Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long‐term studies?

OBJECTIVE: A review of long-term open-label studies was performed with the aim of detecting differences in efficacy and/or tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: From more than 500 open studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) or zonisamide (ZNS), we selected all studies that reported or allowed us to calculate the number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months and/or the number of patients withdrawing for adverse effects and/or the number or percentage of patients continuing treatment after 1 year. RESULTS: No studies were found in which this information was available for OXC, PGB, TGB or ZNS. The number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months was reported in four studies each for GBP and TPM, five studies for LTG, and eight studies for LEV. The best efficacy profile using this end point was found for LEV, followed by TPM, LTG, and GBP. Twenty-two studies reported the number of patients withdrawing due to adverse effects. LEV was the best-tolerated AED, a little ahead of LTG, and significantly better than GBP or TPM . TPM was by far the least well-tolerated drug. Information concerning patients continuing treatment after 1 year was reported in two GBP studies, two TPM studies, six LEV studies and five LTG studies. GBP had a very low retention rate (between 20% and 25% of patients continued the drug), while TPM and LTG had a retention rate of 40-60% and LEV had a retention rate of 60-75%. CONCLUSION: One limitation of these rankings is that their statistical value is limited because of the indirect nature of the comparisons. Anyhow, this review covers the main studies published thus far on this subject and provides full updated information on the current literature about these drugs.     

Long-term retention rates of new antiepileptic drugs in adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability

We compared the long-term retention rates of several newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a residential community of adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability. Data relating to duration of therapy, maximum dose, and tolerability of six new AEDs-gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TIA), and topiramate (TPM)-were collected. Drug retention at 2 years was 85% (OXC), 57% (LTG), 56% (LEV), 45% (TPM), 24% (TIA) and 15% (GBP). OXC was used mainly as a substitute for carbamazepine. LTG, LEV, and TPM were all associated with retention rates higher than those of GBP or TIA. TPM had the highest rate of adverse event development at the maximum tried dose (60%), whereas LEV had the lowest (16%). Experience from this single epilepsy community study indicated limited impact for GBP or TIA but higher retention of OXC, LEV, LTG, and TPM in patients with chronic epilepsy and learning disability.     

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects of antiepileptic drugs in adults with epilepsy

PurposePsychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are common, undesirable effects associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) use. The objective of the study was to compare the PBSE profiles of older and newer AEDs in a large specialty practice-based sample of patients diagnosed with epilepsy.MethodsAs part of the Columbia and Yale AED Database Project, we reviewed patient records including demographics, medical history, AED use, and side effects for 4085 adult patients (age: 18 years) newly started on an AED regimen. Psychiatric and behavioral side effects were determined by patient or physician report in the medical record, which included depressive mood, psychosis, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, irritability, aggression, and tantrum. Significant non-AED predictors of PBSE rate were first determined from 83 variables using logistic regression. Predictors were then controlled for in the comparison analysis of the rate of PBSEs and intolerable PBSEs (PBSEs that led to dosage reduction or discontinuation) between 18 AEDs.ResultsPsychiatric and behavioral side effects occurred in 17.2% of patients and led to intolerability in 13.8% of patients. History of psychiatric condition(s), secondary generalized seizures, absence seizures, and intractable epilepsy were associated with increased incidence of PBSE. Levetiracetam (LEV) had the greatest PBSE rate (22.1%). This was statistically significant when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs (P < 0.001, OR = 6.87). Levetiracetam was also significantly (P < 0.001) associated with higher intolerability rate (17.7%), dose decreased rate (9.4%), and complete cessation rate (8.3%), when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs. Zonisamide (ZNS) was also significantly associated with a higher rate of PBSE (9.7%) and IPBSE (7.9%, all P < 0.001). On the other hand, carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA) were significantly associated with a decreased PBSE rates (P < 0.001). Carbamazepine, GBP, LTG, PHT, and VPA were also associated with lower IPBSE rates when compared individually with the aggregate of other AEDs. All other AEDs were found to have intermediate rates that were not either increased or decreased compared with other AEDs. When each AED was compared to LTG, only CBZ had a significantly lower PBSE rate. The main limitations of this study were that the study design was retrospective and not blinded, and the AEDs were not randomly assigned to patients.ConclusionsPsychiatric and behavioral side effects occur more frequently in patients taking LEV and ZNS than any other AED and led to higher rates of intolerability. Lower PBSE rates were seen in patients taking CBZ, CLB, GBP, LTG, OXC, PHT, and VPA. Our findings may help facilitate the AED selection process.     

