Breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women using testosterone in addition to usual hormone therapy

OBJECTIVE: There is now convincing evidence that usual hormone therapy for ovarian failure increases the risk for breast cancer. We have previously shown that ovarian androgens normally protect mammary epithelial cells from excessive estrogenic stimulation, and therefore we hypothesized that the addition of testosterone to usual hormone therapy might protect women from breast cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational study that followed 508 postmenopausal women receiving testosterone in addition to usual hormone therapy in South Australia. Breast cancer status was ascertained by mammography at the initiation of testosterone treatment and biannually thereafter. The average age at the start of follow-up was 56.4 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 5.8 years. Breast cancer incidence in this group was compared with that of untreated women and women using usual hormone therapy reported in the medical literature and to age-specific local population rates. RESULTS: There were seven cases of invasive breast cancer in this population of testosterone users, for an incidence of 238 per 100,000 woman-years. The rate for estrogen/progestin and testosterone users was 293 per 100,000 woman-years--substantially less than women receiving estrogen/pro-gestin in the Women's Health Initiative study (380 per 100,000 woman-years) or in the "Million Women" Study (521 per 100,000 woman-years). The breast cancer rate in our testosterone users was closest to that reported for hormone therapy never-users in the latter study (283 per 100,000 woman-years), and their age-standardized rate was the same as for the general population in South Australia. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that the addition of testosterone to conventional hormone therapy for postmenopausal women does not increase and may indeed reduce the hormone therapy-associated breast cancer risk-thereby returning the incidence to the normal rates observed in the general, untreated population.     

Lessons to be learned from animal studies on hormones and the breast

The relation of hormone use by postmenopausal women to breast cancer risk has been controversial and unclear. A recent large randomized trial, the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and a large observational study (Million Women Study) provided somewhat conflicting answers. The WHI found an increased incidence of breast cancer among women given hormone therapy (conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate) but no increase in those given estrogen only therapy (conjugated equine estrogen alone). Whereas, the Million Women Study found an increased breast cancer risk among the estrogen plus progestin and the estrogen only users. This review brings comparative perspective to the issue of the effects of estrogen plus progestin versus estrogen only effects on breast cancer and is focused particularly on nonhuman primates. Although data from rodents is mixed, studies of monkeys suggest that estrogen only treatment has little or no effect on breast cell proliferation, and by inference, on breast cancer risk. On the other hand, data from both mouse and monkey studies strongly support the conclusion that the co-administration of a progestogen with an estrogen markedly increases breast cell proliferation and the potential for breast cancer promotion.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: There is a rapidly evolving debate on the indications and appropriate duration of therapy for postmenopausal hormone therapy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the specific relationships of postmenopausal estrogen therapy (ET), postmenopausal combined (estrogen-progestogen) hormone therapy (CHT), and the incidence of breast cancer. DESIGN: We performed computerized searches of MEDLINE and CancerLit through September 2003 and reviewed reference lists of retrieved studies and meta-analyses. We included English-language studies that identified noncontraceptive postmenopausal hormone use; reported on the risks of "current use" of ET and/or CHT and breast cancer incidence; were case-control, cohort, or experimental; and reported either an odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), or HR with CIs. Two investigators were involved during all stages of study selection and independently extracted all data selected for inclusion in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 13 studies of ET and breast cancer (700,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.16 (95% confidence limits [CL] 1.06, 1.28), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) and more than 5 years use 1.20 (1.06, 1.37). Meta-analysis of eight studies of CHT and breast cancer (650,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.39 (95% CL 1.12, 1.72), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.35 (1.16, 1.57) and more than 5 years use 1.63 (1.22, 2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Data from observational studies support the association of increased but considerably different risks for breast cancer incidence among current users of ET and CHT. These represent the first pooled estimates for ET. CHT estimates correspond to those from randomized trials.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: What is the problem?

