Validating the bipolar spectrum in the French National EPIDEP Study: overview of the phenomenology and relative prevalence of its clinical prototypes

BACKGROUND: Few studies have been undertaken to ascertain the feasibility of using the bipolar (BP) spectrum in clinical practice. The only systematic national study is the French EPIDEP Study of consecutive inpatients and outpatients presenting with major depressive episodes (MDE). The protocol was developed in 1994 and implemented in 1995; publication of its first data began in 1998. This report provides the complete data set of the EPIDEP. METHODS: Forty-eight psychiatrists, practicing in 15 sites in four regions of France (Paris, Besan?on, Bordeaux and Marseille), were all trained on a common protocol based on DSM-IV criteria for MDE (n=537) subdivided into BP-I (history of mania), BP-II (history of hypomania), as well as extended definitions of the "softer spectrum" beyond BP-I and BP-II. Measures tapping into this spectrum included the Hypomania Checklist (HCA), the cyclothymic (CT), depressive (DT) and hyperthymic (HT) temperament scales. These measures and course permitted post-hoc assignment of MDE in the bipolar spectrum, based in part on the Akiskal, H.S., Pinto, O., 1999. [The evolving bipolar spectrum: Prototypes I, II, III, IV. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 22, 517-534] proposal: depression with history of spontaneous hypomanic episodes (DSM-IV, BP-II), cyclothymic depressions (BP-II(1/2)), antidepressant-associated hypomania (BP-III) and hyperthymic depressions (BP-IV). was thereby limited to an exclusion diagnosis for the remainder of MDE. LIMITATION: In the clinical setting, psychiatrists cannot be entirely blind to the observations in the various clinical evaluations and instruments. However, the systematic multisite collection of such data tended to minimize any such biases. RESULTS: After excluding patients lost to follow-up, among 493 presenting with MDE with complete data files, the BP-II rate was estimated at index at 20%; 1 month later, systematic probing for hypomania doubled the rate of BP-II to 39%. The comparison between BP-II and UP showed differential phenomenology, such as hypersomnia, increased psychomotor activation, guilt feelings and suicidal thoughts in BP-II. Related data demonstrated the importance of CT in further qualifying of MDE to define a distinct, more severe ("darker") BP-II(1/2) variant of BP-II. Moreover, BP-III, arising from DT and associated with antidepressants, emerged as a valid soft bipolar variant on the basis of the phenomenology of hypomania and bipolar family history. Finally, we found preliminary evidence for the inclusion of BP-IV into the bipolar spectrum, its total hypomania score falling intermediate between BP-II and strict UP. Using this broader diagnostic framework, the bipolar spectrum (the combined "hard" BP-I phenotype, BP-II and the soft spectrum) accounted for 65% of MDE. CONCLUSION: The EPIDEP study achieved its objectives by demonstrating the feasibility of identifying the bipolar spectrum at a national level, and refining its phenomenology through rigorous clinical characterization and validation of bipolar spectrum subtypes, including MDE with brief hypomanias, cyclothymia and hyperthymia. The spectrum accounted for two out of three MDE, making "strict UP" less prevalent than BP as redefined herein. Our findings were anticipated by Falret, who in 1854 had predicted that many melancholic patients in the community would 1 day be classified in his circular group. We also confirmed Baillarger's observation in the same year that episodes (in this study, hypomanic episodes) could last as short as 2 days. Our findings deriving from a systematic French national database a century and a half later invite major shifts in clinical and public health services, as well as in the future conduct of psychopharmacologic trials. In this respect, the systematic training of clinicians in four regions of France represents a national resource for affective disorders and can serve as a model to effect change in diagnostic practice in other countries.     

Factor structure of hypomania: interrelationships with cyclothymia and the soft bipolar spectrum

