Superior mobilisation of haematopoietic progenitor cells with glycosylated G-CSF in male but not female unrelated stem cell donors

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) effectively mobilises haematopoietic stem cells to the peripheral blood. It is unclear whether the mobilisation of stem cells with lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) or filgrastim (non-glycosylated G-CSF) leads to a higher cell number of collected engraft able progenitor cells. Thus, we investigated harvesting efficiency of the licensed G-CSF preparations in mobilising peripheral stem cells in a randomised study. A total of 501 healthy unrelated donors, including 339 males and 162 females received either lenograstim (n = 261) or filgrastim (n = 240) at 10 microg/kg body weight (BW) per day. Aphaeresis was performed on day 5 and, if necessary, on day 6 of mobilisation. The number of CD34+ cells collected was 11.5% higher in the lenograstim group (7.19 x 10(6) vs. 6.44 x 10(6)/kg BW donor; P < 0.03). Univariate variance analysis revealed that this effect was caused by male donors: more progenitors cells per kg BW of the donor (7.73 x 10(6) vs. 6.88 x 10(6); P < 0.017) and of the recipient (10.1 x 10(6) vs. 8.88 x 10(6), P < 0.029) could be harvested. There was no significant difference in the percentage of donors in whom a second aphaeresis was required (9.6% vs. 11.6%). Lenograstim mobilises progenitor cells into the peripheral blood more effectively in males than filgrastim.     

Reduced dose of lenograstim is as efficacious as standard dose of filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: a randomized study in patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

In vitro studies have demonstrated a 27% increased efficacy of lenograstim over filgrastim. However, equal doses of 10 microg/kg/day of filgrastim and lenograstim have been recommended for mobilization of CD34+ cells without associated chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated whether a 25% reduced dose of lenograstim at 7.5 microg/kg/day is equavalent to 10 microg/kg/day filgrastim for autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation. A total of 40 consecutive patients were randomized to either filgrastim (n = 20) or lenograstim (n = 20). The two cohorts were similar in regard to disease, sex, body weight, body surface area, conditioning regimens, previous chemotherapy cycles and radiotherapy. Each growth factor was administered for 4 consecutive days. The first PBSC apheresis was done on the 5th day. In the posttransplant period, the same G-CSF was given at 5 microg/kg/day until leukocyte engraftment. Successful mobilization was achieved in 95% of patients. Successful mobilization with the first apheresis, was achieved in 10/20 (50%) patients in the filgrastim group versus 9/20 (46%) patients in the lenograstim group. No significant difference was seen in the median number of CD34+cells mobilized, as well as the median number of apheresis, median volume of apheresis, percentage of CD34+ cells, and CD34+ cell number. Leukocyte and platelet engraftments, the number of days requiring G-CSF and parenteral antibiotics, the number of transfusions were similar in both groups in the posttransplant period. Lenograstim 7.5 microg/kg/day is as efficious as filgrastim 10 microg/kg/day for autologous PBSC mobilization and transplantation.     

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim: effects on blood cell recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate whether glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (lenograstim) offers a benefit over non-glycosylated G-CSF (filgrastim) in clinically relevant end points after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 261 patients treated with either lenograstim (n=68) or filgrastim (n=193). Time to blood cell recovery, toxicities, and infectious complications were analyzed in a total of 469 G-CSF treatment cycles.Results Mean time to leukocyte recovery was 10.7 days (SD±0.9) (lenograstim) and 10.8 days (SD±0.6) (filgrastim), respectively. Likewise, time to thrombocyte engraftment, febrile days, duration of therapeutic antibiotic treatment, severity of non-hematological toxicities, duration of in-hospital stay, and duration of G-CSF treatment were similar in both groups. Owing to the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of lenograstim, the required dose until leukocyte recovery was significantly smaller as compared to filgrastim (38.5 vs 54.0 µg/kg of body weight).Conclusions Collectively, our data indicate that both G-CSF preparations are equally effective in hastening leukocyte recovery in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous PBSCT.     

