Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole versus tamoxifen.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of elevated serum HER-2/neu on the response of metastatic breast cancer patients to an aromatase inhibitor versus an antiestrogen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-two estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients were randomized to first-line hormone therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. An automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect serum HER-2/neu. RESULTS: For patients with normal serum HER-2/neu (70.5%), objective response rate (ORR; 39% in letrozole-treated patients v 26% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.008), clinical benefit (CB; 57% v 45%; P =.016), time to progression (TTP; median, 12.2 v 8.5 months; P =.0019), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.6 v 6.2 months; P =.0066) were significantly better in patients treated with letrozole. In the elevated HER-2/neu group (29.5%), there was no significant difference in ORR (17% in letrozole-treated patients v 13% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.45) or CB (33% v 26%; P =.31), but there was a strong trend in favor of a longer TTP with letrozole (median, 6.1 v 3.3 months; P =.0596) and a significantly longer TTF with letrozole (median, 6.0 v 3.2 months; P =.0418). Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated serum HER-2/neu was a negative predictor for ORR and TTP. CONCLUSION: Patients with normal serum HER-2/neu receiving letrozole demonstrated a significantly greater ORR and CB and longer TTP and TTF than patients receiving tamoxifen. Although in patients with elevated serum HER-2/neu there was no significant difference between letrozole and tamoxifen in ORR or CB, there was a strong trend favoring longer TTP and significantly longer TTF with letrozole.     

Efficacy of first-line letrozole versus tamoxifen as a function of age in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, in regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR), of letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel Switzerland), an oral aromatase inhibitor, with that of tamoxifen (Tamofen; Leiras OY; Turku, Finland) as first-line therapy in younger (<70 years) and older (>/=70 years) postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg letrozole (n = 453) or 20 mg tamoxifen (n = 454) once daily in a double-blind, multicenter, international trial. Among the prospectively planned analyses were analyses of TTP and ORR by age (<70 and >/=70 years). The results of these prospectively planned analyses are reported here. RESULTS: Letrozole was as effective in older postmenopausal women (>/=70 years of age) as it was in younger postmenopausal women (<70 years of age). The overall ORR in the older subgroup was significantly higher in patients treated with letrozole (38%) than in patients treated with tamoxifen (18%). In the younger subgroup of postmenopausal patients, the ORRs were not significantly different (letrozole, 26%; tamoxifen, 22%). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen in both age groups (younger: letrozole median TTP, 8.8 months; tamoxifen, 6.0 months; older: letrozole median TTP, 12.2 months; tamoxifen, 5.8 months). Although age was independently prognostic of TTP, there was no significant effect of age on ORR in the presence of other factors. CONCLUSION: The data show that letrozole, 2.5 mg once daily, is as effective in older, postmenopausal women as it is in younger postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. In addition, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen in both younger and older patients.     

Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To analyze overall survival (OS) and update efficacy data for letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned 916 patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown tumors letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 458) or tamoxifen 20 mg (n = 458) daily until disease progression. Optional cross-over was permitted at the treating physician's discretion. This report updates efficacy at a median follow-up of 32 months. RESULTS: The superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen was confirmed for time to progression (median, 9.4 v 6.0 months, respectively; P <.0001), time to treatment failure (median, 9 v 5.7 months, respectively; P <.0001), overall objective response rate (32% v 21%, respectively; P =.0002), and overall clinical benefit. Median OS was slightly prolonged for the randomized letrozole arm (34 v 30 months, respectively). Although this difference in OS is not significant, survival was improved in the randomized letrozole arm over the first 2 years of the study. Approximately one half of the patients in each arm crossed over. Total duration of endocrine therapy ("time to chemotherapy") was significantly longer (P =.005) for patients initially on letrozole (median, 16 months) than for patients initially on tamoxifen (median, 9 months). Time to worsening of Karnofsky performance score was significantly delayed with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (P =.001). CONCLUSION: This study documents the superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of a North American multicenter randomized trial. Arimidex Study Group.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, and Macclesfield, United Kingdom) and tamoxifen were compared as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 353 postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was designed to evaluate anastrozole 1 mg once daily relative to tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors or tumors of unknown receptor status who were eligible for endocrine therapy. Primary end points were objective response (OR), defined as complete (CR) or partial (PR) response, time to progression (TTP), and tolerability. RESULTS: Anastrozole was as effective as tamoxifen in terms of OR (21% v 17% of patients, respectively), with clinical benefit (CR + PR + stabilization > or = 24 weeks) observed in 59% of patients on anastrozole and 46% on tamoxifen (two-sided P =.0098, retrospective analysis). Anastrozole had a significant advantage over tamoxifen in terms of TTP (median TTP of 11.1 and 5.6 months for anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively; two-sided P =.005). The tamoxifen:anastrozole hazards ratio was 1.44 (lower one-sided 95% confidence limit, 1.16). Both treatments were well tolerated. However, thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding were reported in fewer patients who received anastrozole compared with those who received tamoxifen (4.1% v 8.2% [thromboembolic events] and 1.2% v 3.8% [vaginal bleeding], respectively). CONCLUSION: Anastrozole satisfied the predefined criteria for equivalence to tamoxifen. Furthermore, we observed both a significant increase in TTP and a lower incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding with anastrozole. These findings indicate that anastrozole should be considered as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Letrozole in advanced breast cancer: the PO25 trial

Tamoxifen has been a standard first-line endocrine therapy for post-menopausal women with hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer, but more than half of patients fail to respond and time to progression is less than 12 months in responders. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors were developed to provide more effective alternatives to tamoxifen. In the Femara Study PO25, post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive letrozole 2.5 mg (n=453) or tamoxifen 20 mg (n=454) given orally daily until progressive disease occurred. Patients were permitted to cross over to the other treatment at progression. In the primary efficacy analysis, median time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer with letrozole than with tamoxifen (9.4 months vs. 6.0 months, respectively; P<0.0001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher for letrozole than for tamoxifen (32% vs. 21%; P=0.0002). Prospectively planned analyses of the intent-to-treat population showed that letrozole significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with tamoxifen over the first 24 months of the trial. An exploratory analysis of patients, who did not cross over, indicated a median OS benefit of 14 months for letrozole compared with tamoxifen. Letrozole is the only third-generation aromatase inhibitor that has demonstrated significant improvements in ORR, TTP, and early OS.     

Superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: evidence from metastatic subgroups and a test of functional ability

PURPOSE: The letrozole study 025 is a large (n = 907), international, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. This subanalysis compares the efficacies of letrozole and tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausual women with advanced breast cancer according to site of metastatic lesions and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to once-daily oral letrozole (2.5 mg; Femara; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel, Switzerland) or tamoxifen (20 mg; Tamofen; Leiras OY; Turku, Finland). Time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Treatments were compared by Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Letrozole treatment significantly prolonged TTP in all subsets of patients: those with nonvisceral metastases, those with visceral metastases without liver involvement, and those with liver metastases. The reduction in risk of progression ranged from 25%, for patients with nonvisceral metastases, to 36%, for patients with liver metastases. The distributions of baseline KPS scores for both treatment groups were similar (57% had KPS scores >/=90). Time to worsening of 20 points or more in KPS score was significantly longer with letrozole than with tamoxifen, but modest numbers of patients experienced such deterioration (letrozole, 20%, tamoxifen, 22%, in patients without visceral metastases; 23%-24% in patients with liver metastases; and letrozole, 14%, tamoxifen, 30%, in patients with visceral metastases without liver involvement). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the consistent superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen and support the use of letrozole as a new standard of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 429) were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (n = 214) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (n = 215) on day 1, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. RESULTS: Time to progression (TTP; primary end point) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were significantly longer with AT than AC (median TTP, 37.3 v 31.9 weeks; log-rank P =.014; median TTF, 25.6 v 23.7 weeks; log-rank P =.048). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly greater for patients taking AT (59%, with 10% complete response [CR], 49% partial response [PR]) than for those taking AC (47%, with 7% CR, 39% PR) (P =.009). The ORR was also higher with AT in patients with visceral involvement (58% v 41%; liver, 62% v 42%; lung, 58% v 35%), three or more organs involved (59% v 40%), or prior adjuvant CT (53% v 41%). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in both arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was frequent in both groups, although febrile neutropenia and infections were more frequent for patients taking AT (respectively, 33% v 10%, P <.001; 8% v 2%, P =.01). Severe nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both groups, including grade 3/4 cardiac events (AT, 3%; AC, 4%). CONCLUSION: AT significantly improves TTP and ORR compared with AC in patients with MBC, but there is no difference in OS. AT represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.     

