A prospective, randomized, double-masked comparison of a zonal-progressive multifocal intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.

INTRODUCTION: Multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been designed to provide improved near visual acuity without spectacles compared with monofocal IOLs. Early studies have reported variables amounts of decreased visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with multifocal IOLs, and some patients have experienced halos and glare. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective, double-masked, multicenter evaluation of 62 patients randomized between a new zonal-progressive optic multifocal IOL and a monofocal IOL. RESULTS: Mean postoperative spherical equivalent, astigmatism, and uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity were similar between the two groups. Patients with a multifocal IOL achieved significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity than patients with monofocal IOLs (J3+ versus J7; P less than 0.0001). With distance correction only, mean near visual acuity was J2 versus J5- (P = 0.0001). Best-corrected near visual acuity was J1 for both groups, with 1.36 diopters (D) for the multifocal group versus 2.37 D for the monofocal group (P less than 0.0001). Regan contrast sensitivity was lower for the multifocal patients at all contrast levels, and achieved statistical significance at very low contrast (11% contrast; P = 0.0024). Fifty-two percent of patients with a multifocal IOL reported that they did not need spectacles at all or used them only for their fellow eye, compared with 25% of the patients with monofocal IOLs. CONCLUSION: Both monofocal and multifocal implant patients were very satisfied with the results of their cataract extraction and IOL implant surgery. A small loss of contrast sensitivity with the multifocal IOL was demonstrated, consistent with theoretical predictions. The functional significance of the loss of contrast sensitivity appears to be small and counterbalanced by the advantage of improved uncorrected near visual acuity.     

Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes

OBJECTIVE: Two million cataract extractions are performed annually in the United States. The procedure is nearly always accompanied by implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), which corrects the patient's distance vision. The authors' objective was to measure visual function and quality-of-life outcomes associated with bilateral implantation of a multifocal IOL, which corrects distance and near vision, and to compare the outcomes with those of the standard therapy. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial was conducted at eight sites in the United States, seven sites in Germany, and one site in Austria. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 245 cataract patients, 127 of whom received the multifocal IOL bilaterally and 118 of whom received a monofocal IOL of nearly identical construction bilaterally. METHODS: Clinical data included visual acuity (VA), complications, and adverse events. Quality-of-life data were collected using a previously validated survey instrument at baseline, after first eye surgery, and after second eye surgery. RESULTS: At 3 months after surgery, patients who had received multifocal IOLs had significantly better uncorrected and distance corrected binocular near VA compared with patients who had received monofocal IOLs (mean uncorrected VA, 20/26 multifocal vs. 20/40 monofocal; mean distance corrected VA, 20/28 multifocal vs. 20/45 monofocal; P < 0.0001). Additionally, 96% of patients who had received multifocal IOLs and 65% of patients who had received monofocal IOLs achieved both 20/40 and J3 (Jaeger) or better uncorrected, binocular distance and near visual acuities (P < 0. 0001). Patients who had received multifocal IOLs were more likely than patients who had received monofocal IOLs to never wear glasses overall (32% multifocal vs. 8% monofocal; P < 0.0001). On a 4-point scale, patients who had received multifocal IOLs on average reported having between "a little bit" and "some" glare or halo, whereas patients who had received monofocal IOLs reported between "none" and "a little bit" of glare or halo (1.57 vs. 0.43; P < 0.001). Patients who had received multifocal IOLs rated their vision without glasses better overall at near and at intermediate distances (P < or = 0.002) and demonstrated better visual function for near tasks and social activities. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract patients who received multifocal IOLs at time of surgery obtained better uncorrected and distance corrected near VA and reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, less spectacle dependency, and more glare or halo than those who received traditional monofocal IOLs.     

