Adhesive systems and secondary caries formation: Assessment of dentin bond strength, caries lesions depth and fluoride release.

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated the microtensile bond strength and caries formation on adhesive/dentin interfaces before and after dynamic chemical formation of secondary caries. METHODS: Restorations were prepared on the dentin surface of 80 bovine incisors using four adhesive systems: two fluoride-free (Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond) and two fluoride containing (Optibond Solo Plus and Clearfil Protect Bond). The restored teeth were then sectioned into multiple slabs that were further trimmed at the bonded interface to a cross-sectional area of 1 mm2. Half of the slabs were subjected to secondary caries formation using a pH cycling model (treated groups); while the other half was used as the control group (no pH cycling). The specimens designated for bond strength evaluation were subjected to microtensile bond strength test (muTBS). Caries lesions formation was assesses by polarized light microscopy at different depths from the adhesive-dentin bonded interface. The fluoride ion concentration was evaluated using the de/remineralization solutions (De/Re). RESULTS: No differences in muTBS were observed among the adhesive systems in both the control and treated conditions. Secondary caries significantly reduced the values of muTBS for all adhesives (p<0.05). Optibond Solo Plus presented the lowest caries formation at 5 microm depth. Fluoride concentrations present in the De/Re were less than 0.03 ppm, regardless of the adhesive system tested. SIGNIFICANCE: Bond strength values significantly decreased after in vitro secondary caries formation. Fluoride present in adhesive systems is not capable of inhibiting secondary caries or maintaining bond strength values following caries formation.     

Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties of the cured adhesive resins. METHODS: Coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human teeth were treated with four commercial self-etching priming systems (Clearfil SE Bond; UniFil Bond; Tokuso Mac-Bond II; and Imperva Fluoro Bond) and bonded with a resin composite. After 24h storage in water at 37 degrees C, the bonded specimens were trimmed and subjected to micro-tensile bond strength testing at a cross-head speed of 1mm/min. Debonded surfaces were observed under a FE-SEM. For testing mechanical properties, 0.7-mm thick slabs of each adhesive resin were prepared, light-cured, and stored dry at the room temperature for 24h. After trimming, ultimate micro-tensile strength was measured. The nano-hardness and Young's modulus were also evaluated using cured adhesives that were prepared in the same manner as described above. RESULTS: The micro-tensile bond strengths to dentin and ultimate micro-tensile strengths of the resins were not significantly different among all systems (P>0.05). However, the nano-hardness and Young's modulus of Clearfil SE Bond and Imperva Fluoro Bond adhesive resins were significantly higher than those of UniFil Bond and Tokuso Mac-Bond II resins (P<0.05). The micro-tensile bond strength significantly correlated with the ultimate micro-tensile strength of the resins (r(2)=0.77; P<0.05), but was not correlated with the nano-hardness or Young's modulus (P>0.05). SEM observation of the debonded surfaces revealed a mixed type of fracture with a combination of interfacial and cohesive failure within the adhesive resin. SIGNIFICANCE: The four self-etching priming systems exhibited similar dentin bond strengths, which also correlates with the ultimate strength of the adhesive resins.     

Micro-tensile bond strength of self-etching primer adhesive systems to human coronal carious dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-tensile bond strengths of three self-etching primer adhesive systems to normal dentin (ND), caries-affected dentin (CAD) and caries-infected dentin (CID). Human extracted molars with caries were used, and flat dentin surfaces ground by 600-grit SiC paper were prepared. The surfaces were dyed using Caries-Detector solution, treated with Clearfil SE Bond, Mac-Bond II and UniFil Bond, and then covered with resin composites according to manufacturer's instructions. After immersion in 37 degrees C water for 24 h, the teeth were serially sectioned into multiple slices. Each slice was distinguished into ND, CAD and CID groups by the degree of staining, and the bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observation was also performed. For statistical analysis, anova and Scheffe's test were used (P < 0.05). The bond strengths of the three adhesive systems to CAD and CID were significantly lower than those to ND. There was significant difference in the bond strength to ND between Clearfil SE Bond and UniFil Bond, but no significant differences to CAD and CID among the three adhesive systems. On SEM, the hybrid layers in CAD and CID showed more porous structures compared with ND. The results indicated that the bond strengths to CAD and CID were not affected by a variety of self-etching primer adhesive systems because of the porous hybrid layer formation in carious dentin.     

