Defects in mouse nephrogenesis induced by selective and non-selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Deletion of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene causes impairment of kidney development, but the effect of selective inhibitors of COX-2 (coxibs) or the non-selective inhibitors of COX (the classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; NSAIDs) on kidney development was less well described.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We assessed the effects of equipotent analgesic doses of celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib and of the NSAIDs, diclofenac and naproxen, on postpartum kidney development in mice, from postnatal day 1 (P1) to P21.

KEY RESULTS

All the COX inhibitors, at the doses used, blocked COX-2 activity by more than 80% as assayed by PGE₂ synthesis in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse blood samples. Rofecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib exerted the most marked impairment of postpartum kidney development, demonstrated by attenuation of kidney growth, reduction in size of glomeruli, increase in immature superficial glomeruli, thinning of subcapsular cortical mass and reduction in size of juxtamedullary glomeruli. These defects were less severe than those in kidneys from COX-2^−/− mice. Administration of diclofenac and naproxen revealed renal defects similar to those after coxib treatment, but both NSAIDs induced greater arrest of immature superficial glomeruli in the outer cortex and increased the number of undifferentiated proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells. Treatment with celecoxib or valdecoxib caused only minimal changes in renal morphology.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Classical NSAIDs cause similar or even stronger nephrodysgenesis than the coxibs. Also, the ranking of coxibs regarding adverse effects on renal development, using equi-analgesic doses, is rofecoxib = etoricoxib = lumiracoxib > valdecoxib > celecoxib.     

Clinical pharmacology of novel selective COX-2 inhibitors

Novel coxibs (i.e. etoricoxib, valdecoxib, parecoxib and lumiracoxib) with enhanced biochemical cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selectivity over that of rofecoxib and celecoxib have been recently developed. They have the potential advantage to spare COX-1 activity, thus reducing gastrointestinal toxicity, even when administered at high doses to improve efficacy. They are characterized by different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics features. The higher biochemical selectivity of valdecoxib than celecoxib, evidenced in vitro, may be clinically relevant leading to an improved gastrointestinal safety. Interestingly, parecoxib, a pro-drug of valdecoxib, is the only injectable coxib. Etoricoxib shows only a slightly improved COX-2 selectivity than rofecoxib, a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor that has been reported to halve the incidence of serious gastrointestinal toxicity compared to nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Lumiracoxib, the most selective COX-2 inhibitor in vitro, is the only acidic coxib. The hypothesis that this chemical property may lead to an increased and persistent drug accumulation in inflammatory sites and consequently to an improved clinical efficacy, however, remains to be verified. Several randomized clinical studies suggest that the novel coxibs have comparable efficacy to nonselective NSAIDs in the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and acute pain, but they share similar renal side-effects. The apparent dose-dependence of renal toxicity may limit the use of higher doses of the novel coxibs for improved efficacy. Large-size randomized clinical trials are ongoing to define the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety of the novel coxibs.     

Risk of myocardial infarction associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs). METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using a fixed-effect model to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for risk of MI associated with coxibs compared against placebo, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other coxibs. RESULTS: Fifty-five trials (99 087 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled OR for MI risk for any coxib compared against placebo was 1.46 (95%CI: 1.02, 2.09). We found celecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib, valdecoxib and lumiracoxib were associated with higher MI risks compared against placebo. The pooled OR for any coxib compared against other NSAIDs was 1.45 (95%CI: 1.09, 1.93). Rofecoxib had a significantly higher risk of MI than naproxen (OR: 5.39; 95%: 2.08, 14.02) and valdecoxib had lower MI risk than diclofenac (OR: 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03, 0.73). There were no significant differences identified in the risk of MI from the available head-to-head comparisons of coxibs. CONCLUSIONS: Coxibs were associated with increased risks of MI when compared against placebo or non-selective NSAIDs. Differences in MI risk were also apparent between comparisons of individual NSAIDs. Future work should consider using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to explore differences in MI risk between different subgroups of patients.     

Clinical use and pharmacological properties of selective COX-2 inhibitors

Selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) are approved for the relief of acute pain and symptoms of chronic inflammatory conditions such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They have similar pharmacological properties but a slightly improved gastrointestinal (GI) safety profile if compared to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs). However, long-term use of coxibs can be associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs). For this reason, two coxibs were withdrawn from the market. Currently celecoxib, etoricoxib, and lumiracoxib are used. These three coxibs differ in their chemical structure and selectivity for COX-2, which might explain some of their pharmacological features. Following oral administration, the less lipophilic celecoxib has a lower bioavailability (20–40%) than the other two coxibs (74–100%). All are eliminated by hepatic metabolism involving mainly CYP2C9 (celecoxib, lumiracoxib) and CYP3A4 (etoricoxib). Elimination half-life varies from 5 to 8 h (lumiracoxib), 11 to 16 h (celecoxib) and 19 to 32 h (etoricoxib). In patients with liver disease, plasma levels of celecoxib and etoricoxib are increased about two-fold. Clinical efficacies of the coxibs are comparable to tNSAIDs. There is an ongoing discussion about whether the slightly better GI tolerability (which is lost if acetylsalicylic acid is coadministered) of the coxibs is offset by their elevated risks for CV AEs (also seen with tNSAIDs other than naproxen), which apparently increase with dose and duration of exposure. In addition, the higher costs for coxibs (if compared to tNSAIDs, even when a “gastroprotective” proton pump inhibitor is coadministered) should be taken into consideration, if a coxib will be selected for certain patients with a high risk for GI complications. For such treatment, the lowest effective dose should be used for a limited time. Monitoring of kidney function and blood pressure appears advisable. It is hoped that further controlled studies can better define the therapeutic place of the coxibs.     

The biochemical selectivity of novel COX-2 inhibitors in whole blood assays of COX-isozyme activity

We have evaluated the biochemical selectivity of novel cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, etoricoxib, valdecoxib, DFU and DFP, vs rofecoxib and celecoxib, using the human whole blood assays of COX-isozyme activity, in vitro. Compounds were incubated with human whole blood samples, allowed to clot for 1 h at 37 degrees C, or stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (10 microg/ml) for 24 h at 37 degrees C. Serum thromboxane (TX) B2 and plasma prostaglandin (PG) E2 levels were measured by specific radioimmunoassays as indices of platelet COX-1 and monocyte COX-2 activity, respectively. Valdecoxib, etoricoxib, DFU and DFP inhibited platelet COX-1 and monocyte COX-2 with the following COX-1/COX-2 IC50 ratios: 61.5, 344, 660 and 1918, respectively. The reference compounds, celecoxib and rofecoxib had corresponding values of 29.6 and 272. In conclusion, a second wave of COX-2 inhibitors with higher biochemical selectivity than the existing coxibs has been developed. Whether their administration will be associated with improved clinical efficacy and/or safety vis-à-vis celecoxib and rofecoxib remains to be established.     

The Biochemical Selectivity of Novel COX-2 Inhibitors in Whole Blood Assays of COX-isozyme Activity

Summary

We have evaluated the biochemical selectivity of novel cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors, etoricoxib, valdecoxib, DFU and DFP, vs rofecoxib and celecoxib, using the human whole blood assays of COX-isozyme activity, in vitro. Compounds were incubated with human whole blood samples, allowed to clot for 1?h at 37°C, or stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (10|ig/ml) for 24?h at 37°C. Serum thromboxane (TX) B2 and plasma prostaglandin (PG) E2 levels were measured by specific radioimmunoassays as indices of platelet COX-1 and monocyte COX-2 activity, respectively. Valdecoxib, etoricoxib, DFU

and DFP inhibited platelet COX-1 and monocyte COX-2 with the following COX-1/COX-2 IC50 ratios: 61.5, 344, 660 and 1918, respectively. The reference compounds, celecoxib and rofecoxib had corresponding values of 29.6 and 272. In conclusion, a second wave of COX-2 inhibitors with higher biochemical selectivity than the existing coxibs has been developed. Whether their administration will be associated with improved clinical efficacy and/or safety visà-vis celecoxib and rofecoxib remains to be established.     

Comparison of reporting of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in association with selective COX-2 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are closely related severe acute life-threatening, drug-induced skin disorders. The US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (AERS) has received reports of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of the recently introduced selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor NSAIDs, two of which are also sulfonamides. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to review cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported to the FDA associated with the use of the selective COX-2 inhibitor NSAIDs celecoxib, rofecoxib and valdecoxib, and to compare reporting rates of the two conditions associated with these drugs to each other, meloxicam (an oxicam NSAID that came on the US market at a similar time) and the background incidence rate. METHODS: We reviewed all US cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported to the FDA AERS database associated with the use of celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib and meloxicam since these agents were first marketed. We utilised AERS and drug use data to calculate reporting rates for each drug after the first 2 years of marketing. We obtained the background rate from the medical literature. RESULTS: Up to the end of March 2004, there were 63 cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis reported with valdecoxib use, 43 with celecoxib, 17 with rofecoxib (the non-sulfonamide coxib) and none for meloxicam. In the first 2 years of marketing the reporting rate for Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis with valdecoxib was 49 cases per million person-years of use, 6 cases per million person-years for celecoxib and 3 cases per million person-years for rofecoxib. The reporting rates for the sulfonamide coxibs were substantially higher than the background rate of 1.9 cases per million population per year, with the valdecoxib rate being 8-9 times that of celecoxib and approximately 25 times that of the background rate. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis and the use of the sulfonamide COX-2 inhibitors, particularly valdecoxib. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of this serious life-threatening event when prescribing these drugs and advise patients to discontinue use at the earliest possible sign or symptom.     

Systematic review: coxibs,non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or no cyclooxygenase inhibitors in gastroenterological high‐risk patients?

Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have been marketed as alternatives of conventional, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with the purpose of reducing/eliminating the risk of ulcer complications. Unexpectedly, randomized-controlled trials revealed that long-term use of coxibs, such as rofecoxib, significantly increased the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, while the use of valdecoxib was associated with potentially life-threatening skin reactions. Subsequently, rofecoxib and valdecoxib were withdrawn from the market. Although more strict precautions for other coxibs, such as celecoxib, etoricoxib, lumiracoxib and parecoxib, may be accepted/recommended by regulatory agencies, a critical review of published data suggests that their use may not be justified - even in high-risk patients - taking benefits, costs and risks into consideration. Clinicians should, therefore, never prescribe coxibs to patients with cardiovascular risk factors, and should only reluctantly prescribe coxibs to patients with a history of ulcer disease or dyspepsia to overcome persistent pain due to, e.g. rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Instead, they should consider using conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in combination with a proton pump inhibitor or a prostaglandin analogue, especially for patients with increased cardiovascular risks, i.e. established ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and/or peripheral arterial disease, or alternatively acetaminophen. An evidence-based algorithm for treatment of a chronic arthritis patient with one or more gastrointestinal risk factors is presented.     

Clinical implications of drug interactions with coxibs

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) often are prescribed to patients who are taking concomitant drugs. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (coxibs) rofecoxib and celecoxib are highly selective inhibitors of COX-2, differentiating them from nonselective NSAIDs, which substantially inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2. Like nonselective NSAIDs, coxibs are hepatically metabolized: rofecoxib primarily by reduction by cytosolic enzymes and celecoxib by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Because rofecoxib is not significantly metabolized by CYP, it has fewer confirmed or potential drug interactions than celecoxib. However, potent inducers of CYP, such as rifampin, may decrease rofecoxib concentrations because of induction of general hepatic metabolic activity. Celecoxib is metabolized by CYP2C9 and may be increased or decreased by CYP2C9 modifiers. It also inhibits CYP2D6 and may affect concentrations of CYP2D6 substrates. Similar to NSAIDs, many pharmacodynamic interactions involving coxibs are related to inhibition of production of renal prostaglandins. However, coxibs have no antiplatelet activity and may be preferred to NSAIDs in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Nonetheless, when a potential for an interaction exists, standard monitoring is recommended when starting or discontinuing a coxib. Due to lack of data to support these interactions, which are primarily theoretical, additional studies are necessary to establish the drug interaction profiles of coxibs.     