BACKGROUND: No systematic data exists on the phenomenology and psychometric aspects of hypomania. In this report we focus on the factor structure of hypomania and its relationships with cyclothymic temperament in unipolar (UP) and bipolar II (BP-II) spectrum (soft bipolar) patients. METHOD: The combined sample of UP and BP-II spectrum patients (n=427) derives from the French National multi-center study (EPIDEP). The study involved training 48 psychiatrists at 15 sites in France in a protocol based on DSM-IV phenomenological criteria for major depressive disorder, hypomania, and BP-II, as well as a broadened definition of soft bipolarity. Psychometric measures included Angst's Hypomania Checklist (HCA) and Akiskal's Cyclothymic Temperament (CT) Questionnaires. RESULTS: In the combined sample of the UP and BP-II spectrum, the factor pattern based on the HCA was characterized by the presence of one hypomanic component. In the soft bipolar group (n=191), two components were identified before and after varimax rotation. The first factor (F-1) identified hypomania with positive (driven-euphoric) features, and the second factor (F-2) hypomania with greater irritability and risk-taking. In exploratory analyses, both factors of hypomania tentatively distinguished most soft BP subtypes from UP. However, F-1 was generic across the soft spectrum, whereas F-2 was rather specific for II-1/2 (i.e., BP-II arising from CT). CT, which was found to conform to a single factor among the soft bipolar patients, was significantly correlated only with irritable risk-taking hypomania (F-2). LIMITATION: In a study conducted in a clinical setting, psychiatrists cannot be kept blind of the data revealed in the various clinical evaluations and instruments. However, the systematic collection of all data tended to minimize biases. CONCLUSION: EPIDEP data revealed a dual structure of hypomania with 'classic' driven-euphoric contrasted with irritable risk-taking expressions distributed differentially across the soft bipolar spectrum. Only the latter correlated significantly with cyclothymic temperament, suggesting the hypothesis that repeated brief swings into hypomania tend to destabilize soft bipolar conditions.     

Validating antidepressant-associated hypomania (bipolar III): a systematic comparison with spontaneous hypomania (bipolar II)

BACKGROUND: According to DSM-IV and ICD-10, hypomania which occurs solely during antidepressant treatment does not belong to the category of bipolar II (BP-II). METHODS: As part of the EPIDEP National Multisite French Study of 493 consecutive DSM-IV major depressive patients evaluated in at least two semi-structured interviews 1 month apart, 144 (29.2%) fulfilled the criteria for bipolar II with spontaneous hypomania (BP-II Sp), and 52 (10.5%) had hypomania associated solely with antidepressants (BP-H AA). RESULTS: BP-II Sp group had earlier age at onset, more hypomanic episodes, and higher ratings on cyclothymic and hyperthymic temperaments, and abused alcohol more often. The two groups were indistinguishable on the hypomania checklist score (12.2+/-4.0 vs. 11.4+/-4.4, respectively, P=0.25) and on rates of familial bipolarity (14.1% vs. 11.8%, respectively, P=0.68). But BP-H AA had significantly more family history of suicide, had higher ratings on depressive temperament, with greater chronicity of depression, were more likely to be admitted to the hospital for suicidal depressions, and were more likely to have psychotic features; finally, clinicians were more likely to treat them with ECT, lithium and mood stabilizing anticonvulsants. LIMITATION: Naturalistic study, where treatment was uncontrolled. CONCLUSION: BP-H AA emerges as a disorder with depressive temperamental instability, manifesting hypomania later in life (and, by definition, during pharmacotherapy only). By the standards of clinicians who have taken care of these patients for long periods of time, BP-H AA appears as no less bipolar than those with prototypical BP-II. We submit that familial bipolarity ('genotypic' bipolarity) strongly favors their inclusion within the realm of bipolar II spectrum, as a prognostically less favorable depression-prone phenotype of this disorder, and which is susceptible to destabilization under antidepressant treatment. These considerations argue for revisions of DSM-IV and ICD-10 conventions. BP-HAA may represent a genetically less penetrant expression of BP-II; phenotypically; it might provisionally be categorized as bipolar III.     

Cyclothymic OCD: a distinct form?

BACKGROUND: Clinical research on the comorbidity of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and other anxiety disorders has largely focused on depression. However in practice, resistant or severe OCD patients not infrequently suffer from a masked or hidden comorbid bipolar disorder. METHOD: The rate of bipolar comorbidity in OCD was systematically explored among 453 members of the French Association of patients suffering from OCD (AFTOC) as well as a psychiatric sample of OCD out-patients (n=175). As previous research by us has shown the epidemiologic and clinical sample to be similar, we combined them in the present analyses (n=628). To assess mood disorder comorbidity, we used structured self-rated questionnaires for major depression, hypomania and mania (DSM-IV criteria), self-rated Angst's checklist of Hypomania and that for the Cyclothymic Temperament (French version developed by Akiskal and Hantouche). RESULTS: According to DSM-IV definitions of hypomania/mania, 11% of the total combined sample was classified as bipolar (3% BP-I and 8% BP-II). When dimensionally rated, 30% obtained a cut-off score >/=10 on the Hypomania checklist and 50% were classified as cyclothymic. Comparative analyses were conducted between OCD with (n=302) versus without cyclothymia (n=272). In contrast to non-cyclothymics, the cyclothymic OCD patients were characterized by more severe OCD syndromes (higher frequencies of aggressive, impulsive, religious and sexual obsessions, compulsions of control, hoarding, repetition); more episodic course; greater rates of manic/hypomanic and major depressive episodes (with higher intensity and recurrence) associated with higher rates of suicide attempts and psychiatric admissions; and finally, a less favorable response to anti-OCD antidepressants and elevated rate of mood switching with aggressive behavior. LIMITATION: Hypomania and cyclothymia were not confirmed by diagnostic interview by a clinician. CONCLUSION: Our data extend previous research on "OCD-bipolar comorbidity" as a highly prevalent and largely under-recognized and untreated class of OCD patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that "cyclothymic OCD" could represent a distinct form of OCD. More attention should be paid to it in research and clinical practice.     