Observational studies provide evidence that breast cancer risk is increased with long-term oral use of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ET). Various large cohort studies have shown that the addition of a progestogen in combined hormone replacement therapy (EPT) increases this risk further. Prospective, randomized controlled trials have confirmed this for the continuous combined regimen. So, why not tell our patients, “Stop using ET and EPT, it is dangerous to your health!”? The answer is: there are too many problems to allow such an oversimplified, definite statement. What is the problem? There is more than one!The problems are as follows:

• •There are many observational studies, but these are not consistent in their results.
• •Relative risk increases, if any, are small and thus often statistically non-significant.
• •Observational studies have inherent biases that cannot be corrected for; therefore evidence should come from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
• •There are no RCTs that provide evidence as to the breast cancer risk with ET, compared to EPT in the same study population.
• •In the three large RCTs available, the populations studied are: not representative, too old and without climacteric complaints, and therefore lacking any indication for postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT).
• •The data obtained thus far do not apply to non-oral routes, neglect the difference in progestogens, and do not address tibolone, a valuable alternative to classical HT in Europe.
• •And finally, are these epidemiological findings biologically plausible? Can estrogens cause breast cancer and why then does the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) RCT not find this? And how can the addition of a progestogen increase the ET risk further as progestogens are pro-apoptotic and down-regulate estrogen receptors as well as local estrogen biosynthesis?

In conclusion, we have a problem as we cannot formulate any general advice that holds for the majority of European postmenopausal women due to lack of consistency, lack of biological plausibility, and lack of relevance of randomized clinical trial data to our daily practical work.So, we have a problem and not a firm basis for undisputable statements.     

Postmenopausal testosterone therapy and breast cancer risk

Background: Testosterone therapy is being increasingly used in the management of postmenopausal women. However, as clinical trials have demonstrated a significantly increased risk of breast cancer with oral combined estrogen–progestin therapy, there is a need to ascertain the risk of including testosterone in such regimens. Objective: Evaluation of experimental and epidemiological studies pertaining to the role of testosterone in breast cancer. Design: Literature review. Setting: The Jean Hailes Foundation, Research Unit. Main Outcome Measures: Mammary epithelial proliferation, apoptosis and breast cancer. Results: In experimental studies, testosterone action is anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic, and mediated via the AR, despite the potential for testosterone to be aromatized to estrogen. Animal studies suggest that testosterone may serve as a natural, endogenous protector of the breast and limit mitogenic and cancer promoting effects of estrogen on mammary epithelium. In premenopausal women, elevated testosterone is not associated with greater breast cancer risk. The risk of breast cancer is also not increased in women with polycystic ovary syndrome who have chronic estrogen exposure and androgen excess. However, in postmenopausal women, who are oestrogen deplete and have increased adipose aromatase activity, higher testosterone has been associated with greater breast cancer risk. Conclusion: Available data indicate the inclusion of testosterone in estrogen–progestin regimens has the potential to ameliorate the stimulating effects of hormones on the breast. However, testosterone therapy alone cannot be recommended for estrogen deplete women because of the potential risk of enhanced aromatisation to estrogen in this setting.     

The role of testosterone in the management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women

At least 16 million women over the age of 50 currently experience low sexual desire, with approximately 4 million women exhibiting hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). Although early research established that testosterone therapy improves sexual desire in postmenopausal women, safer and more efficacious administration routes were explored. Large randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled studies demonstrate that transdermal testosterone improves sexual function and activity in postmenopausal women with HSDD. Large multi-center Phase III trials further confirm the positive effects of the testosterone patch in the treatment of HSDD. More recent studies are exploring the utility of testosterone gels. Based upon data from two recent clinical relevance studies, physicians can be reassured that postmenopausal women with HSDD report a meaningful benefit with testosterone therapy, and further, women will only continue therapy if they experience a meaningful benefit. Although most trials combined testosterone with estrogen/progesterone therapy, the recent APHRODITE trial examined testosterone alone, showing increased sexual desire with mild adverse events. Concerns regarding the long-term safety profile of transdermal testosterone must be addressed before the FDA will approve a testosterone product for women. Although some fear an increased risk of breast cancer with exogenous testosterone administration, recent studies support the idea that androgens can play a role in suppressing the proliferative effects of estrogen and progesterone. Long-term safety data is now being collected and analyzed and Phase III trials focusing on long-term risks are underway. In the meantime, transdermal testosterone appears to be a safe and effective therapy for postmenopausal women with HSDD [Swanson S, DeRogatis L, Snabes M, Simes S, Zborowski J. Treatment of HSDD in surgically menopausal women: a newly initiated Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of LibiGel. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, February 22–25, Orlando, FL; 2007].     

