Phase III randomized intergroup trial of subtotal lymphoid irradiation versus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and subtotal lymphoid irradiation for stage IA to IIA Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: The management of early-stage Hodgkin's disease in the United States is controversial. To evaluate whether staging laparotomy could be safely avoided in early-stage Hodgkin's disease and whether chemotherapy should be a part of the treatment of nonlaparotomy staged patients, a phase III intergroup trial was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred forty-eight patients with clinical stage IA to IIA supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease were randomized without staging laparotomy to treatment with either subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) or combined-modality therapy (CMT) consisting of three cycles of doxorubicin and vinblastine followed by STLI. RESULTS: The study was closed at the second, planned, interim analysis because of a markedly superior failure-free survival (FFS) rate for patients on the CMT arm (94%) compared with the STLI arm (81%). With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 10 patients have experienced relapse or died on the chemoradiotherapy arm, compared with 34 on the radiotherapy arm (P <.001). Few deaths have occurred on either arm (three deaths on CMT and seven deaths on STLI). Treatment was well tolerated, with only one death on each arm attributed to treatment. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that it is possible to obtain a high FFS rate in a large group of stage IA to IIA patients without performing staging laparotomy and that three cycles of chemotherapy plus STLI provide a superior FFS compared with STLI alone. Extended follow-up is necessary to assess freedom from second relapse, overall survival, late toxicities, patterns of treatment failure, and quality of life.     

Seven-year follow-up for energy/vitality outcomes in early stage Hodgkin’s disease patients treated with subtotal lymphoid irradiation versus chemotherapy plus radiation: SWOG S9133 and its QOL companion study,S9208

Purpose

We describe 7 years of follow-up for the energy/vitality outcome in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease patients treated on a randomized clinical trial that compared subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) with combined modality treatment (CMT) (SWOG 9133). Survivorship research questions involved the extent to which symptoms/side effects endured over a follow-up period of 7 years for this early-stage patient group.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-nine patients participated in the quality of life (QOL) companion study (SWOG 9208) and completed the SF-36 vitality scale, SF-36 health perception item, Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form (CARES-SF), and symptom distress scale. This paper reports vitality outcome results obtained from randomization, 6 months, and annually for 7 years. To assess changes in vitality over time, we used linear mixed models with patient as a random effect.

Results

Patients receiving CMT had lower observed vitality at 6 months than did the STLI patients (p?<?.0001). However, beginning at year 1, vitality results did not differ significantly by treatment over the 5-year (p?=?.13) and 7-year (p?=?.16) follow-up periods. Vitality only slightly improved over baseline in either group after treatment. The results were similar after accounting for patterns of recurrence and missing data.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease experience a short-term (at 6 months) decrease in vitality with treatment, which is more severe with CMT, but that after the first year, vitality scores were similar between the two treatment groups. Enduring fatigue results for patients receiving these therapies were not observed.Implications for cancer survivorsThese data provide comprehensive 7-year follow-up vitality information, an important symptom for early-stage lymphoma survivors.

     

Results of a prospective trial of mantle irradiation alone for selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of mantle radiation therapy alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and June 2000, 87 selected patients with pathologic stage (PS) IA to IIA or clinical stage (CS) IA Hodgkin's disease were entered onto a single-arm prospective trial of treatment with mantle irradiation alone. Eighty-three of 87 patients had > or = 1 year of follow-up after completion of mantle irradiation and were included for analysis in this study. Thirty-seven patients had PS IA, 40 had PS IIA, and six had CS IA disease. Histologic distribution was as follows: nodular sclerosis (n = 64), lymphocyte predominant (n = 15), mixed cellularity (n = 3), and unclassified (n = 1). Median follow-up time was 61 months. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rates of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival were 86% and 100%, respectively. Eleven of 83 patients relapsed at a median time of 27 months. Nine of the 11 relapses contained at least a component below the diaphragm. All 11 patients who developed recurrent disease were alive without evidence of Hodgkin's disease at the time of last follow-up. The 5-year FFTF in the 43 stage I patients was 92% compared with 78% in the 40 stage II patients (P =.04). Significant differences in FFTF were not seen by histology (P =.26) or by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer H-5F eligibility (P =.25). CONCLUSION: Mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease is associated with disease control rates comparable to those seen with extended field irradiation. The FFTF is especially favorable among stage I patients.     

