Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Advanced melanoma has a poor prognosis and chemotherapy provides little benefit for most patients. This may be related to heterogeneity of chemosensitivity as well as frequent constitutive resistance to individual cytotoxic drugs. We have therefore examined the heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in metastatic cutaneous melanoma specimens using an ex vivo ATP-based chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). Melanoma deposits (n=55) in skin or lymph node were tested using the ATP-TCA, performed in three separate laboratories. Analysis of the data collected (based on an arbitrary sensitivity index < 300) shows considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity. The most active single cytotoxic agents in the assay were identified as cisplatin, treosulfan, paclitaxel, vinblastine, gemcitabine and mitoxantrone. There was also a limited direct inhibition of melanoma cell growth by interferon-alpha2b, although this agent is known to have a number of indirect biological antitumor effects. Exposure of tumor cells to combinations of drugs at the concentrations tested as single agents showed the most active combinations to be treosulfan+gemcitabine, cisplatin+paclitaxel and vinblastine+paclitaxel. There was considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity: some tumors responded well to one agent or combination, while others showed no response to this and instead responded to one of the alternatives tested. Occasional highly resistant tumors showed no response to any of the single agents or combinations tested. The degree of heterogeneity observed suggests that the ATP-TCA could be used to select patients who might benefit from specific chemotherapeutic agents alone or in combination. This provides the rationale for future randomized controlled trials of ATP-TCA-directed chemotherapy versus physician's choice to determine whether assay-directed chemotherapy can improve patient response and survival.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemonaive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

This phase II study evaluated the activity of gemcitabine (Gemzar) plus cisplatin (Platinol) as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Forty-two chemonaive patients with advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks, up to eight cycles. The median number of cycles completed was 5 (range 2-8). Of the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 20 had a partial response and nine had a complete response, for an overall clinical and pathologic response rate of 70.7% (95% CI 56.8-84.6%). Median overall survival for all 42 patients was 23.4 months (95% CI 15.9-29.9 months) and the median progression-free survival time was 10.4 months (95% CI 9.4-13.5 months). The combination was generally manageable. Hematologic toxicity (grade 3/4 neutropenia: 31.0/21.4%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia: 9.5/4.8%; grade 3/4 anemia: 11.9/0%) and nausea and vomiting (grade 3/4: 35.7/31.0%) were the most common toxicities. There was one toxic death (septic shock due to hematologic toxicity-induced infection). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Further clinical trials with the addition of gemcitabine to first-line treatment appear warranted.     

Phase II trial of vinorelbine tartrate in patients with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma

Metastatic melanoma carries a dismal prognosis and there is a need to develop new treatment strategies. Vinca alkaloids have shown consistent activity in melanoma patients, as monotherapy and as part of combination regimens. The current study evaluates the clinical activity and tolerability of vinorelbine as first-line monotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were eligible if they presented metastatic melanoma not amenable to curative resection, had received no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease and had an adequate performance status (ECOG 0-1). Patients received vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, on an outpatient basis. Thirteen patients were accrued into the study and received 64 cycles. All patients were assessable for response, toxicity and survival. No objective responses were documented, for an overall response rate of 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-19%] and the trial was terminated in accordance to the predetermined early discontinuation rule. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI 2.3-4.3 months) and the estimated median overall survival was 8.1 months (95% CI 6.0-10.2 months). No life-threatening toxicities occurred. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, but none of the three episodes of grade 3-4 neutropenia were complicated by infection. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were asthenia, nausea, neuropathy and myalgia. We conclude that vinorelbine as a single agent on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle has a favorable toxicity profile, but appears to have no relevant clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer

Our objectives were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with stage IV MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. Up to 6 cycles were given. A total of 46 patients with a median age of 49 years (range 24-77) and Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above were enrolled. In total, 238 cycles were administered. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (17%) achieved a complete response and 27 (64%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 81% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-93%]. Median time to progression was 14.9 months (95% CI 0-30.2 months). Median duration of response was 24.2 months (95% CI 11.2-37.3 months). The median survival was 27.9 months (95% CI 23.1-32.7 months), and the 1- and 2-year survival probabilities were 71.4 and 61.4%, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (41.3%), anemia (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (8.7%), alopecia (26.1%) and nausea/vomiting (32.6%). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with MBC. The time to progression of 14.9 months compares favorably with other standard treatments (anthracyclines, taxanes). A randomized study is required to further investigate the role of this combination as first-line treatment for MBC.     