Efficacy and safety of two different rG-CSF preparations in the treatment of patients with severe congenital neutropenia

In patients with severe congenital neutropenia (SCN), the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is raised during treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), resulting in a marked reduction of bacterial infection. Some patients, however, still have recurrent but less severe bacterial infections and severe periodontal infections. As it has been suggested that the biological activity of glycosylated recombinant human G-CSF (rHuG-CSF, i.e. lenograstim) is higher than the non-glycosylated form (i.e. filgrastim), we compared the two given in equimolar doses. Seven SCN patients participated in an open, randomized, double crossover study comprising 60 weeks, with four 12-week periods when the two drugs alternated after a 12-week run-in-period. The mean ANC values, sampled every second week, were 5.1 x 10(9)/l during filgrastim treatment and 4.2 x 10(9)/l during lenograstim treatment (P = 0.042). The ANC levels were also significantly higher during filgrastim treatment, when comparing each complementary pair of ANC measurements (P = 0.011) as well as the mean ANC values during each 12-week treatment period (P = 0.033). There were no differences regarding the frequency of infection, antibiotic treatment, gingival bleeding and the number of hospital admissions between the groups. We conclude that filgrastim and lenograstim displayed equal clinical efficacy, but that ANC levels were higher during filgrastim treatment, when administered in equimolar doses.     

Cost benefit and clinical efficacy of low-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after standard chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

High costs of molecule-targeted drugs, such as rituximab, ibritumomab, and tositumomab have given rise to an economical issue for treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), which are also expensive, are widely used for treating neutropenia after chemotherapy. In Japan, lenograstim at 2 microg/kg (about 100 microg/body) or filgrastim at 50 microg/m(2) (about 75 microg/body) is commonly administered for patients with NHL after chemotherapy. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is an important issue in treatment for NHL. Patients with advanced-stage NHL who needed chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or a CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab were enrolled in this randomized cross-over trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose G-CSF. Half of the patients were administered 75 microg filgrastim in the first course after neutropenia and 50 microg lenograstim in the second course, and the other half were crossed over. Forty-seven patients were enrolled in this cross-over trial, and 24 patients completed the trial. Frequencies and durations of grade 4 leukocytopenia and neutropenia were similar in the two groups. Severe infection was rare and was observed at similar frequency. Frequencies of antibiotics use were also similar. The total cost of G-CSF (cost/drug x duration of administration) was significantly lower in patients who received 50 microg lenograstim. Hence, a low dose of lenograstim might be safe, effective and pharmaco-economically beneficial in patients with advanced-stage NHL.     

A randomized controlled phase III trial of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for treatment of severe chronic neutropenia

Patients with idiopathic, cyclic, and congenital neutropenia have recurrent severe bacterial infections. One hundred twenty-three patients with recurrent infections and severe chronic neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) due to these diseases were enrolled in this multicenter phase III trial. They were randomized to either immediately beginning recombinant human granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (filgrastim) (3.45 to 11.50 micrograms/kg/d, subcutaneously) or entering a 4-month observation period followed by filgrastim administration. Blood neutrophil counts, bone marrow (BM) cell histology, and incidence and duration of infection-related events were monitored. Of the 123 patients enrolled, 120 received filgrastim. On therapy, 108 patients had a median absolute neutrophil count of > or = 1.5 x 10(9)/L. Examination of BM aspirates showed increased proportions of maturing neutrophils. Infection-related events were significantly decreased (P < .05) with approximately 50% reduction in the incidence and duration of infection-related events and almost 70% reduction in duration of antibiotic use. Asymptomatic splenic enlargement occurred frequently; adverse events frequently reported were bone pain, headache, and rash, which were generally mild and easily manageable. These data indicate that treatment of patients with severe chronic neutropenia with filgrastim results in a stimulation of BM production and maturation of neutrophils, an increase in circulating neutrophils, and a reduction in infection-related events.     