The DSM-IV and ICD-10 categories of recurrent [major] depressive and bipolar II disorders: evidence that they lie on a dimensional spectrum

BACKGROUND: Presently it is a hotly debated issue whether unipolar and bipolar disorders are categorically distinct or lie on a spectrum. We used the ongoing Ravenna-San Diego Collaboration database to examine this question with respect to major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar II (BP-II). METHODS: The study population in FB's Italian private practice setting comprised consecutive 650 outpatients presenting with major depressive episode (MDE) and ascertained by a modified version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Differential assignment of patients into MDD versus BP-II was made on the basis of discrete hypomanic episodes outside the timeframe of an MDE. In addition, hypomanic signs and symptoms during MDE (intra-MDE hypomania) were systematically assessed and graded by the Hypomania Interview Guide (HIG). The frequency distributions of the HIG total scores in each of the MDD, BP-II and the combined entire sample were plotted using the kernel density estimate. Finally, bipolar family history (BFH) was investigated by structured interview (the Family History Screen). RESULTS: There were 261 MDD and 389 BP-II. As in the previous smaller samples, categorically defined BP-II compared with MDD had significantly earlier age at onset, higher rates of familial bipolarity (mostly BP-II), history of MDE recurrences (>or=5), and atypical features. However, examining hypomania scores dimensionally, whether we examined the MDD, BP-II, or the combined sample, kernel density estimate distribution of these scores had a normal-like shape (i.e., no bimodality). Also, in the combined sample of MDE, we found a dose-response relationship between BFH loading and intra-MDE hypomania measured by HIG scores. LIMITATIONS: Although the interviewer (FB) could not be blind to the diagnostic status of his private patients, the systematic rigorous interview process in a very large clinical population minimized any unintended biases. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous studies that have examined the number of DSM-IV hypomanic signs and symptoms both outside and during MDE, the present analyses relied on the more precise hypomania scores as measured by the HIG. The finding of a dose-response relationship between BFH and HIG scores in the sample at large strongly suggests a continuity between BP-II and MDD. Our data indicate that even in those clinically depressed patients without past hypomanic episodes (so-called "unipolar" MDD), such scores are normally rather than bimodally distributed during MDE. Moreover, the absence of a 'zone of rarity' in the distribution of hypomanic scores in the combined total, MDD and BP-II MDE samples, indicates that MDD and BP-II exist on a dimensional spectrum. From a nosologic perspective, our data are contrary to what one would expect from a categorical unipolar-bipolar distinction. In practical terms, intra-MDE hypomania and BFH, especially in recurrent MDD, represent strong indicators of bipolarity.     

Bipolar II with and without cyclothymic temperament: "dark" and "sunny" expressions of soft bipolarity