COX-2 inhibitors and arterial hypertension: an analysis of spontaneous case reports in the Pharmacovigilance database

Objective To evaluate the main characteristics of case reports of arterial hypertension (AH) related to COX-2 inhibitor (coxib) use in real-life practice.Methods This study was based on spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) submitted to the French Pharmacovigilance system. Associations between AH and the different groups of those using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs: rofecoxib, celecoxib and non-selective NSAIDs) were compared using calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results In France, between 1 April 2000 and 30 November 2003, 34 AH cases related to coxibs were reported. Case reports include predominantly patients older than 65 years, with a previous story of essential AH. Most AH (60%) occurred during the first 15 days of treatment. The AH was reported significantly more frequently for rofecoxib than celecoxib. The OR for development of AH with rofecoxib versus celecoxib was 3.3 (1.6–6.9). The AH was also reported more frequently with coxib (2.8%) than with non-selective NSAID (0.5%) use, OR = 5.9 (3.8–9.0).Conclusion This study shows that coxibs are associated with a risk of AH in real-life practice. More spontaneous reports of AH to the French Pharmacovigilance system concern rofecoxib than celecoxib (and coxibs than non-selective NSAIDs). This ADR is of special epidemiological importance due to both the risks of AH and the large use of coxibs.     

选择性COX-2抑制剂的心血管安全性评价

目的：研究以罗非昔布、塞来昔布、伐地昔布、鲁米昔布为代表的选择性COX-2抑制剂在临床应用的安全性。方法：查询国内外相关文献资料并结合临床实践进行回顾性研究。结果：罗非昔布、塞来昔布、伐地昔布、鲁米昔布等都有增加心血管不良事件的危险,同时罗非昔布的心血管风险要高于塞来昔布。结论：心血管危险是COX-2抑制剂的“类效应”,所以在临床应用这类药物时．应当加强合理的监管措施;仍需对COX-2抑制剂在心血管系统的安全性进行深入研究。     

第二代环氧酶-2特异性抑制剂的研究进展

为降低NSAIDs类药物的典型胃肠道不良反应，人们开发了选择性更高的第二代环氧酶-2(COX-2)特异性抑制剂。已开发的代表性化合物有戊地昔布、帕瑞昔布、依地昔布和氯美昔布等。临床试验证实，这些药物具有可靠的抗炎和止痛作用，其中帕瑞昔布作为第一个注射用NSAIDs类药物，可用于治疗手术后疼痛。本文综述该领域的研究进展。     

Gastroduodenal safety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) derived eicosanoids promote gastroprotective mucosal defenses and induce platelet aggregation. By sparing COX-1, COX-2 specific inhibitors provide effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity while substantially reducing the risk of peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding compared to dual COX inhibitors (traditional NSAIDs). Clinical studies of the COX-2-selective inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy equivalent to nonselective NSAIDs with significantly lower rates of GI toxicity. The incidence of endoscopic ulcers in some studies with coxibs has approximated placebo. However, as the detection of endoscopic lesions is not always correlated with symptomatic ulcers and ulcer complications, outcome studies of GI safety were performed. The results of large outcome studies have evaluated rofecoxib and celecoxib in over 39,000 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Results of these studies showed that patients taking a supratherapeutic dose of rofecoxib or celecoxib had significantly lower rates of GI-related adverse events than those taking a nonselective NSAID. The GI safety of coxibs for patients using low dose aspirin concomitantly with a coxib appears to be reduced, particularly with regard to ulcer complications. Such data provide support for the COX-2 hypothesis and demonstrate that coxibs provide effective treatment of pain and inflammation with a reduced risk of gastropathy.     

Clinical pharmacology of lumiracoxib, a second-generation cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitor

Although highly selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been shown to be less toxic to the gastrointestinal tract than conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), their overall safety profile is questioned. Since different selective COX-2 inhibitors were found to be associated with increased cardiovascular thrombotic events, the thrombotic hazard may be a class effect. Furthermore, warnings have been issued regarding serious skin and hypersensitivity reactions associated with valdecoxib. Lumiracoxib is a novel COX-2 selective inhibitor (coxib) with improved biochemical selectivity over that of currently available coxibs. It is structurally distinct from other drugs in the class and has weakly acidic properties. Clinical studies support a once-daily dosing regimen, despite its relatively short plasma elimination half-life (3 - 6 h). In randomised, controlled clinical trials, lumiracoxib 100 - 200 mg/day has been shown to be superior to placebo in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis, with clinical efficacy similar to diclofenac 150 mg/day, celecoxib 200 mg/day or rofecoxib 25 mg/day. Furthermore, lumiracoxib 200 - 400 mg/day appeared to be effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In patients with acute pain related to primary dysmenorrhoea, dental or orthopaedic surgery, lumiracoxib 400 mg/day was found to be at least as effective as standard doses of traditional NSAIDs and other coxibs. Endoscopic studies have indicated that lumiracoxib is associated with a rate of gastroduodenal ulcer formation that is significantly lower than with ibuprofen and does not differ from celecoxib. In the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Trial, which enrolled 18,325 patients with osteoarthritis, the cumulative 1-year incidence of ulcer complications (primary end point) was significantly reduced by approximately threefold on lumiracoxib 400 mg/day compared with naproxen 1000 mg/day or ibuprofen 2400 mg/day (0.32 versus 0.91%). Reduction in ulcer complications was more pronounced in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (0.2 versus 0.92%, respectively). Conversely, the gastrointestinal advantage of lumiracoxib was abrogated in patients receiving low-dose aspirin (0.69 versus 0.88%, respectively, p = 0.49). Regarding cardiovascular events contributing to the trialists' composite end point (myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death), there was no significant difference between lumiracoxib (0.65%) versus combined comparator NSAIDs (0.55%). Similarly, no significant difference was recorded in rates of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) between the lumiracoxib (0.25%) and the combined NSAID (0.19%) treatment groups. Liver function test abnormalities were more frequent with lumiracoxib (2.57%) than with the comparator NSAIDs (0.63%). Whether or not this would result in an increased risk of clinical hepatitis in the real world setting is unforeseeable.     

