Factors influencing choice of renal replacement therapy in European Paediatric Nephrology Units

Background

Many factors may impact upon choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for children and adolescents, including patient and family choice, patient size and distance from the renal centre as well as logistic issues such as facilities and staffing at the unit. We report a survey of factors influencing treatment choice in 14 European paediatric nephrology units.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed by consensus and completed by 14 members of the European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group on facilities, staffing and family assessments impacting on choice of therapy as well as choice of therapy for 97 patients commencing initial RRT in 2011.

Results

All units offered all modalities of RRT, but there were limitations for pre-emptive transplantation (PET) and largely adult surgical dependence for creation of arteriovenous fistulae and transplantation. The average waiting time for a deceased donor kidney was 18.5 (range 3–36) months. Full time dietetic support was available in six of the 14 units. There was no social worker, psychology, play therapy or teaching support in three, two, seven and four units, respectively. Assessment by other members of the multidisciplinary team and home visits before choice of therapy was carried out in 50 % of units, and although all patients were discussed at team meetings, the medical opinion predominated. In terms of types of RRT, 50 % of patients were commenced on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD), 34 % on haemodialysis (HD) and 16 % underwent pre-emptive transplantation (PET). Chronic PD predominated in patients aged <5 years and HD predominated in those aged >10 years. Patient and family choice and age or size of patient were predominant factors in choice of therapy with a predictable decline in renal function favouring PET and social factors HD.

Conclusions

Chronic peritoneal dialysis predominated as primary choice of RRT, especially in younger children. The PET rates remain low. The influence of surgeons predominanted, and national transplant rules may be significant. Most units had insufficient multiprofessional support, which may impact upon initial choice of therapy as well as sustaining families through RRT.     

Nephrology and renal replacement therapy in Romania--transition still continues (Cinderella story revisited).

INTRODUCTION. This report describes the current status of nephrology and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Romania, a country with previously limited facilities, highlighting national changes in the European context. METHODS: Trends in RRT development were analysed in 2003, on a national basis, using the same questionnaires as in previous surveys (1991, 1995). Survival data and prognostic risk factors were calculated retrospectively from a large representative sample of 2284 patients starting RRT between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2001 (44% of the total RRT population investigated). RESULTS: In 2003, RRT incidence [128 per million population (p.m.p.)] and prevalence (250 p.m.p.) were six and five times higher, respectively, than in 1995. The annual rate of increase in the stock of RRT patients (11%) was supported mainly by an exponential development of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) population (+600%), while the haemodialysis (HD) growth rate was stable (+33%) and renal transplantation made a marginal contribution. Renal care infrastructure followed the same trend: nephrology departments (+100%) and nephrologists (+205%). The characteristics of RRT incident patients changed accordingly to current European epidemiology (increasing age and prevalence of diabetes and nephroangiosclerosis). The estimated overall survival of RRT patients in Romania was 90.6% at 1 year [confidence interval (CI) 89.4-91.8] and 62.2% at 5 years (CI 59.4-65.0). Patients' survival was negatively influenced (Cox regression analysis) by age >65 years (P < 0.001), lack of pre-dialysis monitoring by a nephrologist [P = 0.01, hazards ratio (HR) = 0.8], severe anaemia, lack of erythropoetin treatment (P < 0.001, HR = 0.6), and co-morbidity, e.g. cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001, HR = 1.8) and diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001, HR = 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of increase in RRT patient stock in 1996-2003 in Romania was the highest in Europe, the prevalence remained below the European mean. As CAPD had the greatest expansion, followed by HD, an effective transplantation programme must be set up to overcome the imbalance. The quality of RRT appears to be good and survival was similar to that in other registries. Further evolution implies strategies of prevention, based on national surveys, supported by the Romanian Renal Registry.     

Fructosamines in uraemia and renal replacement therapy

Serum fructosamines and glycosylated haemoglobin have been examined in groups of patients with (n = 27) and without (n = 39) diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure, or undergoing renal replacement therapy. Elevated values of fructosamines were found in nondiabetic haemodialysis patients as compared to the other non-diabetic patients. The relationship between fructosamines and glycosylated haemoglobin appeared to be attenuated by uraemia. Successful pancreatic transplantation returned fructosamine and glycosylated haemoglobin values to normal.     

Continuous renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure

The management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient is extremely variable and there are no published standards for the provision of renal replacement therapy in this population. Continuous renal replacement therapy seems to be the treatment of choice because of its superior metabolic and hemodynamic control. There is better organ protection by continuous treatment but no evidence for better survival or renal recovery due to continuous treatment. The debate about optimal membrane as well as about optimal dialysis dose is ongoing. An effluent flow rate of at least 35 ml/kg/h as well as lower BUN level at treatment initiation seem to be necessary to provide better survival rate. Peritoneal dialysis is a less suitable option in continuous renal replacement of the adult intensive care patient but hybrid methods such as extended daily dialysis and sustained low efficient daily dialysis need consideration with respect to continuous hemofiltration/dialysis.     

Anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) allow for gradual solute and fluid removal. In very sick patients with acute renal failure, they may be better tolerated than hemodialysis. The major drawback to CRRTs is the need for anticoagulation to maintain filter patency. The patients who are likely to benefit from CRRTs are also at higher risk for bleeding from systemic anticoagulation. The most commonly used form of anticoagulation for CRRTs, low-dose heparin, causes bleeding in 10-50% of patients. Regional anticoagulation using protamine may reduce the risk of bleeding, but it is difficult to use. Low molecular weight heparin and prostacyclin both may partially reduce bleeding, but are difficult to dose. Regional anticoagulation with citrate is easy to use and has been shown to prolong filter life without systemic anticoagulation. It is the anticoagulant of choice for most patients on CRRT.     

