High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: effects on drug response and interindividual variability.

AIM: To assess platelet inhibitory effects, interindividual variability in platelet inhibition as well as response to a 600 mg, compared to a standard 300 mg, clopidogrel loading dose (LD) after coronary stenting METHODS AND RESULTS: Platelet function profiles were assessed in 50 patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving either a 300 mg (n=27) or 600 mg clopidogrel LD. ADP (6 microM) and collagen (6 microg/mL) induced platelet aggregation, as well as ADP (2 microM) induced glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 h following clopidogrel front-loading. A more intense and rapid inhibition of platelet activation (both GP IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression) were achieved using a 600 mg, compared to a 300 mg, LD throughout the entire 48 hours (p<0.001). Although there were no differences in platelet aggregation, overall a 600 mg LD increased the number of clopidogrel responders and this was also achieved earlier compared to a 300 mg LD. A 600 mg LD did not reduce interindividual variability of platelet response. CONCLUSION: The use of a 600 mg clopidogrel LD in patients undergoing coronary stenting optimises platelet inhibitory effects early after intervention and may provide a more effective protection against early thrombotic complications.     

Antiplatelet effects of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel are not attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin or simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting.

AIMS: To test prospectively whether the antiplatelet effect of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is attenuated in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary artery stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples were obtained at least 2 h after receiving 100 mg aspirin and 600 mg clopidogrel and prior to coronary stenting from 90 patients without statin therapy and 90 patients with statin (atorvastatin and simvastatin) therapy for at least 4 weeks. Maximal and residual platelet aggregation was evaluated with optical aggregometry in response to ADP (5 and 20 micromol/l). Surface expression of IIb/IIIa (CD61) and P-selectin (CD62) was assessed with whole blood flow-cytometry at baseline and following stimulation (5 and 20 micromol/l ADP). Inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation was not impaired in the presence of concomitant statin therapy. Moreover, patients with and without statin therapy did not differ in respect to all flow-cytometric parameters obtained. CONCLUSION: The antiplatelet effect of a high, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel is not diminished in patients receiving atorvastatin and simvastatin for at least 4 weeks prior to coronary stenting.     

P2Y12 platelet inhibition in clinical practice

Platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation play a pivotal role in atherothrombosis. Intracoronary atherothrombosis is the most common cause of the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and plays a central role in complications occurring around percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) including recurrent ACS, procedure-related myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by medical treatment impairs formation and progression of thrombotic processes and is therefore of great importance in the prevention of complications after an ACS or around PCI. An essential part in the platelet activation process is the interaction of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) with the platelet P2Y12 receptor. The P2Y12 receptor is the predominant receptor involved in the ADP-stimulated activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. Activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor results in enhanced platelet degranulation and thromboxane production, and prolonged platelet aggregation. The objectives of this review are to discuss the pharmacological limitations of the P2Y12 inhibitor clopidogrel, and describe the novel alternative P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor and the clinical implications of the introduction of these new medicines.     

The platelet-related effects of tenecteplase versus alteplase versus reteplase.

