Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities: long-term results for patients treated according to the Rizzoli IOR/OS-3b protocol

The results of the Rizzoli IOR/OS-3b neoadjuvant protocol for the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity are reported. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX i.v.), followed by a combination of cisplatin (CDP i.a.)/ doxorubicin (ADM i.v.). Postoperatively all patients, regardless of the histologic response, received 3 more cycles of MTX, CDP/ADM alternated with 3 cycles of ifosfamide. In the study performed between January and December 1992 43 patients were enrolled and limb salvage was performed in 39 of them (91%). The histologic response to chemotherapy was good (90% or more tumor necrosis) in 24 patients (56%) and poor (less than 90% tumor necrosis) in 19 (44%). With a minimum follow-up of 7 years, 23 pts (53%) remained continuously free of disease, 19 relapsed and one died due to unrelated cause. In spite of the high number of limb salvages performed, only 2 local recurrences were registered. The 7-year event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 53% and 68%. The hematopoietic and extrahematopoietic toxicity experienced by the patients during the entire treatment was relatively mild. These long-term results confirm that, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it is possible to cure more than 60% of patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities, avoiding amputation in most of them. These results, however, are no better than those achieved in our previous study IOR/OS-3a, in which only poor responder patients received ifosfamide during the postoperative treatment.     

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High Grade Osteosarcoma of the Extremities: Long-Term Results for Patients Treated According to the Rizzoli IOR/OS-3b Protocol

Abstract

The results of the Rizzoli IOR/OS-3b neoadjuvant protocol for the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity are reported. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX i.v.), followed by a combination of cisplatin (CDP i.a.)/ doxorubicin (ADM i.v.). Postoperatively all patients, regardless of the histologic response, received 3 more cycles of MTX, CDP/ADM alternated with 3 cycles of ifosfamide. In the study performed between January and December 1992 43 patients were enrolled and limb salvage was performed in 39 of them (91%). The histologic response to chemotherapy was good (90% or more tumor necrosis) in 24 patients (56%) and poor (less than 90% tumor necrosis) in 19 (44%). With a minimum follow-up of 7 years, 23 pts (53%) remained continuously free of disease, 19 relapsed and one died due to unrelated cause. In spite of the high number of limb salvages performed, only 2 local recurrences were registered. The 7-year event-free survival and overall survival were, respectively, 53% and 68%. The hematopoietic and extrahematopoietic toxicity experienced by the patients during the entire treatment was relatively mild.

These long-term results confirm that, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it is possible to cure more than 60% of patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities, avoiding amputation in most of them. These results, however, are no better than those achieved in our previous study IOR/OS-3a, in which only poor responder patients received ifosfamide during the postoperative treatment.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radioinduced osteosarcoma of the extremity: The Rizzoli experience in 20 cases

PURPOSE: Evaluate treatment and outcome of 20 patients with radioinduced osteosarcoma (RIO). Because of previous primary tumor treatment, RIO protocols were different from others we used for non-RIO. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1983 and 1998, we treated 20 RIO patients, ages 4-36 years (mean 16 years), with chemotherapy (two cycles before surgery, three postoperatively). The first preoperative cycle consisted of high-dose Methotrexate (HDMTX)/Cisplatinum (CDP)/Adriamycin (ADM) and the second of HDMTX/CDP/Ifosfamide (IFO). The three postoperative treatments were performed with cycles of MTX/CDP; IFO was used as single agent per cycle repeated three times. RESULTS: Two patients received palliative treatment because their osteosarcoma remained unresectable after preoperative chemotherapy. The remaining 18 patients had surgery (7 amputations, 11 resections); histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy was good in 8 patients, poor in 10. At a mean follow-up of 11 years (range, 7-22 years), 9 patients remained continuously disease-free, 10 died from osteosarcoma and 1 died from a third neoplasm (myeloid acute leukemia). These results are not significantly different from those achieved in 754 patients with conventional osteosarcoma treated in the same period with protocols used for conventional treatment. However, this later group had an 18% 3-year event-free survival after treatment of relapse vs. 0% in the RIO group. CONCLUSION: Treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy RIO seem to have an outcome that is not significantly different from that of comparable patients with conventional primary high grade osteosarcoma (5-year event-free survival: 40% vs. 60%, p = NS; 5-year overall survival 40% vs. 67%, p < 0.01).     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone and in osteosarcoma located in the extremities: Analogies and differences between the two tumors

