Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas showing fistula formation into other organs

Background

This study assessed the mechanism of fistula formation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas.

Methods

A total of 274 patients with IPMN who had been diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) at our center were enrolled. The patients with IPMN which had fistula formation into other organs were investigated retrospectively as to (1) clinical prevalence and the organs penetrated by IPMN, (2) analysis of the mechanism of fistula formation by immunohistopathological study, (3) efficacy of EUS in progression assessment, and (4) prognosis.

Results

Among the subjects, fistula formation into other organs was observed in 18 patients (6.6%) and into 28 organs. There were 7 patients (39%) in whom multiple organs were penetrated. Of 16 patients who had undergone investigation of the expression of mucin markers, 94% had an intestinal-type tumor. Of 9 patients who had undergone surgery or autopsy, 67% showed mechanical penetration without invasion around the fistula. Only papillary protrusions were seen by EUS in 4 of these patients with noninvasive papillary adenocarcinoma showing mechanical penetration. All 5 patients who had pancreatic parenchymal invasion showed a mass with a mixed-echo pattern in addition to papillary protrusions shown by EUS, corresponding to colloid carcinoma.

Conclusions

There were 2 processes in the development of fistulas in IPMN. Of those patients showing fistula formation, 94% had intestinal-type IPMN, and 67% showed mechanical penetration. Delineation of a mass with the mixed-echo pattern suggested an invasive penetration due to colloid carcinoma.     

Natural history of branch-duct type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) are consisted of two types; branch-duct type and main-duct type. Branch-duct type is more common and follows a better course than main- duct type. However, the natural history of branch-duct type IPMN has not been exactly verified yet. The aim of this study was to investigate the natural course of branch-duct type IPMN. METHODS: The medical records of 45 patients with branch-duct type IPMN diagnosed by pancreatogram were reviewed retrospectively. The mean age was 62.9+/-8.3 years old and the mean follow-up duration was 27.4+/-18.9 months. Demographic, clinical and radiologic characteristics were evaluated. The histological findings of specimens resected during the follow-up period were also analyzed. RESULTS: Ten (22.2%) out of 45 patients showed enlargement of the cysts during follow-up. Initial size of the cyst in patients with cyst enlargement were smaller than in patients without it in univariate analysis (p<0.01). Cysts less than 1.0 cm were significantly associated with cyst enlargement with odds ratio of 4.48 in multivariate analysis. Ten patients underwent surgical resection and pathologic examination revealed one carcinoma in situ and one invasive adenocarcinoma. The presence of mural nodule was associated with malignant change of IPMNs (p=0.02). None of unresected cases showed metastasis or disease-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Natural history of branch-duct type IPMNs is generally good. The occurrence of mural nodule is associated with the malignant change of the cyst but not the speed of size increment.     

Outcome of the pancreatic remnant following segmental pancreatectomy for non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

ObjectivesIntraductual papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are often multifocal and involve the entire pancreas. Because of the morbidity associated with total pancreatectomy, surgeons will perform segmental pancreatectomy, resecting only the most ‘threatening’ IPMN lesion(s). We sought to determine whether the presence of residual IPMN following segmental pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN increases the risk for subsequent development of invasive pancreatic cancer and decreases survival.MethodsData on patients undergoing segmental resection of non-invasive IPMN during the period 1991–2010 at a high-volume academic institution were prospectively accrued.ResultsOf 243 patients who underwent segmental resection for IPMN, 191 (79%) demonstrated non-invasive pathology. Of these, 153 (80%) showed the absence and 38 (20%) the presence of residual IPMN at the initial operation. Of the 38 patients with residual IPMN, eight had positive IPMN margins, 23 had radiographic evidence of IPMN, and seven had both. During a mean follow-up of 73 months, 31 (20%) of 153 patients without residual IPMN developed a new radiographic lesion consistent with IPMN and, of these, three (10%) were found to represent invasive cancer. One (3%) of 38 patients with residual IPMN developed invasive cancer. In summary, in 191 initially non-invasive cases of IPMN, four invasive cancers (2%) developed during follow-up. The mean progression-free interval in these four patients was 54 months (range: 20–99 months).ConclusionsCompared with patients undergoing complete operative IPMN clearance, patients with residual IPMN after segmental pancreatectomy do not demonstrate increased risk for the development of invasive disease or reduced survival. In patients without residual IPMN who later develop new IPMN, the risk for invasive IPMN is increased.     

