Effect of movement on SEPs generated by dorsal column nuclei

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the voluntary movement on the amplitude of the somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded by an epidural electrode at level of the dorsal column nuclei (DCN).MethodsFive patients, suffering from chronic pain resistant to pharmacological treatment, underwent an epidural electrode implant at high cervical spinal cord level (C2) for neuromodulation. After tibial nerve stimulation, SEPs were recorded from the epidural electrode contacts, from a Cz lead, and from two electrodes placed over the 12th dorsal vertebra and 4th lumbar vertebra, respectively. SEPs were recorded at rest and during a voluntary flexo-extension movement of the stimulated foot. Beyond the low-frequency SEPs, also the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), obtained by filtering the recorded traces by means of a 1000–2000 Hz bandpass offline, were analysed.ResultsThe epidural electrode contacts recorded a triphasic potential (P1–N1–P2), whose negative peak showed a latency similar to that of the P30 far-field response obtained from the scalp. The epidural potential amplitude was significantly decreased by the voluntary movement, as compared to the rest (p < 0.01). A main HFO peak, identifiable at around 1200 Hz, was significantly lower in amplitude during movement than at rest (p = 0.008).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the epidural C2 triphasic wave is a potential arising from DCN. The low-frequency epidural SEP component is subtended by a 1200 Hz HFO, probably generated by post-synaptic events.SignificanceThe amplitude reduction of the DCN response during movement is possibly due to decreased excitability of the DCN neurons receiving the somatosensory ascending input.     

Effects of general anesthesia on high-frequency oscillations in somatosensory evoked potentials.

To determine the characteristics of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), the effect of general anesthesia on HFOs and low-frequency primary cortical responses was studied. The authors recorded SEPs elicited by median nerve stimulation directly from human brains of seven patients who underwent implantation of subdural electrodes before surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Recordings were made before and during general anesthesia. Changes in the number of HFOs and amplitude ratios of HFOs/primary cortical responses were analyzed. Under general anesthesia, the number of HFO peaks and the amplitude ratios were significantly decreased. General anesthesia induced remarkably decreased HFO activities when compared to low-frequency SEPs, suggesting that each of those originated from different generators. Possible relations between gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA)ergic inhibitory interneurons and HFOs are discussed.     

Brain-stem components of high-frequency somatosensory evoked potentials are modulated by arousal changes: nasopharyngeal recordings in healthy humans.

OBJECTIVE: Until now, the demonstration that early components of high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) evoked by electrical upper limb stimulation are generated in the brain-stem has been based on the results of scalp recordings. To better define the contribution of brain-stem components to HFOs building, we recorded high-frequency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in 6 healthy volunteers by means of a nasopharyngeal (NP) electrode. Moreover, since HFOs are highly susceptible to arousal fluctuations, we investigated whether eyes opening can influence HFOs at this level. METHODS: We recorded right median nerve SEPs from the ventral surface of the medulla by means of a NP electrode as well as from the scalp, in 6 healthy volunteers under two different arousal states (eyes opened versus eyes closed). SEPs have been further analyzed after digital narrow bandpass filtering (400-800 Hz). RESULTS: NP recordings demonstrated in all subjects a well-defined burst, occurring in the same latency window of the low-frequency P13-P14 complex. Eyes opening induced a significant amplitude increase of the NP-recorded HFOs, whereas scalp-recorded HFOs as well as low-frequency SEPs remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that slight arousal variations induce significant changes in brain-stem components of HFOs. According to the hypothesis that HFOs reflect the activation of central mechanisms, which modulate sensory inputs depending on variations of arousal state, our data suggest that this modulation is already effective at brain-stem level.     

