贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌疗效分析

目的 观察贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌的疗效和不良反应.方法 35例复发性卵巢癌患者应用贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇作为二线或多线治疗.结果 35例患者均可进行疗效评价,有效率为54.29%,疾病控制率为82.86%.不良反应主要有骨髓抑制、恶心呕吐、高血压、蛋白尿等,大多为轻度.结论 贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇治疗复发性卵巢癌安全有效,患者可耐受,是复发性卵巢癌可选择的治疗方案之一.     

贝伐珠单抗与阿帕替尼治疗复发性宫颈癌的疗效及安全性比较

目的 比较贝伐珠单抗与阿帕替尼治疗复发性宫颈癌的疗效及安全性.方法 选取复发性宫颈癌患者46例,随机分为贝伐珠单抗组和阿帕替尼组,各23例.在紫杉醇+顺铂的化疗方案上,分别予以贝伐珠单抗和阿帕替尼治疗.对比2种方法的疗效和安全性.结果 贝伐珠单抗组与阿帕替尼组的总有效率(69.57％vs 82.61％)无显著差异(P>...     

贝伐单抗联合顺铂治疗复发性脑胶质瘤的疗效研究

目的探究贝伐单抗联合顺铂治疗复发性恶性脑胶质瘤的疗效。方法选取2013年1月至2018年1月期间德州市第二人民医院收治的112例复发性恶性脑胶质瘤患者临床资料为研究对象,依据随机数字表法分为对照组(n=56)和观察组(n=56)。对照组患者给予顺铂治疗,观察组患者给予贝伐单抗联合顺铂治疗。比较两组患者的临床疗效、生存状况、生活质量评分和不良反应发生情况。结果观察组的治疗总有效率(8750％)高于对照组(6786％);治疗后随访10个月,观察组患者的控制率、5个月生存率和10个月生存率分别为9821％、8929％和8393％,高于对照组患者的6607％、6607％和5536％;治疗后较治疗前两组患者的生活质量各项评分均改善,且观察组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<005)。不良反应总发生率对照组(3215%)与对照组(3571％)相比差异无统计学意义(P>005)。 结论给予复发性恶性脑胶质瘤患者贝伐单抗联合顺铂治疗较单纯给予顺铂治疗能够有效改善其临床疗效、生活质量,提高其生存率,且无明显不良反应。     

贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇+卡铂治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的疗效分析

目的 探讨贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇+卡铂治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的疗效。方法 根据治疗方案的不同将126例晚期卵巢癌患者分为化疗组和贝伐珠单抗组,每组63例。治疗前后,检测两组患者血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、基质金属蛋白酶2(MMP2)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、CD4⁺、CD8⁺、CD3⁺水平,记录两组患者的不良反应及无进展生存期,比较两组患者的疗效。结果 治疗后,贝伐珠单抗组患者VEGF、MMP2、CEA、CA125、CD8⁺水平均明显低于化疗组,CD4⁺、CD3⁺水平均明显高于化疗组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。贝伐珠单抗组患者总有效率高于化疗组,无进展生存期长于化疗组,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。两组患者不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论 贝伐珠单抗联合紫杉醇+卡铂化疗可抑制晚期卵巢癌转移及扩散,明显改善患者的免疫功能,延长无进展生存期,疗效确切。     

贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂治疗肺癌恶性胸水的临床疗效

目的：比较贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂与单药顺铂两组方案治疗肺癌恶性胸水的安全性和有效性。方法：选取2014 年11月至2017 年11 月葫芦岛市医院肿瘤内科27 例确诊为肺癌恶性胸水的患者,其中14 例采用贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂治疗方案、13 例采用顺铂方案,比较两组临床疗效及不良反应。结果：治疗前两组患者的一般情况比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂组患者的近期疗效优于顺铂组（92.9% vs 61.5%,P<0.05）。治疗过程中不良反应主要为骨髓抑制和消化道不适反应等,两组患者不良反应发生率相近,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与单药顺铂方案相比,应用贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂方案治疗肺癌恶性胸水患者具有更好的近期疗效,两种方案的不良反应相当。     

