Children with asthma and their caregivers help improve written asthma action plans: A pilot mixed-method study

Objective: The objectives of this study were to (a) qualitatively examine caregiver and child feedback about a gold standard written asthma action plan (WAAP), and (b) determine whether having an asthma action plan was associated with child and caregiver self-efficacy in managing an exacerbation. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of structured interviews with 22 children with persistent asthma that collected feedback about the WAAP as well as self-efficacy. An analysis of interviews used the constant comparative method to identify themes of child and caregiver statements. Caregivers completed a questionnaire that measured asthma management self-efficacy, barriers to managing asthma, and belief in the treatment efficacy using validated scales. Results: Approximately 36% of the caregivers reported having a WAAP for their child from their child's pediatrician. Most caregivers stated that having pictures would improve the WAAP, while most children stated that the layout needed to be improved by adding more space between the sections. Caregivers who reported knowing what the asthma action plan was had greater self-efficacy than caregivers who did not (z = ?1.99, p = 0.047). Conclusions: Re-designing the current WAAP layout and including pictures of inhalers may promote patient understanding. Future research needs to examine if a re-designed WAAP improves asthma management of children with asthma and their caregivers.     

Factors associated with ownership and use of written asthma action plans in North-West Melbourne.

PURPOSE: Written asthma action plans (WAAPs) have become a core component of asthma management in Australia. We investigated ownership, utilisation and factors associated with ownership of asthma action plans by caregivers. METHODS: 443/776 (57%) caregivers of children aged 2-14 years with asthma were identified from 32 GP clinics as part of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), and completed self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Only 29% of participants owned a WAAP, while 13% possessed verbal instructions, and 56% had no plan. An asthma action plan for children, which was developed by a general practitioner (GP) was more likely to comprise verbal instructions (p = 0.001), while action plans developed by paediatricians were more likely to be written (p < 0.001). Just over one half of caregivers (59%) reported discussing their child's action plan the last time they visited their doctor for asthma. Factors associated with WAAP ownership included nights waking (p = 0.013), self reported severity (p = 0.001), and days lost from school (p = 0.037). Children who had seen a GP in the last 3 months for asthma, or who had been to the Emergency Department (ED) or hospital were more likely to possess a WAAP (p < 0.001). Caregivers who were less satisfied with their child's asthma control were more likely to own a WAAP (p = 0.037). Caregivers with any action plan found it useful and 82% reported using their action plan for management of an acute attack. However, caregivers with a WAAP were more likely to adhere to the plan for an acute attack compared to caregivers with verbal instructions (OR = 4.5, p < 0.05). Caregivers with a WAAP were more knowledgeable about asthma (p = 0.002), better able to recognise the difference between preventer and reliever medications (p = 0.01), and better able to recognise an asthma attack (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Ownership of WAAPs in this group was still too low. Importantly, caregivers with written instructions were more knowledgeable about asthma and more likely to report following the action plan during an asthma attack.     

Smokers who have children with asthma: Perceptions about child secondhand smoke exposure and tobacco use initiation and parental willingness to participate in child-focused tobacco interventions

Objective: This study examined, among parents who smoke and have children with asthma, perceptions about child secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), child tobacco use (TU) initiation, and parent willingness to participate in child-focused tobacco interventions. Methods: Participants were 300 caregivers who smoked and had a child with asthma (aged 10–14). Parents completed an online survey and self-reported perceptions about child SHSe elimination, child TU prevention, and willingness to participate in three types of interventions with and without their child (SHSe reduction intervention, tobacco prevention intervention, and the combination of the two). Correlates of perceptions and willingness were examined. Results: Parents who were ready to quit smoking and who reported home smoking bans (HSBs) were more motivated to eliminate SHSe (p < 0.05). Being white, younger, ready to quit, and having HSBs were associated with greater confidence to eliminate SHSe (p < 0.05). Parents with HSBs reported higher perceived importance about preventing child TU (p < 0.05). Parents were less confident about preventing male children from using tobacco (p = 0.001). Parents were highly willing to participate in all the described intervention approaches, with or without their child. Conclusions: Parents were willing to participate in child-focused tobacco interventions, with or without their child with asthma, including interventions that address both child SHSe and TU prevention. This research demonstrates the acceptability of child-focused tobacco interventions among a high-risk population and may be a foundational step for intervention development.     