Long-term survival and competing causes of death in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease treated at age 50 or younger.

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term survival and the pattern and timing of excess mortality in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1969 and 1997, 1,080 patients age 50 or younger were treated for clinical stage IA to IIB Hodgkin's disease. Overall survival was determined, and prognostic factors were assessed. Relative risk and absolute excess risk (AR) of mortality were calculated for the entire cohort and by prognostic groups (on the basis of B symptoms, mediastinal status, and number of sites, modified from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years. The 15- and 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 84% and 78%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models showed that number of involved sites (P =.006), mediastinal status (P =.02), and histology (P =.02) were independent predictors of death from all causes. The AR of mortality in patients with a favorable prognosis increased over time, whereas for those with an unfavorable prognosis, the AR peaked in the first 5 years, predominantly from Hodgkin's disease. The relative risk of mortality from all causes, causes other than Hodgkin's disease, second tumors, and cardiac disease remained significantly elevated more than 20 years after treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients treated for early-stage Hodgkin's disease have a sustained excess mortality risk despite good control of the disease. Treatment reduction efforts in patients with early-stage, favorable-prognosis disease should continue, but for patients with an unfavorable prognosis, modified treatment may not be advisable. The excess mortality noted beyond two decades underscores the importance of long-term follow-up care in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease.     

Factors influencing treatment recommendations in early-stage Hodgkin's disease: a survey of physicians.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore variation in practice patterns and identify factors associated with physicians' treatment decisions for early-stage Hodgkin's disease. METHODS: We conducted a one-time mail survey of oncologists randomly selected from directories of national oncology societies (n = 207) and Hodgkin's disease experts (n = 147). The survey included questions on (i) physician factors, (ii) preferred treatment choices for six case scenarios of early-stage Hodgkin's disease that varied by patient factors, and (iii) thresholds for changing treatment recommendations. RESULTS: The response rate was 50%. For non-bulky Hodgkin's disease, 69% of respondents chose combined modality therapy (CMT). On multivariate analysis, physician factors that independently predicted for choice of CMT included a high Hodgkin's disease case load (P = 0.02) and a high percentage of patients enrolled in clinical trials (P = 0.05). Radiation oncologists had a lower threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.02). More experience with second malignancy cases and longer time in practice were associated with a higher threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.04 and P = 0.008, respectively). In stratified analyses, treatment decisions of non-experts were significantly influenced by physician factors, but not by patient factors. Conversely, choices of Hodgkin's disease experts were insensitive to all physician factors, but experts were significantly more likely to select chemotherapy alone in young women and CMT in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that physician factors including practice type and experience may in part explain variation in practice pattern for Hodgkin's disease therapy. Hodgkin's disease experts are more likely to tailor therapy according to individual patient factors.     

Decision analysis on alternative treatment strategies for favorable-prognosis, early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of various treatment strategies in early-stage, favorable-prognosis Hodgkin's disease (HD) using methods of decision analysis. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic model to determine the life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy for a hypothetical cohort of clinically or pathologically staged 25-year-old patients with early-stage, favorable-prognosis HD treated with varying degrees of initial therapy. Markov models were used to simulate the lifetime clinical course of patients, and baseline probability estimates were derived from published study results. RESULTS: Among patients with pathologic stage (PS) I to II, mantle and para-aortic (MPA) radiotherapy was favored over combined-modality therapy (CMT), mantle radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 1.18, 1.33, and 1.55 years, respectively. For patients with clinical stage (CS) I to II, the treatment options of MPA-splenic radiotherapy, CMT, and chemotherapy yielded similar survival outcomes. Sensitivity analysis showed that the decision between CMT and MPA-splenic radiotherapy was highly influenced by the precise values of the estimates of treatment efficacy and long-term morbidity, the quality-of-life value assigned to the postsplenic irradiation state, and the time discount value used in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that even if future studies doubled the precision of the estimates of the treatment-related variables, it would be impossible to demonstrate the superiority of one treatment over the other. CONCLUSION: Our model predicted that on average, MPA radiotherapy was clearly the preferred treatment for PS I to II patients. For CS I to II patients the treatment decision is a toss-up between MPA-splenic radiotherapy and CMT, emphasizing the importance of patient preference exploration and shared decision making between patient and physician when choosing between treatments.     

