Acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation in children under cyclosporin A treatment

Thirty-two pediatric renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporin and 34 receiving azathioprine treatment (historical controls) were investigated for the occurrence of rejection episodes; their clinical symptoms and findings, time of onset, influence of donorship, relation to cyclosporin blood levels and graft function outcome were also studied. In the cyclosporin group, four grafts were lost in the 2nd year, while in the azathioprine group five grafts were lost within the first 5 weeks after transplantation due to acute irreversible rejection. Clinical signs of rejection episodes under cyclosporin were mild and usually presented a silent increase of serum creatinine. First rejection episodes occurred later in patients treated with cyclosporin than in azathioprine-treated patients (50% probability after 7 weeks as opposed to 2 weeks). The percentage of patients receiving cyclosporin who had experienced no rejection episodes was 18,8% as opposed to 11,8% of patients receiving azathioprine. The lowest incidence of rejection episodes was observed in patients with living related grafts receiving cyclosporin treatment, 75% of whom were free of rejection episodes after 2 years. Cyclosporin blood levels below 400 ng/ml were observed in 74% of rejection episodes. Biopsies were often used to differentiate between cyclosporin nephrotoxicity and rejection when the cyclosporin levels were above 400 ng/ml. Both treatment groups exhibited a parallel decline in graft function, which correlated with the number of rejection episodes.     

Perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in renal transplant: is there an increase in bleeding complication?

Eng M, Brock G, Li X, Chen Y, Ravindra KV, Buell JF, Marvin MR. Perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in renal transplant: is there an increase in bleeding complication?
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 292–296. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Renal transplant recipients may have comorbidities requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. While the effects of warfarin may be neutralized with plasma infusion, those of aspirin and clopidogrel are not easily reversible and may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. We conducted this study to evaluate the risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving perioperative anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent renal transplantation from July 1, 2005 to April 30, 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving perioperative anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy were identified. The incidence of reoperation, transfusion utilization and decrease in serum hemoglobin from pre‐operative value (ΔHgb) were compared to those on no therapy. Results: Of the 327 patients identified, 105 received pre‐operative anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, 28 received therapy post‐operatively, while 213 patients received no therapy. The incidence of reoperation, transfusion utilization and ΔHgb were not significantly increased with pre‐operative anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. With post‐operative heparin infusion, the incidence of reoperation and transfusion utilization were significantly increased (p values < 0.001). Patients with activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) >80 s experienced significant bleeding complications. Conclusion: A supratherapeutic aPTT with post‐operative heparin infusion was associated with the greatest risk of bleeding complication.     

Steroid Sparing with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplantation

Evidence suggests that steroid sparing in renal transplantation is associated with good outcomes, although there are limited data regarding steroid sparing in Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)-based regimes. In this study we describe the use of these agents in 101 consecutive patients undergoing renal transplantation using only a 7-day course of prednisolone. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 18-44). Patient and graft survival at 1 year were 100% and 98%, respectively. The acute rejection rate at both 6 and 12 months was 19%, with two episodes beyond 12 months. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (anti-CD25 mAb) was administered to 25 patients at high immunological risk: a trend toward a lower rejection rate was seen in these patients compared with those at lower risk but not receiving induction therapy (8% vs. 22%; p = 0.11). Two patients experienced recurrent rejection. Of the twenty-three rejection episodes in total, 26% showed vascular involvement. Allograft function was preserved at 12 months with a mean creatinine of 144 micromol/L and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 55 mL/min. At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 3.5%. This steroid-sparing regime is associated with excellent patient and graft outcomes, and a low incidence of side effects.     

Effect of acute rejection episode on occurrence of chronic rejection after kidney transplantation

Chronic rejection is the most prevalent cause of renal transplant failure in the late post-transplant period. The clinical significance of acute rejection episodes on occurrence of chronic rejection is controversial. We analyzed 503 cases of the first renal transplantation maintained by calcinurine inhibitor for the correlation of acute rejection and clinical chronic rejection. The later the first episode of acute rejection occurred, the shorter was the half-life of graft. The acute rejection occurring within 3 post-transplant months worsens long-term graft survival if the peak creatinine level exceeds 2 mg/dl. Multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model for factors affecting cadaver graft loss by chronic rejection, revealed that the risk factor of acute early rejection was lower than those of donor age and post-transplant hypertension.     

