Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic pain or discomfort after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and open mesh repair of groin hernia, and to assess the impact of such pain on patients' physical activity. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to patients who had TEP or open mesh repair of groin hernia between January 1998 and December 1999. The patients were asked about any persistent pain or discomfort in relation to the groin hernia repair and whether this pain or discomfort restricted their ability to undertake physical or sporting activity. RESULTS: Of the 560 available patients 454 (81.1 per cent) replied. Laparoscopic TEP repair was performed in 240 patients (52.9 per cent) and open mesh repair in 214 (47.1 per cent). Of the 454 patients, 136 (30.0 per cent) reported chronic groin pain or discomfort, which was significantly more common after open repair than after laparoscopic repair (38.3 versus 22.5 per cent; P < 0.01). Chronic groin pain or discomfort restricted daily physical or sporting activity in 18.1 per cent of the patients. The patients who had open repair complained of significantly more restriction of daily physical activity than patients who underwent laparoscopic repair (walking, P < 0.05; lifting a bag of groceries, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Chronic pain or discomfort was reported by 30.0 per cent of patients after groin hernia repair and was significantly more common after open mesh repair than after laparoscopic TEP repair. It restricted physical or sporting activities in 18.1 per cent of the patients and significantly more so after open mesh repair.     

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair in patients with poor esophageal motility or paraesophageal herniation

Laparoscopic repair for gastroesophageal reflux disease is now an accepted therapy. However, controversy exists with regard to the choice of operation between complete 360-degree Nissen fundoplication versus partial 270-degree Toupe fundoplication. In addition there is some controversy with regard to the proper choice of operation in patients with poor esophageal motility. Another class of hiatal hernia patients are those patients with paraesophageal herniation. Questions regarding the approach to these patients include whether or not to use a reflux procedure at the time of repair and the role of mesh in repair of these large hernias. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Toupe fundoplication in patients with both normal and abnormal esophageal motility. In addition the subset of patients with paraesophageal herniation was studied in an effort to ascertain the best surgical approach in these patients. In this study a retrospective analysis was performed on 188 consecutive patients during the period 1995 to 2001. All patients who presented with hiatal hernia surgical problems during this period were included. Endoscopy was performed in all patients with esophageal reflux. Manometry was performed in all patients except those presenting as emergency incarcerations. pH probe testing was performed in those patients in whom it was deemed necessary to establish the diagnosis. Upper gastrointestinal radiographs were used to define anatomy in paraesophageal hernia patients when possible. All patients with esophageal reflux were first treated with a trial of medical therapy. Patients with esophageal reflux and normal esophageal motility underwent 360-degree Nissen fundoplication. Those patients with poor esophageal motility (less than 65 mm of mercury) underwent laparoscopic 270-degree Toupe fundoplication. Patients presenting with paraesophageal herniation underwent laparoscopic repair. When possible esophageal manometry was performed on these patients preoperatively and if normal peristalsis was documented a Nissen fundoplication was performed. If poor esophageal motility was documented before surgery a Toupe fundoplication was performed. Mesh reinforcement of the diaphragmatic hiatus was used if necessary to complete a repair without tension. Patients were followed both by their primary gastroenterologist and their surgeon. Follow-up studies including endoscopy, pH probe, and upper gastrointestinal series were used as necessary in the postoperative period to document any problems as they occurred. Of the 188 patients in the study 141 patients underwent Nissen fundoplication, 21 patients underwent Nissen fundoplication and repair of paraesophageal hernia, 15 underwent Toupe fundoplication, seven underwent Toupe and paraesophageal hernia repair, and four paraesophageal hernia repair alone. One hundred eighty-three patients underwent a laparoscopic operation. Five patients of the 188 underwent an initial open operation-two of these patients because of the size of their paraesophageal hernia. Three of these patients had reoperations of remote operations done years before at other institutions. Twenty-two patients with poor esophageal motility (11.7 %) were included in the study. Fifteen patients required Toupe fundoplication whereas seven patients required Toupe fundoplication and repair of paraesophageal hernias. Mesh repair of paraesophageal hernias was accomplished in ten patients. Patients undergoing Toupe fundoplication had a 13 per cent dysphagia rate less than 4 weeks postoperatively and a 0% dysphagia rate greater than four weeks postoperatively. Patients undergoing Nissen fundoplication had a 16 per cent dysphagia rate less than 4 weeks postoperatively, 2 per cent dysphagia rate greater than 4 weeks postoperatively and no dysphagia at 6 weeks postoperatively. Recurrent symptomatic reflux occurred in 1.4 per cent of Nissen fundoplications and 6.7 per cent of Toupe fundoplications. Of Nissen and paraesophageal repairs 14.2 per cent had reflux and 14.3 per cent of Toupe and paraesophageal repairs had recurrent symptomatic reflux. Overall, complication rate was low. Use of mesh to repair large paraesophageal hernias resulted in a recurrence rate of 0 per cent. There was no instance of infection or bowel fistulization related to the use of mesh. We conclude that laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in patients with normal esophageal motility is associated with a low rate of dysphagia and a low rate of recurrent reflux. Toupe fundoplication when used in reflux patients with poor esophageal motility is associated with a low rate of dysphagia and an acceptable rate of recurrent reflux. Laparoscop     

