Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for residual refractive error after phakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To determine the visual and refractive outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with prior posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia. METHODS: We studied a series of 37 consecutive eyes of 31 patients who underwent LASIK or PRK for residual refractive error following collamer posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) (Staar Surgical Implantable Contact Lens) implantation into a phakic eye. Twenty-eight eyes had LASIK and nine eyes had PRK. Mean follow-up was 8.1 +/- 4.7 months after laser ablation (range, 3 to 18 mo). RESULTS: The preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction prior to phakic posterior chamber IOL implantation was -17.74 +/- 4.89 D (range, -9.75 to -28.00 D). Following phakic IOL implantation and prior to LASIK or PRK, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -2.56 +/- 2.34 D (range, -0.25 to -8.75 D). One month following LASIK or PRK, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.24 +/- 0.52 D (range, -1.50 to +1.50 D), 3 months following LASIK or PRK, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.19 +/- 0.50 D (range, -1.50 to +1.00 D). The refraction was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia in 36 eyes (97.2%) and within +/-0.50 D in 31 eyes (83.7%). Three eyes developed anterior subcapsular opacities several weeks after laser ablation, one eye developed macular hemorrhage 4 weeks after laser ablation, and one eye had corticosteroid induced ocular hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK or PRK can be used to treat the residual refractive error following posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for compound myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating patients with myopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. METHODS: Seventy-four eyes of 42 patients with myopia ranging from -4.50 to -9.88 D and astigmatism ranging from 0.50 to 4.00 D who underwent LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser and the Summit Krumeich-Barraquer microkeratome were studied. Patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Mean baseline spherical equivalent refraction was -7.12 +/- 1.70 D and cylinder was 1.62 +/- 1.72 D. At 12 months, mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.49 +/- 0.57 D and mean refractive cylinder was 0.59 +/- 0.32 D. Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction between 1 and 12 months after surgery was -0.09 +/- 0.31 D, toward myopia. At baseline, no eyes had best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or better, and 65% had 20/40 or better. At 12 months after surgery, 10% of eyes had BSCVA of 20/20 or better and 88% of eyes had 20/40 or better. The unusually low postoperative BSCVA results were thought to be due to amblyopia or existence of a higher percentage of some optical aberrations in this group of eyes. Mean uncorrected visual acuity was -1.38 +/- 0.42 LogMAR units (20/400) at baseline and -0.29 +/- 0.25 LogMAR units (20/40) at the 12-month postoperative examination. No eyes lost two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. No vision threatening complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with the Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser appeared to be safe, effective, reasonably predictable, and stable for correction of myopic astigmatism with a spherical component between -4.25 and -8.25 D and a cylindrical component between 0.50 and 4.00 D. However, astigmatism was slightly undercorrected with the algorithm used.     

Posterior chamber collamer phakic intraocular lens for myopia and hyperopia.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of correcting refractive errors using a foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. METHODS: Thirty-four foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (STAAR Collamer intraocular lens) were consecutively implanted by the same surgeon (PMP) in 19 myopic eyes and 15 hyperopic eyes. In myopic eyes, mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -16.65 +/-3.37 D (range, -8.12 to -21.25 D). In hyperopic eyes, mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +7.77+/-2.08 D (range, +4.75 to +11.75 D). Mean follow-up was 12 months (range, 6 to 18 mo). Two hyperopic eyes were not included in the data analysis because of removal of the intraocular lens due to pupillary block. RESULTS: Myopic eyes (n=19)-Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was -1.51+/-1.37 D (range, -5.50 to+0.38 D). Postoperative refraction was within +/-0.50 D in 4 eyes (21.05%) and within +/-1.00 D in 8 eyes (42.10%). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 12 eyes (63.15%) and 20/25 or better in 3 eyes (15.78%). No eye had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all eyes, 20/25 or better in 12 eyes (63.15%), and 20/20 or better in 1 eye (5.26%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 10 eyes (52.63%) and improved in 9 eyes (47.36%). A retinal detachment developed in 1 eye (5.26%). Hyperopic eyes (n=15)-Mean spherical equivalent postoperative refraction was +0.02+/-0.64 D (range, -1.00 to +1.50 D). Postoperative refraction was within +/-0.50 D in 9 eyes (69.25%) and +/-1.00 D in 12 eyes (92.30%). Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 6 eyes (46.15%) and 20/25 or better in 3 eyes (20.25%). No eye had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 7 eyes (53.84%), 20/25 or better in 6 eyes (46.15%), and 20/20 or better in 2 eyes (15.38%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was unchanged in 10 eyes (76.92%), significantly improved in 2 eyes (15.38%), and worse in 1 eye (7.69%). Two of 15 eyes (13.33%) developed a severe pupillary block necessitating removal of the implants. One eye (7.69%) developed an anterior subcapsular cataract. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive predictability appears better for hyeropia than for myopia using the STAAR Collamer foldable posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. In hyperopic eyes, development of pupillary block may occur.     