Children's and Parents' Report of Asthma Education Received from Physicians

Objective. Clinical practice guidelines recommend that physicians provide asthma education to patients and their families. To characterize parents’ and children’s perception of physician practice, we examined: (i) proportion of parents and children reporting physician discussion of asthma education topics; (ii) age-group differences in children’s report; (iii) site differences in children’s and parents’ report; (iv) sociodemographic and disease characteristics associated with children’s report; and (v) the relation between children’s report and adherence to daily controller medications. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 125 children with asthma (mean age = 11.3 years; 62% were male) and their parents. Parents provided demographic and disease data. Children reported whether physicians had ever discussed each of 16 asthma education topics with them. We used logistic regression to examine age-group and site differences in children’s report of physician discussion of each topic. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine associations between demographic (e.g., child age, race) and disease (e.g., symptom severity) variables and topics discussed. Results. On average, 34.7% of children reported physician discussion of a topic; 8–10-year-olds reported significantly fewer topics discussed than children aged 11 and older (p < .05). Whereas parents’ report differed by practice setting, children’s report did not. In multivariate analyses, child age (β = 0.46 (SE: 0.17); p < .01), persistent symptoms (β = 1.59 (SE: 0.80); p < .05), and number of outpatient asthma visits (β = 0.19 (SE: 0.08); p < .05) remained significantly associated with number of topics discussed. Conclusion. These results suggest that the majority of children either may not receive, or may not recall receiving, information from their physicians about the fundamentals of asthma management. Physicians have an invaluable teaching opportunity in the medical office visit and should consider capitalizing on this opportunity to build children’s sense of self-efficacy and competence in their self-care.     

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument for the Emergency Department (PACCI-ED) improves physician assessment of asthma morbidity in pediatric emergency department patients

Objectives: To determine whether the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument for the Emergency Department (PACCI-ED), a 12-item questionnaire, can help ED attendings accurately assess a patient’s asthma control and morbidity. Methods: This was a randomized-controlled trial performed at an urban pediatric ED of children aged 1–17 years presenting with an asthma exacerbation. Parents answered PACCI-ED questions about their children’s asthma. Attendings were randomized to view responses to the PACCI-ED (intervention group) or to be blinded to the completed PACCI-ED (control group). The two groups were compared on their empirical clinical assessment of: (1) chronic asthma control categories, (2) asthma trajectory (stable, worsening or improving), (3) patient adherence to controller medications, and (4) burden of disease for the patient’s family. The validated PACCI algorithm was used as the criterion standard for these four outcomes. Accuracy of clinical assessment was compared between intervention and control groups using chi-squared tests and an intention-to-treat approach. Results: Seventeen ED attendings were enrolled in the study and 77 children visits were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between the intervention and the control groups for child’s gender, age, race, and asthma characteristics. Intervention group attendings were more accurate than control group attendings in assessing the category of chronic asthma control (43% versus 19%; p?=?0.03), disease trajectory (72% versus 45%; p?=?0.02), and the disease burden for families (74% versus 35%; p?=?0.001) over the past 12 months. There was a trend towards more accuracy of intervention versus control attendings for estimating patient adherence to controller medications (72% versus 48%; p?=?0.06). Conclusions: The PACCI-ED improves the assessment of asthma control, trajectory, and burden by ED attendings, and may help assessment of asthma medication adherence and prior asthma exacerbations. The PACCI-ED can be used to improve provider assessment of asthma morbidity during pediatric ED visits for asthma exacerbations, and to identify children who may benefit from interventions to reduce asthma morbidity.     

The Potential Biases in Studying the Relationship between Asthma and Microbial Infection

Objective. To assess bias in parent reports of asthma status of children and detection bias of medical records-based asthma ascertainment and to examine effects of such bias on the association between asthma status and infections.Methods. A prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the correlations between the frequency of acute illnesses and that of medical evaluations between children with or without asthma according to parental report and medical record review by following a group of children who were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Sick Child Care Program in Rochester, Minnesota. Parents completed a self-administered questionnaire to determine asthma status of their child. Also, comprehensive medical record reviews were conducted to determine asthma status of each subject by applying predetermined criteria for asthma.Results. A convenience sample of 115 parents and their children participated in this study. The mean age of the parents who participated in the study was 32.8 years (standard deviation: 5.4 years); 93% were female (mothers); and 90% were white. Of the 115 children who participated in this study, 84% were reported to be white and 49% were female. The mean age of the children was 2 years (standard deviation: 1.0 year). Parents whose children had asthma by report appeared to be less likely to seek medical evaluations (Spearman's rho: 0.42,p = 0.11) when their children had acute illnesses, compared to those of non-asthmatic children (rho: 0.64,p < 0.001). Concerns that asthmatic patients (rho: 0.62,p < 0.001) are more likely to see health care providers and undergo medical evaluations and laboratory tests when they have acute illnesses than non-asthmatic patients (rho: 0.64,p < 0.001) are not supported by our study.Conclusion. Parental report bias needs to be considered carefully when studying the relationship between asthma and microbial infection.     

