Antibiotic prescribing for the future: exploring the attitudes of trainees in general practice

Background

Antibiotic resistance is a public health concern worldwide. A high proportion of antibiotics are prescribed in primary care, often for conditions where there is no evidence of benefit. Without a change in these prescribing patterns, resistance will persist as a significant problem in the future. Little is known about how trainees in general practice perceive and develop their prescribing.

Aim

To explore the attitudes of trainees in general practice towards antibiotic use and resistance, and the perceived influences on their prescribing.

Design and setting

A qualitative study of 17 vocational trainees in general practice (GP registrars) in both rural and urban areas in Australia employing semi-structured interviews and a focus group.

Method

Maximum variation purposive sampling of GP registrars from diverse backgrounds and training stages continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Topics of discussion included awareness of antibiotic resistance, use of evidence-based guidelines, and perceived influences on prescribing. Transcribed interviews were coded independently by two researchers. Data collection and analysis were concurrent and cumulative, using a process of iterative thematic analysis.

Results

Registrars were aware of the importance of evidence-based antibiotic prescribing and the impact of their decisions on resistance. Many expressed a sense of dissonance between their knowledge and behaviours. Contextual influences on their decisions included patient and system factors, diagnostic uncertainty, transitioning from hospital medicine, and the habits of, and relationship with, their supervisor.

Conclusion

Understanding how trainees in general practice perceive and develop antibiotic prescribing habits will enable targeted educational interventions to be designed and implemented at a crucial stage in training, working towards ensuring appropriate antibiotic prescribing in the future.     

Depth of the patient–doctor relationship and content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study

Background

Patient–doctor continuity is valued by both parties, yet the effect of the depth of the patient–doctor relationship on the content of consultations in general practice is unknown.

Aim

To assess whether differences in the depth of relationship between a patient and their GP affects the length of consultations, and the number and type of problems and issues raised during a consultation.

Design and setting

Cross-sectional study in 22 GP practices in the UK.

Method

GP consultations (n = 229) were videotaped and the number of problems and aspects of those problems and issues identified. Patients completed the Patient–Doctor Depth of Relationship (PDDR) and General Practice Assessment Questionnaire-communication (GPAQc) scales. Associations were explored using multivariable linear and logistic regression.

Results

Complete data were available on 190 participants consulting 30 GPs. In unadjusted analysis, patients with a deep relationship with their GP discussed more problems (mean 2.8) and issues (mean 4.7) compared with those with a moderate (2.4 problems; 4.0 issues) or shallow (2.3 problems; 3.8 issues) relationship. Patients with deep relationships had consultations that were on average 118 seconds (95% CI = 1 to 236) longer than those with shallow relationships. Adjustment for participant and GP factors attenuated these relationships, although the main trends persisted.

Conclusion

A greater number of problems and issues may be raised in a consultation when patients have a deeper relationship with their GP. Over several clinical encounters each year, this may be associated with significant benefits to patients and efficiencies in GP consultations and warrants further investigation.     

Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for patients presenting in primary care

Background

Musculoskeletal problems generate high costs. Of these disorders, patients with knee problems are commonly seen by GPs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee is an accurate diagnostic test, but there is uncertainty as to whether GP access to MRI for these patients is a cost-effective policy.

Aim

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of GP referral to early MRI and a provisional orthopaedic appointment, compared with referral to an orthopaedic specialist without prior MRI for patients with continuing knee problems.

Design of study

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic randomised trial.

Setting

Five-hundred and thirty-three patients consulting their GP about a knee problem were recruited from 163 general practices at 11 sites across the UK.

Method

Two-year costs were estimated from the NHS perspective. Health outcomes were expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), based on patient responses to the EQ–5D questionnaire administered at baseline, and at 6, 12, and 24 months’ follow-up.

Results

Early MRI is associated with a higher NHS cost, by £294 ($581; €435) per patient (95% confidence interval [CI] = £31 to £573), and a larger number of QALYs, by 0.050 (95% CI = −0.025 to 0.118). Mean differences in cost and QALYs generated an incremental cost per QALY gained of £5840 ($11 538; €8642). At a cost per QALY threshold of £20 000, there is a 0.81 probability that early MRI is a cost-effective use of NHS resources.

