A modified gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol failed to increase clinical pregnancy rates in comparison with the long GnRH protocol

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare stimulation characteristics and IVF outcomes of the standard long GnRH agonist protocol for ovarian stimulation with a modified GnRH antagonist protocol. Starting GnRH antagonist in a flexible protocol according to the size of the leading follicle, with simultaneous augmentation of 75 IU recombinant FSH, failed to increase clinical pregnancy rates.     

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval

PurposeFor poor ovarian responders (PORs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was commonly used for prevention of premature LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) over the past two decades. The application of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) recently increased, but the role of PPOS for PORs was uncertain. We aimed to analyze the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and the outcome of oocyte retrieval among PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol for PORs.MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective study, which enrolled the PORs (defined by the Bologna criteria) undergoing COS with PPOS or flexible GnRH antagonist protocol during January 2018 to December 2021. We compared the incidence of premature LH surge (LH > 10 mIU/mL) and the outcome of oocyte retrieval between the PPOS group and the GnRH antagonist group.ResultsA total of 314 women were recruited, with 54 in the PPOS group and 260 in the GnRH antagonist group. The PPOS group had lower incidence of premature LH surges compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol group (5.6% vs 16.9%, P value 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (3.4 vs 3.8, P value 0.066) and oocyte retrieval rates (88.9% vs 88.0%, P value 0.711).ConclusionCompared with PPOS, GnRH antagonist protocol had higher risk of premature LH surges for PORs but may not affect pregnancy rates. PPOS is suitable for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, but should not totally replace GnRH antagonist protocol for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).     

GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor IVF responders: a randomized clinical trial

Objective

To compare the efficacy of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols in IVF poor responders.

Study design

This was a randomized controlled trial performed in the Iakentro IVF centre, Thessaloniki, from January 2007 to December 2011, concerning women characterised as poor responders after having 0–4 oocytes retrieved at a previous IVF cycle. They were assigned at random, using sealed envelopes, to either a long GnRH agonist protocol (group I) or a GnRH antagonist protocol (group II).

Results

Overall 364 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were allocated to the two groups: finally 330 participated in our trial. Of these, 162 were treated with the long GnRH agonist protocol (group I), and 168 with the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol (group II). Numbers of embryos transferred and implantation rates were similar between the two groups (P = NS). The overall cancellation rate was higher in the antagonist group compared to the agonist group, but the difference was not significant (22.15% vs. 15.2%, P = NS). Although clinical pregnancy rates per transfer cycle were not different between the two groups (42.3% vs. 33.1%, P = NS), the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated was significantly higher in the agonist compared to the antagonist group (35.8% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Although long GnRH agonist and fixed GnRH antagonist protocols seem to have comparable pregnancy rates per transfer in poor responders undergoing IVF, the higher cancellation rate observed in the antagonist group suggests the long GnRH agonist protocol as the first choice for ovarian stimulation in these patients.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist 'Cetrorelix' in poor responders comparing with the standard long protocol. DESIGN: The study population consisted of 21 poor responders who underwent ICSI and treated with Cetrorelix according to the multiple-dose protocol and who were compared with 21 poor responders treated according to the long protocol and who also underwent ICSI. Patients in both groups were matched for chronological age, the number of follicles found by ultrasound at the retrieval day and cause of infertility. Fifteen patients of GnRH antagonist group were treated with the combination of GnRH antagonist with clomiphene citrate (CC) plus gonadotropins, while six patients were treated with the combination of GnRH antagonist plus gonadotropins, but without CC. RESULTS: The use of GnRH antagonist in a multiple dose protocol gave a pregnancy rate of 14.28% which was in the range expected for patient with poor response, but with shorter treatment duration and with fewer ampoules of gonadotropins as compared with the use of a GnRH agonist protocol in a depot formulation. Within Cetrorelix group patients who received CC had a significant shorter duration of stimulation and needed fewer ampoules as compared with patients in the same group who did not receive CC. CONCLUSIONS: A GnRH antagonist multiple dose protocol may be the protocol of choice for the treatment of poor responders. The use of GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix ended with significantly less ampoules of gonadotropins and a shorter duration of stimulation.     

Comparing GnRH agonist long protocol and gnrh antagonist protocol in outcome the first cycle of ART

Purpose  

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in comparison with the GnRH agonist protocol in the first cycle of assisted reproductive technique (ART).     

