Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.     

Quality of life in patients after radical prostatectomy

According to the literature, after radical prostatectomy the patients had normal micturition and erectile function in 50 and 10-30%, respectively. A total of 647 patients with diagnosis prostatic cancer (PC) stage T1a-T4 were examined in two clinics in 1997-2003. Of them, 43 patients (PC stage T1a-T3a) have undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) by a modified nerve-preserving technique (preservation of the urinary bladder neck, puboprostatic joints in prostate size > 60 cm). Preoperative and postoperative examinations for urine continence and erectile function after RRP were made in 20 patients. The proposed operative technique of nerve-preserving RRP preserves urine continence and erectile function in many cases. This improves social adaptation of the patients and extends indications for operative treatment.     

Puboprostatic ligament sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy

Prostate cancer is the most common solid malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer death in man. Radical prostatectomy is the therapeutic modality that currently provides the best long-term biochemical relapse-free survival rate. Yet many patients select alternative forms of therapy or no therapy at all because of fears that treatment will significantly alter quality of life. Urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy has a significant deleterious effect on quality of life and, unfortunately, is much more prevalent following surgery compared with other treatment modalities, such as radiation therapy. Many efforts have been undertaken to avoid this complication with only modest success achieved. These include creation of a neobladder neck, bladder neck preservation, periurethral injection of bulking agents, and anterior urethropexy. A technique for radical retropubic prostatectomy that spares the puboprostatic ligaments, which preserves the normal anterior support of the urethra, is described herein. The outcome following this procedure demonstrates more rapid return of full urinary continence following radical prostatectomy in a controlled study. However, the "Holy Grail" of complete eradication of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy has not been achieved.     

Surgical aspects and innovations in localized prostate cancer]

In 1983, Walsh introduced anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy. With the surgical modifications that preserve neurovascular bundles, excellent cancer control can be achieved, while preserving erectile function and urinary continence in most appropriately selected patients. Since them, radical prostatectomy has become the most common treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Treatment results following radical prostatectomy will most likely continue to improve in the future as early detection is more widely practiced.     

The role of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Recent advances in our understanding of the surgical anatomy of the prostate have led to an improved operative technique for radical prostatectomy. This technique achieves excellent results in terms of urinary continence and preservation of sexual function without compromising cancer control. It is therefore reasonable to offer radical prostatectomy for the cure of localized prostate cancer to patients who are otherwise well and have a life expectancy of more than 10 years.     

Urinary continence following radical prostatectomy

An examination was made of pre- and postoperative variables for predicting urinary continence following radical prostatectomy in 94 consecutive patients. Postoperative recovery of urinary continence continued for up to 18 months, when it plateaued. No pads were required in 73.0% of the patients at 18 months. The interval until recovery of urinary continence following surgery averaged 4.0 +/- 3.3 months. Clinical stage, pathologic stage, tumor grade, tumor volume, preservation of neurovascular bundles, methods of bladder neck reconstruction, internal urethrotomy for anastomotic stricture and postoperative adjuvant external beam radiation therapy provided no indication of postoperative urinary incontinence. Preoperative endocrine therapy, preoperative prostate-specific antigen level of > or = 10.0 ng/ml and age < 70 years at the time of surgery were all associated with a greater probability of urinary incontinence. Multiple factors are involved in the etiology of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. In patients who had undergone surgery because of local progression following endocrine therapy associated with a high serum prostate-specific antigen level, a significantly inferior outcome was noted. Stricter criteria for indicating radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer are needed. Surgical techniques should also be improved for better overall continence.      

Bladder-neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy

The goal of the urologic surgeon performing total prostatectomy for prostate cancer is to eliminate the cancer and minimize the side effects associated with treatment. We believe that careful dissection of the prostate from the bladder can be performed in such a manner as to preserve most of the circular fibers of the bladder neck. This so-called bladder-neck preservation technique appears to reduce the risk of an anastomotic stricture and accelerate the return of urinary continence. An analysis of 676 consecutive prostatectomies revealed that 4.3% of the men had tumor touching the inked bladder neck margin. Only 1% had this as the only positive margin. Most of these patients had a preoperative prostate-specific antigen > 10 and a Gleason score of 7 or greater suggesting that bladder-neck preservation did not compromise the outcome of surgery. A more extensive resection of the bladder neck is not likely to be curative.     

Morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy following previous prostate resection

A total of 153 patients with prior prostate surgery underwent a radical retropubic prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate. Ninety-seven patients had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and 56 patients had undergone suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy (SPP). In 115 patients, the diagnosis of malignancy was made at the time of transurethral resection or enucleation. No perioperative deaths occurred and no patient suffered rectal injury or ureteral transection. Operative time and blood loss were similar between the TURP and SPP groups and were not different in a group of patients who had not had prior prostate surgery. Early and late complications occurred in eight patients (5.2%), of whom seven had had previous TURP. Complete urinary control was achieved in 96% (147) of the patients; stress incontinence was present in 4% (6 patients); and no patient was totally incontinent. Postoperative complications and the occurrence of stress incontinence were not related to the time elapsed between the previous prostate surgery and the radical prostatectomy. Sexual function was preserved in 32 (71%) of the 45 patients in whom we performed a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Residual cancer was found in the radical prostatectomy specimen in 77 (67%) of the stage A patients. Twenty-nine (25%) of the stage A and 13 (34%) of the stage B patients had pathological evidence of disease extension beyond the confined prostate. Follow-up was 6–92 months, with a mean of 32 months. Four patients died of prostatic cancer, two patients died without cancer, and five have evidence of disease progression; 142 (93%) are alive without evidence of disease. Although radical prostatectomy sometimes is more difficult after previous prostate surgery, operative complication rates, patient morbidity, and the opportunity for surgical cure are not different from those seen in patients with no history of previous prostate Operations. © Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

保留部分前列腺的全膀胱切除术治疗浸润性膀胱癌

背景与目的：经典的根治性膀胱切除术将膀胱和前列腺全部切除,术后阳痿和尿失禁发生率高。在肿瘤没有累及前列腺的情况下,根治术中保留部分前列腺可改善术后性功能和控尿功能,但对预后是否有影响尚不清楚。本文报告10例保留部分前列腺的改良全膀胱切除术的经验,阐述改良术式对术后性功能、控尿功能和肿瘤控制的影响。方法：对10例男性浸润性膀胱癌患者,先经尿道电切除部分前列腺,全膀胱切除时保留部分前列腺包囊。下尿路重建采用肠道新膀胱术,新膀胱与残留的前列腺包囊吻合。术后随访评价肿瘤控制、尿液控制和性功能情况。结果：术后病理分期均为T2NOM0。随访3～12个月(平均9个月),9例无瘤生存,l例低分化移行细胞癌患者术后2个月出现全身骨骼及淋巴转移;全部患者自主排尿,完全控尿9例,部分控尿l例;术前有性功能的8例中,术后6例保持阴茎勃起功能。结论：保留部分前列腺的改良全膀胱切除术可以较好保留下尿路控尿功能和阴茎勃起功能,但对肿瘤控制的远期影响有待进一步观察。     

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?

Radical prostatectomy has maintained a cardinal role in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has been introduced as a less invasive surgical approach. Available data on RALP versus open approaches were reviewed for surgical and cancer related outcomes. RALP is consistently associated with decreased blood loss and limited postoperative pain and hospital stay. Surgical margins seem similar between most reported series of RALP or open radical prostatectomy. Most intrainstitutional comparisons demonstrate better postoperative continence and potency with RALP, but there is still debate about whether results are superior to radical retropubic prostatectomy in the hands of a highly experienced surgeon. RALP provides outcomes at least comparable, and, in some measures, superior to open surgery. Refinements of instrumentation may provide even better results in the future.     

Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of nerve-sparing (NS) radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Location and incidence of positive surgical margins, recurrence, and time to recurrence were assessed in a consecutive series of 734 men who underwent RRP for localized prostate cancer from 1992 through February 2000. NS procedures were used in 33% (n = 240) of 734 patients studied. RESULTS: Surgical margins were positive for 24% (n = 58) and 31% (n = 152) of NS and non-NS patients, respectively (P =.06). No significant difference between the groups was found in location of positive margins (P =.92). Prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL, extraprostatic extension, tumor volume more than 20%, capsular penetration, Gleason score > or = 7, positive margins, and seminal vesicle invasion were associated with significantly increased risk of recurrence. However, NS patients were not at increased risk of recurrence compared with non-NS patients (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.72). The cumulative risk of recurrence within 3 and 5 years of surgery in NS patients was 9.7% and 14.4%, respectively, as compared with 17.1% and 21.1% for non-NS patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with localized prostate cancer, neither margin status nor biochemical-free survival within 5 years of surgery were altered by the nerve preservation technique. Given our experience, we recommend preservation of neurovascular bundles in these patients whenever the procedure is technically feasible.     