Conclusion

GP access to MRI for patients presenting in primary care with a continuing knee problem represents a cost-effective use of health service resources.     

Primary care access and its relationship with emergency department utilisation: an observational, cross-sectional, ecological study

Background

Recent health service policies in the UK have focused on improving primary care access in order to reduce the use of costly emergency department services, even though the relationship between the two is based on weak or little evidence. Research is required to establish whether improving primary care access can influence emergency department attendance.

Aim

To ascertain whether a relationship exists between the degree of access to GP practices and avoidable emergency department attendances in an inner-London primary care trust (PCT).

Design and setting

Observational, cross-sectional ecological study in 68 general practices in Brent Primary Care Trust, north London, UK.

Method

GP practices were used as the unit of analysis and avoidable emergency department attendance as the dependent variable. Routinely collected data from GP practices, Hospital Episode Statistics, and census data for the period covering 2007–2009 were used across three broad domains: GP access characteristics, population characteristics, and health status aggregated to the level of the GP practice. Multiple linear regression was used to ascertain which variables account for the variation in emergency department attendance experienced by patients registered to each GP practice.

Results

None of the GP access variables accounted for the variation in emergency department attendance. The only variable that explained this variance was the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). For every unit increase in IMD score of the GP practice, there would be an increase of 6.13 (95% CI = 4.56, 7.70) per 1000 patients per year in emergency department attendances. This accounted for 47.9% of the variance in emergency department attendances in Brent.

Conclusion

Avoidable emergency department attendance appears to be mostly driven by underlying deprivation rather than by the degree of access to primary care.     

Are patients with dementia treated as well as patients without dementia for hypertension,diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia?

Background

Patients suffering from dementia are at risk of being treated differently by GPs from patients without it. Explanations for this could be stigmatisation, treatment with a palliative approach, and the result of the disease process.

Aim

To ascertain whether patients with dementia are treated differently, the index diseases of hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidaemia were used to measure care.

Design of study

Retrospective matched control study.

Setting

German general practice.

Method

Sixteen GP practices recruited all their patients with dementia and at least one of the index diseases. Patients without dementia but only the index diseases were matched for age, sex, index disease, and practice, resulting in 216 pairs of patients with and without dementia. From the files, blood pressure, blood sugar/glycated haemoglobin, cholesterol, the dates of measurement, the number of doctor–patient contacts, and the prescribed medication to treat the three conditions under scrutiny were documented. For analysis, t-tests and χ²-tests were used.

Results

No differences were found in treatment outcomes between the two patients groups, except one significant difference: one of the two documented systolic blood pressure values is lower in the dementia group. Furthermore, patients with dementia more often do not receive any medication or are treated with low-priced medications for hypertension (nearly significant).

Conclusion

GPs do not seem to treat patients with dementia differently. The use of lower-priced antihypertensive medication could be the only indication for some kind of difference in approach.     

Accessing primary care: a simulated patient study

Background

Simulated patient, or so-called ‘mystery-shopper’, studies are a controversial, but potentially useful, approach to take when conducting health services research.

Aim

To investigate the construct validity of survey questions relating to access to primary care included in the English GP Patient Survey.

Design and setting

Observational study in 41 general practices in rural, urban, and inner-city settings in the UK.

Method

Between May 2010 and March 2011, researchers telephoned practices at monthly intervals, simulating patients requesting routine, but prompt, appointments. Seven measures of access and appointment availability, measured from the mystery-shopper contacts, were related to seven measures of practice performance from the GP Patient Survey.

Results

Practices with lower access scores in the GP Patient Survey had poorer access and appointment availability for five out of seven items measured directly, when compared with practices that had higher scores. Scores on items from the national survey that related to appointment availability were significantly associated with direct measures of appointment availability. Patient-satisfaction levels and the likelihood that patients would recommend their practice were related to the availability of appointments. Patients’ reports of ease of telephone access in the national survey were unrelated to three out of four measures of practice call handling, but were related to the time taken to resolve an appointment request, suggesting responders’ possible confusion in answering this question.

Conclusion

Items relating to the accessibility of care in a the English GP patient survey have construct validity. Patients’ satisfaction with their practice is not related to practice call handling, but is related to appointment availability.     

Do English patients want continuity of care,and do they receive it?

Background

Interpersonal continuity of care is valued by patients, but there is concern that it has declined in recent years.