Novel insights and therapeutical applications in the field of inhibitors of COX-2

The discovery of the two isoenzymes COX-1 and COX-2 and the knowledge of their function, localisation and regulation has initiated the development of COX-2 selective inhibitors (coxibs). Inducible COX-2 at the peripheral site of inflammation has been detected in the early 1990s, the involvement of recently detected spinal COX-2 has led to new insights into mechanisms of pain and may explain analgesic and antipyretic properties of COX-2 selective inhibitors. The coxibs rofecoxib and celecoxib have been introduced into therapy and seem to offer some advantages over the classical non-selective NSAIDs. The search for new COX-2 inhibitors is going on, the development of etoricoxib and lumiracoxib is a step ahead concerning efficacy, tolerability and safety. Until today COX-2 selective inhibitors have found their place in therapy of arthritis, osteoarthritis, dysmenorrhea and acute pain. A new paradigm in pain therapy seems to justify their use in perioperative settings in a preemptive or multimodal therapeutical strategy. In the future COX-2 selective inhibitors as opioid sparing agents could become an important tool in pain therapy. Even a therapeutical benefit of COX-2 selective inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease or in the prevention or treatment of colorectal or prostate cancer is presently intensely investigated. Recently some authors reported on COX-3, a splicing variant of COX-1. If COX-3 really represents the target for acetaminophen must be called into question.     

Update on cyclooxygenase inhibitors: has a third COX isoform entered the fray?

It has been more than 30 years since Sir John Vane first reported that the pharmacological actions of aspirin-like drugs could be explained by their ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX). Since then, a second isoform of COX, named COX-2, has been discovered and highly selective inhibitors of this isoform have been marketed. Most recently, a splice variant of COX-1 mRNA, retaining intron 1, and given the names COX-3, COX-1b or COX-1v, has been described. Non-selective NSAIDs such as ibuprofen and naproxen, which inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2, have proven highly effective and safe in the short-term management of acute pain. Highly selective COX-2 inhibitors including celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, lumiracoxib, and etoricoxib were developed with the hope of significantly reducing the serious gastrointestinal toxicities associated with chronic high-dose NSAID use. While long-term studies demonstrated that rofecoxib and lumiracoxib reduced the incidence of GI perforations, ulcerations and bleeds by approximately 60% compared to non-selective NSAIDs, recent reports also demonstrated that the chronic use of rofecoxib and celecoxib in arthritis and colorectal polyp patients, and the short-term use of parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery, resulted in a significant increase in serious cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke compared to naproxen or placebo. COX-3 mRNA has been isolated in many tissues including canine and human cerebral cortex, human aorta, and rodent cerebral endothelium, heart, kidney and neuronal tissues. In transfected insect cells, canine COX-3 protein is expressed and was selectively inhibited by acetaminophen. However, in humans and rodents an acetaminophen sensitive COX-3 protein is not expressed because the retention of intron-1 adds 94 and 98 nucleotides to the COX-3 mRNA structure respectively. Since the genetic code is a triplicate code (3 nucleotides to form one amino acid), the retention of the intron in both species results in a frame shift in the RNA message and the production of a truncated protein with a completely different amino acid sequence than COX-1 or COX-2 lacking acetaminophen sensitivity. Advances made through a combination of basic molecular biological and pharmacological techniques, and well designed randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that the apparent gastrointestinal advantage of selective COX-2 inhibitors appears to be outweighed by their potential for cardiovascular toxicity and that acetaminophen's analgesic and antipyretic effects do not involve the inhibition of the COX-1 splice variant protein, putative COX-3.     