Comparable effectiveness using flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) and single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for IVF cycles--a prospective, randomized study

This prospective randomized study compared the effectiveness of a flexible single-dose gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (cetrorelix) and a single-dose long GnRH agonist (goserelin) protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. All patients from the waiting list were successively included in the study, pre-programmed with an oral contraceptive, and randomized into goserelin and cetrorelix groups. Depending on the date on which their menstrual period started, patients took oral contraceptives for one or two cycles. Ultimately, 236 patients in the first group received a single dose of depot preparation of goserelin and 224 patients received a single 3 mg dose of cetrorelix in the late follicular phase, when the mean follicle diameter exceeded 12 mm. The mean number of ampoules of FSH and the duration of stimulation was statistically significantly lower in the cetrorelix group than in the goserelin group (25.9 versus 34.5, and 9.6 versus 12.2 days, P < 0.01). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was similar (6.7 +/- 4.5 versus 7.2 +/- 4.6, NS). Similar results were observed in fertilization rates, blastulation rates and blastocyst transfer rates in both groups. Clinical pregnancy and delivery rates per cycle were higher in the goserelin group (34.3 and 30.1%) than in the cetrorelix group (31.9 and 28.3%), but the differences were not statistically significant. The flexible single-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is an advantageous alternative to the long GnRH agonist protocol, with similar efficacy, shorter duration, a significant reduction in the number of FSH ampoules used and without the menopause-like effects of the GnRH antagonist.     

IVF/ICSI outcomes of the OCP plus GnRH agonist protocol versus the OCP plus GnRH antagonist fixed protocol in women with PCOS: a randomized trial

Objective

To compare the IVF/ICSI outcomes of the long GnRH agonist and the fixed GnRH antagonist protocol in women with PCOS.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Baskent University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Patients

Three hundred women with PCOS.

Interventions

IVF/ICSI following the long GnRH agonist down-regulation or the fixed GnRH antagonist protocols.

Main outcome measures

Ongoing pregnancy rates.

Results

Ongoing pregnancy rates were 36.4?% in the OCP?+?GnRH agonist group and 35.9?% in the OCP?+?GnRH antagonist group (p?>?0.05). Progesterone levels on the day of hCG (0.76?±?0.71 vs. 0.58?±?0.50), endometrial thickness on the day of hCG (11.57?±?2.50 vs. 10.50?±?2.01), total gonadotropin used (1388.71?±?482.39 vs. 1253.25?±?415.81), and duration of COH (9.07?±?1.96 vs. 8.39?±?1.75) were significantly lower in the OCP?+?GnRH antagonist group.

Conclusion

The OCP?+?long GnRH agonist and the OCP?+?fixed GnRH antagonist protocols yield similar ongoing pregnancy rates in women with PCOS. Although this study consisting three hundred patients, seems to be large enough in a single center, we were not able to reach to the actual size of power analysis which was approximately 3,000.     

No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part II, recombinant FSH

The association between endogenous LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and pregnancy likelihood was examined in a large combined analysis of individualized patient data obtained after treatment with recombinant FSH and a GnRH antagonist prior to IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Data from 1764 patients from six randomized controlled trials were pooled for retrospective analysis. Ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage rates for patients stratified by LH percentiles were assessed. Patients in the lowest LH quartile (< P25) were younger with a higher predicted ovarian reserve and response compared with patients in the highest quartile (> P75). With adjustment for identified predictive factors of pregnancy, estimated odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for ongoing pregnancy for LH categories < P25 versus ≥ P25, > P75 versus ≤ P75 and < P25 versus > P75 were 0.96 (0.75-1.22), 1.13 (0.88-1.45) and 0.89 (0.66-1.21) on stimulation day 8, and 0.96 (0.76-1.21), 1.03 (0.82-1.30) and 0.95 (0.72-1.26) on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin, respectively. No significant differences in pregnancy or miscarriage rates between the LH categories were observed. Endogenous LH concentrations have no association with the likelihood of ongoing pregnancy in women undergoing ovarian stimulation using a recombinant FSH/GnRH antagonist protocol.     

Flexible protocol for administration of human follicle-stimulating hormone with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.