Predictors of Primary Care Follow-Up After a Pediatric Emergency Visit for Asthma

Objective. Prior studies have reported low rates of follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP) after emergency department (ED) treatment for asthma. We sought to identify predictors associated with PCP follow-up. Methods. As part of a randomized trial we surveyed parents of children aged 2–18 years being discharged after ED asthma treatment. Parents described their child's asthma history and perceived benefits and barriers to making a PCP follow-up visit. Bivariate tests and multivariable logistic regression were used to determine association with completion of a follow-up visit within 4 weeks of the ED visit. Results. A total of 278 subjects (N = 278)were enrolled; 55% saw their PCP within 4 weeks of the ED visit. Baseline factors that were associated with an increased likelihood of follow-up included a recent hospitalization, more than one ED visit for asthma in the past year, the parent's assessment that the child has “very severe” asthma, and current daily use of a controller medication. Parental beliefs that taking daily asthma medications and finding out about the causes of asthma attacks were very important and were also associated with increased PCP follow-up. Parents were less likely to follow up if they reported a lack of convenient appointments or prolonged waits in the PCP office. A multivariable model including clinical factors, parental beliefs, and the study intervention predicted the likelihood of follow-up. Conclusions. Parental beliefs about asthma severity, the benefits of controlling asthma, and organizational barriers to seeing a PCP were associated with follow-up after a pediatric ED visit for asthma.     

Findings from a community-based asthma education fair for Latino caregivers

Abstract

Objective: To assess limited English proficiency (LEP) asthma caregiver quality of life (QoL), skills retention and healthcare utilization after an asthma education fair (AEF). Methods: A language concordant AEF was conducted at a Latino community center. LEP caregivers of children 1–12 years old and an established asthma diagnosis participated in three skill stations: (a) medication recognition and administration, (b) peak flow use (if child?≥?5 years) and (c) action plan dissemination. Spacers, peak flow meters and individualized action plans were distributed. A validated, pediatric asthma caregiver quality of life questionnaire (PACQLQ-Spanish version) was administered. Baseline data was compared to follow-up interview data at three and six months after the AEF. Mean PACQLQ scores were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and nominal paired data with McNemar’s test. Results: We analyzed data from 18 caregivers able to speak English well (22%), not well (28%) or not at all (50%). After three months, improved caregiver QoL was experienced (51 vs. 72, p?<?0.01). No differences were observed in medication recognition, spacer and peak flow use or peak flow interpretation. After six months, mean school days missed due to asthma decreased (4.1 vs. 0.4, p?<?0.01). Mean clinic visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations remained unchanged. Conclusions: Implementation of a community-based AEF with action plan administration can be beneficial for LEP caregivers and their children. QoL improvements to emotional wellbeing and activity limitations were observed, and lower rates of school absenteeism were reported. Caregiver ability to accurately identify medications was not enhanced.     

Caregiver knowledge and its relationship to asthma control among children in Saudi Arabia

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine caregiver responses to individual questions of the asthma knowledge questionnaire and to compare the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma among children according to caregiver responses (correct vs. incorrect). Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study among 158 children with asthma aged 4–11 who were attending the pediatric primary care clinic of the King Khalid University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The asthma knowledge questionnaire for use with parents or guardians of children with asthma was used to measure the knowledge of caregivers. Asthma control in the children was measured using an Arabic version of the childhood asthma control test. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma according to the caregivers’ responses. Results: This study showed substantial gaps in knowledge among caregivers of children with asthma. The answer to only one of 17 questions was well known (86.1%); this question involved the harm of smoking near a child with asthma. Answers on 11 of 17 questions were significantly (p?Conclusions: Although innovations are needed to help patients improve their adherence to treatment and to effectively utilize the benefits of contemporary asthma medications, we observe substantial knowledge-related problems in the asthma management of children in Saudi Arabia.     