High-dose sequential chemotherapy with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and repeated stem-cell support for inflammatory breast cancer patients: does impact on quality of life jeopardize feasibility and acceptability of treatment?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients enrolled onto the High-Dose Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Study Group trial (PEGASE 02), a French pilot multicenter trial of the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) aimed at evaluating (1) toxicity and feasibility of sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and stem-cell support and (2) response to HDC in terms of pathologic response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: QOL measures were performed at inclusion and four times subsequently up to 1 year using an ad hoc side-effect questionnaire (19 physical symptoms) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). RESULTS: Of the 95 patients entered, the overall QOL questionnaire completion compliance was 75.6%. During cycle 3 of HDC, the number of symptoms was high (mean +/- SD QOL score, 10 +/- 3), with fatigue, hair loss, appetite loss, nausea, change in taste, vomiting, fever, and weight loss reported by more than 60% of patients. Toxicity and distress associated with HDC were reflected in the decline of four EORTC QLQ-C30 scores: global QOL (P =.001), and physical, role, and social functioning (P <.001 for all statistics). However, QOL deterioration disappeared after treatment completion, except for physical functioning (P =.025). One year after inclusion, most QOL scores returned to baseline, and both emotional functioning and global QOL scores were even higher than baseline (P =.030 and P =.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: If it is confirmed that improvements in pathologic response rates with HDC effectively translate into increased probabilities of survival for IBC patients, adoption of such treatment as PEGASE 02 will not involve crucial choices between length of life and QOL and should not be delayed for QOL arguments.     

Enalapril to prevent cardiac function decline in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer exposed to anthracyclines.

PURPOSE: To determine whether an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril, prevents cardiac function deterioration (defined using maximal cardiac index [MCI] on exercise testing or increase in left ventricular end-systolic wall stress [LVESWS]) in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing enalapril to placebo in 135 long-term survivors of pediatric cancer who had at least one cardiac abnormality identified at any time after anthracycline exposure. RESULTS: There was no difference in the rate of change in MCI per year between enalapril and placebo groups (0.30 v 0.18 L/min/m(2); P =.55). However, during the first year of treatment, the rate of change in LVESWS was greater in the enalapril group than in the placebo group (-8.59 v 1.85 g/cm(2); P =.033) and this difference was maintained over the study period, resulting in a 9% reduction in estimated LVESWS by year 5 in the enalapril group. Six of seven patients removed from random assignment to treatment because of cardiac deterioration were initially treated with placebo (P =.11), and one has died as a result of heart failure. Side effects from enalapril included dizziness or hypotension (22% v 3% in the placebo group; P =.0003) and fatigue (10% v 0%; P =.013). CONCLUSION: Enalapril treatment did not influence exercise performance, but did reduce LVESWS in the first year; this reduction was maintained over the study period. Any theoretical benefits of LVESWS reduction in this anthracycline-exposed population must be weighed against potential side effects from ACE inhibitors when making treatment decisions.     

Phase III study of interferon alfa-NL as adjuvant treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Intergroup trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of adjuvant interferon alfa after complete resection of locally extensive renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 283 eligible patients with pT3-4a and/or node-positive disease were randomly assigned after radical nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy to observation or to interferon alfa-NL (Wellferon, Burroughs-Wellcome, Research Park, NC) given daily for 5 days every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients were stratified on the basis of pathologic stage. Patients remained on treatment until documented recurrence, excessive toxicity, or patient/physician preference deemed removal appropriate. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 10.4 years, median survival was 7.4 years in the observation arm and 5.1 year in the treatment arm (log-rank P =.09). Median recurrence-free survival was 3.0 years in the observation arm and 2.2 years in the interferon arm (P =.33). Performance status (P =.003), nodal status (N2 v N0, P <.0001), and tumor stage (P =.0002) were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. A proportional hazards model examining the effects of treatment arm and time to recurrence on survival after recurrence among patients who recurred found that random assignment to interferon treatment (P =.009) and shorter time to recurrence (P <.0001) were independent predictors of shorter survival after recurrence. Although no lethal toxicities were observed, severe (grade 4) toxicities including neutropenia, myalgia, fatigue, depression, and other neurologic toxicities occurred in 11.4% of those randomly assigned to interferon treatment. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment with interferon did not contribute to survival or relapse-free survival in this group of patients.     

Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Adults with Newly Diagnosed High-grade Gliomas

Summary Objective To assess baseline quality of life (QOL) and its prognostic importance for adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas, we analyzed QOL and outcome data prospectively collected in three phase II high-grade glioma protocols. Methods At study entry, patients completed five self-administered forms to assess overall QOL (linear analogue scale assessment [LASA] and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain [FACT-Br]); fatigue (Symptom Distress Scale [SDS]); excessive daytime somnolence (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]); and depression (POMS-SF). Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores (PS) were obtained by the health care provider. Results Baseline QOL data were available for 194 of 220 patients (88%) enrolled in the three protocols. Differences in baseline QOL among the three studies were not statistically significant. One-third of patients had clinically significant fatigue at baseline. Increased fatigue (P = 0.003), excessive daytime somnolence (P = 0.01), and lower overall QOL scores (LASA, P = 0.001; FACT-Br, P = 0.0001) correlated with worse ECOG PS. No relation was found between QOL and corticosteroid or anticonvulsant therapy, extent of resection, tumor grade, or sex. Multivariate analyses found worse ECOG PS (PS 2, P = 0.007) associated with increased fatigue. Worse ECOG PS (PS 2, P = 0.002) was also associated with worse overall QOL (LASA). On multivariate analyses of survival, increased fatigue (P = 0.003) predicted poorer overall survival. Conclusions Performance status is related to QOL in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade brain tumors. Increased fatigue is an independent predictor of overall survival. Interventional studies directed at improving QOL, especially fatigue, may have important benefits for these patients.     

Pain and quality of life after treatment in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Because survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is limited, pain control and quality of life (QOL) are important parameters. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of posttreatment pain and QOL of patients with LRRC treated with nonsurgical palliation or resection and identify predictors of poor outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Posttreatment pain severity and QOL were prospectively assessed in 45 patients with LRRC using the Brief Pain Inventory and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received nonsurgical palliation, and 30 patients underwent resection of their pelvic tumors. There was a significant association between higher posttreatment pain scores and worse QOL (P <.001). Patients treated with nonsurgical palliation reported moderate to severe pain beyond the third month of treatment. Resected patients reported comparable levels of pain during the first 3 postoperative years, particularly after bony resections; long-term survivors (beyond 3 years), however, reported minimal pain and good QOL. Female sex, pelvic/sciatic pain at presentation, total pelvic exenteration, and bony resection were associated with higher rates of moderate to severe posttreatment pain (P =.04, P <.001, P =.04, and P =.02, respectively). Pain at presentation was an independent predictor of posttreatment pain (odds ratio, 7.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 30.3]; P =.006). CONCLUSION: Patients with LRRC treated with nonsurgical palliation or resection experience significant levels of pain after treatment. Close posttreatment pain monitoring is warranted in patients presenting with pelvic pain, and more aggressive pain management strategies may improve posttreatment QOL.     

Subdiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease: the University of Florida experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcomes and late effects of patients with subdiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one patients with Stage I and II subdiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease were treated with curative intent between February 1966 and February 1998 at the University of Florida. Patient characteristics were as follows: mean age, 38.7 years (range, 3-75 years); 20 males and 1 female; 33% lymphocyte predominant, 43% nodular sclerosing, 14% mixed cellularity, 5% lymphocyte depletion, and 5% unclassified Hodgkin's disease. Treatment included inverted Y irradiation (InY) (8 patients), total nodal irradiation (TNI) (7 patients), and combined modality irradiation and chemotherapy (CMT) (6 patients). Median follow-up was 12.3 years (range, 3.1-33.6 years). RESULTS: Progression-free survival and overall survival were 80% and 70%, respectively, at 10 years. There were no deaths from Hodgkin's disease. Treatment failures occurred in 1 of 8 patients after InY, 1 of 7 after TNI, and 1 of 6 after CMT. Two of 3 recurrences were in patients with 3 or more sites of involvement and/or splenic involvement; 1 was in-field. There were 5 second malignant neoplasms and 3 cardiac events, including 4 second malignant neoplasms and 2 cardiac events in the 9 patients > or =40 years old at diagnosis and 1 second malignant neoplasm and 1 cardiac event in the 12 patients <40 years old. All 3 second solid malignancies in this study occurred 7-14 years after treatment in areas receiving 10-20 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Subdiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease is an uncommon manifestation with excellent disease control achieved with InY, TNI, and CMT. This subgroup of patients with Hodgkin's disease is predominantly male and older than subgroups with other presentations, which may predispose the group to a higher risk for serious adverse events after treatment. We recommend InY with spleen for clinical Stages IA and nodular sclerosis or lymphocyte-predominant clinical Stage IIA, InY alone for pathologic Stages IA and IIA, and CMT for all Stage I/II patients with greater than three involved sites, B symptoms, bulky disease (>6 cm), central (para-aortic) presentation, or splenic involvement.     

Randomized comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease: report of an intergroup trial.

PURPOSE: In a series of trials, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (MOPP/ABV) have been identified as effective treatments for Hodgkin's disease. We compared these regimens as initial chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients (N = 856) with advanced Hodgkin's disease were randomly assigned to treatment with ABVD or MOPP/ABV. The major end points were failure-free and overall survival, life-threatening acute toxicities, and serious long-term toxicities, including cardiomyopathy, pulmonary toxicity, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and secondary malignancies. RESULTS: The rates of complete remission (76% v 80%, P =.16), failure-free survival at 5 years (63% v 66%, P =.42), and overall survival at 5 years (82% v 81%, P =.82) were similar for ABVD and MOPP/ABV, respectively. Clinically significant acute pulmonary and hematologic toxicity were more common with MOPP/ABV (P =.060 and.001, respectively). There was no difference in cardiac toxicity. There were 24 deaths attributed to initial treatment: nine with ABVD and 15 with MOPP/ABV (P =.057). There have been 18 second malignancies associated with ABVD and 28 associated with MOPP/ABV (P =.13). Thirteen patients have developed MDS or acute leukemia: 11 were initially treated with MOPP/ABV, and two were initially treated with ABVD but subsequently received MOPP-containing regimens and radiotherapy before developing leukemia (P =.011). CONCLUSION: ABVD and the MOPP/ABV hybrid are effective therapies for Hodgkin's disease. MOPP/ABV is associated with a greater incidence of acute toxicity, MDS, and leukemia. ABVD should be considered the standard regimen for treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease.     

Stage III Hodgkin's disease: improved survival with combined modality therapy as compared with radiation therapy alone

This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with pathologically stage IIIA and IIIB Hodgkin's disease treated from April 1969 to December 1982. The median follow-up was 108 months. Treatment consisted of radiation therapy (RT) alone in 54 patients and combined radiation therapy and MOPP (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) chemotherapy (CMT) in 66 patients. Stage III patients treated with CMT have an improved actuarial 12-year survival as compared with patients treated with RT alone with MOPP reserved for relapse (80% v 64%; P = .026). The 12-year actuarial freedom from first relapse by treatment for stage III patients is 83% and 40%, respectively (P less than .0001). Improved survivals following combined modality therapy are seen for the following subgroups of stage III patients: stage III2, 66% (CMT) v 44% (total nodal irradiation; TNI), P = .04; stage III1, 97% (CMT) v 73% (TNI), P = .05; stage III mixed cellularity or lymphocyte depletion histology, 94% (CMT) v 65% (TNI), P = .007; and stage III extensive splenic involvement, 77% (CMT) v 58% (TNI), P = .02. These survival differences are not seen in patients with nodular sclerosis or lymphocyte predominance histology or in patients with minimal splenic involvement. These data indicate that the initial use of CMT in stage III Hodgkin's disease results in an improved survival as compared with initial treatment with RT with MOPP reserved for relapse. Patients with limited Stage IIIA disease may still be candidates for radiation therapy alone.     

