Serum level of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer

AIM: To establish a method to detect the expression of the tumor specific growth factor TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in serum and evaluate their value in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: ELISA and Biochemical colorimetric assay were used to detect the serum content of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 in 200 normal cases, 52 pancreatitis patients and 96 pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS: The positive likelihood ratios of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 were 5.4, 12.6 and 6.3, respectively, and their negative likelihood ratios were 0.10, 0.19 and 0.17, respectively. With single tumor marker diagnosed pancreatic cancer, the highest sensitivity and specificity of TSGF were 91.6% and 93.5%. In combined test with 3 markers, when all of them were positive, the sensitivity changed to 77.0% and the specificity and the positive predictive value were 100%. The levels of TSGF and CA242 were significantly higher in the patients with pancreatic cancer of head than those in the patients with pancreatic cancer of body, tail and whole pancreas, but the expression of CA19-9 had no correlation with the positions of the pancreatic cancer. The sensitivity of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 was increased with the progress in stages of pancreatic cancer. In stage I, the sensitivity of TSGF was markedly higher than CA242 and CA19-9. CONCLUSION: The combined use of TSGF, CA242 and CA19-9 expressions can elevate the specificity for pancreatic cancer diagnosis. And it shows that it plays an important role to differentiate positions and tissue typing. It is a forepart diagnosis for the pancreatic cancer by combination checking. There is very important correlation between the three markers and the pancreatic cancer.     

血清TSGF、CA242、CA19-9对老年胰腺癌患者诊断作用的临床研究

目的 评价血清中肿瘤标志物恶性肿瘤相关物质(TSGF)、糖类抗原CA242和CAl9-9对老年胰腺癌患者的诊断作用。方法 采用生化比色法与酶免法分别检测200例健康人、52例胰腺炎及96例胰腺癌患者的TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9含量。结果 TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9阳性似然比依次为5．4、12．6和6．3，阴性似然比依次为0．10、0．19和0．17。单项肿瘤标志物对胰腺癌诊断：TSGF敏感性高达91．6％，CA242特异性高达93．5％。以3项均为阳性诊断胰腺癌：敏感性为77．1％，特异性和阳性预测值皆为100．0％。胰头癌TSGF与CA242水平显著高于胰体癌、胰尾癌及全胰癌，而CAl9-9的表达与其部位无相关性。TSGF、CA242与CAl9-9随着临床分期的进展而敏感性增加，Ⅰ期者TSGF的敏感性显著高于CA242与CAl9-9，因此TSGF可以作为胰腺癌早期筛选的肿瘤标志物。结论 应用TSGF、CA242和CAl9-9联合诊断胰腺癌可以提高特异性，其表达对胰腺癌的不同组织分型起到重要作用，3项标志物联合检测可助早期诊断胰腺癌。     

A clinical evaluation of monoclonal (CA19-9, CA50, CA12-5) and polyclonal (CEA, TPA) antibody-defined antigens for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

We measured in 193 patients, admitted to our wards for symptoms and signs suggestive of pancreatic or digestive malignancy, the serum levels of five tumor-associated antigens (CA 19-9, CA 50, CA 125, TPA, CEA) and we evaluated their diagnostic accuracy both when used alone and in combination. For CA 19-9 and CA 50 a sensitivity for pancreatic cancer as high as 92 and 88%, respectively, and specificity of 91.8% were found. A lower sensitivity vs. pancreatic cancer was found for the other tumor markers, and vs. the other digestive and nondigestive malignancies for all tumor markers (apart for CA 19-9 and CA 50 vs. biliary carcinomas). As for the combined assays, the best figures were found vs. pancreatic cancer for CA 19-9 plus CA 50, CA 50 plus CEA, CA 50 plus CA 125; a sensitivity by far worse vs. the other gastrointestinal cancers was found for all the possible combinations. We conclude that in selected symptomatic patients some tumor-marker determinations can be useful in identifying those with a high probability of harboring a pancreatic cancer, to be further studied or operated upon. The clinical relevance of this in patients already symptomatic is at present unclear.     

