The interaction of phenytoin and carbamazepine with combined oral contraceptive steroids.

Patients taking oral contraceptive steroids (OCS) are known to suffer contraceptive failure while taking anticonvulsants such as phenobarbitone, phenytoin and carbamazepine. We have studied the single dose kinetics of ethinyloestradiol (EE2); 50 micrograms, and levonorgestrel (Ng); 250 micrograms in groups of women before and 8-12 weeks after starting therapy with phenytoin (n = 6) and carbamazepine (n = 4). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was measured over a 24 h period for each steroid and significant reductions were seen with both anticonvulsants. Phenytoin reduced the AUC for EE2 from 806 +/- 50 (mean +/- s.d.) to 411 +/- 132 pg ml-1 h (P less than 0.05) and for Ng from 33.6 +/- 7.8 to 19.5 +/- 3.8 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). Carbamazepine reduced the AUC for EE2 from 1163 +/- 466 to 672 +/- 211 pg ml-1 h (P less than 0.05) and for Ng from 22.9 +/- 9.4 to 13.8 +/- 5.8 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). These changes are compatible with the known enzyme inducing effects of phenytoin and carbamazepine. Patients taking these anticonvulsants will need to be given increased doses of OCS (equivalent to 50-100 micrograms EE2 daily) to achieve adequate contraceptive effects.     

Pharmacokinetics of artemether after oral administration to healthy Thai males and patients with acute, uncomplicated falciparum malaria.

1. The pharmacokinetics of artemether were investigated (a) in six healthy male Thai volunteers after single 200 mg oral doses and (b) in eight male Thai patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria after an initial 200 mg oral dose followed by 100 mg at 12 h then 100 mg daily for 4 days. 2. In the healthy subjects, median (range) maximum plasma concentrations of artemether of 118 (112-127) ng ml-1 were reached at 3 (1-10) h. Thereafter, drug concentrations declined monoexponentially with a median (range) t1/2.z of 3.1 (1.0-9.6) h. The median (range) AUC and MRT values were 1.10 (0.33-4.44) micrograms ml-1 h and 8.3 (3.5-20.8) h. The median Cmax value of dihydroartemisinin, an active metabolite, was 379 (162-702) mg ml-1 at 6 (2-12) h. Its median AUC value was 6.6 (0.83-38.7) micrograms ml-1 h; the apparent t1/2.z was 10.6 (4.7-19.2) h and the median MRT value was 16.0 (5.0-41.0) h. 3. In the patients, a higher Cmax value of parent drug than those observed in healthy subjects (median and range of 231 (116-411) ng ml-1), was reached at 3 (1-3) h after the first dose. Steady state was reached after the third dose (24 h) and concentrations fluctuated over the range of 36-60 ng ml-1. The respective median (range) values of AUC and t1/2.z were 5.8 (3.76-12.9) micrograms ml-1 h and 4.2 (2.5-5.3) h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interaction between tolbutamide and ketoconazole in healthy subjects.

A possible interaction between tolbutamide and ketoconazole was studied in seven healthy volunteers. Treatment for 1 week with 200 mg oral ketoconazole increased the elimination half-life (from mean +/- s.d. 3.7 +/- 0.4 to 12.3 +/- 1.9 h) and AUC(0.12 h) of tolbutamide (from 309 +/- 27 to 546 +/- 20 micrograms ml-1 h) by 25 +/- 64 and 66 +/- 15%, respectively. The percentage blood glucose reduction was also increased when tolbutamide and ketoconazole were coadministered.     

The influence of diflunisal on the pharmacokinetics of oxazepam.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of oxazepam, 30 mg, have been studied in six healthy male volunteers in the absence of diflunisal and during continuous treatment with diflunisal 500 mg twice daily. During diflunisal treatment, peak plasma concentration of oxazepam significantly decreased from 387 +/- 18 ng ml-1 (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 241 +/- 10 ng ml-1 and total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) significantly decreased from 5536 +/- 819 ng ml-1 h to 4643 +/- 562 ng ml-1 h. The AUC of oxazepam glucuronide significantly increased from 4771 +/- 227 ng ml-1 h to 8116 +/- 644 ng ml-1 h and its elimination half-life increased from 10.0 +/- 0.6 h to 13.0 +/- 1.0 h. Renal clearance for oxazepam glucuronide was significantly reduced from 74 +/- 2 ml min-1 to 46 +/- 3 ml min-1. In vitro, diflunisal, at concentrations of 125 to 1000 micrograms ml-1, significantly displaced oxazepam from its plasma protein binding, the free fraction of oxazepam increasing by 28 to 56%. The free fraction of oxazepam glucuronide, ex vivo, increased by 49 +/- 5% (n = 3) during concomitant diflunisal treatment. These data suggest that the observed interaction between oxazepam and diflunisal results from a presystemic displacement of oxazepam from its plasma protein binding sites by diflunisal and from an inhibition of the tubular secretion of oxazepam glucuronide by the glucuronides of diflunisal.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of single oral doses of lomefloxacin