脂质体多柔比星治疗淋巴瘤的疗效

目的：探讨脂质体多柔比星用于临床治疗淋巴瘤的疗效以及安全性。方法：选取90例淋巴瘤患者作为研究对象,均采用脂质体多柔比星治疗,对患者临床资料、治疗结果、随访情况等进行回顾性分析。结果：90例淋巴瘤患者治疗总有效率为74.44%,初治者总有效率（79.25%）与复治者（67.57%）相近,组间无明显差异（P >0.05）。常见不良反应为骨髓抑制、心电图异常、心功能异常等;患者随访3年生存率为62.22%,初治者（71.70%）略高于复治者（48.65%）,但组间比较差异无显著性（P >0.05）。结论：采用脂质体多柔比星临床治疗淋巴癌,效果显著,不良反应较小,安全性高,建议在临床可作为治疗淋巴瘤的首选药物进行推广应用。     

脂质体多柔比星治疗淋巴瘤患者的疗效及安全性分析

背景与目的:蒽环类药物在淋巴瘤化疗中有很重要的地位,但相关不良反应限制了其在临床中的应用,尤其是心脏毒性。本文旨在分析脂质体多柔比星联合治疗淋巴瘤患者的有效率及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2006年1月—2011年10月在北京大学肿瘤医院淋巴肿瘤科住院并接受脂质体多柔比星联合化疗的68例患者的临床资料。其中初治患者47例,复治患者21例。应用SPSS 17.0统计软件统计分析治疗有效率和治疗相关不良反应,评价脂质体多柔比星的疗效及安全性。结果:68例患者中弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(diffuselarge B-cell lymphoma,DLBCL)42例。总有效率(ORR)为73.5%,其中完全缓解(CR)率57.4%,部分缓解(PR)率19.1%。初治DLBCL的ORR率为74.3%,CR率为60%,其中应用R-CCOP方案治疗患者的ORR率为81.5%,CR率为66.7%。骨髓抑制是最常见不良反应,3～4级粒细胞减少症的发生率55.9%;心电图异常发生率54.4%,3例患者出现心功能异常。仅1例伴有严重内科疾病的患者出现肺部感染并死亡。结论:使用脂质体多柔比星治疗淋巴瘤的有效率和安全性均较好。     

铂类耐药复发转移性卵巢癌贝伐单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗临床观察

目的 在女性生殖系统肿瘤中卵巢癌的发病率及死亡率居于前列,在治疗期间可能出现耐药现象或远处转移,给后续治疗带来困难,影响患者预后,且此时应用传统化疗效果较差.本研究主要观察贝伐单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗铂类耐药的复发或转移性卵巢癌的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析我院2010-09 —2013-10经手术确诊为卵巢癌,术后使用以铂类为基础的药物化疗后6个月内复发,且化疗期间病情稳定的58例患者,分为两组,其中28例采用贝伐单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇方案治疗(联合组),患者d1、d8、d15接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇100 mg/m2,同时于d1、d15接受10 mg/kg贝伐单抗治疗;30例采用单药白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗(单药组),第d1、d8和d15天接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇100 mg/m2,两种治疗方案均为28 d为1个周期.分析两组患者的疗效和不良反应并进行随访.结果 联合组与单药组的客观有效率分别为53.57％(15/28)和36.67％(11/30),x2=3.425,P=0.025;中位无进展生存期分别为8.9和6.6个月,x2=11.892,P=0.001;中位生存期分别为16.8和15.6个月,差异有统计学意义,x2=5.376,P=0.02.联合化疗组较单药组增加的不良反应主要有高血压、出血和蛋白尿,发生率分别为14.28％、10.71％和10.71％,但均为Ⅰ～Ⅱ级,经药物治疗后均可控制,不影响后续化疗,两组最常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制及消化道反应,两组出现Ⅲ-Ⅳ级的骨髓抑制之间的差异无统计学意义,P＞0.05.结论 贝伐单抗联合白蛋白结合紫杉醇治疗铂类耐药的复发或转移性卵巢癌临床效果较好,较单药化疗组生存期延长,且患者耐受性较好具有很好的临床应用前景.     