双眼植入多焦和单焦人工晶状体后视力及立体视比较研究

目的 比较双眼植入ReSTOR+3D非球面多焦点人工晶状体(MIOL)与传统球面单焦点人工晶状体(SIOL)后全程视力和立体视觉情况.方法 前瞻性临床研究.对2009年5月至2010年6月在上海公利医院眼科治疗的病人18例(36只眼)植入ReSTOR+3DMIOL(SN6ADI),20例(40只眼)植入传统球面SIOL(SNt0AT).以术后第二眼为标准随访3个月.测两组的远、中、近视力及近立体视锐度,进行相应统计学分析.结果 术后裸眼及最佳远、近矫正视力两组无明显差异(t值分别为1.14、1.74、0.99,P＞0.05),在25cm、30cm、33cm、40cm、50cm、60cm、70cm近中距离上,MIOL组远视力矫正下近视力均优于SIOL组(t值分别为14.02、20.28、24.52、32.74、21.91、11.66、9.76,P＜0.01).MIOL组裸眼近立体视锐度优于SIOL组(P＜0.05).双眼矫正近视力后,两组的立体视觉差异无统计学意义(X2=64.97 P＞0.05).结论 ReSTOR+3D多焦点IOL较单焦点IOL可提供更好的近、中视力和裸眼近立体锐度,实现了很高地脱镜率,良好地全程视力使其拥有广泛的应用价值.

Abstract：

Objective To compare visual acuity from far to near and stereoscopic vision in patients who underwent bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs)with monofocal IOLs. Methods This prospective study comprised patients having implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal ReSTOR SN6AD1 IOL with a C3.0 D add (SN6AD1) or a monofocal IOL (SN60AT). Visual acuity from far to near distances and stereoscopic vision were evaluated 3months postoperatively. Results Multifocal IOL group comprised 36 eyes of 18 patients. Monofocal IOL group comprised 40 eyes of 20 patients. The differences between groups of uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity and corrected near visual acuity had not statistically significant (P＞0.05).The mean distance-corrected visual acuity at 25 cm, 30 cm, 33 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm, 60 cm, 70 cm were better in the multifocal group than in the monofocal group (P＜0.01). The near stereoscopic vision. in the multifocal group were better than in the monofocal group (P＜0.01). When near corrected,there were no significant difference between the stereoscopic vision for the multifocal and monofocal groups (P＞0.05). Conclusions The diffractive multifocal IOL with a low add power provides significantly better intermediate, near visual acuity than the monofocal IOL. When near uncorrected, the multifocal group has better stereoscopic vision. Spectacle independence is higher with the multifocal intraocular lens.     

Far and near visual acuity with multifocal intraocular lenses in an optomechanical eye model with imaging capability

PURPOSE: To compare the quantitative and qualitative visual performances of different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in an experimental model of the human eye. SETTING: University Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. METHODS: Five multifocal IOLs and 1 monofocal IOL were implanted in an optomechanical eye model with imaging capability. The comparative optical characterization of the imaging performance included aberrometry, simulated visual acuity testing at variable contrast for far and near distance, glare tests, and image records of optotype charts. RESULTS: The maximum recorded far visual acuity for the monofocal IOL was between 20/12.5 and 20/16; the multifocal IOLs decreased visual acuity by 1 to 2 lines. The difference tended to increase at reduced contrast. Full-contrast near visual acuity with multifocal IOLs ranged between 20/63 and 20/25; the near distance performance of the monofocal IOL without an additional correcting lens was worse by 1 to 3 lines of acuity with large pupils but was comparable with small pupils. Multifocal IOLs of different designs showed marked differences as a function of contrast, which tended to balance between far and near behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal IOLs of different optical designs were well characterized and distinguished by simulated contrast acuity testing in an experimental eye model, allowing quantitative comparison. Their overall visual performance, averaged over contrast and distance, was not superior to the performance of a monofocal IOL without an additional correcting lens.     