Scheduled administration of low dose irinotecan before gemcitabine in the second line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

We had previously demonstrated that low dose irinotecan (CPT-11) leads to increased accumulation of cells in S-phase and shows a therapeutic synergy with S-phase specific chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. In this phase II study, our objectives were to evaluate the tolerability and activity of low dose CPT-11 followed 24 h later by gemcitabine as second line therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CPT-11 (60 mg/m) was administered 24 h before gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 every 3 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. The median follow-up was 7.4 months. Partial response (PR) was seen in two (6.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.228). PR and stable disease were seen in 22 patients (75.9, 95% CI: 0.564-0.897). The median survival time was 13.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-19.3). The median time to progression was 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-6.2). Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for toxicity. Neutropenia (grade 3 or 4) was observed in 27 patients (71%). Eight patients did not receive cycle 2 of therapy owing to prolonged neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Scheduled administration of low dose CPT-11, 24 h before gemcitabine in the second line therapy of NSCLC yielded comparable disease control rates (PR and stable disease) when compared with other studies using the two chemotherapy drugs in the traditional sequence. However, this approach was associated with higher grade 3/4 neutropenia and is not recommended for further study in metastatic NSCLC.     

Gemcitabine plus sorafenib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium

Background Sorafenib, an inhibitor of B-raf, VEGFR2, and PDGFR-β, has activity against pancreatic cancer in preclinical models. In a phase I trial of gemcitabine plus sorafenib, 57% of pancreatic cancer patients achieved stable disease. Patients and methods We conducted a multi-center phase II trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine in chemo-na?ve patients with histologically-confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Results Seventeen patients enrolled at 4 centers; 13 were evaluable for response. There were no objective responses; 18% had stable disease. Median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI: 3.4, 5.9); median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI: 1.6, 3.6). Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombosis in 18% of patients, dehydration or hand-foot syndrome in 12%, and hypertension or gastrointestinal bleeding in 6%. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus sorafenib is inactive in advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Feasibility of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma and a performance status of 2

The use of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is well documented in selected patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), but little is known on the feasibility of systemic treatments in patients with a performance status (PS) of 2. We retrospectively examined the medical records of consecutive BTC patients with a PS of 2 receiving gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks from January 2003 to December 2011 in our institution. Body composition was analysed by computed tomography scan to detect sarcopenia. The primary evaluation criterion was safety. The secondary evaluation criteria were the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-eight patients (median age: 63 years, range 41-83) received a total of 175 cycles (median per patient: 6, range 2-12). Ten patients (35.7%) had sarcopenia on the pretreatment computed tomography scan. The most frequent toxicities were thrombocytopenia (grades 2-4: n=4, 14.3%), peripheral neuropathy (grades 2-3: n=9, 32.1%) and cholangitis (n=4, 14.3%). The best response was a partial response in 10.7% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-22.2] and stable disease in 42.9% of patients. The median PFS and OS were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.5-6.3) and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.2-9.5) months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients without sarcopenia: 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.4-8.0) vs. 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.0-2.5), P less than 0.01, and 10.4 months (95% CI: 7.5-11.6) vs. 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.7-5.2), P less than 0.01, respectively. In our experience, gemcitabine-oxaliplatin was feasible and induced effective palliation in PS2 patients with advanced BTC. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Paclitaxel and cetuximab combination efficiency after the failure of a platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The addition of cetuximab (CTX) to the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil increases the overall survival (OS) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Only a few patients are eligible for this treatment because of its toxicity. The combination of CTX and paclitaxel (TXL) could be included in sequential treatment strategies. Patients were treated with CTX (400/250 mg/m) and TXL (60-80 mg/m) weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy and safety outcomes were determined retrospectively. A total of 42 patients were included in this analysis. The overall response rate was 38% [95% confidence interval (CI); 23-53%]. The disease control rate with TXL and CTX combination was 74%. Seven (17%) patients progressed before the first evaluation. The median progression-free survival was 3.9 months [95% CI; 3.1-4.7 months] and the median OS was 7.6 months [95% CI; 5.3-9.9 months]. Neurotoxicity and skin rash were the most frequent grade≥2 toxicities, reported in 17 and 12% of patients, respectively. Previous chemotherapy seems to be associated with a lower response rate and progression-free survival but not with the OS. The combination of CTX and TXL was an active and well-tolerated treatment in this series of patients with a poor prognosis and who were mostly symptomatic.     

