Corticosteroid trials in non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction: a comparison of oral prednisolone and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate.

One hundred and twenty seven adults considered on clinical grounds to have non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction entered a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial comparing the physiological response to inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 500 micrograms thrice daily with oral prednisolone 40 mg a day, both given for two weeks. One hundred and seven patients completed the study. Response was assessed as change in FEV1 and FVC measured on the last treatment day, and as change in mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the final seven days of treatment from home PEF recordings performed five times daily. A full response to treatment was defined as an increase in FEV or FVC, or an increase in mean daily PEF over the final seven days of treatment, of at least 20% from baseline values. An improvement in one measurement of at least 15%, or of 10% in any two measurements, was defined as a partial treatment response. Response to placebo showed a significant order effect, suggesting a carry over effect of active treatment of at least three weeks. Response to active treatment was therefore related to initial baseline values, and compared with placebo by considering responses in the first treatment phase only. A full response to oral prednisolone (16/38) was significantly more common than to placebo (3/35). The number of full responses to inhaled beclomethasone (8/34) did not differ significantly from the number responding to oral prednisolone or placebo in the first treatment phase, though full and partial responses to inhaled beclomethasone (12/34) were significantly more common than those to placebo (4/35). When all three treatment phases were considered 44/107 patients showed a full response to one or both forms of corticosteroid treatment, a response to prednisolone (39) occurring more frequently than to inhaled beclomethasone (26). Only 21 of the 44 responders showed a response to both forms of treatment. Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 500 micrograms thrice daily was inferior to oral prednisolone 40 mg per day, but better than placebo, in producing improvement in physiological measurements in patients thought to have nonasthmatic chronic airflow obstruction. It was, however, an effective alternative in over half of those showing a response to prednisolone.     

Prednisolone in the treatment of airflow obstruction in adults with cystic fibrosis.

The effect of oral prednisolone on the lung function of 20 adult patients with cystic fibrosis who had severe stable airflow obstruction was assessed in a placebo controlled study, blind to the patients. Placebo tablets were followed by prednisolone given in a median dose of 0.48 mg/kg body weight/day (20 mg/day in 11 patients, 30 mg/day in nine patients), each for three weeks. No significant improvement was seen in lung function in the group after receiving prednisolone, and none of the individual patients had clinically useful improvements in lung function. Atopic subjects showed an improvement in evening recordings of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) while taking prednisolone (p less than 0.05). Significant deterioration in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) was seen after withdrawal of prednisolone. Two patients developed pneumothoraces while taking prednisolone.     

Time course of response to oral and inhaled corticosteroids in non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction.

One hundred and twenty one patients considered on clinical grounds to have non-asthmatic chronic airflow obstruction completed a double blind, crossover trial comparing oral prednisolone 40 mg per day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 500 micrograms thrice daily, each given for 14 days, with a 14 day washout period between treatments. The time course of response was analysed for the 57 occasions where there was a significant increase in mean daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the treatment period. Mean daily PEF was still rising at day 14 on 12 occasions. After withdrawal of treatment mean daily PEF remained above pretreatments levels for more than two weeks in half the responses analysed. The peak response occurred earlier with inhaled beclomethasone (median 9.5 (range 3-14) days) than with oral prednisolone (median 12 (range 1-14) days), though both treatments produced a response that was sustained for a similar period. The results suggest that a trial of treatment with corticosteroids in this group of patients should last more than 14 days, and that in a study with a crossover design the washout period should be longer than two weeks.     

Value of serial peak expiratory flow measurements in assessing treatment response in chronic airflow limitation.