Results and follow-up of a phase III randomized study of recombinant human-granulocyte stimulating factor as support for immunosuppressive therapy in patients with severe aplastic anaemia

In patients with idiopathic severe aplastic anaemia who are treated with immunosuppressive agents to combat T lymphocyte-mediated destruction of haematopoietic progenitor cells, neutropenia is a major cause of infections and toxicity. Evidence from preliminary studies suggests that recombinant human glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) increases the number and functionality of neutrophils in patients with severe aplastic anaemia. This randomized, parallel-group, multicentre study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous lenograstim during the first 12 weeks of standard immunosuppressive therapy in 102 patients with de novo severe aplastic anaemia. The addition of lenograstim to standard therapy resulted in an increase in the proportion of patients showing complete neutrophil response (83.0%vs 44.9%; P < 0.0001). This was seen even among patients with very severe aplastic anaemia (69.2%vs 31.6%; P = 0.012). In patients receiving lenograstim, median time to complete neutrophil response was shorter (6.3 vs 16.1 weeks; P = 0.0001) and mean duration of first neutrophil response was longer (P = 0.0248) than in the control group. At a median follow-up of 5 years, no difference was observed between the groups in term of survival, haematological response and occurrence of secondary leukaemia (one patient in each group). We conclude that lenograstim support of immunosuppressive therapy might be used for patients with severe aplastic anaemia as it significantly enhances neutrophil recovery but does not modify the overall response and survival.     

Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation followed by G-CSF

Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) have been reported in a few studies including small patient numbers. The present study was performed to assess the incidence, types, outcome and factors affecting early and late infections in 150 patients aged 18 to 68 years (median 46.5) who underwent high-dose therapy, with G-CSF. Patients were kept in reverse isolation rooms and received antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis with oral quinolone and fluconazole. One hundred and fifteen patients (76.7%) developed fever (median 3 days, range 1-29); 20 patients (55.5%) had Gram-positive and 13 (36. 2%) Gram-negative bacterial infections. There were no fungal infections or infection-related deaths. Mucositis grade II-IV (P = 0. 0001; odds ratio 3.4) and >5 days on ANC <100/microl (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 2.3) correlated with development of infection. Only days with ANC <100/microl affected infection outcome (P = 0.0024) whereas the antibiotic regimen did not. After day +30 there were four cases of bacterial pneumonitis (2.7%), one case of fatal CMV pneumonia (0. 8%) and 20 of localized VZV infection (13.3%). Reduction of neutropenia duration with PBPCT and G-CSF is not enough to prevent early infectious complications since only a few days of severe neutropenia and mucositis are related to development of early infections. However, no infection-related deaths were seen. Although Gram-positive organisms were the major cause of bacteremia, a glycopeptide in the empirical antibiotic regimen did not affect infection outcome. In PBPCT recipients, early and late opportunistic infections were notably absent, which was at variance with what was seen with bone marrow recipients. Efforts should be made to prevent mucositis and neutropenia and identify new strategies of antibacterial prophylaxis.     

Pegfilgrastim reduces the length of hospitalization and the time to engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with melphalan 200 and auto-SCT compared with filgrastim