单眼白内障患者植入多焦点人工晶状体与单焦点人工晶状体后的双眼视功能比较

目的比较单眼白内障患者植入多焦点人工晶状体（IOL）或单焦点IOL后的双眼视功能。方法前瞻性非随机对照研究。2013年6月至2014年12月期间,在我院行白内障超声乳化联合IOL植入术的单眼白内障患者80例（80眼）,根据植入的IOL类型分为2组,各40例（40眼）。观察组植入多焦点IOL,对照组植入单焦点IOL。术后随访3个月,观察指标包括术眼单眼及双眼远（5 m）、中（70 cm）、近（40 cm）视力,双眼对比敏感度,近立体视,脱镜率,视觉干扰现象及患者满意度。术后视力及对比敏感度比较采用独立样本t检验;脱镜率及光干扰现象发生率的比较采用χ²检验;近立体视、视力满意度评分比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。结果观察组双眼裸眼远、中、近视力分别为0.03±0.04、0.17±0.07、0.15±0.06,对照组双眼裸眼远、中、近视力分别为0.05±0.05、0.27±0.08、0.31±0.09,观察组双眼裸眼中视力和近视力优于对照组（t=3.925、3.429,P＜0.01）,而2组间双眼裸眼远视力差异无统计学意义（t=0.356,P＞0.05）。双眼在空间频率为3、6、12、18 c/d时,观察组无眩光对比敏感度和有眩光对比敏感度均低于对照组（无眩光：t=3.463、3.361、2.198、2.574,P＜0.05;有眩光：t=3.105、2.432、2.758、3.207,P＜0.05）。观察组近立体视优于对照组（Z=2.578,P＜0.05）,脱镜率（88%）高于对照组（28%）（χ²=8.240,P＜0.05）,2组间视远满意度评分差异无统计学意义（Z=0.598,P＞0.05）,而观察组视中和视近满意度评分均高于对照组（Z=2.314、3.137,P＜0.05）。2组间视觉干扰眩光现象差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.602,P＞0.05）,而观察组光晕现象多于对照组（χ²=8.807,P＜0.05）。结论单眼白内障患者植入多焦点IOL相比单焦点IOL能提供更好的双眼中、近视力,双眼立体视,脱镜率及患者满意度,但对比敏感度有所降低。     

Combination of Toric and multifocal intraocular lens implantation in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism

AIM: To assess the binocular visual function in bilateral cataract patients with unilateral astigmatism after combined implantations of Toric with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and to compare with that of Toric and monofocal IOL implantation. METHODS: All the 30 patients with unilateral astigmatism suffered bilateral cataract were randomly divided into two groups: Toric plus multifocal IOL group and Toric plus monofocal IOL group. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at distance (5.0 m), intermediate distance (0.6 m), and near (0.33 m), contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis were assessed 6mo after surgery. Patients were also surveyed for visual disturbances and spectacle dependence. RESULTS: Binocular uncorrected visual acuity (LogMAR) of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes at distance, intermediate, near were 0.05±0.05, 0.24±0.10, and 0.14±0.06 respectively. The values of Toric plus monofocal IOL eyes were 0.06±0.07, 0.26±0.08, and 0.37±0.10 respectively. These values did not indicate significant differences between two groups with exception of near visual acuity. In the photopic condition (with or without glare), the contrast sensitivity of multifocal IOL eyes was significant lower than the monofocal IOL eyes in 18 cpd. In the mesopic condition, the contrast sensitivity of multifocal group was significant lower than monofocal group in 12 cpd, and in mesopic glare condition, this significant difference was found both in 6 cpd and 12 cpd. The stereopsis of Toric/multifocal IOL eyes decreased slightly (100±80 seconds of arc, t=2.222, P=0.136). Mean near vision for patient satisfaction was statistically significantly higher in Toric/multifocal IOL group patients versus than that in Toric/monofocal IOL group (80% vs 25.5%, P=0.000). Visual disturbance was not noticed in either group. CONCLUSION: Although the combination of Toric and multifocal IOL implantation results in compromising stereoacuity, it can still provide patients with high levels of spectacle freedom and good overall binocular visual acuity.     

Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To assess the visual effects of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared with the current standard treatment of monofocal IOL implantation. DESIGN: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: The study was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. Computer database and manual searches were made to identify all randomized trials comparing multifocal IOL implantation with a monofocal control group. Data were extracted using a standardized form and analyzed using Review Manager software. When study reporting allowed meaningful comparison, meta-analysis was performed. The chi-square test was used to examine heterogeneity between studies. Odds ratios were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean differences for continuous variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: There is no single outcome measure that can be thought of as summarizing the efficacy of an IOL. A number of different outcomes had to be examined. The primary outcomes for this review were distance and near visual acuity (unaided and corrected) and spectacle dependence. The secondary outcomes for this review included depth of field, contrast sensitivity, glare, subjective assessment of quality of life or visual function, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Eight trials were identified. There was significant variability among the trials in the outcomes reported. Distance acuity was similar in multifocal and monofocal IOLs. Unaided near vision tended to improve with the multifocal IOL. This resulted in decreased spectacle dependence with use of the multifocal IOL. Adverse effects included reduced contrast sensitivity and the subjective experience of halos around lights. CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal IOLs are effective at improving near vision relative to monofocal IOLs. Whether that improvement outweighs the adverse effects of multifocal IOLs will vary between patients, with motivation to achieve spectacle independence likely to be the deciding factor.     