Lung cancer after Hodgkin's disease: a nested case-control study of the relation to treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate the causes of the raised risk of lung cancer in patients who have had Hodgkin's disease, and in particular the relationship to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted within a cohort of 5,519 patients with Hodgkin's disease treated in Britain during 1963 through 1993. For 88 cases of lung cancer and 176 matched control subjects, information on treatment and other risk factors was extracted from hospital case-notes, and odds ratios for lung cancer in relation to these factors were calculated. RESULTS: Risk of lung cancer was borderline significantly greater in patients treated with mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) chemotherapy than those who did not receive this treatment (relative risk [RR] = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 2.82), and increased with number of cycles of MOPP (P =.07). Exclusion of lung cancers for which histologic confirmation was not available strengthened these associations (RR = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.51; P =.004 for any MOPP and P =.007 for trend with number of cycles of MOPP). Risks were not raised, however, after chlorambucil, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone treatment. There was evidence that the raised risk of lung cancer occurring in relation to radiotherapy was restricted to histologies other than adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that MOPP chemotherapy may lead to elevated risk of lung cancer, at least in certain subgroups of patients. The role of chemotherapy in the etiology of lung cancer after Hodgkin's disease deserves further investigation.     

Consolidation radiation after complete remission in Hodgkin's disease following six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy: is there a need?

PURPOSE: Combined modality treatment using multidrug chemotherapy (CTh) and radiotherapy (RT) is currently considered the standard of care in early stage Hodgkin's disease. Its role in advanced stages, however, continues to be debated. This study was aimed at evaluating the role of consolidation radiation in patients achieving a complete remission after six cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy using event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as primary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one patients with Hodgkin's disease attending the lymphoma clinic at the Tata Memorial Hospital (Mumbai, India) from 1993 to 1996 received induction chemotherapy with six cycles of ABVD after initial staging evaluation. A total of 179 of 251 patients (71%) achieved a complete remission after six cycles of ABVD chemotherapy and constituted the randomized population. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either consolidation radiation or no further therapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 63 months, the 8-year EFS and OS in the CTh-alone arm were 76% and 89%, respectively, as compared with 88% and 100% in the CTh+RT arm (P =.01; P =.002). Addition of RT improved EFS and OS in patients with age < 15 years (P =.02; P =.04), B symptoms (P =.03; P =.006), advanced stage (P =.03; P =.006), and bulky disease (P =.04; P =.19). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the addition of consolidation radiation helps improve the EFS and OS in patients achieving a complete remission after six cycles of ABVD chemotherapy, particularly in the younger age group and in patients with B symptoms and bulky and advanced disease.     

Assessment of quality of life during intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation

Quality of life (QOL) of 179 patients with hematological malignancies, hospitalized for induction chemotherapy, allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), was analyzed on three time points at 10 days interval after completion of the cytotoxic treatment. The instruments used were the EORTC questionnaire--with modifications of the physical and social functioning subscales, in order to adapt to the prolonged stay in the hospital--, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a specifically designed leukemia/BMT module. The psychometric properties of the scales were confirmed, except for the physical functioning and social subscales, for which further methodological studies are warranted. A relatively high frequency of somatic symptoms, fatigue, anxiety and depression was observed, with a trend to improvement at the end of hospitalization. The overall self-assessed QOL correlated mainly with fatigue and emotional disorders but not with the somatic symptoms. Randomized disclosure of the collected information to the staff allowed them to better identify patients who needed a psychotherapeutic intervention, but did not influence the psychological and QOL outcomes.     