New generation aromatase inhibitors--from the advanced to the adjuvant setting

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are a class of compounds that inhibit the cytochrome P450 aromatase enzyme that mediates conversion of androgens to estrogen in the adrenal gland. AIs have been approved for second-line and, more recently, first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The most recent, third generation of AIs are the non-steroidal agents anastrozole ('Arimidex') and letrozole, and the steroidal compound exemestane. As second-line therapy, anastrozole demonstrated a significant survival advantage over megestrol acetate (26.7 months v.s. 22.5 months; p < 0.025). Exemestane also produced better survival than megestrol acetate, although these data were less mature. Letrozole 2.5 mg has not demonstrated a survival advantage versus megestrol acetate in the second-line setting. As first-line therapy, anastrozole has demonstrated significant superiority in response rates with respect to time to progression (TTP) (11.1 months v.s. 5.6 months; p = 0.005) and has also demonstrated significantly greater clinical benefit rates compared with tamoxifen (59.1% v.s. 45.6%; p = 0.0098). Letrozole has also demonstrated significantly longer TTP than tamoxifen in the first-line setting (9.5 months v.s. 6 months; p = 0.0001). Important differences between the pharmacological profiles of these agents have been noted, particularly with respect to their effects on glucocorticoid metabolism; data for individual agents should not be extrapolated from one to another, particularly in the adjuvant setting.     

Approval summary: letrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ) is a nonsteroidal inhibitor of aromatase enzyme complex. It inhibits the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens to estrogens. In postmenopausal women, letrozole decreases plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate by 75-95% from baseline with maximal suppression achieved within 2-3 days of treatment initiation. Suppression is dose related, with doses of >or=0.5 mg giving estrone and estrone sulfate values that were often below assay detection limits. At clinically used dosage, letrozole does not impair adrenal synthesis of glucocorticoids or aldosterone. In 1998, letrozole was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, with hormone receptor positive or unknown breast cancer, who had failed one prior antiestrogen treatment (i.e., for "second-line" treatment). Approval was based on two randomized trials comparing tumor RRs of patients receiving 0.5 mg of letrozole, 2.5 mg of letrozole, and either megestrol acetate (MA) or aminoglutethimide. In the megestrol trial, 2.5 mg/day letrozole was superior to 0.5 mg of letrozole and MA (RRs 24, 13, and 16%, respectively), whereas in the aminoglutethimide trial, there was no significant difference in 2.5 mg of letrozole and 0.5 mg of letrozole RRs (20 and 17%). There was a trend toward RR superiority of 2.5 mg of letrozole over aminoglutethimide (P = 0.06). Letrozole (2.5 mg) was the dose chosen for comparison with tamoxifen in the first-line setting. In July 2000, a marketing application for first-line letrozole treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer was submitted to the FDA. A single double-blind, double dummy, randomized, and multicenter trial compared 2.5 mg of letrozole to 20 mg of tamoxifen (456 patients/arm). Letrozole was superior to tamoxifen with regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (RR). The median TTP for letrozole treatment was 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-12.2] versus 6.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5) for tamoxifen, P = 0.0001, hazard ratio 0.713, (95% CI 0.61-0.84). RR was 32% for letrozole versus 21% for tamoxifen (odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.34, P = 0.0003). Preliminary survival data (survival data are still blinded) indicate that letrozole is unlikely to be worse than tamoxifen. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. On the basis of these results, the United States FDA approved letrozole tablets, 2.5 mg/day, for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The manufacturer made a commitment to provide updated information on survival.     