Concordance among children,caregivers, and clinicians on barriers to controller medication use

Objective: While much research has addressed asthma medication adherence, few have combined quantitative and qualitative data, and none has addressed the triad of child, caregiver, and clinician simultaneously. This study assessed, with mixed methods, barriers to medication adherence within this triad. Methods: We conducted interviews with publicly-insured children with asthma, their caregivers, and their primary-care clinicians. Children (7–17 years) had been prescribed daily inhaled corticosteroids and visited the ED for asthma (past year). Participants answered open-ended and survey questions, rating suggested barriers to medication use (never vs. ever a barrier). McNemar's tests compared report of barriers by each group (children, caregivers, clinicians), and assessed concordance within triads. Results: Fifty child–caregiver dyads participated (34 clinicians). Children (40% female; median age 10 years) had mostly non-Hispanic black (90%) caregivers with less than or equal to high-school education (68%). For barriers, children and clinicians were more likely than caregivers to report medications running out. Clinicians were also more likely to cite controllers being a “pain to take” (vs. children) and forgetfulness (vs. caregivers) (all p < .05). There was a lack of within-triad concordance regarding barriers to adherence, especially regarding medication running out, worrying about taking a daily medication, and medication being a pain to take. Qualitative data revealed themes of competing priorities, home routines, and division of responsibility as prominent contributors to medication adherence. Conclusions: There was significant disagreement among children, caregivers, and clinicians regarding barriers to daily use of asthma medications. To tailor asthma management conversations, clinicians should understand family-specific barriers and child–caregiver disagreements.     

Medication identification in pediatric asthma (MED ID): The reliability and validity of a novel screening tool

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of medication identification (MED ID), a novel survey assessing caregiver-perceived ability to identify inhaled asthma medications. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens trial in Rochester, NY. Caregivers of adolescents with persistent asthma named the inhaled medications used by their child and identified medications on a pictorial chart. Accurate identification was defined as completed matches between listed names and selected images. Caregivers answered the MED ID survey of four scaled questions on perceived ability to identify inhaled medications. We determined internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha; examined concurrent validity by comparing MED ID sum scores with accurate identification using bivariate and multivariate analyses; and assessed the diagnostic utility of MED ID through receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: 126 caregivers (76% of enrolled) reported >1 inhaled medication; 52% of caregivers accurately identified medications. Two MED ID questions were removed during analysis. The two remaining questions had a score range of 2–10 points; higher scores indicate greater caregiver-perceived ability to identify medications. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.603. Accurate identification of medications was associated with a higher mean MED ID score (8.6 vs 7.6, p = 0.01). Accuracy was most strongly associated with MED ID scores ≥8 points (88% vs 60%, p < 0.001, Phi 0.32); findings were consistent in regression analysis. The greatest area under the curve was seen with MED ID scores ≥8 points (0.638). Conclusions: The two-item MED ID survey is a reliable and valid way to assess caregiver's ability to identify inhaled asthma medications.     

Factors Associated with Completion of a Behavioral Intervention for Caregivers of Urban Children with Asthma

Background. Rates of preventive follow-up asthma care after an acute emergency department (ED) visit are low among inner-city children. We implemented a novel behavioral asthma intervention, Pediatric Asthma Alert (PAAL) intervention, to improve outpatient follow-up and preventive care for urban children with a recent ED visit for asthma. Objective. The objective of this article is to describe the PAAL intervention and examine factors associated with intervention completers and noncompleters. Methods. Children with persistent asthma and recurrent ED visits (N = 300) were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of the PAAL intervention that included two home visits and a facilitated follow-up visit with the child’s primary care provider (PCP). Children were categorized as intervention completers, that is, completed home and PCP visits compared with noncompleters, who completed at least one home visit but did not complete the PCP visit. Using chi-square test of independence, analysis of variance, and multiple logistic regression, the intervention completion status was examined by several sociodemographic, health, and caregiver psychological variables. Results. Children were African-American (95%), Medicaid insured (91%), and young (aged 3–5 years, 56%). Overall, 71% of children randomized to the intervention successfully completed all home and PCP visits (completers). Factors significantly associated with completing the intervention included younger age (age 3–5 years: completers, 65.4%; noncompleters, 34.1%; p < .001) and having an asthma action plan in the home at baseline (completers: 40%; noncompleters: 21%; p = .02). In a logistic regression model, younger child age, having an asthma action plan, and lower caregiver daily asthma stress were significantly associated with successful completion of the intervention. Conclusions. The majority of caregivers of high-risk children with asthma were successfully engaged in this home and PCP-based intervention. Caregivers of older children with asthma and those with high stress may need additional support for program completion. Further, the lack of an asthma action plan may be a marker of preexisting barriers to preventive care.     