The transmission of donor-derived malignant melanoma to a renal allograft recipient

The transmission to organ transplant recipients of donor origin malignancy in the allograft has been described. Here we report the transmission of malignant melanoma in a renal allograft transplanted from a multiorgan donor. The lung transplant recipient presented with an allograft lesion that was proven to be melanoma and of donor-origin based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR typing. One renal allograft recipient was undergoing his second deceased donor renal transplant, having lost his first graft from recurrent IgA nephropathy. He was unsensitized and immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisolone. He achieved stable graft function and there were no episodes of rejection. Four and a half months post-transplant a diagnosis of donor origin melanoma in the lung recipient was made and his immunosuppression was stopped. He presented with clinical rejection two wk later and a transplant nephrectomy was undertaken. Histology demonstrated vascular and cellular rejection and there was a 3-mm melanoma deposit with no evidence of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes. Three years post-transplant he remained clinically well with no evidence of melanoma and received his third deceased donor renal transplant. This was complicated by cellular rejection in the first week treated with methylprednisolone and vascular rejection at day 10 treated with anti-thymocyte globulin. Three months post-transplant he has achieved good allograft function and remains well with no evidence clinically or on imaging of metastatic melanoma. The other renal allograft recipient was receiving his first deceased donor transplant, having end-stage renal failure of uncertain aetiology. His immunosuppression was not stopped until melanoma was proven in the renal allograft pair six months post-transplant and he then presented with clinical rejection six wk later. Transplant nephrectomy was undertaken and histology did not demonstrate melanoma, but severe vascular and cellular rejection was evident. At three-yr post-transplant he remains disease free clinically and on imaging. At present, the cardiac allograft recipient has no evidence of transmitted melanoma. The highest risk of transmission of donor origin melanoma appears to be from donors who are older and have died from an intracerebral haemorrhage. It is likely these donors have metastatic melanoma and their intracerebral haemorrhage is not primary but has occurred in an unrecognized metastatic cerebral deposit. While the occurrence of donor-transmitted malignancy is not common, the outcome is often fatal.     

Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial of Steroid Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Basiliximab, Cyclosporine Microemulsion and Mycophenolate Mofetil

Corticosteroids withdrawal from immunosuppressive regimens has thus far been associated with increased risk of acute rejection episodes. In this study, basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early corticosteroid withdrawal in de novo renal allograft recipients. Primary renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine-microemulsion, and mycophenolate mofetil, were randomized to either corticosteroid withdrawal at day four post-transplantation (n = 40) or standard steroid therapy (n = 43). The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. Randomized subjects who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of basiliximab were analyzed in an intent-to-treat fashion. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was not significantly different between the steroid withdrawal group (20%) and the standard treatment group (16%). Patient and graft survival was 100% in the steroid withdrawal group while one death in a patient with a functioning graft occurred in the standard steroid group. Seventy-two percent of the steroid withdrawal group remained off steroids at 6 months post-transplant. Allograft function and incidence of adverse events and infections were similar between the two groups. Rapid and early corticosteroid withdrawal among renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction and daily therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection.     

A randomized multicenter trial of cyclosporin and prednisolone versus cyclosporin,azathioprine, and prednisolone following primary living donor renal transplantation

A total of 195 consecutive recipients of primary living donor renal transplants were randomized to receive either cyclosporin (CyA) and prednisolone (double therapy) or CyA, prednisolone, and azathioprine (triple therapy). There was no significant difference in patient or graft survival, incidence of acute rejection episodes, or major complications between the groups. The graft survival at 5 years was 71.5% in patients receiving double therapy and 71.6% in patients receiving triple therapy. In a Cox regression analysis, recipient age and occurrence of acute rejection were the only independently significant variables affecting graft survival, whereas treatment schedule did not. Renal function was stable throughout the observation period and did not differ between the double and triple therapy groups. A linear regression analysis showed that recipient age, donor age, gender, and occurrence of acute rejection significantly influenced the serum creatinine level. This and previous similar prospective studies in cadaveric renal transplantation indicate that there is no advantage of routinely adding azathioprine to a double drug regimen.     