BACKGROUND: In the present report deriving from the French national multi-site EPIDEP study, we focus on the characteristics of Bipolar II (BP-II), divided on the basis of cyclothymic temperament (CT). In our companion article (Hantouche et al., this issue), we found that this temperament in its self-rated version correlated significantly with hypomanic behavior of a risk-taking nature. Our aim in the present analyses is to further test the hypothesis that such patients-assigned to CT on the basis of clinical interview-represent a more "unstable" variant of BP-II. METHODS: From a total major depressive population of 537 psychiatric patients, 493 were re-examined on average a month later; after excluding 256 DSM-IV MDD and 41 with history of mania, the remaining 196 were placed in the BP-II spectrum. As mounting international evidence indicates that hypomania associated with antidepressants belongs to this spectrum, such association per se did not constitute a ground for exclusion. CT was assessed by clinicians using a semi-structured interview based on in its French version; as two files did not contain full interview data on CT, the critical clinical variable in the present analyses, this left us with an analysis sample of 194 BP-II. Socio-demographic, psychometric, clinical, familial and historical parameters were compared between BP-II subdivided by CT. Psychometric measures included self-rated CT and hypomania scales, as well as Hamilton and Rosenthal scales for depression. RESULTS: BP-II cases categorically assigned to CT (n=74) versus those without CT (n=120), were differentiated as follows: (1). younger age at onset (P=0.005) and age at seeking help (P=0.05); (2). higher scores on HAM-D (P=0.03) and Rosenthal (atypical depressive) scale (P=0.007); (3). longer delay between onset of illness and recognition of bipolarity (P=0.0002); (4). higher rate of psychiatric comorbidity (P=0.04); (5). different profiles on axis II (i.e., more histrionic, passive-aggressive and less obsessive-compulsive personality disorders). Family history for depressive and bipolar disorders did not significantly distinguish the two groups; however, chronic affective syndromes were significantly higher in BP-II with CT. Finally, cyclothymic BP-II scored significantly much higher on irritable-risk-taking than "classic" driven-euphoric items of hypomania. CONCLUSION: Depressions arising from a cyclothymic temperament-even when meeting full criteria for hypomania-are likely to be misdiagnosed as personality disorders. Their high familial load for affective disorders (including that for bipolar disorder) validate the bipolar nature of these "cyclothymic depressions." Our data support their inclusion as a more "unstable" variant of BP-II, which we have elsewhere termed "BP-II 1/2." These patients can best be characterized as the "darker" expression of the more prototypical "sunny" BP-II phenotype. Coupled with the data from our companion paper (Hantouche et al., 2003, this issue), the present findings indicate that screening for cyclothymia in major depressive patients represents a viable approach for detecting a bipolar subtype that could otherwise be mistaken for an erratic personality disorder. Overall, our findings support recent international consensus in favoring the diagnosis of cyclothymic and bipolar II disorders over erratic and borderline personality disorders when criteria for both sets of disorders are concurrently met.     

Bipolar II vs. unipolar depression: psychopathologic differentiation by dimensional measures

BACKGROUND: Clinical presentations of depression in bipolar disorder are varied, inconsistent and often confusing. Most previous studies have focused on bipolar I (BP-I). Given that bipolar II (BP-II) is the more common bipolar phenotype, which is often confused with unipolar (UP), the aim of the current analyses is to delineate the symptomalogic differences between BP II vs. UP MDD in a large national sample. METHODS: The data derived from the French National EPIDEP study (n = 452 DSM-IV major depressives), subdivided into BP-II (n = 196) and UP (n = 256). The BP II group included major depressives with both spontaneous and antidepressant-associated hypomania based on our finding of similarity in rates of familial bipolarity in the two subgroups. At index presentation, depression was assessed by the clinician (using HAM-D and the Rosenthal Atypical Depression Scale) and by the patient (using the Multi-Visual Analog Scale of Bipolarity, MVAS-BP). Principal component analyses (PCA with varimax rotation) were conducted on HAM-D and MVAS-BP in the total population and separately in BP-II and UP. We performed inter-group comparative tests (UP vs. BP-II) on factorial scores derived from PCAs and correlation tests between these factorial scores. RESULTS: The PCA on "HAM-D + Rosenthal scale" showed the presence of nine major factors: F1-2 "weight changes", F3-4 "sleep disturbances", F5 "sadness-guilt", F6 "retardation-fatigue", F7 "somatic", F8 "diurnal variation" and F9 "insight-delusion". The PCA on MVAS-BP revealed the presence of eight principal components: F1 "psychomotor retardation", F2 "central pain", F3 "somatic", F4 "social contact", F5 "worry", F6 "loss of interest", F7 "guilt" and F8 "anger". Despite uniformity in global intensity of depression, significant differences were observed as follows: higher score on "psychomotor retardation" (p = 0.03), "loss of interest" (p = 0.057) and "insomnia" (p = 0.05) in the UP group, and higher score on "hypersomnia" (p = 0.008) in the BP-II group. Correlation analyses between clinician- and self-rating revealed the presence of higher number of significant coefficients in the UP vs. BP-II group (p < or =0.001). LIMITATION: A three-way comparison between BP-I, BP-II and UP may have yielded somewhat different results. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate greater psychomotor retardation, stability and uniformity in the clinical picture of strictly defined UP depression. By contrast, bipolar II depression appeared to be characterized, despite the hypersomnic tendency, by psychomotor activation. This would indicate greater mixed features than those observed in UP. Moreover, in BP-II, there was less agreement between clinician vs. self-rating on the presence of various features of depression. Taken together, these findings explain why BP-II depression is missed by clinicians as a genuine depression.     

Validating affective temperaments in their subaffective and socially positive attributes: psychometric, clinical and familial data from a French national study

BACKGROUND: One of the major objectives of the French National EPIDEP Study was to show the feasibility of systematic assessment of bipolar II (BP-II) disorder and beyond. In this report we focus on the utility of the affective temperament scales (ATS) in delineating this spectrum in its clinical as well as socially desirable expressions. METHODS: Forty-two psychiatrists working in 15 sites in four regions of France made semi-structured diagnoses based on DSM IV criteria in a sample of 452 consecutive major depressive episode (MDE) patients (from which bipolar I had been removed). At least 1 month after entry into the study (when the acute depressive phase had abated), they assessed affective temperaments by using a French version of the precursor of the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego (TEMPS). Principal component analyses (PCA) were conducted on hyperthymic (HYP-T), depressive (DEP-T) and cyclothymic (CYC-T) temperament subscales as assessed by clinicians, and on a self-rated cyclothymic temperament (CYC-TSR). Scores on each of the temperament subscales were compared in unipolar (UP) major depressive disorder versus BP-II patients, and in the entire sample subdivided on the basis of family history of bipolarity. RESULTS: PCAs showed the presence of a global major factor for each clinician-rated subscale with respective eigenvalues of the correlation matrices as follows: 7.1 for HYP-T, 6.0 for DEP-T, and 4.7 for CYC-T. Likewise, on the self-rated CYC-TSR, the PCA revealed one global factor (with an eigenvalue of 6.6). Each of these factors represented a melange of both affect-laden and adaptive traits. The scores obtained on clinician and self-ratings of CYC-T were highly correlated (r=0.71). The scores of HYP-T and CYC-T were significantly higher in the BP-II group, and DEP-T in the UP group (P<0.001). Finally, CYC-T scores were significantly higher in patients with a family history of bipolarity. CONCLUSION: These data uphold the validity of the affective temperaments under investigation in terms of face, construct, clinical and family history validity. Despite uniformity of depressive severity at entry into the EPIDEP study, significant differences on ATS assessment were observed between UP and BP-II patients in this large national cohort. Self-rating of cyclothymia proved reliable. Adding the affective temperaments-in particular, the cyclothymic-to conventional assessment methods of depression, a more enriched portrait of mood disorders emerges. More provocatively, our data reveal socially positive traits in clinically recovering patients with mood disorders.     

Toward a definition of a cyclothymic behavioral endophenotype: which traits tap the familial diathesis for bipolar II disorder?

BACKGROUND: Although the cyclothymic temperament appears to be related to the familial diathesis of bipolar disorder, exhibiting high sensitivity for bipolar II (BP-II) disorder, it is presently uncertain which of its constituent traits are specific for this disorder. METHODS: In a sample of 446 major depressive patients (BP-II and unipolar), in the French National EPIDEP study, the cyclothymic temperament was assessed by using clinician- and self-rated scales. We computed the frequency of individual traits and relative risk for family history of bipolarity. RESULTS: From both clinician- and self-rated scales, four items related to mood reactivity, energy, psychomotor and mental activity were significantly highly represented in the subgroup with positive family history of bipolarity. The item "rapid shifts in mood and energy" obtained the highest relative risk (OR=3.42) for positive family history of bipolarity. CONCLUSION: These findings delineate those cyclothymic traits which are most likely to tap a familial-genetic diathesis for BP-II, thereby identifying traits which can best serve as a behavioral endophenotype for this bipolar subtype. Such an endophenotype might underlie the cyclic course of bipolar disorder first described in France 150 years ago by Falret and Baillarger.     

The high prevalence of bipolar II and associated cyclothymic and hyperthymic temperaments in HIV-patients

Background: Although recent studies have shown high rates of current and lifetime depression in HIV-infected patients, there is little systematic data on the occurrence of bipolarity in these patients. Method: We compared 46 HIV patients with index major depressive episode (MDE) to an equal number of age- and sex-matched seronegative MDE patients, and systematically examined rates of DSM-III-R bipolar subtypes (enriched in accordance with Akiskal's system of classifying soft bipolar disorders). Results: Although HIV and psychiatric clinic patients had comparable background in terms of familial affective loading, HIV patients had significantly higher familial rates for alcohol and substance use. The more important finding was the significantly higher proportion of HIV patients with lifetime bipolar II disorder (78%), and associated cyclothymic (52%) and hyperthymic (35%) temperaments; the findings were the same irrespective of HIV risk status (intravenous drug user vs. homosexual and other risk groups combined). Limitations: The major methodologic limitation of our study is that clinicians evaluating temperament were not blind to affective diagnoses and family history. The comparison affective group was a sample of convenience drawn from the same tertiary care university facility. Conclusion: The finding of a high rate of bipolar II disorder in HIV patients has treatment implications for seropositive patients presenting with depression. More provocatively, we submit that premorbid impulsive risk-taking traits associated with cyclothymic and hyperthymic temperaments may have played an important role in needle-sharing drug use and/or unprotected sexual behavior, leading ultimately to infection with HIV. Given their public health importance, these clinical findings and insights merit further investigation. In particular, systematic case-control studies, as well as other large scale studies with prospective methodology need to be conducted.     

How best to identify a bipolar-related subtype among major depressive patients without spontaneous hypomania: superiority of age at onset criterion over recurrence and polarity?

BACKGROUND: History of high depressive recurrence (without history of mania/hypomania) has been proposed as a mood subtype close to bipolar disorders. Herein we test whether this is the best approach to this question. METHODS: We systematically evaluated consecutive 224 Major Depressive (MDD) and 336 Bipolar II Disorders (BP-II) outpatients in a private practice, by the SCID for DSM-IV (modified for better probing hypomania by Akiskal and Benazzi [Akiskal, H.S., Benazzi, F., 2005. Optimizing the detection of bipolar II disorder in outpatient private practice: toward a systematization of clinical diagnostic wisdom. J. Clin. Psychiatry 66, 914-921]). We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses on such putative bipolar validators as early age at onset of first major depressive episode (before 21 years), high recurrence, family history for bipolar disorders, and depressive mixed states (mixed depression, i.e. depression plus concurrent hypomanic symptoms), in order to identify an MDD subgroup close to BP-II. RESULTS: All bipolar validators were independent predictors of BP-II. Early onset was the only variable which identified an MDD subgroup significantly associated with all bipolar validators. This MDD subgroup was similar to BP-II on age at onset and bipolar family history, and had a high frequency of mixed depression. A dose-response relationship was found between number of bipolar validators present in MDD, and bipolar family history loading among MDD relatives. LIMITATIONS: Study limited to outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: From among the bipolar validators, early age at onset of first major depression (<21 years) was superior to high recurrence (>4 depressive episodes) in identifying an MDD subgroup close to BP-II, which might be subsumed under the broad bipolar spectrum. Implications of unipolar-bipolar boundaries and genetic investigations are discussed.     

Atypical depression: a variant of bipolar II or a bridge between unipolar and bipolar II?

BACKGROUND: Although increasing data link atypical depression (AD) to the bipolar spectrum, controversies abound about the extent of the overlap. In particular, the Columbia group, which has pioneered in providing data on operational clarity and pharmacological specificity of atypical depressions, has nonetheless consistently avoided studying its discriminatory validity from bipolar II (BP-II). Accordingly, we undertook a full scale validation of such a link in a large clinical sample of BP-II and unipolar (UP) major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Consecutive 348 BP-II and 254 MDD outpatients presenting with major depressive episodes (MDE) were interviewed off psychoactive drugs with a modified Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the structured Family History Screen and the Hypomania Interview Guide. We used the DSM-IV criteria for "atypical features" specifier. Depressive mixed state was defined as > or =3 concurrent hypomanic signs and symptoms during MDE. Bipolar validators were age at onset, high depressive recurrence, depressive mixed state and bipolar family history (types I and II). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine associations and control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Frequency of AD was 43.0% in the combined BP-II and MDD sample. AD, versus non-AD, had significantly higher rates of BP-II. AD was significantly associated with all bipolar validators, among which family history was the most robust. A dose-response relationship was found between number of atypical symptoms during MDE and bipolar family history loading. The association between bipolar family history and number of atypical symptoms remained significant after controlling for the confounding effect of BP-II. Bipolar family history was strongly associated with the atypical symptoms of leaden paralysis and hypersomnia. CONCLUSION: These results confirm a strong link between AD and bipolar validators along psychopathologic and familial grounds. From a practical standpoint, AD is best viewed as a variant of BP-II. Clinicians confronted with MDE patients presenting with atypical features should strongly consider a BP-II diagnosis. In a more hypothetical vein, atypicality-or some associated features thereof-might serve as a nosologic bridge between UP and BP-II.     