Comparison of tumor marker CA 242 with CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although there are a variety of tumor markers used for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity of those markers have not yet reached an ideal level. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of CA 242 with CA 19-9 and CEA in the patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: Serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA levels were determined in 135 subjects in the following groups: Pancreatic cancer (n = 40), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 15), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 10), cirrhosis (n = 7), chronic active hepatitis (n = 7), choledochal stone (n = 12), chronic pancreatitis (n = 9), acute pancreatitis (n = 6), and healthy controls (n = 29). RESULTS: An elevated serum CA 242 concentration (> 20 U/mL) was found in 30 out of 40 (70%) (mean; 2163 +/- 838 U/mL) patients with pancreas cancer, in 11 out of 15 patients with cholangiocellular carcinoma (93.3%) (mean 916 +/- 529 U/mL), in none of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and healthy controls. Slightly elevated CA 242 concentration was found in 6 out of 41 patients with benign hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease (range 0.4-97.8 U/mL) (1 acute pancreatitis, 2 chronic pancreatitis, 1 cirrhosis, 2 choledochal stone). Mean serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA levels of the pancreas cancer group were significantly higher than those of the other groups except the cholangiocellular carcinoma group. There was no significant difference between the stage of pancreas cancer regarding mean serum CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA level. There was positive correlation between serum CA 242 and CA 19-9 level. In the pancreas cancer, the sensitivity of CA 242, CA 19-9 and CEA was 75%, 80%, 40%, respectively and the specificity of those markers was 85.5%, 67.5% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the advantage of CA 242 compared to CA 19-9 is that its specificity is higher than that of CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreas cancer.     

������־���������ٰ���Ϻ�Ԥ�������еļ�ֵ�о�

??Abstract??Objective To investigate the roles of tumor markers in diagnosis and prognosis assessment of patients with pancreatic carcinoma.Methods We collected 198 cases of pancreatic carcinoma??50 cases of benign pancreatic diseases and 61 cases of normal controls.Radioimmunoassay was used to detect the tumor markers such as CA19-9??CA242??CA125??CA50 and CEA.A total of 120 cases of pancreatic carcinoma were followed up and the factors influencing their prognosis were analyzed.Results The average levels of CA19-9??CA242 and CA125 in pancreatic carcinoma cases were significantly higher than those in the controls and benign pancreatic disease cases (P<0.05).We obtained sensitivities of 80.84%??72.50%??56.67%??56.12% and 45.31% for CA19-9??CA242??CA125??CA50 and CEA??respectively??and specificities of 76.80%??69.32%??72.96 %??65.33% and 57.40% for CA19-9??CA242??CA125??CA50 and CEA??respectively.Combined detection increased the sensitivity but reduced the specificity.The median survival time of the pancreatic cancer patients was 5.5 months.Patients with tumors located at pancreatic body??tail and the whole pancreas had less survival time than those with tumors located at pancreatic head and neck.Patients with higher levels of CA19-9??CA242 and CA125 had less survival time (P<0.05).Cox multivariate proportional hazards model showed that CA19-9 and CA242 were independent prognostic factors (P<0.05).Conclusion Early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma depends on serum examinations of tumor marker.Combined detection increases the sensitivity and reduces the specificity of the markers.Patients with tumor located at the pancreatic body??pancreatic tail??and with higher levels of CA19-9??CA242 and CA125 may have less survival time.CA19-9 and CA242 are independent prognostic factors that may help to assess the prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma.     

A comparative study of mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), CA 125, CA 19-9 and CEA in patients with ovarian cancer