Reduction in amplitude of the subcortical low- and high-frequency somatosensory evoked potentials during voluntary movement: an intracerebral recording study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the reduction of amplitude of the scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during movement (gating) is due to an attenuation of the afferent volley at subcortical level. METHODS: Median nerve SEPs were recorded from 9 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, who underwent implant of intracerebral (IC) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus or in the globus pallidum. SEPs were recorded from Erb's point ipsilateral to stimulation, from the scalp surface and from the IC leads, at rest and during a voluntary flexo-extension movement of the stimulated wrist. The recorded IC traces were submitted to an off-line filtering by a 300-1500 bandpass to obtain the high-frequency SEP bursts. RESULTS: IC leads recorded a triphasic component (P1-N1-P2) from 14 to 22 ms of latency. The amplitudes of the scalp N20, P20 and N30 potentials and of the IC triphasic component were significantly decreased during movement, while the peripheral N9 amplitude remained unchanged. Also the IC bursts, whose frequency was around 1000 Hz, were reduced in amplitude by the voluntary movement. CONCLUSIONS: Since the IC triphasic component is probably generated by neurons of the thalamic ventro-postero-lateral nucleus, which receive the somatosensory afferent volley, the P1-N1 amplitude reduction during movement suggests that the gating phenomenon involves also the subcortical structures.     

Comparison of somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations after posterior tibial and median nerve stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) evoked by posterior tibial nerve (PTN) and median nerve (MN) stimulation. METHODS: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded with a filter set at 10-2000 Hz to right PTN and to right MN stimulation in 10 healthy subjects. The HFOs were obtained by digitally filtering the wide-band SEPs with a band-pass of 300-900 Hz. RESULTS: HFOs were recorded in 8 of the 10 subjects for PTN, and in all subjects for MN stimulation. The HFOs after both PTN and MN stimulation started approximately at or after the onset of the primary cortical response (P37 and N20) and ended around the middle of the second slope. HFO amplitudes and area after PTN stimulation were significantly smaller than those after MN stimulation. HFO duration after PTN stimulation was markedly longer than that after MN stimulation. However, HFO interpeak latencies did not differ between the two nerves. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that the HFOs after PTN and MN stimulation reflect a neural mechanism common to the hand and foot somatosensory cortex.     

The effects of stimulus rates on high frequency oscillations of median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials--direct recording study from the human cerebral cortex.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of different stimulus rates on high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), we recorded median nerve SEPs directly from the human cerebral cortex. METHODS: SEPs were recorded from subdural electrodes in 5 patients with intractable epilepsy, under the conditions of low (3.3Hz) and high (12.3Hz) stimulus rates. RESULTS: Increased stimulus rates to the median nerve from 3.3 to 12.3Hz showed a pronounced amplitude reduction of HFOs when compared with the primary N20-P20, area 3b, and P25, area 1, responses. CONCLUSIONS: HFOs were more sensitive to a high stimulus rate than the primary cortical responses, suggesting that the post-synaptic intracortical activities may greatly contribute to the HFO generation.     

Movement interference attenuates somatosensory high-frequency oscillations: contribution of local axon collaterals of 3b pyramidal neurons.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of movement interference on high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and N20m in 10 healthy subjects.METHODS: For the movement interference condition, somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following electric median nerve stimulation were recorded during voluntary movement of the digits. For the control condition, the SEFs were recorded without interference. The N20m and HFOs were separated by 3-300Hz and 300-900Hz bandpass filtering. Then, the peak-to-peak amplitudes were measured.RESULTS: Both interference/control amplitude ratios for the N20m and HFOs were smaller than 100%. In contrast, the HFO/N20m amplitude index, which was calculated by dividing the interference/control amplitude ratio for the HFOs with that for the N20m, was significantly greater in the movement interference condition than in the control condition.CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall amplitude of the HFOs was decreased by movement, enhancement of the HFOs by the movement was revealed by the HFO/N20m amplitude index. Thus, we suggest that the HFOs represent activity of the inhibitory interneurons excited by both thalamocortical afferent impulses and excitatory synaptic inputs from pyramidal neurons in area 3b through their local axon collaterals, thereby reflecting both feed-forward and feedback inhibitory effects onto the post-synaptic pyramidal neurons.     