The development and establishment of a care map in children with asthma in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: It is often difficult to predict the timing and frequency of asthma attacks. In addition to interrupting the daily life of both the affected child and his/her family, asthma can also pose sudden danger to a child. Based on clinical observations, many asthma-affected children and their parents must constantly adjust themselves to the uncertainty of the disease, which leads to increased stress on the family. The use of care maps has demonstrated increased efficiency and effectiveness in the care of asthma patients from a variety of settings. OBJECTIVE: We designed this study to construct and evaluate a care map for asthmatic children in Taiwan. Specific attention was placed on comparing the study and control subjects by parental knowledge of asthma, medication used for asthma, hospital readmission, and health care resource usage. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The care map was constructed by in-depth interviews with eight sets of parents of children with asthma. Forty-four parents of 42 asthma children were randomized into two groups in the Allergic Clinic of the Chang Gung Children's Hospital. The experimental group of 22 parents received individual instruction and training sessions in addition to the regular care provided to the control group of 22 parents. RESULTS: Forty-two children with asthma were surveyed in this study. To examine the reliability and validity of a care map for children with asthma, a quantitative survey was conducted with 42 outpatient parents with asthmatic children. There was less emergency room attending rate in experimental group (6/month; p<0.05) The understanding of the disease was much improved in parents of experimental group (13.85+/-1.04 vs. 10.91+/-2.14; p<0.01). Furthermore, parents acquired a more positive attitude to asthma, and almost all of the control group had irregular follow-ups by a physician and had irregular use of medication. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes that a care map in children with asthma (CACM) can be used to educate parents in how to provide the best treatment plan for their children. This study also shows how a CACM can help parents train their children in the best behaviors during asthma attacks. Empathetic assessment and elimination of cultural barriers, a well-designed educational program, and a mutually developed treatment plan could significantly improve the quality of life for families and specific asthma outcomes.     

Racial disparities in family-provider interactions for pediatric asthma care

Objective: Black and Latino children experience significantly worse asthma morbidity than their white peers for multifactorial reasons. This study investigated differences in family-provider interactions for pediatric asthma, based on race/ethnicity. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of parent surveys of asthmatic children within the Population-Based Effectiveness in Asthma and Lung Diseases Network. Our study population comprised 647 parents with survey response data. Data on self-reported race/ethnicity of the child were collected from parents of the children with asthma. Outcomes studied were responses to the questions about family-provider interactions in the previous 12 months: (1) number of visits with asthma provider; (2) number of times provider reviewed asthma medications with patient/family; (3) review of a written asthma treatment plan with provider; and (4) preferences about making asthma decisions. Results: In multivariate adjusted analyses controlling for asthma control and other co-morbidities, black children had fewer visits in the previous 12 months for asthma than white children: OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.40, 0.99). Additionally, black children were less likely to have a written asthma treatment plan given/reviewed by a provider than their white peers, OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.26, 0.75). There were no significant differences by race in preferences about asthma decision-making nor in the frequency of asthma medication review. Conclusion: Black children with asthma have fewer visits with their providers and are less likely to have a written asthma treatment plan than white children. Asthma providers could focus on improving these specific family-provider interactions in minority children.     

A primary care-based asthma program improves recognition and treatment of persistent asthma in inner-city children compared to routine care

Objective: To examine whether a primary care-based asthma program that applies the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-2007 criteria to classify asthma severity increases detection of persistent asthma in inner-city children and affects “step of care” compared to routine care. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 97 consecutive children referred to the asthma program from 2011–2013. Asthma severity documented during routine health care maintenance visits was compared to the asthma severity assessed during the asthma program visit using five standardized questions and spirometry. Medication plan “step of care” was compared pre- and post- the asthma program visit. Results: 79 children, ages 5–19 years old (mean = 9.6), had spirometry tracings meeting American Thoracic Society criteria and were included in this study. 53% were male. The majority of children were Latino (45.6%) or African American (35.4%). At the asthma program visit, more children were identified with moderate or severe persistent asthma based upon clinical questions (47.9%), spirometry (56.9%) or combined criteria (75.3%) than had been identified during routine care (15.2%); all p < .05. After the asthma program visit, more children were prescribed controller medications (82.3% vs 63.3%; p < .05) and 40.6% had their medication plan stepped up. Conclusions: In this population of inner-city children, asthma severity was under-recognized and undertreated during routine care. A primary care based asthma program, which formalized applying EPR-3 criteria, increased detection of persistent asthma and led to “step-ups” in treatment plans.     