白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性卵巢癌的临床分析

目的:探讨白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性卵巢癌疗效、不良反应和生存情况。方法:选取经病理学诊断为卵巢上皮癌患者78例,既往使用过紫杉类、吉西他滨等药物治疗后进展,接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗方案治疗。具体方案:第1天接受白蛋白结合型紫杉醇260mg/m2、第2天接受贝伐珠单抗15mg/m2,21d为1个周期,每个周期评价不良反应,2个周期评价疗效。结果:78例患者均可进行疗效评价,无完全缓解病例,部分缓解9例,稳定42例,进展27例,有效率为11.5%（9/78）,临床获益率为65.4%(51/78)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、消化道反应、乏力、脱发、外周神经毒性、皮疹、高血压、肌肉酸痛,不良反应多为I级和II级毒性,患者对毒副作用均可耐受,未发生治疗相关性死亡。结论:白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性卵巢癌可获得较好的疗效,不良反应可以耐受。     

适形放疗联合托泊替康化疗治疗铂类耐药的复发卵巢癌临床观察

  目的   观察三维适形放疗联合托泊替康化疗治疗铂类耐药复发卵巢上皮癌的疗效及不良反应。   方法   回顾性分析2008年6月至2011年6月山东省肿瘤医院收治的铂类耐药复发卵巢上皮癌患者42例,其中三维适形放疗联合托泊替康化疗22例（放化疗组）,单药托泊替康化疗20例（单纯化疗组）。放化疗组以15MV X线行三维适形照射,1.8~2.0 Gy/次/d,5次/周,总剂量45~65Gy,平均中位剂量为52.5 Gy。于放疗开始后第1周行托泊替康化疗2.0 mg/m2,第1、8、15天给药,每28天重复。单纯化疗组于第1周开始行托泊替康化疗4.0 mg/m2,第1、8、15天给药,每28天重复。   结果   放化疗组、单纯化疗组中位随访时间分别为18.5（2~37.7）个月、10.8（1.5~29.6）个月;总缓解率分别为42.1%（8/19）、11.1%（2/18）;临床获益率分别为68.4%（13/19）、22.2%（4/18）,两组比较有显著性差异（P < 0.05）。中位疾病无进展期分别为9.8、6.6个月,两组比较有显著性差异（P < 0.001）。中位生存期分别为19.7、12.5个月,两组比较有显著性差异（P < 0.05）。Ⅲ度消化道反应发生率分别为26.3%（5/19）、16.7%（3/18）;Ⅲ~Ⅳ级血液学毒性发生率分别为21.1%（4/19）、22.2%（4/18）,两组比较无显著性差异（P>0.05）。   结论   三维适形放疗联合托泊替康化疗对铂类耐药复发卵巢上皮癌有较好的疗效,且不良反应轻微,可作为复发患者的补救治疗措施。      

白蛋白结合型紫杉醇单药与吉西他滨单药治疗晚期铂类耐药复发性卵巢癌的疗效比较

目的:探讨白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与吉西他滨方案在晚期复发卵巢癌中的疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析56例中晚期复发性卵巢癌患者,56例患者均为铂类耐药复发患者分别采用白蛋白结合型紫杉醇与吉西他滨方案化疗。21 天为1疗程,共行6周期化疗,对两组患者的疗效进行评估观察,并比较治疗后两组的不良反应。结果:白蛋白结合型紫杉醇组治疗有效率为 39.3%(10/28),吉西他滨组治疗有效率为25.0%(7/28),两组对比差异无统计学意义(P=0.38＞0.05);白蛋白结合型紫杉醇组中位无进展生存期(mPFS)为 8.2个月,吉西他滨mPFS为6.4 个月,两组对比差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。白蛋白结合型紫杉醇组没有合并糖尿病者与合并糖尿病者有效率比较同样采用Fisher精确检验 P=0.062＞0.05,两组有效率无差别。白蛋白结合型紫杉醇亚组中无糖尿病的患者与合并糖尿病的患者的中位mPFS分别为 8.9、4.2个月,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),不良反应中性粒细胞比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),血小板降低、肝损伤、肾损伤不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论:白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗晚期复发性卵巢癌疗效较吉西他滨治疗疗效较好,患者中位无进展生存期较长;另外我们发现伴有糖尿病的患者应用白蛋白结合型紫杉醇组不良反应高于无糖尿病的患者,疗效亦偏差。     

