Performance of a dual-chamber implantable defibrillator algorithm for discrimination of ventricular from supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate therapies remain a major problem in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Decreasing the proportion of inappropriate therapies is a major objective. With the addition of atrial detection and advanced algorithms, dual-chamber ICDs are designed to offer better discrimination of ventricular (VT) and supraventricular (SVT) arrhythmias. The present multicentre, open study aimed to evaluate the performance of a dual-chamber detection algorithm, the Atrial View algorithm, incorporated in a dual-chamber ICD, the Ventak AV (Guidant Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, USA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (45 males, 62+/-11 years, ejection fraction 42+/-15%) with standard indications received a Ventak AV ICD which analyzes, within the VT zone RR stability, tachycardia onset, atrial rate and AV relationship. Predischarge enhanced-detection algorithms were prospectively programmed: stability 24 ms, onset 9%, atrial fibrillation threshold 200 beats/min, and Vrate>Arate. An additional sustained rate duration criterion was programmed at least at 30 s. ICDs were interrogated every 3 months or when patients received shocks. A blinded review of electrograms for arrhythmia diagnosis and appropriateness of therapy was performed by 2 experts. Over the follow-up period (12+/-3.6 months), a total of 400 tachycardia episodes was recorded within the VT zone. After the review of stored electrograms, 237 (59%) true positive, 143 (36%) true negative, 17 (4%) false positive and 3 (1%) false negative episodes were diagnosed. Considering the 3 VTs incorrectly detected by the detection algorithms, therapy was delivered in 2 cases after sustained rate duration and 1 VT reverted spontaneously. Inappropriate therapy occurred in 17 cases. All but 1 were related to SVT with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship. Finally, on a per episode basis, the detection algorithm sensitivity was 99% and specificity was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of detection criteria based on stability, onset, atrial fibrillation rate threshold and Vrate>Arate allows a 99% sensitivity and an 89% specificity in Guidant ICDs. Discrimination of SVT with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship, however, remains a challenge for which new algorithms have to be designed.     

Efficacy and safety of the initial use of stability and onset criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate therapies are the most frequent adverse event in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Most ICDs offer a stability criterion to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from atrial fibrillation and an onset criterion to discriminate VT from sinus tachycardia. The efficacy and safety of these criteria, if used immediately after implantation, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a case control study, 87 patients in whom stability and onset criteria had been activated immediately after ICD implantation were matched to 87 patients in whom these criteria had not been activated. The groups were matched for known predictors of inappropriate therapies. With stability and onset criteria off, 24 patients (28%) received inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation (n = 14) or sinus tachycardia (n = 11); with stability and onset on, only 11 patients (13%) were treated by the ICD due to atrial fibrillation (n = 5) or sinus tachycardia (n = 7) (log rank: P = 0.029). Five patients suffered inappropriate therapies despite the fact that onset (n = 4) or stability (n = 1) criteria were not fulfilled once tachycardias continued for a prespecified duration. Only one patient experienced a failure to detect VT due to the onset criterion; none because of stability. CONCLUSION: The immediate use of stability and onset criteria after ICD implantation reduces inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia. Because of the potential for underdetection of VT, this approach should be limited to tachycardia rates hemodynamically tolerated by the patient.     

Initial clinical experience with a new arrhythmia detection algorithm in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

AIM: Inappropriate therapy, due to poor discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains a major problem in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Theoretically, the addition of atrial sensing in discrimination algorithms should improve this differentiation. The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of a new tachycardia discrimination algorithm, SMART Detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a non-thoracotomy ICD system (Phylax AV, Biotronik, Germany). All documented spontaneous arrhythmia episodes were analyzed. During a mean follow-up of 8 months, a total number of 139 events with stored electrograms were recorded in 12 patients. The final diagnosis was ventricular fibrillation (VF) or polymorphic VT (n=20), monomorphic VT (n=69), SVT (n=26), other ventricular arrhythmia (n=3) and T wave oversensing (n=21). In 6 episodes a dual tachycardia was present. Considering SVT episodes, inappropriate therapy occurred in 2 cases of atrial flutter due to stable ventricular rate (<30 ms), 1 case of atrial tachycardia and 2 cases of sinus tachycardia due to a sudden onset (> 10%). CONCLUSION: With the SMART Detection algorithm, discrimination of VT from SVT achieved a sensitivity of 100%, with an accuracy of 95.6% for all ventricular arrhythmias. In the case of SVT, the algorithm appropriately detected and inhibited therapy in 88% of atrial fibrillation.     