To reduce the duration of neutropenia after conditioning chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT), granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are commonly administered. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of pegfilgrastim compared to filgrastim on neutrophil engraftment, hospital stay, and supportive measures in patients with multiple myeloma after conditioning with Melphalan 200 (Mel200) followed by APBSCT. Ninety-two APBSCT after Mel200 treatment were performed in 72 patients between January 2006 and December 2009 at our institution. Patients received either single-dose pegfilgrastim (n?=?46; 50%), or daily filgrastim (n?=?46; 50%) after APBSCT (median duration of filgrastim use, 9?days; range, 3?C14?days). Duration of neutropenia grade IV was shorter with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (median, 5?days (range, 3?C14?days) versus 6?days (range, 3?C9?days), p?=?0.0079). The length of hospitalization differed significantly (pegfilgrastim (median, 14.5?days; range, 11?C47?days) versus filgrastim (median, 15.5?days; range, 12?C64?days), p?=?0.024). Pegfilgrastim-treated patients had less red blood cell transfusions (median, 0 transfusions (range, 0?C10) versus 0.5 transfusions (range, 0?C9), p?=?0.00065). Pegfilgrastim was associated with reduced cost of the treatment procedure compared with filgrastim (p?=?0.031). Pegfilgrastim appears to be at least equivalent to filgrastim without additional expenditure in myeloma patients treated with Mel200 and APBSCT.     

A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.     

Lenograstim for the treatment of neutropenia in patients receiving ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus infection: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in AIDS patients

This phase IIa, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the dose of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) suitable for use in AIDS patients. The study was conducted at 27 European AIDS/HIV centres, and recruited 69 AIDS patients with an initial episode or relapse of cytomegalovirus infection (neurological site excluded) and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < or = 1.0 x 10(9)/L upon diagnosis or between days 1 and 12 of ganciclovir (GCV) treatment. The patients were randomised to placebo (n = 14) or one of four lenograstim arms: 150 microg/m2/d (the standard onco-haematology dose, n = 13) or 100 (n = 13), 50 (n = 15), or 25 microg/m2/d (n = 14). In all groups, the planned dose of GCV was 10 mg/kg/d for 21 d. Median ANC at weeks 2 and 3 was significantly higher in each lenograstim group than in the placebo group (p = 0.05). At week 3, median ANC (x 10(9)/L) was 0.7 in the placebo group, compared with 6.0, 7.4, 4.5, and 2.0 in the 150, 100, 50, and 25 microg2/d lenograstim groups, respectively. Median ANC was not significantly different between the 150, 100, and 50 microg/m2/d lenograstim groups at any time point, but significantly higher in the 50 than in the 25 microg/m2/d group at weeks 2 (p = 0.05) and 3 (p = 0.02). Lenograstim was generally well tolerated, leading to no severe adverse events. In conclusion, lenograstim 50 microg/m2/d is suitable for the treatment of ganciclovir-induced neutropenia and is safe. These results should help the physician choose an optimal and cost-efficient regimen for patients with AIDS-related neutropenia when rHuG-CSF support is indicated.     

Mobilization of CD34+ cells by glycosylated and nonglycosylated G-CSF in healthy volunteers — a comparative study

Abstract: In vitro studies indicate that lenograstim (glycosylated G–CSF) is more potent than filgrastim (nonglycosylated G–CSF) on a weight for weight basis. However, such a difference has not yet been shown in vivo. The primary objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy of equivalent doses (μg) of lenograstim and filgrastim in mobilizing CD34+ cells. Thirty-two healthy male volunteers, median age 27 yr (19–44 yr), were randomized to receive either lenograstim 10 μg/kg followed by filgrastim 10 μg/kg or vice versa with a washout period of a minimum 4 wk. Both drugs were administered as s.c. injections once daily for 5 d (d 1–5). CD34+ cells were mobilized with a similar kinetics, peaking at median d 6 (5–6) for both drugs. A significant difference in favour of lenograstim was shown for peak number of CD34+ cells/μl blood (104±38 vs. 82±35, mean±l SD, p<0.0001, paired t-test, n=30) and number of CFU-GM/μl blood at d 6 (14.6±8.4 vs. 10.2±4.6, p<0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in the d 6 number of CD3+ cells. Both drugs were generally well tolerated and did not differ with respect to number of adverse events. In conclusion, lenograstim 10 μg/kg/d mobilizes PBPC more efficiently than the identical dose of filgrastim, indicating a difference in in vivo potency between the two G–CSFs.     

A prospective randomized trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy after autologous blood stem cell transplantation in adults.