Anticoagulation with enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in postoperative vascular surgery patients

BACKGROUND: The use of postoperative anticoagulation is not uncommon for patients undergoing vascular procedures, whether for adjunctive therapy to the surgical procedure or for resumption of preoperative anticoagulation. We investigated whether low-molecular-weight heparin, specifically enoxaparin, was an effective replacement for intravenous heparin during the postoperative period until achievement of a therapeutic international normalized ratio, together with the impact on postoperative length of stay. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 330 patients who received either traditional intravenous unfractionated heparin with adjusted-dose warfarin daily (n = 169) or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin, specifically enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hours, with adjusted-dose warfarin daily (n = 161). Safety was defined as incidence of bleeding, hematoma, stroke, expiration, thrombocytopenia, return to surgery for graft thrombosis or hematoma, and readmission within 30 days for hematoma or thrombosis. RESULTS: For all procedures, regardless of type of anticoagulation treatment, there was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, except for the increased incidence of return to surgery for graft thrombosis (P =.02), failing graft (P =.0004), and debridement (P =.01) in patients who received unfractionated heparin. For all procedures combined, the average postoperative length of stay was shortened by 2 days with use of low-molecular-weight heparin (P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, use of enoxaparin appears to be safe and effective for vascular postoperative anticoagulation. At the same time, its use can significantly reduce the average postoperative length of stay for patients undergoing vascular procedures. Further prospective data are needed before this protocol can be accepted as an alternative for postoperative anticoagulation in this set of patients.     

Clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients

IntroductionRejection is the most important problem for renal graft function and survival. Complement system plays a key role in immune responses from host to graft. It was demonstrated that complement system activation is related with renal fibrosis. We evaluate clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients.MethodDemographics of the patients, graft functions, acute rejection episodes and graft loss were recorded from data files of 165 pediatric renal transplant patients. Findings of 98 renal biopsies were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsThirty three patients with kidney transplant had 44 acute rejection episodes (32 pure cellular acute rejection episodes / 1 pure humoral acute rejection episode / 11 combined acute cellular and acute humoral rejection episodes) proven by biopsy. C1q staining was positive in 7 biopsies, C3 staining in 15 biopsies and, C4d staining in 15 biopsies. 26 patients had graft fibrosis. All patients with a rejection history had a significant decrease in GFR value during follow-up. Patients who did not have fibrotic changes in first biopsy had same level of deterioration of GFR when compared with patients who had fibrotic changes in first biopsy.ConclusionWe could not demonstrate a significant relation between complement deposition and renal fibrosis, and between complement deposition and GFR values. Our data demonstrated that graft outcomes and graft loss after acute rejection episodes cannot be predicted only with complement deposition on graft or only with graft fibrosis.     

Renal allograft rupture caused by acute tubular necrosis

Renal allograft rupture is a rare but potentially lethal complication of kidney transplantation. A renal allograft recipient receiving quadruple immunosuppressive therapy developed a spontaneous allograft rupture 13 days after kidney transplantation. Warm ischaemia time during the transplant was 80 minutes. The ruptured kidney graft could not be salvaged because of the patient's haemodynamic instability. The histopathological examination showed interstitial oedema with severe acute tubular necrosis with no signs of acute rejection. The most common causes of renal graft rupture are acute rejection and vein thrombosis, while acute tubular necrosis may only rarely be responsible for this complication. Renal graft rupture may be the result of interstitial damage attributed both to the prolonged warm ischaemia time during the transplant and to post-transplant acute tubular necrosis in the absence of graft rejection. In those patients whose haemodynamic status cannot be stabilized by appropriate aggressive haemodynamic support therapy, graft nephrectomy should be considered the only definitive treatment.     

Short- and long-term outcomes of kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined whether the use of kidney allografts with multiple renal arteries adversely effects post-transplant graft and patient outcome or increases the incidence of vascular and urologic complications. BACKGROUND: Kidney grafts with multiple renal arteries have been associated with an increased incidence of early vascular and urologic complications. Kidney transplants with single versus multiple renal arteries have not been compared in regard to long-term graft and patient outcome or post-transplant incidence of hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and late vascular and urologic complications. METHODS: We analyzed 998 adult kidney transplants done from December 1, 1985 through June 30, 1993, in which only the recipient's external or internal iliac artery was used for anastomosis. We divided the study population into 3 groups: Group A-1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 835), Group B-->1 renal artery, 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 112), Group C-->1 renal artery, > 1 arterial anastomosis (n = 51). We compared the incidence of post-transplant hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection, and vascular and urologic complications; mean creatinine levels at 1, 3, and 5 years post-transplant; and patient and graft survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify risk factors for vascular complications. RESULTS: We found no significant differences among the three groups for the following variables: post-transplant hypertension, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection, creatinine levels, early vascular and urologic complications, and graft and patient survival. In kidneys with single arteries, the presence (vs. absence) of an aortic patch and the type of the arterial anastomosis (end-to-end to the hypogastric vs. end-to-side to the external iliac artery) did not have an impact on the incidence of early or late vascular complications. In kidneys with multiple arteries, only the rate of late renal artery stenosis was higher, the rate of early vascular and urologic complications was not different. Our multivariate analysis identified acute tubular necrosis as a risk factor for renal artery and vein thrombosis; graft placement on the left side for arterial thrombosis; and preservation time > or = 24 hours and multiple renal arteries for renal artery stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Results of kidney transplants using allografts with multiple versus single arteries are similar.     