An Overview of the Efficacy and Tolerability of New Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of recently developed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), a systematic review of placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the AEDs as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy was conducted. Two or more RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were found for gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), and zonisamide (ZNS). The outcome selected for estimation of efficacy was the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Tolerability was estimated on the basis of rates of patient withdrawal from study for any reason. Efficacy and tolerability odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each measure were generated for each trial included in the analysis, and overall efficacy and tolerability ORs were calculated for each AED across all trials and drug dosages evaluated. Because 95% CIs for both efficacy and tolerability overlapped for the six drugs, conclusive evidence of between-drug differences in effectiveness or safety were not obtained from the analysis. However, the data suggest that the drug with the highest OR for efficacy (TPM) may be approximately twice as effective as the AED with the lowest OR for efficacy (GBP), and that the treatment that appears to most frequently cause withdrawal (ZNS) may be about four times more likely to do so that the AED with the lowest withdrawal rate (LTG). RCTs comparing newer AEDs with the older standard drugs and with each other are needed to further evaluate their relative utility.     

Gewichtsveränderungen unter Antiepileptikagabe

Antiepileptic drugs (AED) are usually taken for a number of years. Therefore, long-term tolerability is of great importance for the choice of an AED. Weight change is a highly relevant side effect and can be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, several AEDs and especially some of the newer AEDs induce weight changes. Weight gain has been observed with valproate (VPA) and pregabalin (PGB) but also with gabapentin (GBP) and questionably with carbamazepine (CBZ). Weight loss, on the other hand, has been associated with long-term treatment with topiramate (TPM), zonisamide (ZNS), felbamate (FBM) and was also reported for rufinamide (RFM) and stiripentole (STP). Lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoine (PHT), the barbiturates, levetiracetam (LEV), lacosamide (LCM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC) are considered to have no systematic effect on body weight. The weight change observed was frequently associated with a change in appetite and food consumption in the same direction. Genetic factors are likely relevant for the AED-related weight change.     

Cross-sensitivity of patient-perceived adverse cognitive effects with antiepileptic drug use