The pharmacokinetics of 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg of lomefloxacin, a quinolone antimicrobial, were examined in a single sequential rising dose, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Each of 30 healthy male subjects (6 per group) received placebo and one dose of lomefloxacin, separated by 5 days. Test results (physical examinations, laboratory and hematology panels, vital signs, neurological and ophthalmological examinations, EEG or urinalysis) revealed no clinically significant differences compared to baseline. Mean Cmax values (0.92 micrograms ml-1 to 6.99 micrograms ml-1) increased linearly with dose. Mean tmax averaged 1.13 +/- 0.5 h and mean t1/2, 7.8 +/- 1.0 h over all doses. There was a small influence of dose on the AUC0-48. Mean urinary concentrations during the first 4 h postdosing ranged from 79 to 454 micrograms ml-1. Urine concentrations remained greater than or equal to 15 micrograms ml-1 over 24 h at the lowest dose. Maximum urinary excretion rate, Rmax, ranged from 5.84 mg h-1 to 34.90 mg h-1. Dose normalized Rmax and XU96 (per cent of dose) were unaffected by dose. Mean renal clearance decreased at higher doses. In conclusion, lomefloxacin was well tolerated in doses up to 800 mg. Lomefloxacin is rapidly absorbed with an elimination half-life of approximately 8 h. The data suggest that the drug can be effectively administered once daily.     

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers.

1. Losartan (DuP 753, MK-954) is a novel, potent and highly selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The effect of multiple oral doses of losartan on digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy male subjects. 2. In a double-blind and randomized fashion, subjects received 50 mg losartan or placebo once daily for 15 days in each period. At least 7 days elapsed between the two treatment periods. On days 4 and 11 of each period, subjects also received a single 0.5 mg dose of digoxin intravenously and orally respectively. 3. Eleven of 13 subjects completed the study. Side effects were mild and transient (12 out of 13 subjects reported at least one adverse experience). During the study, no laboratory abnormalities were noted. 4. Multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of 0.5 mg of digoxin i.v. AUC(0.48h) of immunoreactive digoxin during losartan 28.8 +/- 2.9 vs 28.5 +/- 3.9 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 54.0 +/- 7.2 vs 51.9 +/- 6.5% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) and 1.09 (0.98, 1.21). 5. Multiple oral doses of losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral digoxin AUC(0.48 h) during losartan 23.6 +/- 3.7 ng ml-1 h vs 22.4 +/- 2.6 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, Cmax 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng ml-1 with vs 3.1 +/- 0.5 ng ml-1 without losartan; not significant and tmax 0.6 +/- 0.2 h with vs 0.9 +/- 0.7 h without losartan; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 51.2 +/- 6.3 vs 46.3 +/- 2.4% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) and 1.12 (0.97, 1.28). 6. We conclude that multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) do not alter the pharmacokinetics of immunoreactive digoxin, following either intravenous or oral digoxin. Furthermore, the co-administration of digoxin with losartan is well tolerated by healthy male volunteers.     

Single dose disposition of chloroquine in kwashiorkor and normal children--evidence for decreased absorption in kwashiorkor.