依西美坦治疗他莫昔芬失败的绝经后晚期乳腺癌的临床研究

目的:评估依西美坦用于他莫昔芬治疗失败的绝经后晚期乳腺癌的有效性和安全性。主要终点指标是客观 肿瘤缓解率(ORR),次要终点指标是肿瘤缓解持续时间(DTR)、肿瘤进展时间(TTP)、肿瘤治疗失败时间(TTF)、安全性评估 和毒副反应。方法:对入组的23例患者进行为期2年的开放、随机、平行对照研究,其中依西美坦组和甲地孕酮组的例数分别 是11例和12例;中位年龄为59岁和54岁,均为绝经后晚期乳腺癌,有可评价病灶。依西美坦25mg或甲地孕酮160mg,均为 每日1次口服。研究药物将至少应用8周(除非肿瘤迅速进展或出现难以接受的毒性),最长至26周。肿瘤评估在治疗的第 8、16和26周进行。患者在26周治疗后的继续治疗将按照另外一个随机方案进行。结果:依西美坦组与甲地孕酮组ORR分 别为18.2%和16.7%(P>0.05),但依西美坦组DTR、TTP和TTF比甲地孕酮组更长(P<0.05)。给予依西美坦的患者总体 生存率长于甲地孕酮组。与药物相关或不确定的不良事件包括:颜面潮红、乏力、出汗增多和食欲增加,体重增加患者(> 10%基础体重)甲地孕酮组为25.0%,依西美坦组为9.1%(P<0.05)。结论:对国人他莫昔芬治疗失败的绝经后晚期乳腺癌 患者,采用芳香化酶抑制剂依西美坦治疗安全有效,是一个新的选择。     

A randomised study of CGS 16949A (fadrozole) versus tamoxifen in previously untreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND:: Fadrozole, a potent, highly specific inhibitor of aromataseactivity, has only been used as second-line therapy in treatmentof post-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. A prospectivelyrandomised study was therefore undertaken to compare relativeclinical efficacy of fadrozole as first-line treatment to thatof tarnoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Eighty postmenopausal women who had not received prior treatmentfor advanced/metastatic breast cancer were randomised to receiveeither fadrozole, 1 mg twice daily, or tamoxifen, 20 mg daily. RESULTS:: Toxicity was not statistically different on the two treatmentarms. Only mild to moderate toxicity was documented: hot flashesin 37%, headaches in 6.5%, mild fatigue in 2.6%. There werealso no statistically significant differences in objective responserates, survival or time to treatment failure (TTF). Objectiveresponse rate on fadrozole was 50% (complete response (CR) 8.3%and partial response (PR) 42%). On tamoxifen objective responsewas 44.7% (CR 21% and PR 24%). Median TTF was 4.9 months onfadrozole and 5 months on tamoxifen. Median survival was 22.7months on fadrozole and 27.5 months on tamoxifen. CONCLUSION:: While response rates, survival and TTF were not statisticallysignificantly different, there were more complete responseson tamoxifen and duration of objective response (CR + PR) wassignificantly longer in the patients treated with tamoxifen. breast cancer, fadrozole, postmenopausal, tamoxifen     

Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant (formerly ICI 182,780) with anastrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in patients whose disease progresses on prior endocrine treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, postmenopausal patients were randomized to receive either an intramuscular injection of fulvestrant 250 mg once monthly or a daily oral dose of anastrozole 1 mg. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included objective response (OR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and tolerability. RESULTS: Patients (n = 400) were followed for a median period of 16.8 months. Fulvestrant was as effective as anastrozole in terms of TTP (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95.14% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.14; P =.43); median TTP was 5.4 months with fulvestrant and 3.4 months with anastrozole. OR rates were 17.5% with both treatments. Clinical benefit rates (complete response + partial response + stable disease > or = 24 weeks) were 42.2% for fulvestrant and 36.1% for anastrozole (95% CI, -4.00% to 16.41%; P =.26). In responding patients, median DOR (from randomization to progression) was 19.0 months for fulvestrant and 10.8 months for anastrozole. Using all patients, DOR was significantly greater for fulvestrant compared with anastrozole; the ratio of average response durations was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.67; P < 0.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant was at least as effective as anastrozole, with efficacy end points slightly favoring fulvestrant. Fulvestrant represents an additional treatment option for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease progresses on tamoxifen therapy.     