Clinical studies have investigated the combination of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytic agents for acute myocardial infarction. However, thrombolytic agents alone may possess direct antiplatelet properties that could affect reperfusion. Blood from 11 patients with coronary disease and five healthy subjects was incubated for 30 min with tenecteplase (4, 12, and 24 microg/ml), alteplase (1, 4, and 10 microg/ml), reteplase (1, 5, and 10 microg/ml) or control buffer. Platelet aggregation induced by 1, 20 and 50 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP), the stimulated expression of GP IIb/IIIa and P-selectin, and plasma fibrinogen levels were determined. Platelet aggregation in patients was inhibited by medium and high concentrations of alteplase when induced by 1 micromol/l ADP [1.6 +/- 0.5%, P = 0.001 and 0.9 +/- 0.2%, P = 0.002 versus 8.3 +/- 1.6% (control)] and 20 micromol/l ADP [46.9 +/- 3.9%, P = 0.001 and 46.2 +/- 4.8%, P = 0.001 versus 65.7 +/- 2.7% (control)]. High concentration tenecteplase was associated with lower aggregation by 20 micromol/l ADP (58 +/- 2.1% versus control, P = 0.033). There were no changes in GP IIb/IIIa activation or P-selectin expression in patients or healthy subjects. Platelet aggregation (1 micromol/l ADP) in healthy subjects was inhibited only by high doses of alteplase (P = 0.001). Plasma fibrinogen levels were significantly decreased after treatment with reteplase at 1 microg/ml(1.53 +/- 0.21 versus 2.65 +/- 0.31, P = .009) and 5 microg/ml(1.55 +/- 0.16 versus 2.65 +/- 0.31, P = .005). Alteplase inhibits platelet aggregation more than tenecteplase and reteplase. The attenuation of platelet aggregation by alteplase is dissociated from the expression of activated GP IIb/IIIa and P-selectin, and by fibrinogen degradation. These results suggest that alteplase exerts its antiplatelet effect independent of GP IIb/IIIa and P-selectin expressions and fibrinogen degradation. These findings may be directly relevant to the effect of alteplase on reperfusion and to future studies using combined platelet inhibitors and thrombolytic therapy.     

Platelet aggregation upon acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel treatment and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa content in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Interaction between aggregating activity of platelets and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (fibrinogen receptor) content on their surface was investigated in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Eighty nine ACS patients were included into the study - 69 with and 20 without elevation of ST segment. Blood was collected within the first hour of admission to the clinic (1 day), and then at 3-5 and 8-12 days. All patients received standard antiaggregant therapy - acetylsalicylic acid - ASA (thromboxane A2 synthesis inhibitor) and clopidogrel (ADP receptor antagonist). Platelet aggregation was analyzed at the first time point when patients had already taken ASA but not clopidogrel, and then (3-5 and 8- 12 days) upon combined therapy with both preparations. Aggregation was induced by 5 and 20 uM ADP and measured by turbidimetric method. In comparison with the initial level (1 day, ASA) at days 3-5, i.e. after development of clopidogrel effect, platelet aggregation was decreased by 54 and 40% upon its stimulation with 5 and 20 uM ADP, and was not further changed at days 8-12. GP IIb/IIIa content on platelet surface was determined by binding of 125I-labelled monoclonal antibody CRC64. GP IIb/IIIa number varied from 31100 to 73000 per platelet with the mean level of 48500 +/- 8400 (mean +/- standard deviation). No differences were detected between mean GP IIb/IIIa number at 1, 3-5 and 8-12 days after ACS onset. Upon repeat GP IIb/IIIa measurement coefficient of variation was 6.1% demonstrating the stability of this parameter in each patient. Positive correlation between platelet aggregation and GP IIb/IIIa content was detected at the first day - correlation coefficients (r) 0.425 and 0.470 for 5 and 20 uM ADP (n=57, p<0.001). However positive association between these parameters was not revealed at 3-5 and 8-12 days, when patients received not only ASA but clopidogrel as well (r from -0.054 to -0.237, p>0.05). These results indicates that variations of GP IIb/IIIa content affect platelet aggregating activity within first hours of ACS upon ASA treatment. However after saturation with clopidogrel this factor has no significant influence on platelet aggregation, at least on aggregation induced by ADP which receptor is the target of this antiaggregant. Under such conditions aggregation parameters are presumably influenced first of all by individual characteristics of clopidogrel pharmacokinetics.     