Different origins of low- and high-frequency components (600 Hz) of human somatosensory evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE: Human median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) contain a low-amplitude (<500 nV) high-frequency (approximately 600 Hz) burst of repetitive wavelets (HFOs) which are superimposed onto the primary cortical response 'N20.' This study aimed to further clarify the cortical and subcortical structures involved in the generation of the HFOs. METHODS: 128-Channel recordings were obtained to right median nerve stimulation of 10 right-handed healthy human subjects and in 7 of them additional to right ulnar nerve. Data were evaluated by applying principal component analysis and dipole source analysis. RESULTS: Different source evaluation strategies provided converging evidence for a cortical HFO origin, with two different almost orthogonally oriented generators being active in parallel, but with a phase shift of a quarter of their oscillatory period, while the low-frequency 'N20' is adequately modeled by one tangential dipole source. Median and ulnar derived low-frequency and HFO cortical sources show a somatotopic order. Additionally, generation of the HFOs was localized in subcortical, near-thalamic and subthalamic source sites. The near-thalamic dipole was located at significantly different sites in HFO and low-frequency data. CONCLUSIONS: The cortical HFO source constellation points to a 'precortical' source in terminals of thalamocortical fibers and a second intracortical HFO origin. Furthermore, HFOs are also generated at subcortical and even subthalamic sites. Near-thalamic, the HFO and low-frequency signals are generated or modulated by different neuron populations involved in the thalamocortical outflow.     

High-frequency somatosensory thalamocortical oscillations and psychopathology in schizophrenia

Human cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), which are presumably generated in afferent thalamocortical and early cortical fibers, reveal a burst of superimposed early (N20) high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), around 600 Hz. There is increasing evidence of an imbalance of thalamocortical systems in schizophrenic patients. In order to assess correlations between somatosensory evoked oscillations and symptoms of schizophrenia, we investigated median nerve SEPs in 20 inpatients and their age-matched and gender-matched healthy controls using a multichannel EEG. Dipole source analysis and wavelet transformation were performed before and after application of a 450-Hz high-pass filter. In schizophrenics, the maximum HFOs occurred with a significantly prolonged latency. There was also a higher amplitude (energy) in the low-frequency range of the N20 component compared with the controls. Importantly, amplitudes (energy) of HFOs were inversely correlated with symptoms of formal thought disorder and delusions. Alterations of the thalamocortical somatosensory signal processing in schizophrenia with absence of an early HFO - assumed to be of inhibitory nature - could indicate a dysfunctional thalamic inhibition with increased amplitudes of N20, paralleled by enhanced positive schizophrenic symptoms.     

Human high frequency somatosensory evoked potential components are refractory to circadian modulations of tonic alertness.

The impact of vigilance states, such as sleep or arousal changes, on the high-frequency (600 Hz) components (HFOs) of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) is known. The present study sought to characterize the effects of circadian fluctuations of tonic alertness on HFOs in awake humans. Median nerve SEPs were recorded at four times during a 24-hour waking period. In parallel to the SEP recordings, a reaction-time (RT) task was performed to assess tonic alertness. Additionally, the spontaneous EEG was monitored. The low-frequency SEP component N20 and the early and late HFO parts did not change across the measurement sessions. In contrast, RTs were clearly prolonged at night and on the second morning. EEG also showed increased delta power at night. HFOs are sensitive to pronounced vigilance changes, such as sleep, but are refractory to fluctuations of tonic alertness. Tonic alertness is regarded to be the top-down cognitive control mechanism of wakefulness, whereas sleep is mediated by overwhelming bottom-up regulation, which seems apparently more relevant for, at least in part, subcortically triggered high-frequency burst generation in the ascending somatosensory system.     

