Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol.

PURPOSE: This phase II noncomparative randomized trial was conducted to determine the optimal sequencing and integration of paclitaxel/carboplatin with standard daily thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), in patients with locally advanced unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survival data were compared with historical standard sequential chemoradiotherapy data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresected stages IIIA and IIIB NSCLC, with Karnofsky performance status > or = 70% and weight loss < or = 10%, received two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUC] = 6) followed by TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 1, sequential) or two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6) followed by weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2) with concurrent TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 2, induction/concurrent), or weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2)/TRT (63.0 Gy) followed by two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6; arm 3, concurrent/consolidation). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 39.6 months, median overall survival was 13.0, 12.7, and 16.3 months for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. During induction chemotherapy, grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in 32% and 38% of patients on study arms 1 and 2, respectively. The most common locoregional grade 3/4 toxicity during and after TRT was esophagitis, which was more pronounced with the administration of concurrent chemoradiotherapy on study arms 2 and 3 (19% and 28%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and TRT followed by consolidation seems to be associated with the best outcome, although this schedule was associated with greater toxicity.     

Effect of amifostine on toxicities associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but can be limited by acute and late toxicities (esophagitis, pneumonitis, and myelosuppression). This trial investigated whether pretreatment with amifostine, a radioprotector, could reduce the incidence of radiochemotherapy-induced acute and late toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 1997 and August 1999, 73 patients with previously untreated Stage IIIa-IIIb NSCLC were randomized to treatment with RCT alone (n = 36) or RCT plus amifostine (300 mg/m(2) daily i.v. infusion, n = 37). RCT consisted of either paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) or carboplatin (AUC 2) once weekly during a 5- to 6-week course of conventional radiotherapy given as 2 Gy/5 days/week to a total dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Blood cell counts were measured weekly; esophagitis and acute lung toxicity were evaluated during the treatment course. Treatment efficacy was assessed following World Health Organization criteria for response. Late lung toxicity was assessed at 3 and 6 months after RCT and was graded from 0 to 4 according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were evaluable for toxicity analysis (RCT group, n = 32; RCT + amifostine, n = 36). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in patient baseline characteristics. The incidence of Grade >or=3 esophagitis during RCT was significantly lower for patients receiving amifostine than for patients receiving RCT alone (38.9% vs. 84.4%%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of Grade >or=3 acute pulmonary toxicity was significantly reduced in patients treated with RCT plus amifostine compared to patients who received RCT alone (19.4% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.002). At 3 months after RCT, patients treated with amifostine had a significantly lower incidence of pneumonitis than patients who received RCT alone (p = 0.009). Combined response rates (complete plus partial responses) were 82.2% in the RCT group and 88.8% in the RCT plus amifostine group (p = 0.498).Amifostine is effective in reducing the incidence of both acute and late toxicities associated with RCT in patients with locally advanced NSCLC without compromising antitumor efficacy.     

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by standard radiotherapy with concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin plus weekly paclitaxel for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

Both induction chemotherapy and concurrent platinating agents have been shown to improve results of thoracic irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II study investigated activity and feasibility of a novel chemoradiation regimen, including platinum and paclitaxel, both as induction chemotherapy and concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy. Previously untreated patients with histologically/cytologically proven unresectable stage I-III NSCLC were eligible. Induction chemotherapy consisted of 2 courses of 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and carboplatin at AUC of 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks. From day 43, continuous thoracic irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions radiotherapy for 6 weeks) was given concurrently with daily cisplatin at a dose of 5 mg/m2 intravenously and weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 45 mg/m2 for 6 weeks. Fifteen patients were accrued in the first stage of the trial. According to the previous statistical considerations, accrual at the second stage of the study was halted as a result of the achievement an insufficient number of successes. Major toxicity of combined chemoradiation was grade III-IV esophagitis requiring hospitalization for artificial nutrition, which occurred in 58% of patients. Other toxicities included grade II-IV fatigue in 75% of patients and grade I-IV neuromuscular toxicity in 67%. Only 7 patients completed the treatment program as scheduled. Eight patients (53.3%; 95% confidence interval, 26.5-78.7%) had a major response (5 partial response, 3 complete response), 2 patients had disease progression, and 1 was stable at the end of treatment. Four patients died early. With a median follow up of 38 months, the median survival was 12 months. A combined chemoradiation program, including platinum and paclitaxel, appears difficult to deliver at full dose as a result of toxicity, mainly esophagitis. More active and less toxic combined modality treatments need to be developed for inoperable NSCLC.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (a Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network Study)