Quality of vision after AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of Array SA40N multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (AMO) implantation in cataract surgery. SETTING: Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. METHODS: In this prospective randomized comparative trial, 80 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were selected based on preoperative counseling and randomized to have multifocal or monofocal IOL implantation. Fifty-three eyes of 35 patients received a multifocal IOL and 67 eyes of 40 patients, a monofocal IOL. The incidence of complications and visual outcome in the multifocal and monofocal IOL groups were compared. Quality of vision was measured by comparing the severity of visual symptoms (glare, halos, and cataract symptoms score), changes in functional impairment measured by a 7-item visual function test (VF-7), changes in global measures of vision (trouble and satisfaction with vision), and range of accommodation and contrast sensitivity. RESULTS: Intraoperative and postoperative complications and adverse events were few and required no further surgical intervention. Both distance and near visual acuities were significantly better in the multifocal group than in the monofocal group; the difference was most prominent in distance corrected near acuity (P<.001). Thirty-five eyes (67.3%) in the multifocal group and 10 eyes (14.9%) in the monofocal group achieved a distance corrected near acuity of J6 (20/40) or better; 30 eyes (56.6%) and 19 eyes (28.4%), respectively, achieved a best corrected distance acuity of 20/20 or better. Glare symptoms decreased postoperatively in both groups but were slightly more common in the multifocal group. In contrast, halos were significantly more common at 1 month in the multifocal group (P<.001). Contrast sensitivity values were slightly lower with multifocal IOLs at almost all spatial frequencies, but the difference was not significant. The change in the quality of life postoperatively, measured with the VF-7, was significant and identical in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic eyes with multifocal IOLs had better distance and near acuity and range of accommodation than eyes with a monofocal IOL. Slightly lower contrast sensitivity and increased perception of halos by subjects with the multifocal IOL appear to be an acceptable compromise to enhanced near and distance vision.     

ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcome and subjective visual symptoms in patients who had implantation of the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories) with those in patients who received the AcrySof SA60AT monofocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories) in cataract surgery. SETTING: Southend Hospital, Essex, United Kingdom. METHODS: Eighty eyes of 40 patients received the ReSTOR multifocal IOL after cataract extraction. They were closely paired in age, sex, and ocular findings with patients who had monofocal IOL implantation during the same period. The distance and near visual acuities were compared, and patient satisfaction with their vision, visual symptoms, and spectacle dependence was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuities between the groups. An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/30 or better was achieved in 93.8% eyes in the multifocal group and 82.5% in the monofocal group and of 20/20 or better in 57.5% and 40.0%, respectively (P = .18). Uncorrected near visual acuity was 20/30 or better in 75.0% of eyes in the multifocal group and 3.8% in the monofocal group. Reading glasses were required by 2.5% in the multifocal group and by 92.5% in the monofocal group. Satisfactory uncorrected intermediate distance vision was achieved in 75.0% of eyes in the multifocal group and 87.5% in the monofocal group (P = .089); 85.0% of patients in the multifocal group and 7.5% in the monofocal group never had to wear glasses. Moderate glare was reported by 21.3% in the multifocal group and 7.5% in the monofocal group (P = .008); no patient reported severe glare. In the multifocal group, severe halos and moderate halos occurred in 3.8% [corrected] of eyes and 16.3% [corrected] of eyes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL provided predictably good uncorrected distance and uncorrected near acuities. Spectacle independence was significantly higher with this multifocal IOL, which outweighed the photic symptoms it caused.     

Comparative study of 2 types of bifocal implants by measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity]

Evaluation of multifocal IOLs suggests the possibility of two retinal images, one for near and one for distant vision. But the optic principles of multifocal IOLs created overlying images and incident light division. We performed this study to evaluate visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for two types of bifocal IOLs (3M bifocal and IOLAB bifocal IOL) and for a control group of monofocal IOL testing in different levels of luminance simulating the normal environmental conditions of the patient's experience. The results showed a visual functional loss especially at the low luminance level for the 3M bifocal group and at bright luminance for the IOLAB bifocal group, which was previously unknown with and consequences for the indications and exclusions of this kind of IOL.     