Recurrent invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma of the pancreas mimicking pott disease: review of the literature

Specific information regarding intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) recurrence is limited because most series are small and the follow-up interval is short. We report an unusual case of cancer recurrence in an 86-year-old woman who had undergone a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a large IPMN in the head of the pancreas. Final pathological evaluation of the resected pancreas found a component of in situ and invasive ductal adenocarcinoma without lymph node involvement. The patient did not receive postoperative chemotherapy and was monitored with transaxial imaging at regular intervals. Nine years later, the patient developed a retroperitoneal psoas abscess that was misdiagnosed as tuberculous spondylitis (Pott disease) but was proven to be recurrent mucinous adenocarcinoma of pancreatic origin. In our review of published reports in patients who underwent resection of IPMN, we found a combined mean recurrence rate of approximately 20%.     

Current roles of endoscopy in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is characterized by intraductal papillary proliferation of mucin‐producing epithelial cells that exhibit various degrees of dysplasia. IPMN is classified into four histological subtypes (gastric, intestinal, pancreatobiliary, and oncocytic) according to its histomorphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plays a crucial role in the evaluation of these features of IPMN. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has proven to be more sensitive than computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for early detection of malignancy. The present review addresses the current roles of endoscopy and related techniques in the management of IPMN. The particular focus is on diagnosing IPMN and malignancy within IPMN, detecting pancreatic cancer concomitant with IPMN, differentiating the epithelial subtypes of IPMN, determining the optimal strategy for the management of branch duct IPMN, and discussing innovative endoscopic technology related to IPMN. The disadvantages of endoscopic examinations of IPMN and different attitudes toward EUS‐guided fine‐needle aspiration for IPMN between Japan (negative) and other countries (active) are also discussed.     

A comparative study between computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of a mural nodule in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm –Multicenter observational study in Japan

Background/objectivesThe detection of malignancy is a major concern in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The height of the mural nodule (MN), estimated using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT), has been considered crucial for predicting malignant IPMN. Currently, whether surveillance using CT or EUS alone is sufficient for detecting MNs remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the ability of CT and EUS to detect MNs in IPMN.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted in 11 Japanese tertiary institutions. Patients who underwent surgical resection of IPMN with MN after CT and EUS examinations were eligible to participate. The MN detection rates between CT and EUS were examined.ResultsTwo-hundred-and-forty patients who underwent preoperative EUS and CT had pathologically confirmed MNs. The MN detection rates of EUS and CT were 83% and 53%, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the MN detection rate of EUS was significantly higher than that of CT regardless of morphological type (76% vs. 47% in branch-duct-type IPMN; 90% vs. 54% in mixed IPMN; 98% vs. 56% in main-duct-type IPMN; p < 0.001). Further, pathologically confirmed MNs ≥5 mm were more frequently observed on EUS than on CT (95% vs. 76%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsEUS was superior to CT for the detection of MN in IPMN. EUS surveillance is essential for the detection of MNs.     

COMPARISON OF THE HEIGHT OF PAPILLARY TUMOR IN INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS BETWEEN MEASURED PREOPERATIVE IMAGES AND RESECTED MATERIAL

The height of the mural nodules and papillary tumors in main pancreatic duct or dilated branch duct is the most important factor for diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). In this study, the authors compared the height of the papillary lesions and mural nodules between the height of resected tissues and the height detected by the preoperative imaging tools (endoscopic ultrasonography [EUS] and intraductal ultrasonography [IDUS]) in 38 patients with IPMN. In 21 out of 23 cases of adenoma, and in cases with the non‐invasive cancer, the difference of the height of operative and preoperative analysis measured by EUS and IDUS was within 1–2 mm. EUS and IDUS are useful for diagnosis of degree of malignancy in IPMN.     

Size of mural nodule as an indicator of surgery for branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas during follow-up

Background

A mural nodule is a strong predictive factor for malignancy in branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, but the nodule size has hardly been considered. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a mural nodule of 10?mm was appropriate as an indicator of surgery for IPMN during follow-up.

Methods

The follow-up outcomes of 100 patients who had branch duct IPMN without mural nodules or who had branch duct IPMN with mural nodules of less than 9?mm in a tertiary care setting were investigated retrospectively. The patients underwent abdominal ultrasound (US) every 3?months and additional imaging examinations or cytologic examination of pancreatic juice when necessary. Surgery was recommended to them when a mural nodule developed or when a nodule enlarged and reached 10?mm.