A mucin-like carcinoma associated antigen (MCA), which is recognized by the monoclonal antibody b-12, was found to be elevated in sera of breast cancer patients. Since an immunohistochemical reaction of the monoclonal antibody b-12 was found in epithelial tumors of the ovary we investigated MCA serum levels in 50 patients with ovarian cancer (mean age 59 years, range 31-81 years). In addition, CA 125, CA 19-9 and CEA were determined to compare sensitivity, specificity and the predictive value of the positive test of each parameter used in this study. Blood samples were obtained in 20 patients with progressive disease and in 30 patients during disease free intervals. The MCA serum levels of patients with progressive ovarian cancer (mean +/- SD: 14.7 +/- 14.6 U/ml) did not differ significantly from those of patients in remission (mean +/- SD: 8.2 +/- 5.3 U/ml) or from values of a healthy control group (mean +/- SD: 7.7 +/- 3.8 U/ml, n = 70). Women with progressive disease displayed significantly higher CA 125 (p less than 0.0001) and CEA (p less than 0.0063) serum levels than patients in remission. No significant difference was found for CA 19-9 in patients with ovarian cancer, irrespective of the clinical status. Considering marker surge and tumor progression, the highest sensitivity was found for CA 125 (75%). Sensitivities of the other markers were significantly lower and reached only 25-35%. The predictive value of elevated marker levels as well as specificity of the marker substances were similar. Sensitivity could be extended to 90% if elevation of CA 125, CA 19-9, CEA and MCA were taken into consideration, however specificity was lowered by using this marker combination.     

Comparative effectiveness of the tumour diagnostics, CA 19-9, CA 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with diseases of the digestive system.

Serum concentrations of CA 19-9, CA 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in 145 patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas and 89 with non-neoplastic diseases were determined to compare the clinical usefulness of these tumour markers. Significantly fewer positive cases were obtained with serum CA 19-9 (9%) and CA 125 (8%) tests than the CEA test (22%) (both p less than 0.05) in patients with benign diseases, while comparable sensitivities were achieved with the CA 19-9 (44%) test, the CA 125 (41%) test and the CEA test (47%) in those with a carcinoma. High incidences of raised concentrations of serum CA 19-9 and CA 125 were observed in case of cancer of the pancreas (CA 19-9: 87%, CA 125: 67%) and biliary tract (CA 19-9: 63%, CA 125: 48%). Combined tests of CA 19-9 and CA 125 revealed increments in the sensitivity (61%) and provided a higher specificity (87%) than that of the single CEA test (78%). These combined tests were most useful for a differential diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma (97% positive) and biliary tract carcinoma (74%) from chronic pancreatitis (4%) and cholelithiasis (0%), respectively. Studies on the relations of clinical staging and serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 125 revealed significant rises in cases of disseminated carcinoma. These results clearly show that serum CA 19-9 and CA 125 tests are most pertinent for diagnosing advanced carcinomas of organs in the digestive system.     

The Combined Elevation of Tumor Markers CA 19-9 and CA 125 in Liver Disease Patients Is Highly Specific for Severe Liver Fibrosis

Increased tumor markers in patients with liver cirrhosis are often considered to be unspecific. The use of this unspecific elevation to discriminate minimal fibrosis from severe fibrosis has never been explored. We aimed to answer the question, Do tumor markers predict severe liver fibrosis? The study group consisted of 125 patients with alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C with available liver biopsy. Tumor markers CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CA 125 were determined using routine laboratory methods and correlated with the extent of liver fibrosis. Fibrosis stages 1 and 2 were classified as minimal fibrosis; stages 3 and 4, as severe fibrosis. Tumor markers CA 19-9, CA 125, and CA 15-3 increased with stage of fibrosis. For separating patients with mild fibrosis (F1+F2) from patients with severe fibrosis (F3+F4), CA 19-9 had a sensitivity of 70.5% and a specificity of 88.6, CA 125 had 38.1% and 89.7%, and CA 15-3 had 19.0% and 93.0%, respectively. Logistic regression of a combined score of CA19-9 and CA 125 values revealed that an increase of 1 point of the CA 19-9/CA125 score resulted in a 1.6 times increase in likelihood of the presence of severe fibrosis. The CA 19-9/CA 125 score achieved a similar specificity (97.1% vs. 100%) but a higher sensitivity (42.9% vs. 33.3%) than the widely used cirrhosis discriminant score of Bonacini. A specificity (98.5%) similar to that of the CA 19-9/CA 125 score was reached by the easier determination of the combined elevation of CA 19-9 and CA 125, which had the best positive predictive value, 92.9%. The excellent predictive ability of the combined elevation of CA 19-9 and CA 125 for severe liver fibrosis (F3+F4) was confirmed in an independent group of patients with liver disease. The combined elevation of CA 19-9 and CA 125 is useful for identifying patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis with high specificity. Patients without a combined elevation of CA 19-9 and CA 125 still require histological examination to identify severe fibrosis or cirrhosis.     