Clinical Significance of MHC-Reactive Alloantibodies that Develop after Kidney or Kidney–pancreas Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between acute rejection, anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and/or class II-reactive alloantibody production, and chronic rejection of renal allografts following kidney or simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Sera from 277 recipients were obtained pretransplant and between 1 month and 9.5 years post-transplant (mean 2.6years). The presence of anti-MHC class I and class II alloantibodies was determined by flow cytometry using beads coated with purified MHC molecules. Eighteen percent of recipients had MHC-reactive alloantibodies detected only after transplantation by this method. The majority of these patients produced alloantibodies directed at MHC class II only (68%). The incidence of anti-MHC class II, but not anti-MHC class I, alloantibodies detected post-transplant increased as the number of previous acute rejection episodes increased (p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that detection of MHC class II-reactive, but not MHC class I-reactive, alloantibodies post-transplant was a significant risk factor for chronic allograft rejection, independent of acute allograft rejection. We conclude that post-transplant detectable MHC class II-reactive alloantibodies and previous acute rejection episodes are independent risk factors for chronic allograft rejection. Implementing new therapeutic strategies to curtail post-transplant alloantibody production, and avoidance of acute rejection episodes, may improve long-term graft survival by reducing the incidence of chronic allograft rejection.     

The value of needle renal allograft biopsy. I. A retrospective study of biopsies performed during putative rejection episodes.

Following renal transplantation, immunosuppression is usually increased to treat presumed rejection episodes. However, a) many conditions mimic rejection in the post-transplant period, and b) many rejection episodes are irreversible. As increased immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased risk of infection, it would be ideal to limit antirejection therapy to only the rejection episodes that are reversible. The role of percutaneous allograft biopsy was studied as an aid to decide which patients to treat for rejection, to limit unnecessary immunosuppression and to predict allograft survival. One hundred thirty-five patients with suspected rejection underwent 206 allograft biopsies without complication. Two hundred four biopsies were available for study. Biopsies were coded on a 1-4 scale (minimal, mild, moderate, severe) for acute and chronic tubulointerstitial infiltrate and vascular rejection, as well as no rejection (e.g., recurrence of original disease). Treatment decisions were made on the basis of the biopsy combined with clinical data. All patients have been followed two years and outcome correlated with biopsy findings (death, nephrectomy, and return to dialysis defined as kidney loss). The results were the following: 1) biopsies represented changes within the kidney. Of 16 kidneys removed within one month of biopsy, no nephrectomy specimen showed less rejection than that seen on biopsy. 2) Eighty-one biopsies (39.7%) led to tapering or not increasing immunosuppression (either no rejection, minimal rejection, or irreversible changes). 3) Kidneys having either severe acute or chronic vascular rejection (less than 30% function at three months) had significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased survival three to 24 months postbiopsy than those with minimal or mild vascular rejection or tubulointerstitial infiltrate (83% function at three months). 4) Kidneys with moderate chronic vascular rejection and those with severe acute tubulointerstitial infiltrate had significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased survival at six to 24 months. 5) Kidneys with moderate chronic vascular rejection (MCV) without an acute infiltrate (ATI) had significantly better survival than those having both MCV and ATI. 6) Similarly, kidneys having severe ATI alone had better survival than those with ATI plus vascular rejection. It was concluded that a) percutaneous allograft biopsy can be done without graft loss or infection; b) biopsy represents changes throughout the kidney; c) biopsy aids in deciding when to treat for rejection and in deciding when to withhold increased immunosuppression, and d) allograft biopsy predicts the outcome of treatment of a rejection episode.     