A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of prednisolone (40 mg/day for 14 days) was carried out in 33 patients with chronic airflow limitation (mean age 62 years, mean FEV1 1.01 litres, mean FEV1/FVC ratio 44%), to assess the value of serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, taken five times daily in evaluating treatment response by comparison with other objective measurements and with measurements of symptoms. The mean serial PEF after a one week run in period was 189 1 min-1, during the second week of placebo 193 1 min-1, and during the second week on prednisolone 231 1 min-1. The difference in mean PEF values between placebo and prednisolone was significant (p less than 0.01). With regard to the response to steroids of the individual patients, 13 of the 33 had a detectable trend of improvement on visual inspection of serial PEF measurements during prednisolone treatment but only one during placebo administration. Of all the objective measurements made after the run in and after each treatment phase (12 minute walking distance, FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), serial PEF), the serial PEF chart provided the best discrimination between placebo and prednisolone treatment. There was no statistically significant association between steroid induced improvement in serial PEF measurements and in breathlessness, partly because of placebo improvements in symptoms in those who had no improvement in serial PEF values. This study indicates the importance of making objective measurements to identify a genuine steroid response rather than relying on symptomatic improvement alone. The best simple measurement to make is serial PEF during steroid trials. This is more sensitive in detecting a steroid response than are the 12 minute walking distance, FEV1, or FVC, and is also less likely than these measurements to show spurious placebo responses.     

Bronchial responsiveness, lung mechanics, gas transfer, and corticosteroid response in patients with chronic airflow obstruction.

Thirty patients with stable chronic airflow obstruction receiving regular bronchodilator treatment were studied to determine whether the level of bronchial responsiveness, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (TLCO), or the mechanical properties of the lung predicted a bronchodilator response to oral corticosteroid treatment. Before treatment mean (SD) FEV1 was 48% (16%) of the predicted value (% pred); the geometric mean concentration of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was 0.44 (range 0.07-3.32) mg/ml; and TLCO was 59% (21%) predicted. The exponential constant (k) defining the shape of the static volume-pressure curve was 146% (66%) predicted and pulmonary conductance relative to predicted lung volume at a transpulmonary pressure of 5 cm H2O (sGL5) was 72% (37%) predicted. After prednisolone treatment (0.6 mg kg-1 day-1 for two weeks) FEV1 increased by 8% (19%) (p less than 0.05) and daily mean peak flow (PEF) by 3% (10%) (p less than 0.01) over pretreatment values. Three patients had an increase in FEV1 of more than 30%, two of whom had sputum eosinophilia (p less than 0.05). The three were among the 13 patients with a reduced sGL5. The increase in FEV1 did not correlate with initial PC20 (r = 0.16), k (r = -0.12), or TLCO (r = -0.14). Thus measurements of bronchial responsiveness, lung distensibility, and TLCO did not predict corticosteroid response in patients with stable chronic airflow obstruction. Patients with sputum eosinophilia or reduced pulmonary conductance may be more likely to respond.     

Circadian change in bronchial responsiveness and airflow obstruction in asthmatic children.

To throw light on the question of whether the increase in bronchial responsiveness seen during the night is due to increased airflow obstruction, nine asthmatic children with increased airflow obstruction at night (group 1) were compared with nine without (group 2). The mean fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between 16.00 and 04.00 hours was 21.9% in group 1 and 2.3% in group 2. Selection of patients was based on the amplitude of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) measured every four hours for three consecutive days at home. The study was performed in hospital on four consecutive days. Medication was withheld for three days before and during the measurements at home and in hospital. On the first day in hospital (day 4) FEV1 was measured every four hours for 24 hours. On day 6 inhaled histamine provocation tests were performed at the same times as the FEV1 measurements on day 4. Both groups showed a nocturnal fall in the provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). The mean change in histamine PC20 from 16.00 to 04.00 hours was 1.1 doubling doses of histamine in group 1 and 1.5 doubling doses in group 2. The results indicate that the increase in nocturnal bronchial responsiveness that occurs at night is not due to an increase in airflow obstruction.     

Psychological changes and improvement in chronic airflow limitation after corticosteroid treatment.