Combined surgery to correct high myopia: iris claw phakic intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of combined surgery, implantation of an Artisan phakic iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) followed by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct high myopia. METHODS: A prospective study of 6 patients (8 eyes) with high myopia who had Artisan phakic IOL implantation followed by LASIK was undertaken. The IOL was a standard -15.00-D, 6-mm diameter optical zone. Residual refractive error was corrected by LASIK. Mean follow-up was 16 +/- 4 months (range, 12 to 20 mo). RESULTS: After the second procedure (LASIK), uncorrected visual acuity ranged from 0.4 to 0.63 (mean, 0.5 +/- 0.07) at 1 month and from 0.6 to 0.7 (mean, 0.62 +/- 0.04) at 12 months. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved 2 or more lines in 62.5% (5 eyes) from preoperative values. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.68 +/- 0.23 at 1 month and -0.35 +/- 0.22 at 12 months after LASIK. All eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia following the LASIK portion of the two-stage procedure and 5 eyes were within +/-0.50 D. We had no major complications. No significant endothelial damage occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate refractive outcome, absence of major complications, stability of results, and most important, improvement in quality of vision (defined as no change in vision when illumination conditions varied, eg, at night) experienced by these highly myopic patients are reasons to continue using and improving this combined technique.     

Nine-year follow-up of a posterior chamber phakic IOL in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye of the same patient

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term results (9 years) of LASIK in one eye and phakic intraocular lens (implantable contact lens [ICL]) implantation in the fellow eye of the same patient. METHODS: A patient with high myopia underwent LASIK with a MEL 60 excimer laser in one eye (spherical equivalent refraction -9.75 diopters [D], 5-mm optical zone with no transition zone) and phakic intraocular lens (STAAR Collamer implantable contact lens [ICL]) implantation (spherical equivalent refraction -9.50 D) in the fellow eye. RESULTS: At 9 years postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -1.00 in the eye with the ICL and -1.75 D in the eye that underwent LASIK. During the first 6 postoperative months in the LASIK eye, refraction regressed, but remained stable during the remainder of follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 in the eye with the ICL and 20/30 in the LASIK eye, whereas best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes. Less night vision problems (glare and halos) were experienced in the eye with the ICL compared to the LASIK eye. Although the patient initially preferred the LASIK procedure, at last follow-up 9 years postoperatively, increased overall satisfaction was reported for the eye with the ICL compared to the LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Nine years after treatment of high myopia with the ICL and LASIK in the same patient, better quality of vision, stability, and satisfaction score were achieved in the eye with the ICL compared to the eye that had undergone LASIK. No long-term sight-threatening complications were found during followup.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -1.50 to -6.00 diopters