Results

During an average follow-up period of 97?months, branch duct IPMNs developed mural nodules that reached 10?mm in 5 patients (0.62% per year). In one patient the IPMN was revealed to be non-invasive carcinoma by resection, 1 IPMN was shown to be malignant by further follow-up, and 3 were not resected because of refusal or the patient??s age. In 7 patients, mural nodules stayed within 9?mm. The remaining 88 patients lacked mural nodules in their branch duct IPMNs throughout the follow-up. The occurrence of invasive carcinoma around the IPMN was not indicated by imaging examinations in any patient. Univariate analysis showed that the size of the cyst at baseline significantly predicted the development of a mural nodule that reached 10?mm during follow-up (P?=?0.05).

Conclusions

A mural nodule of 10?mm is appropriate as an indicator of surgery in the follow-up of branch duct IPMN.     

Frequency of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in Patients with and without Pancreas Cancer

Purpose: To determine the frequency of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in patients with and without invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (IDAC). Methods: 82 patients underwent pancreatectomy for pancreas adenocarcinoma. 68/82 subjects underwent at least one preoperative imaging study including CT (n = 43), MRI (n = 25), or both (n = 12). Imaging studies were retrospectively evaluated to determine if IPMN was present in the gland at a location distant from IDAC. In 183 different adult patients undergoing MRI for renal mass, images were evaluated to determine the frequency of IPMN. Fisher's exact test was used to test whether the prevalence of IPMN was greater among patients with pancreas cancer than those without. Results: Five of 68 (7.3%) patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IDAC had IPMN at a site distant from the cancer. Two of 182 (1.1%) patients undergoing MRI for renal cancer had imaging evidence of IPMN. There was a significant difference (p = 0.017) in the prevalence of IPMN between patients with and without IDAC. The odds ratio for IPMN as a predictor of pancreas cancer was estimated as 7.18. Conclusion: IPMN occurs with increased frequency in patients with pancreas cancer as opposed to those without pancreas cancer.     

Localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis superimposed upon preexisting intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

A 70-year-old woman was found to have 2 cystic lesions in the head of the pancreas on abdominal ultrasonography during a routine medical examination.Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed multilocular cysts in the head of the pancreas without dilation of the main pancreatic duct.The patient was followed-up semiannually with imaging studies for suspected branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm(IPMN).At 3 years after initial presentation,hypoechoic lesions were observed around each pancreatic cyst by EUS.Diffusion-weighted imaging showed high-intensity regions corresponding to these lesions.Therefore,a diagnosis of invasive carcinoma derived from IPMN could not be excluded,and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed.The macroscopic examination of the surgical specimen showed whitish solid masses in the head of the pancreas,with multilocular cysts within each mass.Microscopically,each solid mass consisted of inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and plasma cells.Furthermore,immunochemical staining revealed immunoglobulin G4-positive cells,and many obliterating phlebitides were observed.The cysts consisted of mucus-producing epithelial cells and showed a papillary growth pattern.Based on these findings,we diagnosed multiple localized type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis occurring only in the vicinity of the branch ducttype IPMN.     

Clinicopathological features and medical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are a clinicopathological entity that is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. However, the best approach to medical management of IPMN needs to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to identify preoperative features that may be predictors of malignant IPMN, and to define the medical management of IPMN of the pancreas. METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection for IPMN of the pancreas at Kochi Medical School between 1982 and 2004 were examined. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with IPM carcinoma. RESULTS: Among the 23 patients, 12 had IPMN adenoma, three had borderline IPMN, four had IPMN with carcinoma in situ, and four had IPMN with invasive carcinoma. In multivariate analysis, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were found to be preoperative predictors of malignant IPMN. These results suggest that the following IPMN of the pancreas should be resected: (i) IPMN of the pancreas situated in the main duct; (ii) IPMN located in the branch duct if the size of the cystic lesion is >30 mm and the mural nodules are >5 mm in height by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); and (iii) the diameter of the main pancreatic duct is >10 mm by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). Careful observation of patients with branch-type IPMN with small cysts and/or without mural nodules is recommended as a management strategy. CONCLUSION: The present study reinforces the need for immediate surgical resection of malignant IPMN and suggests indicators for IPMN that should assist physicians in making decisions on treatment options.     

Synchronous pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare and low-grade malignant pancreatic neoplasm composed of poorly cohesive monomorphic neoplastic cells forming solid and pseudopapillary structures with frequent hemorrhagic-cystic degeneration. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a pancreatic exocrine tumor composed of intraductal papillary growth of mucin containing neoplastic cells in the main pancreatic duct or its major branches. In the case presented here, a 53-year-old, Japanese man was found to have multiple cystic lesions and dilatation of the main pancreatic duct in the neck of the pancreas. Histological examination revealed a main-duct and branch-duct type IPMN, of the gastric-type, involving the neck of the pancreas, associated with a 0.5 cm SPN in the caudal side of the IPMN. We diagnosed this case as synchronous SPN and IPMN. As far as we know, only one other case of synchronous SPN and IPMN has been reported. Both the present case and the previously reported case showed abnormal nuclear expression of β-catenin in SPN, whereas IPMN showed no abnormal nuclear expression. These results suggest that β-catenin abnormality is not a common pathogenetic factor of synchronous SPN and IPMN.     

Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: observations in 145 patients who underwent resection

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas arising in branch ducts are thought to be less aggressive than their main-duct counterparts, and guidelines for their conservative management were recently proposed. This study describes the combined experience of 2 tertiary centers with branch-duct IPMNs aiming to validate these recommendations. METHODS: A review of 145 patients with resected, pathologically confirmed, branch-duct IPMNs between 1990 and 2005 was conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (45.5%) had adenoma, 47 (32%) borderline tumors, 16 (11%) carcinoma in situ, and 16 (11%) invasive carcinoma. Median age was similar between benign and malignant subgroups (66 vs 67.5 years, respectively). Jaundice was more frequent in patients with cancer (12.5% vs 1.8%, respectively, P = .022) and abdominal pain in patients with benign tumors (45% vs 25%, respectively, P = .025). Forty percent of tumors were discovered incidentally. Findings associated with malignancy were the presence of a thick wall (P < .001), nodules (P < .001), and tumor diameter >or=30 mm (P < .001). All neoplasms with cancer were larger than 30 mm in size or had nodules or caused symptoms. After a mean follow-up of 45 months, the 5-year disease-specific survival for branch-duct IPMNs with noninvasive neoplasms was 100% and, for invasive cancer, was 63%. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort of resected branch-duct IPMNs shows that cancer is present in 22% of cases and validates the recent guidelines that indicate absence of malignancy in tumors <30 mm, without symptoms or mural nodules.     

Invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: predictors of survival and role of adjuvant therapy

Background

Adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been shown to improve survival. An increasingly recognized ‘subtype’ of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). It is unclear whether adjuvant treatment for invasive IPMN improves survival. This study aimed to determine the impact of adjuvant treatment in invasive IPMN.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of merged clinical databases including 412 patients undergoing resection for IPMN at two academic institutions between 1989 and 2006.

Results

Of 412 patients with IPMN who underwent pancreatectomy, 98 had invasive carcinoma. Median survival in invasive IPMN was 32 months. Adjuvant treatment did not affect median survival in node-positive or node-negative invasive IPMN. Biopsy-proven recurrence of invasive IPMN occurred in 45 patients (46%). The median disease-free interval from resection to recurrence was 27 months. Treatment of recurrences with chemotherapy or radiation therapy was not associated with a difference in survival; however, a subgroup of patients with recurrence in the remnant pancreas who underwent re-resection appeared to have more favourable outcomes.

Conclusions

An invasive component measuring >2 cm and lymph node involvement are associated with poorer prognosis. Adjuvant therapy in invasive IPMN appears to confer no survival benefit. In selected patients with recurrence of invasive IPMN in the remnant pancreas, re-resection should be considered.     

A case of minimal invasive carcinoma from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas]

A 69-year-old man was referred to our hospital for epigastralgia. He was found to have elevation of serum amylase and CA19-9. Ultrasonography, abdominal CT, MRCP, ERCP and EUS showed the cystic lesion and a possibility of an other tumor. There was a stenosis of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at the pancreas head and dilatation of the MPD from the body to the tail. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the branch pancreatic duct was diagnosed, and there was a likelihood of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. We therefore performed pancreatoduodenectomy. Pathological finding showed invasive carcinoma from an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas.     

Endoscopic diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas

Endoscopic methods are increasingly used in the diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. The two major endoscopic approaches are endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and transpapillary diagnosis. EUS‐guided fine‐needle aspiration cytology and EUS‐guided fine needle‐based confocal laser endomicroscopy have been used in the differential diagnosis of mucinous and non‐mucinous pancreatic cysts. EUS is the most sensitive modality for detecting mural nodules (MN) in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Contrast‐enhanced harmonic EUS (CH‐EUS), as an add‐on to EUS, is useful for identifying and characterizing MN. Recent studies show that CH‐EUS has a sensitivity of 60–100% and a specificity of 75–92.9% for diagnosing malignant cysts. Intraductal ultrasonography and peroral pancreatoscopy are especially useful for detecting MN and IPMN. A recent meta‐analysis showed that cytological assessment of pancreatic juice using a transpapillary approach had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 35.1%, 97.2%, and 92.9%, respectively, for diagnosing malignant IPMN. Further studies are warranted to determine the indications for each of these novel techniques in assessing cystic lesions of the pancreas.     