Asthma,tobacco smoke and the indoor environment: a qualitative study of sheltered homeless families

Objective: Asthma is common in homeless children with an incidence of 28–40%. There are few published studies investigating asthma in homeless children. This study examines the perspectives of both caregivers and shelter staff regarding challenges and opportunities of caring for children with asthma. Methods: A focus group of sheltered parents (n?=?10) with children who have asthma was conducted to identify barriers to optimal asthma management. Key informant interviews (n?=?6) were conducted with shelter staff to discuss the shelter systems and policies to address childhood asthma. Data were audio-recorded and transcribed. A representative analysis team performed qualitative theme analysis. Results: Key themes across 5 domains were identified: asthma education, access to asthma medication and equipment, asthma action plans, structural barriers to asthma management and environmental triggers. Parents identified multiple asthma triggers present in the shelter environment but cited lack of control as a barrier to remediation. Shelter staff desired elimination of asthma triggers but refer to the lack of resources as the primary barrier. Shelter staff favored a smoking ban on shelter property but named challenges to policy implementation. Both parents and staff identified asthma education and increased access to medications would be helpful. Conclusions: Policies to reduce environmental exposures, such as a smoking ban, to asthma triggers has the potential to improve the health of sheltered children with asthma.     

Predictors of prior asthma specialist care among pediatric patients seen in the emergency department for asthma

Background: Asthma guidelines recommend specialist care for patients experiencing poor asthma outcomes during emergency department (ED) visits. The prevalence and predictors of asthma specialist care among an ED population seeking pediatric asthma care are unknown. Objective: To examine, in an ED population, factors associated with prior asthma specialist use based on parental reports of prior asthma morbidity and asthma care. Methods: Parents of children ages 0 to 17?years seeking ED asthma care were surveyed regarding socio-demographics, asthma morbidity, asthma management and current asthma specialist care status. We compared prior asthma care and morbidity between those currently cared for by an asthma specialist versus not. Multivariable logistic regression models to predict factors associated with asthma specialist use were adjusted for parent education and insurance type. Results: Of 150 children (62% boys, mean age 4.7?years, 69% Hispanic), 22% reported asthma specialist care, 75% did not see a specialist and for 3% specialist status was unknown. Care was worse for those not seeing a specialist, including under-use of controller medications (24% vs. 64%, p?<?0.001) and asthma action plans (20% vs. 62%, p?<?0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that lack of recommendation by the primary care physician reduced the odds of specialist care (OR 0.01, 95% CI <0.01, 0.05, p?<?0.001). Conclusions: Asthma specialist care was infrequent among this pediatric ED population, consistent with the sub-optimal chronic asthma care we observed. Prospective trials should further investigate if systematic referral to asthma specialists during/after an ED encounter would improve asthma outcomes.     

Parent report and electronic medical record agreement on asthma education provided and children’s tobacco smoke exposure

Abstract

Objective: To examine the concordance between parent report and electronic medical record documentation of asthma health education provided during a single clinic visit and second-hand tobacco smoke exposure among children with asthma. Methods: Parents of children with asthma were recruited from two types of clinics using different electronic medical record systems: asthma-specialty or general pediatric health department clinics. After their child’s outpatient visit, parents were interviewed by trained study staff. Interview data were compared to electronic medical records for agreement in five categories of asthma health education and for the child’s environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Kappa statistics were used to identify strength of agreement. Chi square and t-tests were used to examine differences between clinic types. Results: Of 255 parents participating in the study 90.6% were African American and 96.1% were female. Agreement was poor across all clinics but was higher within the asthma specialty clinics than the health department clinics for smoke exposure (κ?=?0.410 versus 0.205), asthma diagnosis/disease process (κ?=?0.213 versus ?0.016) and devices reviewed (κ?=?0.253 versus ?0.089) with parents generally reporting more education provided. For the 203 children with complete medical records, 40.5% did not have any documentation regarding smoking exposure in the home and 85.2% did not have any documentation regarding exposure elsewhere. Conclusions: We found low concordance between the parent’s report and the electronic medical record for smoke exposure and asthma education provided. Un- or under-documented smoke exposure and health education have the potential to affect continuity of care for pediatric patients with asthma.