Background: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is a rare bone tumor usually treated like osteosarcoma. Studies on analogies and differences between the two tumors have seldom been reported.Patients and methods: Between March 1982 and December 1994, 51 patients with high-grade MFH of bone and 390 with high-grade osteosarcoma were treated with the same regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All of the tumors in both groups were located in the limbs. Preoperative chemotherapy was performed according to three different, successively activated, regimens consisting of MTX/CDP intraarterially, MTX/CDP/ADM, and MTX/CDP/ADM//IFO.Results: The rate of limb salvage was the same in both the MFH (92%) and osteosarcoma (85%) patients. MFH showed a statistically significantly lower rate of good histologic response, 90% or more tumor necrosis (27% vs. 67%, P = 0.00001) for all three regimens. Despite this low chemosensitivity, the disease-free survivals of the two neoplasms were similar (67% vs. 65%).Conclusions: In terms of histologic response to primary chemotherapy, MFH has a lower chemosensitivity than osteosarcoma. Nevertheless, the two tumors have similar prognoses when treated with chemotherapy regimens based on MTX, CDP, ADM and IFO.     

Comparative Outcome of Thai Pediatric Osteosarcoma Treated with Two Protocols: the Role of High-Dose Methotrexate (HDMTX) in a Single Institute Experience

Background: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is recognized as an efficient component of therapy againstpediatric osteosarcoma in combination with other drugs such as cisplatin (CDP), carboplatin (CBDCA),doxorubicin (ADM), etoposide (VP-16) and ifosfamide (IFO). Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility andeffectiveness of the HD-MTX/CDP/DOX/VP-16/IFO [MTX(+)] protocol comparable to CDP/ADM/CBDCA/IFO[MTX(-)] for treating childhood osteosarcoma at Ramathibodi Hospital (1999-2014). Materials and Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of osteosarcoma patients aged less than 18 years treated with twochemotherapeutic regimens between 1999 and 2014. A total of 45 patients received the MTX(-) and 21 the MTX(+)protocol. Results: Overall limb-salvage and amputation rate were 12.9% and 77.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis results for 3-year disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) regardless of treatmentregimens were 43.4±6.0% and 53.2±6.1% respectively. The 3-year DFS and OS were improved significantlywith the MTX(+) protocol compared to MTX(-) protocol (p=0.010 and p=0.009, log rank test) [69.8±10.5%,79.8±9.1% for MTX(+) and 31.1±6.9%, 42.2±7.4% for MTX(-) protocol, respectively]. Patients with metastaticosteosarcoma treated with the MTX(+) protocol had statistically significant higher 3-year DFS and OS thanthose treated with the MTX(-) protocol (66.7±13.6% and 15.0±8.0% for 3-year DFS, p=0.010, 73.3±13.2% and20±8.9% for 3-year OS, p=0.006, respectively). The independent risk factors for having inferior 3-year DFSand OS were poor histological response (tumor necrosis <90%) and treatment with the MTX(-) protocol. Themultivariate analysis identified only the treatment with the MTX(-) protocol as an independent predictor ofinferior OS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.53 (95% confidence interval of 1.2-10.41, p=0.022). Conclusions: Ourstudy demonstrated the tolerability, feasibility and efficacy of the HDMTX-based regimen improving the survivalrate in pediatric osteosarcoma cases, in line with reports from developed countries.     