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-dependent advanced breast cancer: a prospective,randomized, phase III study

A prospective phase III trial comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal, hormone-dependent, advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients were randomized to anastrozole 1 mg daily (n = 121) or tamoxifen 40 mg daily (n = 117). Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated after 3 months' therapy, and survival was evaluated at median time of follow-up. At a median follow-up of 13.3 months, clinical benefit (CB) was achieved in 83% and 56% of anastrozole and tamoxifen patients, respectively (p < 0.001); median time to disease progression (TTP) in patients achieving CB was 18.0 months and 7.0 months, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.08-0.20, p < 0.01). At data cutoff, 89% of tamoxifen patients had died, compared with 60% of anastrozole patients; median time to death was 17.4 months and 16.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47-0.86, p = 0.003). Therapy was well tolerated in both groups. Anastrozole showed significant advantages over tamoxifen for CB, median TTP in patients gaining CB, and survival. These data further support routine use of anastrozole as first-line treatment for postmenopausal hormone-dependent ABC.     

Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women: results of the Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (Arimidex; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, and Macclesfield, United Kingdom) with that of tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC) in postmenopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy of anastrozole 1 mg once daily relative to tamoxifen 20 mg once daily in patients with tumors that were hormone receptor-positive or of unknown receptor status who were eligible for endocrine therapy. The primary end points were time to progression (TTP), objective response (OR), and tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 668 patients (340 in the anastrozole arm and 328 in the tamoxifen arm) were randomized to treatment and followed-up for a median of 19 months. Median TTP was similar for both treatments (8.2 months in patients who received anastrozole and 8.3 months in patients who received tamoxifen). The tamoxifen:anastrozole hazards ratio was 0.99 (lower one-sided 95% confidence limit, 0.86), demonstrating that anastrozole was at least equivalent to tamoxifen. Anastrozole was also as effective as tamoxifen in terms of OR (32.9% of anastrozole and 32.6% of tamoxifen patients achieved a complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]). Clinical benefit (CR + PR + stabilization of > or = 24 weeks) rates were 56.2% and 55.5% for patients receiving anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated. However, incidences of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding were reported in fewer patients treated with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (4.8% v 7.3% [thromboembolic events] and 1.2% v 2.4% [vaginal bleeding], respectively). CONCLUSION: Anastrozole satisfied the predefined criteria for equivalence to tamoxifen. Together with the lower observed incidence of thromboembolic events and vaginal bleeding, these findings indicate that anastrozole should be considered as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with ABC.     

An open randomised trial of second-line endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. comparison of the aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole

It was previously shown that letrozole (Femara) was significantly more potent than anastrozole (Arimidex) in inhibiting aromatase activity in vitro and in inhibiting total body aromatisation in patients with breast cancer. The objective of this study was to compare letrozole (2.5 mg per day) and anastrozole (1 mg per day) as endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anti-oestrogen. This randomised, multicentre and multinational open-label phase IIIb/IV study enrolled 713 patients. Treatment was for advanced breast cancer that had progressed either during anti-oestrogen therapy or within 12 months of completing that therapy. Patients had tumours that were either positive for oestrogen and/or progesterone receptors (48%) or of unknown receptor status (52%). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints included objective response, duration of response, rate and duration of overall clinical benefit (responses and long-term stable disease), time to treatment failure, and overall survival, as well as general safety. There was no difference between the treatment arms in TTP; median times were the same for both treatments. Letrozole was significantly superior to anastrozole in the overall response rate (ORR) (19.1% versus 12.3%, P=0.013), including in predefined subgroups (receptor status-unknown, and soft-tissue- and viscera-dominant site of disease). There were no significant differences between the treatment arms in the rate of clinical benefit, median duration of response, duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure or overall survival. Both agents were well tolerated and there were no significant differences in safety. These results support previous data documenting the greater aromatase-inhibiting activity of letrozole and indicate that advanced breast cancer is more responsive to letrozole than to anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy.     

Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy in hormone receptor positive advanced breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Two randomized, double-blind trials have compared tamoxifen 20 mg daily and the selective, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole 1 mg daily as first-line therapy for advanced breast carcinoma (ABC) in postmenopausal women. The trials were prospectively designed to allow for combined data analyses. METHODS: The combined study population included 1021 postmenopausal women (median age, 67 years [range, 30-92]) with ABC whose tumors were either estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive or of unknown receptor status. Primary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), objective response, and tolerability. RESULTS: At a median duration of follow-up of 18.2 months, anastrozole was at least equivalent to tamoxifen in terms of median TTP (8.5 and 7.0 months, respectively; estimated hazard ratio [tamoxifen relative to anastrozole], 1.13 [lower 95% confidence level, 1.00]). In a retrospective subgroup analysis, anastrozole was superior to tamoxifen with respect to TTP (median values of 10.7 and 6.4 months for anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively, two-sided P = 0.022) in patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive tumors (60% of combined trial population). In terms of objective response, 29.0% of anastrozole and 27.1% of tamoxifen patients achieved either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CR + PR + stabilization of > or = 24 weeks) rates were 57.1% and 52.0% for anastrozole and tamoxifen, respectively. Both anastrozole and tamoxifen were well tolerated. Anastrozole led to significantly fewer venous thromboembolic (P = 0.043; not adjusted for multiple comparisons) events, and vaginal bleeding was reported in fewer patients treated with anastrozole than with tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with hormonally sensitive ABC, anastrozole should be considered as the new standard first-line treatment.     

Letrozole in the neoadjuvant setting: the P024 trial

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have consistently reported lower response rates in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer when compared with HR- cases. Preoperative endocrine therapy has therefore become a logical alternative and has gained considerable momentum from the finding that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are more effective than tamoxifen for HR+ breast cancer in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The most convincing neoadjuvant trial to demonstrate the superiority of an AI versus tamoxifen was the P024 study, a large multinational double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55% for letrozole and 36% for tamoxifen (P<0.001). Significantly more letrozole-treated patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (45 vs. 35%, respectively; P=0.022). In addition, ORR was significantly higher with letrozole than tamoxifen in the human epidermal growth factor receptor HER1/HER2+ subgroup (P=0.0004). The clinical efficacy of letrozole in HER2+ breast cancer was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and was found to be comparable to that of HER2- cases (ORR 71% in both subsets). Biomarker studies confirmed the superiority of letrozole in centrally assessed estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors and found a strong relationship with the degree of ER positivity for both agents. Interestingly, letrozole was effective even in marginally ER+ tumors and, unlike tamoxifen, consistently reduced the expression from estrogen-regulated genes (progesterone receptor and trefoil factor 1). Furthermore, when analyzed by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, letrozole was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing tumor proliferation (P=0.0009). Thus, neoadjuvant letrozole is safe and superior to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ locally advanced breast cancer.     

Serum epidermal growth factor receptor/HER-2 predicts poor survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, HER-1, and erbB1) is overexpressed in primary breast cancer and had been identified as a poor prognostic factor. METHODS: Pretreatment serum EGFR levels were quantified by using an enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay in a Phase III first-line trial of letrozole and tamoxifen and were correlated with patient outcomes. RESULTS: Serum EGFR levels in a control group of 117 healthy, postmenopausal women measured 64.1 +/- 13.3 ng/mL (mean +/- standard deviation). Using a cutoff EGFR level of 44.1 ng/mL from the control group (5% nonparametric method), 53 of 535 patients (10%) had decreased serum levels of EGFR. Patients with decreased serum EGFR had no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), or time to treatment failure (TTF); however, they did have significantly reduced survival compared with patients who had normal serum EGFR levels (median survival, 23.3 months vs. 30.9 months; P = .007). A combined analysis of pretreatment serum EGFR and HER-2 yielded no additional predictive information for ORR, CBR, TTP, or TTF compared to serum HER-2 alone. However, in the current analysis, a subgroup of patients who had decreased serum EGFR and normal serum HER-2 was identified (n = 39 of 535 patients; 7.3%) that had significantly reduced survival compared with patients who had normal serum levels of both EGFR and HER-2 (median survival, 23.5 months vs. 37.1 months; P = .005). In multivariate analysis, a decreased serum EGFR level remained a significant independent prognostic factor for decreased survival (hazards ratio, 1.58; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had metastatic breast cancer, decreased serum EGFR/normal serum HER-2 predicted shorter survival compared with patients who had normal levels of serum EGFR/HER-2. This patient subgroup deserves further study to assess their response to and selection for anti-EGFR-directed therapies.     