胰腺癌患者血清中巨噬细胞因子-1、糖链抗原19-9、糖链抗原242及癌胚抗原的检测分析

目的 探讨血清巨噬细胞因子-1（MIC-1）、糖链抗原（CA）19-9 、CA242及癌胚抗原（CEA）在胰腺癌中的应用价值.方法 分析129例胰腺癌患者和120例健康体检者4项肿瘤标志物的检测结果,计算各肿瘤标志物组合方式对提高胰腺癌诊断的作用.结果 胰腺癌患者血清中各项肿瘤标志物的水平与对照组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.MIC-1＋CA19-9组合的敏感性与单项检测敏感性最高的MIC-1比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;MIC-1＋CA19-9组合的特异性与单项检测特异性最高的CA19-9比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）.Ⅲ~Ⅳ期胰腺癌患者血清CA19-9、CA242水平与Ⅰ~Ⅱ期比较,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.结论 4项肿瘤标志物的检测对胰腺癌的诊断均有一定的价值,MIC-1＋CA19-9联合检测可提高诊断的敏感性,同时未降低其特异性.CA19-9、CA242对判断胰腺癌的预后有一定价值.     

Assessment of serum and bile levels of CA19-9 and CA125 in cholangitis and bile duct carcinoma

In this study, CA19-9 and CA125 in serum and bile were measured to evaluate their diagnostic value in cholangitis and bile duct carcinoma. Patients were classified into three groups: group A, the control group, had cholelithiasis without infection (n = 23), group B had acute cholangitis (n = 25) and group C had bile duct carcinoma without bacterial infection (n = 18). All patients had undergone surgery, and bile and serum of the patients were measured for the two tumour markers by radio-immunoassay. The positivity rate for serum CA19-9 was 4.4% in the control group, 28.0% in group B and 61.1% in group C. The positivity rates for serum CA125 in groups control, B and C were 0%, 4% and 27.78% respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for bile duct carcinoma was 67.4% for both CA19-9 or CA125. The concentration of CA19-9 in bile was more than 1200 ng/mL in 72% of patients with acute cholangitis, in 61.1% of all patients with bile duct carcinoma and 0% in the control group. The frequency of concentrations of CA125 in bile greater than 200 ng/mL was 38.89% in bile duct carcinoma and none was observed in the control or acute cholangitis groups. In conclusion, the concentration of CA19-9 was increased not only by the tumour itself, but also by infection. In the diagnosis of bile duct carcinomas, the sensitivity of CA125 was low but its specificity was very high.     

Comparison of CA 72-4 with CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen in the serodiagnostics of gastrointestinal malignancies

Serum levels of the new tumor-associated marker CA 72-4 were measured in healthy controls (n = 64) and patients with benign (n = 410) or malignant (n = 199) gastrointestinal diseases. A cut-off limit of 4 U/ml was established. Tumor-indicating sensitivity was compared with that of the conventional markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9. In serodiagnostic evaluations CA 72-4 was clearly inferior to CA 19-9 in pancreatic carcinomas (22% versus 82%; all stages) and to CEA in colorectal cancer (32% versus 58%; all stages), with no appreciable diagnostic gain from combined determination. However, in gastric carcinoma CA 72-4 identified 59% of all patients (CA 19-9, 52%; CEA, 25%), and a combination of CA 72-4 and CA 19-9 detected as many as 70%. Positive results correlated roughly with tumor size. Compared with the other two tumor markers, CA 72-4 had a very high specificity (98%) in benign diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, including inflammatory processes, so that elevated serum levels of CA 72-4 should always be taken seriously.     