Aim

To determine how often patients express preference for seeing a particular GP and the extent to which that preference is met.

Design of study

Analysis of data from the 2009/2010 English GP Patient Survey.

Setting

A stratified random sample of adult patients registered with 8362 general practices in England (response rate 39%, yielding 2?169?718 responses).

Method

Weighted estimates were calculated of preference for and success in seeing a particular GP. Multilevel logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with these two outcomes.

Results

Excluding practices with one GP, 62% of patients expressed a preference for seeing a particular GP. Of these patients, 72% were successful in seeing their preferred GP most of the time. Certain patient groups were associated with more preference for and success in seeing a particular GP. These were older patients (preference odds ratio [OR]?=?1.7, success OR?=?1.8), those with chronic medical conditions (preference OR?=?1.9, success OR?=?1.3), those with chronic psychological conditions (preference OR?=?1.6, success OR?=?1.3), and those recently requesting only non-urgent versus urgent appointments (preference OR?=?1.4, success OR?=?1.6). Patient groups that had more frequent preference but less success in seeing a preferred GP were females (preference OR?=?1.5, success OR?=?0.9), patients in larger practices (preference OR?=?1.3, success OR?=?0.5), and those belonging to non-white ethnic groups.

Conclusion

The majority of patients value interpersonal continuity, yet a large minority of patients and specific patient groups are not regularly able to see the GP they prefer.     

GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death

Background

Being able to die in one''s place of choice is an indicator of the quality of end-of-life care. GPs may play a key role in exploring and honouring patients'' preferences for place of death.

Aim

To examine how often GPs are informed about patients'' preferred place of death, by whom and for which patients, and to study the expressed preferred place of death and how often patients die at their preferred place.

Design of study

One-year nationwide mortality retrospective study.

Setting

Sentinel Network of GPs in Belgium, 2006.

Method

GPs'' weekly registration of all deaths (patients aged ≥1 year).

Results

A total of 798 non-sudden deaths were reported. GPs were informed of patients'' preferred place of death in 46% of cases. GPs obtained this information directly from patients in 63%. GP awareness was positively associated with patients not being hospitalised in the last 3 months of life (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8 to 5.6), involvement of informal caregivers (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.8 to 6.1), use of a multidisciplinary palliative care team (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.5), and with presence of more than seven contacts between GP and patient or family in the last 3 months of life (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 2.2 to 4.3). In instances where GPs were informed, more than half of patients (58%) preferred to die at home. Overall, 80% of patients died at their preferred place.

Conclusion

GPs are often unaware of their patients'' preference for place of death. However, if GPs are informed, patients often die at their preferred location. Several healthcare characteristics might contribute to this and to a higher level of GP awareness.     

Motivation and satisfaction in GP training: a UK cross-sectional survey

Background

Recruitment to general practice has had periods of difficulty, but is currently going through a phase of relative popularity in the UK.

Aim

To explore motivators for career choice and career satisfaction among UK GP trainees and newly qualified GPs.

Design and setting

Cross-sectional web-based questionnaire of GP trainees and GPs within the first 5 years of qualification in the UK.

Method

All 9557 UK GP trainees and 8013 GPs who were within the first 5 years of qualification were invited to participate by email. Further publicity was conducted via general practice publications and the internet.

Results

Overall, there were 2178 responses to the questionnaire (12.4% response rate, 61.5% women, 61.8% trainees). Levels of satisfaction were high, with 83% of responders stating that they would choose to be a doctor again; of these, 95% would choose to be a GP again. The most frequently cited reason for choosing general practice was ‘compatibility with family life’, which was chosen by 76.6% of women and 63.2% of men (P<0.001). Other reasons given were: ‘challenging medically diverse discipline’ (women 59.8%, men 61.8%, P = 0.350), ‘the one-to-one care general practice offers’ (women 40.0%, men 41.2%, P = 0.570), ‘holistic approach’ (women 41.4%, men 30.1%, P<0.001), ‘autonomy and independence’ (women 18.0%, men 34.8%, P<0.001), ‘communication’ (women 20.6%, men 12.2%, P<0.001), ‘negative experiences in hospital’ (women 12.8%, men 9.8%, P= 0.036), and ‘good salary’ (women 7.8%, men 14.9%, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The most important reason for both women and men choosing general practice as a career in the UK is its compatibility with family life. As such, changes to UK primary care that decrease family compatibility could negatively impact on recruitment.     