In order to assess the potential clinical benefit of filgrastim (G-CSF) after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) autotransplantation a randomized study was begun in our center in July 1997: 62 patients were involved (30 received filgrastim after PBSC infusion and 32, the control group, received no cytokines). All were adults (median 40 years, range 18-65). Patients with one of three different pathologies were recruited: 28 had advanced breast carcinoma, 23 had lymphomas (12 Hodgkin's disease and 11 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) and 11 had de novo AML. All of them were transplanted using myeloablative chemotherapy conditioning regimens. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously from day +5 in the treated group at a dose of 5 microg/kg body weight/day. The numbers of CD34+ and mononuclear (MNC) cells infused were similar in each group. Only minor differences regarding the use of G-CSF could be inferred from the analysis of the data. Faster granulocyte engraftment was evident in the treated group (mean of 10 vs 12 days to achieve >0.5 x 109/l granulocytes, P = 0.0008), without differences in incidence and severity of infections, days of fever or duration of antibiotic treatment between groups. There was slightly slower platelet engraftment (mean of 15 days in the group with G-CSF vs 12 days in the other group to achieve >20 x 109/l platelets, P = NS) in this series, but there were no differences in incidence and severity of haemorrhage or platelet transfusion support. Considering the economical costs, the median expenditure per inpatient stay was Eur5961 (range Eur4386-Eur17186) in the G-CSF group compared with Eur5751 (range Eur3676-Eur15640) in the control group (P = 0.47). From our data it could be concluded that for adult patients transplanted with PBSC there is no clear beneficial impact of post-infusion G-CSF administration.     

Economic analysis of a phase III study of G-CSF vs placebo following allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF) decrease the duration of neutropenia following stem cell transplantation (SCT). With CSF-mobilized allogeneic blood SCT (alloBSCT), the yields of CD34+ cells are several-fold higher than in other SCT settings, raising concern that post-transplant CSF use may be unnecessary. In this study, we estimate the resource and cost implications associated with CSF use following alloBSCT. A cost identification analysis was conducted for 44 patients on a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of G-CSF following alloBSCT. Study drug was given daily until an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 1000 cells/microl. Billing information from the time of transplant to day +100 was analyzed. The median number of days to an ANC > or = 500 cells/microl was shorter in the G-CSF arm, 10.5 days vs 15 days (P < 0.001), while platelet recovery and rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival were similar. Resource use was similar, including days hospitalized, days on antibiotics, blood products transfused and outpatient visits. Total median post-transplant costs were $76577 for G-CSF patients and $78799 for placebo patients (P = 0.93). G-CSF following allogeneic blood SCT decreased the median duration of absolute neutropenia and did not incur additional costs, but did not result in shorter hospitalizations, or less frequent antibiotic use.     

Randomized trial of filgrastim versus chemotherapy and filgrastim mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells for rescue in autologous transplantation

Peripheral blood cell (PBC) rescue has become the mainstay for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors. Different methods of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization are in use without an established standard. Forty-seven patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma received salvage chemotherapy and were randomized to have HPC mobilization using filgrastim [granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)] alone for 4 days at 10 microg/kg per day (arm A) or cyclophosphamide (5 g/m(2)) and G-CSF at 10 microg/kg per day until hematologic recovery (arm B). Engraftment and ease of PBC collection were primary outcomes. All patients underwent the same high-dose chemotherapy followed by reinfusion of PBCs. There were no differences in median time to neutrophil engraftment (11 days in both arms; P =.5) or platelet engraftment (14 days in arm A, 13 days in arm B; P =.35). Combined chemotherapy and G-CSF resulted in higher CD34(+) cell collection than G-CSF alone (median, 7.2 vs 2.5 x 10(6) cells/kg; P =.004), but this did not impact engraftment. No differences were found in other PBC harvest outcomes or resource utilization measures. A high degree of tumor contamination, as studied by consensus CDR3 polymerase chain reaction of the mobilized PBCs, was present in both arms (92% in arm A vs 90% in arm B; P = 1). No differences were found in overall survival or progression-free survival at a median follow-up of 21 months. This randomized trial provides clinical evidence that the use of G-CSF alone is adequate for HPC mobilization, even in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed lymphoma.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) versus placebo following allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