Adhesion to Er:YAG laser and bur prepared root and crown dentine

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strengths between dentine and resin composite obtained after Er:YAG laser treatment of crown or root dentine used together with self‐etch and total‐etch adhesive systems. Methods: One etch‐and‐rinse adhesive (Single Bond, 3M, USA) and one self‐etch system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Japan) were applied to root and crown dentine prepared with a regular bur in a turbine or with an Er:YAG laser. The shear bond strength was determined after thermocycling and statistically analysed using independent t‐tests. Results: Crown sites bonded using Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond adhesives yielded bond strengths similar to that of root dentine sites (p > 0.05). Clearfil SE Bond was stronger in both the lased and non‐lased groups (p < 0.05). The lowest bond strength was obtained when Single Bond without acid etching was used on Er:YAG ablated dentine. When total‐etch adhesive was used, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the laser‐ablated and laser‐ablated/acid‐etched and bur‐cut/acid‐etched groups. Conclusions: Er:YAG laser irradiation of root and crown dentine conducted prior to the adhesive protocol adversely affected adhesion and decreased bond strength compared with traditional preparation.     

An in vitro study on the adhesion of quartz fiber posts to radicular dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro the bond strength at the adhesive interface between a quartz fiber post, different adhesive systems, and different composite cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into three groups (n=10). Quartz fiber posts (DT Light-Post) were cemented with the following materials: group I: Prime & Bond NT + Self Cure Activator, and Calibra as luting cement; group II: Prime & Bond NT + Self Cure Activator, and UniFil Core; group III: UniFil Bond in combination with Unifil Core. The specimens were processed for the push-out test to evaluate bond strength at the root dentin-cement-post interface. They were sectioned along the long axis of the post into 1-mm-thick slices. A total of 60 sections was obtained from group I. Group II provided 67 slices, while group III provided 69. Loading was performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until the post segment was dislodged from the root section. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the three experimental groups. The mean bond strength obtained for group I was 9.81 +/- 5.40 MPa. For group II it was 12.06 +/- 6.25 MPa, and 9.80 +/- 5.01 MPa for group III. CONCLUSION: All the materials tested were similar in terms of providing satisfactory bond strength when used for luting fiber posts. However, Unifil Core may be advantageous since it can also be used as a core buildup material, which simplifies the clinical procedures.     

Effect of fluoride application on tensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to demineralized dentin

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It has been reported that the bond strength of composite to demineralized dentin is lower than that to sound dentin. This can be a problem in the success of so-called sealed restorations. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fluoride application on the tensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to demineralized dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty extracted bovine incisors were ground flat with 600-grit silicone carbide paper. Ninety teeth were then immersed in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) to form demineralized dentin. These teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 30 each: surfaces treated with fluoride solution (Group NF), surfaces treated with fluoride solution followed by a water rinse (Group RF), and control surfaces with no pretreatment (Group C). The remaining 30 teeth comprised a group with normal dentin surfaces (Group S). Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups of 10 each to test the bond strength test of Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, and Mac-Bond II. Tensile bond strengths (in MPa) were measured with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Mean bond strengths were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD (P =.05). SEM observations of the surfaces before and after priming and at resin-dentin interfaces in each group were performed. Elemental analysis of the dentin surfaces before priming was also carried out. RESULTS: The bond strengths of the adhesives to demineralized dentin in Groups NF, RF, and C were significantly lower than that of the normal dentin in Group S (P <.05). The mean bond strengths of the 3 adhesives in Group NF were higher than those in Groups RF and C, but a significant difference was observed only when Clearfil SE Bond was used (P <.05). In SEM images the open dentinal tubules on the surface and the resin tag formation at the resin-dentin interface were apparent in Group NF but were not observed in Groups RF and C. On elemental analysis, considerable amounts of fluoride and calcium were detected in the surfaces of Group NF. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the surface treatment with fluoride solution supported the resin tag formation at the resin-dentin interface and slightly improved the bond strength of the self-etching adhesive systems tested to demineralized dentin. This result indicated that the fluoride treatment to demineralized dentin might contribute to the success of the sealed restoration.     

Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite,compomer and glass ionomer cement

Background: To assess in vitro the dentine bond strength and microleakage of three Class V restorations viz. flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Methods: Eighteen dentine specimens were prepared and randomly distributed among three groups. Three kinds of restoration materials were each bonded on prepared dentine surfaces in three groups as per the manufacturers’ instructions. Group Aelite: Tyrian SPE (a no‐rinse, self‐priming etchant) + One Step Plus (an universal dental adhesive) + Aeliteflo (a flowable composite); Group Dyract: Prime & Bond NT (a no‐rinse, self‐priming dental adhesive) + Dyract AP (a compomer); Group GlasIonomer: GlasIonomer Type II (a self‐cured restorative glass ionomer). Fifteen dentine/restoration microtensile bond test specimens were prepared from each group and were subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. The bond interfaces were observed morphologically using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Twenty‐four cervical cavities of 4.0 mm mesiodistal length, 2.0 mm occlusogingival height and 1.5 mm depth were prepared at the cemento‐enamel junction (CEJ) on both buccal and lingual surfaces of each tooth. The cavities were each filled with flowable composite (Group Aelite), compomer (Group Dyract) and glass ionomer cement (Group GlasIonomer) using the same material and methods as for the microtensile bond tests. Microleakage of each restoration was evaluated by the ratio of the length of methylene blue penetration along the tooth‐restoration interface and the total length of the dentine cavity wall on the cut surface. Results: One‐way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD) tests revealed statistically significant differences among the dentine bond strength for Group Aelite (28.4 MPa), Group Dyract (15.1 MPa) and Group GlasIonomer (2.5 MPa). SEM images showed intimate adaptation in the restoration/dentine interfaces of Group Aelite and Group Dyract. All of the systems tested in this study presented microleakage. However, both Group Aelite (0.808) and Group Dyract (0.863) had significantly less microleakage than Group GlasIonomer (0.964). There were no statistically significant microleakage differences between Group Aelite and Group Dyract, and no statistically significant microleakage differences between the occlusal margin and gingival margin. Conclusions: None of the systems tested in this study completely eliminated microleakage. However, both the flowable composite and compomer provided stronger dentine bond strengths and better margin sealing than the conventional glass ionomer cement. Occlusal forces exerted the same effects on microleakage of the occlusal margin and gingival margin in cervical cavities.     

Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode

This aim of this study was to compare universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode. Three universal adhesives – Clearfil Universal, G‐Premio Bond, and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive – and three‐two‐step self‐etch adhesives – Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil SE Bond 2, and OptiBond XTR – were used. The initial shear bond strength and shear fatigue strength of resin composite bonded to adhesive on dentin in self‐etch mode were determined. Scanning electron microscopy observations of fracture surfaces after bond strength tests were also made. The initial shear bond strength of universal adhesives was material dependent, unlike that of two‐step self‐etch adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive was not significantly different from that of two‐step self‐etch adhesives, unlike the other universal adhesives. The shear fatigue strength of universal adhesives differed depending on the type of adhesive, unlike those of two‐step self‐etch adhesives. The results of this study encourage the continued use of two‐step self‐etch adhesive over some universal adhesives but suggest that changes to the composition of universal adhesives may lead to a dentin bond fatigue durability similar to that of two‐step self‐etch adhesives.     

Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that formation of inhibition zones by bonded restorations in artificially-induced carious dentin lesions is related to the permeability of the self-etch adhesives. METHODS: Fluid conductance of four single-step self-etch adhesives (Prompt L-Pop, Etch&Prime 3.0, One-Up Bond F and Reactmer Bond), and a control two-step self-etch adhesive (UniFil Bond) were measured after sound dentin surfaces were:(1) acid-etched; (2) polished to produce smear layers; (3) bonded with the adhesive; each at 20 cm hydrostatic pressure (hp). Osmotic fluid conductance was also determined for the bonded dentin after immersion in 4.8 M CaCl2 at 0 cm hp. For artificial caries inhibition, a non-fluoride releasing (NFR) two-step self-etch adhesive (UniFil Bond) and a fluoride-releasing (FR) single-step adhesive (Reactmer Bond) were used in combination with a NFR composite (Metafil CX) or a FR restorative material (Reactmer Paste). Artificial caries were induced in these restorations, from which 120 +/- 10 microm thick sections and the effect of caries inhibition were quantitatively assessed with polarizing light microscopy and image analysis. RESULTS: Fluid conductance after bonding with the single-step adhesives Prompt L-Pop and Etch&Prime 3.0 were not significantly different from those recorded from smear layer-covered dentin. Although better seals were achieved with One-Up Bond F and Reactmer Bond, fluid conductance at 20 cm hp was significantly higher than the two-step self-etch adhesive UniFil Bond. Osmotic conductance at 0 cm hp were not significantly different from normal fluid conductance at 20 cm hp. The sizes of artificial carious lesions in UniFil Bond were significantly higher irrespective of whether a FR or NFR composite was used. Significant reduction in lesion size occurred in Reactmer Bond with the use of a NFR composite, and even more so with the use of a FR composite.     