ObjectiveThe extent to which adverse cognitive effects (ACEs) to a specific antiepileptic drug (AED) affect the chance of developing ACEs to other AEDs (i.e., cross-sensitivity) is unknown. We investigated the rates of cross-sensitivity of ACEs among AEDs and examined the association between clinical characteristics and occurrence of having ACEs to multiple AEDs in adults with epilepsy.MethodsThe rates of cross-sensitivity of intolerable ACEs (IACEs; i.e., ACEs leading to dosage reduction or discontinuation) and the non-AED predictors of IACEs were investigated in 2269 patients who had taken at least two AEDs at a single center. We accounted for AED load and looked for specific cross-sensitivities between AEDs as well as cross-sensitivity based on the AED mechanism of action.ResultsAmong the 2269 patients, the highest rates of IACEs were seen with TPM (26.3%), ZNS (9.8%), PHT (8.8%), and VPA (8.5%). Intolerable ACEs to two or more AEDs occurred in 100 patients (4.4%). History of psychiatric condition(s) and absence seizure type were independent predictors of IACEs to two or more AEDs. High rates of cross-sensitivity of IACEs were seen between phenytoin (PHT) and lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA) and phenytoin, and valproate and zonisamide (ZNS). For example, of patients who had IACEs to VPA and were also prescribed ZNS, 46.2% had IACEs to ZNS (abbreviated as VPA → ZNS: 46.2%); of patients who had IACEs to ZNS and were also prescribed VPA, 37.5% had IACEs to VPA (abbreviated as ZNS → VPA: 37.5%). Other results are as follows: LTG → PHT: 28.6%, PHT → LTG: 20.0%, PHT → VPA: 42.9%, and VPA → PHT: 27.3%. No specific cross-sensitivities were found among AEDs sharing a similar mechanism of action.SignificanceThe probability of ACE intolerability to an AED can increase if a patient developed ACE intolerability to another AED. The cross-sensitivity rates for ACE intolerability between LTG and PHT, PHT and VPA, and VPA and ZNS were found to be particularly high. The cross-sensitivity rates provided here may be clinically useful for predicting ACE intolerability in patients taking certain AEDs and for AED selection in individual patients.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characterization of interactions between levetiracetam and numerous antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE: Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not experience satisfactory seizure control with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy and often require polytherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, is therefore of major importance. The present study sought to identify potentially useful AED combinations with levetiracetam (LEV) METHODS: With isobolographic analysis, the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model was investigated with regard to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, phenobarbital (PB), valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), administered singly and in combination with LEV. Acute adverse effects were ascertained by use of the chimney test evaluating motor performance and the step-through passive-avoidance task assessing long-term memory. Brain AED concentrations were determined to ascertain any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect. RESULTS: LEV in combination with TPM, at the fixed ratios of 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, was supraadditive (synergistic) in the MES test. Likewise, the combination of LEV with CBZ (at the fixed ratio of 16:1) and LEV with OXC (8:1 and 16:1) were supraadditive. In contrast, all other LEV/AED combinations displayed additivity. Furthermore, none of the investigated LEV/AED combinations altered motor performance and long-term memory. LEV brain concentrations were unaffected by concomitant AED administration, and LEV had no significant effect on brain concentrations of concomitant AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: These preclinical data would suggest that LEV in combination with TPM is associated with beneficial anticonvulsant pharmacodynamic interactions. Similar, but less profound effects were seen with OXC and CBZ.     

Characteristics of patients initiated on the new antiepileptic drugs: a PADS study

Whereas randomized controlled trials remain a standard for evaluating and comparing efficacy and safety of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), postmarketing drug research offers a useful means of comparing efficacy and safety of new AEDs. However, differences in baseline characteristics of patients in different drug groups create the potential for bias in drug comparison studies. In this study, baseline demographic characteristics of 1,386 patients initiating lamotrigine (LTG), tiagabine (TGB), or topiramate (TPM) were compared to identify patient characteristics that may influence AED use in epilepsy patients. Data were collected at 14 epilepsy centers and included medications, seizure types and syndromes, and prior adverse events. There were 402 patients in the LTG group, 725 TPM, and 259 TGB. The groups differed both in their number of concurrent AEDs (p<0.001) and in their number of prior AEDs (p<0.01). There was no difference in proportion with partial versus generalized epilepsy syndromes. The groups differed in the proportions of patients with complex partial seizures (p=0.049), primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (p=0.01), and myoclonic seizures (p=0.03). Baseline behavioral adverse event rate was lowest in patients initiating TPM (p<0.01); LTG patients had the lowest rate of prior AED-related rash (p=0.02). There was no relationship between AED assignment and patient age, age of epilepsy onset, epilepsy duration, institutionalization status, gender, or psychiatric history. Numerous epidemiological differences were identified among patients placed on the new AEDs, including current and prior AED profiles, seizure types, and prior adverse event history. Accounting for these differences is of crucial importance because they may bias conclusions of nonrandomized post-marketing trials comparing the drugs.     