Blood stem cell transplantation (BSCT) results in rapid hematopoietic recovery in both the allogeneic and autologous transplant settings. Because of the large numbers of progenitor cells in mobilized blood, the administration of growth factors after transplantation may not provide further acceleration of hematopoietic recovery. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to determine the effects of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF) administration on hematopoietic recovery after allogeneic BSCT. Fifty-four patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing a related, HLA-matched allogeneic BSCT were randomly assigned to receive daily filgrastim at 10 microg/kg or placebo starting on the day of transplantation. A minimum of 3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the allograft was required for transplantation. All patients received a standard preparative regimen and a standard regimen for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 11 days (range, 9-20 days) for patients who received filgrastim compared with 15 days (range, 10-22 days) for patients who received placebo (P =.0082). The median time to achieve a platelet count greater than 20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days (range, 8-35 days) for patients who received filgrastim compared with 15.5 days (range, 8-42 days) for patients who received placebo (P =.79). There were no significant differences for red blood cell transfusion independence, the incidence of acute GVHD, or 100-day mortality between the groups. The administration of filgrastim appears to be a safe and effective supportive-care measure following allogeneic BSCT.     

Biosimilar G-CSF versus filgrastim and lenograstim in healthy unrelated volunteer hematopoietic stem cell donors

The World Marrow Donor Organization recommends original granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the mobilization of stem cells in healthy unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donors. We report the comparison of a biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio) with two original G-CSFs (filgrastim and lenograstim) in mobilization in unrelated donors. We included data of 313 consecutive donors who were mobilized during the period from October 2014 to March 2016 at the Medical University of Warsaw. The primary endpoints of this study were the efficiency of CD34+ cell mobilization to the circulation and results of the first apheresis. The mean daily dose of G-CSF was 9.1 μg/kg for lenograstim, 9.8 μg/kg for biosimilar filgrastim, and 9.3 μg/kg for filgrastim (p < 0.001). The mean CD34+ cell number per microliter in the blood before the first apheresis was 111 for lenograstim, 119 for biosimilar filgrastim, and 124 for filgrastim (p = 0.354); the mean difference was even less significant when comparing CD34+ number per dose of G-CSF per kilogram (p = 0.787). Target doses of CD34+ cells were reached with one apheresis in 87% donors mobilized with lenograstim and in 93% donors mobilized with original and biosimilar filgrastim (p = 0.005). The mobilized apheresis outcomes (mean number of CD34+ cells/kg of donor collected during the first apheresis) was similar with lenograstim, biosimilar filgrastim, and filgrastim: 6.2 × 10⁶, 7.6 × 10⁶, and 7.3 × 10⁶, respectively, p = 0.06. There was no mobilization failure in any of the donors. Biosimilar G-CSF is as effective in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in unrelated donors as original G-CSFs. Small and clinically irrelevant differences seen in the study can be attributed to differences in G-CSF dose and collection-related factors. Active safety surveillance concurrent to clinical use and reporting to donor outcome registry (e.g., EBMT donor outcome registry or WMDA SEAR/SPEAR) might help to evaluate the possible short- and long-term complications of biosimilar G-CSF.     