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two-step adhesive systems on secondary caries inhibition around fluoride-releasing materials in vitro. METHODS: Two self-etching primer systems, Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and UniFil Bond (UB), and two one-bottle systems with a total-etch wet-bonding technique, Single Bond (SB) and One-Step (OS), were used prior to placement of resin composites either with (Reactmer) or without (Z100) fluoride release. Class V cavities prepared in extracted human premolars were restored with various combinations of materials: Reactmer/SE, Reactmer/UB, Reactmer/SB, Reactmer/OS, Z100/SE, Z100/UB, Z100/SB and Z100/OS. After storage for 14 days, the restored teeth were incubated in bacterial medium containing sucrose with Streptoccus mutans for 2 weeks. Water sorption and desorption of the adhesives and fluoride release from the resins either coated with adhesive or uncoated were also determined. RESULTS: The one-bottle groups showed higher water sorption and desorption than the self-etching primer groups. Although fluoride release from the Reactmer specimens was suppressed by the adhesive coating, the one-bottle groups allowed significantly higher fluoride release than the self-etching primer groups. On microradiographs, the radio-opaque layers adjacent to the Reactmer restorations were thick and clear, while the layers adjacent to the Z100 restorations were thin and unclear. For the Reactmer restorations, the radio-opaque layers associated with the one-bottle groups were significantly thicker than for the self-etching primer groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the use of one-bottle wet-bonding systems for bonding of fluoride-releasing resin composites to dentine may contribute to inhibit secondary caries compared to self-etching primer systems.     

Effect of ethanol application on post-luting to intraradicular dentine

Aim  To examine the effect of the application of an ethanol rinse before luting fibre posts to intraradicular dentine with etch-and-rinse adhesive systems by means of push-out bond strength evaluation and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis.
Methodology  Fibre posts were luted to single-canal premolars using Dual Link as a luting agent in combination with a three-step (All Bond 2) or a two-step (One Step Plus) etch-and-rinse adhesive system, which were applied as per manufacturers' instructions (control) or with the additional rinse of ethanol on acid-etched dentine prior to the bonding procedures (experimental). Bonded specimens were sectioned into 1-mm-thick slabs and subjected to push-out bond strength testing. In addition, specimens from each group were processed for SEM analysis. Data were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis followed by Dunn's post hoc test at P  = 0.05.
Results  Push-out bond strength of All Bond 2 was significantly increased if the adhesive was applied on ethanol-saturated dentine ( P  < 0.05), whilst no significant difference ( P  > 0.05) was detected amongst experimental and control groups for One Step Plus. Irrespective of the adhesive, the SEM analysis revealed good impregnation patterns when both bonding techniques were employed.
Conclusions  The use of the additional ethanol rinse on acid-etched dentine revealed higher bond strength of All Bond 2 when compared with the control application procedure, used in combination with a resin-based cement to lute fibre posts into the dowel space. However, no bond strength improvements were detected using One Step Plus. Further investigations are needed to develop a clinically applicable ethanol/bonding/luting technique.     

