and the type of ACS on outcome was .10.

Conclusions

Patients with a prior CE constitute 7.5% of patients with ACS and have high-risk features. A prior CE is associated with increased inhospital mortality, particularly in patients with with non-ST-elevation ACS.     

Acute coronary syndromes in patients with renal failure

As the rates of obesity and diabetes continue to rise sharply in the United States, there is a secondary epidemic of diabetic nephropathy, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with renal disease. Many sources of information support the concept that the metabolic condition caused by renal failure is an independent cardiac risk factor with a direct relationship to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), heart failure, and arrhythmias. An estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² has consistently been shown to be the most powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in ACS. This paper focuses on ACS and highlights the major issues with respect to diagnosis and treatment in patients with underlying renal failure. Because patients with renal disease are routinely excluded from clinical trials of ACS, we draw upon a variety of clinical data sets to gather an evidenced-based approach to this important and growing population of patients.     

Impact of aspirin on presentation and hospital outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE])

The long-term use of aspirin (ASA) reduces the risk of subsequent acute coronary syndromes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It is less clear whether ASA therapy benefits patients who develop an acute coronary syndrome despite its use. Baseline characteristics, type of acute coronary syndrome, and in-hospital events were compared on the basis of previous use of ASA in 11,388 patients with and without a history of CAD presenting to 94 multinational hospitals. A total of 73.0% of patients with a history of CAD (n = 4,974) were previously on long-term ASA therapy compared with 19.4% of patients without a history of CAD (n = 6,414). After multivariate regression analysis controlling for various potentially confounding factors, patients with a history of CAD who were previously taking ASA were significantly less likely to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.44 to 0.61) or die during hospitalization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.95) in comparison to patients who were not taking ASA. Patients without a history of CAD and who were previously taking ASA also had a lower risk of developing ST-segment elevation MI (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.40) and a trend toward a decreased hospital death rate (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.07). These results demonstrate that patients with a history of CAD who present with an acute coronary syndrome despite prior ASA use have less severe clinical presentation, fewer hospital complications, and lower in-hospital death rates than patients not previously taking ASA.     

Implications of diabetes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events

BACKGROUND: There are limited data describing the presenting characteristics, management, and outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in these factors, patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and unstable angina were enrolled in a large multinational coronary disease registry. METHODS: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events is a prospective observational study of patients hospitalized with an ACS at 94 hospitals in 14 countries. The study sample consisted of 5403 patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, 4725 with non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and 5988 with unstable angina. RESULTS: Approximately 1 in 4 patients presented to participating hospitals with a history of diabetes. Patients with diabetes were older, more often women, with a greater prevalence of comorbidities, and they were less likely to be treated with effective cardiac therapies than nondiabetic patients. Patients with diabetes who developed an ACS were at increased risk for each hospital outcome examined including heart failure, renal failure, cardiogenic shock, and death. These differences remained after adjustment for potentially confounding prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of patients with an ACS has diabetes and is at increased risk for adverse outcomes compared with patients without diabetes. There are certain proven therapeutic strategies that remain underused in the diabetic population. A more widespread awareness of this increased risk and a more diligent use of proven cardiac treatment approaches are indicated for patients with diabetes who develop an ACS.     

Elevated leukocyte count and adverse hospital events in patients with acute coronary syndromes: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)

Objective

To examine the association between elevated leukocyte count and hospital mortality and heart failure in patients enrolled in the multinational, observational Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

Background

Elevated leukocyte count is associated with adverse hospital outcomes in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The association of this prognostic factor with hospital mortality and heart failure in patients with other acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unclear.

Methods

We examined the association between admission leukocyte count and hospital mortality and heart failure in 8269 patients presenting with an ACS. This association was examined separately in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI, non-ST-segment elevation AMI, and unstable angina. Leukocyte count was divided into 4 mutually exclusive groups (Q): Q1 <6000, Q2 = 6000-9999, Q3 = 10,000-11,999, Q4 >12,000. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between elevated leukocyte count and hospital events while accounting for the simultaneous effect of several potentially confounding variables.

Results

Increasing leukocyte count was significantly associated with hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.6 for Q4 compared to Q2 [normal range]) and heart failure (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.2-3.4) for patients presenting with ACS. This association was seen in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI (OR for hospital death 3.2, 95% CI 2.1-4.7; OR for heart failure 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.3), non-ST-segment elevation AMI (OR for hospital death 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0; OR for heart failure 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5), or unstable angina (OR for hospital death 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.5; OR for heart failure 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.4).

Conclusion

In men and women of all ages with the spectrum of ACS, initial leukocyte count is an independent predictor of hospital death and the development of heart failure.     

Acute coronary syndromes in patients with angiographically normal or near normal (non-obstructive) coronary arteries

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with normal or near-normal (non-obstructive) coronary arteries (ACSNNOCA) constitute an important, albeit heterogeneous, patient subset of younger patients, more commonly females, who may have lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to patients with obstructive coronary artery disease; however this risk remains substantial, hence needing further investigation to identify the underlying cause and devise a proper therapeutic strategy. A diagnostic algorithm starts during coronary angiography with some essential additional diagnostic steps, such as a left ventricular angiogram that may readily identify the underlying cause, e.g. Takotsubo syndrome, while intravascular imaging and vascular reactivity testing may need to be considered for assessing other diagnostic possibilities (e.g. occult atherosclerotic plaque rupture, spontaneous coronary dissection or microvascular dysfunction). Nevertheless, pursuing further investigation with less risky noninvasive tests, such as echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, may effectively identify the cause of ACSNNOCA (e.g. myocarditis or Takotsubo syndrome), and guide management.     

Treating patients with acute coronary syndromes with aggressive antiplatelet therapy (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events)

Few data exist on the use of aggressive combination therapy with thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in higher risk patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to characterize the combined use of these agents and the associated hospital outcomes in patients with ACS enrolled in the multinational Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Data from 8,081 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina were analyzed. Of these patients, 5,070 (62.7%) received aspirin and a thienopyridine, and the remainder received aspirin, a thienopyridine, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocker. The presence of a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; a history of diabetes or coronary artery bypass surgery; performance of in-hospital catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting; and in-hospital use of heparin were independent predictors of the use of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, thienopyridines, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers. Increased diastolic blood pressure and increased serum creatinine were associated with a failure to prescribe triple therapy. An increased risk of major bleeding during hospitalization was associated with the use of triple antiplatelet therapy (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.2). Aggressive antiplatelet therapy was used in approximately 2 of every 5 patients presenting with an ACS. Triple therapy was associated with the performance of catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, as well as high-risk patient features. Although no differences in hospital death rates were evident in patients receiving triple therapy, this population was at significantly increased risk of major bleeding episodes during hospitalization.     

Acute myocardial infarction: coronary care unit, hospital ward or home management?

The need of admission of all patients with acute myocardial infarction in a CCU is questioned by some british authors. A critical review of their publications stresses the most important methodological problems they could not overcome; consequently they cannot allow any valuable comparison. There are no randomized trial related to the comparison of general ward to CCU care, but the available data obtained by studies based on bed availability show a definite advantage of the CCU. At the present stage of our knowledge, admission in a CCU must be recommended to all patients seen in the first hours after the presumed onset of the disease; after some delay (12 h?) systematic admission is not justified any more and the decision should be taken according to each case, in relation to the clinical status and familial or social conditions.