Corticosteroids may produce mood changes. This could account for improvement in patients with chronic airflow limitation following trials of oral corticosteroid treatment as mood elevation might improve performance in objective measurements. This proposition was tested in 21 patients with chronic airflow limitation, who underwent detailed psychological assessment during a randomised controlled double blind crossover trial of the effect of prednisolone 40 mg daily compared with that of a placebo. Self rating visual analogue scales for various qualities of mood were completed before the study and after each phase in addition to depression and psychological symptom questionnaires. After treatment with the placebo, patients showed increases in cheerfulness (p less than 0.01) and sociability (p less than 0.01) and a decrease in depression (p less than 0.01). After treatment with prednisolone there were increases in cheerfulness (p less than 0.01), optimism (p less than 0.01), activity (p less than 0.05), and sociability (p less than 0.02) and there was a decrease in depression (p less than 0.01). When placebo and prednisolone values were compared, however, there were no significant differences. Some patients showed improvements (greater than 20%) in peak expiratory flow, FEV1 or forced vital capacity (FVC) after prednisolone, but nearly all had improvements in at least one psychological test. There were no detectable associations between changes in objective measurements and changes in psychological test ratings. This study suggests that in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease significant psychological changes are no more likely to follow treatment with a corticosteroid than treatment with a placebo and that physiological improvement after corticosteroid treatment is not tied to psychological changes.     

Validity of peak expiratory flow measurement in assessing reversibility of airflow obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the reversibility of airflow obstruction by peak expiratory (PEF) measurements would be practicable in general practice, but its usefulness has not been investigated. METHODS: PEF measurements were performed (miniWright peak flow meter) in 73 general practice patients (aged 40 to 84) with a history of asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease before and after 400 micrograms inhaled sulbutamol. The change in PEF was compared with the change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Reversible airflow obstruction was analysed in two ways according to previous criteria. When defined as a 9% or greater increase in FEV1 expressed as a percentage of predicted values reversibility was observed in 42% of patients. Relative operating characteristic analysis showed that an absolute improvement in PEF of 60 l/min or more gave optimal discrimination between patients with reversible and irreversible airflow obstruction (the sensitivity and specificity of an increase of 60 l/min in detecting a 9% or more increase in FEV1 as a percentage of predicted values were 68% and 93% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 87%). When defined as an increase of 190 ml or more in FEV1, reversible airflow obstruction was observed in 53% of patients. Again an absolute improvement in PEF of 60 l/min or more gave optimal discrimination between patients with reversible and irreversible airflow obstruction (sensitivity 56%, specificity 94%, and positive predictive value 92%). CONCLUSION: Absolute changes in PEF can be used as a simple technique to diagnose reversible airflow obstruction in patients from general practice.     

Optimal particle size for beta 2 agonist and anticholinergic aerosols in patients with severe airflow obstruction.

BACKGROUND: The optimal particle size of a beta 2 agonist or anticholinergic aerosol in patients with severe airflow obstruction is unknown. METHODS: Seven stable patients with a mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 37.9% of the predicted value inhaled three types of monodisperse salbutamol and ipratropium bromide aerosols with particle sizes of 1.5 microns, 2.8 microns, and 5 microns, respectively, and a placebo aerosol. The volunteers inhaled 20 micrograms salbutamol and 8 micrograms ipratropium bromide, after which lung function changes were determined and analysed with repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Greater improvements in FEV1, specific airway conductance (sGaw) and maximum expiratory flow at 75%/50% of the forced vital capacity (MEF75/50) were induced by the 2.8 microns aerosol than by the other particle sizes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe airflow obstruction the particle size of choice for a beta 2 agonist or anticholinergic aerosol should be approximately 3 microns.     