CA19-9、CA125和碱性磷酸酶对胆囊癌临床分期的意义

背景：近年原发性胆囊癌的发病率明显上升,提高胆囊癌的早期诊断是改善治疗和预后、提高生存率和生活质量的关键。目的：探讨检测CA19-9、CA125和碱性磷酸酶（AKP）对胆囊癌的临床分期以及术前评估的意义。方法：收集2003年1月~2010年5月华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院经病理检查确诊为原发性胆囊癌的159例患者,对不同TNM分期胆囊癌患者的血清CA19-9、CA125和AKP进行比较分析。结果：Ⅰ＋Ⅱ＋ⅢA期、ⅢB期、Ⅳ期胆囊癌患者血清CA19-9、CA125和AKP水平相比差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）;Ⅰ＋Ⅱ＋ⅢA期血清CA19-9阳性率和AKP异常率显著低于ⅢB期、Ⅳ期（P〈0.01）,而血清CA125阳性率显著低于Ⅳ期（P〈0.01）。Ⅰ＋Ⅱ＋ⅢA期血清CA19-9水平和阳性率以及AKP水平和异常率均显著低于ⅢB＋Ⅳ期（P〈0.01）,而血清CA125水平和阳性率均无明显差异。联合检测的阳性率明显高于单个指标的阳性率（P〈0.01）。结论：CA19-9、CA125、AKP可作为胆囊癌的辅助诊断手段,对胆囊癌的临床分期和术前评估具有较好的临床价值。联合检测可提高诊断效率。     

血清肿瘤标志物和肝功能指标联合检测在胰腺癌肝转移诊断中的价值

目的探讨肿瘤标志物和肝功能指标联合检测在胰腺癌肝转移早期诊断中的临床价值。方法选取125例胰腺癌患者,其中肝转移58例,无肝转移67例。检测患者血清肿瘤标志物和肝功能指标水平,并对结果进行分析。结果胰腺癌肝转移者血清中癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）、糖类抗原242（CA242）和乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）水平显著高于无肝转移者（P〈0.05）。ROC曲线分析显示CEA、CA19-9、CA242与LDH诊断肝转移的最佳上限为6.0μg/L、842 U/m l、64.48 U/L与220 U/L。CEA和LDH单独检测肝转移的敏感性为64.2%和51.9%,特异性为71.4%和74.2%。而CEA与LDH联合检测的敏感性和特异性为77.6%和93.5%。结论肿瘤标志物和肝功能指标联合检测特异性高,有助于胰腺癌肝转移的早期诊断。     

肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值

目的:比较血清肿瘤标志物CA242与CA19-9对胰腺癌的诊断价值。方法:1996年4月至1997年6月,北京医院对门诊及住院197例患者进行了血清CA19-9的检测,148例进行了CA242的检测,其中25例为临床明确诊断为胰腺癌,12例为急性胰腺炎,18例为良性阻塞性黄疸。结果显示:胰腺癌患者血清CA19-9和CA242较对照明显增高,其中25例胰腺癌患者有21例CA19-9阳性,检测的灵敏度为84％,特异性为74.4％,有17例CA242阳性,检测的灵敏度为68％,特异性为87.8％。CA242与CA19-9比较,灵敏度无显著差异(0.10相似文献   

Antigen detection by the monoclonal antibodies CA 19-9 and CA 125 in normal and tumor tissue and patients' sera

The tumor markers CA 19-9 and CA 125 defined by the monoclonal antibodies 19-9 and OC 125 were investigated with respect to organ specificity and tumor sensitivity. Normal and tumor tissue specimens, and blood samples from 34 patients with pancreatic carcinomas, 40 with ovarian carcinomas and 39 with miscellaneous tumors were examined. CA 19-9 and CA 125 were determined by immunohistochemistry (IH) applied to sections of the tumors and adjacent normal tissues. In parallel, the antigens were measured in the patients' sera by radioimmunoassay (RIA). By means of IH CA 19-9 and CA 125 were detected in normal surface cells from many different organs. Both antigens were also found in tissue sections of various types of tumors and in the sera of the corresponding patients. Thus, organ specificity could not be demonstrated. Sensitivity of CA 19-9 was found to be high for pancreatic carcinomas, i.e., 88% of the tumors expressed the antigen shown by IH and 85% of the sera revealed concentrations above the cut-off value (greater than 37 units/ml). Evidence for CA 125 was high in ovarian carcinomas with a tissue positivity in 83% and elevated (greater than 35 units/ml) serum levels in 70% of patients. Comparing IH and RIA case by case a discrepancy was found in 14% of cases with positive IH and low serum values a vice versa. Reasons for this finding are small tumor mass not producing elevated serum levels, retention of the antigen inside the tumor cells because of defective release mechanisms demonstrable only by IH, or heterogeneity of tumors with only focal antigen expression not present in the tissue sections investigated and thus disclosable only by RIA. The relevance of immunohistochemical detection of the antigens for therapeutic planning is discussed.     