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of low and moderate myopia and astigmatism using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with a modified algorithm. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-six eyes of 257 patients with myopia ranging from -1.50 to -6.00 D and astigmatism of no more than 4.00 D were included. Manifest spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity were assessed at 1 month (357 eyes, 90%), 3 months (220 eyes, 56%), and 6 months (168 eyes, 42%) after LASIK. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.60 +/- 1.27 D and mean cylinder was -1.01 +/- 1.08 D. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 +/- 0.31 D and mean cylinder was -0.19 +/- 0.33 D. At 6 months follow-up, 158 eyes (94%) had a mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia; 168 eyes (100%) were within +/- 1.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 81% (136 eyes) and 20/40 or better in 100%. Two eyes (1.2%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to a decentered ablation. No eye lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Our modified LASIK algorithm with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser resulted in safe and predictable outcomes for treatment of low and moderate amounts of myopia and astigmatism.     

Laser in situ keratomileusus for mixed and simple myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for mixed and simple myopic astigmatism using bitoric ablation. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 65 eyes of 38 consecutive patients to evaluate uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and cyclopegic and manifest refraction, before and 3 and 6 months after LASIK (Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome, Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser). RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months after LASIK, 40 eyes of 24 patients (64.5%) were available for follow-up examination. Mean age was 25.9 +/- 6.6 years (range 18 to 43 yr). Mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction was -1.40 +/- 0.80 D (range -3.80 to +0.50 D) mean preoperative cylinder was -3.30 +/- 1.30 D (range -1.00 to -6.00 D). At 6 months follow-up, mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction was +0.30 +/- 0.46 D (range -0.38 to +1.88 D), mean cylinder was -0.73 +/- 0.61 D (range -2.25 to 0 D). There was a 77.8% decrease in astigmatism magnitude. According to vector analysis, mean achieved vector magnitude was 80% of intended. Fifty percent (20 eyes) had a cylinder within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. Twenty-three eyes (57.5%) had a spherical component within +/- 0.50 D. Eighty-five percent (34 eyes) had postoperative UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ten percent (four eyes) lost two lines of Snellen BSCVA, whereas 35% (14 eyes) gained one or more lines. CONCLUSIONS: Bitoric LASIK with the Moria LSK-ONE microkeratome and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was effective and safe for the reduction of cylinder in mixed and simple myopic astigmatism. Moderate undercorrection of the cylinder was evident.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia using the Lasersight 200 laser in 300 consecutive eyes

PURPOSE: To evaluate effectiveness, safety, predictability, and short-term stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the LaserSight Compac-200 Mini excimer laser with software version 9.0, for all refractive errors. METHODS: One hundred fifty consecutive patients (300 eyes) that received bilateral LASIK for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism were studied prospectively. A new 9.0 software version applying a modified nomogram that takes advantage of bilateral surgery was used. Follow-up at 6 months was available for 267 eyes (89%). RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, 131 eyes (96.32%) in the low to moderate myopia group (-1.00 to -5.99 D; n=136) had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D, and 123 eyes (90.44%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. In the high to extreme myopia group (-6.00 to -25.00 D; n=114), 97 eyes (87.08%) had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D and 78 eyes (68.42%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. In the hyperopia group (+1.00 to +6.00 D; n=50), 44 eyes (88%) had a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00 D, and 31 eyes (62%) were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Mean change in spherical equivalent refraction at 6 months was less than -0.50 D in the low to high myopia groups and -1.16 +/- 0.55 D in the extreme myopia group. At 6 months follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 73 eyes (54%) in the low to moderate myopia groups and 21 eyes (18%) in the high to extreme myopia groups. In the hyperopia group at 6 months follow-up, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 31 eyes (62%) and 20/40 or better in 41 eyes (82%). Only two eyes had a temporary loss of two or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to corneal folds that were surgically treated. Six months after LASIK, no eye had lost any lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified LASIK nomogram with the 9.0 software of the LaserSight 200 excimer laser (with a larger and smoother ablation pattern) resulted in safe and effective outcomes for the treatment of low to high myopia, astigmatism, and hyperopia.     