Peak flow variation in childhood asthma: correlation with symptoms, airways obstruction, and hyperresponsiveness during long term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for asthma management focus on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and on home recording of peak expiratory flow (PEF). The effect of maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on PEF variation and its relation to other parameters of disease activity were examined in 102 asthmatic children aged 7-14 years. METHODS: During 20 months of treatment with inhaled salbutamol, with or without inhaled budesonide (600 micrograms daily), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the dose of histamine required to provoke a fall in FEV1 of more than 20% (PD20), the percentage of symptom free days, and PEF variation were assessed bimonthly. PEF variation was computed as the lowest PEF as a percentage of the highest PEF occurring over 14 days, the usual way of expressing PEF variation in asthma self-management plans. For each patient using inhaled corticosteroids within subject correlation coefficients (rho) were computed of PEF variation to the percentage of symptom free days, FEV1, and PD20. RESULTS: PEF variation decreased significantly during the first two months of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and then remained stable. The same pattern was observed for symptoms and FEV1. In contrast, PD20 histamine continued to improve throughout the whole follow up period. In individual patients predominantly positive associations of PEF variation with symptoms, FEV1, and PD20 were found, but the ranges of these associations were wide. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment with inhaled corticosteroids the changes in PEF variation over time show poor concordance with changes in other parameters of asthma severity. When only PEF is monitored, clinically relevant deteriorations in symptoms, FEV1, or PD20 may be missed. This suggests that home recording of PEF alone may not be sufficient to monitor asthma severity reliably in children.     

Efficacy of inhaled salmeterol in the management of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a single centre randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study.

BACKGROUND--The acute response to bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is modest; it has, however, been suggested that these patients may benefit from long term treatment. METHODS--To investigate the efficacy of salmeterol in smokers with moderate to severe COPD a double blind, randomised, crossover comparison was performed between salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) and placebo in 63 patients with stable COPD (mean age 65 years). Prior to inclusion, all patients had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of < 60% of predicted and an improvement in FEV1 of < 15% following 400 micrograms inhaled salbutamol. Patients received four weeks of therapy with each of the treatment regimens. Assessment of efficacy was made with recording of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEF), respiratory symptoms, and use of rescue salbutamol. FEV1 was measured before and after nebulised salbutamol prior to randomisation and at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS--Morning PEF values were higher during the salmeterol than during the placebo period, although the mean treatment difference was small (12 l/min (95% confidence limits 6 to 17)). No difference in mean evening PEF values was found. Diurnal variation in PEF, assessed as the difference between the morning PEF and that of the previous evening, was more pronounced during the placebo than during the salmeterol period. The mean spirometric values (including reversibility in FEV1) obtained at the end of the two treatment periods were similar. Compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol was associated with lower daytime and night time symptom scores and less use of rescue salbutamol both during the day and the night. The patients rated the treatment with salmeterol better than treatment with placebo. CONCLUSIONS--This study shows that, compared with placebo, treatment with salmeterol produces an improvement in respiratory symptoms and morning PEF values in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with long acting beta agonists may therefore result in an improvement in functional status, even in patients suffering from apparently nonreversible obstructive pulmonary disease.     

Assessment of reversibility of airway obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease.

Spirometry before and after an inhaled beta agonist or a course of oral prednisolone is widely used to detect reversible airflow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. How many of these patients have a response and how the response to beta agonists relates to the response to corticosteroids is not clear. In 127 outpatients (mean (SD) FEV1 0.92 (0.38) 1) who had a clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease (continuous breathlessness for more than six months and an FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio less than 60%) and who appeared to be stable, the change in FEV1 was measured after salbutamol 200 micrograms from a metered dose inhaler and 5 mg from a nebuliser. Symptoms and spirometric values were recorded before and after two weeks of oral prednisolone 30 mg. Reversibility was defined as a response in FEV1 of 15% or more from baseline alone and as a 15% change and a minimum increase of at least 200 ml. The latter gave results that showed greater internal consistency between the drug regimens. On the basis of this criterion 56 patients (44%) had no response to salbutamol or prednisolone, 71 responded to salbutamol (including all 27 steroid responders), and 25 patients had a response to salbutamol 5 mg but not to 200 micrograms. In general, the largest increase in FEV1 after salbutamol occurred in the subjects with greatest improvement after prednisolone. Subjects showing a response in FEV1 after two weeks' prednisolone had a fall in total symptom score, unlike those who had no response to any treatment or a response to salbutamol only. These data show that reversibility in response to beta agonists is common in patients diagnosed on clinical grounds as having stable chronic obstructive lung disease, that it can be substantial, and that it is best detected by using a larger dose of salbutamol. Salbutamol responders were those most likely to improve after a trial of oral prednisolone. Allowance should be made for the variability of FEV1 in the calculation of the percentage response at low baseline values (less than 1 litre).     