Enhanced Detection Criteria in Implantable Defibrillators

Enhanced Tachycardia Detection Algorithm introduction: Enhanced detection criteria in third-generation implantable defibrillators have been implemented to avoid inappropriate therapy of fast supraventricular arrhythmias. We prospectively analyzed the use of these criteria in patients with an implantable defibrillator with electrogram storing capability. Methods and Results: In 82 consecutive patients with a Guidant-CPI implantable defibrillator, sudden onset > 9% and stability < 40 msec were systematically programmed in zone 1 of therapy together with a sustained rate duration security mechanism. All detected tachycardia episodes were analyzed. The study population consisted of 59 patients who had at least one episode of tachycardia detected in zone 1 during follow-up. The tachycardia rate in zone 1 never exceeded 210 beats/min. Twenty patients had no episodes during follow-up, and three patients had episodes detected exclusively in zone 2 of therapy. Supraventricular arrhythmias were detected frequently in the ventricular tachycardia zone (193 of 690 tachycardia episodes in 23 of 59 patients). Use of sudden onset was very effective in detecting sinus tachycardias (65 of 67 episodes), and stability was very useful in detecting atrial fibrillation (31 of 32 episodes). However, sensitivity in detecting ventricular tachycardia was only 90% (451 of 497 episodes). Application of the sustained rate duration criterion allowed appropriate treatment of all ventricular tachycardia episodes, increasing sensitivity to 100%; however, specificity in appropriate non-treatment of supraventricular decreased from 96% to 83%. Subsequent analysis of different algorithms applied to our data showed that sudden onset > 9% and stability < 40 msec was the algorithm with the best specificity and sensitivity. Conclusion: Programming sudden onset and stability detection criteria with a sustained rate duration safety net for triggering tachycardia therapy results in appropriate device management in most patients with supraventricular and slow (< 210 beats/min) ventricular tachycardias.     

Discrimination of ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia by a downloaded wavelet-transform morphology algorithm: a paradigm for development of implantable cardioverter defibrillator detection algorithms

INTRODUCTION: Present implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have algorithms that discriminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from ventricular tachycardia (VT). One type of algorithm is based on differences in morphology of ventricular electrograms during VT and SVT. Prior SVT-VT discrimination algorithms have not undergone real-time evaluation in ambulatory patients until they were incorporated permanently into ICDs. This approach may result in incomplete testing of electrogram morphology algorithms because they are influenced by posture, activity, and electrogram maturation. We downloaded software into implanted ICDs to study a novel algorithm that compares morphologies of baseline and tachycardia electrograms based on differences between corresponding coefficients of their wavelet transforms. This comparison is expressed as a match-percent score. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 23 patients, we downloaded the wavelet algorithm into implanted ICDs to assess the temporal and postural stability of baseline electrograms as measured by this algorithm and its accuracy for SVT-VT discrimination. Median follow-up was 6 months. Software was downloaded into all ICDs without altering other device functions. With few exceptions, percent template match in baseline rhythm was stable with changes in body position, rest versus walking, isometric exercise, and over time (1 and 3 months). Using the nominal match-percent threshold of 70%, sensitivity for detection of 38 VTs was 100%. Specificity for rejection of 65 SVTs was 78%. SVTs were rejected for a total of 2.7 hours. Inappropriate detections of SVT as VT were caused by electrogram truncation, myopotential interference with low-amplitude electrograms, waveform alignment error, and rate-dependent aberrancy. The first three accounted for 69% of inappropriate detections and could have been prevented by optimal programming. The optimal match-percent threshold was 60% to 70% based on a receiver-operator characteristic curve. After shocks, the median time for baseline electrogram morphology to normalize was 85 seconds. CONCLUSION: The wavelet morphology algorithm has high sensitivity for VT detection. Inappropriate detections of SVT as VT may be reduced by optimal programming. Downloadable software permits evaluation of new algorithms in implanted ICDs.     