High-frequency oscillations change in parallel with short-interval intracortical inhibition after theta burst magnetic stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS) causes changes in motor cortical excitability. In the present study, somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were recorded before and after TBS over the motor cortex to examine how TBS influenced the somatosensory cortex. METHODS: SEPs following electric median nerve stimulation were recorded, and amplitudes for the P14, N20, P25, and N33 components were measured and analyzed. HFOs were separated by 400-800 Hz band-pass filtering, and root-mean-square amplitudes were calculated from onset to offset. SEPs and HFOs were measured before and after application of either intermittent or continuous TBS (iTBS/cTBS; 600 total pulses at 80% active motor threshold) over the motor cortex. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the first dorsal interosseous muscle were examined before and after TBS. RESULTS: MEPs, SICI, and HFO amplitudes were increased and decreased significantly after iTBS and cTBS, respectively. Wide-band SEPs did not change significantly after TBS. CONCLUSIONS: TBS changed the cortical excitability of the sensorimotor cortices. Changes in HFOs after TBS were parallel to those in SICI. SIGNIFICANCE: The mechanisms of changes in HFOs after TBS may be the same as those in SICI.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials and high-frequency oscillations in athletes

ObjectiveAthletes perform skilled movements during games and daily training. We hypothesized that the cortical representation in athletes differs from that in non-athletes.MethodsSomatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were recorded from seven healthy football players, seven healthy racquet players and seven healthy non-athletes. Electrical stimuli were delivered to the posterior tibial nerves and the median nerves, bilaterally. Cortical and spinal SEPs and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded. SEPs were recorded by 0.3–3000 Hz filter. HFOs were separated by 400–800 Hz band-pass filtering. SNAPs were recorded by 20–2000 Hz filter.ResultsThe P37–N45 amplitude in football players and the N20–P25 amplitude in racquet players were significantly larger than those in non-athletes. The number of negative peaks of HFOs from the posterior tibial nerve in football players and the HFO amplitudes from the median nerve in racquet players were significantly larger than those in non-athletes. The earlier an individual started playing football, the larger the P37–N45 amplitude. Neither spinal SEPs nor SNAPs differed significantly among the three groups.ConclusionsDaily long-term training brings about plastic excitation in the somatosensory cortex representation of the trained limbs in athletes.SignificancePlastic changes in the somatosensory cortex are induced specifically by physical training.     

Nonlinear interactions of high-frequency oscillations in the human somatosensory system

OBJECTIVE: The source of somatosensory evoked high-frequency activity at about 600 Hz is still not completely clear. Hence, we aimed to study the influence of double stimulation on the human somatosensory system by analyzing both the low-frequency activity and the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) at about 600 Hz. METHODS: We used median nerve stimulation at seven interstimuli intervals (ISIs) with a high time resolution between 2.4 and 4.8 ms to investigate the N15, N20 and superimposed HFOs. Simultaneously, the electroencephalogram and the magnetoencephalogram of 12 healthy participants were recorded. Subsequently, the source analysis of precortical and cortical dipoles was performed. RESULTS: The difference computations of precortical dipole activation curves showed in both the low- and high-frequency range a correlation between the ISI and the latency of the second stimulus response. The cortical low-frequency response showed a similar behavior. Contrarily, in the second response of cortical HFOs this latency shift could not be confirmed. We found amplitude fluctuations that were dependent on the ISI in the low-frequency activity and the HFOs. These nonlinear interactions occurred at ISIs, which differ by one full HFO period (1.6 ms). CONCLUSIONS: Low-frequency activity and HFOs originate from different generators. Precortical and cortical HFOs are independently generated. The amplitude fluctuations dependent on ISI indicate nonlinear interference between successive stimuli. SIGNIFICANCE: Information processing in human somatosensory system includes nonlinearity.     

Dissociation of thalamic high frequency oscillations and slow component of sensory evoked potentials following damage to ascending pathways.