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Extremity Osteosarcoma: Preliminary Results of the Rizzoli's 4th Study

A neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol (1/93-1/95) for extremity osteosarcoma preoperatively using high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) as single agent per cycle and three different combinations of other drugs (CDP/IFO,CDP/ADM,IFO/ADM) is reported. The four drugs were used postoperatively as single agents. Treatment was uniform, but suspended earlier if total necrosis was attained. An improvement was found in the results of the previous study using only IFO postoperatively, with 16/119 patients (97%) avoiding amputation, and 38 (32%) attaining complete necrosis. At a 3-year (2-4 years) mean follow-up, 92 patients (76%) remained continuously disease-free, 2 died of chemotherapy-related toxicity and 25 suffered relapse. Projected 3-year DFS also improved (75% vs. 60%; p=0.04). Despite limb salvage, local recurrences (6.3%) and infections were few, although postoperative chemotherapy was restarted within a week. Therefore, until new effective drugs are found, expertise in using the four known drugs may improve cure rate and help to avoid amputation in almost all patients.     

Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) for osteosarcoma of the extremities. The Istituto Rizzoli Experience in 127 patients treated preoperatively with intravenous methotrexate (high versus moderate doses) and intraarterial cisplatin

Between March 1983 and June 1986 127 patients with localized osteosarcoma of the extremity were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of methotrexate (MTX) (high or moderate doses) followed by 6 days by cisplatin (CDP). Surgery was an amputation or a rotation plasty, or a limb salvage. Necrosis was good in 52% of cases, fair in 36%, and poor in 12%. Postoperative chemotherapy consisted of Adriamycin (doxorubicin [ADM]) and bleomycin (BCD) for poor responders; and ADM, MTX, and CDP for fair responders. Good responders were treated as fair responders or with only MTX and CDP. At a 47-month follow-up, 66 patients remained continuously disease free and 61 patients developed metastases. Six of these patients had also a local recurrence. According to the grade of necrosis, the cumulative disease-free probability at 5 years was 67% for good responders, 42% for fair responders, and for poor responders 10% at 45 months. According to the doses of MTX, survival at 5 years was 58% for patients who received high doses and 42% for patients treated with moderate doses. No differences in the rate of survivors were observed between amputated patients and patients treated with limb salvage. The authors conclude that (1) a limb salvage procedure is possible in about 70% of cases and as safe as demolitive surgery, if adequate surgical margins are achieved; (2) good responders have a better prognosis than fair and poor responders if postoperative chemotherapy is sufficiently prolonged and also includes ADM; (3) a different postoperative chemotherapy for poor responders did not improve their prognosis; and (4) a multidrug regimen using high doses of MTX is probably more effective than moderate doses.     

A comparison of methods of loco-regional chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy as neo-adjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity.

AIM: Our experience of pre-operative intraarterial (i.a.) vs intravenous (i.v.) infusion of cisplatinum (CDP) in a multiagent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity is reported. METHODS: Two successive randomized studies were performed. In the first, pre-operatively, CDP i.a. vs CDP i.v. was applied in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and adriamycin (ADM) within a three-drug regimen. In the second, a combination of HDMTX, ADM and IFO, within a four-drug regimen was tested. RESULTS: The rate of responses to chemotherapy (tumour necrosis > or = 90%) was significantly higher (P<0.04) for the 142 patients treated with the four-drug regimen than in the 79 patients treated with a three-drug regimen (76%vs 62%). According to the route of CDP infusion, in the three-drug regimen the rate of responses was significantly higher (P=0.004) in patients treated with i.a. CDP (77%) than in patients treated i.v. (46%); with the four-drug regimen the rate of response was not significantly different in patients treated i.a. (81%) and in patients treated i.v. (71%). No significant differences in the rates of limb salvages, local recurrence and event-free survival (EFS) were seen between the i.a. and the i.v. groups. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity, the i.a. infusion of CDP does not offer any significant advantage when this drug is used within an aggressive, multiagent, pre-operative four-drug regimen. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.     