Effect of clopidogrel with and without eptifibatide on tumor necrosis factor-alpha and C-reactive protein release after elective stenting: results from the CLEAR PLATELETS 1b study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to compare the effects of antiplatelet regimens on early inflammation and cardiac marker release after elective stenting. BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding the comparative effects of specific antiplatelet regimens on early inflammation marker release after stenting. METHODS: In a 2 x 2 factorial randomized investigation, patients undergoing stenting were treated with either clopidogrel alone (300 mg or 600 mg; n = 60) or clopidogrel with eptifibatide (n = 60). Platelet aggregation (5 and 20 muM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]), ADP-stimulated expression of active glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, and platelet-bound P-selectin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, C-reactive protein (CRP), and cardiac markers were measured. RESULTS: Compared with a strategy of clopidogrel alone, clopidogrel + eptifibatide reduced the release of cardiac markers. A marked reduction in platelet aggregation and active GP IIb/IIIa expression (p < or = 0.001) with clopidogrel + eptifibatide was associated with a decrease in CRP and TNF-alpha release (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of clopidogrel with GP IIb/IIIa blockade resulted in superior inhibition of inflammation and cardiac marker release, which was accompanied by superior platelet inhibition immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with a strategy of clopidogrel alone. The mechanistic and clinical implications of attenuated periprocedural inflammation and myocardial necrosis with a strategy of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition warrant further investigation.     

Clopidogrel inhibits platelet-leukocyte interactions and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-induced platelet activation in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the effects of clopidogrel on the activation of circulating platelets, the activation and aggregation of ex vivo platelets, and the interactions with leukocytes in patients with a non-ST-segment elevation in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: The significant benefits of clopidogrel in cardiovascular trials suggest that blockage of the P2Y(12) receptor may be associated with important biologic consequences. METHODS: Blood samples obtained from 23 ACS patients before and 24 h after a loading dose of clopidogrel (300 mg) were analyzed by whole-blood flow cytometry, light transmission aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma, and plasma enzyme-linked immunoassays. A thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were used as agonists. Normal individuals pretreated with aspirin served as controls. RESULTS: Clopidogrel attenuated platelet aggregation to both ADP (10 micromol/l) and TRAP (10 micromol/l) by 22% and P-selectin expression by 16% and 25%, respectively. The drug decreased the excess platelet-monocyte and platelet-neutrophil conjugates found in the blood of ACS patients (p < 0.01) and prevented their formation ex vivo with agonist stimulation. Plasma levels of soluble CD40L were reduced by 27% (p < 0.001) and of soluble P-selectin by 15% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel attenuates the agonist effects of ADP and TRAP on platelet secretion, aggregation, and formation of platelet-monocyte and platelet-neutrophil conjugates in patients with ACS. These effects may all contribute to the clinical benefits of the drug in these syndromes.     

Prasugrel 5 mg inhibits platelet P-selectin and GPIIb–IIIa expression in very elderly and non elderly: results from the GENERATIONS trial,a pharmacodynamic study in stable CAD patients

Platelet P-selectin and activated glycoprotein IIb–IIIa (GPIIb–IIIa) are markers of platelet activation and mediates platelet aggregation. Prasugrel (Pras) 5 mg may be used in very elderly (VE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI, but its effect on platelet P-selectin and activated GPIIb–IIIa in those patients is not known. Stable ACS patients, VE (78 ± 5 years, n = 23) and non-elderly (NE) (55 ± 5 years, n = 22) were randomized to Pras (5 or 10 mg) or clopidogrel (Clop) 75 mg during three 12-day periods. Platelet activation markers were measured by flow cytometry on unstimulated or stimulated (adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 20 μM) platelets, before and after each dosing period.Results: At baseline there was no difference in platelet activation markers, either unstimulated or ADP-stimulated, between NE and VE. Pras 5 mg reduced both ADP-stimulated platelet P-selectin and activated GPIIb–IIIa in VE (p < 0.01 for both analyses) and NE (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Clop 75 mg had a similar effect as Pras 5 mg but did not significantly reduce activated GPIIb–IIIa in VE. Prasugrel 10 mg resulted in decreased platelet activation in both age groups compared to Clop 75 mg (p < 0.01).Conclusions: In VE and NE-patients, Pras 5 mg inhibited platelet P-selectin expression similar to Clop 75 mg and Pras 10 mg. Prasugrel 10 mg inhibited platelet P-selectin expression better than Clop 75 mg. Prasugrel 10 mg and 5 mg, but not Clop 75 mg, significantly inhibited activated GPIIb–IIIa in VE. This platelet reactivity data support the use of Pras 5 mg for VE patients.     

Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients who suffered subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) have higher post-treatment reactivity than those who do not encounter stent thrombosis. BACKGROUND: High post-treatment platelet reactivity has been reported after coronary stenting after clopidogrel therapy and may be an important factor in the occurrence of SAT. METHODS: We identified patients with SAT treated at two tertiary care centers over a 1.5-year period. Light transmittance aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid, total and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa after stimulation with ADP, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation levels to measure P2Y12 receptor inhibition were determined (n = 20) and compared with an age-matched group of patients without SAT (n = 100). High post-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as >75th percentile ADP-induced aggregation in the group without SAT. RESULTS: The SAT patients had higher mean platelet reactivity than those without SAT by all measurements (p < 0.05): 49 +/- 4% versus 33 +/- 2% for 5 micromol/l ADP-induced aggregation and 65 +/- 3% versus 51 +/- 2% for 20 micromol/l ADP-induced aggregation (p < 0.001), 69 +/- 5% versus 46 +/- 9% for P2Y12 reactivity ratio (p = 0.03), and 138 +/- 19 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) versus 42 +/- 4 MFI for stimulated GP IIb/IIIa expression (p < 0.001). Of patients with SAT, 60% had high platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: High post-treatment platelet reactivity and incomplete P2Y12 receptor inhibition are risk factors for SAT. Measures to uniformly determine platelet reactivity after coronary stenting and treatment strategies to improve P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity should be further investigated.     

Platelet-monocyte aggregates predict troponin rise after percutaneous coronary intervention and are inhibited by Abciximab

BACKGROUND: Platelet-monocyte aggregates and other markers of platelet activation were investigated before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with abciximab therapy. The study sought to assess the relationship between the level of platelet-monocyte aggregation and increases in cardiac troponin I post coronary intervention. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 40 patients before PCI and 10 min after abciximab administration. These were tested for platelet activation markers by flow cytometry. Cardiac troponin I levels were assayed at baseline and at 24 h post PCI. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, patients with coronary artery disease had elevated markers of platelet activation including platelet-monocyte aggregates, P-selectin and PAC-1 (a marker specific for activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) prior to PCI. Increased levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates before PCI were associated with increased expression of P-selectin on the platelet surface. Abciximab therapy reduced platelet-monocyte aggregate levels but had no effect on P-selectin expression. The high levels of expression of activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (PAC-1) on platelets prior to PCI was reduced with abciximab therapy. Patients with higher levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates prior to PCI were more likely to develop an elevation of cardiac troponin I during the 24 h after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates may predict patients at risk for troponin elevation following PCI and identify those most likely to benefit from abciximab.     

The inhibitory potency of clopidogrel on ADP-induced platelet activation is not attenuated when it is co-administered with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) for 5 weeks in patients with acute coronary syndromes

The antiplatelet potency of clopidogrel may be attenuated by short-term co-administration of lipophilic statins metabolized through the cytochrome P-450, isoform 3A4. We investigated whether the co-administration of atorvastatin (20?mg/day) for 5 weeks, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) could affect the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel. Fifty-one patients with the first episode of an ACS were included in the study. All patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received a loading dose of 375 mg of clopidogrel, followed by 75 mg/day for at least 3 months. Twenty-six of them presented with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >100?mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l) (measured within 24 h from the onset of symptoms) and received daily 20 mg/day of atorvastatin. The ADP- or TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, as well as P-selectin and CD40L surface expression, were studied at baseline (within 30 min after admission) and 5 weeks afterwards. Atorvastatin did not influence either the clopidogrel-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation initiated by 5 or 10 microM ADP or the clopidogrel-induced reduction of the membrane expression of P-selectin and CD40L induced by ADP. In conclusion, atorvastatin, even at a dose of 20 mg/day does not affect the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel when co-administered for 5 weeks in ACS patients.     