OBJECTIVE: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded from the thalamus have a slow component and high frequency (approximately 1000 Hz) oscillations (HFOs). In this study, we examined how lesions in the sensory afferent pathway affect these components. METHODS: Thalamic SEPs to contralateral median nerve stimulation were recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes in two patients. Patient 1 had spinal cord injury at the C4/5 level. Patient 2 had multiple sclerosis with mid brain lesions. Seven patients with no brain or cervical spinal cord lesions served as controls. RESULTS: In both patients, the low frequency component of the SEP (LF SEP) was delayed and/or prolonged and greatly decreased in amplitude compared with controls. HFOs were recorded in both patients. The latencies of onset and peak of the HFOs were approximately the same as those of the LF SEPs and their amplitudes were similarly reduced. However, their frequency was similar to that of the control group. Cortical SEPs were absent in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: Normal frequencies of thalamic HFOs in association with increased peak latencies, and decreased amplitudes provide further evidence that the HFOs are likely due to intrinsic oscillations in the thalamus rather than high frequency synchronous inputs. SIGNIFICANCE: Thalamic HFOs are closely associated with the LF SEP but are generated by a different mechanism.     

Contribution of different somatosensory afferent input to subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials in humans

ObjectivesTo investigate the subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to electrical stimulation of either muscle or cutaneous afferents.MethodsSEPs were recorded in 6 patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease (PD) who underwent electrode implantation in the pedunculopontine (PPTg) nucleus area. We compared SEPs recorded from the scalp and from the intracranial electrode contacts to electrical stimuli applied to: 1) median nerve at the wrist, 2) abductor pollicis brevis motor point, and 3) distal phalanx of the thumb. Also the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analysed.ResultsAfter median nerve and pure cutaneous (distant phalanx of the thumb) stimulation, a P1-N1 complex was recorded by the intracranial lead, while the scalp electrodes recorded the short-latency far-field responses (P14 and N18). On the contrary, motor point stimulation did not evoke any low-frequency component in the PPTg traces, nor the N18 potential on the scalp. HFOs were recorded to stimulation of all modalities by the PPTg electrode contacts.ConclusionsStimulus processing within the cuneate nucleus depends on modality, since only the cutaneous input activates the complex intranuclear network possibly generating the scalp N18 potential.SignificanceOur results shed light on the subcortical processing of the somatosensory input of different modalities.     

Neural mechanisms of the ultrafast activities.

A brief review of previous studies is presented on ultra-fast activities > 300 Hz (high frequency oscillations, HFOs) overlying the cortical response in the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) or magnetic field (SEF). The characteristics of somatosensory HFOs are described in terms of reproducibility and origin (area 3b and 1) of the HFOs, changes during a wake-sleep cycle, effects of higher stimulus rate or tactile interference, etc. Also, several hypotheses on the neural mechanisms of the HFOs are introduced; the early HFO burst is probably generated from action potentials of thalamocortical fibers at the time when they arrive at the area 3b (and 1), since this component is resistant to higher stimulus rate > 10Hz or general anesthesia: by contrast, the late HFO burst is sensitive to higher stimulus rate, reflecting activities of a postsynaptic neural network in the somatosensory cortices, area 3b and 1. As to possible mechanisms of the late HFO burst genesis, an interneuron hypothesis, a fast inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP) hypothesis of the pyramidal cell and a chattering cell hypothesis will be discussed on the basis of physiological and pathological features of the somatosensory HFOs.     

Origins of the somatic N20 and high-frequency oscillations evoked by trigeminal stimulation in the piglets.