Metastatic osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND: The outcome of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma treated in two consecutive trials from 1986 to 1997 was analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin-based multiagent chemotherapy and to identify prognostic factors. The initial study (OS-86) used ifosfamide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate, and the subsequent study (OS-91) used the same agents at similar doses, but carboplatin was substituted for cisplatin. METHODS: Twelve patients (median age, 15.1 yrs) were treated in OS-86 for osteosarcoma metastatic to the lung only (11 patients) or bone only (1 patient), and 17 patients (median age, 15.1 yrs) were treated in OS-91 for osteosarcoma metastatic to the lung only (12 patients), bone only (2 patients), lung and bone (2 patients), or other site (1 patient). RESULTS: Patients with metastatic disease enrolled in OS-86 and those with metastatic disease enrolled in OS-91 did not differ in terms of demographic features, histologic subtype, site of primary tumor, or site of metastases. There was a difference in survival according to treatment protocol (P = 0.054). All survivors (four of whom were enrolled in OS-86 and one of whom was enrolled in OS-91) had lung metastases only. Five-year survival estimates for patients with lung metastases only were 45.5 +/- 13.7% (OS-86) and 8.3 +/- 5.6% (OS-91) (P = 0.084). Unilateral lung metastases (P = 0.006), no more than three lung nodules (P = 0.014), and surgical remission (P = 0.001) were associated with improved survival probability. CONCLUSIONS: The poor outcome of patients with metastatic osteosarcoma treated in OS-91 justifies the use of cisplatin with its associated toxicity in patients with high-risk disease.     

Influence of Adriamycin Dose in the Outcome of Patients with Osteosarcoma Treated with Multidrug Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results of Two Sequential Studies

Summary

The results of two sequential studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities performed at Rizzoli Institute between 1986 and 1991 in 228 patients are presented. In both studies preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisplatinum (CDP) and adriamycin (ADM). Postoperatively the good responder patients were treated with the same drugs used before surgery while in the poor responder patients ifosfamide was added to these three drugs. The preoperative treatment was the same in both studies while after surgery in the second protocol either the cumulative dose of ADM (270 mg/m² instead of 360 mg/m²) or the single dose per cycle of this drug (60 mg/m² instead of 90 mg/m²) was reduced. These changes in the last protocol were done to reduce the cardiotoxicity of ADM that was high in the first study (2 deaths and 1 heart transplantation). Since in the last protocol – in comparison with the first protocol – after surgery chemotherapy was restarted earlier and ADM was administered not as a single drug but in combination with the CDP the dose intensity of ADM was unchanged while the dose intensity of MTX, CDP and ifosfamide was higher than in the first study. The preliminary results of the 84 patients treated in the second study show a 2-year disease free survival significantly lower than that achieved in the 144 patients treated in the first study (37/51 – 73% vs 123/144 – 85%: P < 0.008). In addition, even if in the last study there were no cases of clinical cardiotoxicity due to ADM, there was a significantly higher percentage of severe myelodepression that led to two deaths for infectious complications. These results suggest that in neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma the total dose of ADM and/or the single dose per cycle of the same drug are an important determinant of outcome and that increasing the dose-intensity of less toxic but less active agents, MTX, CDP and ifosfamide, at the expense of the more active and more toxic agent, ADM, can lead to a poorer outcome without reducing toxicity.     

The importance of dose-intensity in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: a retrospective analysis of high-dose methotrexate, cisplatinum and adriamycin used preoperatively

The relationship between dose-intensity and outcome was retrospectively analyzed in 125 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1986 and 1988. Before surgery, chemotherapy was performed with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) i.v. followed by cisplatinum (CDP) i.a. and adriamycin (ADM) i.v. Postoperative chemotherapy was tailored according to the necrosis induced by preoperative treatment. Patients who were "good responders" had 31-weeks of chemotherapy with the same drugs utilized preoperatively, while "poor responder" patients received a longer treatment (40 weeks) in which ifosfamide and etoposide (VP-16) were added to HDMTX, CDP and ADM. At a median follow-up of 2 years (1-3 years) 100 patients (80%) remained continuously disease-free and 25 patients relapsed: 24 with lung metastases and 1 with local recurrence. According to the real dose-intensity received, calculated as a percentage of the dose intensity projected by the protocol, the continuously disease-free survival was 87% in the 82 patients who received 80% or more of the scheduled dose-intensity and only 65% for the 43 patients who received less than 80% of the projected dose-intensity. This difference is highly significant (P less than 0.01). These results suggest that in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma the real dose-intensity delivered is a determinant of treatment outcome and therefore every effort should be made to avoid reductions of doses and delays of cycles of chemotherapy in these patients.     