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing gemcitabine-based doublets versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on overall survival at 6, 12 and 18 months of gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data on the use of gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in randomised controlled phase II-III trials with overall survival as the principal or secondary endpoint. To this end, a literature search was performed using Cochrane methodology. The relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on adjusted number of deaths and patients at risk according to the extent of follow-up and censoring. Twenty-three randomised clinical trials including 5886 patients met the inclusion criteria. In these trials, 2932 patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine-based doublets and 2954 patients to receive gemcitabine alone. RESULTS: Gemcitabine-based doublets were associated with small but significant reductions in the risk of death at 6, 12 and 18 months of 8% (95% CI 3, 13), 4% (95% CI 2, 7) and 3% (95% CI 1, 5), respectively (p<0.005 for all timepoints). No heterogeneity between studies was observed. Subgroup analyses showed an overall survival benefit for gemcitabine-based doublets in clinical trials testing the same planned dose intensity of gemcitabine in comparative arms, using platinum salt-based protocols and with survival as the primary endpoint. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of data obtained from randomised controlled phase II-III trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer showed a small but significant improvement in overall survival for patients receiving gemcitabine-based doublets compared with gemcitabine alone.     

替吉奥联合吉西他滨与单药吉西他滨治疗进展期胰腺癌的疗效比较

目的 评价吉西他滨单药以及与替吉奥联合治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌的有效率、临床受益反应（评价指标包括患者的疼痛强度、止痛药物消耗量、体力状况评分和体重变化）、生存时间和不良反应。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月至2011年10月收治的62例晚期胰腺癌患者,分为吉西他滨单药组（30例）和吉西他滨＋替吉奥联合组（32例）。单药组：吉西他滨1 000 mg·m-2、第1,8天,静脉滴注30 min,每3周重复。联合组：吉西他滨用法同单药组,替吉奥口服2次·d-1,第1~14天,每3周重复。结果 62例患者均可评价客观疗效,可评价临床受益反应者56例（单药组27例,联合组29例）。单药组和联合组有效率分别为23.3％和31.3％（P〈0.05）,临床受益率分别为59.2%和72.4%（P〉0.05）。2组6个月生存率分别为60.0%和68.7%（P〉0.05）,1年生存率分别为26.6%和31.2%（P〉0.05）。中位无疾病进展时间（PFS）分别为3.9个月和5.4个月（P〈0.05）,中位总生存时间分别为7.8个月和9.1个月（P〉0.05）。2组不良反应比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论 吉西他滨联合替吉奥与单药吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌安全有效,前者有效率优于后者。在延长生存期方面也显示出一定的优势,但该差异无统计学意义。     