More efficient mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells with HiDAC+AMSA+G-CSF than with mini-ICE+G-CSF in patients with AML

We have compared the efficacy of two PBSC mobilisation regimens, mini-ICE+filgrastim (second consolidation) and HiDAC+AMSA+filgrastim (third consolidation), in two consecutive cohorts of patients with AML CR1 receiving treatment according to a joint protocol. Group A: 18 patients, aged 41 (21-65) years, were mobilised with mini-ICE (idarubicin 8 mg/m(2)+cytarabine 800 mg/m(2)+etoposide 150 mg/m(2) days 1-3) followed by filgrastim 300-480 microg once daily s.c. from day 11 after start of chemotherapy. Only four patients reached >5 CD34+ cells/microl blood (B-CD34+) and were able to undergo leukaphereses. Two out of 18 (11%) reached the defined target of >/=2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. Group B: 20 patients, aged 50 (29-67) years, received HiDAC+AMSA (cytarabine 3 g/m(2) b.i.d. days 1, 3, 5+amsacrine 150 mg/m(2) q.d. days 2, 4) followed by filgrastim at a similar dose starting on day 7. A total of 18 patients reached B-CD34+ >5/microl and underwent PBSC harvesting, starting on day 23 (14-29) and yielding 4.0 (0.9-21) x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Of 20 patients, 17 (85%) reached the defined target of >/=2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after 1-3 leukaphereses. We conclude that HiDAC+AMSA+G-CSF - in contrast to mini-ICE+G-CSF - is an efficient regimen for mobilising PBSC in patients with AML CR1.     

Actin polymerization in neutrophils from donors of peripheral blood stem cells: divergent effects of glycosylated and nonglycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Neutrophil functions can be modified by Recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) treatment, with divergent effects on phagocytosis, motility, bactericidal activity, and surface molecule expression. Neutrophil morphology is modified by treatment with filgrastim (the nonglycosylated form of rhG-CSF), while it is not affected by lenograstim (the glycosylated type of rhG-CSF). Little information is available about actin polymerization in neutrophils from subjects treated with the two types of rhG-CSF. In the current paper we evaluated two groups of donors of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for allogeneic transplantation. Ten subjects were treated with filgrastim and 10 with lenograstim to mobilize PBSC; 15 blood donors were evaluated as a control group. Actin polymerization (both spontaneous and fMLP-stimulated) was studied by a flow cytometric assay. A microscopic fluorescent assay was also carried out to evaluate F-actin distribution in neutrophils. We found that filgrastim induced an increased F-actin content in resting neutrophils, along with morphologic evidence for increased actin polymerization distributed principally at the cell membrane and frequently polarized in focal areas; in addition, fMLP was not able to induce further actin polymerization. On the contrary, treatment with lenograstim was associated with F-actin content, distribution, and polymerization kinetics indistinguishable from those displayed by control neutrophils. Such experimental results show that filgrastim and lenograstim display divergent effects also on neutrophil actin polymerization and provide further explanation for previous experimental findings.     

Low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard dose in shortening neutrophil engraftment time following myeloablative chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used following myeloablative chemotherapy (high-dose therapy; HDT) and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue (PBPCR) to reduce neutrophil engraftment time. The dose and duration required to gain maximum clinical and economic benefit has not been fully investigated. This double blind placebo-controlled randomised trial was performed to determine whether short course low-dose or standard-dose Lenograstim (L) would influence recovery of haematopoiesis following HDT and PBPCR. Sixty-one patients were randomised between May 1999 and November 2004, to receive standard-dose lenograstim (263 microg/d), low-dose lenograstim (105 microg/d) or placebo injections. These commenced on day +5 following PBPCR and continued until neutrophil engraftment [absolute neutrophil count (ANC)] > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l. Patients received standard supportive care until haemopoietic recovery. Both standard- and low-dose lenograstim resulted in a significantly shorter median time to neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 0.1 x 10(9)/l:10.0 vs. 11.0 d, P = 0.025; ANC > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l:11.0 vs. 14.0 d, P = 0.0002) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in blood product support, antibiotic usage, documented infection, overall survival or relapse-free survival between the groups. Short course low-dose lenograstim is as effective as standard-dose in reducing neutrophil engraftment time following HDT and PBPCR.