Safety of testosterone use in women

Female sexual desire appears to be in part androgen dependent, which has lead to the use of testosterone in women for low libido. Despite this benefit, the long-term safety of testosterone as a hormone replacement or therapy has not been well established. Side effects of testosterone therapy include mild and reversible acne and hirsuitism, as well as changes to the lipid profile with oral, but not transdermal testosterone. Short-term studies, up to 2 years, have shown that for serum plasma testosterone levels at the upper portion or slightly above the reference range for reproductive-aged women, testosterone does not increase the risk of hepatotoxicity, endometrial hyperplasia, or behavioral hostility. No adverse cardiovascular effects including changes in blood pressure, blood viscosity, arterial vascular reactivity, hypercoagulable states, and polycythemia have been shown. Data is mixed with outcomes of breast cancer risk, with some experimental studies suggesting a decrease in estrogen-induced breast epithelial proliferation with low dose testosterone. Additionally, models of superphysiologic testosterone levels, such as polycystic ovarian disease, have not shown an increased risk of breast cancer. As with all hormone therapy in postmenopausal women, testosterone therapy should be individualized and requires that each woman weigh the risk and benefits. Nevertheless, only long-term safety studies will provide conclusive evidence as to testosterone safety in women.     

Androgens and the breast

There is increasing interest in the role of androgens in the treatment of women but little is known about their long-term safety. There are also very few studies on testosterone therapy and breast cancer risk. However, some observations support the concept that androgens may counteract the stimulatory effects of estrogen and progestogen in the mammary gland. Mammographic breast density and breast cell proliferation could be regarded as surrogate markers for the risk of breast cancer. Recently the addition of testosterone to a common estrogen/progestogen regimen was found to inhibit the stimulatory effects of hormones on breast cell proliferation. The effects of testosterone alone on the postmenopausal breast remain to be investigated.     

Interaction between menopausal status and obesity in affecting breast cancer risk

Obesity has a complex relationship to breast cancer risk that differs in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Before the menopause, the level of adiposity is inversely related to risk, indicative of a protective effect, whereas in postmenopausal women, particularly the elderly, the association is a positive one, consistent with obesity being a risk factor. The importance of high estrogen production in adipose tissue, with consequent elevation of circulating biologically available estradiol, in the promotional effect of obesity on postmenopausal breast carcinogenesis is well established; the resulting tumors express both estrogen and progesterone receptors. The mechanism(s) for the protective effect in premenopausal women is less well understood, but the breast cancers that do develop in the presence of obesity are most often estrogen and progesterone receptor negative, consistent with the selection of non-estrogen-dependent tumor cells which are dependent on growth factors such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I and some adipokines. The influence of menopausal status on the relationships between adiposity and breast cancer appears to be modified within each category by age; the protective effect before the menopause may be limited to younger women (<35 years), and the adverse effect was found to apply specifically to older postmenopausal women. Although randomized trials of weight reduction for postmenopausal breast cancer prevention have not been performed, observational studies suggested that risk reduction does occur; in addition, other health benefits of weight control need to be considered regardless of menopausal status.     

Postmenopausal hormone replacement in the woman with a reproductive risk factor for breast cancer

Objective: to assess the interaction between postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and various reproductive risk factors for breast cancer such as early menarche, late menopause, late first delivery and nulliparity. Design: three cohort studies and fourteen case control studies, published between 1975 and 1997, provided relative risks (RRs) of HRT use in women with, as well as in those without, a reproductive risk factor for breast cancer. Methods: using an additive RR model reported before, we investigated whether the RR for breast cancer in women with a combination of HRT and a given reproductive risk factor result from a simple addition of RRs of HRT on the one hand, and of the pre-existing reproductive risk factor on the other hand, or that synergism between both risk factors occurs. Results: simple addition of RRs was shown in the case of early menarche and late menopause. Less increase of risk, suggesting antagonism, was found for both late first delivery and nulliparity in combination with HRT use. Conclusion: we could not observe any synergistic effect of the combined risks of any of the following reproductive risk factors for breast cancer: early menarche, late menopause, late first delivery or nulliparity on the one hand, with the risk resulting from HRT use on the other hand. Therefore, as far as the risk of breast cancer is concerned, the use of HRT appears not to be highly detrimental in women with a reproductive breast cancer risk factor, as it results in not more than a simple addition of risks at the most.     