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT) followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel during the concurrent phase of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC from the Vanderbilt Cancer Center and Affiliate Network (VCCAN) institutions were entered onto the study from June 1996 until May 1997. Weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)/l-hour) and weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) plus concurrent hyperfractionated chest RT (1.2 Gy/BID/69.6 Gy) were delivered for 6 weeks followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. Three patients achieved a complete response (7.2%) and 30 patients achieved a partial response (71.4%), for an overall response rate of 78.6% [95% C.I. (66.2%-91.0%)]. The 1- and 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates of all 43 patients were 61.6% and 35% respectively, with a median survival time of 14.3 months. The median follow-up time was 14 months. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (26%). There was an incidence of 7% grade 3 and 9.5% grade 4 pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, plus concurrent hyperfractionated RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The response rate from this regimen is encouraging and appears to be at least equivalent to the more toxic chemoradiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT in a phase III study.     

Phase I/II study of concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly cisplatin with radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

The optimal chemoradiation regimen for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been determined. In this phase I/II study, the use of twice-weekly paclitaxel concomitant with weekly cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated. Patients with stage III NSCLC (without pleural effusion or cervical lymphadenopathy) were treated with thoracic RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with concurrent weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of twice-weekly paclitaxel (starting dose of paclitaxel of 20 mg/m(2) increased in increments of 5 mg/m(2)) in successive cohorts of three to six patients until two or more patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) at a particular dose level. All patients were planned to be given a further two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5 after completion of RT. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study from two institutions. At a dose of paclitaxel 35 mg/m(2), two of four treated patients had DLTs (1 grade 3 oesophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 1 grade 3 oesophagitis and infection). The recommended dose was therefore determined to be 30 mg/m(2) and a total of 15 patients were enrolled in an expanded cohort at this level. The overall response rate for all patients was 64% (95% CI: 43-82%). The estimated median survival was 23.6 months with an estimated 1-year and 2-year survival of 72 and 49%, respectively. Paclitaxel can be safely given twice-weekly at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) in combination with weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) and thoracic RT (60 Gy), and this regimen has significant activity in stage III NSCLC.     

Phase III randomised trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cooperative multinational trial.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin has significant activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study of chemotherapy-na?ve advanced NSCLC patients was designed to assess whether response rate in patients receiving a paclitaxel/carboplatin combination was similar to that in patients receiving a paclitaxel/cisplatin combination. Paclitaxel was given at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) (3-h intravenous infusion) followed by either carboplatin at an AUC of 6 or cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m(2), all repeated every 3 weeks. Survival, toxicity and quality of life were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive one of the two combinations, stratified according to centre, performance status, disease stage and histology. The primary analyses of response rate and survival were carried out on response-evaluable patients. Survival was also analysed for all randomised patients. Toxicity analyses were carried out on all treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients were randomised. The two treatment arms were well balanced with regard to gender (83% male), age (median 58 years), performance status (83% ECOG 0-1), stage (68% IV, 32% IIIB) and histology (38% squamous cell carcinoma). In the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, 306 patients received a total of 1311 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses) while in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, 302 patients received a total of 1321 courses (median four courses, range 1-10 courses). In only 76% of courses, carboplatin was administered as planned at an AUC of 6, while in 96% of courses, cisplatin was given at the planned dose of 80 mg/m(2). The response rate was 25% (70 of 279) in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 28% (80 of 284) in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (P = 0.45). Responses were reviewed by an independent radiological committee. For all randomised patients, median survival was 8.5 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm [hazard ratio 1.20, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]; the 1-year survival rates were 33% and 38%, respectively. On the same dataset, a survival update after 22 months of additional follow-up yielded a median survival of 8.2 months in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm and 9.8 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 1.06-1.40; P = 0.019); the 2-year survival rates were 9% and 15%, respectively. Excluding neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/carboplatin arm, and nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity, which were more frequent in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, the rate of severe toxicities was generally low and comparable between the two arms. Overall quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13) was also similar between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial comparing carboplatin and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Although paclitaxel/carboplatin yielded a similar response rate, the significantly longer median survival obtained with paclitaxel/cisplatin indicates that cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be the first treatment option.     

Twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel consolidation for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the efficacy of paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In view of those results, we sought to examine the safety and efficacy of administration of radiosensitizing paclitaxel twice weekly and carboplatin weekly with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (XRT) followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin for stage III NSCLC in a multi-institutional phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Induction chemoradiotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 30 mg/m2 delivered intravenously (IV) for 1 hour twice weekly for 6 weeks, carboplatin at a dose based on an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 1.5 mg/mL x min, given IV once weekly for 6 weeks, and concomitant XRT of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy daily for a total of 61 Gy. Patients who achieved a complete response, partial response, or stable disease received two 21-day cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV for 3 hours and carboplatin at a dose based on an AUC of 6 mg/mL x min. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were eligible. Their median age was 62 years (range, 39 to 73 years), 59% were female, 41% were male, 94% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 38% had stage IIIA NSCLC, and 62% had stage IIIB NSCLC. Common grade III and IV toxicities during the induction chemoradiation phase included esophagitis (38%) and neutropenia (12%). The most common adverse reaction during consolidation chemotherapy was grade III neutropenia in five patients (15%). The overall response rate was 71%, which was achieved in the induction phase. The median follow-up was 20 months, the median survival was 17 months, and 2-year actuarial survival rate was 40% (95% confidence interval, 20% to 65%). CONCLUSION: This regimen is tolerable and results are promising. We recommend further evaluation of this regimen in a phase III trial.     

三维适形放疗联合诱导化疗和紫杉醇同期化疗不能手术Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析

目的 观察诱导化疗和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)联合每周紫杉醇治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及毒性.方法 56例不能手术的Ⅲ期NSCLC患者予紫杉醇(175 mg/m2第1天)加卡铂(AUC=5～6第1天)诱导化疗2～4个疗程,化疗后3～4周内开始3DCRT,剂量在满足V20≤31%,脊髓≤50 Gy的条件下给予尽可能高(平均60.75 Gy),联合每周紫杉醇40 mg/m2同期化疗.结果 同期放化疗期间,3例因3+4级放射性肺炎,1例因3级心脏毒性终止治疗,2例因身体虚弱分别中断治疗7、12 d,其余均按计划完成治疗.白细胞下降发生率为58.9%(1例为3级,余为1、2级),3级淋巴细胞下降发生率达75.O%.主要急性毒性为放射性食管炎和放射性肺炎,≥2级发生率分别为38%和25%.放射性食管炎3级3例,放射性肺炎3级2例,4级1例.2、3、4级晚期食管损伤各1例,肺纤维化2级9例.肺原发灶总有效率为69.7%.1年生存率分别为72.3%,1年局部无进展生存率为62.7%.局部复发率为32.1%,远处转移率为39.3%,远处转移与局部复发仍是死亡的主要原因.结论 诱导化疗后3DCRT结合每周紫杉醇治疗局部晚期NSCLC耐受性较好,近期疗效好,远期疗效有待继续观察.     

Induction carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified Phase I trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III, unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). In addition, dose escalation of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was performed. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)/3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x6) carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) was initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts. RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 52%. Three patients (10%) experienced disease progression during the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, with 18% of patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 esophagitis. The overall response rate was 70% (1 complete response and 18 partial responses). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 69% and 45%, with a median survival of 21 months. The 1-year progression free survival probability was 41% (95% confidence interval, 23-59%). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of 3DCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Accrual is continuing in a Phase II fashion at 74 Gy with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel.     