Increased platelet aggregation induced activity by anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antibody in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Interaction of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa with fibrinogen is the final and key reaction in platelet aggregation. In order to evaluate GP IIb-IIIa functional activity in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) we measured platelet aggregation induced by monoclonal antibody CRC54 which is directed against GP IIb/IIIa and is able to stimulate its binding with fibrinogen and subsequent aggregation. Patients with ACS were divided into 3 groups: (1) with Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), (2) with non Q-wave MI and with unstable angina. Patients with stable angina (SA) and healthy donors formed 2 comparison groups. The level and rate of CRC54-induced aggregation measured both in the absence and in the presence of prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)), the inhibitor of platelet activation, in all groups of patients with ACS were > or =1.5 times higher than in SA patients and healthy donors. Observed differences in the parameters of CRC54-induced aggregation at least in the presence of PGE(1) could be caused only by increased GP IIb/IIIa fibrinogen binding ability in ACS patients, but not by differences in the level of platelet activation. In all groups of patients with ACS, but not in SA patients and healthy donors, strong correlation (r=-0.5-0.7) was observed between increased parameters of ADP-induced aggregation and aggregation stimulated by CRC54 in the presence of PGE(1). The data obtained indicated that increased of platelet aggregating capacity in ACS might be caused by changes of GP IIb/IIIa functional characteristics and not by enhancement of platelet sensitivity towards physiological agonists including ADP.     

Failure of clopidogrel to reduce platelet reactivity and activation following standard dosing in elective stenting: implications for thrombotic events and restenosis

There is no information on long-term platelet reactivity and activation following elective stenting in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. We measured platelet reactivity and activation at baseline and at 2 h, 24 h, 5 days and 30 days following coronary stenting (n = 94). Patients were treated with the standard aspirin (325 mg) and clopidogrel regimen (300 mg load/75 mg qd). Reactivity was measured by aggregation (5 and 20 microM ADP) and activation was determined by the expression of total and active GP IIb/IIIa. Reactivity and activation were defined as heightened when post-stent aggregation and receptor expression exceeded baseline levels, respectively. Prolonged heightened platelet reactivity was detected by both 5 and 20 microM ADP aggregation. Using 20 microM ADP aggregation, heightened reactivity occurred in 55% of patients at 2 h, 26% at 24 h, 21% at 5 days, and 15% at 30 days post-stenting. A high frequency of heightened platelet activation was detected by both total and active GP IIb/IIIa expression. Using expression of the active GP IIb/IIIa receptor as the marker, activation was greater than baseline in 27% of patients at 2 h, 20% at 24 h, 30% at 5 days, and 22% at 30 days post-stenting. This is the first report demonstrating that a significant percentage of patients receiving standard clopidogrel and aspirin therapy for coronary stenting will have post-drug platelet reactivity and activation above baseline that persists for 30 days after the procedure. These finding suggest insufficient platelet inhibition. The clinical importance of these findings should be further investigated to establish the potential link between insufficient platelet inhibition, stent thrombosis, and restenosis.     

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: special effects in selected patients?

Coronary thrombosis is a pivotal event in the pathogenesis ofacute coronary syndromes (ACS) as well as in the incidence ofthrombotic complications resulting from percutaneous coronaryinterventions (PCIs).¹ Platelet adhesion and aggregation atthe site of spontaneous or provoked plaque rupture is an importantcontributor of such intracoronary thrombus formation. As activationof the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor is the finalcommon pathway in the process leading to platelet aggregation,inhibitors of the platelet GP IIb/IIIa are potent agents toprevent progression to myocardial infarction (MI) and death.In a recent meta-analysis of six phase III randomized trials,which enrolled 31 402 ACS patients without ST-elevationwho were not scheduled for early PCI, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitorswere associated     

Failure of clopidogrel to reduce platelet reactivity and activation following standard dosing in elective stenting: implications for thrombotic events and restenosis

There is no information on long-term platelet reactivity and activation following elective stenting in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. We measured platelet reactivity and activation at baseline and at 2 h, 24 h, 5 days and 30 days following coronary stenting (n = 94). Patients were treated with the standard aspirin (325 mg) and clopidogrel regimen (300 mg load/75 mg qd). Reactivity was measured by aggregation (5 and 20 μM ADP) and activation was determined by the expression of total and active GP IIb/IIIa. Reactivity and activation were defined as heightened when post-stent aggregation and receptor expression exceeded baseline levels, respectively. Prolonged heightened platelet reactivity was detected by both 5 and 20 μM ADP aggregation. Using 20 μM ADP aggregation, heightened reactivity occurred in 55% of patients at 2 h, 26% at 24 h, 21% at 5 days, and 15% at 30 days post-stenting. A high frequency of heightened platelet activation was detected by both total and active GP IIb/IIIa expression. Using expression of the active GP IIb/IIIa receptor as the marker, activation was greater than baseline in 27% of patients at 2 h, 20% at 24 h, 30% at 5 days, and 22% at 30 days post-stenting. This is the first report demonstrating that a significant percentage of patients receiving standard clopidogrel and aspirin therapy for coronary stenting will have post-drug platelet reactivity and activation above baseline that persists for 30 days after the procedure. These finding suggest insufficient platelet inhibition. The clinical importance of these findings should be further investigated to establish the potential link between insufficient platelet inhibition, stent thrombosis, and restenosis.     

Human platelet alphaIIbeta3 integrin binding affinity and specificity of SJ874: antiplatelet efficacy versus aspirin

OBJECTIVE: To define the affinity and specificity of SJ874, a nonpeptide antiplatelet agent for platelet glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa integrin, and to determine the antiplatelet efficacy of SJ874 relative to those of glycoprotein IIbIIIa antagonists and aspirin. METHODS: Binding affinity and specificity of SJ874 for platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin were determined using integrin-mediated binding and adhesion assays with human cells. Additionally, the antiplatelet efficacy of SJ874 was determined and compared with those of other glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and aspirin using light-transmittance and laser-scattering aggregometry. RESULTS: SJ874 inhibited aggregation of human platelets induced by 10 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) with a concentration for half-maximal effect of 0.046 +/- 0.005 micromol/l using light-transmittance aggregometry. Using laser-scattering aggregometry, SJ874 was found to totally inhibit formation both of micro-aggregates and of macro-aggregates induced either by ADP or by epinephrine. In contrast, administration of 325 mg aspirin to normal healthy volunteers attenuated formation of macro-aggregates but not micro-aggregates. SJ874 inhibited binding of [125I]-fibrinogen to activated (by ADP, epinephrine, and arachidonic acid at concentrations of 100 micromol/l each) gel-filtered human platelets with a concentration for half-maximal effect of 0.0012 +/- 0.0005 micromol/l. SJ874 was demonstrated to associate more tightly with resting human platelets than did DMP754 [1] and slightly less tightly than did DMP802 [2]. SJ874 was demonstrated to exhibit a high degree of specificity for platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (alphaIIb/beta3) integrin compared with other known integrins, including alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and alpha5beta1 (concentration for half-maximal effect > 100 micromol/l). CONCLUSION: SJ874 is a potent and specific platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist with high affinity for and tight association with human platelets. These data suggest that SJ874 might have good antiplatelet utility for inhibiting formation both of platelet micro-aggregates and of macro-aggregates of platelets and a long duration of action in humans due to its slow dissociation from human platelets.     

Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance.

We evaluated the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients (n = 150) treated with aspirin but not clopidogrel had blood samples drawn at baseline and 24 h after clopidogrel loading. Depending on the definition used, 9% to 15% were resistant to aspirin and 24% to clopidogrel. About half of the aspirin-resistant patients were also resistant to clopidogrel. As a group, aspirin-resistant patients had lower response to clopidogrel (assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers) than aspirin-sensitive patients. Both aspirin- and clopidogrel-resistant patients had higher incidence of creatine kinase-MB elevation than the respective sensitive patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Wide variability has been reported in response to aspirin and clopidogrel. There are limited data on the simultaneous responses to both drugs. METHODS: Elective PCI patients (n = 150) who received aspirin for > or = 1 week but not clopidogrel were included. All patients received bivalirudin during PCI. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20 to 24 h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin resistance was defined by > or = 2 of 3 criteria: rapid platelet function analyzer-ASA score > or = 550, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation > or = 70%, and 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or = 20%. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or = 10% in response to 5 and 20 micromol/l ADP. RESULTS: Nineteen (12.7%) patients were resistant to aspirin and 36 (24%) to clopidogrel. Nine (47.4%) of the aspirin-resistant patients were also clopidogrel resistant. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be women and have diabetes than were aspirin-sensitive patients. They also had lower response to clopidogrel, assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers (flow cytometry-determined PAC-1 binding and P-selectin expression). Elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band after stenting occurred more frequently in aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients (38.9% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.04) and in clopidogrel-resistant versus clopidogrel-sensitive patients (32.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-resistant patients as a group have reduced response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, we have identified a unique group of dual drug-resistant patients who may be at increased risk for thrombotic complications after PCI.     

Antiplatelet Strategies: Evaluating Their Current Role in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post‐PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high‐risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

不同维持剂量氯吡格雷对择期经皮冠脉介入治疗患者术后血小板聚集率的影响

目的 探讨不同维持剂量氯吡格雷对择期经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)患者血小板聚集率的影响及其临床意义.方法 随机双盲将118例择期PCI患者分为A、B两组,术前600 mg负荷剂量相同,术后第1天开始分别给予不同剂量氯吡格雷(波立维、法国赛诺菲-安万特公司生产)75 mg/d或150 mg/d,于术前及术后1天、7天、14天和30天评估血小板聚集率.结果 A、B两组患者术前和术后1天ADP诱导的血小板聚集率和最大聚集时间比较无显著性差异,而术后7天、14天、30天比较差异有显著性.结论 较高剂量的氯吡格雷可以降低择期PCI患者的血小板聚集功能.     

Influence of aspirin resistance on platelet function profiles in patients on long-term aspirin and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention

Increased platelet inhibition is achieved when clopidogrel is added to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]). A broad variability in platelet inhibition profiles during the early phases of treatment has been demonstrated and may be attributed to ASA resistance. However, the influence of ASA sensitivity on platelet function profiles of patients on long-term dual antiplatelet therapy has yet to be explored. A total of 135 patients who had previously undergone percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term (>1 month) ASA and clopidogrel therapy was included. The PFA-100 system was used to define ASA resistance. Platelet aggregation, after adenosine diphosphate (6 and 20 micromol/L) and collagen (6 microg/ml) stimuli, and platelet activation (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression), after adenosine diphosphate (2 micromol/L) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (50 micromol/L) stimuli, were assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and flow cytometry, respectively. Patient variability in response to treatment was defined by the coefficient of variability. ASA resistance was found in 60 of 135 patients (44%). Patients with diabetes were more frequently ASA resistant. Collagen/epinephrine- and collagen/adenosine diphosphate-coated cartridges on the PFA-100 had shorter closure times in the ASA-resistant population compared with ASA-sensitive patients. Platelet aggregation and activation were significantly higher in ASA-resistant patients. A broad variability (coefficient of variation >0.25) in patient response to treatment was observed in ASA-resistant and -sensitive patients. In conclusion, ASA resistance is associated with increased platelet reactivity in patients on long-term dual antiplatelet treatment.