Controversies about HRT--lessons from monkey models

Lessons from monkey models contribute significantly to a better understanding of the controversies in reconciling the differences in postmenopausal hormone treatment outcomes between observational and randomized trial data. Monkey studies brought attention to premenopausal estrogen deficiency with resulting premature coronary artery atherosclerosis. Recently, those monkey studies were confirmed for premenopausal women in the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. Monkey studies have provided convincing evidence for the primary prevention of coronary artery atherosclerosis when estrogens are administered soon after the development of estrogen deficiency. Equally convincing are the data from monkey studies indicating the total loss of these estrogens beneficial effects if treatment is delayed for a period equal to six postmenopausal years for women. An attempt has been made using the monkey model to identify the hormone treatment regimen most effective in preventing the progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis. By a substantial margin, the most effective approach is that of using estrogen containing oral contraceptive during the perimenopausal transition, followed directly by hormone replacement therapy postmenopausally. Because of similarities between human and nonhuman breast, monkeys have had a major role in clarifying controversies surrounding the breast cancer risk of estrogen only versus estrogen plus progestin therapies. The results of monkey studies suggest little or no effects of estrogen only treatment; whereas, estrogen+progestin clearly increases breast cancer risk.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer

Numerous studies on oestrogen replacement therapy have failed to incriminate the use of exogenous oestrogen as a cause of breast cancer in post-menopausal women. Since so many variables influence breast cancer risk, it has not been possible for any single study to evaluate every potential risk factor included in the epidemiological and clinical reports on hormone use and carcinoma of the breast. The relative risk (RR) for breast cancer in oestrogen users has been found to vary from 0.4 to 3.4, with the vast majority of investigators reporting an RR very close to 1.0, or no increased risk at all. There is growing evidence that progesterone deficiency may increase the risk for breast cancer in some women. At least three studies have indicated that the addition of progestogen to oestrogen replacement therapy may significantly decrease the risk for carcinoma of the breast. It was observed that the RR of breast cancer varied from 0.47 to 0.89 in these studies when oestrogen-progestogen users were compared with unopposed oestrogen users. However, it is pointed out that progestogens are not added to oestrogen replacement therapy to negate an increased risk of breast cancer from unopposed oestrogens, since oestrogen therapy does not increase the risk. Combination oestrogen-progestogen therapy is recommended for hormone replacement treatment, even in women who have had a hysterectomy, because it will reduce the risk for breast cancer in some women.     

Prior hormone therapy and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which prior hormone therapy modifies the breast cancer risk found with estrogen plus progestin (E+P) in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial. METHODS: Subgroup analyses of prior hormone use on invasive breast cancer incidence in 16,608 postmenopausal women in the WHI randomized trial of E+P over an average 5.6 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Small but statistically significant differences were found between prior HT users and non-users for most breast cancer risk factors but Gail risk scores were similar. Duration of E+P use within the trial (mean 4.4 years, S.D. 2.0) did not vary by prior use. Among 4311 prior users, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for E+P versus placebo was 1.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-3.27), significantly different (p=0.03) from that among 12,297 never users (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.77-1.36). The interaction between study arm and follow-up time was significant overall (p=0.01) and among never users (p=0.02) but not among prior users (p=0.10). The cumulative incidence over time for the E+P and placebo groups appeared to cross after about 3 years in prior users, and after about 5 years in women with no prior use. No interaction was found with duration (p=0.08) or recency of prior use (p=0.17). Prior hormone use significantly increased the E+P hazard ratio for larger, more advanced tumors. CONCLUSION: A safe interval for combined hormone use could not be reliably defined with these data. However, the significant increase in breast cancer risk in the trial overall after only 5.6 years of follow-up, initially concentrated in women with prior hormone exposure, but with increasing risk over time in women without prior exposure, suggests that durations only slightly longer than those in the WHI trial are associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Longer-term exposure and follow-up data are needed.     