Clinical experience with a new detection algorithm for differentiation of supraventricular from ventricular tachycardia in a dual-chamber defibrillator

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) is a frequent problem of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Dual-chamber ICDs have been developed to improve discrimination of SVT from ventricular tachycardia (VT). We investigated the positive predictivity, sensitivity, and specificity of a new algorithm, the SMART detection trade mark algorithm, incorporated in the Phylax AV (Biotronik) dual-chamber ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred nine patients (185 men, age 64 +/- 11 years) received a Phylax AV ICD with SMART detection trade mark activated. In 138 of these patients, 1,245 sustained tachycardia episodes with a detailed electrogram were stored in the device during a follow-up period of 10 +/- 6 months. Episodes were correctly classified as ventricular fibrillation (VF, n = 178) in 52 patients, VT (n = 641) in 98 patients, and SVT (n = 385) in 48 patients by the algorithm. Forty-one true SVT episodes (3.3%) were misclassified as VT: atrial fibrillation (n = 7) and flutter (n = 1), sinus tachycardia (n = 12), and other SVT (n = 21). The positive predictivity for VF/VT was 94.5% (95% CI 92.7-95.8) uncorrected and 94.5% (95% CI 92.9-95.8%) corrected with the generalized equation estimation (GEE) method. The positive predictivity for SVT was 100%. The specificity was 88.9% (95% CI 85.6-91.6%) uncorrected and 89.0% (95% CI 85.6-91.6%) corrected with the GEE method with a sensitivity of 100%. CONCLUSION: The SMART detection trade mark algorithm was safe and reliable for the detection of all ventricular tachycardias. Although its specificity was high, it should be improved with regard to SVT to avoid inappropriate ICD therapies.     

Do atrial tachyarrhythmias beget ventricular tachyarrhythmias in defibrillator recipients?

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to analyze the incidence of "dual tachycardia"-ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) preceded by paroxysmal atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial fibrillation (AF)-in patients receiving dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal AT/AF occurs commonly in patients who receive ICDs for the treatment of life-threatening VT/VF. Although AF is associated with an adverse prognosis in the setting of structural heart disease, the relationship between AT/AF and VT/VF is unclear. METHODS: We followed 537 patients undergoing implantation of the Jewel AF ICD (Model 7250, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) for 11.4 +/- 8.2 months. These included 398 patients with a history of at least two episodes of AT or AF during the preceding year as well as 139 patients enrolled because of VT/VF alone. RESULTS: There were 233 dual tachycardia episodes in 45 patients during follow-up. Overall, 8.9% of episodes detected as VT/VF were dual tachycardias, and 20.3% of patients with VT/VF had at least one dual tachycardia episode. The median duration of AT/AF preceding the first VT/VF detection was 1.09 h (25% to 75% quartile 0.24 to 33.4 h). When AT/AF continued between two consecutive VT/VF detections, the median interdetection interval was 11 min. When AT/AF terminated either because of a ventricular therapy or spontaneously, the median interdetection interval was prolonged to 71 h (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dual tachycardia is common in ICD recipients with a history of AT/AF. The duration of AT/AF preceding the first VT/VF detection is < or =1 h about 50% of the time. Termination of the AT/AF significantly delays the time to the next VT/VF detection.     