Laparoscopy is increasingly used for pediatric inguinal hernia repair

IntroductionInguinal hernia repairs (IHR) are commonly performed by pediatric surgeons in the United States. The operative approach depends on surgeon preference with no definitive prospective studies comparing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) versus traditional inguinal hernia repair (TIHR). We aim to assess current practice, hypothesizing that laparoscopy is increasingly used for pediatric IHR.Material & MethodsThe Children's Hospital Association (CHA) Pediatric Health Information System was queried for IHRs performed between 01/01/2009 and 12/31/2018. Demographics, procedure type, hernia laterality, and cost were obtained. Patients were grouped by procedure type (laparoscopic/traditional).Results125,249 IHRs were performed at 32 CHA hospitals during the ten-year study period. 115,782 (92.4%) were TIHR and 9467 (7.6%) LIHR. Use of laparoscopy increased 5-fold from 3% to 15% over the study period. When comparing laparoscopic to traditional IHR groups, there were more females (28.3% vs 12.6%), African-Americans (19.7% vs 14.4%), government-insured (50% vs 45.2%), younger patients (4.2 vs 4.4 years), bilateral IHRs (11.4% vs 7.9%), and higher adjusted total hospital cost ($3,791 vs $2995) in the laparoscopic group (p<0.0001, all comparisons).ConclusionsLaparoscopy for pediatric IHR is increasing at CHA hospitals where nearly 1 in 6 children currently undergoes a laparoscopic repair. The long-term outcomes with laparoscopic repair are worthy of future study.     

Hospital Costs Associated With Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare the total hospital costs associated with elective laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Methods:

A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients who underwent elective inguinal herniorrhaphy from April 2009 to March 2011. A retrospective review of electronic patient records was performed along with a standardized case-costing analysis using data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. The main outcomes were operating room (OR) and total hospital costs.

Results:

Two hundred eleven patients underwent elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (117 open and 94 laparoscopic), and 33 patients underwent elective bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (9 open and 24 laparoscopic). OR and total hospital costs for open unilateral inguinal hernia repair were significantly lower than for the laparoscopic approach (median total cost, $3207.15 vs $3723.66; P < .001). OR and total hospital costs for repair of elective bilateral inguinal hernias were similar between the open and laparoscopic approaches (median total cost, $4574.02 vs $4662.89; P = .827).

Conclusions:

In the setting of a Canadian academic hospital, when considering the repair of an elective unilateral inguinal hernia, the OR and total hospital costs of open surgery were significantly lower than for the laparoscopic techniques. There was no statistical difference between OR and total hospital costs when comparing open surgery and laparoscopic techniques for the repair of bilateral inguinal hernias. Given the perioperative benefits of laparoscopy, further studies incorporating hernia-specific outcomes are necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of each approach and to define the optimal treatment strategy.     