The Importance of Dose-Intensity in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Osteosarcoma: A retrospective analysis of high-dose methotrexate,cisplatinum and adriamycin used preoperatively

Summary

The relationship between dose-intensity and outcome was retrospectively analyzed in 125 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at our institution with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1986 and 1988. Before surgery, chemotherapy was performed with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) i.v. followed by cisplatinum (CDP) i.a. and adriamycin (ADM) i.v. Postoperative chemotherapy was tailored according to the necrosis induced by preoperative treatment. Patients who were «good responders» had 31-weeks of chemotherapy with the same drugs utilized preoperatively, while «poor responder» patients received a longer treatment (40 weeks) in which ifosfamide and etoposide (VP-16) were added to HDMTX, CDP and ADM. At a median follow-up of 2 years (1-3 years) 100 patients (80%) remained continuously disease-free and 25 patients relapsed: 24 with lung metastases and 1 with local recurrence. According to the real dose-intensity received, calculated as a percentage of the dose intensity projected by the protocol, the continuously disease-free survival was 87% in the 82 patients who received 80% or more of the scheduled dose-intensity and only 65% for the 43 patients who received less than 80% of the projected dose-intensity. This difference is highly significant (P < 0.01).

These results suggest that in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma the real dose-intensity delivered is a determinant of treatment outcome and therefore every effort should be made to avoid reductions of doses and delays of cycles of chemotherapy in these patients.     

Nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: results of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol (IOR/OS-3) with high-dose methotrexate, intraarterial or intravenous cisplatin, doxorubicin, and salvage chemotherapy based on histologic tumor response

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: From 1986 to 1989, a study for the treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity (IOR/OS-2) was carried out at the Rizzoli Institute. The cumulative dose of doxorubicin delivered was 480 mg/m2, and severe heart failure developed in 5 (3%) of the 164 treated patients. The specific aim of the subsequent study was to assess the efficacy of a protocol, similar to IOR/OS-2, but with a reduced cumulative dose of doxorubicin (390 mg/m2). Additional aims were to assess the role of the route of infusion (intraarterial or intravenous) of cisplatin on histologic response of the primary tumor and the use of ifosfamide as salvage chemotherapy in poor responders. METHODS: The new chemotherapy regimen (IOR/OS-3) was comprised of a preoperative phase with methotrexate (10 g/m2), cisplatin (120 mg/m2 intraarterially or intravenously), and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2). After surgery, the same drugs were administered, with the addition of ifosfamide (10 g/m2) in patients who had a poor histologic response to primary chemotherapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients entered the study. The rate of good histologic response was 64% with intraarterial cisplatin and 43% with intravenous cisplatin (P = 0.05). The 8-year event-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 61%, respectively, with no significant difference according to the histologic response. No cases of clinical doxorubicin-induced cardiopathy were recorded. Event-free and overall survival did not significantly differ from those achieved with IOR/OS-2 (8-year disease-free and overall survival, respectively 63% and 72%). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the doxorubicin cumulative dose avoided episodes of cardiotoxicity, without consequences on the efficacy of treatment. The addition of ifosfamide was an effective "salvage" therapy for poor responders. A better histologic response with intraarterial cisplatin was observed, but owing to the availability of an effective salvage therapy for poor responders, the advantages in terms of histologic response did not compensate for the cost and discomfort for the patients of this modality of infusion of cisplatin.     

Clinical analysis of Chinese limb osteosarcoma patients treated by two combinations of methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide

Aims: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxic side effects of two combinations of methotrexate, cisplatin, doxorubicin and ifosfamide on treating Chinese osteosarcoma patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 185 osteosarcoma patients treated with the four drugs mentioned above. A total of 93 patients received the Italian therapeutic treatment (IOR‐OS/N‐5: Instituto Ortopedic Rizzoli‐Section of Osteosacorma/Neoadjuvant chemotherapy‐5) and the remaining 92 patients received the therapeutic treatment optimized by our department. We compared the efficacy and toxic side effects of these two therapies. Results: The limb salvage rates, 3‐year recurrence rates and 3‐year metastasis rates of IOR‐OS/N‐5 and our optimized treatment were 52.7 and 58.7%; 20.9 and 11.4% and 44.1 and 27.2%, respectively. The 3‐year survival rates and the 3‐year disease‐free survival rates of IOR‐OS/N‐5 and our optimized treatments were 62.4 and 78.4%; and 53.6 and 67.8%, respectively. Overall survival and disease‐free survival rates were significantly different between these two treatments (P = 0.032 and 0.024, respectively). Liver function with degree III and IV damage accounted for 35.2 and 16.6% of the total adverse reactions in the IOR‐OS/N‐5 and our optimized treatment groups, respectively. Degree III–IV neutropenia accounted for 22.6 and 40.0%, respectively, in the IOR‐OS/N‐5 and optimized treatments. Conclusion: The optimization of MTX, DDP, DOX and IFO based on Chinese patients' physiology increased the tolerance and efficacy for the treatment of osteosarcoma.     

Pediatric osteosarcoma: therapeutic strategies, results, and prognostic factors derived from a 10-year experience

Ninety-eight pediatric patients were treated with three separate protocols (Treatment and investigation of Osteosarcoma [TIOS] I, II, and III) and 47 developed recurrent disease (metastases and/or local recurrence). Actuarial overall disease-free survival (hereafter designated survival) was 43%. Over 90% of the patients were treated initially with preoperative intraarterial cisplatin (CDP). Postoperative chemotherapeutic regimens comprised high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (MTX-CF), Adriamycin [( ADR] doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cyclophosphamide. Primary definitive treatment comprised amputation or limb salvage (TIOS I and TIOS III). Patients treated with preoperative CDP and surgery (TIOS I and III) had a 62% survival. Patients in TIOS II refused surgical extirpation; they were treated exclusively with chemotherapy and had a 23% survival. Survival in patients treated with amputation was 55% and limb salvage 58%. Prognostic factors considered significant in relation to development of pulmonary metastases comprised tumor burden (P = .04) and the percentage of tumor necrosis induced by preoperative chemotherapy (P = .01). Histopathologic subtype was marginally significant: chondroblastic was more favorable as opposed to osteoblastic (P = .05). These findings are compared with results and prognostic factors published in the literature.     

甲氨蝶呤、顺铂、阿霉素和异环磷酰胺治疗ⅡB期肢体骨肉瘤的临床观察

目的 观察大剂量甲氨蝶呤（MTX）、顺铂（DDP）、阿霉素（ADM）和异环磷酰胺（IFO）4种药物两种不同组合方案治疗ⅡB期肢体骨肉瘤的疗效及毒副反应。方法 回顾性分析接受4种药物化疗方案的185例ⅡB期肢体骨肉瘤患者,其中93例接受意大利IOR-OS／N-5方案（MTX 8～12g／m²静滴6h,d₁;用药后12h亚叶酸钙解救12次,每次15mg;DDP 80～100mg／m²、ADM 60mg／m²静滴,d8;IFO 2.0g／m²静滴,d₂₁～d₂₅;美司那400mg每天IFO用后第0、4、8h静滴）,92例接受优化方案（除ADM由第8天静滴改为第21天与IFO联用外,其他同IOR-OS／N-5方案）。比较两种方案的疗效及毒副反应。结果 IOR-OS／N-5方案和优化方案组的保肢率分别为52.7％（49／93）和58.7％（54／92）。两组患者的3年复发率分别为14.0％、7.6％,3年转移率分别为47.3％、30.4％,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;两组患者的3年生存率分别为57.0％、75.0％,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组患者的中位无病生存时间（DFS）分别为22.2个月（95％CI：16.2～28.2个月）和29.0个月（95％CI：23.8～34.3个月）,差异有统计学意义（P=0.024）;两组患者的中位总生存时间（OS）分别为32.2个月（95％CI：23.2～38.2个月）和36.1个月（95％CI：33.8～44.3个月）,差异有统计学意义（P=0.032）。两组患者的主要毒副反应为肝功能损害、骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐等。其中3、4级肝功能损害的发生率分别为35.2％、16.6％,3、4级白细胞减少的发生率分别为22.6％、30.2％。结论 将大剂量MTX、DDP、ADM和IFO这4种药物进行优化组合治疗骨肉瘤患者的耐受性好,疗效提高。     