Dual chamber arrhythmia detection in the implantable cardioverter defibrillator

INTRODUCTION: Dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology extended ICD therapy to more than termination of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachyarrhythmias. It created the basis for dual chamber arrhythmia management in which dependable detection is important for treatment and prevention of both ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Dual chamber detection algorithms were investigated in two Medtronic dual chamber ICDs: the 7250 Jewel AF (33 patients) and the 7271 Gem DR (31 patients). Both ICDs use the same PR Logic algorithm to interpret tachycardia as ventricular tachycardia (VT), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), or dual (VT+ SVT). The accuracy of dual chamber detection was studied in 310 of 1,367 spontaneously occurring tachycardias in which rate criterion only was not sufficient for arrhythmia diagnosis. In 78 episodes there was a double tachycardia, in 223 episodes SVT was detected in the VT or ventricular fibrillation zone, and in 9 episodes arrhythmia was detected outside the boundaries of the PR Logic functioning. In 100% of double tachycardias the VT was correctly diagnosed and received priority treatment. SVT was seen in 59 (19%) episodes diagnosed as VT. The causes of inappropriate detection were (1) algorithm failure (inability to fulfill the PR相似文献   

Clinical performance of a specific algorithm to reconfirm self-terminating ventricular arrhythmias in current implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Inappropriate shock therapy is a frequent problem in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), caused mostly by supraventricular rhythms. Self-terminating ventricular arrhythmias (STVAs), however, may also lead to inappropriate shock discharges even in ICDs with abortive shock capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a specific ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) reconfirmation algorithm implemented in current ICD devices from Medtronic to prevent inappropriate shock discharges due to STVAs. A total of 161 STVA episodes were documented in 59 of 150 patients (39%) within a mean follow-up of 30 +/- 20 months and resulted in 25 inappropriate shock discharges in 15 of 150 patients (10%) despite activation of the reconfirmation algorithm. The first synchronization interval of the algorithm was met in 92% of STVA episodes with and even 38% of STVA episodes without shock delivery. A reduced incidence of inappropriate shocks due to STVAs was found with tachycardia/fibrillation detection intervals (TDI/FDI) programmed to shorter cycle lengths < or =280 ms or the use of the first 2 cycles after the end of charging to be considered for reconfirmation only. Thus, inappropriate shocks due to STVAs still occur in 10% of patients with ICDs despite activation of a specific VT/VF reconfirmation algorithm, and are mainly caused by meeting the first synchronization interval that therefore should be shortened in cycle length. Moreover, to reduce the likelihood of inappropriate shocks, the VF reconfirmation algorithm should be optimized by basing the synchronization intervals exclusively on the FDI with short cycle lengths or using the first 2 cycles for reconfirmation only.     

植入型心律转复除颤器不适当识别和治疗的发生率及常见原因

目的 植入型心律转复除颤器（ICD）是恶性室性心律失常患者惟一有效的治疗措施。不适当识别和治疗是ICD最常见的并发症，也是导致ICD患者再住院最主要的原因。本文旨在评价本中心的ICD患者不适当识别和治疗的发生率及常见原因。方法 入选2000年1月至2005年12月在本中心因室性心律失常植入ICD并能定期随访的50例患者。根据患者心律失常特点和心功能情况程控ICD的各项参数，定期随访，询问ICD中所有信息，打印、存盘并对储存的腔内电图进行逐条分析，以确定ICD诊断是否准确以及治疗是否有效，判断有无ICD不适当识别和治疗。结果 38例患者在随访期间发生了心律失常事件，ICD共记录到491次室性心动过速（VT）或心室颤动（VF）事件（VT383次，VF108次），其中有11例（22％）发生过≥1次的不适当识别和治疗事件。14．3％（55／383）的VT事件为不适当识别，并导致了78次抗心动过速起搏（ATP）治疗和9次电击治疗。VF不适当识别的发生率为26．9％（28／108），并导致了56次不适当电击事件。结论 植入新一代ICD患者中，不适当识别和治疗发生率仍较高。不适当识别和治疗最常见的原因是心房颤动（房颤）伴快速心室率，占50％以上；其次是由于电磁干扰或肌电干扰所致。     

First inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy is often due to inaccurate device programming: analysis of the French OPERA registry