Recognising patients who will die in the near future: a nationwide study via the Dutch Sentinel Network of GPs

Background

Recognising patients who will die in the near future is important for adequate planning and provision of end-of-life care. GPs can play a key role in this.

Aim

To explore the following questions: How long before death do GPs recognise patients likely to die in the near future? Which patient, illness, and care-related characteristics are related to such recognition? How does recognising death in the near future, before the last week of life, relate to care in during this period?

Design and setting

One-year follow-back study via a surveillance GP network in the Netherlands.

Method

Registration of demographic and care-related characteristics.

Results

Of 252 non-sudden deaths, 70% occurred in the home or care home and 30% in hospital. GP recognition of death in the near future was absent in 30%, and occurred prior to the last month in 15%, within the last month in 19%, and in the last week in 34%. Logistic regression analyses showed cancer and low functional status were positively associated with death in the near future; cancer and discussing palliative care options were positively associated with recognising death in the near future before the last week of life. Recognising death in the near future before patients’ last week of life was associated with fewer hospital deaths, more GP–patient contacts in the last week, more deaths in a preferred place, and more-frequent GP–patient discussions about specific topics in the last 7 days of life.

Conclusion

Recognising death in the near future precedes several aspects of end-of-life care. The proportion in whom death in the near future is never recognised is large, suggesting GPs could be assisted in this process through training and implementation of care protocols that promote timely recognition of the dying phase.     

Employment loss during economic crisis and suicidal thoughts in Belgium: a survey in general practice

Background

The economic crisis of 2009 led to a wave of corporate reorganisations and bankruptcies, with many dismissals of employees. GPs were confronted with subsequent health consequences.

Aim

To assess the possible relationship between losing one’s job and having suicidal thoughts.

Design and setting

A survey of patients aged 18–49 years recruited from GP practices in Belgium in Deurne (Flemish region) and La Louvière (Walloon region) from September to December 2010.

Method

Anonymous self-administered questionnaire.

Results

Of all eligible patients (n = 1818), 831 were offered the questionnaire and 377 completed it (45.4%). More than one in five had been confronted with employment loss in the past year (the responder or someone close losing their job). Almost one in ten had lost their job themselves in the past year. More than one in four had experienced suicidal thoughts and 11.7% had seriously considered ending their life in the past year. In the logistic regression analysis, the following characteristics showed a statistically significant relationship with having suicidal thoughts: being single (odds ratio [OR] = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 13.8), not having satisfying social contacts (OR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.6 to 16.2), having depressive complaints (OR = 18.4, 95% CI = 5.8 to 58.4), and having lost one’s employment in the past year (OR = 8.8, 95% CI = 2.0 to 39.3).

Conclusion

This study points to a statistically significant relationship between losing one’s employment in the past year and having suicidal thoughts. It emphasises the important role of the GP in the continuous and reinforced assessment of suicidal risk in times of recession.     

The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: evidence from three longitudinal studies

Background

The selection methodology for UK general practice is designed to accommodate several thousand applicants per year and targets six core attributes identified in a multi-method job-analysis study

Aim

To evaluate the predictive validity of selection methods for entry into postgraduate training, comprising a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre.

Design and setting

A three-part longitudinal predictive validity study of selection into training for UK general practice.

Method

In sample 1, participants were junior doctors applying for training in general practice (n = 6824). In sample 2, participants were GP registrars 1 year into training (n = 196). In sample 3, participants were GP registrars sitting the licensing examination after 3 years, at the end of training (n = 2292). The outcome measures include: assessor ratings of performance in a selection centre comprising job simulation exercises (sample 1); supervisor ratings of trainee job performance 1 year into training (sample 2); and licensing examination results, including an applied knowledge examination and a 12-station clinical skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE; sample 3).

Results

Performance ratings at selection predicted subsequent supervisor ratings of job performance 1 year later. Selection results also significantly predicted performance on both the clinical skills OSCE and applied knowledge examination for licensing at the end of training.