Gap measurement and bond strength of five selected adhesive systems bonded to tooth structure

The ability of a restorative material to bond and seal the interface with tooth structure is perhaps the most significant factor in determining resistance to marginal caries. Thus, the quality and durability of marginal seal and bond strength are major considerations in the selection of restorative materials. The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength and marginal discrepancies of five adhesive systems: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond, KB 200, ProBond and AELITE Bond. Twenty-five buccal and 25 lingual cavities were prepared in 25 caries-free extracted molar teeth, giving 10 cavities for each of the 5 adhesive systems. All teeth were restored with the resin composite Pertac Hybrid, or PRISMA Total Performance Hybrid with their appropriate adhesive systems. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled, were stained with a 1.5% aqueous solution of a procion dye (reactive orange 14) and sectioned coronally with a saw microtome. Three sections of 200 μm thickness were prepared from each restoration which were then examined microscopically to measure marginal gap widths using a confocal tandem microscope. Shear bond strength measurements were carried out on the dentine bond using a universal testing machine. The All-Bond 2 adhesive system was found to have higher shear bond strength and to have the least gap with at the cementodentinal margin.     

Tensile bond strength of different adhesive systems between bone and composite compared: an in vitro study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to compare tensile bond strength of three dentine adhesive systems (Excite, Clearfil New Bond, Etch & Prime 3.0) and two cyanoacrylate adhesives (Cyano Veneer, Histoacryl) to animal bone in vitro. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens from five porcine mandibles (diameter 9 mm) with a total thickness of 4mm (+/-0.5mm) and a cortical layer of 1.5mm (+/-0.2mm) were prepared using trephine burs under constant water cooling and under standardized conditions. They were assigned to five experimental groups. Tensile bond strength of five different adhesive agents (Clearfil New Bond, Etch & Prime 3.0, Excite, Histoacryl and Cyano Veneer was measured 15 min after application and after light curing of a composite material (Tetric Ceram, colour A2) added thereupon using a universal testing machine. Qualitative control was performed by scanning electron microscopy, while examining loaded and unloaded specimens. RESULTS: The measured tensile bond strength was as follows: Clearfil New Bond 8.00 MPa (+/-1.36 MPa), Etch & Prime 3.0 4.05 MPa (+/-1.52 MPa), Excite 2.96 MPa (+/-1.34 MPa), Histoacryl 5.22 MPa (+/-2.00 MPa), Cyano Veneer 4.56 MPa (+/-0.76 MPa). Clearfil New Bond showed significantly higher bond strength than the other four adhesives. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of unloaded specimens showed mixed modes of fracture. As regards the loaded specimens, no tag formation as known for dentine was found. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of an in vitro investigation it can be concluded that dentine adhesive systems might be useful for bone bonding. Tensile bond strength of the dentine adhesive systems tested on bone is comparable to that evaluated for dentine in earlier investigations.     

Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine

Objectives: The demand for restoration of root dentine defects such as cervical erosion and root caries has significantly increased recently, but there is limited information on the performance of the adhesive resins to radicular dentine. The purpose of this study was to measure the regional tensile bond strength (TBS) of composite bonded to human root and coronal dentine, and to observe the interface between resin and root dentine by SEM.

Methods: Human extracted cuspid teeth were used to measure TBS with a new microtensile bond test. Enamel and cementum were removed from the labial tooth surfaces to form a long cavity preparation into dentine from the mid-crown to the apex of the root within the same tooth. All Bond 2 (all etch technique) or Imperva Bond (no etch) was bonded to dentine surfaces and covered with Protect Liner resin composite. The resin-bonded teeth were serially sliced into 16 sections at right angles to the long axis of the tooth, and the bonded surfaces were trimmed to give a bonded surface area of 1 mm² for TBS testing.

Results: All Bond 2 bond strengths to coronal and apical dentine showed high values (23.5 MPa) but the bond strength was significantly lower on cervical root dentine. Imperva Bond produced a relatively high tensile bond strength to all regional areas. SEM showed that the thickness of the resin-infiltrated layer formed by All Bond 2 in root dentine was less than coronal areas. Resin infiltration with Imperva Bond was always less than 0.5 μm. The results suggest that high TBS values can be obtained with minimal resin infiltration in root dentine.     