ET-743: the US experience in sarcomas of soft tissues

Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) has shown promise as a new and effective treatment for soft-tissue sarcomas. Two independent, multicenter, Phase II studies have been performed in the USA for patients with unresectable soft-tissue sarcomas (either chemotherapy-na?ve or pretreated patients). The patients received ET-743 at a dose of 1500 micrograms/m2 as a 24 h continuous intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Assessments were conducted every 6 weeks until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Responses were assessed in accordance with conventional oncological criteria and toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. A total of 72 patients were enrolled: 36 patients to each study. Confirmed objective response rates were 14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 30%) and 8% (95% CI 2 to 23%) in chemotherapy-na?ve and pretreated patients, respectively. In chemotherapy-na?ve patients, 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 18% (95% CI 4 to 32%) and 49% (95% CI 20 to 78%), respectively. For patients with progressive disease despite prior conventional chemotherapy, 12-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 11% (95% CI 2 to 24%) and 55% (95% CI 35 to 75%), respectively. The median duration of response was 11 months. The durability of major responses in a subset of patients was impressive, as was the number of patients who achieved disease stabilization without showing objective response. Overall, ET-743 had a favorable safety profile. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia and transiently increased transaminase concentrations. ET-743 did not cause alopecia, mucositis, cardiotoxicity or neurotoxicity. The side effects were reversible, non-cumulative and manageable. There were no treatment-associated deaths. In conclusion, ET-743 is an active chemotherapeutic agent that can induce objective responses and clinical benefit in a subset of patients with metastatic or advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.     

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the Central Japan Lung Study Group trial 0404

Although S-1 has been shown to have activity against advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its efficacy for elderly patients remains unclear. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients aged 70 years or older with stages IIIB to IV or postoperative NSCLC and performance status 1 or lower were eligible. Patients received S-1 approximately equivalent to 80 mg/m/day for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Twenty-nine patients were eligible. The median age was 78 years (range, 70-85 years). The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.3-43.9%] and 65.5% (95% CI: 48.2-82.8%), respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 4.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-9.8 months). The median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 13.8-25.5 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 53.6%. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The only hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anemia in 6.9% of patients. The grade 3 nonhematological toxicities included hyponatremia, anorexia, nausea, oral mucositis, and diarrhea in 3.4% of patients and infection in 6.9% of patients. S-1 monotherapy was effective and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The results of this study warrant further investigations of this regimen, including a randomized controlled trial.     

Monthly gemcitabine (days 1, 8 and 15) plus cisplatin (days 1-3) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

On the basis of the reported efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this combination has been selected to be given as our firstline service regimen for advanced or metastatic disease. Patients recruitment was almost unlimited: no exclusion criteria were made, except for disease-related Karnofsky's performance status below 50%, the presence of central nervous system or spinal involvement by uncontrolled metastases, or creatinine clearance below 50 ml/min. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks were given on an outpatient schedule to consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Forty-three successive NSCLC patients with histologically or cytologically proven disease were treated. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 35% of cases, squamous cell carcinoma in 60% and broncho-alveolar type in 5%. Smoking was mentioned by 63% of the patients. Numerous medical problems were recorded in 75% of the patients. Stage IIIB was observed in 10 of 43 patients, while metastatic disease was found in the rest. All the patients, except for two, were symptomatic. Two patients achieved complete response (5%) and 16 achieved partial response (37%), yielding an overall objective response rate of 42%. Minimal response was observed in seven patients (16%) and disease stabilization in 7%. Adding the objective response rate to the minimal response and stabilization rates, the disease-control (progression-free) rate reaches 65%. The time to progression ranged from 0 to 69 weeks in all the patients. The overall survival of the group ranged from 4 to 98 weeks, with a median of 45 weeks. Clinical benefit response was observed mainly in patients who also achieved an objective response. We conclude that outpatient cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination is feasible, efficacious and justified in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.     