Basic Science

Jarogniew J. Luszczki , Marta M. Andres , Piotr Czuczwar , Anna Cioczek-Czuczwar , Neville Ratnaraj , Philip N. Patsalos , and Stanislaw J. Czuczwar
Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not experience satisfactory seizure control with current front-line antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy and often require polytherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, is therefore of major importance. The present study sought to identify potentially useful AED combinations with levetiracetam (LEV), recently introduced as an effective AED for refractory partial seizures. The mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model was investigated with regard to the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, phenobarbital (PB), valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), administered singly and in combination with LEV. Acute adverse effects were ascertained by use of the chimney test, evaluating motor performance, and the passive avoidance task, assessing long-term memory. Brain AED concentrations were determined to ascertain any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect. LEV in combination with TPM exerted supraadditive (synergistic) interactions in the MES test. Likewise, the combinations of LEV with CBZ and OXC were supraadditive in this test. In contrast, all other LEV/AED combinations displayed additivity. Furthermore, none of the investigated combinations altered motor performance and long-term memory. LEV brain concentrations were unaffected by concomitant AED administration, and LEV had no significant effect on brain concentrations of concomitant AEDs. These preclinical data would suggest that LEV in combination with TPM is associated with beneficial anticonvulsant pharmacodynamic interactions. Similar, but less profound effects were seen with OXC and CBZ.     

Seizure-free outcome in randomized add-on trials of the new antiepileptic drugs

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to (1) provide clinically useful, previously unpublished comparative analyses of seizure-freedom rates for newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and (2) recommend a standard for data presentation and analysis. METHODS: Data were reviewed from placebo-controlled adjunctive trials in refractory patients of gabapentin (GPN), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TOP), tiagabine (TGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), levetiracetam (LEV), zonisamide (ZNS), and pregabalin (PGB). Seizure-freedom analyses in these publications, if included at all, consistently included both patients who completed the trial, and those who dropped out prior to completion (last observation carried forward, LOCF). This has the potential to increase reported seizure-free outcomes. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted for the provision of unpublished seizure-free data in the patients who completed the entire study. RESULTS: In most cases, LOCF analysis produced a higher rate of seizure freedom compared to complete analysis. A total of 0%-1.1% of the LOCF population was seizure-free in the GPN trials (complete data not available). For the remaining AEDs, seizure-freedom results in the LOCF versus complete populations were: 0.7% versus 0.8% (LTG trial); 12% versus 2.6% (OXC trial); 3.6%-6.4% versus 3.9%-7.1% (LEV trial); 3.7%-7.9% versus 1.3%-1.4% (PGB trial); and 6.0% versus 3.0% (ZNS trial, minus titration period). CONCLUSIONS: By employing LOCF, a clinically unrealistic picture of seizure-free rates may be reported. Access to complete data is informative, as it includes only those patients who were able to tolerate the drug at doses that produced seizure freedom. Ideally, data from both ITT and complete analyses should be made available.     

Cross-reactivity pattern of rash from current aromatic antiepileptic drugs

We have investigated cross-reactivity of rash among the current aromatic antiepileptic drugs, particularly between the new and the traditional compounds. A retrospective survey of medical records concerning all aromatic antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in consecutive adult patients with epilepsy was performed. Altogether 663 patients were included comprising 2567 exposures to AEDs. Skin reactions occurred in 93 patients and sequential rashes related to aromatic drugs in 17. Phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) caused rashes in the range of 27-35% in patients with a history of another AED-related rash, whereas lamotrigine (LTG) caused another rash in 17%. A history of an AED-related rash was significantly associated with reactions to PHT, CBZ, and OXC (p<0.001). The association was only borderline significant for LTG (p=0.05). Nevertheless, the occurrence was consistently increased in all subgroups with reactions to other AEDs. A CBZ rash was not significantly associated with an LTG reaction, and vice versa, but the number of patients was limited. Less than one third of patients with a CBZ rash also reacted to OXC. No evidence for increased severity of sequential rashes was found. Clinicians should be aware of the cross-reactivity of the aromatic AEDs regarding cutaneous adverse events, as well as their differences in this respect. LTG appears to be involved in cross-reactions less often than CBZ, OXC and PHT.     