Estrogen replacement therapy and gallbladder disease in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of estrogen replacement therapy on the development of gallbladder disease in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Systematic review of the English literature was conducted. All studies that addressed the association between hormone replacement therapy and gallbladder disease published from 1970 to the present were reviewed. RESULTS: Seven observational studies, two clinical trials, two case series, and one nonrandomized and three randomized investigations were reviewed. The results of each study were reported and analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women increased the chances for gallstone formation.     

Breast cancer risk with postmenopausal hormonal treatment

This review was designed to determine from the best evidence whether there is an association between postmenopausal hormonal treatment and breast cancer risk. Also, if there is an association, does it vary according to duration and cessation of use, type of regimen, type of hormonal product or route of administration; whether there is a differential effect on risk of lobular and ductal cancer; and whether hormone treatment is associated with breast cancers that have better prognostic factors? Data sources for the review included Medline, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, 2005) and reference lists in the identified citations. Eligible citations addressed invasive breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women and involved use of the estrogen products with or without progestin that are used as treatment for menopausal symptoms. Abstracted data were demographic groupings, categories of hormone use, categories of breast cancer, two-by-two tables of exposure and outcome and adjusted odds ratios, relative risks (RRs) or hazard rates. Average estimates of risk were weighted by the inverse variance method, or if heterogeneous, using a random effects model. The average risk of invasive breast cancer with estrogen use was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.61-1.02] in four randomized trials involving 12 643 women. The average breast cancer risk with estrogen-progestin use was 1.24 (95% CI = 1.03-1.50) in four randomized trials involving 19 756 women. The average risks reported in recent epidemiological studies were higher: 1.18 (95% CI = 1.01-1.38) with current use of estrogen alone and 1.70 (95% CI = 1.36-2.17) with current use of estrogen-progestin. The association of breast cancer with current use was stronger than the association with ever use, which includes past use. For past use, the increased breast cancer risk diminished soon after discontinuing hormones and normalized within 5 years. Reasonably adequate data do not show that breast cancer risk varies significantly with different types of estrogen or progestin preparations, lower dosages or different routes of administration, although there is a small difference between sequential and continuous progestin regimens. Epidemiological studies indicate that estrogen-progestin use increases risk of lobular more than ductal breast cancer, but the number of studies and cases of lobular cancer remains limited. Among important prognostic factors, the stage and grade in breast cancers associated with hormone use [corrected] do not differ significantly from those in non-users, but breast cancers in estrogen-progestin users are significantly more likely to be estrogen receptor (ER) positive. In conclusion, valid evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicates that breast cancer risk is increased with estrogen-progestin use more than with estrogen alone. Epidemiological evidence involving more than 1.5 million women agrees broadly with the trial findings. Although new studies are unlikely to alter the key findings about overall breast cancer risk, research is needed, however, to determine the role of progestin, evaluate the risk of lobular cancer and delineate effects of hormone use on receptor presence, prognosis and mortality in breast cancer.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of breast cancer: the view of an epidemiologist

OBJECTIVES: Postmenopausal hormone therapy (PMH) has been widely used by menopausal women living in western countries for the past several decades. Numerous studies have evaluated the relationship between PMH and breast cancer risk because steroid hormones have been implicated in breast cancer etiology. METHODS: A review of selected studies was performed to evaluate the history of investigations of the association between PMH and breast cancer, with a focus on studies evaluating different PMH regimens and different histologic types of breast cancer. RESULTS: Though studies conducted before the early 1990s suggest that both combined estrogen and progestin (E + P) PMH and unopposed estrogen (E) PMH are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, more recent observational studies suggest that E + P, particularly current use for 5 years or longer, is more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than is unopposed E. Results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trials have confirmed these findings as they indicate that E + P is causally related to breast cancer (relative risk (RR) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.54), while E alone is not (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is clear and consistent evidence that use of E + P increases a woman's risk of breast cancer. Alternatively, current evidence suggests that use of unopposed E is not as strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Further studies are needed though to examine how different PMH regimens, doses, and methods of delivery are related to breast cancer risk, and how PMH impacts the risks of different types of breast cancer.     