Selected benefits of thoracotomy and chemotherapy for sarcoma metastatic to the lung

To determine the benefit of aggressive surgical therapy, we studied 77 consecutive patients presenting to our sarcoma registry with pulmonary metastases. Detailed follow-up was available on all patients; the median follow-up of the 13 long-term survivors was 72 months from the date of diagnosis of the primary tumor. Survival of these 77 patients with metastatic disease was independent of the size, location, and histology of the primary tumor. Once metastases developed, survival of patients with pulmonary metastases was not influenced by the extent of surgical resection of the primary tumor or by the use of radiation therapy. Pulmonary metastases were initially treated with thoracotomy and metastasectomy in 34 patients. The median survival after thoracotomy was 26 months. Seven patients were alive more than 4 years after their diagnosis. Pulmonary metastases were treated with chemotherapy alone in 43 patients. Although the survival was shorter (median survival 14 months) in patients treated with chemotherapy, an objective response to chemotherapy was obtained in 13 (30%) patients. Four of these patients were alive 4 years after their diagnosis. These data demonstrate that both thoracotomy and chemotherapy are associated with long-term survival of patients with sarcoma metastatic to the lung. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Chemotherapy of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with a combination of adriamycin and DTIC or adriamycin and ifosfamide

Between 1982 and 1986, 38 patients with soft tissue sarcomas were treated with a combination of ADM/DTIC (group A), another 45 (group B) received ADM/IFO between 1986 and 1990. Clinical characteristics were comparable in both groups. Remission rate was 34% in group A and 43% in group B. Duration of remission was 10 months and median survival 13 months in both groups. Toxicity, especially myelotoxicity, was severe without marked differences between both groups. We conclude that adriamycin/DTIC and adriamycin/ifosfamide are both active regimens in metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, nevertheless, overall prognosis remains poor.     

Increased survival, limb preservation, and prognostic factors for osteosarcoma.

Preoperative intraarterial (IA) cisplatin (CDP) was administered to 92 patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma. The ages of the patients ranged from 4 to 28 years. Sixty-four patients (70%) received 2 or 3 preoperative courses and 28 (30%) received 4 or more. Sixty-two specimens were available for pathologic examination to assess the degree of tumor necrosis. More than 90% tumor destruction was observed in 16 of 42 patients (38%) who received 1 to 3 preoperative courses as opposed to 17 of 20 (85%) who received 4 or more courses. Patients who received 4 or more courses had a 2-fold probability of achieving more than 90% tumor necrosis, and 68% underwent conservative surgery. Of those who received 3 or less courses, 23% underwent conservative surgery. Postoperatively, patients were treated with intravenous (IV) CDP alternating with doxorubicin (ADR) (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH). Pulmonary metastases developed in 36 patients, bone metastases in 2, and local recurrence in 6. Two patients died of cardiac failure without evidence of disease. Thus, 46 patients (50%) were continuously free of disease 18 to 78 months after diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that male sex, low grade preoperative chemotherapy-induced necrosis, and nonosteoblastic histologic condition were prognostic factors predictive of recurrence, while male sex and large tumor size were prognostic factors predictive of death. These results are comparable with those reported by other centers and are superior to our previous experiences that yielded survival rates of 5% to 10%. A substantial number of patients also had the opportunity to achieve tumor removal with conservative surgery.     

Intra-operative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the stomach

Intra-operative radiotherapy (IOR) was performed for the treatment of 101 patients with gastric cancer. Doses of 28 to 35 Gy with electron beams were delivered during the surgical procedure to tumour beds, high risk lymphnodes and/or remaining cancer nests after gastrectomy. Five-year survival rates were 87.2% for patients with Stage I disease, 83.5% for Stage II, 62.3% for Stage III and 14.7% for Stage IV. Compared with the data on 110 patients treated by surgery alone, IOR has yielded better results in patients with locally advanced disease. Based on these results, indications of IOR for gastric cancer were discussed.