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that better results are obtained after laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia than after conventional operation. This is most obvious for bilateral and recurrent hernias but less accepted for primary unilateral hernias. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial comparing transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic repair with the Shouldice technique in patients with primary unilateral hernia. Some 138 patients were randomized to laparoscopic hernia repair and 130 to open surgical repair. RESULTS: The complication rates in the two groups were similar. In the laparoscopic group the patients returned to work more rapidly with a median time of 13 versus 18 days (P < 0.005) and had a shorter period of analgesia intake with a median time of 2.1 versus 2.7 days (P < 0.02). The follow-up was 97.8 per cent complete. At a median of 12 months, four recurrences (2.9 per cent) were detected in the laparoscopic group and three (2.3 per cent) in the open group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in patients with a primary unilateral hernia laparoscopic repair results in less postoperative pain and a quicker recovery than open repair.     

Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy

BACKGROUND: Although a number of trials have analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy, the clinical advantages, and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy in the management of acute and perforated appendicitis are still not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to examine utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy using a national administrative database of academic medical centers and teaching hospitals. METHODS: Using ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes, we obtained data from the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Data Base for all patients who underwent appendectomy for acute and perforated appendicitis between 1999 and 2003 (n = 60,236). Trends in utilization of laparoscopic appendectomy were examined over the 5-year period. The outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy were compared including length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, complications, observed and expected (risk-adjusted) in-hospital mortality, and costs. RESULTS: Overall, 41,085 patients underwent open appendectomy and 19,151 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. The percentage of appendectomy performed by laparoscopy increased from 20% in 1999 to 43% in 2003 (P <0.01). Compared with patients who underwent open appendectomy, patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were more likely female, more likely white, had a lower severity of illness, and were less likely to have perforated appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (2.5 days vs 3.4 days), lower rate of 30-day readmission (1.0% vs 1.3%), and lower rate of overall complications (6.1% vs 9.6%). There was no significant difference in the observed to expected mortality ratio between laparoscopic and open appendectomy (0.5 vs 0.6, respectively). The mean cost per case was similar between the two groups (US$ 6,242 vs US$ 6,260). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of laparoscopic appendectomy at academic centers has increased more than two-fold between 1999 and 2003. Patients selected for laparoscopic appendectomy have less advanced appendicitis and have a shorter length of stay and fewer complications without increasing the inpatient care cost.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy in the morbidly obese

BackgroundMorbid obesity is associated with increased rates of hiatal and paraesophageal hernias. Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is gaining popularity as the procedure of choice for morbid obesity, there is little data regarding the management of paraesophageal hernias found intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of a combined sleeve gastrectomy and paraesophageal hernia repair in morbidly obese patients.MethodsFrom May 2011 to February 2013, 23 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with the repair of a paraesophageal hernia. Only 4 patients had a large hiatal hernia documented preoperatively on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The body mass index (BMI), operative time, length of stay, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe average operative time was 165 minutes (115–240 minutes) and length of stay was 2.83 days (2–6 days). All patients were female except for one, with an average age of 53.4 years and a BMI of 41.9 kg/m². There were no complications during the procedures. Mean follow-up was 6.16 months (1–19 months), and mean excess weight loss was 39%. The average cost of admission for a combined procedure ($10,056), was slightly higher than a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy ($8905) or laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair ($8954) done separately.ConclusionsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with a paraesophageal hernia repair is well-tolerated and feasible in morbidly obese patients. Surgeons should be aware that preoperative EGD is not effective at diagnosing large hiatal or paraesophageal hernias. Surgeons with the skill set to repair paraesophageal hernias should do a combined procedure because it is well-tolerated, feasible, and can reduce the cost of multiple hospital admissions.     

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia has become increasingly popular, its outcomes relative to open repair have not been well characterized. For this reason, we performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing open and laparoscopic ventral (including incisional) hernia repair. HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair results in better short-term outcomes than open ventral hernia repair. DATA SOURCES: Structured MEDLINE search for published studies. One unpublished study was also identified. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected on the basis of study design (comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair). The 3 main outcome measures were perioperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Of 83 potential studies identified by abstract review, 8 (10%) met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers assessed each article to determine eligibility for inclusion and, where appropriate, abstracted information on patient characteristics and main outcome measures. DATA SYNTHESIS: Across 8 studies, 390 patients underwent open repair and 322 underwent laparoscopic repair. Perioperative complications were less than half as likely to occur in patients undergoing laparoscopic repair (14% vs 27%; P =.03; odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.68). Average length of stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (2.0 vs 4.0 days; P =.02). No statistically significant difference in operative times was noted between laparoscopic and open repair (99 vs 96 minutes; P =.38). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair offers lower complication rates and shorter length of stay than open repair. However, randomized controlled trials and studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and to assess long-term rates of hernia recurrence.     