Postmenopausal hormone therapy in clinical perspective

Although many of the risks and benefits of postmenopausal hormone therapy are known, only recently has the magnitude of these effects and their perspective to other therapies become more fully understood. Careful review of randomized controlled trials indicates that the risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy including breast cancer, stroke and venous thromboembolism are similar to other commonly used agents. Overall, these risks are rare (less than 1 event per 1,000 women) and even rarer when initiated in women less than 60 years of age or within 10 years of menopause. In addition, the literature indicates similar benefit of postmenopausal hormone therapy, in women who initiate hormone therapy in close proximity to menopause, to other medications used for the primary prevention of coronory heart disease in women.     

Testosterone inhibits estrogen/progestogen-induced breast cell proliferation in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: During the past few years serious concern has been raised about the safety of combined estrogen/progestogen hormone therapy, in particular about its effects on the breast. Several observations suggest that androgens may counteract the proliferative effects of estrogen and progestogen in the mammary gland. Thus, we aimed to study the effects of testosterone addition on breast cell proliferation during postmenopausal estrogen/progestogen therapy. DESIGN: We conducted a 6-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 99 postmenopausal women were given continuous combined estradiol 2 mg/norethisterone acetate 1 mg and were equally randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with either a testosterone patch releasing 300 microg/24 hours or a placebo patch. Breast cells were collected by fine needle aspiration biopsy at baseline and after 6 months, and the main outcome measure was the percentage of proliferating breast cells positively stained by the Ki-67/MIB-1 antibody. RESULTS: A total of 88 women, 47 receiving active treatment and 41 in the placebo group, completed the study. In the placebo group there was a more than fivefold increase (P<0.001) in total breast cell proliferation from baseline (median 1.1%) to 6 months (median 6.2%). During testosterone addition, no significant increase was recorded (1.6% vs 2.0%). The different effects of the two treatments were apparent in both epithelial and stromal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of testosterone may counteract breast cell proliferation as induced by estrogen/progestogen therapy in postmenopausal women.     

Reduced breast cancer incidence in women treated with subcutaneous testosterone,or testosterone with anastrozole: A prospective,observational study

Objectives

There is evidence that androgens are breast protective and that testosterone therapy treats many symptoms of hormone deficiency in both pre and postmenopausal patients. However, unlike estrogen and progestins, there is a paucity of data regarding the incidence of breast cancer in women treated with testosterone therapy. This study was designed to investigate the incidence of breast cancer in women treated with subcutaneous testosterone therapy in the absence of systemic estrogen therapy.

Study design

This is a 5-year interim analysis of a 10-year, prospective, observational, IRB approved study investigating the incidence of breast cancer in women presenting with symptoms of hormone deficiency treated with subcutaneous testosterone (T) implants or, T combined with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (A), i.e., T + A implants. Breast cancer incidence was compared with that of historical controls reported in the literature, age specific Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) incidence rates, and a representative, similar age group of our patients used as a ‘control’ group. The effect of adherence to T therapy was also evaluated.

Results

Since March 2008, 1268 pre and post menopausal women have been enrolled in the study and eligible for analysis. As of March 2013, there have been 8 cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed in 5642 person-years of follow up for an incidence of 142 cases per 100 000 person-years, substantially less than the age-specific SEER incidence rates (293/100 000), placebo arm of Women's Health Initiative Study (300/100 000), never users of hormone therapy from the Million Women Study (325/100 000) and our control group (390/100 000). Unlike adherence to estrogen therapy, adherence to T therapy further decreased the incidence of breast cancer (73/100 000).

Conclusion

T and/or T + A, delivered subcutaneously as a pellet implant, reduced the incidence of breast cancer in pre and postmenopausal women. Evidence supports that breast cancer is preventable by maintaining a T to estrogen ratio in favor of T and, in particular, by the use of continuous T or, when indicated, T + A. This hormone therapy should be further investigated for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer.