Sustained prolongation of the QTc interval after anesthesia with sevoflurane in infants during the first 6 months of life

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic frequently administered to infants, prolongs the QT interval of the electrocardiogram in adults. A long QT interval resulting in fatal arrhythmia may also be responsible for some cases of sudden death in infants. As the QT interval increases during the second month of life and returns to the values recorded at birth by the sixth month, we evaluated the effect of sevoflurane on the QT interval during and after anesthesia in this particular population. METHODS: In this prospective two-group trial we examined pre-, peri-, and postoperative electrocardiograms of 36 infants aged 1 to 6 months scheduled for elective inguinal or umbilical hernia repair. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with either sevoflurane, or the well-established pediatric anesthetic halothane. Heart rate corrected (c) QTc and JTc interval (indicator of intraventricular conduction delays) were recorded from electrocardiograms before and during anesthesia, and at 60 min after emergence from anesthesia. RESULTS: Prolonged QTc was observed during sevoflurane anesthesia (mean [+/-SD], 473 +/- 19 ms, P< 0.01). Sixty minutes after emergence from anesthesia, QTc was still prolonged (433 +/- 15 ms) in infants treated with sevoflurane compared with those treated with halothane (407 +/- 33 ms, P< 0.01). Analogous differences were found for the JTc interval. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a shorter elimination time than better known inhalational anesthetics, sevoflurane induction and anesthesia results in sustained prolongations of QTc and JTc interval in infants in the first 6 months of life. Electrocardiogram monitoring until the QTc interval has returned to preanesthetic values may increase safety after sevoflurane anesthesia.     

The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane on QT interval of the ECG

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is any significant difference between the effects of desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane on the QT interval, QT dispersion, heart rate corrected QT interval and QTc dispersion of the electrocardiogram. METHODS: The study was conducted in a prospective, double blind and randomized manner in a teaching hospital. Ninety ASA I patients, aged 16-50 yr, undergoing general anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery were studied. RESULTS: There was no significant change in QT intervals during the study in any group (P > 0.05). QT dispersion in the sevoflurane group 49+/-14 ms vs. 37+/-10 ms; in the desflurane group 55+/-16 and 62+/-21 ms vs. 35+/-14 ms and in the isoflurane group 54+/-26 and 59+/-24 ms vs. 42+/-19 ms were significantly increased at 3 and 10 min after 1 MAC of steady end-tidal anaesthetic concentration compared with baseline values (P < 0.05). QTc values in the sevoflurane group were 444+/-24 and 435+/-2 1ms vs. 413+/-19 ms (P < 0.05), in the isoflurane group were 450+/-26 and 455+/-34 ms vs. 416+/-34 ms (P < 0.05), in the desflurane group were 450+/-26 and 455+/-34 ms vs. 416+/-34 ms (P < 0.05) at 3 and 10 min after reaching 1 MAC of anaesthetic concentration and significantly increased compared with baseline values. QTc dispersion increased significantly with sevoflurane 62+/-14 ms vs. 45+/-16 ms (P < 0.05); isoflurane 70+/-36 ms at 3 min and 75+/-36 ms at 10 min after reaching 1 MAC of anaesthetic concentration vs. 50+/-24 ms (P < 0.05); desflurane 67+/-25 ms at 3 min and 74+/-27 ms at 10 min after 1 MAC concentration vs. 41+/-22 ms (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane all prolonged QTd, QTc and QTcd but there were no significant intergroup differences.     

Sustained Prolongation of the QTc Interval after Anesthesia with Sevoflurane in Infants during the First 6 Months of Life

Background: Sevoflurane, an inhalational anesthetic frequently administered to infants, prolongs the QT interval of the electrocardiogram in adults. A long QT interval resulting in fatal arrhythmia may also be responsible for some cases of sudden death in infants. As the QT interval increases during the second month of life and returns to the values recorded at birth by the sixth month, we evaluated the effect of sevoflurane on the QT interval during and after anesthesia in this particular population.

Methods: In this prospective two-group trial we examined pre-, peri-, and postoperative electrocardiograms of 36 infants aged 1 to 6 months scheduled for elective inguinal or umbilical hernia repair. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with either sevoflurane, or the well-established pediatric anesthetic halothane. Heart rate corrected (c) QTc and JTc interval (indicator of intraventricular conduction delays) were recorded from electrocardiograms before and during anesthesia, and at 60 min after emergence from anesthesia.

Results: Prolonged QTc was observed during sevoflurane anesthesia (mean [+/-SD], 473 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.01). Sixty minutes after emergence from anesthesia, QTc was still prolonged (433 +/- 15 ms) in infants treated with sevoflurane compared with those treated with halothane (407 +/- 33 ms, P < 0.01). Analogous differences were found for the JTc interval.     

The Influence of desflurane on QTc interval

Volatile anesthetics may prolong the QTc interval and this may result in grave cardiac arrhythmias. We assessed the effect of desflurane on the QTc interval in 40 ASA physical status I or II patients. Volatile anesthetic induction with desflurane was performed, and after obtaining adequate level of anesthesia, QTc interval, heart rate, and noninvasive arterial blood pressure were measured. Prolongation of the QTc interval was observed within the first minute of anesthesia. There were no differences in QTc interval changes between sexes at any time. We conclude that desflurane prolongs the QTc interval, but that there are no differences between genders in sensitivity to this action. IMPLICATIONS: We assessed the effect of desflurane on QTc interval in patients without cardiac diseases. Prolongation of the interval was evident by the first minute of desflurane anesthesia. There were no differences between female and male patients.     

Recovery and pharmacokinetic parameters of desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane in patients undergoing urologic procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics and the speed of recovery after inhalation anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane in elective surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 30 ASA physical status I and II adults presenting for elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced with etomidate and maintained with desflurane (n = 10), sevoflurane (n = 10), or isoflurane (n = 10) and nitrous oxide. The inhalation drugs were titrated until an adequate clinical depth of anesthesia was reached. At the end of anesthesia, the patients breathed oxygen via the endotracheal tube and after extubation via a face mask. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to age, weight, duration of anesthesia, and mean arterial pressure. Mean end-tidal concentration (FA = FA0) at the end of anesthesia was 6.34 +/- 1.15% after desflurane, 1.85 +/- 0.42% after sevoflurane, and 1.10 +/- 0.24% after isoflurane. FA/FA0 decreased significantly faster with desflurane than with isoflurane, while there was little difference between desflurane and sevoflurane. As for the terminal half-life (t1/2), there were no differences among the groups (8.16 +/- 3.15 min after desflurane, 9.47 +/- 4.46 min after sevoflurane, and 10.0 +/- 5.57 min after isoflurane). The time until a command was followed for the first time was the same in all three groups (13.0 +/- 4.7 min after desflurane, 13.4 +/- 4.4 min after sevoflurane, and 13.6 +/- 3.4 min after isoflurane). There was no significant correlation between duration of anesthesia and the time until recovery. CONCLUSIONS: There are only minor differences with regard to the recovery phase in premedicated patients who receive clinically titrated inhalation anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane, or isoflurane.     

The effect of inhalational anaesthetics on QTc interval

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess time dependent cumulative effects of three different inhalation anaesthetics on QTc interval during the maintenance of anaesthesia. METHOD: Seventy-five ASA I-II male patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly allocated into three groups. No premedication was given. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental and tracheal intubation was facilitated by vecuronium in all groups. Anaesthesia was maintained with 0.8% halothane (Group I) (n = 25), 1% isoflurane (Group II) (n = 25), or 2% sevoflurane (Group III) (n = 25) and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Three lead electrocardiogram recordings were taken before induction, 2, 5, 10, 15, 30 and 45 min after induction and after extubation. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure and SpO2 were recorded at the same time. Heart rate and corrected QT interval were evaluated by using Bazett's formula. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures was used to determine intergroup and intragroup differences. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline QTc values of the groups. There was no difference between QTc values with halothane and sevoflurane. There was a difference between QTc values with isoflurane and those with the other two inhalation anaesthetics (P < 0.05). Although QTc values in the isoflurane group were higher at all times, the critical value of 440 ms was not exceeded. CONCLUSION: We conclude that halothane 0.8%, isoflurane 1% and sevoflurane 2% do not prolong QTc interval.     

Desflurane anesthesia after sevoflurane inhaled induction reduces severity of emergence agitation in children undergoing minor ear-nose-throat surgery compared with sevoflurane induction and maintenance

Emergence agitation may occur after general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics in children. We designed this study to examine the emergence behavior of children undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery after sevoflurane induction and desflurane maintenance versus both sevoflurane induction and maintenance using a recently published Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale. In 38 premedicated children aged 12 mo to 7 yr mask induction with sevoflurane was performed and they were randomly assigned to receive either sevoflurane (n = 19) or desflurane (n = 19) for maintenance of general anesthesia. Time to tracheal extubation, modified Aldrete score, emergence behavior, recovery complications, and pain scores were assessed. The PAED scale showed a significant advantage for desflurane (6 [0-15] versus 12 [2-20], maximum total score of 20 for severe agitation). Time to extubation was significantly shorter with desflurane than with sevoflurane (5.4 +/- 1.4 versus 13.4 +/- 1.8 min). The modified Aldrete score on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was significantly lower in children receiving sevoflurane for maintenance. Time to discharge from PACU to normal ward and the incidence of adverse effects were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, the use of desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia after sevoflurane induction in children is associated with less severe emergence agitation and faster emergence times.     

The effect of anesthetic technique on recovery from neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of four anesthetic techniques on recovery after a single dose of 0.2 mg/kg of cisatracurium. PATIENTS AND METHOD: After giving informed consent, 96 patients of both sexes, ASA I-III, were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol O2-N2O (FiO2 40%) after which the patients were randomly assigned to four groups according to maintenance technique: propofol by infusion, sevoflurane, desflurane or isoflurane at 1.3 MAC. Neuromuscular block was monitored (electromyographic recording of the pollicis adductor). Variables recorded were time of maximum block, duration of action of 1% and 25%, and recovery indices at T0-TR75 andT25%-T75%. ANOVA was performed ( = 0.05 and beta = 0.1). RESULTS: The groups were homogeneous. Time until recovery of 25% of baseline amplitude of the first response to a train of four (TOF) (T1) was longer in the desflurane group (68.4 +/- 11.1 min) than in the propofol group (60.2 +/- 9.4 min; p < 0.05). Time until recovery of 75% of the TOF-ratio was longer in the sevoflurane (96.8 +/- 13.1 min), desflurane (101.5 +/- 14.4 min) and isoflurane (94.1 +/- 13.9 min) groups than in the propofol group (83.7 +/- 1.3 min) (p < 0.0001).Times until recovery of T1 up to 1% were not statistically different: 45.8 +/- 10.7 (propofol), 50.6 +/- 11.0 (sevoflurane), 51.3 +/- 11.5 (desflurane) and 46.5 +/- 11.2 min (isoflurane). The 25% - 75% recovery index was also similar at 19.0 +/- 9.3 (propofol), 20.0 +/- 5.1 (sevoflurane), 25.7 +/- 12.4 (desflurane) and 20.9 +/- 7.9 (isoflurane). CONCLUSIONS: The inhaled anesthetics studied prolong the duration of clinical effect of cisatracurium more than does propofol.     

The effect of I‐gel™ airway on intraocular pressure in pediatric patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane during strabismus surgery

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of I‐gel^TM laryngeal mask airway on intraocular pressure (IOP) in children with strabismus undergoing balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane. Methods: Forty‐seven children, ASA physical status I, were scheduled for elective strabismus surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two inhalation anesthetic groups. Sevoflurane group comprised of 27 children, and desflurane group comprised of 20 children. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane or desflurane. No muscle relaxant was used. IOPs were measured before anesthesia, at 2 and 5 min after insertion of I‐gel^TM and after removal of I‐gel^TM. IOP measurements were obtained by Tonopen^®. Results: Intraocular pressure significantly decreased 2 min after insertion of I‐gel^TM in both sevoflurane and desflurane groups (P < 0.001). Measurements 5 min after I‐gel^TM insertion were also significantly lower than those of before insertion in both groups (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found between the preoperative measurement and the measurement after removal of I‐gel^TM within two groups (P = 0.072 and P = 0.547, respectively). No significant differences were found in all IOP measurements between sevoflurane and desflurane groups. Conclusion: Insertion of I‐gel^TM laryngeal mask airway with giving sevoflurane or desflurane inhalation anesthetics seemed not to cause any increase in IOPs in pediatric ophthalmic surgery.     

The recovery of cognitive function after general anesthesia in elderly patients: a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane.

We evaluated the cognitive recovery profiles in elderly patients after general anesthesia with desflurane or sevoflurane. After IRB approval, 70 ASA physical status I-III consenting elderly patients (> or =65 yr old) undergoing total knee or hip replacement procedures were randomly assigned to one of two general anesthetic groups. Propofol and fentanyl were administered for induction of anesthesia, followed by either desflurane 2%-4% or sevoflurane 1%-1.5% with nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen. The desflurane (2.5 +/- 0.6 MAC. h) and sevoflurane (2.7 +/- 0.5 MAC. h) concentrations were adjusted to maintain comparable depths of hypnosis using the electroencephalogram bispectral index monitor. The Mini-Mental State (MMS) test was used to assess cognitive function preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 24-h intervals. The use of desflurane was associated with a more rapid emergence from anesthesia (6.3 +/- 2.4 min versus 8.0 +/- 2.8 min) and a shorter length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (213 +/- 66 min versus 241 +/- 87 min). However, there were no significant differences between the Desflurane and the Sevoflurane groups when the MMS scores were compared preoperatively, and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h. Compared with the preoperative (baseline) MMS scores, the values were significantly decreased at 1 h postoperatively (27.8 +/- 1.7 versus 29.5 +/- 0.5 in the Desflurane group, and 27.4 +/- 1.7 versus 29.2 +/- 1.0 in the Sevoflurane group, respectively). However, the MMS scores returned to preoperative baseline levels within 6 h after surgery. At 1 h and 3 h after surgery, 51% and 11% (versus 57% and 9%) of patients in the Desflurane (versus Sevoflurane) Group experienced cognitive impairment. In conclusion, desflurane is associated with a faster early recovery than sevoflurane after general anesthesia in elderly patients. However, recovery of cognitive function was similar after desflurane and sevoflurane-based anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: Desflurane was associated with a faster early recovery than sevoflurane after general anesthesia in elderly patients. However, recovery of cognitive function was similar with both volatile anesthetics.     

Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia

We compared the recovery characteristics of remifentanil, desflurane, and sevoflurane when used for anesthesia in elective operative procedures. Sixty ASA physical status I and II patients, aged 18-65 yr, were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil-propofol, desflurane-N2O, or sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Before the induction of anesthesia, the patients of the desflurane and sevoflurane groups received fentanyl 2 microg/kg. In all groups, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained either with remifentanil 0.25 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), desflurane, or sevoflurane 0.85 MAC with 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve an adequate level of surgical anesthesia and to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline values. Early recovery times and a modified Aldrete Recovery Score > 9 were recorded. Trieger Dot Test and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) were performed the day before surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit to evaluate intermediate recovery. The remifentanil-propofol group had a significantly faster emergence than desflurane or sevoflurane, with no difference between both inhaled anesthetics. Thirty min after anesthesia administration, patients in the remifentanil-propofol and in the desflurane groups gave significantly more correct responses in the DSST compared with sevoflurane (remifentanil 87%, desflurane 83%, sevoflurane 56%), the impairment in the sevoflurane patients corresponding to the effects of a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.1% and, thus, being of clinical importance. Ninety minutes after anesthesia administration, no significant difference could be demonstrated among the groups in the DSST scores. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration. IMPLICATIONS: We compared awakening and intermediate recovery times after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia to desflurane-N2O and sevoflurane-N2O anesthesia. Emergence and return of cognitive function was significantly faster after remifentanil-propofol compared with desflurane and sevoflurane up to 60 min after anesthesia administration.     

七氟烷对QT间期延长的影响在老年人中更明显

背景七氟炕和氟哌利多能延长QT间期。高龄不仅与QT问期延长有关,它也是一种}j起药物诱导的QT间期延长的危险因素。本研究中,我们比较了七氟炕和氧哌利多对于矫正的QT（QYc）间期和心室复极化的传播（T波波峰至T波结束的时间间隔[Tp-e]）在老年患者和年轻患者中的差别。方法在七氟烷（1．5％-2．5％）麻醉和给予止吐剂量的氟哌利多（1．25rag）的30例老年患者（≥70岁）和30例年轻患者（20—69岁）中,测量2小时QT间期和代表心肌壁复极化传播的Tp—e间期。通过3种不同的公式使心率的QT间期标准化：Bazen公式、Matsunaga公式和Vandewa船公式。数据以均数±标准差表示。结果老年组的平均年龄比年轻组大24．4岁（P〈0．05）。两组的QTc间期在麻醉前没有明显的差异。通过3种公式计算发现七氟烷明显延长老年组患者的QTc间期（用Bazecc公式得出在麻醉前、使用七氟烷60分钟、75分钟、90分钟和120分钟时的QTc间期分别是0．434±0．028秒、0．450±0．037秒、0．463±0．037秒、0．461±0．037秒和0．461±O．038秒）。在老年组患者中七氟炕引起QTc间期延长的程度明显高于年轻组（用Bazecc公式计算吸入七氟烷60分钟时：0．450±0．037秒VS0．432±0．034秒;75分钟时：0．463±0．037秒vs0．441±0．037秒;120分钟时：0．461±0．038秒vs0．436±0．030秒）。但是七氟炕引起的QTc间期的延长既不随着时间的延长而延长也不被氟哌利多加重。两组中的Tp—e间期都没有受到影响。结论与年轻组相比,七氟烷引起老年组患者QTc间期的延长更加明显。尽管七氟烷不影响复极化的透壁传播,其引起的QTc闻期延长也不随着时间和给予氧哌利多而加重,但是老年患者在使用七氖烷麻醉期间仍要严密监测QT间期及其相关的心律失常。     

Absence of Bronchodilation during Desflurane Anesthesia: A Comparison to Sevoflurane and Thiopental

Background: Bronchospasm is a potential complication in anyone undergoing general anesthesia. Because volatile anesthetics relax bronchial smooth muscle, the effects of two newer volatile anesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane, on respiratory resistance were evaluated. The authors hypothesized that desflurane would have greater bronchodilating effects because of its ability to increase sympathetic nervous system activity.

Methods: Informed consent was obtained from patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. We recorded airway flow and pressure after thiopental induction and tracheal intubation (baseline) and for 10 min after beginning volatile anesthesia (~ 1 minimum alveolar concentration inspired). Respiratory system resistance was determined using the isovolume technique.

Results: Fifty subjects were randomized to receive sevoflurane (n = 20), desflurane (n = 20), or thiopental infusion (n = 10, 0.25 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1). There were no differences between groups for age, height, weight, smoking history, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class. On average, sevoflurane reduced respiratory resistance 15% below baseline, whereas both desflurane (+5%) and thiopental (+10%) did not decrease respiratory resistance. The respiratory resistance changes did not differ in patients with and without a history of smoking during sevoflurane or thiopental. In contrast, administration of desflurane to smokers resulted in the greatest increase in respiratory resistance.     

右美托咪啶对七氟醚麻醉患儿麻醉恢复期躁动的影响

目的 评价右美托咪啶对七氟醚麻醉患儿麻醉恢复期躁动的影响.方法 择期全麻下行耳鼻喉科手术患儿300例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,性别不限,年龄4～7岁,体重16～30 kg,采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为2组(n=150):对照组(C组)和右美托咪啶组(D组).D组麻醉诱导前经10min静脉输注0.5μg/kg右美托咪啶20 ml,C组输注生理盐水20 ml.给药结束后5 min时吸入8%七氟醚麻醉诱导,气管插管后行机械通气.吸人2%～ 3%七氟醚维持麻醉,术中维持BIS值40～60.记录麻醉恢复时间和术后2 h内躁动的发生情况.结果 与C组比较,D组麻醉恢复时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),躁动发生率降低(P<0.05).结论 右美托咪啶可降低七氟醚麻醉患儿麻醉恢复期躁动的发生.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on agitation during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Methods Three hundred ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ children, aged 4-7 yr, weighing 16-30kg, scheduled for elective ear-nose-throat operation under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into 2 groups ( n = 150 each) : control group (group C) and dexmedetomidine group (group D) . Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg in 20 ml was infused intravenously over 10 min before anesthesia induction in group D, while equal volume of normal Saline was infused in group C. Anesthesia was induced with inhalation of 8 % sevoflurane 5 min after the end of administration . The children were tracheal incubated and mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of 2 % -3 % sevoflurane. BIS was maintained at 40-60 during operation. The recovery time and agitation within 2 h after operation were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the recovery time between the two groups ( P > 0.05) . The incidence of agitation was significantly lower in group D than in group C ( P <0.05 ) . Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can reduce the occurrence of agitation during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in children.     

Cerebral hemodynamic response to the introduction of desflurane: A comparison with sevoflurane

Rapid increases in the inspired concentration of desflurane cause transient increases in heart rate and blood pressure. Desflurane also impairs cerebral autoregulation at clinical concentrations. Sevoflurane does not share these hemodynamic side effects. We compared the cerebral and systemic hemodynamic responses to the introduction of desflurane or sevoflurane after the induction of anesthesia with propofol. Twenty healthy adult patients scheduled for nonneurological surgery were recruited. After the induction of anesthesia with propofol, either desflurane or sevoflurane (n = 10 per group) was introduced at 7.2% or 2.2%, respectively, and increased to 10.8% or 3.3%, respectively, 2 min later. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity was measured continuously by using a 2-MHz transcranial Doppler ultrasound probe. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at 1-min intervals during the 12-min study period. Those patients receiving desflurane had significantly greater middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities, heart rates, and blood pressures than those receiving sevoflurane (P < 0.01). IMPLICATIONS: The introduction of desflurane after the induction of anesthesia leads to significant disturbances in cerebral and systemic hemodynamics suggesting loss of cerebral autoregulation and cerebral hyperemia. This may have implications for patients undergoing anesthesia for intracranial surgery.     

Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia: a comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental

BACKGROUND: Bronchospasm is a potential complication in anyone undergoing general anesthesia. Because volatile anesthetics relax bronchial smooth muscle, the effects of two newer volatile anesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane, on respiratory resistance were evaluated. The authors hypothesized that desflurane would have greater bronchodilating effects because of its ability to increase sympathetic nervous system activity. METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. We recorded airway flow and pressure after thiopental induction and tracheal intubation (baseline) and for 10 min after beginning volatile anesthesia ( approximately 1 minimum alveolar concentration inspired). Respiratory system resistance was determined using the isovolume technique. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were randomized to receive sevoflurane (n = 20), desflurane (n = 20), or thiopental infusion (n = 10, 0.25 mg. kg-1. h-1). There were no differences between groups for age, height, weight, smoking history, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class. On average, sevoflurane reduced respiratory resistance 15% below baseline, whereas both desflurane (+5%) and thiopental (+10%) did not decrease respiratory resistance. The respiratory resistance changes did not differ in patients with and without a history of smoking during sevoflurane or thiopental. In contrast, administration of desflurane to smokers resulted in the greatest increase in respiratory resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane causes moderate bronchodilation that is not observed with desflurane or sodium thiopental. The bronchoconstriction produced by desflurane was primarily noted in patients who currently smoked. (Key words: Bronchospasm; respiratory resistance; volatile anesthetics.)     

Emergence and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in morbidly obese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized study

We compared postoperative recovery after desflurane (n = 25) versus sevoflurane (n = 25) anesthesia in morbidly obese adults (body mass index >/=35) who underwent gastrointestinal bypass surgery via an open laparotomy. After premedication with midazolam and metoclopramide 1 h before surgery, epidural catheter placement, induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol, and tracheal intubation facilitated with succinylcholine, anesthesia was maintained with age-adjusted 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane or sevoflurane. Fentanyl IV, morphine or local anesthetics epidurally, and vasoactive drugs as needed were used to maintain arterial blood pressure at +/-20% of baseline value and to keep bispectral index of the electroencephalogram values between 40 to 60 U. Although patients were anesthetized with desflurane for a longer time (261 +/- 50 min versus 234 +/- 37 min, mean +/- sd; P < 0.05, desflurane versus sevoflurane, respectively) and for more MAC-hours (4.2 +/- 0.9 h versus 3.7 +/- 0.8 h; P < 0.05), significantly earlier recovery of response to command and tracheal extubation occurred in patients given desflurane than in patients given sevoflurane. The modified Aldrete score was greater in desflurane-anesthetized patients on admission to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (P = 0.01) but not at discharge (P = 0.47). On admission to PACU, patients given desflurane had higher oxygen saturations (97.0% +/- 2.4%) than patients given sevoflurane (94.8% +/- 4.4%, P = 0.035). Overall, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the use of antiemetics did not differ between the two anesthetic groups. We conclude that morbidly obese adult patients who underwent major abdominal surgery in a prospective, randomized study awoke significantly faster after desflurane than after sevoflurane anesthesia and the patients anesthetized with desflurane had higher oxygen saturation on entry to the PACU.     

Induction and maintenance characteristics of anesthesia with desflurane and nitrous oxide in infants and children.

To determine the induction and maintenance characteristics of desflurane in pediatric patients, the authors anesthetized 206 infants and children aged 1 month to 12 yr with nitrous oxide plus desflurane and/or halothane in oxygen. Patients were assigned to one of four groups: anesthesia was 1) induced and maintained with desflurane after premedication with an oral combination of meperidine, diazepam, and atropine; 2) induced and maintained with desflurane; 3) induced with halothane and maintained with desflurane; or 4) induced and maintained with halothane. An unblinded observer recorded time to loss of consciousness (lid reflex), time to intubation, and clinical characteristics of the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Moderate-to-severe laryngospasm (49%) and moderate-to-severe coughing (58%) occurred frequently during induction of anesthesia with desflurane; the incidence of these was not altered by premedication. In contrast, laryngospasm and coughing were rare during induction of anesthesia with halothane. In unpremedicated patients, time to loss of lid reflex (mean +/- SD) was similar for desflurane (2.4 +/- 1.2 min) and halothane (2.1 +/- 0.8 min). During induction of anesthesia, before laryngoscopy and intubation, mean arterial pressure less than 80% of baseline was more common with halothane; heart rate and mean arterial pressure greater than 120% of baseline were more common with desflurane. Intraoperatively, heart rate greater than 120% of baseline was more common with desflurane; blood pressures were similar for the two anesthetics. The authors conclude that the high incidence of airway complications during induction of anesthesia with desflurane limits its utility for inhalation induction in pediatric patients. Anesthesia can be safely maintained with desflurane if induced with a different anesthetic.     

Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics

PURPOSE: To compare the induction and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anesthesia induced with either propofol or sevoflurane in pediatric outpatients. METHODS: Fifty-two children, aged 1-3 yr, presenting for ambulatory adenoidectomy were randomly allocated to receive 3 mg.kg-1 propofol i.v. or sevoflurane 8% inspired concentration for induction of anesthesia. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.2 mg.kg-1 mivacurium. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide/oxygen (FiO2 0.3) and sevoflurane approximately 3-5% inspired concentration with controlled ventilation. Intubation was assessed by an anesthetist blinded to the induction method. Recovery characteristics were compared using the modified Aldrete scoring system, the Pain/Discomfort scale and measuring specific recovery times. A postoperative questionnaire was used to evaluate the children's well-being at home. RESULTS: Intubating conditions were similar in both groups. Emergence from anesthesia occurred earlier with sevoflurane for induction than with propofol (11 +/- 4 vs 17 +/- 7 min (mean +/- SD), P = 0.0002). More children in the sevoflurane group achieved full points on the modified Aldrete scoring system during the first 20 min after anesthesia (P < 0.05). However, children in the sevoflurane group scored higher in the Pain/Discomfort scale at 10 min after anesthesia (P = 0.04) and were given postoperative analgesics earlier than children in the propofol group (13 +/- 5 min vs 18 +/- 11 min, P = 0.03). The time to meet discharge criteria and recovery at home were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of sevoflurane anesthesia with propofol for day-case adenoidectomy results in longer, but more calm, early recovery but does not delay discharge or affect recovery at home.     

Effects of magnesium sulphate on atrioventricular conduction times and surface electrocardiogram in dogs anaesthetized with sevoflurane

We have studied the effects of magnesium on atrioventricular (AV) conduction times and surface electrocardiogram during both sinus rhythm and atrial pacing in seven dogs anaesthetized with 1 MAC of sevoflurane. A bolus dose of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) 30, 60 and 90 mg kg-1 significantly increased plasma magnesium concentrations from 1.3 (SEM 0.1) to 15.3 (1.3) mg dl-1. MgSO4 significantly prolonged A-H (AV nodal conduction time during sinus rhythm), St-H (intra-atrial and AV nodal conduction time during atrial pacing) and H-S (total ventricular conduction time) intervals at doses > or = 30 mg kg-1 ; H-V interval (His-Purkinje conduction time) at doses > or = 60 mg kg-1; RR and PR intervals and QRS duration at doses > or = 30 mg kg-1 in a dose- related manner during both sinus rhythm and atrial pacing. QTc interval remained unchanged during sinus rhythm. The doses of MgSO4 used did not have deleterious effects on AV conduction times and surface electrocardiogram during 1 MAC of sevoflurane anaesthesia. This finding suggests that MgSO4 in high doses was safe and may be indicated for cardiac arrhythmia and hypertension during sevoflurane anaesthesia. However, further study is required to apply these findings to clinical anaesthesia.