MANAGEMENT OF INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASM OF THE PANCREAS

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) consist of main duct (MD) type and branch duct (BD) type. The authors describe their way of thinking regarding diagnostic modalities and management for BD type IPMNs. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) provide high resolution images of main and branch pancreatic ducts. The cases with nodules demonstrated by EUS and/or IDUS regardless of the size are the indication of operation. There were 235 cases with BD type IPMN who underwent EUS and IDUS between April 1991 and June 2005. A total of 94 patients underwent surgical resection and were histopathologically diagnosed (carcinoma, 10 cases; adenoma, 64 cases; hyperplasia, 20 cases). Diagnoses of 79 cases with nodules detected by EUS or IDUS preoperatively were 10 carcinomas, 61 adenomas and eight hyperplasias. Diagnoses of 15 cases without nodules but with symptoms were three adenomas, 12 hyperplasias and no carcinoma. The authors think that the combination of EUS and IDUS is the best way for diagnosing BD type IPMNs in the present state.     

Negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been shown to be very accurate in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. The accuracy of EUS in predicting the absence of pancreatic cancer in a large series of patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer is not well documented. Our aim was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of EUS in patients with a suspicion of pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed, from our EUS database (between January 1999 and March 2003), 693 patients who were suspected of having pancreatic cancer and had EUS examinations. A total of 155 patients were found by EUS to have a completely normal pancreas. Indications for EUS in these patients included: weight loss/abdominal pain; and/or pancreatic enlargement/fullness on computed tomography (CT); and/or bile duct/pancreatic duct narrowing on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; and/or an elevated CA 19-9. Follow-up information was obtained in 135/155 (87%) patients from patient phone calls and/or physician visits and/or CT scan. The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range 8-48 months). RESULTS: No patients developed pancreatic cancer during the follow-up period. Following the EUS examination, no work-up was required in 119/135 (88%) of patients. CT scan was performed in 16 patients at 6 months post-procedure, none of which showed a pancreatic mass. The NPV of EUS in excluding pancreatic cancer in those patients with follow-up was 100%. CONCLUSION: EUS is highly specific in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer with a NPV of 100% and obviates the need for further diagnostic testing. In patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatic cancer, EUS should be considered as the initial diagnostic modality.     

Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a distinct entity characterized by papillary proliferations of mucin-producing epithelial cells with excessive mucus production and cystic dilatation of the pancreatic ducts. IPMNs have malignant potential and exhibit a broad histologic spectrum, ranging from adenoma to invasive carcinoma. IPMNs are classified into main duct and branch duct types, based on the site of tumor involvement. IPMN patients have a favorable prognosis if appropriately treated. The postoperative 5-year survival rate is nearly 100% for benign tumors and noninvasive carcinoma, and approximately 60% for invasive carcinoma. A main duct type IPMN should be resected. Surgical treatment is indicated for a branch duct IPMN with suspected malignancy (tumor diameter ≥ 30 mm, mural nodules, dilated main pancreatic duct, or positive cytology) or positive symptoms. Malignant IPMNs necessitate lymph node dissection (D1). IPMNs are associated with a high incidence of extrapancreatic malignancies and pancreatic ductal carcinoma.     

Small invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas distinct from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a highly sensitive diagnostic method for the detection of small pancreatic carcinomas.Recently, there have been some reports describing the utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) which uses sonographic contrast agent for differentiation of a pancreatic mass.This report describes a case of small adenocarcinoma of the pancreas distinct from branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in which investigation by EUS took place every 6 mo and diagnosis was made accurately by additional CEH-EUS during the followup of the branch duct IPMN.A 68-year-old female was admitted to our hospital because of a branch duct IPMN in the pancreatic body.She had been followedup by EUS every 6 mo.However, after 2 years EUS demonstrated a low echoic area distinct from the branch duct IPMN which was vaguely discernible by EUS, and accurate sizing and differential diagnosis were considered difficult on the EUS imaging.CHEUS with Sonazoid revealed a hypovascular tumor and we suspected small pancreatic carcinoma.The histopathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma (10 mm) in the pancreatic tail, distinct from the branch duct IPMN of the pancreatic body.EUS and CEH-EUS may play an important role in the correct diagnosis of small pancreatic tumors, including synchronous and metachronous occurrence of IPMN and ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.