Phase III trial comparing a defined duration of therapy versus continuous therapy followed by second-line therapy in advanced-stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare four cycles of therapy versus continuous therapy to determine the optimal duration of chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were randomized to arm A (four cycles of carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) every 21 days) or arm B (continuous treatment with carboplatin/paclitaxel until progression). At progression, all patients on both arms were to receive second-line weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2)/wk. The primary end points were survival and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients were randomized. Fifty-seven percent of arm A patients completed four courses of therapy. In the 116 arm B patients, the median number of cycles delivered was four (range, zero to 19 cycles). Forty-two percent received five or more cycles; 18% received eight or more cycles. Overall response rates were 22% and 24% for arms A and B, respectively (P =.80). Median survival time and 1-year survival rates were 6.6 months and 28% for arm A and 8.5 months and 34% for arm B, respectively (log-rank P =.63). Rates of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were similar between the two arms, except for neuropathy. The rate of grade 2 to 4 neuropathy increased from 19.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6% to 26.2%) at cycle 4 to 43% (95% CI, 28.6% to 57.4%) at cycle 8. There were no differences in QOL. Only 45% of patients received second-line therapy (42% in arm A v 47% in arm B, P =.42). CONCLUSION: This study shows no overall benefit in survival, response rates, or QOL to continuing treatment with carboplatin/paclitaxel beyond four cycles in advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation: radiation therapy oncology group trial 98-01.

PURPOSE: To test the ability of the cytoprotectant, amifostine, to reduce chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis and evaluate its influence on quality of life (QOL) and swallowing symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with stage II to IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer received induction paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) days 1 and 22 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) days 1 and 22, followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) IV) and carboplatin (AUC 2), and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid). Patients were randomly assigned at registration to amifostine (AM) 500 mg IV four times per week or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. Beyond standard toxicity end points, physician dysphagia logs (PDLs), daily patient swallowing diaries, and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC-13) were also collected. Swallowing AUC analyses were calculated from patient diaries and PDLs. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive AM, and 122, to receive no AM (one patient was ineligible); 72% received AM per protocol or with a minor deviation. AM was associated with higher rates of acute nausea (P = .03), vomiting (P = .007), cardiovascular toxicity (P = .0001), and infection or febrile neutropenia (P = .03). The rate of >/= grade 3 esophagitis was 30% with AM versus 34% without AM (P = .9). Patient diaries demonstrated lower swallowing dysfunction AUC with amifostine (z test P = .025). QOL was not significantly different between the two arms, except for pain, which showed more clinically meaningful improvement and less deterioration at 6 weeks follow-up (v pretreatment) in the AM arm (P = .003). The median survival rates for both arms were comparable (AM, 17.3 v no AM, 17.9 months; P = .87). CONCLUSION: AM did not significantly reduce esophagitis >/= grade 3 in patients receiving hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy. However, patient self-assessments suggested a possible advantage to AM that is being explored with modified dosing route strategies.     

A randomized phase II trial comparing every 3-weeks carboplatin/paclitaxel with every 3-weeks carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal schedule of taxane administration has been an area of active interest in several recent clinical trials. METHODS: To address a pure schedule question, we randomized 161 patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to either paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 every 3 weeks x 4 cycles or 75 mg/m2/week x 12 (cumulative dose on each arm = 900 mg/m2). Both arms received concurrent carboplatin AUC 6 every 3 weeks x 4 cycles. RESULTS: The two arms were well-balanced in terms of known prognostic factors. The overall response rate and survival outcomes were similar on the two arms. There was significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2-4 anemia on the weekly arm but less severe myalgias/arthralgias and alopecia. No difference in the rates of peripheral neuropathy was observed; however, patients on the every 3 weeks arm reported significantly more taxane therapy-related side-effects on the functional assessment of cancer therapy taxane subscale. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial exploring schedule-related issues with carboplatin/paclitaxel confirms the versatility of this regimen.     