A phase II open-label trial of apomine (SR-45023A) in patients with refractory melanoma

Summary Metastatic melanoma continues to be a very difficult disease to treat. Options are limited and often have very little impact on the course of the disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuously administered Apomine (SR-45023A), a novel bisphosphonate, in patients with previously treated metastatic malignant melanoma. Adult patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma received Apomine 100 mg orally, twice daily (total dose 200 mg per day) continuously for 28 days (defined as a cycle). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 42 patients received at least one dose of Apomine. Stable disease was achieved in 2 patients (5%). No complete or partial responses were observed. Progression free survival of at least 16 weeks was observed in 6 patients (14%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.9–9.4 months). Time to treatment failure was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.6–1.8 months) with Apomine therapy. By cycle 2, Apomine concentrations reached steady-state. Apomine was well tolerated with only 37% of patients experiencing any drug-related event. Abdominal pain was the most frequent adverse event occurring in 26% of patients. In conclusion, Apomine, at the current dose studied, failed to produce a 30% progression free survival rate at 16 weeks considered to be a meaningful benefit for further development.     

Bevacizumab and erlotinib versus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Improving the survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer requires the use of chemotherapy to be managed with minimum adverse effects. Randomized control trials (RCTs) have shown promising results with a combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib to block two important tumor growth pathways, namely vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor. Aim of the Review We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib with bevacizumab alone in the maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, by examining PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. This study performed a systematic review meta-analysis using existing randomized clinical trial. Methods Randomized controlled trials were systematically reviewed from PubMed, Cochrane library, SCOPUS, CRD, and Google scholar databases. After evaluating the quality of studies through the Cochrane checklist, data of the relevant studies were extracted. This meta-analysis included outcomes of overall survival, progression-free survival of the disease through the hazard ratio, and the upper and lower confidence intervals for the third and fourth degree side effects of relative risk. To perform the meta-analysis for both types of survival, two fixed and random effect models were used. Results A total of three trials, providing data of 682 patients who received maintenance treatment, were included in this meta-analysis. Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib significantly increased the overall survival compared to using bevacizumab alone [HR?=?0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.93]. This combination, effectively increased progression-free survival [HR?=?0.81, 95% CI 0.7–0.93] too. The side effects of diarrhea and grade III rash were more frequent in the group administered bevacizumab plus erlotinib. The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib, in the maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, significantly improved the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients, and the resulting side effects were easily treatable.

     

A randomized phase II study of recombinant human endostatin plus gemcitabine/cisplatin compared with gemcitabine/cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose Studies indicate that recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) can inhibit tumor endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. This study assessed the efficacy of the combination of standard gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy with rh-endostatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy alone or with 7.5 mg/ m² of intravenously rh-endostatin on days 1 to 14 of each 3-week cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Results Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. The best ORRs for rh-endostatin arm (n = 33) and chemotherapy-alone arm were 37.5% (95% CI: 21.3 to 47.2%) and 28.6% (95% CI: 19.8 to 37.6%), respectively. Median survival was 12.4 months in the rh-endostatin arm and 9.8 months in the chemotherapy-alone arm, and 1-year survival was 51.6% and 38.7%, respectively. Mild palpitions, diarrhea, and liver dysfunction were the most common rh-endostatin-related adverse events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were all reported similar for patients in the two arms. Conclusion The addition of rh-endostatin to gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for first-line treatment of NSCLC improves objective response and may improve survival.     

Weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in anthracycline-pre-treated or -resistant metastatic breast cancer patients. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m, folinic acid 10 mg/m and bolus infusion of 5-FU 300 mg/m every week plus G-CSF on day 3 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of disease progression. From May 1998 to May 2000, 51 patients entered the study. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 97.5% (range 81-100%). No severe toxicities were observed. Seven patients (14%) experienced neutropenia grade 2. Seven patients (14%) experienced grade 2 anemia. Two patients (4%) experienced severe asthenia. Three out of 50 evaluable patients [6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-12.6%] showed a complete response, whereas 23 (46%, 95% CI 32.2-59.8%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 38.2-65.8%). In addition, eight patients (15.7%) had stable disease. In the 13 patients untreated for metastatic disease, the overall response rate was 92.3% (CI 77.8-100), with one complete response and 11 partial responses (84.6% CI 65-100%). In the whole group, the median time to progression and overall survival were 8 (range 1-18) and 14 months (95% CI 11-17), respectively. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines, the weekly administration of paclitaxel, 5-FU and folinic acid with G-CSF support seems to be extremely tolerable and active.     