An In Vitro Study of New Antiepileptic Drugs and Astrocytes

Summary:  Purpose: The aim of our research was to study some biochemical modifications elicited in primary rat astrocyte cultures by treatment with gabapentin (GBP), carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TGB), and levetiracetam (LEV), commonly used in the treatment of epilepsy. We investigated the biologic effects of these anticonvulsants (AEDs) at concentrations of 1, 10, 50, and 100 μg/ml.
Methods: The study was performed by examining cell viability (MTT assay), cell toxicity [lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in the medium], glutamine synthetase (GS) activity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, lipoperoxidation level (malondialdehyde; MDA), and DNA fragmentation (COMET assay). The level of the expression of 70-kDa heat-shock protein (HSP70) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) as oxidative stress–modulated genes also was determined.
Results: Our experiments indicate that CBZ, TPM, and OXC induce stress on astrocytes at all concentrations. GBP, LTG, TGB, and LEV, at low concentrations, do not significantly change the metabolic activities examined and do not demonstrate toxic actions on astrocytes. They do so at higher concentrations.
Conclusions: Most AEDs have effects on glial cells and, when used at an appropriate cell-specific concentrations, may be well tolerated by cortical astrocytes. However, at higher concentrations, GBP, LTG, TGB, and LEV seem to be better tolerated than are CBZ, TPM, and OXC. These findings may reveal novel ways of producing large numbers of new AEDs capable of reducing the extent of inflammation, neuronal damage, and death under pathological conditions such as epilepsy and/or traumatic brain injury.     

The Effect of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognition: Patient Perceived Cognitive Problems of Topiramate versus Levetiracetam in Clinical Practice

Summary:  Introduction: Neurocognitive complaints may interfere with long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and are an important issue in clinical practice. Most data about drug-induced cognitive problems are derived from highly controlled short-term clinical trials. We analyzed such cognitive complaints for the two most commonly used AEDs in a clinical setting using patient perceived problems as primary outcome measure.
Method: All patients of the epilepsy center Kempenhaeghe that received topiramate (TPM) or levetiracetam (LEV) from the introduction to mid 2004 were analyzed using a medical information system, an automated medical file. Patients were analyzed after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment.
Results: Four hundred and two patients used either TPM (n = 260) or LEV (n = 142); 18 months retention showed a statistically significant difference, revealing 15% more patients that continued LEV compared to TPM: 18 months retention 46% for TPM and 61% for LEV [F (1.400) = 3.313, p = 0.043]. Neurocognitive complaints accounted for a significant number of drug discontinuations and especially the high frequency of neurocognitive complaints in the first period of TPM treatment appeared to be significant different from LEV [F(2,547) = 3.192, p = 0.042]. In the remaining patients, the difference in neurocognitive complaints was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: cognitive complaints are common in TPM treatment and frequently lead to drug withdrawal. The impact of LEV on cognitive function is only mild. This leads to a much higher (15%) drug discontinuation rate for TPM compared to LEV.     

Long-term effects of levetiracetam and topiramate in clinical practice: A head-to-head comparison.

OBJECTIVE: Two of the most commonly prescribed new antiepileptic drugs as add-on therapy for patients with chronic refractory epilepsies are topiramate and levetiracetam. In regulatory trials, both drugs were characterized as very promising new antiepileptic drugs. However, results from these highly controlled short-term clinical trials cannot simply be extrapolated to everyday clinical practice, also because head-to-head comparisons are lacking. Therefore, results from long-term open label observational studies that compare two or more new AEDs are crucial to determine the long-term performance of competing new antiepileptic drugs in clinical practice. METHOD: We analyzed all patients referred to a tertiary epilepsy centre who had been treated with topiramate from the introduction of the drug in spring 1993 up to a final assessment point mid-2002 and all patients who had been treated with LEV in the same centre from the introduction of the drug in early 2001 up to a final assessment point end-2003 using a medical information system. RESULTS: Three hundred and one patients were included for levetiracetam and 429 patients for TPM. Retention rate after 1 year was 65.6% for LEV-treated patients and 51.7% for TPM-treated patients (p=0.0015). Similarly, retention rates for LEV were higher at the 24-month mark: 45.8% of LEV-treated patients and 38.3% of TPM-treated patients were still continuing treatment (p=0.0046). Adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 21.9% of TPM-treated patients compared to 6.0% of LEV-treated patients (p<0.001). The number of patients discontinuing treatment because of lack of efficacy was similar for both groups. Seizure freedom rates varied between 11.6 and 20.0% for TPM and between 11.1 and 14.3% for LEV per 6-months interval. Several important AED specific adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were identified, including neurocognitive side effects from TPM and mood disorders from LEV. CONCLUSION: The retention rate for LEV is significantly higher than for TPM. LEV had a more favourable side effect profile than TPM with comparable efficacy. Patients on TPM discontinued treatment mainly because of neurocognitive side effects. In the treatment with LEV, the effects on mood must not be underestimated.     

Effects of new antiepileptic drugs on circulatory markers for vascular risk in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

Although it is well documented that long‐term therapy with older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) leads to an increase in risk for atherosclerosis, there has been only limited information regarding the vascular risk in patients who are treated with new AEDs. We therefore conducted a prospective longitudinal study to assess the potential effects of new AEDs on the circulatory markers for vascular risk in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We recruited adult patients with epilepsy who began to receive monotherapy with one of the new AEDs, including levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and topiramate (TPM). Circulatory markers of vascular risk were measured twice before and after 6 months of AED monotherapy. A total of 109 patients completed the study (LEV, n = 40; OXC, n = 40; TPM, n = 29). Six months of monotherapy resulted in significant increases in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LEV, from 90.2 to 98.5 mg/dl, 9.2% increase, p = 0.025; OXC, from 96.5 to 103.2 mg/dl, 7.0% increase, p = 0.049), homocysteine (LEV, from 7.9 to 10.4 μm , 31.6% increase, p = 0.001; OXC, from 8.7 to 11.5 μm , 32.2% increase, p < 0.001; TPM, from 8.3 to 12.3 μm , 48.2% increase, p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (LEV, from 63.6 to 77.4 mg/dl, 21.7% increase; OXC, from 67.0 to 83.2 mg/dl, 24.2% increase; TPM, from 66.7 to 84.4 mg/dl, 26.5% increase; all p < 0.001), and apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio (LEV, from 0.51 to 0.61, 19.6% increase; OXC, from 0.52 to 0.67, 28.8% increase; TPM, from 0.50 to 0.67, 34.0% increase; all p < 0.001). Serum apolipoprotein A1 and folate were significantly decreased in TPM (from 139.1 to 132.1 mg/dl, 5.0% decrease, p = 0.014) and OXC (from 8.1 to 6.4 ng/ml, 21.0% decrease, p = 0.046) groups, respectively. There were no significant changes in total cholesterol, triglyceride, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), and vitamin B12 in all three groups. Our findings suggest that treatment with some new AEDs might be associated with alterations in circulatory markers of vascular risk, which could contribute to the acceleration of atherosclerosis and increased risk of vascular diseases.     