多焦点与单焦点非球面人工晶状体植入后视觉质量的临床观察

目的 评价多焦点非球面阶梯渐进衍射型人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后患者的视觉质量.方法 前瞻性非随机对照研究.2008年1月到2009年1月于首都医科大学附属北京同仁眼科中心诊断为双眼白内障的患者50例(100只眼)分别植入单焦点非球面AcrySof IQ(SN60WF)或多焦点非球面AcrySof IQ ReSTOR(SN6AD3)IOL.记录两组患者手术前后裸眼远、近及中间距离视力,矫正远、近距离视力.术后6个月,检测患者明视和暗视、有或无眩光状态的对比敏感度并在正常瞳孔下检测波阵面相差.视功能和生存质量调查问卷评价患者主观的视觉功能.术前、术后及组间计量资料采用配对样本t检验.计数资料采用x2检验.结果 术后两组裸眼远视力(t=1.018,P=0.265),最佳矫正近视力(t=0.679,P=0.501),等效球镜度数(t=0.233,P=0.876)差异无统计学意义,最佳矫正远视力单焦点组较好(t=2.388,P=0.021).裸眼近视力多焦点组明显优于单焦点组(t=11.311,P=0.000),未矫正中间距离视力多焦点组则低于单焦点组(t=2.414,P=0.020).术后,多焦点组较单焦点组的总像差(F=5.169,P=0.041),总低阶像差(F=4.973,P=0.036),总高阶像差高(F=4.640,P=0.048),两组间离焦(F=0.862,P=0.358)散光(F=3.893,P=0.052),彗差(F=2.724,P=0.105),球差(F=1.743,P=0.055),三叶草差(F=3.014,P=0.109)差异无统计学意义.两组术后最佳镜片矫正的远距离对比敏感度在暗视无眩光6 c/d频段差异有统计学意义(t=2.16,P=0.041).在暗视有眩光3 c/d(t=2.329,P=0.029)和6 c/d(t=2.087,P=0.048)频段差异有统计学意义.两组术后视远时脱镜率均大于96%.看近时多焦点组16%(4/25),单焦点组60%(15/25)戴镜.日常总戴镜频率单焦与多焦点组分别为64%(16/25)和24%(6/25).主要视觉干扰中复视、夜间视物困难和眩光多焦点组比例较高,近距视物模糊单焦点组较多.结论 与单焦点IOL比较,多焦点IOL可提供更宽的焦距范围,因此患者裸眼近视力较好,阅读脱镜率较高,具有较好的视觉功能,但对比敏感度有所下降.     

Binocular function after bilateral implantation of monofocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To evaluate binocular function after bilateral implantation of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Contrast sensitivity, glare, depth discrimination, and distance and near visual acuity were examined in 21 patients with a multifocal IOL and 15 patients with a monofocal IOL. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in binocular distance visual acuity between the 2 groups. In near visual acuity with distance correction, the multifocal group had a significant advantage in monocular and binocular vision (P < .05). High contrast with Regan contrast letter acuity charts did not differ significantly between the groups. However, at a contrast of 11%, sensitivity was significantly lower monocularly in the multifocal group. Contrast sensitivity in this group was not significantly lower binocularly. The brightness acuity tester revealed no between-group difference in glare. With the Titmus stereotest, depth discrimination was significantly better with the multifocal IOL with distance correction. CONCLUSION: Bilateral implantation of a refractive multifocal IOL provided good binocular function and alleviated the well-known disadvantage of reduced contrast sensitivity at low contrast levels.     

衍射型多焦点人工晶状体眼对比敏感度和高阶像差研究

目的 对比研究衍射型多焦点和单焦点人工晶状体眼的对比敏感度和高阶像差.方法 所有患者按照植入的人工晶状体类型分成多焦组和单焦组.多焦组植入衍射型多焦点人工晶状体AcrySofReSTOR(Alton),72例(109只眼);单焦组植入单焦点人工晶状体AcrySofSA60AT(Alcon),88例(130只眼).术后随访6～24月,观察远近视力,脱镜率,对比敏感度,高阶像差.结果 单焦组在明光、暗光、暗光眩光条件下各空间频率对比敏感度均高于多焦组,明光条件下3epd和6cpd(中频)空间频率差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),暗光眩光条件下中高频率(除1.5cpd外)差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).术后3阶慧差,4阶球差,总高阶像差均方根(RMS)多焦组略高于单焦组,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).两组间远视力无显著性差异,近视力多焦组101只眼(91.8%)≥J3,单焦组12只眼(9.2%).两组完全脱镜率分别为98只眼(89.1%)和9只眼(6.9%).结论 衍射型多焦点人工晶状体在某些空间频率对比敏感度低于单焦组,没有明显增加高阶像差和视觉干扰;患者具有良好的远近视力和较高的脱镜率.     

多焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量和阅读能力的研究

目的:研究多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后白内障患者的视觉质量及阅读能力。方法:前瞻性临床研究。选择2018年6月至2019年10月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院眼科就诊并行双眼白内障手术的患者共75例(150眼),依据患者选择的IOL进行分组,双眼植入Tecnis ZCB00 IOL 25例(50眼)作为单焦组,双眼植入Tecnis ZMB00 IOL 25例(50眼)作为双焦组,双眼植入AT Lisa tri.839MP IOL 25例(50眼)作为三焦组,对比3组患者术后3个月时的祼眼远视力(UDVA)、祼眼中视力(UIVA)、祼眼近视力(UNVA) (LogMAR)及阅读能力。使用NEI-RQL-42量表中文版评价3组患者术后视觉质量的差异。数据采用卡方检验、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。 结果:共75例(150眼)患者纳入研究。3组间UDVA差异无统计学意义( H=3.187, P=0.203)。三焦组UIVA(0.2±0.1)优于双焦组(0.3±0.2) ( Z=-2.041, P=0.041)和单焦组(0.3±0.3) ( Z=-2.142, P=0.032)。三焦组UNVA(0.3±0.2)和双焦组UNVA(0.3±0.2)优于单焦组(0.4±0.2) ( t=2.332, P=0.017;t=3.014, P=0.036)。3组阅读视力( F=0.421, P=0.658)、阅读速度( F=1.754, P=0.182)、阅读错误率( H=6.347, P=0.052)差异均无统计学意义。三焦组近视力维度得分(92±14)和双焦组近视力维度得分(100±11)均高于单焦组(50±42) ( U=-3.139, P=0.005;U=-3.726, P=0.001);三焦组中视力维度得分(100±12)高于双焦组(75±25)和单焦组(25±75) ( U=-2.758, P=0.017;U=-3.145, P=0.002)。三焦组脱镜率维度得分(100±25)和双焦组脱镜率维度得分(100±40)高于单焦组(30±100) ( U=-3.004, P=0.008;U=-3.766, P=0.001)。 结论:多焦点IOL植入患者可获得与单焦点IOL植入患者配戴老花镜时相同的近距离视觉质量;AT Lisa tri.839MP IOL与Tecnis ZMB00 IOL可提供相同的远近视力及近距离阅读能力,但前者中距离视觉质量更佳。     

衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后临床效果

目的:探讨衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的临床效果。方法:所有患者按照植入的人工晶状体类型分成多焦组和单焦组。多焦组植入衍射型多焦点人工晶状体AcrySof ReSTOR(Alcon),72例(109眼);单焦组植入单焦点人工晶状体AcrySof SA60AT(Alcon)作为对照,88例(130眼)。术后随访6~24mo,观察瞳孔直径,远近视力,最佳矫正视力,脱镜率,术后屈光状态、夜间视觉干扰现象等指标。结果:两组间在远视力和最佳矫正远近视力方面没有显著性差异,而近视力多焦组达到或超过J3的患者101眼(92.7%),单焦组12眼(9.2%),差异具有显著性(χ2=166.44,P=0.00)。两组完全脱镜率分别为98眼(89.9%)和9眼(6.9%)。多焦组完全脱镜的患者术后平均等效球镜为-0.03±0.45D(-1.0~+0.50D),6例7眼(6.4%)视近远时都需戴镜矫正,术后平均等效球镜+1.14D。结论:衍射型多焦点人工晶状体植入后能够使患者获得理想的远近视力,大大降低了患者对眼镜的依赖性。人工晶状体的屈光力测量精确性是增加术后脱镜率的重要因素,应该尽量避免术后等效球镜大于+0.50D。     