低剂量吉西他滨延时输注联合奈达铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的：评价低剂量吉西他滨延时输注联合奈达铂治疗非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的疗效及耐受性。方法选择60例初诊局部晚期/转移性IIIB或IV期非小细胞肺癌患者,按1∶1随机分成两组,研究组：吉西他滨250 mg·m^-2, civ 6 h,d1、d8;奈达铂80 mg·m^-2,d1;q28d。对照组：吉西他滨1000 mg·m^-2,30 min d1、d8;奈达铂80 mg·m^-2,d1;q28d。观察和比较两组的治疗反应率（ORR）、无进展生存期（PFS）、总生存期（OS）及其毒副作用。结果研究组与对照组的ORR均为33.3%（P〉0.975）。平均随访14个月,两组平均PFS分别为6.5个月和6.3个月（P〉0.05）;平均OS分别为12.45个月和12.49个月（P〉0.05）,差异均无统计学意义。两组血液学毒性反应多为轻中度,白细胞减少发生率分别为33.3%和46.6%,贫血发生率分别为33.3%和43.3%,血小板减少的发生率分别为10%和20%;胃肠道反应轻微;脱发相对较常见,发生率分别为87%和70%。所有毒副作用的差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论低剂量延时输注吉西他滨联合奈达铂治疗局部晚期/转移性NSCLC安全性好,且具有与标准剂量30 min输注方案相当的抗肿瘤效果。     

An open label, non-comparative phase II study of gemcitabine as salvage treatment for patients with pretreated adult type soft tissue sarcoma

Summary Background: The number of effective cytotoxic agents for the treatment of patients with metastatic adult type soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is limited, when patients have failed anthracyline-based chemotherapy. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine in this setting. Methods: Between August 2001 and March 2003 19 patients were eligible to enter. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minutes infusion at a dosage of 1 g/m² on day 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks. All patients had progressive disease during (n = 12) or shortly after an anthracycline-based regimen (n = 3). Results: Four of 19 patients did not start study treatment because of fulminant progression. Fifteen patients with a median age 47 years (32–72) were assessable. All patients had received at least one prior treatment regimen (range, 1–6) for metastatic disease containing anthracyclines (n = 15) and ifosfamide (n = 11). To date, a total of 72+ cycles have been applied (median; 3, 1–28+). Seven patients (47%) had progressive disease after completion of two cycles at the first response assessment. One patient (6%) attained a partial remission, and 7 patients (47%) achieved disease stabilisations. One patient is still on treatment after more than 2.5 years. The calculated progression-free rate at 3 and 6 months was 46.7% (CI_95%, 21.4–71.9) and 13.3% (CI_95%, (0–30.5). 95% of the cycles have been applied without any dose modification or treatment delay. Conclusions: Considering response and progression-free rate as the primary endpoints for phase II trials in pretreated STS, gemcitabine has moderate efficacy.     

吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗复发转移性乳腺癌的临床观察

目的观察吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗复发转移性乳腺癌的临床疗效及不良反应。方法 32例蒽环类及紫杉类药物治疗失败的复发转移性乳腺癌患者接受吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗：吉西他滨1 000 mg·m-2,静脉滴注第1,8天;卡培他滨1 250 mg·m-2,口服,2次/日,第1~14天,每21 d为1周期,每2个周期评价疗效,最终观察目的为PFS及药物毒副反应。结果 32例患者中完全缓解（CR）3例,部分缓解（PR）11例,ORR为43.75%;中位PFS达7.5个月。主要不良反应为血液系统毒性：Ⅲ~IV度粒细胞减少发生率为42.5%;手足综合征发生率38.2%,胃肠道反应28.3%,无化疗相关死亡病例。结论吉西他滨联合卡培他滨治疗复发转移性乳腺癌近期疗效肯定,耐受良好,远期疗效有待进一步观察。