OBJECTIVE: To test, using a primate model, a new approach for achieving individualized pituitary-ovarian responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. DESIGN: Normal ovulatory adult monkeys were selected and randomly assigned to one of the three groups according to onset of spontaneous menses. They had no prior exposure to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or exogenous gonadotropin therapies. SETTING: The laboratories of The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine were used. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Normal adult macaque females were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Monkeys received hormonal therapies of gonadotropins in combination with GnRH antagonist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and ovarian estrogen and progesterone production were monitored. RESULTS: Adding GnRH antagonist to ongoing human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH) stimulation can prevent unwanted LH surges, whether begun at early, mid, or late points in the stimulation protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible protocol for administration of hFSH with GnRH antagonist yielded satisfactory results, with apparent advantages of economy, convenience, and individuality of treatment compared with GnRH agonist plus gonadotropin regimens used currently.     

Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with human pronuclear stage oocytes obtained by the GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, and GnRH agonists

This retrospective study was performed to examine the implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes obtained with the use of a GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix (Cetrotide((R)) ASTA-Medica, Frankfurt/M, Germany) used in a multidose protocol with hMG, and to compare these results with those obtained after a conventional long GnRH analogue protocol (Decapeptyl-Depot, Ferring, Kiel, Germany). The study population consisted of 31 infertile couples with frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes after ICSI treatment using the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix (Cetrorelix((R))) and 31 infertile couples with frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes after ICSI treatment using the long GnRH analogue protocol. Patients underwent ICSI after down regulation with a GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl) and stimulation with hMG, or a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) and hMG. The supernumerary pronuclear stage oocytes were cryopreserved and transferred in a later mildly stimulated cycle. The implantation and pregnancy rates for frozen-thawed pronuclear stage oocytes derived from the GnRH antagonist compared with the GnRH agonist were 3.26% versus 3.73% (P=1.0000) and 8.33% versus 10.25% (P=1.0000), respectively. To our knowledge we report here the first pregnancies obtained by the transfer of cryopreserved pronuclear stage embryos generated from ICSI using a GnRH antagonist in the collecting cycle. The use of Cetrorelix in a multiple dose protocol in combination with hMG does not demonstrate a negative effect on viability, implantation potential or pregnancy outcome as compared to 2PN conceptuses obtained from a long GnRH agonist-hMG protocol.     

Luteal phase oestradiol administration in ovarian stimulation cycles with GnRH antagonist is comparable to the GnRH agonist (long) protocol

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist with luteal phase estradiol administration to GnRH agonist cycles, long protocol. Methods: 55 IVF-ICSI patients received oestradiol in the luteal phase of the cycle, before a cycle with GnRH antagonist. Fifty-five patients submitted to IVF-ICSI with the use of agonist were allocated, age matched, as a control group (historical control). The primary outcome was the number of retrieved oocytes. Results: Patients were similar in terms of clinical characteristics. No differences were found in the number of oocytes retrieved (study group, 8.1 ± 4.7; control group, 7.4 ± 4.5) or in oocyte quality. Conclusions: We clearly demonstrated that the effectiveness of GnRH antagonist when combined with luteal phase estradiol is comparable to GnRH agonist cycles. Capsule Oestradiol associated to GnRH antagonist may increase the rates of oocytes causing reproductive results to be comparable to the results with the use of agonists.     

GnRH拮抗剂方案中HCG扳机时机对胚胎的影响

目的:探讨促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRH antagonist)方案超促排卵过程中推迟人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)扳机时机对胚胎质量及妊娠率等的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至12月在我院接受体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)助孕的不孕症患者183例,均采用GnRH拮抗剂促排方案,于月经周期第2天启用促性腺激素(Gn),当有卵泡平均直径达到14mm,加用GnRH拮抗剂。按照传统HCG扳机时机(有3个≥17mm卵泡)与推迟1天扳机分为2组:早期HCG组(149例)和晚期HCG组(34例),比较两组数据。结果:HCG扳机日,晚期HCG组≥15mm的卵泡数明显多于早期HCG组(P=0.026)。晚期HCG组Gn使用天数及Gn使用总量均明显高于早期HCG组(P=0.000,P=0.012)。妊娠结局方面,晚期HCG组较早期HCG组具有更高的妊娠率(76.00%vs 50.45%,P=0.020)。两组受精率、继续妊娠率、流产率、异位妊娠率均无显著差异(P0.05)。结论:GnRH拮抗剂促排方案中,适当推迟HCG扳机时间不影响胚胎质量和妊娠率,可以推行。     

Precycle administration of GnRH antagonist and microdose HCG decreases clinical pregnancy rates without affecting embryo quality and blastulation