紫杉醇治疗复发卵巢上皮癌31例临床疗效观察

目的比较紫杉醇为主的联合化疗在治疗复发卵巢上皮癌时,紫杉醇周疗与月疗不同给药方法的近期疗效、复发后生存时间及毒副作用。方法回顾性分析1997年1月至2004年12月期间我科用紫杉醇联合化疗的31例复发性卵巢上皮癌患者。紫杉醇周疗组14例紫杉醇60mg/m2静脉滴注每周1次,连续3周为1周期。月疗17例,紫杉醇135mg/m2静脉滴注3周1次为1周期。铂类等药用法两组相同顺铂70mg/m2,或卡铂300mg/m2或AUC=4~5,或奥沙利铂100mg/m2静脉滴注d2,均3周重复1次。结果全组31例病人均可进行近期疗效评价,总有效率为38.71%。周疗组和月疗组的有效率分别为42.86%(6/14)和35.29%(6/17)。随访的26例病例中,中位生存时间22个月。周疗组和月疗组中位生存时间分别是26.5个月、20个月。紫杉醇的毒副作用以白细胞下降、恶心呕吐、肌肉关节痛、手足麻木、脱发等常见。两组间毒副作用的发生率无明显差异,但周疗组毒副作用发生程度较低。结论紫杉醇无论对铂类敏感或对铂类耐药的复发卵巢上皮癌病例,均有较高的疗效,是复发卵巢癌的首选药物。紫杉醇周疗与月疗治疗复发卵巢上皮癌的近期疗效相近,而紫杉醇周疗在降低药物毒副作用、改善患者生存质量、延长生存时间方面比紫杉醇月疗更好。     

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as a single agent or as combination therapy with carboplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin （PLD; CAELYX ）, a novel formulation of doxorubicin with enhanced therapeutic efficacy and reduced toxicity, has demonstrated improved progression-free survival in recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer. The objective of this open-label, noncomparative, observational study was to determine the efficacy and safety of PLD monotherapy or combination therapy with carboplatin for patients with cancer. recurrent or refractory ovarian METHODS Sixty-two patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer who completed a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and demonstrated platinum sensitivity for first-line treatment at least 6 months prior to study entry were enrolled in 20 centers in China. PLD was given as monotherapy （50 mg/m2 infused over 60 minutes） or as combination therapy （30 mg/m2 1-hour infusion） with carboplatin （area under the curve 5 mg.min/mL 1-hour infusion） on day 1 every 28 days for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response （OR） rate or CA-125 level. Secondary endpoints included time to response, time-to-progression, health-related quality of life, and safety. RESULTS Overall, 48% of the 62 evaluable patients achieved a confirmed OR. More patients receiving PLD and carboplatin achieved an OR vs the PLD monotherapy group （63% vs. 37%）. The median time to response and disease progression was 58.5 days and 56.0 days, respectively. Overall and drug-related adverse events were reported for 39% and 34%, respectively. The most commonly reported adverse events were stomatitis （22.6%） and palmar-plantar erythroderma （9.7%）. Two deaths were reported. CONCLUSION PLD is an effective and well tolerated agent in women with recurrent or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.     

紫杉醇脂质体联合卡铂治疗晚期卵巢上皮癌的临床分析

目的研究紫杉醇脂质体联合卡铂方案化疗治疗晚期卵巢上皮癌的临床疗效和毒副作用。方法对经减瘤术后病理组织学确诊的Ⅲ一Ⅳ卵巢上皮癌患者26例,采用紫杉醇脂质体联合卡铂方案化疗,其中紫杉醇脂质体130～175mg／m^2第1天静脉滴注;卡铂300mg／m^2第2天静脉滴注,每21天为1个周期,每2个周期评价1次疗效。结果26例患者完全可以评价疗效,其中完全缓解7例,部分缓解11例,稳定6例,进展3例,总有效率为69．23％,其中Ⅲ期有效率为72．22％,Ⅳ期有效率为62．50％。中位疾病进展时间（MTYP）10个月（5～13个月）,无复发生存期5个月。毒副作用主要为骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应。结论紫杉醇脂质体联合卡铂方案治疗晚期卵巢上皮癌近期疗效好,毒副作用可以耐受,值得临床推广使用。     