Visual function with bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual function of three types of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one monofocal IOL (as the control group) after cataract surgery. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients participated in a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study and received monofocal Tecnis Z9000 (AMO) (n = 24, 48 eyes); symmetric diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZM900 (AMO) (n = 26, 52 eyes); zonal refractive multifocal ReZoom (AMO) (n = 32, 64 eyes); and asymmetric diffractive multifocal TwinSet (Acri.Tec) (n = 32, 64 eyes) IOLs. RESULTS: Mean binocular distance best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (logMAR) was 0.05 for controls, 0.08 for ZM900, 0.07 for ReZoom, and 0.11 for TwinSet, with mean binocular distance BSCVA at near of 0.49, 0.06, 0.22, and 0.11, respectively. Mean contrast sensitivity was better for the monofocal IOL group than for the multifocal IOLs. Patients assigned to TwinSet had less favorable contrast sensitivity scores. Patients with monofocal IOLs had more frequently recommended near addition (74%) than those with multifocal IOLs. Patients with refractive ReZoom had also recommended near addition more frequently than the two diffractive groups. The percentage of dysphotopsia phenomena was 81% in patients with diffractive multifocal ZM900 compared with 48% in patients with monofocal IOLs, 53% with refractive ReZoom, and 47% with diffractive TwinSet. CONCLUSIONS: The monofocal IOL showed better visual function and lesser photic phenomena than multifocal IOLs but patients were spectacle dependent. ReZoom provided better distance BSCVA than the TwinSet diffractive model. Patients with Tecnis and TwinSet diffractive multifocal IOLs were more spectacle independent than patients with ReZoom. Patients with TwinSet had the worst visual function. Patients implanted with the Tecnis diffractive ZM900 were those reporting more photic phenomena.     

多焦点人工晶状体与非球面人工晶状体植入术后视觉质量的临床研究

目的客观与主观检测结合评价非球面设计的多焦点与单焦点人工晶状体植入术后的视觉质量。方法132例（207只眼）白内障患者分别植入非球面的多焦点人工晶状体AcrySof IQ ReSTOR IOL和单焦点人工晶状体AcrySof IQ IOL。记录患者手术后的裸眼远、近视力,矫正远、近视力。术后3个月检测患者明视、暗视和暗视眩光状态的对比敏感度。采用VF-14（Visual function-14）视功能和生存质量调查问卷评价患者主观的视觉质量。结果术后两组裸眼远视力（t=0．61,P〉0．05）最佳矫正近视力（t=1．877,P〉0．05）差异无统计学意义。非矫正近视力多焦点组优于单焦点组（t=11．38,P〈0．001）,单焦点组在明光、暗光、暗光眩光条件下各空间频率对比敏感度均高于多焦点组,明光条件下3cpd和6cpd空间频率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,暗光眩光条件下中高频率差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）,两组无患者存在严重的视觉干扰现象。两组术后视远时脱镜率均大于98％,视近时脱镜率多焦点组为78．9％,单焦点组为10．9％。结论与单焦点人工晶状体相比,除了对比敏感度下降,多焦点人工晶状体能提供令人满意的术后视功能和生活质量,患者能获得较高的视觉质量。     

Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Multicenter clinical trial in Germany and Austria

PURPOSE: To compare bilateral implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal lens with respect to visual function, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. SETTING: Seven clinical sites in Germany and 1 site in Austria. METHODS: A prospective randomized masked clinical trial included 124 randomly assigned bilateral pseudophakic individuals, 64 of whom had bilateral implantation of an Array(R) foldable multifocal IOL (model SA-40N, Allergan) and 60 of whom had bilateral implantation of an AMO(R)PhacoFlex II(R) silicone monofocal IOL (model SI-40NB). Clinical data included binocular uncorrected and corrected distance and near visual acuities, complications, adverse events, and reports of halos and glare. Quality-of-life data were collected on 3 occasions using the modified Cataract TyPE Specification instrument. The functional status of the 2 groups was compared from baseline to final postoperative interview. RESULTS: Three months after surgery, a higher proportion in the Array group achieved a Jaeger value of J3 (20/40 Snellen) or better uncorrected binocular near visual acuity and 0.5 (20/40) or better distance-corrected binocular near visual acuity than in the monofocal groups (97% versus 68% and 95% versus 59%, respectively; P <.001). A higher proportion in the multifocal group achieved both 0.5 (20/40) and J3 or better uncorrected binocular distance and near visual acuities (97% versus 66%; P <.001). Those in the Array group were more likely than those in the monofocal group to never wear glasses overall (41% versus 12%; P <.001). Multifocal patients rated their vision without glasses better overall, at near and at intermediate distances (P <.05), and demonstrated better visual function for near tasks and social activities. CONCLUSIONS: Those who had bilateral implantation of the Array multifocal IOL obtained better uncorrected and distance-corrected near visual acuities and reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, and less spectacle dependency than patients with bilateral monofocal IOLs.     