Incisional hernia risk after hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) bridges traditional open surgery and pure laparoscopy. The HALS technique provides the necessary site for organ retrieval, reduces operative time, and realizes the postoperative benefits of laparoscopic techniques. Although the reported rates of incisional hernia should be theoretically low, we sought to determine our incidence of hernia after HALS procedures. A retrospective review of all HALS procedures was performed from July 2006 to June 2011. All patients who developed postoperative incisional hernias at the hand port site were confirmed by imaging or examination findings. Patient factors were reviewed to determine any predictors of hernia formation. Over the 5 years, 405 patients undergoing HALS procedures were evaluated: colectomy (264), nephrectomy (107), splenectomy/pancreatectomy (18), and ostomy reversal (10). The overall incidence of incisional hernia was 10.6 per cent. There were three perioperative wound dehiscences. The mean body mass index was significantly higher in the hernia group versus the no hernia cohort (32.1 vs 29.2 kg/m(2); P = 0.001). The hernia group also had a higher incidence of renal disease (18.6 vs 7.2%; P = 0.018). Mean time to hernia formation was 11.4 months (range, 1 to 57 months). Follow-up was greater than 12 months in 188 (46%) of patients, in which the rate of incisional hernia was 17 per cent. The rate of incisional hernia formation after hand-assisted laparoscopic procedures is higher than the reported literature. Because the mean time to hernia development is approximately 1 year, it is important to follow these patients to this end point to determine the true incidence of incisional hernia after hand-assisted laparoscopy.     

Groin hernia repair in Scotland

BACKGROUND: The use of mesh for groin hernia repair has dramatically changed the way this common operation is performed. The aim of this study was to survey the methods of groin hernia repair in Scotland and to assess patient satisfaction with the operation. METHODS: Between 1 April 1998 and 31 March 1999 all patients who underwent groin hernia repair in the National Health Service in Scotland were identified. As well as looking at the type of hernia repair performed and postoperative morbidity, patients were sent a Short Form-36 about 3 months after the operation to assess satisfaction and return to normal activity. RESULTS: Information was obtained on 5506 (97 per cent) of patients who underwent groin hernia repair during the study period. Eighty-five per cent of patients had an open mesh repair and 4 per cent had a laparoscopic repair. Most operations (85 per cent) were performed using general anaesthesia on an inpatient basis (78 per cent), and 8 per cent were for repair of a recurrent hernia. Potentially serious intraoperative complications were rare (seven patients), although they were significantly (P < 0. 001) more likely to be associated with a laparoscopic approach or repair of a femoral hernia: relative risk compared with open inguinal hernia repair 33 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 6-197) and 22 (95 per cent c.i. 3-152) respectively. Wound complications were common and 10 per cent of patients required a district nurse to attend the wound. Patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction; 94 per cent would recommend the same operation to someone else if required. CONCLUSION: An open mesh repair using general anaesthesia has become the repair of choice for a groin hernia in Scotland. Despite a high incidence of wound complications, patients are satisfied with this operation.     