Implantable contact lens for high myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and biocompatibility of a collagen polymer implantable contact lens (ICL) (Staar Collamer) as a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (IOL) to correct high myopia. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. METHODS: A Staar Collamer posterior chamber phakic IOL was implanted in 38 eyes of 22 patients with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54 years). The mean preoperative myopia was -15.10 diopters (D) (range -7.75 to -29.00 D). Surgical implantation was performed through a 3.0 mm clear corneal sutureless incision using paraocular anesthesia. The patients were followed clinically up to 3 years. The mean follow-up was 13.6 months (range 6 to 24 months) for refractive data and 22.3 months (range 6 to 35 months) for complications. The possible inflammatory response to the ICL was measured using a laser flare meter in 12 eyes. RESULTS: Postoperatively, all eyes had a significant increase in uncorrected visual acuity, allowing all but 3 patients (5 eyes) to manage most activities without spectacles. The mean spherical equivalent refraction at the last examination was -2.00 D +/- 2.48 (SD) (range +0.13 to -13.00 D), within +/-1.00 D of the targeted refraction in 31 eyes (81.6%) and within +/-0.50 D in 27 eyes (71.1%). In eyes in which the preoperative myopia was less than -18.00 D (n = 28), the achieved refraction was within +/-1.00 D of the intended refraction in 27 eyes (96.4%) and within +/-0.50 D in 24 eyes (85.7%). The refraction remained stable with a statistically insignificant change (P >.05) at each interval during the follow-up. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved by 1 or more lines in 23 of 32 eyes (71.9%) at 1 year. Two eyes (6.3%) lost 1 line of BCVA. Laser flare photometry showed normal aqueous flare values (11.71 +/- 6.61 photon counts/ms) in the 12 eyes measured at least 6 months after ICL implantation. Pupillary block glaucoma requiring surgical intervention occurred in 3 patients (7.9%). One patient (2.6%) developed cataract 1.5 years after ICL implantation; both ICLs were removed, and the refractive errors were corrected by lensectomy and implantation of low-power posterior chamber IOLs. One patient (2.6%) showed progression of dry macular degeneration at 17 months. CONCLUSION: At 1 year, ICL implantation had good visual and refractive results with excellent biocompatibility. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm that significant complications do not occur in most patients over time.     

Toric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic astigmatism using an ablatable mask

BACKGROUND: To assess the results of toric laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) correction of myopic astigmatism. METHODS: A prospective study was performed over a 20 week period for consecutive patients treated for myopic astigmatism. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity, uncorrected visual acuity, spectacle refraction, videokeratography, and complications were recorded. Vector analysis was performed by the ASSORT program. RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes of 42 patients underwent toric LASIK with a Summit Technologies Apex Plus excimer laser. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -6.24 +/- 2.42 D (range, -1.63 to -14.63 D) and mean pre-operative refractive cylinder magnitude was 1.99 +/- 1.35 D (range, 0.75 to 7.00 D); mean attempted refractive cylinder correction was 1.90 +/- 1.00 D. Six months after LASIK (43 eyes followed), mean spherical equivalent refraction at the spectacle plane was -0.40 +/- 0.55 D and 31 eyes (72.1%) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. At 6 months, mean refractive cylinder magnitude was 0.74 +/- 0.70 D, mean surgically induced astigmatism was 1.46 +/- 0.86 D, mean absolute angle of error was 10.33 degrees, mean astigmatic correction index was 0.93 +/- 0.36 D, and mean index of success was 0.46 +/- 0.39. Uncorrected visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 34 eyes (79.1%) and 6/6 in 15 eyes (35%); spectacle- corrected visual acuity was 6/9 or better in 41 eyes (95.35%). Six eyes (14.0%) lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and one eye (2.3%) lost 2 lines. Ten eyes (23.3%) gained 1 line at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Toric LASIK with an ablatable mask using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser is a safe and relatively accurate procedure for the correction of myopic astigmatism.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for undercorrection after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating residual myopia and/or astigmatism following refractive keratotomy. METHODS: Fourteen eyes that had previously undergone radial and/or arcuate keratotomy were included. The surgeries were performed using the Chiron Automated Microkeratome and the VISX 20/20B excimer laser. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 12.64+/-5.02 months. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from -3.48+/-3.52 D preoperatively to -0.04+/-0.87 D postoperatively. At the last follow-up examination there were 8 eyes (57.1%) with a refraction within+/-0.50 D, and 10 eyes (71.4%) within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 4 eyes (28.6%) and 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (71.4%). Vector analysis of the astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 80%. There was no significant loss (> or = or =2 lines) of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. We observed interface epithelial ingrowth in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of residual myopia and/or astigmatism with LASIK in eyes with prior refractive keratotomy proved to be safe and effective. Careful preoperative evaluation may help to avoid complications such as reopening of incisions during surgery or postoperative ingrowth of epithelium beneath the corneal flap.     

Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism with the visian toric phakic implantable collamer lens

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the methodology described by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard Subcommittee on Astigmatism Analysis reporting a standardized method of presenting astigmatism data by laser systems that reshape the cornea also applies to toric phakic intraocular lens (IOL) data. METHODS: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration trial of the Visian Toric Implantable Collamer Lens comprised 210 eyes of 124 study patients. The mean preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent for the study cohort was -9.36 +/- 2.66 diopters (D) (range: -19.50 to -2.38 D). The mean preoperative manifest refractive cylinder was 1.94 +/- 0.84 D (range: 1.00 to 4.00 D). RESULTS: Data were arrayed using the 11 tables and 4 figures suggested in the Subcommittee paper. Interpretation of the data from a toric phakic IOL study was similar to that of laser refractive procedures. The addition of a table of manifest refractive cylinder (in the spectacle plane) over time, which provides a direct clinical measure of clinical efficacy, is suggested. Mean postoperative manifest refractive cylinder was 0.51 +/- 0.48 D (range: 0 to 3.00 D) with 65.6% of eyes having < or = 0.50 D of refractive cylinder at 12 months. A table of observed stability of the toric phakic IOL orientation within the eye obtained by slit-lamp examination also is recommended, which is a useful table not applicable in laser refractive procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented demonstrate that the methodology developed by the ANSI Standard Subcommittee on Astigmatism Analysis, with some minor additions, accurately characterizes the efficacy of toric phakic IOLs in treating astigmatism.     

Customized LASIK treatment for myopia: relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and refractive outcome

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of preoperative higher order aberrations on postoperative sphere and cylinder outcome. METHODS: Three hundred thirty myopic eyes (mean: -3.32 +/- 1.54 diopters [D], range: -1.0 to -7.0 D) treated with customized ablation using the Technolas 217z laser (Bausch & Lomb) were followed through 6 months after LASIK. Pre- and postoperative visual acuity, higher order root mean square (RMS), third order RMS, and spherical aberration were compared to study the safety and efficacy of the treatment. The relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and manifest refraction after LASIK was analyzed. RESULTS: Following LASIK, 91.5% of eyes obtained an uncorrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 and 70.3% of eyes obtained 20/16 without retreatment; 99% had a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity of > or = 20/20 (75.9% of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D). Mean value of significant increase in postoperative higher order aberrations was 0.12 +/- 0.18 microm (P<.0001). Increased spherical aberration was associated with increased myopia treatment (P<.0001). Greater positive spherical aberration after LASIK was significantly correlated to postoperative hyperopia (overcorrection). Change in third order RMS was significantly correlated to change in spherical equivalent refraction among eyes with postoperative astigmatism (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: With the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z Zyoptix software, treatment of higher order aberrations, especially third order (coma and trefoil) and spherical aberration, significantly improved postoperative refractive status.     