Searching for behavioral indicators of bipolar II in patients presenting with major depressive episodes: the "red sign," the "rule of three" and other biographic signs of temperamental extravagance, activation and hypomania

BACKGROUND: Since 1977, the work of the author has shown the primacy of behavioral activation, flamboyance, and extravagance in detecting hypomania, the historical hallmark of cyclothymic and the broader spectrum of bipolar II (BP-II) disorders. In other words, the soft spectrum is more likely to declare itself in behavioral rather than mood disturbances. The obligatory search for elation and related mood changes a la DSM-IV (and its interview form, the SCID) during the clinical interview is often doomed to failure, thereby "condemning" the patient to a unipolar diagnosis, and hence to sequential and often tragic failures with antidepressants or combinations thereof. METHODS: To characterize behavioral signs of good specificity, though individually of low sensitivity for BP-II in patents presenting with major depression, the author undertook a chart review of over 1000 depressive patients he had examined extending over a period of nearly three decades. The Mood Clinic Data Questionnaire (MCDQ) used in the author's Memphis mood clinic permitted systematization of unstructured observations. BP-II had been independently confirmed by hypomania of > or =2 days and/or cyclothymia over the course of the index illness (both of which were validated by family history for bipolarity in earlier research in our clinic). RESULTS: Triads of behavior or traits in the patients' biographical history-as well as in the biologic kin-involving polyglottism, eminence, creative achievement, professional instability, multiple substance/alcohol use, multiple comorbidity (axis I and axis II), multiple marriages, a broad repertoire of sexual behavior (including brief interludes of homosexuality), impulse control disorders, as well as ornamentation and flamboyance (with red and other bright colors dominating) were specific for BP-II. Temperamentally, many of these individuals thrive on activity-they are indeed "activity junkies." LIMITATION: The reported findings pertain primarily to the differential diagnosis between BP-II and unipolar depression. Replication of the approach espoused herein will require quantification of the operational definitions of the observed phenomenology. CONCLUSION: The findings, which make sense in an evolutionary model of the advantage that "dilute" bipolar traits confer to human biography and erotic life, suggest that such behavioral traits can be useful provisionally in assigning a depressive episode to the realm of the bipolar II spectrum. Overall, the perspective espoused in this paper indicates that temperamental excesses and, more generally, a biographical approach, represent a more coherent approach than hypomanic episodes in the diagnosis of BP-II patients. Finally, such a diagnostic approach underscores the importance of incorporating evolutionary considerations and principles in understanding the origin of affective disorders.     

The distinct temperament profiles of bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar patients

BACKGROUND: Despite a plethora of studies, controversies abound on whether the long-term traits of unipolar and bipolar patients could be differentiated by temperament and whether these traits, in turn, could be distinguished from subthreshold affective symptomatology. METHODS: 98 bipolar I (BP-I), 64 bipolar II (BP-II), and 251 unipolar major depressive disorder (UP-MDD) patients all when recovered from discrete affective episodes) and 617 relatives, spouses or acquaintances without lifetime RDC diagnoses (the comparison group, CG) were administered a battery of 17 self-rated personality scales chosen for theoretical relevance to mood disorders. Subsamples of each of the four groups also received the General Behavior Inventory (GBI). RESULTS: Of the 436 personality items, 103 that significantly distinguished the three patient groups were subjected to principal components analysis, yielding four factors which reflect the temperamental dimensions of "Mood Lability", "Energy-Assertiveness," "Sensitivity-Brooding," and "Social Anxiety." Most BP-I described themselves as near normal in emotional stability and extroversion; BP-II emerged as labile in mood, energetic and assertive, yet sensitive and brooding; MDD were socially timid, sensitive and brooding. Gender and age did not have marked influence on these overall profiles. Within the MDD group, those with baseline dysthymia were the most pathological (i.e., high in neuroticism, insecurity and introversion). Selected GBI items measuring hypomania and biphasic mood changes were endorsed significantly more often by BP-II. Finally, it is relevant to highlight a methodologic finding about the precision these derived temperament factors brought to the UP-BP differentiation. Unlike BP-I who were low on neuroticism, both BP-II and UP scored high on this measure: yet, in the case of BP-II high neuroticism was largely due to mood lability, in UP it reflected subdepressive traits. LIMITATION: We used self-rated personality measures, a possible limitation generic to the paper-and-pencil personality literature. It is therefore likely that BP-I may have over-rated their "sanguinity"; or should one consider such self-report as a reliable reflection of one's temperament? One can raise similar unanswerable questions about "depressiveness" and "mood lability." CONCLUSION: As contrasted to CG and published norms, the postmorbid self-described "usual" personality is 1) sanguine among many, but not all, BP-I; 2) labile or cyclothymic among BP-II; and 3) subanxious and subdepressive among UP. It is further noteworthy that with the exception of BP-II, the temperament scores of BP-I and MDD were within one SD from published norms. Rather than being pathological, these attributes are best conceived as subclinical temperamental variants of the normal, thereby supporting the notion of continuity between interepisodic and episodic phases of affective disorders. These findings overall are in line with Kraepelin's views and contrary to the DSM-IV formulation of axis-II constructs as being pathological and sharply demarcated from affective episodes.     