Effect of pretransplant stored donor-specific blood transfusions on early renal allograft survival in one-haplotype living related transplants

The effect of pretransplant stored donor-specific blood transfusions (DSBTs) on early renal allograft survival in 37 consecutive one-haplotype living related donor (LRD) transplants (group B) was compared with a similar consecutive series of 38 one-haplotype LRD recipients (group A) who did not receive DSBTs. All transplant recipients in both groups were treated with identical immunosuppressive protocols using azathioprine and prednisone. Forty patients received pretransplant DSBTs and three of these patients (8%) developed cytotoxic antibodies to their prospective donors. Neither hyperacute rejection nor hepatitis occurred in group B patients following DSBTs. One group B patient experienced a technical graft loss on the 1st postoperative day and was excluded from the rejection data. Graft survival at 3 and 6 months was 100 and 90% in group B recipients and 68% in group A recipients. All 12 group A graft failures resulted from acute nonreversible rejection episodes occurring during the first 3 months post-transplant. The three group B graft failures occurring at 6 months were attributable to chronic vascular rejection. Chronic rejection of the renal allograft was histologically documented in six group A and five group B patients by 6 months post-transplant. The use of stored donor blood offered a simple and easily monitored method of administering pretransplant DSBTs that was convenient to the donor and recipient. The administration of DSBTs did not appear to be harmful to the recipient. In fact, the use of pretransplant stored DSBTs in one-haplotype LRD renal transplantation appeared to improve the prospects of early graft survival in our experience.     

Treatment of acute rejection episodes in dog renal allograft recipients receiving cyclosporin A:ATG vs prednisolone

Prednisolone and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) were compared for their abilities to reverse acute rejection in cyclosporin A-treated canine graft recipients. Outbred dogs bearing kidney allografts were treated with a suboptimal dose of cyclosporin A (10 mg kg-1); at the onset of an acute rejection episode, animals received daily prednisolone (40 mg kg-1) or ATG (20 mg kg-1) until serum creatinine levels decreased. In seven untreated allograft recipients, rejection was first diagnosed at a mean 4.4 days post-transplant. In 23 dogs receiving cyclosporin A, rejection was first diagnosed in all dogs at a mean 43.6 days post-transplant. Compared to ATG, prednisolone was more successful in the reversal of primary acute rejection episodes (5/8 and 7/8 reversals, respectively) and produced a quicker return to normal renal function (mean 15.4 and 6.8 days, respectively). ATG therapy, however, resulted in fewer subsequent acute rejection episodes than prednisolone therapy (mean 1/5 and 6/7 developed secondary rejection episodes, respectively); the possible advantage of 'clonal depletion' following ATG therapy is discussed.     

Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury

BACKGROUND: Blunt carotid injuries (BCIs) are uncommon. Most single-center studies are small and highlight the use of anticoagulation for treatment. In a retrospective review, we identified 22 patients who presented with BCI and assessed neurologic and survival outcomes on the basis of injury grade and treatment with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Patient demographics were identified using the trauma registry at a single Level I trauma center. Chart reviews assessed neurologic function, modalities used for diagnosis, and treatment. Neurologic outcomes were graded good (minimal to no deficit), fair (moderate deficit needing some assistance), poor (requiring institutionalization), and dead. RESULTS: Twenty-two adult trauma patients were diagnosed with BCI, for an incidence of 0.45% in the 8-year study period. All BCI patients underwent head computed tomography and four-vessel cerebral arteriography. Eight patients were not anticoagulated, five because of intracranial injuries, two who had surgical CCA repairs, and one with an aortic injury. Full anticoagulation with heparin was attempted in seven patients, with four major bleeding complications requiring cessation of heparin and blood transfusions. Seven patients received antiplatelet therapy. No difference in neurologic outcome was observed between those receiving anticoagulation and those receiving antiplatelet therapy. Bleeding complications from full anticoagulation were higher than with antiplatelet agents (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous reports, we did not observe improved outcomes with full anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet therapy. Anticoagulation was associated with increased extracranial bleeding complications. The risks and possible benefits, as well as timing, of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy for BCI should be carefully weighed by the major care providers of the patient with multiple injuries.     