Conclusion

In combination, these longitudinal findings provide good evidence of the predictive validity of the selection methods, and are the first reported for entry into postgraduate training. Results show that the best predictor of work performance and training outcomes is a combination of a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre. Implications for selection methods for all postgraduate specialties are considered.     

Effectiveness of GPs in accident and emergency departments

Background

Many self-attending patients make inappropriate use of accident and emergency departments.

Aim

To determine whether a new care method consisting of the involvement of a GP during the day with the staff of the accident and emergency department of an academic city hospital and application of the Nederlands Triage Systeem by a practice nurse is more effective than usual care.

Design

Before and after intervention design.

Setting

Accident and emergency department in the VU University Medical Center in Amsterdam.

Method

Participants were patients (n = 1527) attending the accident and emergency department without a referral, on weekdays from 10.00–17.00 hours, from 1 November 2006 to 30 April 2007. The intervention consisted of a new care method that combined the involvement of a GP in the accident and emergency department and allocation of patients by triage to either the GP or the accident and emergency department physician. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction, number and type of additional examinations, quality of diagnosis, process time, and treatment time.

Results

Patient satisfaction with the treatment increased significantly. Compared to the usual care method, this new care method resulted in a 13% decrease in additional examinations. The percentage of incorrect diagnoses (1 %), as a measure of quality of care, was similar with the two methods. The mean process time decreased from 93 to 69 minutes (P<0.001). The mean treatment time decreased from 60 to 35 minutes (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The new care method resulted in greater patient satisfaction and maintained the quality of care, with fewer additional examinations. It reduced both the process time and the treatment time.     

Long-term patterns of online evidence retrieval use in general practice: a 12-month study

Background

Provision of online evidence at the point of care is one strategy that could provide clinicians with easy access to up-to-date evidence in clinical settings in order to support evidence-based decision making.

Objective

The aim was to determine long-term use of an online evidence system in routine clinical practice.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. 59 clinicians who had a computer with Internet access in their consulting room participated in a 12-month trial of Quick Clinical, an online evidence system specifically designed around the needs of general practitioners (GPs). Patterns of use were determined by examination of computer logs and survey analysis.

Results

On average, 9.9 searches were conducted by each GP in the first 2 months of the study. After this, usage dropped to 4.4 searches per GP in the third month and then levelled off to between 0.4 and 2.6 searches per GP per month. The majority of searches (79.2%, 2013/2543) were conducted during practice hours (between 9 am and 5 pm) and on weekdays (90.7%, 2315/2543). The most frequent searches related to diagnosis (33.6%, 821/2291) and treatment (34.5%, 844/2291).

Conclusion

GPs will use an online evidence retrieval system in routine practice; however, usage rates drop significantly after initial introduction of the system. Long-term studies are required to determine the extent to which GPs will integrate the use of such technologies into their everyday clinical practice and how this will affect the satisfaction and health outcomes of their patients.     

Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Background

GPs investigate approximately half of all infertile couples with semen analysis and endocrine blood tests. For assessment of tubal status, hysterosalpingography (HSG) is recommended as a first-line investigation for women not known to have comorbidities.

Aim

To test whether providing GPs with open access to HSG results in infertile couples progressing to a diagnosis and management plan sooner than with usual management.

Design of study

A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Setting

Seventy-one of 173 general practices in north-east England agreed to participate.

Method

A total of 670 infertile couples presented to 33 intervention practices and 25 control practices over a 2-year period. Practices allocated to the intervention group had access to HSG for those infertile women who fulfilled predefined eligibility criteria. The primary outcome measure was the interval between presentation to the GP and the couple receiving a diagnosis and management plan.

Results

An annual incidence of 0.8 couples per 1000 total population equated to each GP seeing an average of one or two infertile couples each year. Open access HSG was used for 9% of all infertile women who presented to the intervention practices during the study period. The time to reach a diagnosis and management plan for all infertile couples presenting was not affected by the availability of open access HSG (Cox regression hazard ratio = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7 to 1.1). For couples who reached a diagnosis and management plan, there was a non-significant difference in time to primary outcome for intervention versus control practices (32.5 weeks versus 30.5 weeks, mean difference 2.2 weeks, 95% CI = 1.6 to 6.1 weeks, P = 0.1). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.03 across all practices.

Conclusion

Providing GPs with open access to HSG had no effect on the time taken to reach a diagnosis and management plan for couples with infertility.