Atopy, immunological changes, and respiratory function in bronchiectasis

Cystic fibrosis has been reported to be associated with an increased prevalence of atopy and reversible airways obstruction. To determine whether such features can also result from other chronic suppurative lung infections, we studied 23 patients with proved bronchiectasis, and 23 age and sex matched normal controls. A personal or family history of atopy was reported with equal frequency in the two groups. Although the groups displayed a similar prevalence of positive immediate hypersensitivity skinprick test responses, the positive patients reacted to more antigens (p less than 0.05) and had larger weal diameters (p less than 0.01) than the positive controls. Other indices, such as blood eosinophil counts and serum IgE, did not differ significantly. Serum concentrations of immunoglobulins G, A, and M and of the four IgG subclasses tended to be higher in patients than controls, but only in the case of IgA (p less than 0.01) was this difference significant. No case of IgG subclass deficiency was noted. The patients displayed significant airflow obstruction, the mean basal one second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) being 67%, 77%, and 67% of their predicted values. There was evidence of a significant reversible obstructive component in that FEV1 or PEFR or both increased by 15% or more in nine of the 23 patients after inhalation of fenoterol, the mean increases in FEV1, FVC, and PEFR for the whole group being 9.5%, 11%, and 16.9%. These results indicate that while bronchiectasis provokes a hyperimmune response it differs from cystic fibrosis in that there is no significant increase in the prevalence of atopy. The finding of reversible airways obstruction, however, suggests that bronchodilators may be useful adjuncts to treatment.     

Time course of response to prednisolone in chronic airflow obstruction.

Nineteen patients with chronic airflow obstruction measured their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) daily for 28 days. A placebo was taken for the first week and prednisolone 20 mg twice daily was taken for the last three weeks. The mean PEF in 13 patients who responded to prednisolone reached a maximum after eight days' treatment. The majority of the 19 patients had asthma and were thought to represent a typical cross section of patients who would be considered for a trial of oral corticosteroids. Most responsive patients will achieve a maximum response within eight days.     

Effect of betamethasone on airway obstruction and bronchial response to salbutamol in prednisolone resistant asthma.

Twelve patients with chronic severe asthma, having previously shown an FEV1 increase of less than 20% of the predicted value with prednisolone treatment (20-60 mg daily for 10 days), took part in a double blind crossover comparison of equipotent anti-inflammatory doses of betamethasone and prednisolone. Betamethasone (8 mg) and prednisolone (40 mg) were administered daily for 10 days with a washout period of 10 days between. In this first part of the study betamethasone was administered intramuscularly and prednisolone orally. Placebo injections and tablets were used. Mean FEV1 was not significantly different before each period. There was a significant increase in FEV1 while they were taking betamethasone but not prednisolone. Individual analysis of the data showed that FEV1 increased with betamethasone in nine patients and remained stable or decreased in three. During treatment with prednisolone baseline FEV1 increased moderately in three patients (FEV1 0.3, 0.5 and 0.6 l) and remained stable or decreased in nine. There was no significant difference between the bronchodilator responses to cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol when they were measured immediately before, on the last day of treatment with each steroid, and between steroid treatment periods. The same protocol was followed four months later in five of the 12 patients but both drugs were administered orally on this occasion. Similar results were obtained. The greater effect of betamethasone on bronchial obstruction may be due to its longer biological half life or to some unidentified property of its metabolites. The bronchial response to inhaled beta 2 agonist appears not to be influenced by either steroid in these patients.     