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs

Background: Although ventral hernia repair is increasingly performed laparoscopically, complication rates with this procedure are not well characterized. For this reason, we performed a prospective study comparing early outcomes after laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Methods: We identified all the patients undergoing ventral (including incisional) hernia repair at a single tertiary care center between September 1, 1999 and July 1, 2001 (overall n = 257). To increase the homogeneity of the sample, we excluded umbilical hernia repairs, parastomal hernia repairs, nonelective procedures, procedures not involving mesh, and repairs performed concurrently with another surgical procedure. Postoperative complications (in-hospital or within 30-days) were assessed prospectively according to standardized definitions by trained nurse clinicians. Results: Of the 136 ventral hernia repairs that met the study criteria, 65 (48%) were laparoscopic repairs (including 3 conversions to open surgery) and 71 (52%) were open repairs. The patients in the laparoscopic group were more likely to have undergone a prior (failed) ventral hernia repair (40% vs 27%; p = 0.14), but other patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, fewer complications were experienced by patients undergoing laparoscopic repair (8% vs 21%; p = 0.03). The higher complication rate in the open ventral hernia repair group came from wound infections (8%) and postoperative ileus (4%), neither of which was observed in the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. The laparoscopic group had longer operating room times (2.2 vs 1.7 h; p = 0.001), and there was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter hospital stays with laparoscopic repair (1.1 vs 1.5 days; p = 0.10). Conclusions: The patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had fewer postoperative complications than those receiving open repair. Wound infections and postoperative ileus accounted for the higher complication rates in the open ventral hernia repair group. Otherwise, these groups were very similar. Long-term studies assessing hernia recurrence rates will be required to help determine the optimal approach to ventral hernia repair. Drs. Birkmeyer and Finlayson were supported by Career Development Awards from the VA Health Services Research and Development program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.     

Prospective nationwide analysis of laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein repair of inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND: According to a Cochrane review, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compares favourably with open mesh repair, but few data exist from surgical practice outside departments with a special interest in hernia surgery. This study compared nationwide reoperation rates after laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair, adjusting for factors predisposing to recurrence. METHODS: Some 3606 consecutive laparoscopic repairs were compared with 39 537 Lichtenstein repairs that were prospectively recorded in a nationwide registry between 1998 and 2003. Patients were subgrouped according to type of hernia: primary or recurrent and unilateral or bilateral. Overall reoperation rates and 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated. Long-term reoperation rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The overall reoperation rates after laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair of unilateral primary indirect hernia (0 versus 1.0 per cent), primary direct hernia (1.1 versus 3.1 per cent), unilateral recurrent hernia (4.6 versus 4.8 per cent) and bilateral recurrent hernia (2.6 versus 7.6 per cent) did not differ. However, laparoscopic repair of a bilateral primary hernia was associated with a higher reoperation rate than Lichtenstein repair (4.8 versus 3.0 per cent) (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair compared favourably with Lichtenstein repair for primary indirect and direct hernias, and unilateral and bilateral recurrent hernias, but was inferior for primary bilateral hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated paraesophageal hernias

Paraesophageal hernias comprise only 2–5% of all hiatal hernias, yet unlike the more common sliding hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernias are prone to undergo volvulus, with obstruction, ischemia, and gangrenous perforation. Due to their propensity toward calamitous complications, they must be recognized and repaired as expeditiously as possible. Traditionally these hernias have been repaired by either an open transabdominal or an open transthoracic approach. Laparoscopic repair with Nissen fundoplication has already been successfully applied to the repair of the more common sliding hiatal hernia. Described here is the laparoscopic repair of two paraesophageal hernias. The merit of an anti-reflux procedure as part of this repair is discussed.     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has an acceptable recurrence rate

Recent literature has reported as high as a 42 per cent recurrence rate after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR). We report long-term follow-up in a cohort of patients undergoing LPEHR at Vanderbilt University. Thirty-one patients underwent attempted LPEHR between September 1993 and May 2000. Six of 31 patients (19%) were converted to an open procedure and were excluded from the study. All patients had complete excision of the sac, primary closure of the crura, and an antireflux procedure. An Institutional Review Board-approved follow-up barium esophagram was performed at a mean of 25 months postoperatively. Three experienced laparoscopic surgeons (K.S., M.H., and W.R.) collectively reviewed the esophagrams for evidence of recurrence. The mean age of patients was 61 years (range 41-92). There were six males and 19 females. Fifteen of 25 patients (60%) returned for an esophagram. Only one of 15 patients (7%) had a recurrent paraesophageal hernia. However, five of 15 patients (33%) had herniated an intact wrap 2 to 4 cm above the diaphragm. The patient with a true paraesophageal hernia recurrence returned with symptoms of dysphagia. Two of the five patients (40%) with a herniated wrap complained of heartburn, which was controlled with a proton pump inhibitor. All other patients were asymptomatic. Our recurrence rate of true paraesophageal hernias after LPEHR is low (7%) and compares with that reported in the literature for open repairs. However, 33 per cent of the patients in this study were found to have a herniated wrap. Because there is no risk of strangulation we have not operated on any of these patients. LPEHR is our procedure of choice for Type II and III hiatal hernias with good symptom relief and a low true recurrence rate.     