OBJECTIVE: In humans, the somatic evoked potentials (SEPs) and magnetic fields (SEFs) elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation contain high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) around 600 Hz superimposed on the initial cortical response N20. Responses elicited by snout stimulation in the swine also contain similar HFOs during the rising phase of the porcine N20. This study examined the generators of the N20 and HFOs in the swine. METHODS: We recorded intracortical SEPs and multi-unit activities in the sulcal area of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) simultaneously with SEFs. The laminar profiles of the potential and current-source-density (CSD) were analyzed. RESULTS: The CSD analysis revealed that the N20 was produced by two dipolar generators, both directed toward the cortical surface. After the arrival of the initial thalamocortical volley in layer IV, the sink of the first generator shifted toward shallower layers II-III with a velocity of 0.109+/-0.038 m/s (mean+/-SD). The sink of the second generator moved to layer V. The initial thalamocortical axonal component of the HFO was produced by repolarizing current with the sink in layer IV. The CSD laminar profile of the postsynaptic component was very similar to the profile of intracortical N20. The current sink within each cycle of HFO propagated upward with a velocity of 0.633+/-0.189 m/s, indicating backpropagation. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the N20 is generated by two sets of excitatory neurons which also produce the HFOs. Although the loci of synaptic inputs are unknown, these neurons appear to fire initially in the soma and produce backpropagating spikes toward distal apical dendrites. SIGNIFICANCE: These conclusions relate the N20 to the HFO and provide a new explanation of how the current underlying the N20 is invariantly directed toward superficial layers across species.     

Somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillations recorded from subdural electrodes

OBJECTIVES: To examine high frequency oscillations (HFOs) of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) recorded directly from subdural electrodes to investigate the relationship between the primary somatosensory cortex and HFOs. METHODS: SEPs were recorded directly from subdural electrodes previously implanted in 3 patients for clinical evaluation prior to surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. RESULTS: The primary sensory cortex (area 3b) was proposed as the source of somatosensory HFOs, because the distribution of HFOs recorded from the subdural electrodes agreed with the distribution of the N20-P20 components of the somatosensory evoked potential. The somatosensory HFOs showed a strictly somatotopic source arrangement. There was a polarity inversion of the prophase component and also the N20-P20 component of HFOs across the central sulcus. However, the phase was synchronized in the latter part of the HFOs. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the origins of the early and latter parts of HFOs are different, and that there was a clear somatotopy.     

Transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the somatosensory cortex - differential effect on low and high frequency SEPs.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has an influence on the excitability of the human motor cortex measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Low and high frequency (HFOs) components of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were studied questioning whether a comparable effect can be observed after applying tDCS to the human somatosensory cortex. METHODS: Multichannel median nerve SEPs were recorded before and after applying tDCS of 1mA over a period of 9min with the cathode placed over the somatosensory cortex and the anode over the contralateral forehead and vice versa in a second session. The source activity of the N20, N30 and HFOs was evaluated before and after application of tDCS. RESULTS: After cathodal tDCS to the somatosensory cortex we found a significant reduction of the N20 source amplitude while there was no effect after anodal stimulation. For the N30 component and HFOs no change in source activity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Corresponding to the results for the motor cortex a sustained reduction of the excitability of the somatosensory cortex after cathodal tDCS was shown. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrated differential effects of tDCS on the high and low frequency components of SEPs confirming the hypothesis of locally and functionally distinct generators of these two components.     

Interference of tactile and pain stimuli on thalamocortical signal processing in humans revealed by median nerve SEPs.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the interference of tactile and painful stimuli on human early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) including high frequency oscillations (HFOs) to further study thalamocortical processing of somatosensory information. METHODS: Multi-channel median nerve SEPs were recorded during (1) no interference, (2) sensory interference by tactile stimulation to digits 2 and 3, and (3) application of pain to the same digits. Spatio-temporal source analysis separated brain stem (S1), thalamic (S2) and two cortical sources (S3, S4), which were evaluated for the low (20-450 Hz) and high (450-750 Hz) frequency portion of the signal. RESULTS: Low frequency SEPs showed a decrease of activity at cortical source S3 during both conditions, while thalamic source S2 was significantly increased during pain interference. HFOs showed an increase of cortical source S3 and in trend of thalamic source S2 and cortical source S4 during both kinds of interference. CONCLUSIONS: Although the painful stimulus might not be specific for the nociceptive afferents, the present data affirm that at this early stage of sensory information processing within the primary sensory cortex (area 3b, area 1) pain is handled similar to sensory interference. SIGNIFICANCE: HFOs might represent an intrinsic "somatosensory alerting" system which reacts to both interference stimuli in a similar way, therefore indicating an interference without a qualitative evaluation.