The single dose disposition of chloroquine was studied in five children with kwashiorkor and six normal control children after an oral dose of 10 mg kg-1 of chloroquine base. Plasma concentrations of chloroquine and its main metabolite were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (h.p.l.c.). Chloroquine was detectable for up to 21 days in all the subjects. Chloroquine was detectable in all the subjects within 30 min after giving the drug except in one subject. Peak levels were reached between 0.5 and 8 h in all the subjects (with no significant difference in the tmax between the two groups of children). Peak plasma chloroquine concentrations in the children with kwashiorkor varied from 9 ng ml-1 to 95 ng ml-1 (mean 40 +/- 34 ng ml-1). Peak chloroquine concentrations in the controls varied between 69 ng ml-1 and 330 ng ml-1 (mean 134 +/- 99 ng ml-1). The mean AUC in the kwashiorkor children was significantly lower than the mean AUC in the control children (P less than 0.001). Peak plasma desethylchloroquine concentrations in the children with kwashiorkor varied between 3 and 13 ng ml-1 (mean 6 +/- 9 ng ml-1) while in the controls the concentrations varied between 14 and 170 ng ml-1 (mean 50 +/- 61 ng ml-1). There was no significant difference in the half-life of chloroquine between the kwashiorkor children and the normal control children. The possible influence of a different binding and distribution pattern of chloroquine in kwashiorkor could not be assessed in this study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Bioavailability of terfenadine in man

Fourteen normal male subjects were given either 60mg or 180mg of terfenadine suspension in a randomized two-way crossover study. Peak plasma concentrations of 1.544 +/- 0.726 (mean +/- S.D.) ng ml-1 were obtained in 0.786 h following the 60 mg dose and displayed an AUC or 11.864 +/- 3.369 ng h ml-1. Whereas peak plasma concentrations of 4.519 +/- 2.002 ng ml-1 in 1.071 +/- 0.514 h were obtained following the 180 mg dose. The AUC following the 180 mg dose was 44.341 +/- 22.041 ng h ml-1. When 60 mg of 14C terfenadine was given to six additional subjects, the peak plasma concentrations of 351 +/- 43 ng equivalents per ml were obtained in 1.67 +/- 0.41 h and the AUC was 2297.71 +/- 310.85 ng-equivalents h ml-1. This indicates that approximately 99.5 per cent of the terfenadine related material that is absorbed undergoes biotransformation. Urinary excretion of 14C accounted for 39.89 +/- 5.29 per cent of the dose while 60.58 +/- 2.44 per cent of the dose was recovered in the feces in twelve days. Thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) examination of fecal extracts showed only a trace of material chromatographing with terfenadine. This may indicate that the 14C present in the feces is not due to lack of absorption.     

Alinidine pharmacokinetics following acute and chronic dosing.

1 Alinidine (N-allyl clonidine) pharmacokinetics were investigated in healthy volunteers following acute administration of 40 mg orally and intravenously (i.v.) and chronic administration of 40 mg daily and twice daily for 8 days. 2 After acute oral administration the following values were obtained; Cmax -- 166.5 +/- 18.5 ng/ml at 1.8 +/- 0.7 h (mean +/- s.d., n = 5); AUC -- 1122.9 ng ml-1 h; VdSS -- 190.71 and T1/2 -- 4.2 h, and after i.v. administration: AUC -- 1046.7 ng ml-1 h; VdSS -- 190.71 and T1/2 4.2 h. 3 Clonidine was identified in plasma and urine samples following oral and i.v. administration; clonidine Cmax was 0.26 +/- 0.06 ng/ml at 8.4 +/- 2.2 h and 0.5 +/- 0.2 ng/ml at 4.8 +/- 2.5 following oral and i.v. alinidine respectively. Urinary excretion of clonidine represented 0.1% of the administered dose of alinidine. 4 During administration of alinidine 40 mg daily for 8 days, peak and trough plasma levels reached steady state after day 2 (223.1 +/- 123.9 and 9.03 +/- 6.7 ng/ml respectively). During alinidine 40 mg twice daily for 8 days peak and trough plasma levels on day 2 were 356.2 +/- 92.0 and 80.0 +/- 35.8 ng/ml respectively, these levels did not change (P greater than 0.05) between days 2 and 8. Urine elimination of alinidine did not change (P greater than 0.05) between days 5, 6, 7 and 8. 5 Clonidine plasma concentration following alinidine 40 mg daily and twice daily were 0.47 +/- 0.18 and 0.84 +/- 0.21 ng/ml respectively 2 h after administration on day 2 and did not change (P less than 0.05) between days 2-8. 6 It is unlikely that clonidine formed from alinidine contributes to the pharmacological action of alinidine.     

Pharmacokinetics of oxatomide given percutaneously to healthy volunteers.