LASIK with an inferior hinge

PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive results and corneal pachymetric changes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with an inferior hinge. METHODS: Forty-six eyes of 23 patients who underwent LASIK with an inferior hinge were involved in this prospective study. All patients had a complete ophthalmic examination including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, computerized corneal topography (Orbscan II Corneal Topography System; Orbscan Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah), air-puff tonometry, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, and fundus examination. RESULTS: Preoperatively, mean sphere was -4.09+/-0.27 diopters (D) (range: -8.00 to -0.25 D), mean cylinder was -0.60+/-0.11 D (range: -3.25 to 0.00 D), and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -4.39+/-0.27 D (range: -8.63 to -1.50 D). At 1 month postoperatively, mean sphere was -0.04+/-0.01 D (range: -0.25 to 0.00 D), mean cylinder was -0.01+/-0.01 D (range: -0.50 to 0.00 D), and mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.04+/-0.02 D (range: -0.00 to -0.50 D). At 1 month postoperatively, no eyes lost any lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis with an inferior hinge is an alternative technique, which was safe and effective in our series. Further studies with long-term follow-up comparing the incidence of corneal ectasia in eyes with a superior hinge to that in eyes with an inferior hinge are recommended.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment on eyes with residual myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK retreatment was performed on 35 eyes of 23 patients for correction of residual myopia, with or without astigmatism, with a mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -2.17+/-0.82 D (range, -1.00 to -3.87 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of -0.55+/-0.61 D (range, 0 to -1.75 D). Retreatment was performed 3 to 18 months after primary LASIK (mean, 5.1+/-2.6 mo). The corneal flap of the previous LASIK was lifted and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: At 1 year after retreatment, manifest spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to a mean -0.23+/-0.28 D (range, 0 to -0.87 D), and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean -0.16+/-0.25 D (range, 0 to -0.75 D). Thirty-two eyes (91.5%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 33 eyes (94.3%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 11 eyes (31.4%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye after retreatment. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment was effective for correction of residual myopia or astigmatism after primary LASIK. Refractive results were predictable with good stability after 3 months. Lifting the flap during LASIK retreatment was relatively easy to perform and did not result in visual morbidity in eyes treated from 3 up to 18 months after primary LASIK.     

Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia

PURPOSE: To study a paired-match comparison between refractive lens exchange with pseudophakic IOL implant (RLE) and Artisan phakic IOL for high hyperopia. METHODS: Nineteen eyes (12 patients, 20 to 41 years old) with an Artisan phakic IOL (Model 203: 1.00-D increment) for hyperopia from +2.75 to +9.25 D were matched to 19 eyes (15 patients, 26 to 46 yr) with hyperopia from +2.75 to +7.50 D, who had refractive lens exchange (pseudophakic IOL implantation; lenses: 0.50-D increment). Average paired-match difference was 1.13 D and 7.7 years of age. RESULTS: At 1 month after surgery, 84% of refractive lens exchange/pseudophakic IOL eyes and 94% of Artisan phakic IOL eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia; 58% and 68% of eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D (P = .97). No eye lost lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and no significant changes in BSCVA were found in any eye at 1 month after surgery (P = .17). The percentage of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better improved from 79% to 89% of eyes at 1 to 2 months after phakic IOL; it remained at 89% to 82% of eyes from 1 to 2 months after refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL. The coefficient of correlation showed statistically better accuracy (intended vs. achieved refraction; P = .035) for the Artisan phakic IOL (R = 0.83) than for refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL (R = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Spherical equivalent refraction outcome and BSCVA after surgery were similar for both procedures. The Artisan phakic IOL in carefully selected patients provided a better overall outcome for young patients with high hyperopia whose accommodation was preserved, as compared to refractive lens exchange.     