A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of different caries removal techniques (conventional bur; chemomechanical removal/Carisolv()-MediTeam; a sonic preparation system/SonicsysMicro-Kavo and air abrasion/PrepStar-Danville Engineering) on microtensile bond strength to caries-affected human dentine. METHODS: Occlusal surfaces of extracted human permanent third molars with coronal dentine caries extending approximately halfway through the dentine was ground perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth to expose a flat surface of normal dentine surrounding the carious lesion with laser fluorescence values of approximately 30 (DIAGNODent), KaVo). Carious lesions were excavated with one of the four techniques until laser fluorescence values decreased to 15 in the center of the lesions. An ethanol-based dentine adhesive (Single Bond, 3M) was used to bond composite resin (P60, 3M) to the substrate. Vertical slices (n=11/group), approximately 0.8 mm thick were made through the caries-affected portions of each tooth, perpendicular to the bonding surface. Specimens were subjected to tensile stress at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. SEM investigation was performed for the qualitative evaluation of resin-dentine hybridization. RESULTS: The microtensile bond strengths were as follows (mean+/-SD in MPa): 6.4+/-5.3 (bur), 8.4+/-3.3 (Carisolv), 8.5+/-5.9 (Sonicsys Micro), and 8.8+/-8.8 (air abrasion). Statistical analysis did not show significant differences between any of the treatment modalities (p=0.160). Tensile fracture was cohesive within caries-affected dentine in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The four different caries removal techniques used within this study did not influence the bond strength of the tested dentine adhesive to caries-affected human dentine.     

Gap measurement and bond strength of five selected adhesive systems bonded to tooth structure

The ability of a restorative material to bond and seal the interface with tooth structure is perhaps the most significant factor in determining resistance to marginal caries. Thus, the quality and durability of marginal seal and bond strength are major considerations in the selection of restorative materials. The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength and marginal discrepancies of five adhesive systems: All-Bond 2, Clearfil Liner Bond, KB 200, ProBond and AELITE Bond. Twenty-five buccal and 25 lingual cavities were prepared in 25 caries-free extracted molar teeth, giving 10 cavities for each of the 5 adhesive systems. All teeth were restored with the resin composite Pertac Hybrid, or PRISMA Total Performance Hybrid with their appropriate adhesive systems. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled, were stained with a 1.5% aqueous solution of a procion dye (reactive orange 14) and sectioned coronally with a saw microtome. Three sections of 200 μm thickness were prepared from each restoration which were then examined microscopically to measure marginal gap widths using a confocal tandem microscope. Shear bond strength measurements were carried out on the dentine bond using a universal testing machine. The All-Bond 2 adhesive system was found to have higher shear bond strength and to have the least gap with at the cementodentinal margin.     

Effect of chlorhexidine and ethanol-wet bonding with a hydrophobic adhesive to intraradicular dentine

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of adjunctive application of ethanol-wet bonding and chlorhexidine (CHX) with a hydrophobic adhesive on bond durability of fibre posts to intraradicular dentine.

Methods

Ninety-six extracted human teeth with a single root and root canal were prepared for post placement after endodontic treatment. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 24) after etching and rinsing for rewetting: Group 1: water-wet bonding, Group 2: water-wet bonding with CHX, Group 3: ethanol-wet bonding and Group 4: ethanol-wet bonding with CHX. Teeth in Groups 1 and 2 were treated with either distilled water or distilled water with 2% CHX for 60 s; while teeth in Groups 3 and 4 were treated with either 100% ethanol or 100% ethanol with 2% CHX. Two coats of primer, followed by neat resin were applied and light-cured for 40 s. Fibre posts were luted to bonded root dentine using dual-cure resin cement. Bonded roots were subjected to push-out bond strength testing and interfacial nanoleakage evaluation after 24 h, 6 and 12 months of storage. Data were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA (rewetting solutions, time and post space regions) and SNK tests.

Results

Groups 3 and 4 showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher bond strengths and lower nanoleakage than Groups 1 and 2 after 12 months of ageing. Addition of 2% chlorhexidine to ethanol-wet bonding with a hydrophobic adhesive did not further improve the bonding of a fibre post to intraradicular dentine, when compared to ethanol-wet bonding alone after 12 months of ageing.

Clinical significance

Ethanol-wet bonding with a hydrophobic adhesive alone could improve the bond durability of fibre post to intraradicular dentine and therefore would increase the success rate of post and core restorations of endodontically treated teeth.     