Anti-tumor effects of letrozole

The use of drugs, which inhibit estrogen biosynthesis, is an attractive treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. Estrogen deprivation is most specifically achieved using inhibitors which block the last stage in the biosynthetic sequence, i.e., the conversion of androgens to estrogens by the aromatase enzyme. Recently, a new generation of aromatase inhibitors has been developed. Among these, letrozole (Femara) appears to be the most potent. When given orally in milligram amounts per day to postmenopausal women, the drug almost totally inhibits peripheral aromatase and causes a marked reduction in circulating estrogens to levels that are often undetectable in conventional assays. Similarly, neoadjuvant studies demonstrate that letrozole substantially inhibits aromatase activity in both malignant and nonmalignant breast tissues, and markedly suppresses endogenous estrogens within the breast cancers. These studies also illustrate anti-estrogenic and anti-proliferative effects of letrozole in estrogen receptor (ER)-rich tumors. Thus, tumor expression of progesterone receptors and the cell-cycle marker Ki67 is significantly and consistently reduced with treatment. Additionally, clear pathological responses as evidenced by decreased cellularity and increased fibrosis are seen in the majority of cases. These results translated into clinical benefit in a series of 24 breast cancers treated neoadjuvantly with letrozole (either 2.5 or 10 mg): tumor volume reductions > 25% were observed in 23 women, and > 50% reductions in 18 patients. Pathological and clinical effects are seen much more consistently than with tamoxifen. Thus, in a multicenter randomized trial of letrozole vs. tamoxifen (PE 024), clinical study outcomes were superior for letrozole in comparison with tamoxifen with regard to overall tumor response and an increase in the proportion of patients treated by breast conserving surgery. Letrozole has also been used in advanced breast cancer, both as second-line hormone treatment following tamoxifen failure, and more recently as first-line therapy. Trials of second-line treatment in which letrozole has been compared with either older aromatase inhibitors or progestins have shown equivalent or superior clinical activity and improved tolerability favoring letrozole. In first-line comparison with tamoxifen in metastatic disease, a phase III trial of over 900 postmenopausal women showed letrozole to be significantly better than tamoxifen in terms of overall tumor response rates, clinical benefit, and time to treatment failure. In summary, letrozole is an exceptionally potent and specific endocrine agent. In patients with ER-rich tumors, high rates of pathological and clinical response have been documented, and large phase III trials against established treatments such as tamoxifen and progestin suggest superior (or at least equivalent) clinical efficacy. Letrozole is a drug of immense potential and in the future is likely to occupy a central role in the management of postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer.     

Aromatase inhibitor versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal woman with advanced breast cancer: a literature-based meta-analysis

Clinical trials have reported conflicting results as to whether Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as first-line hormonal therapy improve outcome over tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. We performed a meta-analysis comparing primary and secondary endpoints of AIs to tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The event-based odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were derived, and a test of heterogeneity was applied. Six eligible trials (2560 patients) were selected from 488 studies that initially were identified. A significant difference in favoring AIs over tamoxifen was observed in overall response rate (ORR; OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.07; P = .002) and clinical benefit (CB; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.33; P = .0009).Whereas the trend toward an improved overall survival (OS) rate was not significant (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.88-4.30; P = .10).Toxicities did not differ significantly except vaginal bleeding (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P = .0002) and thromboembolic event (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.77; P = .003). AIs appeared to be effective and feasible compared with tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Further prospective, randomized, controlled trials will be necessary.