Vinblastine, bleomycin, and methotrexate: an effective adjuvant in favorable Hodgkin's disease

Sixty-seven patients with favorable pathologic stage (PS) I and IIA or B or IIIA Hodgkin's disease were randomized to receive subtotal or total lymphoid irradiation (STLI/TLI) alone or involved field irradiation (IF) plus six cycles of a novel adjuvant chemotherapy containing vinblastine, bleomycin, and methotrexate (VBM). With a follow-up from 6 to 72 months (median, 37 months), the actuarial freedom-from-progressive disease (FFP) at 5 years is 70% after STLI/TLI and 95% after IF plus VBM. One death has occurred in the irradiation-only treatment group. The data for IF plus VBM are significantly superior to previous actuarial results at 5 years using IF alone (FFP = 35%, P less than .00001) and compare favorably with prior results with IF plus nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, +/- prednisone (MOP[P]) chemotherapy (FFP = 80% at 5 years, P = .10). VBM is well tolerated with greater than 90% of calculated doses delivered. As anticipated, VBM has had relatively little adverse effect on male or female fertility. Selected pulmonary functions are reduced early after IF plus VBM to a greater degree than with irradiation of the mediastinum alone, but the differences are modest. Based upon our current numbers and follow-up, we can be 90% confident that VBM as an adjuvant to irradiation in favorable Hodgkin's disease is as effective, or even superior, to MOP(P) chemotherapy. Because of its lesser toxicity, adjuvant VBM may have a broader role in the management of Hodgkin's disease.     

Phase II double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study of armodafinil for brain radiation-induced fatigue

Background

Common acute-term side effects of brain radiotherapy (RT) include fatigue, drowsiness, decreased physical functioning, and decreased quality of life (QOL). We hypothesized that armodafinil (a wakefulness-promoting drug known to reduce fatigue and increase cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy) would result in reduced fatigue and sleepiness for patients receiving brain RT.

Methods

A phase II, multi-institutional, placebo-controlled randomized trial assessed feasibility of armodafinil 150 mg/day in participants receiving brain RT, from whom we obtained estimates of variability for fatigue, sleepiness, QOL, cognitive function, and treatment effect.

Results

From September 20, 2010, to October 20, 2012, 54 participants enrolled with 80% retention and 94% self-reported compliance. There were no grade 4–5 toxicities, and the incidence of grade 2–3 toxicities was similar between treatment arms, the most common of which were anxiety and nausea (15%), headaches (19%), and insomnia (20%). There were no statistically significant differences in end-RT or 4 week post-RT outcomes between armodafinil and placebo in any outcomes (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue, Brief Fatigue Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, FACT-Brain, and FACIT-cognitive function). However, in participants with more baseline fatigue, those treated with armodafinil did better than those who received the placebo on the end-RT assessments for several outcomes.

Conclusion

Armodafinil 150 mg/day was well tolerated in primary brain tumor patients undergoing RT with good compliance. While there was no overall significant effect on fatigue, those with greater baseline fatigue experienced improved QOL and reduced fatigue when using armodafinil. These data suggest that a prospective, phase III randomized trial is warranted for patients with greater baseline fatigue.     

150例早期霍奇金淋巴瘤的综合治疗

目的 对比单纯化疗、单纯放疗与综合治疗对早期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析150例Ⅰ期或Ⅱ期(早期)HL患者的临床资料,按照初次治疗方式分为单纯化疗组(22例)、单纯放疗组(18例)、化疗联合放疗的综合治疗组(109例)和手术组(1例).化疗方案以ABVD和MOPP为主,放疗方式主要包括受累野放疗、扩大野放疗和次全淋巴结照射.结果 结节硬化型、混合细胞型、淋巴细胞为主型、淋巴细胞消减型和结节性淋巴细胞为主型HL分别为84、39、23、3和1例.全组有72例患者资料完整,可判断预后,其中以欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织及德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组标准判断为0分者分别占36.1%和29.2%.全组完全缓解33例,部分缓解109例,疾病稳定5例,疾病进展3例.全组中位随访71.5个月,6年治疗失败率为18.8%,7年总生存率为89.3%.单因素分析显示,综合治疗的疗效显著优于单纯化疗,结节硬化型和混合细胞型的治疗失败风险明显低于淋巴细胞为主型(均P＜0.05).多因素分析显示,治疗方式可以显著影响预后,单纯化疗发生治疗失败的风险是综合治疗的2.52倍(P=0.004).单因素和多因素分析均未发现总生存时间的影响因素.综合治疗组的急性不良反应发生率较单纯化疗组或单纯放疗组高,主要表现为白细胞减低、胃肠道反应和脱发.结论 对于早期HL,综合治疗可降低治疗失败风险,但不良反应较重.