AIMS: Inappropriate therapy delivered by implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) remains a challenge. The OPERA registry measured the times to, and studied the determinants of, first appropriate (FAT) and inappropriate (FIT) therapies delivered by single-, dual- and triple-chamber [cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D)] ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We entered 636 patients (mean age = 62.0 ± 13.5 years; 88% men) in the registry, of whom 251 received single-, 238 dual-, and 147 triple-chamber ICD, for primary (30.5%) or secondary (69.5%) indications. We measured times to FAT and FIT as a function of multiple clinical characteristics, examined the effects of various algorithm components on the likelihood of FAT and FIT delivery, and searched for predictors of FAT and FIT. Over 22.8 ± 8.8 months of observation, 184 patients (28.9%) received FAT and 70 (11.0%) received FIT. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was the trigger of 88% of FAT, and supraventricular tachycardia was the trigger of 91% of FIT. The median times to FIT (90 days; range 49-258) and FAT (171 days; 50-363) were similar. The rate of FAT was higher (P <0.001) in patients treated for secondary than primary indications, while that of FIT were similar in both groups. Out of 57 analysable FIT, 27 (47.4%) could have been prevented by fine tuning the device programming like the sustained rate duration or the VT discrimination algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: First inappropriate therapy occurred in 11% of 636 ICD recipients followed for ～2 years. Nearly 50% of FIT could have been prevented by improving device programming.     

Improving SVT discrimination in single-chamber ICDs: a new electrogram morphology-based algorithm

Introduction: Wide-spread adoption of ICD therapy has focused efforts on improving the quality of life for patients by reducing "inappropriate" shock therapies. To this end, distinguishing supraventricular tachycardia from ventricular tachycardia remains a major challenge for ICDs. More sophisticated discrimination algorithms based on ventricular electrogram morphology have been made practicable by the increased computational ability of modern ICDs.
Methods and Results: We report results from a large prospective study (1,122 pts) of a new ventricular electrogram morphology tachycardia discrimination algorithm (Wavelet™ Dynamic Discrimination, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) operating at minimal algorithm setting (RV coil-can electrogram, match threshold of 70%). This is a nonrandomized cohort study of ICD patients using the morphology discrimination of the Wavelet algorithm to distinguish SVT and VT/VF. The Wavelet criterion was required ON in all patients and all other supraventricular tachycardia discriminators were required to be OFF. Spontaneous episodes (N = 2,235) eligible for ICD therapy were adjudicated for detection algorithm performance. The generalized estimating equations method was used to remove bias introduced when an individual patient contributes multiple episodes. Inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia were reduced by 78% (90% CI: 72.8–82.9%) for episodes within the range of rates where Wavelet was programmed to discriminate. Sensitivity for sustained ventricular tachycardia was 98.6% (90% CI: 97–99.3%) without the use of high-rate time out.
Conclusions: Results from this prospective study of the Wavelet electrogram morphology discrimination algorithm operating as the sole discriminator in the ON mode demonstrate that inappropriate therapy for supraventricular tachycardia in a single-chamber ICD can be dramatically reduced compared to rate detection alone.     

Improvements in atrial fibrillation detection for real-time monitoring

Electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring plays an important role in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Automated real-time AF detection algorithm is an integral part of ECG monitoring during AF therapy. Before and after antiarrhythmic drug therapy and surgical procedures require ECG monitoring to ensure the success of AF therapy. This article reports our experience in developing a real-time AF monitoring algorithm and techniques to eliminate false-positive AF alarms. We start by designing an algorithm based on R-R intervals. This algorithm uses a Markov modeling approach to calculate an R-R Markov score. This score reflects the relative likelihood of observing a sequence of R-R intervals in AF episodes versus making the same observation outside AF episodes. Enhancement of the AF algorithm is achieved by adding atrial activity analysis. P-R interval variability and a P wave morphology similarity measure are used in addition to R-R Markov score in classification. A hysteresis counter is applied to eliminate short AF segments to reduce false AF alarms for better suitability in a monitoring environment. A large ambulatory Holter database (n = 633) was used for algorithm development and the publicly available MIT-BIH AF database (n = 23) was used for algorithm validation. This validation database allowed us to compare our algorithm performance with previously published algorithms. Although R-R irregularity is the main characteristic and strongest discriminator of AF rhythm, by adding atrial activity analysis and techniques to eliminate very short AF episodes, we have achieved 92% sensitivity and 97% positive predictive value in detecting AF episodes, and 93% sensitivity and 98% positive predictive value in quantifying AF segment duration.     