The percutaneous absorption of oxatomide gel at 5 per cent concentration was studied after single and repeated administration (85 mg b.i.d.) in six male and six female healthy volunteers, aged 25.7 +/- 0.8 years (mean +/- SEM) weighing 64.4 +/- 4.5 kg and the results compared with those obtained following a single oral dose (30 mg). The measurement of oxatomide was by means of a new sensitive and specific HPLC assay with limits of detection of 0.2 ng ml-1 in plasma and 1.0 ng ml-1 in urine. Poor percutaneous absorption was confirmed by the peak plasma concentrations which were 5.03 +/- 0.79 ng ml-1 following application of the gel for 7 days and 10.08 +/- 1.29 ng ml-1 following oral administration; the corresponding amounts of unchanged oxatomide recovered from 24 h urine collections were 1.42 +/- 0.39 micrograms and 3.93 +/- 0.92 micrograms.     

Effects of itraconazole and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a substrate of P-glycoprotein

AIMS: Fexofenadine is a substrate of several drug transporters including P-glycoprotein. Our objective was to evaluate the possible effects of two P-glycoprotein inhibitors, itraconazole and diltiazem, on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine, a putative probe of P-glycoprotein activity in vivo, and compare the inhibitory effect between the two in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a randomized three-phase crossover study, eight healthy volunteers were given oral doses of 100 mg itraconazole twice daily, 100 mg diltiazem twice daily or a placebo capsule twice daily (control) for 5 days. On the morning of day 5 each subject was given 120 mg fexofenadine, and plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of fexofenadine were measured up to 48 h after dosing. RESULTS: Itraconazole pretreatment significantly increased mean (+/-SD) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of fexofenadine from 699 (+/-366) ng ml-1 to 1346 (+/-561) ng ml-1 (95% CI of differences 253, 1040; P<0.005) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC0,infinity] from 4133 (+/-1776) ng ml-1 h to 11287 (+/-4552) ng ml-1 h (95% CI 3731, 10575; P<0.0001). Elimination half-life and renal clearance in the itraconazole phase were not altered significantly compared with those in the control phase. In contrast, diltiazem pretreatment did not affect Cmax (704+/-316 ng ml-1, 95% CI -145, 155), AUC0, infinity (4433+/-1565 ng ml-1 h, 95% CI -1353, 754), or other pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine. CONCLUSIONS: Although some drug transporters other than P-glycoprotein are thought to play an important role in fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, itraconazole pretreatment increased fexofenadine exposure, probably due to the reduced first-pass effect by inhibiting the P-glycoprotein activity. As diltiazem pretreatment did not alter fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, therapeutic doses of diltiazem are unlikely to affect the P-glycoprotein activity in vivo.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nimodipine in normal and impaired renal function

Twelve patients with different degrees of renal function were investigated. Six of them had moderately impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate-GFR 20-60 ml/min) and six were preuraemic (GFR less than 20 ml/min). Patients received a single oral dose of 30 mg nimodipine on the first and eighth day, from the second to the seventh day they received 30 mg thrice daily. The results of this study were compared with the data of a similar study with six healthy volunteers (GFR greater than 90 ml/min) who also received for one week nimodipine 40 mg three times daily. In these subjects peak plasma levels of nimodipine ranged between 15.5 and 106.7 micrograms/1 on first treatment day and did not differ significantly from those on the 7th day of therapy ranging between 17.0 and 80 micrograms/1. Mean terminal elimination half-life of nimodipine was 2.77 +/- 0.46 h in normal renal function, but was 22.23 +/- 6.94 h in patients with impaired renal function (12 patients with GFR less than 60 ml/min). The mean area under the plasma level time curve (AUC) with 541.5 +/- 16.93 ng ml-1 h increased in patients with renal insufficiency compared to those with normal renal function (74.65 +/- 9.44 ng ml-1 h). Dosage adjustment of nimodipine appears to be necessary in renal failure.     

The effect of administration of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of isoxicam

This study was designed to determine whether the disposition of isoxicam is influenced by the coadministration of another acidic drug, highly bound to plasma proteins and extensively metabolized, i.e., phenytoin. Ten healthy volunteers received an oral dose of 200 mg of isoxicam prior to and following the oral administration of phenytoin (100 mg) twice a day for 10 days. Eleven blood samples were drawn during the period following each dose of isoxicam. The area under the isoxicam plasma concentration-time curve (AUC infinity) increased from 389 +/- 66 to 464 +/- 62 micrograms h ml-1 (+/- SEM) (p less than 0.05) after treatment with phenytoin. This increase was due to an increase in isoxicam bioavailability; the absorption rate constant for isoxicam increased correspondingly from 0.34 +/- 0.06 to 1.16 +/- 0.38 h-1 (p less than 0.05). Distribution and clearance of isoxicam were probably not affected as its half-life was not changed, its plasma peak concentration increased, and the time to reach this peak decreased. It is concluded that phenytoin increases the rate and extent of absorption of isoxicam.     