Efficacy of using orthodontic adhesive resin in bonding and debonding characteristics of a calcium phosphate ceramic bracket

The aim of this study was to examine the shear bond strength between a new type of calcium phosphate ceramic bracket and human enamel using various types of adhesive resins after thermal cycling tests. Kurasper F, Light Bond, Super Bond C&B and Transbond XT were used as adhesive resins. A new Hyaline II bracket was bonded to human enamel using one of the above adhesive resins according to the manufacturer's instructions. Shear bond strengths were measured after immersion in water at 37 °C for 24 h, or after 2000 or 5000 cycles of thermal cycling between 5 °C and 55 °C. The Knoop hardness number (KHN) of Hyaline II and human enamel were measured. Significant differences in shear bond strength existed between Super Bond C&B and Transbond XT before thermal cycling. Four different adhesive resins produced significant differences in shear bond strength after thermal cycling compared with bond strength before thermal cycling. Four adhesive resins provided the clear formation of resin tags. The adhesive remnant indices were not significantly different among four adhesive resins. There are no significant difference in KHN at Hyaline II and human enamel. In conclusion, Hyaline II has an advantage for reducing the risk of enamel fracture or enamel crack without the loss of appropriate bond strength.     

Role of preliminary etching for one‐step self‐etch adhesives

Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Di Lenarda R, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Role of preliminary etching for one‐step self‐etch adhesives.
Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 517–524. © 2010 Eur J Oral Sci The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of preliminary phosphoric acid etching of enamel and dentine before the application of two, one‐step self‐etch adhesive systems. The systems were applied onto acid‐etched or smear‐layer‐covered enamel and dentine. The treatment groups were as follows: group 1, Adper Easy Bond (3M ESPE) on etched substrate; group 2, Adper Easy Bond (control); group 3, iBond Self‐Etch (Heraeus Kulzer) on etched substrate; and group 4, iBond Self‐Etch (control). Enamel and dentine bond strengths were calculated using microshear and microtensile bond‐strength tests. Additional specimens were prepared to evaluate nanoleakage at the dentine–adhesive interface and were investigated using light microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. Both adhesives demonstrated higher microshear bond strengths when enamel was pre‐acid‐etched with phosphoric acid (Adper Easy Bond 28.7 ± 4.8 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 19.7 ± 3.6 MPa) compared with controls (Adper Easy Bond 19.2 ± 3.3 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 17.5 ± 2.7 MPa) and increased microtensile bond strength when applied on acid‐etched (Adper Easy Bond 35.8 ± 5.7 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 24.3 ± 7.9 MPa) vs. smear‐layer‐covered dentine (Adper Easy Bond 26.9 ± 6.2 MPa; iBond Self‐Etch 17.6 ± 4.3 MPa). Adper Easy Bond showed lower nanoleakage than iBond Self‐Etch, irrespective of preliminary etching. The results of this study support the use of phosphoric acid etching before the application of one‐step self‐etch adhesive systems.     

Influence of ageing on self‐etch adhesives: one‐step vs. two‐step systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentine, interfacial nanoleakage expression, and stability after ageing, of two‐step vs. one‐step self‐etch adhesives. Human molars were cut to expose middle/deep dentine, assigned to groups (n = 15), and treated with the following bonding systems: (i) Optibond XTR (a two‐step self‐etch adhesive; Kerr), (ii) Clearfil SE Bond (a two‐step self‐etch adhesive; Kuraray), (iii) Adper Easy Bond (a one‐step self‐etch adhesive; 3M ESPE), and (iv) Bond Force (a one‐step self‐etch adhesive; Tokuyama). Specimens were processed for μTBS testing after 24 h, 6 months, or 1 yr of storage in artificial saliva at 37°C. Nanoleakage expression was examined in similarly processed additional specimens. At baseline the μTBS results ranked in the following order: Adper Easy Bond = Optibond XTR ≥Clearfil SE = Bond Force, and interfacial nanoleakage analysis showed Clearfil SE Bond = Adper Easy Bond = Optibond XTR> Bond Force. After 1 yr of storage, Optibond XTR, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy Bond showed higher μTBS and lower interfacial nanoleakage expression compared with Bond Force. In conclusion, immediate bond strength, nanoleakage expression, and stability over time were not related to the number of steps of the bonding systems, but to their chemical formulations.