Anticoagulation and continuous renal replacement therapy

More than half of patients with acute renal failure in the intensive care unit require dialysis, and the majority of them have significant hemodynamic instability. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is often the preferred dialysis modality in these patients. One requirement for CRRT is anticoagulation, which can expose patients to the risk of bleeding. However, absence of effective anticoagulation may result in clotting of the CRRT circuit and subsequently less effective treatment. While heparins are widely used for anticoagulation, because of potential side effects such as bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, alternative anticoagulation protocols should be considered. Citrate anticoagulation, regional heparin/protamine, predilution, r-hirudin, prostacyclin, and nafamostat are among these methods.     

Technical advances in renal replacement therapy

Critically ill patients are subject to several risk factors for organ injury: surgical intervention, trauma, rhabdomyolysis, hemodynamic instability, organ hypoperfusion, bacteremia and endotoxemia, sepsis and septic shock. These conditions may cause acute kidney injury (AKI), myocardial dysfunction, liver failure, coagulation abnormalities, acute lung injury (ALI), adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), bone marrow depression, loss of acid/base homeostasis, and finally, brain dysfunction. The resulting picture of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a lethal clinical entity that is refractory to all therapies in the majority of cases. According to the "humoral theory of sepsis", soluble substances circulate in blood and participate in the generation of the different disorders of MODS; thus, AKI is not the only clinical disorder observed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients nor is it an isolated syndrome. Current extracorporeal management of such patients focuses mainly on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Nevertheless, in recent years, technical evolution of extracorporeal devices led to the potential creation of multiple organ support therapy (MOST) in order to provide a comprehensive replacement of multiorgan dysfunction: hence, other organs (liver, heart, lungs) and syndromes (abdominal sepsis, septic shock) can today be consistently supported and bridged. The technical advances of extracorporeal equipment, moreover, might allow today the design of a dedicated pediatric RRT device in order to treat patients below 10 kg, with the safety and adequacy standards that are currently granted to the adult population. This review will describe the technical evolution of MOST machines and current literature available on MOST.     

Acid-base balance in acute renal failure and renal replacement therapy

The approach to acid-base balance based on the concept of strong ions, initially proposed by Stewart, is briefly overviewed. The anion gap and the strong anion gap are both discussed. Comments are made on the strong ion difference of fluids administered to patients and their impact on acid-base status will be commented. Renal failure patients have an altered acid-base balance; most commonly, a mixed type of metabolic acidosis (hyperchloraemic, and of a high anion gap) is observed. The consequences of renal metabolic acidosis are described. Finally, the impact of renal replacement therapy on acid-base balance is exposed; different modalities of renal replacement are considered in regard to their alkalinizing performance.     

Surgery for renal replacement therapy

Surgical intervention is required for long-term access for both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. As the number and complexity of patients on dialysis increases, this presents an increasing challenge. Successful renal access surgery requires both careful planning and technical skill. This article describes the evaluation of patients for surgery, explores the surgical options for dialysis modalities and discusses the common complications of these.     

Surgery for renal replacement therapy

Surgical intervention is required for long-term access for both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. As the number and complexity of patients on dialysis increases this presents an increasing challenge. Successful renal access surgery requires both careful planning and technical skill. This article describes the evaluation of patients for surgery, explores the surgical options for both dialysis modalities and discusses the common complications of these.     

Surgery for renal replacement therapy

Surgical intervention is required for long-term access for both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. As the number and complexity of patients on dialysis increases, this presents an increasing challenge. Successful renal access surgery requires both careful planning and technical skill. This article describes the evaluation of patients for surgery, explores the surgical options for both dialysis modalities and discusses the common complications of these.     

Surgery for renal replacement therapy

Surgical intervention is required for long-term access for both haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. As the number and complexity of patients on dialysis increases this presents an increasing challenging. Successful renal access surgery requires both careful planning and technical skill. This article describes the evaluation of patients for surgery, explores the surgical options for both dialysis modalities and discusses the common complications of these.     

连续性肾脏替代治疗在非肾脏疾病中应用

CRRT可应用于危重急性肾衰竭(ARF)患者,而在其他一些非肾脏疾病,如严重SIRS,MODS ,ARDS ,心肺旁路(CPB)中应用也逐渐增加,其可能机制是通过血液滤过清除炎性介质,改善血流动力学状态来改善预后。ARDS、顽固性充血性心力衰竭、脑水肿以及CPB后患者应用CRRT可连续而平稳地排除过多体液来改善脏器功能状态。持续清除毒素加上间歇性血液透析对于先天性代谢异常、严重酸中毒或肿瘤细胞溶解综合征、药物中毒、肝性脑病可能有益。     

Cost of renal replacement therapy in Turkey

BACKGROUND AND RESULTS: By the end 2000, 22224 patients were on renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Turkey. We investigated the cost of RRT in three medical faculties and one private dialysis centre. Yearly expenses were US dollars 22759 for haemodialysis (HD), US dollars 22350 for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and US dollars 23393 and US dollars 10028, respectively, for the first and second years of transplantation (Tx). In the first year, renal Tx was significantly more expensive than CAPD. However, after the first year of renal transplantation, Tx became significantly more economical than both CAPD and HD. The sum of all yearly RRT expenses for the country was US dollars 488958709, which corresponds to nearly 5.5% of Turkey's total health expenditure. CONCLUSION: Measures such as early construction of vascular access, promoting home dialysis and the reuse of the dialysers, strict control of the use of some expensive drugs like erythropoietin and active vitamin D, and also increasing the number of transplantations, especially if pre-emptive transplantation is possible, should be taken into account in order to reduce these expenses.