A randomised controlled comparison of tiotropium nd ipratropium in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Dutch Tiotropium Study Group

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tiotropium and ipratropium during long term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: 288 patients of mean (SD) age 65 (8) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 41 (12)% predicted participated in a 14 centre, double blind, double dummy, parallel group study and were randomised after a run in period of two weeks to receive either tiotropium 18 microg once daily from a dry powder inhaler (HandiHaler; two thirds of patients) or ipratropium 40 microg four times daily from a metered dose inhaler (one third of patients) for a period of 13 weeks. Outcome measures were lung function, daily records of peak expiratory flow (PEF), and the use of concomitant salbutamol. FEV(1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were measured one hour before and immediately before inhalation (mean value of the two measurements on test day 1 was the baseline value while on all other test days it was known as the trough FEV(1) and FVC), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after inhalation of the study drug on days 1, 8, 50, and 92. RESULTS: During treatment tiotropium achieved a significantly greater improvement than ipratropium (p<0.05) in trough, average, and peak FEV(1) levels and in trough and average FVC levels. The trough FEV(1) response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.15 l (95% CI 0.11 to 0.19) and 0.16 l (95% CI 0.12 to 0.20) for tiotropium and between 0.01 l (95% CI -0.03 to 0.05) and 0.03 l (95% CI 0.01 to 0. 07) for ipratropium. The trough FVC response on days 8, 50, and 92 ranged between 0.34 l (95% CI 0.28 to 0.40) and 0.39 l (95% CI 0.31 to 0.47) for tiotropium and between 0.08 l (95% CI 0.00 to 0.16) and 0.18 l (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28) for ipratropium. On all test days tiotropium produced a greater improvement in FEV(1) than ipratropium starting three hours after inhalation (p<0.05). During treatment weekly mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) was consistently better in the tiotropium group than in the ipratropium group, the difference in morning PEF being significant up through week 10 and in evening PEF up through week 7 of treatment (p<0.05). The use of concomitant salbutamol was also lower in the tiotropium group (p<0.05). The only drug related adverse event was dry mouth (tiotropium 14.7%, ipratropium 10.3% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium in a dose of 18 microg inhaled once daily using the HandiHaler was significantly more effective than 40 microg ipratropium four times daily in improving trough, average, and peak lung function over the 13 week period. The safety profile of tiotropium was similar to ipratropium. These data support the use of tiotropium as first line treatment for the long term maintenance treatment of patients with airflow obstruction due to COPD.     

Bronchial responsiveness and acute bronchodilator response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diffuse panbronchiolitis.

BACKGROUND--Diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB) is characterised clinically by chronic airflow limitation and respiratory tract infection, and pathologically by chronic bronchiolar inflammation. To elucidate the functional differences between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and DPB the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was compared in 64 patients with COPD and 32 patients with DPB, and the bronchodilator response was compared in 72 patients with COPD and 49 with DPB. METHODS--Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was determined by the dosimeter method and expressed as PD20FEV1, and bronchodilator response was measured as the change in percentage predicted response with 5 mg nebulised salbutamol. RESULTS--Baseline FEV1 was similar in the two groups of patients. Patients with COPD were more responsive to methacholine than were those with DPB (geometric mean PD20FEV1 8.87 v 48.0 cumulative units). Reversibility of air flow obstruction, expressed as the difference between the percentage predicted postbronchodilator FEV1 and prebronchodilator FEV1, was significantly larger in patients with COPD than in those with DPB (7.87 (6.52)% v 4.16 (4.43)%). CONCLUSIONS--The observation that patients with DPB differ substantially in bronchial responsiveness from those with COPD is thought to reflect the difference in the mechanisms of these two diseases--that is, airway disease in DPB and more parenchymal disease in the group of patients with COPD. The nature of bronchiolar inflammation in COPD and DPB is also different, possibly explaining the difference in bronchial responsiveness. More fixed airflow limitation as a result of structural bronchiolar lesions in DPB will explain the smaller reversibility of airflow obstruction.     

Effects of an external resistance on maximum flow in chronic obstructive lung disease: implications for recognition of coincident upper airway obstruction.