Selective treatment of early acute rejection after liver transplantation: Effects on liver,infection rate,and outcome

To evaluate the results of selective treatment of biopsy-proven mild acute rejection episodes, we retrospectively studied 1-week liver biopsies of 103 patients with a primary liver graft in relation to liver function tests. The overall incidence of rejection was 35 %. In four patients the biopsy showed histological features consistent with rejection; in 27 patients it showed mild acute rejection (grade 1), and in 5 patients it showed moderate acute rejection (grade 2). Study group 1 consisted of 19 untreated patients with grade 1 rejection and group 2 of 8 treated patients with grade 1 rejection. At 30 and 90 days, no differences in liver function tests were found. The infection rate, histology after 1 year, and survival in the two groups did not differ. It may, therefore, be concluded that withholding treatment in histologically proven mild acute rejection is possible in selected patients based on histological, biochemical, and clinical criteria. This may reflect the functional diversity of morphologically similar lymphocytic infiltrates observed in graft biopsies showing features of mild acute rejection.Liver Transplant Group     

Selective treatment of early acute rejection after liver transplantation: effects on liver, infection rate, and outcome

Abstract To evaluate the results of selective treatment of biopsy-proven mild acute rejection episodes, we retrospectively studied 1-week liver biopsies of 103 patients with a primary liver graft in relation to liver function tests. The overall incidence of rejection was 35 %. In four patients the biopsy showed histological features consistent with rejection; in 27 patients it showed mild acute rejection (grade 1), and in 5 patients it showed moderate acute rejection (grade 2). Study group 1 consisted of 19 untreated patients with grade 1 rejection and group 2 of 8 treated patients with grade 1 rejection. At 30 and 90 days, no differences in liver function tests were found. The infection rate, histology after 1 year, and survival in the two groups did not differ. It may, therefore, be concluded that withholding treatment in histologically proven mild acute rejection is possible in selected patients based on histological, biochemical, and clinical criteria. This may reflect the functional diversity of morphologically similar lymphocytic infiltrates observed in graft biopsies showing features of mild acute rejection.     

Laparoscopic renal-adrenal surgery in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy

PURPOSE: Patients requiring chronic anticoagulation are theoretically at increased risk for hemorrhage or thromboembolism perioperatively. Experience with laparoscopic renal/adrenal surgery in patients on chronic warfarin is limited. We assessed hemorrhagic/thromboembolic complications in this group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 787 patients undergoing laparoscopic renal/adrenal surgery were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 25 patients on chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin were identified. The indications for warfarin therapy as well as perioperative management were reviewed. Clinical parameters, including operative time, estimated blood loss, hemorrhagic/thromboembolic complications and transfusions, were documented and compared with those in patients not receiving chronic anticoagulation. RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation (56% of cases) and a prosthetic mitral valve (28%) were the most frequent indications for chronic anticoagulation. Bridging anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin was the most frequent management method (68% of cases). Patients with anticoagulation were older (p <0.001) and hospitalized longer (<0.001) than those without anticoagulation. Operative time, estimated blood loss and the conversion rate were not significantly different between the groups. However patients on chronic warfarin significantly more often required transfusion (24% vs 5.2%, p <0.005) and had more postoperative bleeding episodes (8% vs 0.9%, p <0.05) than patients not on chronic anticoagulation. No thromboembolic events occurred in the anticoagulated group, while 3 occurred in the nonanticoagulated group (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic renal/adrenal surgery in patients requiring chronic anticoagulation therapy can be performed safely. The risk of intraoperative bleeding is not increased, although the incidence of postoperative bleeding as well as transfusions is higher.     

Early postoperative serum cystatin C predicts severe acute kidney injury following pediatric cardiac surgery

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are thought to be involved in the development of renal allograft rejection. To explore this further, we determine whether AECAs play a role both in predicting the incidence of allograft rejection and long-term outcomes by analysis of serum samples from 226 renal allograft recipients for AECAs pre- and post-transplant. Surprisingly, the presence of pre-existing AECAs was not associated with either an increased risk of rejection or a detrimental impact on recipient/graft survival. Subsequent de novo AECAs, however, were associated with a significantly increased risk of early acute rejection. Moreover, these rejections tended to be more severe with a significantly increased incidence of both steroid-resistant and multiple episodes of acute rejection. The acute rejections associated with de novo AECAs did not correlate with C4d deposition at the time of renal biopsy, but did demonstrate an association with the presence of glomerulitis and peritubular capillary inflammation. Significantly more patients with de novo AECAs developed graft dysfunction. Thus, our prospective study suggests the emergence of de novo AECAs is associated with transplant rejection that may lead to allograft dysfunction.