Enhanced metabolism of mexiletine after phenytoin administration.

1 Unexpectedly low plasma concentrations of mexiletine were observed in three patients treated with mexiletine and concurrently taking phenytoin. 2 Six healthy volunteers were given a single oral dose of mexiletine (400 mg), before and after 1 week of phenytoin administration (300 mg/day). 3 The mean +/- s.d. area under the plasma mexiletine concentration-time curve decreased from 17.67 +/- 6.21 to 8.01 +/- 3.64 micrograms ml-1 h (P less than 0.003). 4 The mean +/- s.d. half-life of elimination of mexiletine decreased from 17.2 +/- 5.26 to 8.4 +/- 4.17 h (P less than 0.02) 5 The suggested mechanism of the interaction is hepatic mixed-function oxidase enzyme induction by phenytoin. 6 The interaction is likely to be clinically significant.     

The comparative pharmacokinetics and gastric toxicity of bezafibrate and ciprofibrate in the rat

1. The comparative gastric toxicology and pharmacokinetics of two phenoxyisobutyrate derivatives have been evaluated in the Fischer rat. 2. After oral administration of single daily doses for 7 days, the plasma elimination half-life for bezafibrate was rapid (t1/2 of 4-5 h) in comparison to ciprofibrate (t1/2 of 76 h). 3. The area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) 0-24 (micrograms.h/ml +/- SD) for bezafibrate (dose 125 mg/kg per day) was 1553 +/- 334, which was less than half the value of 3748 +/- 358 achieved by ciprofibrate (10 mg/kg per day) after 7 days. 4. Oral administration of ciprofibrate at 10 mg/kg every 48 h produced similar sustained plasma concentrations to those achieved by bezafibrate 125 mg/kg dosed every 12 h. The AUC 0-48 values (micrograms.h/ml +/- SD) achieved were 5124 +/- 450 for bezafibrate compared to 4207 +/- 240 for ciprofibrate. 5. In chronic oral multidose studies with ciprofibrate and bezafibrate, similar gastric toxicity (neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia) occurred in the rat when dose regimens were adjusted to compensate for the pharmacokinetic differences between these two drugs.     

The influence of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil.

The influence of cimetidine pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been studied in 15 ambulant patients with carcinoma. Neither pretreatment with a single dose of cimetidine (400 mg) nor with daily treatment at 1000 mg for 1 week altered 5FU pharmacokinetics. Pretreatment with cimetidine for 4 weeks (1000 mg daily) led to increased peak plasma concentrations of 5FU and also area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The peak plasma concentration after oral 5FU was increased by 74% from 18.7 +/- 4.5 micrograms/ml (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 32.6 +/- 4.4 micrograms/ml (P less than 0.05) and AUC was increased by 72% from 528 +/- 133 micrograms/ml-1 min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 911 +/- 152 micrograms ml-1 min (P less than 0.05). After intravenous 5FU, AUC was increased by 27% from 977 +/- 96 micrograms ml-1 min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 1353 +/- 124 micrograms ml-1 min (P less than 0.01). Total body clearance for 5FU following intravenous administration was decreased by 28% from 987 +/- 116 ml/min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 711 +/- 87 ml/min (P less than 0.01). The elimination half-life of 5FU was not altered by cimetidine. The basis of the interaction between 5FU and cimetidine is uncertain but probably a combination of inhibited drug metabolism and reduced liver blood flow. The therapeutic implications are considerable and additional care should be taken in patients receiving the two drugs concomitantly.     

Nonlinear accumulation of propranolol enantiomers.