Open versus Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

Background:

The literature reports the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. However, its adoption as the preferred surgical approach and the risks associated with paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair have not been reviewed in a large database.

Method:

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset was queried from 1998 to 2005 for patients who underwent repair of a complicated (the entire stomach moves into the chest cavity) versus uncomplicated (only the upper part of the stomach protrudes into the chest) paraesophageal hiatal hernia via the laparoscopic, open abdominal, or open thoracic approach. A multivariate analysis was performed controlling for demographics and comorbidities while looking for independent risk factors for mortality.

Results:

In total, 23,514 patients met the inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 55% of patients underwent open abdominal, 35% laparoscopic, and 10% open thoracic repairs. Length of stay was significantly reduced for all patients after laparoscopic repair (P < .001). Age ≥60 years and nonwhite ethnicity were associated with significantly higher odds of death. Laparoscopic repair and obesity were associated with lower odds of death in the uncomplicated group.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with a lower mortality in the uncomplicated group. However, older age and Hispanic ethnicity increased the odds of death.     

A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair at a tertiary care center

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reportedly yields lower postoperative complications than open repair. We hypothesized that patients undergoing laparoscopic repair would have lower postoperative infectious outcomes. Also, certain preoperative patient characteristics and preoperative hernia characteristics are hypothesized to increase complication risk in both groups. All ventral hernia repairs performed at University of Virginia from January 2004 to January 2006 were reviewed. Primary outcomes included wound healing complications and hernia recurrence. Categorical data were analyzed with χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests. Continuous variables were evaluated with independent t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. A total of 268 repairs (110 open, 158 laparoscopic) were evaluated. Patient and hernia characteristics were similar between groups, though the percents of wound contamination (5.4% vs 0.6%; P = 0.02) and simultaneous surgery (7.2% vs 0%; P = 0.001) were greater in the open procedures. Univariate analysis also revealed that open cases had a greater incidence of postoperative superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (30.0% vs 10.7%; P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed that both diabetes and open repair were associated with an increased risk of superficial SSI (P = 0.019; odds ratio = 3.512; 95% confidence interval = 1.229-10.037 and P = 0.001; odds ratio = 4.6; 95% confidence interval = 1.9-11.2, respectively). Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair yielded lower rates of postoperative superficial SSI than open surgery. Other preoperative patient characteristics and preoperative hernia characteristics, with the exception of diabetes, were not found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications.     

Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers

BackgroundLaparoscopy is commonly being used in many different types of general surgical procedures. The aim of the present study was to examine the use of laparoscopy and perioperative outcomes in 7 general surgical operations commonly performed at U.S. academic medical centers.MethodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent 1 of the 7 general surgical operations from 2008 to 2012 were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium database. The University HealthSystem Consortium database contains data from all major teaching hospitals in the United States. The 7 analyzed operations included only elective, inpatient procedures (except for appendectomy): open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux, colectomy for colon cancer or diverticulitis, bariatric surgery for morbid obesity, ventral hernia repair for incisional hernia, appendectomy for acute appendicitis, rectal resection for rectal cancer, and cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. The outcome measures included the number of procedures, rate of laparoscopy, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and in-hospital mortality.ResultsDuring the 3.5-year period, 53,958 patients underwent bariatric surgery, 13,918 patients underwent antireflux surgery, 8654 patients underwent appendectomy, 8512 patients underwent cholecystectomy, 29,934 patients underwent colectomy, 17,746 patients underwent ventral hernia repair, and 4729 patients underwent rectal resection. The present rate of laparoscopic use was 94.0% for bariatric surgery, 83.7% for antireflux surgery, 79.2% for appendectomy, 77.1% for cholecystectomy, 52.4% for colectomy, 28.1% for ventral hernia repair, and 18.3% for rectal resection. In-hospital mortality was greatest for colorectal resection (.38%–.58%). In-hospital mortality for bariatric surgery (.06%) was comparable to that for appendectomy (.01%), cholecystectomy (.27%), antireflux surgery (.15%), and ventral hernia repair (.20%). The rate of laparoscopic conversion to open surgery was lowest for bariatric surgery (.89%) and greatest for rectal resection (16.4%).ConclusionWithin the context of academic centers and elective, inpatient procedures, bariatric surgery had the greatest use of laparoscopy and the lowest rate of laparoscopic conversion to open surgery. The mortality for laparoscopic bariatric surgery is now comparable to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, appendectomy, and antireflux surgery.     