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy with Chemotherapy for Completely Resected Unsuspected N2-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionWe investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) would increase survival in patients with completely resected unsuspected N2-positive NSCLC versus in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy alone.MethodsEligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the CCRT arm or the chemotherapy arm. In the CCRT arm, patients received concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) with five cycles of weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²), followed by two additional cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m²) at 3-week intervals. In the chemotherapy arm, patients received four cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 5.5) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was disease-free survival.ResultsWe enrolled and analyzed 101 patients (51 received CCRT and 50 received chemotherapy). In all, 74 and 27 patients were preoperatively staged as N0 and N1 diseases, respectively. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. The median disease-free survival of the CCRT arm was 24.7 months, which was not significantly different from that of the chemotherapy arm (21.9 months) (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confident interval: 0.58–1.52, p = 0.40). There was no difference in overall survival (74.3 months in CCRT arm and 83.5 months in the chemotherapy arm) (hazard ratio = 1.33, 95% confident interval: 0.71–2.49).ConclusionsThere was no survival benefit from adjuvant CCRT compared with from platinum-based chemotherapy alone for completely resected unsuspected N2-positive NSCLC. However, the role of sequential radiotherapy administered after adjuvant chemotherapy is being evaluated, and further study is needed to evaluate the optimal radiotherapy approach for completely resected N2-positive NSCLC.     

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of amifostine as cytoprotectant in first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: A phase III multicenter randomized trial has been designed in order to address whether amifostine (WR-2721, Ethyol), an organic thiophosphate cytoprotector, can protect ovarian cancer patients from toxicity induced by carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg.min/ml] and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) with (arm A) or without (arm B) amifostine (910 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighty-seven patients were accrued: 93 patients in arm A and 94 patients in arm B. There was no difference in terms of erythrocytopenia between the two arms; grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was higher in arm A (3.3% versus 0.6%; P = 0.0010). There was no significant reduction of grade 3-4 leukopenia in arm A (11.8% versus 13.8%). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower in arm A (31.3% versus 37.9%; P = 0.03), as was the incidence of severe mucositis (4.7% versus 15.4% in arm A versus arm B, respectively; P <0.0001). Finally, amifostine appears to be protective against neurotoxicity (grade 3-4 neurotoxicity 3.7% versus 7.2%; P = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 2-41), time to progression was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that amifostine can exert some protection from the cumulative toxicity associated with this regimen. The results need to be confirmed in other randomized trials with this combination.     

Multicenter randomized trial for stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer using every-3-week versus weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin

PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel with carboplatin is effective in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase III study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a weekly versus an every-3-week schedule in the first-line treatment of advanced-stage NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 2 once weekly for 6-8 weeks (arm A) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 on day 1 every 21 days (arm B). RESULTS: A total of 883 patients received >or= 1 chemotherapy cycle and were included in the results. The objective response rates observed (complete response plus partial response) were 38% for arm A and 33% for arm B. Median times to progression and median survival times were 6.1 months and 8.9 months in arm A and 7.2 months and 9.5 months in arm B, respectively. There were no significant differences between treatment arms. The chemotherapy was well tolerated in both schedules. However, grade 3/4 sensory neuropathy occurred more frequently with the every-3-week schedule (9.1% vs. 4.4%), whereas grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred more frequently with the weekly schedule (4.2% vs. 1.1%). CONCLUSION: In terms of response and survival, paclitaxel/carboplatin administered once weekly is comparable with the every-3-week schedule. Toxicity differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate schedule for the individual.     

Dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy with induction and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I/II trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The dose of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was increased. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC], 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x 6) carboplatin (AUC, 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) were initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts (60, 66, 70, and 74 Gy). RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 40%. Eight patients (13%) progressed on the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, however, only 8% developed Grade 3/4 esophagitis using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The overall response rate was 52%. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 71%, 52%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, with a median survival of 26 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression free survival probabilities were 47%, 35%, and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of TCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Both locoregional and distant failure remain problematic in this population of patients.     

Carboplatin combined with amifostine, a bone marrow protectant, in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised phase II study.