The outcome of a novel protocol utilizing precycle gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration and LH activity support with microdose recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was compared to GnRH agonist long protocol used in patients undergoing their first ICSI (n=707) or IVF (n=571) cycles, which had resulted in one or two blastocyst transfers. In GnRH antagonist cycles, cetrorelix acetate (3 mg) was administered s.c. 4 days before FSH stimulation and a repeat dose was given when the lead follicular diameter was 13-14 mm. LH support was provided by recombinant HCG (2.5 microg). Embryo progression and blastulation were evaluated using embryo progression indices and blastocyst quality scores. The tested protocol demonstrated reduced implantation and clinical pregnancy rates as compared with GnRH agonist long protocol, although the embryo progression and blastulation parameters and blastocyst quality were comparable among the groups. Logistic regression models further supported the significant negative impact of GnRH antagonist/microdose HCG protocol on clinical pregnancy rates in both ICSI and IVF patients. Assisted reproduction cycles with fresh blastocyst transfers utilizing precycle GnRH antagonist administration and microdose HCG support resulted in lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates as compared with GnRH agonist cycles, although the embryo progression and blastulation parameters were comparable.     

In vitro fertilization stimulation protocol for normal responder patients

The aim of this prospective observational study is to determine the different outcomes of IVF/ICSI treatments after using antagonists or agonists of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in normal responder patients. Two hundred forty-seven patients undergoing IVF treatment at the Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Rome (CERMER), from January 2005 to December 2008, were included in the study. Patients were stimulated either with a standard long protocol with GnRH agonists (n = 156) or with GnRH antagonists (n = 91). The use of GnRH antagonists resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of the stimulation (Agonist Group 14.10?±?2.25 vs Antagonist Group 11.34?±?2.11; p < 0.001) and in the amount of gonadotrophin (IU of r-FSH) needed (Agonist Group 1878?±?1109 vs Antagonist Group 1331?±?1049; p = 0.0014). Moreover a lower number of cycles were cancelled with the antagonist protocol (4.39 vs 6.41%). The GnRH antagonist protocol, when compared to the GnRH agonist one, is associated with a similar clinical pregnancy rate, similar implantation rate, significantly lower gonadotrophin requirement and shorter duration of stimulation. For this reason, GnRH antagonists might be a good treatment even for normal responder patients undergoing IVF.     

不同预处理促性腺激素拮抗剂方案在超促排卵中应用的临床分析

目的:探讨如何在体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期中更有效地运用拮抗剂方案。方法:回顾性分析319个使用拮抗剂方案进行IVF-ET无输卵管积液、无内膜息肉及无子宫解剖结构异常的新鲜移植周期。根据拮抗剂治疗前使用短效激动剂(n=125,A组)、口服避孕药(达英-35)(n=113,B组)和未处理组(n=81,C组)分组,比较各组患者的年龄、促性腺激素(Gn)使用天数和剂量、注射hCG日LH和E2水平、获卵数、优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率等。同时以261个促性腺激素激动剂长方案移植周期为对照组(D组)作进一步对比。结果:C组年龄(32.9±4.8岁)较其它组年龄明显偏大,P<0.05;A和B组Gn使用剂量大于C组,其中A组明显增多(P<0.01);A和B组hCG注射日LH水平均较C组明显低,其中A组LH值最低(P<0.01);A组获卵数最多(P<0.05);B组子宫内膜最薄(P<0.01)。3组的受精率、优质胚胎率均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。A组、B组和C组临床妊娠率分别为:32.8%、17.7%和37.0%,B组临床妊娠率显著低于A、C组(P<0.01)。C组、D组间临床妊娠率比较无统计学差异(37.0%vs 40.2%,P>0.05);C组Gn使用的时间和剂量均比D组明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:在IVF-ET中GnRH拮抗剂治疗前使用达必佳预处理未能提高妊娠率,使用过达因-35避孕的患者妊娠率明显下降,而未使用任何药物的患者接受GnRH拮抗剂超促排卵方案,能获得比较好的临床结局。     

GnRH agonist long protocol vs. a single 3-mg gnRH antagonist: a comparison of 2 protocols for pituitary down-regulation in oocyte donor-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles

OBJECTIVE: To compare ovarian stimulation outcomes for 2 protocols of pituitary down-regulation in a group of fertile women. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective outcome analysis of 35 healthy oocyte donors participating in a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization donor program from 1999 to 2004. Consecutive donor cycles were grouped according to the agent used for down-regulation (n = 27 GnRH agonist, n = 31 GnRH antagonist). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, chi2 and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. RESULTS: Neither gonadotropin dosage, days of stimulation or number of oocytes retrieved per treatment cycle were statistically different between groups. The only significant embryo quality parameter was more grade D embryos in the GnRH antagonist (0.4 +/- 0.6) vs. GnRH agonist arm (0.0 +/- 0.2). The number of embryos transferred was significantly greater for the GnRH agonist (2.7 +/- 0.5) than GnRH antagonist arm (1.0 +/- 0.5), whereas implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different between groups. No patient experienced the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. CONCLUSION: Since there was no significant difference in the biologic effects of the 2 protocols, the use of a 3-mg GnRH antagonist for down-regulation in a donor program is preferable to the long protocol because it requires only 1-2 injections for pituitary down-regulation.     

Use of a luteal estradiol patch and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization in poor responders

The administration of a luteal E2 patch/GnRH antagonist protocol before gonadotropins in poor responders may improve ovarian stimulation and result in greater uniformity in follicular development and improved pregnancy rates.     

IVF/ICSI outcomes between cycles with luteal estradiol (E2) pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol and standard long GnRH agonist protocol: a prospective and randomized study

Objective

To study if luteal E₂ pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol improves IVF/ICSI outcomes compared with standard long GnRH agonist protocol.

Design

A prospective, randomized and controlled study.

Setting

ART center of a state public hospital

Patient(s)

Two hundred twenty infertile women underwent IVF/ICSI treatments.

Intervention(s)

Participants received oral Estradiol Valerate 4 mg/day preceding the IVF cycle from day 21 until day 2 of next cycle before GnRH antagonist protocol (E₂ pre-treatment group n?=?109) or received standard long GnRH agonist protocol as control group (n?=?111).

Main outcome measure(s)

Number of oocytes collected, MII oocytes, fertilization, implantation, live birth and early pregnancy rate, and hormone profiles.

Result(s)

E₂ pre-treatment exerted a significant suppressive effect on FSH but not LH secretion compared with basal FSH and LH levels. In E₂ pre-treatment group serum LH level was significantly higher during COH and serum P was also significantly higher on the day of HCG injection compared with control group. Five patients from E₂ pre-treatment group had elevated LH at all time (≥10 IU/L) and also a concomitantly high P (>1 ng/mL). Two of the five women achieved pregnancy but had early pregnancy loss. Overall, IVF/ICSI outcomes such as implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between E₂ pre-treatment and control groups.

Conclusion(s)

Luteal E₂ pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol significantly increases serum LH level and incidence rate of premature LH but no significant effect is observed on implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and early pregnancy loss rates compared with long GnRH agonist protocol. However, more studies in large numbers of cycles are needed to confirm that increased serum LH level by E₂ pre-treatment during COH has no negative effect on the IVF/ICSI outcomes.     

Comparison between the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the first in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycle in an unspecified population of infertile couples

Purpose  

We aimed to compare the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and a GnRH agonist long protocol used in the first in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF–ET) cycle in an unspecified population of infertile couples.     

Low-dose GnRH antagonist protocol is as effective as the long GnRH agonist protocol in unselected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

ObjectiveThe present retrospective and controlled comparative study was designed to evaluate the pregnancy rate achieved using a modified, fixed, multiple-dose 0.125 mg gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol with the long GnRH agonist protocol as the control group.Materials and methodsOne hundred and twenty unselected women between 30 and 40 years of age, in their first cycle of IVF/ICSI, with a baseline follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) <10 IU and an antral follicle count >3 were assigned into two groups: (1) the study group received 0.125 mg of cetrorelix daily starting on Day 6 of stimulation; and (2) the control group received leuprolide daily starting in the mid-luteal phase of the preceding cycle. Both groups were given a flexible dose of recombinant FSH for stimulation. An ongoing pregnancy rate of more than 12 weeks was the primary outcome measure of the study.ResultsPrimary and secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups. A shorter duration of stimulation, a lower dosage of recombinant FSH consumption and a thinner endometrium on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were all observed in the GnRH antagonist group.ConclusionA dosage of 0.125 mg GnRH antagonist protocol was effective for these unselected patients during IVF/ET.