Irritable-hostile depression: further validation as a bipolar depressive mixed state

BACKGROUND: "Hostile depression" has unofficially long been described as a depressive subtype, but since DSM-III, the affect has been made a defining characteristic of borderline personality disorder. The related affect of irritability in DSM-IV-TR subsumes various hostile nuances and is included in the stem question for mood disorders--especially for hypomanic episodes; in children, it is nonetheless a sign of depression. Then, there is the unofficial more general concept of depression with anger attacks, until recently ostensibly a "unipolar" (UP) disorder. A veritable tower of Babel indeed. In the present analyses, our aim was to extend previous research on irritable-hostile depression to more specific parameters of bipolarity and depressive mixed state (DMX). METHODS: Consecutive 348 bipolar-II (BP-II) and 254 unipolar (UP) major depressive disorder (MDD) outpatients (off psychoactive agents, including substances of abuse), were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Hypomania Interview Guide, and the Family History Screen. Borderline personality, a confounding variable, rare in the FB setting, was excluded. Irritability was defined according to DSM-IV-TR, which includes various features of hostility and anger. Depressive mixed state (DMX) was defined as a major depressive episode (MDE) plus three or more concurrent intradepressive hypomanic symptoms, whether it occurred in BP-II or MDD. RESULTS: MDE with irritability was present in 59.7% (208/348) of BP-II and in 37.4% (95/254) of MDD (p=0.0000). In BP-II, MDE with, versus MDE without, irritability had significantly younger index age, higher rates of axis I comorbidity, atypical depressive features, and DMX. Upon logistic regression, we found a significant independent association between BP-II MDE with irritability and DMX. In UP, MDE with, versus without, irritability had significantly younger age and age at onset, higher rates of atypical depression, DMX, and bipolar family history. Logistic regression revealed a significant independent association between MDE with irritability and DMX. Given that we had excluded patients with borderline personality, the high prevalence of irritable-hostile depressives in this outpatient population means that hostility cannot be considered the signature of that personality. Factor analysis revealed independent "psychomotor activation" and "irritability-mental activation" factors. Odds ratios of irritability for DMX were highest in the "UP" MDD group (=12.2); for predicting DMX, irritability had the best psychometric profile of sensitivity of 66.3% and a specificity of 86.1% for this group as well. LIMITATION: We did not use specific instruments to measure irritable, hostile, and angry affects. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses show that irritable-hostile depression is distinct from agitated depression. Whether arising from a BP-II or MDD baseline, irritable-hostile depression emerges as a valid entity with strong links to external bipolar validators, such as bipolar family history. Irritable-hostile phenomenology in depression appears to be a strong clinical marker for a DMX. Irritable-hostile depression as a variant of DMX deserves the benefit of what seems to work best in practice, i.e., anticonvulsant mood stabilizers and/or atypical antipsychotics. Formal treatment studies are very much needed.     

Effects of postmenopausal hypoestrogenism on skin collagen

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of aging and postmenopausal hypoestrogenism on skin collagen content. Methods: Thirty-two women (mean age 48.78±9.86; year±S.D., range 28–68), 14 in premenopause and 18 in postmenopause, underwent skin biopsies performed during laparotomic operation. The amount of collagen type I, III and type III/type I ratio was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and computerised image analysis, and was related to age and years of postmenopause. Results: In the postmenopausal patients, a significant (P<0.01) decrease of percentage of skin collagen type I, type III and type III/type I ratio was observed in comparison to premenopausal women. The percentages of collagen type I, type III and type III/I ratio of all patients studied was significantly (P<0.01) correlated with chronological age (r=0.88, 0.89 and 0.61, respectively). Considering only postmenopausal subjects, the correlation with chronological age was significant (P<0.01) for collagen type I and type III of postmenopausal women (r=0.59, r=0.64, respectively), but not for the type III/I ratio (r=0.37, P=0.131). The percentages of collagen type I, type III and type III/I ratio of postmenopausal women showed a significant (P<0.01) inverse correlation with years of postmenopause (r=0.76, 0.73 and 0.73, respectively). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the decrease of skin collagen is an estrogen-related phenomenon.