The accumulation of (+)- and (-)-propranolol was investigated in nine subjects who received 160 mg of racemic propranolol as a single dose and then once daily for 7 days. The serum concentrations of propranolol enantiomers were measured by h.p.l.c. using a novel chiral stationary phase allowing direct resolution of underivatized propranolol. The (+)-propranolol AUC increased from 412 +/- 223 ng ml-1 h after single doses (0-infinity) to 584 +/- 279 ng ml-1 h at steady-state (0-24 h) (P less than 0.05). Similarly, (-)-propranolol AUC increased from 609 +/- 304 to 777 +/- 370 ng ml-1 h (P less than 0.05). The AUC ratio (-)/(+) was 1.52 +/- 0.36 and 1.32 +/- 0.17 after single doses and steady-state, respectively (P greater than 0.05). Therefore, nonlinear accumulation occurs with both enantiomers although there is a trend for the (-)/(+) ratio to decrease at steady-state.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the nifedipine/co-dergocrine combination in impaired liver and renal function.

Following a single oral dose of 20 mg nifedipine combined with 2 mg co-dergocrine to 24 subjects, the pharmacokinetics of this drug were studied. 8 normotensive subjects had normal renal and hepatic function, 8 patients had chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 30 ml.min-1) and 8 patients had liver cirrhosis which was confirmed by liver biopsy. The area under the plasma level time curve (AUC infinity) of co-dergocrine increased from 0.59 +/- 0.41 ng.ml-1. (mean +/- SD) in the normals to 1.24 +/- 0.95 ng.ml-1.h in liver cirrhosis (P less than 0.05) and to 1.81 +/- 0.9 ng.ml-1.h in renal failure (P less than 0.05 compared with the control group). Corresponding values for the nifedipine AUC infinity were 564.5 +/- 268 ng.ml-1.h, 1547.5 +/- 1134 (P less than 0.05) and 929 +/- 533 ng.ml-1.h (P less than 0.05; gas chromatographic method). The incidence of adverse effects was lower in patients with renal failure than in subjects with normal renal and liver function as well as in those with liver cirrhosis.     

Single dose pharmacokinetics of proguanil and its metabolites in healthy subjects.

1. Plasma and whole blood concentrations of proguanil and its two major metabolites cycloguanil (CG) and 4-chlorophenylbiguanide (CPB) were measured by a sensitive h.p.l.c. technique in nine healthy adult male volunteers after a single oral dose of proguanil 200 mg. 2. Proguanil was absorbed with a median time to peak plasma concentration of 3 h (range 2-4 h). 3. Peak plasma concentrations of proguanil ranged between 150 and 220 (median 170) ng ml-1 compared with 12 to 69 (median 41) ng ml-1 for the active antimalarial metabolite CG, and 3 to 16 (median 11) ng ml-1 for CPB. Peak (mean +/- s.d.) plasma CG concentrations occurred 5.3 +/- 0.9 h and peak CPB concentrations occurred 6.3 +/- 1.4 h after oral administration of proguanil. 4. Whole blood concentrations of proguanil were approximately five times higher, and whole blood CPB concentrations were four times higher than corresponding plasma values, whereas plasma and whole blood concentrations of CG were similar. 5. A triexponential function was fitted to these data; mean (+/- s.d.) values for the AUC were 3046 +/- 313 ng ml-1 h for proguanil, 679 +/- 372 ng ml-1 h for CG and 257 +/- 155 ng ml-1 h for CPB. 6. Plasma and whole blood concentrations of proguanil and its metabolites declined in parallel with terminal elimination half-lives estimated as 16.1 +/- 2.9 h and 15.7 +/- 2.4 h, respectively. Mean residence times in plasma and whole blood were estimated as 21.2 +/- 4.9 and 19.3 +/- 2.4 h.     

Cimetidine does not influence the metabolism of the H1-receptor antagonist ebastine to its active metabolite carebastine.

Ebastine is an H1-receptor antagonist with a relative lack of sedating properties. It is almost completely converted to carebastine, and it is this metabolite which is responsible for the antihistaminic effect. Twelve healthy subjects received a single 20 mg dose of ebastine on day 2 of a multiple oral dosing regimen of either cimetidine (400 mg three times daily and 800 mg in the evening on the day preceding ebastine administration and 400 mg four times daily on the 2 following days) or placebo in a randomised cross-over design. Significant plasma concentrations of ebastine were not detected after either treatment. The AUC of carebastine was not affected by cimetidine coadministration (4049 +/- 985 ng ml-1 h after cimetidine vs 3795 +/- 959 ng ml-1 h after placebo; 95% confidence interval of the difference: -412 to 919). Cimetidine coadministration did not induce any effect of ebastine on blood pressure and heart rate or cause sedation.