A new ICD morphology criterion for differentiating supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia

The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A new morphology discrimination (MD) algorithm has been introduced to improve specificity of ICD therapy without loss of sensitivity. It was the aim of this study to systematically analyze sensitivity and specificity of the MD criterion in combination with the enhanced detection criteria sudden onset and rate stability in the detection of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia. After ICD implantation in 259 patients, 787 detected episodes in 74 patients with available stored electrograms were documented during a follow-up period of 359 +/- 214 days. With a nominal programming of the MD algorithm at > or = 60%, sensitivity and specificity for all episodes were 82.6%/77.2%. For sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter the specificities were 80.6%, 69.6% and 75%, respectively. In patients with primarily appropriate MD detection, sensitivity and specificity significantly improved to 95.8%/91.7%. Programming the sudden onset criterion with < 100 ms and the stability criterion with < 50 ms, sensitivity and stability of the combined application of the MD algorithm and sudden onset and MD algorithm and stability were 96.2%/52.2% and 94.4%/63.8%, respectively. The MD criterion in combination with other enhanced detection criteria might significantly improve specificity of tachyarrythmia detection of ICD therapy.     

Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Benefits and Limitations

Dual chamber ICD capable of providing dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular arrhythmia therapy is now available. We report our experience of clinical performance of dual chamber ICDs amongst Chinese population.Methods: 9 patients (6 men and 3 women) received dual chamber ICDs, mean age 50 ± 18.8 years. The indications were ventricular fibrillation (VF) [5], hemodynamic intolerant ventricular tachycardia (VT) [3] and unexplained syncope plus positive induction of VF [1]. The underlying cardiac pathology were congenital LQT syndrome(1), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [2], coronary artery disease [2], rheumatic valvular disease [1], Brugada syndrome [1], arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia [1] and idiopathic VF [1]. Four patients have documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients have defibrillation thresholds (DFT) determined with a binary search protocol starting at 12 joules (J) at implantation.Results: A total of 34 episodes of VF were induced at implantation with mean DFT 13.8 ± 7 J. The average shocking impedance was 40 ± 3.6 . The mean acute P wave measured 3.3 ± 1.3 mV and R wave measured 13.2 ± 3.2 mV. Atrial and ventricular thresholds, at pulse width 0.5 ms, averaged 0.8 ± 0.4 V and 0.4 ± 0.2 V. During follow-up period, 16 episodes of VF were documented and were successfully treated with the first programmed shock. In the patient with LQT syndrome, DDD was initiated to prevent pause-dependant VF. Three episodes of inappropriate therapy (15.8%) were delivered. One patient experienced 2 shocks after exercise. Stored electrograms showed sinus tachycardia with first degree heart block which was misdiagnosed as VT with retrograde 1:1 conduction. Another inappropriate therapy occurred with AF with fast ventricular response within the VF zone and VT therapy inhibitor was disabled.Conclusion: Dual chamber ICD allows combined benefits of DDD and VT/VF therapy. Storage of both atrial and ventricular electrograms provide more information in elucidation of nature of dysarrhythmias. Inappropriate shocks, though reduced, are still possible and the rigid algorithms of SVT discrimination from VT will need further published.     

Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Children and Young Adults with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: Rapidly conducted supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) can lead to inappropriate device therapy in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. We sought to determine the incidence of SVTs and the occurrence of inappropriate ICD therapy due to SVT in a pediatric and young adult population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We undertook a retrospective review of clinical course, Holter monitoring, and ICD interrogations of patients receiving ICD follow-up at our institution between March 1992 and December 1999. Of 81 new ICD implantations, 54 eligible patients (median age 16.5 years, range 1 to 48) were identified. Implantation indications included syncope and/or spontaneous/inducible ventricular arrhythmia with congenital heart disease (30), long QT syndrome (9), structurally normal heart (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) (7), and cardiomyopathies (7). Sixteen patients (30%) received a dual-chamber ICD. SVT was recognized in 16 patients, with 12 of 16 having inducible or spontaneous atrial tachycardias. Eighteen patients (33%) received > or =1 appropriate shock(s) for VT/VF; 8 patients (15%) received inappropriate therapy for SVT. Therapies were altered after an inappropriate shock by increasing the detection time or rate and/or increasing beta-blocker dosage. No single-chamber ICD was initially programmed with detection enhancements, such as sudden onset, rate stability, or QRS discriminators. Only one dual-chamber defibrillator was programmed with an atrial discrimination algorithm. Appropriate ICD therapy was not withheld due to detection parameters or SVT discrimination programming. CONCLUSION: SVT in children and young adults with ICDs is common. Inappropriate shocks due to SVT can be curtailed even without dual-chamber devices or specific SVT discrimination algorithms.     

Randomized controlled study of detection enhancements versus rate-only detection to prevent inappropriate therapy in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare rate-only detection to enhanced detection in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), to discriminate ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia. BACKGROUND: ICDs are highly effective in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, they frequently deliver inappropriate therapy during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of detection enhancements in a dual-chamber ICD compared to control (rate-only) detection to discriminate VT from SVT. Detection enhancements included a specific standardized protocol identical for all patients for programming rate stability, sudden onset, atrial-to-ventricular relationship (sudden onset = 9% and rate stability = 10 ms; V > A "on"), and "sustained rate duration" (3 minutes). The primary endpoint was the time to first inappropriate therapy classified by a blinded events committee. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients had a history of sustained VT or VF. Mean age (+/- SD) was 60 +/- 13 years; 83% were male, and mean ejection fraction was 35 +/- 15%. Control (n = 70) and "enhanced" (n = 79) groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, ejection fraction, or primary arrhythmia. The proportion of patients free of inappropriate therapy over time was significantly higher in the enhanced versus the control group (hazard ratio = 0.47, P = .011). High-energy shocks were reduced from 0.58 +/- 4.23 shocks/patient/month in the control group to 0.04 +/- 0.15 shocks/patient/month in the enhanced group (P = .0425). No patient programmed per protocol failed to receive therapy for VT detected by the ICD (422 VT episodes). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized programming in a dual-chamber ICD leads to a significant and clinically important reduction in inappropriate therapies compared to rate-only detection and does not compromise safety with respect to appropriate treatment of VT.     

植入型心律转复除颤器不适当治疗的原因分析及处理

目的 分析植入型心律转复除颤器(ICD)误诊断和误放电治疗的原因,寻找解决方法 .方法 34例住院病人,男性24例,女性10例,平均年龄(62.54±11.17)岁.植入单腔ICD(VVI)21例,双腔ICD(DDDR)3例,三腔ICD(CRT-D)10例,平均随访(20.72±16.98)个月.结果 (1)ICD的误诊断和误放电治疗6例(占17.6%),其中单腔ICD 3例,三腔ICD 3例.(2)原因:1例(单腔ICD)对噪音误识别;4例患者是对心房颤动(AF)伴快速心室率的误识别,由于AF的心室率达到心室颤动(VF)检测区的标准,将其识别为VF.1例(V350型,ST.Jude公司)CR-D患者因室上性心动过速(SVT)误电击7次,原因是ICD能正确识别SVT,但出厂设置了对SVT的最长诊断时间为60 s,SVT持续60 s后不消失,ICD自动按室性心动过速设置程序进行治疗,行3阵ATP治疗未转复继续电转复.(3)2例患者在VF区设立了快速室性心动过速(FVT)区,4次AF的心室率达到FVT检测区频率,经1阵抗心动过速起搏(ATP)治疗后转复.(4)共误放电40次.单腔ICD患者14次,三腔ICD患者26次.6例患者均发生在短时间内连续电击事件,1例患者曾在3 h内发生7次电击事件.结论 AF伴快速心室率(达到VF区的频率)是各种ICD误识别的主要原因,因此控制AF的心室率是减少ICD不适当治疗的基础.过多的电击治疗会给患者很大的痛苦和恐惧,建议加强药物治疗,必要时行射频消融治疗.     