单焦点、多焦点与可调节人工晶状体植入术后患者的拟调节力观察

目的 研究超声乳化白内障摘除植入不同人工晶状体（IOL）术后患者的拟调节力。方法 前瞻性队列研究。行白内障超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入术且随访资料完整的患者73例（82眼）,依据植入IOL的不同分为3组：单焦点IOL组28例（32眼）,多焦点IOL组24例 （27眼）,可调节IOL组21例（23眼）。术后3 d、1周、1个月、3个月分别测量3组患者的裸眼远、中、近视力,最佳矫正远、近视力,及拟调节力。数据采用单因素方差分析。结果 3组的最佳矫正远、近视力及裸眼远视力差异无统计学意义,而裸眼中视力可调节IOL优于单焦点与多焦点IOL（F=4.50,P＜0.05）,裸眼近视力多焦点、可调节IOL好于单焦点IOL（F=26.06,P＜0.05）。多焦IOL可以提供（2.67±0.49）D的主观拟调节力,（0.93±0.42）D的客观拟调节力;可调节IOL可以提供（3.00±0.78）D主观拟调节力,（0.91±0.58）D客观拟调节力;优于单焦点IOL的（1.78±0.26）D的主观拟调节力（F=18.51,P＜0.05）,和（0.37±0.22）D的客观拟调节力（F=7.39,P＜0.05）。结论 多焦点IOL与可调节性IOL均可提供较好的全程视力及拟调节力。     

双通道技术评价两种衍射型多焦点人工晶状体视网膜成像质量

目的:研究两种非球面衍射型多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)视网膜成像质量。方法:回顾性队列研究。选取2017-10/2019-10诊断为单纯性白内障,行超声乳化吸除联合IOL植入155例155眼为研究对象,植入非球面衍射双焦点IOL 54例54眼、非球面衍射三焦点IOL 54例54眼、单焦点IOL 47例47眼做对照组。随访术后6mo,双通道视觉质量分析系统测量散射指数(OSI)、调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut off)、斯特列尔比值(SR)、100%、20%、9%模拟对比度视力(OV);记录术后裸眼远距离(5m)、中距离(80cm)、近距离(40cm)视力及矫正远视力、矫正远视力基础上的中距离视力和近距离视力;利用VF-14量表进行评分。结果:双焦组和三焦组MTF cut off均低于单焦组(P=0.007、0.043),双焦和三焦组无差异(P=0.445)。三组OSI值无差异(F=1.143,P=0.322),三组SR值无差异(F=3.045,P=0.051)。双焦组和三焦组模拟对比度视力无差异(OV 100%:P=0.974;OV 20%:P=0.713;OV 9%:P=0.947),而双焦和三焦组均低于单焦点组(OV 100%:双焦vs单焦P=0.001;三焦vs单焦P=0.012;OV 20%:双焦vs单焦P=0.002;三焦vs单焦P=0.043;OV 9%:双焦vs单焦P=0.011;三焦vs单焦P=0.029)。三组术后裸眼远视力及矫正远视力均无差异(P=0.054、0.180)。双焦组与单焦组裸眼中视力有差异(P=0.010),三焦组与单焦组、双焦组均有差异(P<0.01)。双焦组和三焦组裸眼近视力无差异(P=0.428),双焦组和三焦组与单焦组均有差异(P<0.01)。三组患者远视力矫正基础上中视力有差异(H=67.176,P<0.01),双焦组与单焦组有差异(P<0.01),三焦组与单焦组和双焦组均有差异(P<0.01)。三组远视力矫正基础上近视力均有差异(H=91.292,P<0.01),双焦组和三焦组无差异(P=0.519),双焦组和三焦组与单焦组均有差异(P<0.01)。三组VF-14表评分有差异(H=71.342,P<0.01),双焦组和三焦组评分无差异(P=0.055),双焦组和三焦组与单焦组均有差异(P<0.01)。结论:双通道视觉系统评估三焦点、双焦点衍射型人工晶状体视网膜成像质量无差别;三焦点较双焦点人工晶状体,可提供更佳的中距离视力。