Combined Intacs and posterior chamber toric implantable Collamer lens implantation for keratoconic patients with extreme myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of combined Intacs (Addition Technology, Fremont, California, USA) and posterior chamber toric implantable Collamer lens [ICLs] (Visian ICL; STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, California, USA) implantation in keratoconic patients with extreme myopia and irregular astigmatism. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, noncomparative, interventional, consecutive case series. METHODS: Three eyes of two consecutive highly myopic keratoconic patients who had undergone posterior chamber toric ICLs implantation after Intacs implantation. Implantation of posterior chamber toric ICLs was performed at intervals between six and 10 months after Intacs implantation. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, topographic findings, adverse events, and postoperative complications were noted. RESULTS: No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. An improvement in UCVA and BSCVA was found after the Intacs and toric Visian ICL procedures in all eyes. All eyes were emmetropic within 1 diopter (D), whereas the mean manifest refractive spherical equivalent refraction reduced from -18.50 +/- 2.61 D (range, -16.75 to -21.50 D) to 0.42 D (range, plano to -0.75 D). The mean difference between preoperative and last follow-up UCVA and BSCA was a gain of 6.67 +/- 1.15 lines (range, gain of six to eight lines) and 4.33 +/- 2.52 lines (range, gain of two to seven lines), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined Intacs and posterior chamber toric phakic Visian ICL implantation in a two-step procedure is an effective method for correcting keratoconic patients with extreme myopia.     

Iris-claw phakic intraocular lens for high myopia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of implanting a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) (the Artisan myopia lens) to correct high myopia. METHODS: An Artisan myopia lens was implanted in 78 consecutive eyes of 49 patients with preoperative myopia that ranged from -6.25 to -28.00 D. Mean patient age was 42.4 years. Mean follow-up was 10.7 months and all patients were followed for at least 6 months; 45 eyes had follow-up of 12 months, and 10 eyes had 24 months. The desired outcome was emmetropia in all eyes except for those eyes with preoperative myopia greater then -23.00 D. RESULTS: Fifty-three eyes (67.9%) had a postoperative refraction at the last follow-up examination within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia, and 39 eyes (50.0%) had a postoperative refraction +/- within 0.50 D of emmetropia. The postoperative refraction remained stable during the entire follow-up period. Mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved from 20/32 preoperatively to 20/25 postoperatively. Mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/32. There was no significant change in endothelial cell density from baseline. We did not encounter major complications. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Artisan myopia lens to correct high myopia resulted in a stable and fairly predictable refractive outcome. A significant endothelial cell change was not detected.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism in eyes with prior penetrating keratoplasty. METHODS: Eight eyes of 8 patients with penetrating keratoplasty had significant postoperative refractive error. Each eye received LASIK 1 year or more after penetrating keratoplasty. All were followed for 6 months or more. All patients were treated with the Chiron Technolas 217 excimer laser and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction decreased from -4.50 D (range, -3.00 to -7.25 D) to -0.75 D (range, -1.50 to +0.50 D) and the mean preoperative astigmatism decreased from 3.50 D (range, 1.50 to 5.00 D) to 1.25 D (range, 0.75 to 2.00 D). Uncorrected visual acuity improved by at least two Snellen lines in all eyes. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not change in four eyes (50%) and improved in three eyes (37.5%). CONCLUSION: LASIK effectively reduced low and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism following penetrating keratoplasty.     

Photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis for residual refractive error after phakic intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of combining phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and excimer corneal surgery to treat high myopia or myopia with astigmatism. SETTING: Service d'Ophtalmologie, H?pital Purpan, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France. METHODS: Thirty-two eyes of 28 patients with extreme myopia or myopia combined with astigmatism were treated by implantation of a phakic posterior chamber IOL. Residual refractive errors were treated no earlier than 6 weeks after IOL implantation by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in eyes with low refractive errors or by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with higher residual refractive errors. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -18.7 diopters (D). The refractive astigmatism ranged from 0 to 3.5 D. After excimer laser treatment, the SE refraction ranged from -0.5 to -2.5 D and the refractive astigmatism, from 0 to 1.5 D in the PRK group. In the LASIK group, spherical ametropia ranged from -1.5 to +1.5 D and astigmatism, from 0 to 1.0 D. After excimer laser treatment, the uncorrected visual acuity improved in all eyes but a loss of 1 line of the corrected vision after IOL implantation occurred in 22.2% of PRK-treated eyes and in 13.6% of LASIK-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Bioptic treatment of extreme myopia and myopia associated with astigmatism appears to be safer and more predictable than other methods of treatment.