Amifostine (WR-2721), a thiol compound, has been shown to protect normal tissue from alkylating agents and cisplatin-induced toxicity without loss of anti-tumour effects. To confirm this result, we conducted a phase II randomised trial to determine if the addition of amifostine reduces the toxicity of carboplatin without loss of anti-tumour activity in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). After the first course of carboplatin (600 mg m-2 i.v. infusion), 21 patients were randomised to receive three cycles of carboplatin alone (C arm) or three infusions of amifostine at 910 mg m-2 (CA arm) at 28 day intervals. The amifostine was given 20 min before and at 2 and 4 h after carboplatin. Since the 910 mg m-2 amifostine infusion led to hypotension in six patients, the dosage was reduced by 25%, to 683 mg m-2 t.i.d., in the other four patients. Amifostine was well tolerated at this dose level. Five patients in the CA arm and three in the C arm had their planned treatment discontinued owing to progressive disease (n = 3), amifostine side-effects (hypotension, sneezing and sickness, n = 4), and carboplatin-induced thrombocytopenia (n = 1). Bone marrow and renal function at study entry and after the first course of carboplatin before randomisation were similar in both treatment arms. Twenty courses of carboplatin+amifostine have been compared with 25 courses of carboplatin alone. Although there was no statistically significant difference with respect to haematological values comparing both arms, the median time to platelet recovery (> 100 x 10(9) l-1) (13.5 days vs 21 days; P = 0.04) and the need for hospitalisation for i.v. antibiotic and other supportive treatment tended to be reduced in the CA arm (0/20 vs 6/25 patient courses; P = 0.06). Response rates and median survival (14 vs 9 months) were no different, excluding tumour protection activity by amifostine. These results with a small number of patients suggest that amifostine given with carboplatin may reduce the duration of thrombocytopenia and hospitalisation.     

Three-arm randomized study of two cisplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group--EORTC 08975.

PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel plus cisplatin (arm A) versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B) and arm A versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (arm C) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) both combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) combined with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8). Primary end point was comparison of overall survival for B versus A and C versus A. Secondary end points included response rate and duration, progression-free survival, toxicities, quality of life [QoL], and cost of treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty patients (arm A, 159; arm B, 160; arm C, 161 patients) were enrolled; all baseline characteristics were balanced. Median survival times were as follows: arm A, 8.1 months; arm B, 8.9 months; arm C, 6.7 months. Response rates were 31.8% for arm A, 36.6% for arm B, and 27.7% for arm C. Other than myelosuppression (B v A, P <.005), no statistically or clinically significant differences were observed for secondary end points. The average treatment costs were 25% higher in arm C as compared with arms A and B. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine do not increase overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC as compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin. Treatment was well tolerated, and most QoL parameters were similar, but costs associated with the nonplatinum arm were highest.     

Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of three regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin as initial therapy and the feasibility of subsequent maintenance therapy versus observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one patients were randomly assigned to one of the following arms: arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) on day 1; arm 2, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; or arm 3, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 cycle 1 and 100 mg/m2 cycle 2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. Patients who responded (n = 130) at week 16 were randomly assigned to either weekly paclitaxel therapy (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks; n = 65) or observation (n = 65). RESULTS: For the 390 assessable patients, the objective response rates observed with initial therapy were 32% for arm 1, 24% for arm 2, and 18% for arm 3. The median time to progression and median survival times were 30 and 49 weeks for arm 1, 21 and 31 weeks for arm 2, and 27 and 40 weeks for arm 3, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 47% for arm 1, 31% for arm 2, and 41% for arm 3. CONCLUSION: Arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (AUC = 6) administered on day 1, demonstrates the most favorable therapeutic index in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

周剂量紫杉醇同步放疗治疗老年食管癌的临床观察

[摘要]目的观察周剂量紫杉醇同步放疗治疗老年食管癌的近期疗效和安全性。方法86例老年食管癌患者随机分为2组,周剂量紫杉醇同步放疗组（同步组）44例,单纯放疗组（单放组）42例。同步组：紫杉醇75mg·m-2,d1,8,15放疗采用常规分割,照射剂量60～66Gy;单放组：仅接受放疗,方法与同步组相同。结果同步组有效率93．2％,高于单放组的66．7％,比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。2组主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制、神经毒性、放射性食管炎等,其中同步组Ⅱ-Ⅳ度白细胞减少发生率明显高于单放组（P〈0．05）。结论周剂量紫杉醇同步放疗治疗老年食管癌近期疗效好,毒副反应可耐受。