Comparison of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine monotherapy among Korean patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: A long‐term,randomized, open‐label trial

This open‐label, multicenter, randomized phase IV trial (NCT01498822) of noninferiority design compared the long‐term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy with those of oxcarbazepine (OXC) monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Korean patients (16–80 years), with ≥2 unprovoked focal seizures in the year preceding the trial, who had not taken any antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the last 6 months, were randomized to receive LEV or OXC (1:1). Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability were assessed over a 50‐week period. Treatment failure rates (per protocol set) were 15/118 (12.7%) in the LEV‐treated group and 30/128 (23.4%) in the OXC‐treated group, an absolute difference of ?10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] ?20.2, ?1.2). Because the upper 95% CI limit was less than the pre‐specified noninferiority margin of 15%, LEV was considered noninferior to OXC. Twenty‐four‐week and 48‐week seizure freedom rates were 53.8% and 34.7% for LEV vs. 58.5% and 40.9% for OXC. Both LEV and OXC were well tolerated, with 8.7% and 8.6% of patients reporting serious treatment‐emergent adverse events, respectively. By comparing LEV with OXC, another newer AED, LEV can be considered a useful option as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.     

Impact of mood stabilizers and antiepileptic drugs on cytokine production in-vitro

Changes within the immune system have been reported to contribute to the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder and epilepsy. Interestingly, overlapping results regarding the cytokine system have been found for both diseases, namely alterations of interleukins IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). However, the effect of mood stabilizers and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on these cytokines has not been systematically evaluated, and their effect on IL-17 and IL-22, other immunologically important cytokines, has not been reported. Therefore, we systematically measured levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22 and TNF-α in stimulated blood of 14 healthy female subjects in a whole blood assay using the toxic shock syndrome toxin TSST-1 as stimulant. Blood was supplemented with the mood stabilizers or antiepileptic drugs primidone (PRM), carbamazepine (CBZ), levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), valproic acid (VPA), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), phenobarbital (PB), lithium, or no drug. IL-1β production was significantly decreased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, LTG, OXC, PB and lithium. IL-2 significantly decreased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, LTG, VPA, OXC, TPM and PB. IL-22 significantly increased by PRM, CBZ, LEV, OXC, TPM and lithium and decreased by VPA. TNF-α production significantly decreased under all applied drugs. The mechanism of action and side effects of mood stabilizers and AEDs may involve modulation of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-22 and TNF-α signaling pathways. IL-22 may be a research target for specific therapeutic effects of mood stabilizers and AEDs. These drugs might influence cytokine production by modulating ion channels and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors of immune cells.     

7-Nitroindazole potentiates the anticonvulsant action of some second-generation antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

Summary. The effects of 7-nitroindazole (7NI, a preferential neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) on the anticonvulsant activity of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs: felbamate [FBM], lamotrigine [LTG], oxcarbazepine [OXC] and topiramate [TPM]) were studied in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. Moreover, the influence of 7NI on the acute neurotoxic (adverse-effect) profiles of the studied AEDs, with regard to motor coordination, was determined in the chimney test in mice. Results indicate that 7NI (50 mg/kg; i.p.) significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of OXC, but not that of FBM, LTG and TPM against MES-induced seizures and, simultaneously, it enhanced the acute neurotoxic effects of TPM, but not those of FBM, LTG and OXC in the chimney test in mice. 7NI at the lower dose of 25 mg/kg had no effect on the antiseizure activity and acute neurotoxic profiles of all investigated AEDs. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of interactions between 7NI and LTG, OXC and TPM against MES-induced seizures revealed no significant changes in free (non-protein bound) plasma AED concentrations following 7NI administration. Moreover, none of the examined combinations of 7NI with AEDs from the MES test were associated with long-term memory impairment in mice subjected to the step-through passive avoidance task. Based on our preclinical study, it can be concluded that only the combination of 7NI with OXC was beneficial, when considering its both anticonvulsant and acute neurotoxic effects. Moreover, the lack of impairment of long-term memory and no pharmacokinetic interactions in plasma of experimental animals make the combination of 7NI with OXC worthy of consideration for the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy. The other combinations tested between 7NI and LTG, FBM and TPM were neutral, when considering their both anticonvulsant effects and acute neurotoxic profiles, therefore, no useful recommendation can be made for their clinical application.