Immunohistochemical analysis of CA19-9, SLX, and CA125 in adenoid cystic carcinoma of trachea and bronchus]

We examined the usefulness of 3 carbohydrate antigens, CA19-9, CA125, and SLX, as tumor markers in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea and bronchus, immunohistochemically and clinically. CA19-9 and SLX were detected immunohistochemically in normal tracheal and bronchial glands, but CA125 was not detected. Bronchial secretions obtained from 7 patients without cancer contained high levels of these 3 carbohydrate antigens. There was positive immunohistochemical staining for CA19-9, CA125, and SLX in 5 of 9, 1 of 9, and 3 of 8 patients with tracheal or bronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma, respectively. In a case of bronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma in whom pretreatment serum CA19-9 showed a very high level, this marker changed in parallel with the clinical course. These results suggest the possibility that CA19-9 and SLX could be used as useful markers in patients with tracheal and bronchial adenoid cystic carcinoma.     

探讨胆汁肿瘤标志物对胆管良恶性疾病的诊断价值

目的探讨胆汁肿瘤标志物对胆管良恶性疾病的诊断价值。方法160例因胆道疾病需要ERCP治疗者,ERCP时取胆汁检测胆汁肿瘤标志物（CA19-9、CEA和CA242）和细菌培养。结果恶性狭窄组与良性疾病组间胆汁和血清CA19-9、CEA、CA242水平差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;根据ROC曲线制定恶性狭窄的胆汁肿瘤标志物界限值：CA19-9239ku／L,CEA40ng／ml,CA24260ku／ml。CEA敏感度、准确度、阴性预测值与血液标志物比较差异有统计学意义（P〈O．05）。3种胆汁标志物的特异性与血清比较差异无统计学意义。胆管癌、胰腺癌、十二指肠乳头癌与胆管旁转移癌、肝癌比较CA19-9水平差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）;无论是恶性狭窄组还是良性疾病组,细菌阳性胆汁与阴性胆汁组间CA19-9水平比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论胆汁CA19-9、CEA、CA242水平对鉴别胆道良恶性疾病有一定帮助,但并不明显优于血清标志物。胆汁细菌感染可引起胆汁CA19-9水平升高,但不影响良恶性诊断结果。     

术前血清CEA、CA19-9、CA50联合检测在结直肠癌肝转移预测中的应用

目的研究术前血清CEA、CA19-9、CA50联合检测在结直肠癌肝转移预测中的应用价值。 方法选择2015年1月至2017年1月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受手术治疗的结直肠癌患者316例为研究对象,其中结直肠癌伴有肝转移的患者158例作为实验组,并按照性别、年龄等匹配结直肠癌不伴有肝转移的患者158例作为对照组。对所有患者的术前血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）以及糖类抗原50（CA50）进行检测,采用单因素及多因素分析以上肿瘤标志物单独或联合检测在结直肠癌肝转移中的预测价值。 结果单因素及多因素分析结果表明,术前血清CEA、CA19-9、CA50升高与结直肠癌发生肝转移显著相关（P<0.05）,CEA、CA19-9、CA50单独预测结直肠癌肝转移的敏感度分别为62.7%、57.4%、67.1%;特异度分别为58.2%、53.5%、56.6%。CEA、CA19-9、CA50联合诊断预测直肠癌肝转移的敏感度和特异度分别为74.3%、76.3%。 结论术前血清CEA、CA19-9、CA50升高是结直肠癌肝转移的独立预测因素,但三者单独预测结直肠癌肝转移的敏感度和特异度均较低。三者联合检测对于预测结直肠癌肝转移的敏感度和特异度均较高,可以作为结直肠癌肝转移的预测模型。     

Alpha-fetoprotein,carcinoembryonic antigen,and carbohydrate antigen 19-9-producing gallbladder cancer

We report a rare case of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9-producing gallbladder cancer with high levels of CA125 and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA II). A 63-year-old man was diagnosed with gallbladder cancer with metastases to the liver, based on ultrasonography and computed tomography of the abdomen showing multiple tumorous lesions in the liver and a thickened gallbladder wall. Laboratory data showed high levels of tumor markers: 4647.4 ng/ml AFP, 9987.1 ng/ml CEA, 11704.0 U/ml CA19-9, 847.6 U/ml CA125, and 0.2 AU/ml PIVKA II. AFP in the present case showed an increase in Concanavalin A-nonbinding fraction and an increase inLens culinaris lectin-binding fraction by affinity column chromatography. The patient died of hepatic failure. Autopsy revealed gallbladder cancer consisting of papillary adenocarcinoma and moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. By immunohistochemical staining, AFP was detected in the papillary adenocarcinoma portion of the primary focus and metastatic tumor cells in the liver, but was not detected in noncancerous liver tissue. CEA and CA19-9 were detected mainly in the tubular adenocarcinoma portion.     

联合CA19-9、CA125和CEA检测在AFP阴性的ICC鉴别诊断中的应用价值

目的探讨血清癌抗原19-9（CA19-9）、癌抗原125（CA125）和癌胚抗原（CEA）联合检测在甲胎蛋白（AFP）阴性的肝内胆管细胞癌（ICC）患者诊断中的价值。方法2014年6月~2016年6月我院收治的ICC患者60例,根据AFP检测结果,将其分为AFP阴性组和AFP阳性组,每组分别为30例。采用微阵列酶联免疫分析法（Array-ELISA）检测血清CA19-9、CA125和CEA,采用受试者工作特征曲线（ROC）下面积（AUC）分别对各标记物及联合检测诊断的灵敏度、特异度和正确率进行评估。结果30例AFP阴性组血清CA19-9、CA125和CEA水平分别为138.8（85.7~185.1）U/ml、109.6（48.4~201.8）U/ml、11.2（17.5~21.9）ng/ml,均显著高于AFP阳性组的【（38.0（16.9~75.5）U/ml、18.1（9.3~48.1）U/ml、5.5（3.1~8.5）ng/ml）,P<0.01】;两组血清肿瘤标志物诊断ICC的ROC曲线下面积均呈现出CA19-9>CA125>CEA的趋势,在AFP阴性组,各单项诊断的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.85、0.83和0.81,显著高于AFP阳性组的【（0.55、0.45和0.42）,P<0.05】;在单项诊断ICC时,血清CA19-9、CA125和CEA的最佳临床诊断截断点分别为124.89 U/ml、96.04 U/ml和11.97 ng/ml;血清CA19-9、CA125和CEA诊断ICC的灵敏度、特异度和正确率分别为（73.33%、76.67%和71.67%）、（66.67%、70.00%和68.33%）和（60.00%、70.00%和65.00%）,以CA19-9检测诊断的效能最高;两组联合检测诊断的ROC曲线下面积均高于单项指标检测的ROC曲线下面积,且都表现为（CA19-9/CA125/CEA）>（CA19-9/CA125）>（CA19-9/CEA）>（CA125/CEA）,在AFP阴性组,各联合检测诊断的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.94、0.88、0.86和0.85 ,显著高于在AFP阳性组的【（0.74、0.62、0.58和0.52）,P<0.05】;（CA19-9/CA125/CEA）、（CA19-9/CA125）、（CA19-9/CEA）和（CA125/CEA）四种联合检测诊断的灵敏度、特异度和正确率均提高,分别为（90.00%、90.00%和90.00%）、（83.33%、83.33%和81.67%）、（76.67%、83.33%和80.00%）和（70.00%、76.67%和73.33%）,以CA19-9/CA125/CEA联合检测诊断效能最高。结论我们认为,血清CA19-9、CA125和CEA联合检测可提高对AFP阴性ICC患者诊断的正确率,需要临床扩大验证。