Cost-minimisation analysis of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride versus topotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer in Spain

The study consisted of a cost-minimisation analysis since the findings from a multicentre randomised phase III trial showed that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride was at least as efficacious as topotecan. An economic model from the Spanish hospitals perspective was constructed to compare the costs derived from the treatment using both drugs in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who failed a first-line platinum-containing regimen. The cost evaluation included direct medical costs: drug, drug administration and costs of managing adverse events. Estimation of resources used in managing adverse events was made retrospectively through an expert panel. Results obtained per patient were: cost of drug and administration, 8647.70 euros for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and 8519.94 euros for topotecan, while cost of managing adverse events was 967.02 euros in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride arm and 3304.75 euros for topotecan. The total cost per patient was therefore estimated to be 9614.72 euros for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and 11 824.69 euros for topotecan, showing that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride produces a cost saving of 2209.97 euros per patient in comparison to topotecan. Sensitivity analyses verified the robustness of the results. These findings suggest that pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride is an efficient therapy and can be used as a cost-saving option for treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who have failed a first-line platinum-containing regimen.     

Intra- and postoperative catumaxomab in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: safety and two-year efficacy results from a multicentre,single-arm,phase II study

Background:

This is the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab administered i.p. at the end of cytoreductive surgery and postoperatively prior to standard chemotherapy in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods:

Patients received i.p. catumaxomab 10 μg intraoperatively and 10, 20, 50 and 150 μg on days 7, 10, 13 and 16, respectively, postoperatively. After the study, patients received standard chemotherapy and were followed for 23 months. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications.

Results:

Forty-one patients entered the study and were evaluable for safety and 34 were alive at 24 months. Complete tumour resection rate was 68%. Postoperative complications were observed in 51%, the most common anastomotic leakage (7%) and wound infections (5%). The most common catumaxomab-related adverse events were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and pyrexia. Thirty-nine percent discontinued catumaxomab therapy, and 98% received chemotherapy post study. Kaplan–Meier estimates of disease-free and overall survival after 24 months were 56% and 85%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Intra- and close postoperative catumaxomab seems feasible, but efficacy and safety were limited by postsurgical complications. In the future prospective trials are needed to investigate the best schedule of integration of catumaxomab into current treatment strategies for EOC.     

The role of bevacizumab in recurrent,platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

The majority of women with ovarian cancer will experience a recurrence of their disease despite aggressive primary cytoreduction and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy. Notwithstanding the high rate of recurrence, targeted and biologic agents have helped to decrease the dependence on cytotoxic chemotherapy. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, has been shown to cause regression in tumor vasculature, inhibition of angiogenesis and prevention of progenitor cell recruitment. Phase III clinical trials of bevacizumab in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer and in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer have shown an improvement in progression free survival without an appreciable difference in overall survival. The addition of bevacizumab to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens has demonstrated improved response rates, and improved progression free survival. These results have stimulated research in additional angiogenesis inhibitors and trials to further incorporate bevacizumab into the treatment schema for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.     

A pilot study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

Background Both gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) are antineoplastic drugs with clinical activity in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of biweekly scheduled gemcitabine and PLD combination therapy in such patients. Methods Eighteen women with ovarian cancer that had recurred within 6 months after standard carboplatin and paclitaxel therapy were eligible for enrollment. Gemcitabine 2000 mg/m² and PLD 20 mg/m² were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Results Hematological toxicity was mild. No severe (grade III/IV) leucopenia/neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was observed. Severe anemia was seen in only 3 (17%) patients. Several other severe nonhematological adverse effects were well tolerated and easily managed. The overall response rate was 28% (5 of 18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%–54%) with 2 (11%) complete and 3 (17%) partial responses. The median overall survival time was 17 months (range, 1 to 25 months). The median survival for patients with clinical benefit including disease response or stabilization was 17 months (range, 3 to 26 months) compared to that of patients with progressive disease, which was 2 months (range, 1 to 11 months; P = 0.04). Conclusion A biweekly schedule of gemcitabine combined with PLD is an active and safe chemotherapy regimen with acceptable and easily manageable toxicities in women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.