Can drug removals involving cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors be avoided? A plea for human pharmacology

Within the past 20 years many cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors were removed for unwanted drug effects shortly after entering the drug market (e.g. benoxaprofen and isoxicam), whereas others (e.g. diclofenac and ibuprofen) were not. This has continued with the suspension of the sale of the COX-2 inhibitors rofecoxib, valdecoxib and lumiracoxib, whereas others (e.g. celecoxib and etoricoxib) are still available. All these compounds share the same molecular mode of action but differ considerably in their pharmacokinetics. Determination of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships should help to pinpoint deficits, answer pending questions and lead to a safer drug use. Here, we provide evidence that applying the ex vivo human whole-blood assay could provide a valuable tool for defining the lowest effective dose and the adequate dosing interval of COX inhibitors. In our opinion, such an approach could reduce unwanted drug effects and obviate drug removals.     

Dual carbonic anhydrase--cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

Cyclooxygenase is a key enzyme responsible for metabolisation of arachidonic acid into prostaglandins and thromboxane. This enzyme is the target of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), used against inflammation and pain. The inducible COX-2 was associated with inflammatory conditions, whereas the constitutive form (COX-1) was responsible for the beneficial effects of the PGs. This observation led to the development of COX-2 inhibitors or "coxibs" of which rofecoxib (Vioxx) characterized by a methylsulfone moiety and the sulfonamides celecoxib (Celebrex) and valdecoxib (Bextra). Initially described as COX-2 "selective" inhibitors, recent reports revealed a nanomolar inhibition activity of the sulfonamide COX-2 inhibitors for several carbonic anhydrase (CA) isoforms, confirmed by X-ray crystal structures for the adducts of celecoxib and valdecoxib with isozyme CA II. This dual activity may help to explain differences in clinical observation between sulfonamide and methylsulfone COX-2 inhibitors. Moreover, the inhibition of CA isozymes, critical for the development and invasion of cancer cells, such as CA II, IX and XII, may constitute an important mechanism of antitumor action of such sulfonamide compounds.     

A mechanistic perspective on the specificity and extent of COX-2 inhibition in pregnancy.

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors form one of the most commonly prescribed groups of pain relief drugs. Despite the known reproductive toxicity of NSAIDs, which are nonspecific COX inhibitors, little is known about the differential role between COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition on reproduction. It has been suggested that COX-2 plays a prominent role in animals at all stages of reproduction, from ovulation to implantation to decidualisation and delivery. Both estrogen and progesterone have been shown to be involved in regulation of COX production in tissues of the reproductive tract. Similar to NSAIDs, warnings on reproduction have been included in the product labelling of marketed COX-2-specific inhibitors. Variations in the level of warnings in these labels are noted, with an order of stringency being celecoxib approximate, equals etoricoxib > rofecoxib approximate, equals valdecoxib. The specificity of etoricoxib for COX-2 has been found to be approximately 3-fold greater than that of rofecoxib and valdecoxib and approximately 14-fold more than celecoxib in human whole blood assays. There is growing evidence to suggest that the inducible COX-2, rather than the COX-1, is the main enzyme responsible for reproduction. It was demonstrated that the change in estrogen and progesterone levels during pregnancy contributes to the dramatic increase in COX-2 expression. This further strengthens the earlier findings that COX-2 activities are necessary to support pregnancy. It is also worth mentioning that although a definite correlation between the specificity of a COX-2-specific inhibitor and the level of precaution stated in the drug labels in UK was not obtained, a direct relationship between the specificity and the potential to result in teratogenicity has not been excluded. With growing interest of the pharmaceutical industry in developing more COX-2-specific inhibitors and the fact that reproductive toxicity is not tested in pregnant women before marketing, it is important for drug regulators to raise awareness of the potential reproductive adverse effects and provide guidance on the level of caution when using these drugs in pregnancy.