To determine how the presence of generalised airflow limitation due to chronic obstructive lung disease affects the recognition of simulated upper airway obstruction, a study was carried out in 12 patients (mean (SD) age 57 (7) years) with chronic obstructive lung disease (FEV1% predicted 53 (22), range 21-70) and 12 matched control subjects. Patients and control subjects performed maximal inspiratory and expiratory flow-volume curves in a variable volume plethysmograph with and without upper airway obstruction simulated at the mouth with a series of polythene washers of internal diameter 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 mm. In patients, as in normal subjects, peak expiratory flow (PEF) and maximum inspiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity (Vmax50) were more sensitive to upper airway obstruction than were FEV1 or maximum expiratory flow at 50% VC (VEmax50); but the reductions in all indices caused by simulated upper airway obstruction were smaller in the patients than in the controls. The fall in PEF (whether expressed in absolute units or as a percentages) consequent on severe (4 mm) upper airway obstruction became smaller with increasing severity of chronic obstructive lung disease. The subjects also produced flow-volume curves with and without 6 mm upper airway obstruction while breathing helium and oxygen (heliox). In both groups the effects of heliox on PEF and Vmax50 were increased when upper airway obstruction was simulated. It was confirmed that the functional recognition of upper airway obstruction is more difficult in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease than in normal subjects and this difficulty increases with severity of disease; an unusually large increase in PEF or Vmax50 while the patient is breathing heliox should raise the suspicion of coexisting upper airway obstruction, but such a pattern is not specific.     

Pulmonary function and symptoms in workers exposed to wood dust.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to wood dust can cause a variety of lung problems, including chronic airflow obstruction. METHODS: Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced expiratory ratio (FEV1/FVC x 100), forced expiratory flow (FEF), forced mid expiratory flow (FMF), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm, breathlessness, wheezing, and nasal symptoms) were recorded in 145 non-smoking workers (77 male, 68 female) exposed to wood dust in a furniture factory in Umtata, Republic of Transkei, and 152 non-smoking control subjects (77 male, 75 female) from a bottling factory with a clean environment. RESULTS: After adjustment for age and standing height the forced expiratory indices were significantly lower in the exposed male workers than in the control subjects. FEF and PEF in the exposed men were 81.3% and 89.4% of predicted values and were lower than other indices. FVC in exposed men showed a significant inverse correlation with exposure (expressed in number of years of employment). The FVC was reduced by 26 ml per year of employment. The proportion of men with an FEV1/FVC below 70 was higher in exposed workers than in control subjects and higher in the exposed workers with more years of employment. The exposed workers had more respiratory symptoms than the control subjects, the prevalence, especially of cough and nasal symptoms, increasing with the increase in the number of years of employment. CONCLUSION: Workers exposed to pine and fibre dust have more respiratory symptoms and a greater risk of airflow obstruction.     

Airflow obstruction in bronchiectasis: correlation between computed tomography features and pulmonary function tests

BACKGROUND: An obstructive defect is usual in bronchiectasis, but the pathophysiological basis of airflow obstruction remains uncertain. High resolution computed tomographic (CT) scanning now allows quantitation of static morphological abnormalities, as well as dynamic changes shown on expiratory CT scans. The aim of this study was to determine which static and dynamic structural abnormalities on the CT scan are associated with airflow obstruction in bronchiectasis. METHODS: The inspiratory and expiratory features on the CT scan of 100 patients with bronchiectasis undergoing concurrent lung function tests were scored semi-quantitatively by three observers. RESULTS: On univariate analysis the extent and severity of bronchiectasis, the severity of bronchial wall thickening, and the extent of decreased attenuation on the expiratory CT scan correlated strongly with the severity of airflow obstruction; the closest relationship was seen between decreased forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and the extent of decreased attenuation on the expiratory CT scan (R(s) = -0.55, p<0. 00005). On multivariate analysis bronchial wall thickness and decreased attenuation were consistently the strongest independent determinants of airflow obstruction. The extent of decreased attenuation was positively associated with the severity of bronchial wall thickness, but was not independently linked to gas transfer levels. Endobronchial secretions seen on CT scanning had no functional significance; the severity of bronchial dilatation was negatively associated with airflow obstruction after adjustment for other morphological features. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that airflow obstruction in bronchiectasis is primarily linked to evidence of intrinsic disease of small and medium airways on CT scanning and not to bronchiectatic abnormalities in large airways, emphysema, or retained endobronchial secretions.