Clinical Experience with the New Detection Algorithms for Atrial Fibrillation of a Defibrillator with Dual Chamber Sensing and Pacing

INTRODUCTION: A major drawback of therapy with an implantable defibrillator is the nonspecificity of detection. Theoretically, adding atrial sensing information to a decision algorithm could improve specificity of detection. METHODS AND RESULTS: This open-label nonrandomized study compares the detection algorithm of the Ventak AV and the Ventak Mini implantable defibrillators. The Ventak AV (n = 39) uses dual chamber detection as opposed to single chamber detection (with rate stability) in the Ventak Mini (n = 55). Programmed zone configurations, rate thresholds, and stability criteria were identical in all patients. In the Ventak AV group, 235 ventricular tachyarrhythmias were adequately detected and treated by the device. In the Mini group, 699 episodes of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia occurred. All but six of the latter episodes were correctly identified and treated: one patient with incessant ventricular tachycardia had five episodes not terminated by the device, another episode occurred in a patient with a device/lead defect. In the Ventak AV group, 33 episodes of sinus tachycardia and 166 episodes of atrial fibrillation/flutter activated the device; inappropriate therapy was applied to 41% of atrial fibrillation/flutter episodes. In the Ventak Mini group, 226 supraventricular tachyarrhythmias activated the device, eight of which were sinus tachycardia and 218 were atrial fibrillation or flutter; of the atrial fibrillation/ flutter episodes 24% were treated inappropriately (fewer vs Ventak AV, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The new detection algorithm incorporated in the Ventak AV did not inadvertently withhold therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but at the same time the number of inappropriate therapies for atrial fibrillation was not decreased in comparison to a single chamber device.     

Do Current Dual Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators Have Advantages Over Conventional Single Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators in Reducing Inappropriate Therapies? A Randomized,Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION: Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate therapies in patients with conventional single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (VVI-ICD). It was anticipated that dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators (DDD-ICD), with their capacity to analyze atrial and ventricular rhythm, could substantially reduce inappropriate therapies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our prospective study included 92 patients (87 men; mean age 61 +/- 12.7 years) who were randomly assigned to a VVI-ICD (45 patients) or a DDD-ICD (47 patients). Both groups were followed for 7.5 +/- 3.5 and 7.6 +/- 4.1 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, overall 725 ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes were recorded in 45 (49%) of 92 patients. Of these episodes, 404 (56%) occurred in the VVI-ICD group and 321 (44%) episodes occurred in the DDD-ICD group. Twenty-three (51%) patients in the VVI-ICD group and 22 (47%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.8) developed VT/VF. Overall, 73 (10%) of 725 treated episodes were inappropriate in 6 (13%) patients in the VVI group and in 10 (21%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.2). There were 22 (31%) inappropriately treated episodes in the VVI-ICD group and 51 (69%) in the DDD-ICD group. Thirty-two of the 51 inappropriate episodes in the DDD-ICD patients resulted from intermittent atrial sensing problems that led to failure of the respective dual chamber algorithms. Nonfatal complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients in the VVI-ICD group and in 3 (6%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.7). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the implanted DDD-ICD and conventional VVI-ICD are equally safe and effective for therapy of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Although DDD-ICDs allow better rhythm classification, the applied detection algorithms do not offer benefits in avoiding inappropriate therapies during supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.