Outcomes of emergent incisional hernia repair

This study examines the effect of emergent repair on incisional hernia repair outcomes at 16 Veteran's Affairs Medical Centers between 1998 and 2002. Of the 1452 cases reviewed, 63 (4.3%) were repaired emergently. Patients undergoing emergent repair were older (P = 0.02), more likely to be black (P = 0.02), and have congestive heart failure (P = 0.001) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.001). Of emergent repairs, 76.2 per cent involved intestinal incarceration versus 7.2 per cent of elective repairs (P < 0.0001), and 17.5 per cent had concomitant bowel resection compared with 3.9 per cent of elective cases (P < 0.0001). Patients undergoing emergent repair were also more likely to receive primary suture repair (49.2 vs 31.1%, P = 0.003), develop a postoperative complication (26.0 vs 11.3%, P = 0.002), and have increased postoperative length of stay (7 vs 4 days, P < 0.0001). There were nine (14.3%) deaths at 30 days for the emergent group compared with 10 (0.7%) in the elective group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between emergent and elective repairs in long-term complications. Emergent hernia repair is associated with increased mortality rates, early complications, and longer length of stay; however, long-term outcomes are equivalent to elective cases. These data suggest that technical outcomes for emergent repairs approach those of elective operations.     

Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes

Background

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a frequent complication following the creation of a stoma. While a significant number of cases require operative management, data comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias are limited.

Methods

The ACS-NSQIP was retrospectively reviewed from 2005 to 2011 for all PSH cases that underwent open or laparoscopic repair. Patients characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were listed for both procedure types. Selected end points were compared on multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Among the 2,167 identified parastomal hernia cases, only 222 (10.24 %) were treated laparoscopically. The open and laparoscopic groups were similar with respect to mean patient age (63 vs. 63 years; p = 1) and gender distribution as the majority of patients were females (56.8 %). However, open repair was more likely to be performed in patients with a higher ASA class (III and IV) (p < 0.001). Also, the open approach was more likely to be used emergently (8.64 vs. 3.60 %; p = 0.01) and for recurrent hernias (6.99 vs. 3.15 %; p < 0.05). After adjusting for all potential confounders including age, gender, ASA, emergency designation of the operation, hernia type, and wound class, laparoscopy was associated with shorter operative time (137.5 vs. 153.4 min; p < 0.05), shorter length of hospital stay by 3.32 days (p < 0.001), lower risk of overall morbidity (OR = 0.42; p < 0.001), and a lower risk of surgical site infections (OR = 0.35; p < 0.01) compared to open repair. Mortality rates were similar in the laparoscopic and open groups (0.45 vs. 1.59 %, respectively; p = 0.29).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is safe and appears to be associated with better short-term outcomes compared to open repair in selected cases. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm those results and to assess long-term recurrence rates.     

Short-term outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the morbidity, mortality, and short-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPHR). Methods: A series of 58 consecutive LPHRs performed by the author were reviewed with an average 1-year follow-up. Morbidity and mortality rates were compared with historical series of open repairs. Anatomy and technical considerations pertinent to LPHR were reviewed. Results: There were no procedure-related or perioperative deaths in this series of patients undergoing LPHR. Four major complications occurred (7%), two of which required reoperation, all in urgently repaired patients. One patient required conversion to laparotomy (1.7%). Based on symptoms, there were no reherniations. No patients had long-term dysphagia worse than preoperatively. Preoperative symptoms of chest pain, esophageal obstruction, hemorrhage, and reflux were resolved in all patients. Conclusions: LPHR is safe, effective, and compares favorably to historical series of open paraesophageal hernia repair. Received: 24 July 1996/Accepted: 20 November 1996