Utility of transrectal ultrasonography guidance and seven key elements of operative skill for early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

In the present study, we report the utility of transrectal ultrasonography guidance for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), and the effect of a novel surgical approach of 'seven key elements of operative skill for the early recovery of urinary continence' ('7 key elements'). Among 170 patients who underwent laparoscopic prostatectomy between July 2007 and June 2010, 72 were treated on the basis of these 7 key elements (group 1), which included the preservation of 1) endopelvic fascia, 2) bladder neck, 3) pelvic nerve, 4) membranous urethra, 5) urethral sphincter and fixation of the organ positioning with 6) bladder neck sling suspension, and 7) restoration of the Denonvilliers' fascia, while the remaining 98 were not (group 2). We compared the data for the two groups with regards to the time taken for recovery of continence, and post-operative course. Application of the 7 key elements led to significantly earlier recovery of continence. In group 1, the number of urinary pads used after surgery was significantly reduced at all of the examined time-points after surgery (1, 3, 6 and 12 months) (p<0.0001). In group 1, more than half of the patients (54%) achieved urinary continence within 3 months, 93% achieved it within 6 months, and all patients had achieved it within 12 months after surgery. However, in group 2, <10% of the patients (8.5%, p<0.0001) achieved continence within 3 months, and 23% (P<0.0001) achieved it within 6 months. Therefore, the results show that the 7 key elements of operative skill with transrectal ultrasonography guidance significantly improve the outcome of LRP, reducing the time required for the recovery of continence.     

Advanced carcinoma of the prostatic urethra in a patient with marked response to chemotherapy, leading to preservation of the bladder

We performed transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) for a 66-year-old man with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pathological examination diagnosed poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma of the urethra with broad prostatic permeation. Random bladder biopsies showed no malignancy, but a second TUR-P revealed urothelial carcinoma in the prostate and bladder neck. Computed tomography (CT) showed lymph node metastases from para-aortic to right/left external iliac and left obturator nodes, so clinical stage T3N2M0 carcinoma of the prostatic urethra was diagnosed. Given the presence of lymph node metastases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin 70 mg/m², ifosfamide 1.2 g/m² and docetaxel 70 mg/m² (PIT) was considered. After chemotherapy, CT showed complete response (CR) of all lymph nodes. Local control in the bladder was considered to be good, so total prostatectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was selected instead of total cystoprostatectomy. Pathological findings of surgical specimens showed no residual carcinoma in the prostatic urethra or lymph nodes, although prostatic adenocarcinoma was recognized. No recurrences or metastases have been encountered as of 3 years and 5 months since surgery.     

Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the preoperative factors associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 339 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic. None received preoperative adjuvant therapy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 66 years (range, 45 to 79 years). All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Positive surgical margin was defined as the presence of cancer cells at the inked margins. Numerous pathologic characteristics in needle biopsies and preoperative clinical findings were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 24%. In univariate analysis, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, perineural invasion, percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens, and number and percentage of biopsy cores involved by cancer were all associated with positive surgical margins. In multivariate analysis, preoperative serum PSA level (odds ratio for a doubling of PSA levels, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 2.4; P <.001) and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens (odds ratio for a 10% increase, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4; P <.001) were predictive of margin status in radical prostatectomy. With use of preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy as predictors of surgical margins, the overall accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum PSA level and percentage of cancer in the biopsy specimens were independently associated with surgical margin status in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The combination of these two factors provides a high level of predictive accuracy for margin status.     

Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: Optimizing the surgical approach

As advances in the understanding of prostatic anatomy led to improvements in functional and oncologic outcomes after prostatectomy of the past few decades, advances in technology and surgical technique have made minimally-invasive prostate surgery a reality. Today patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer have more surgical treatment options than in the past including open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Advantages and disadvantages exist for each modality and lead to subtle differences in the technical execution of the procedure. Evidence from centers of excellence and from experienced surgeons demonstrates that both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy appear to be comparable to outcomes achieved with open radical retropubic prostatectomy series. Individual surgeon skill, experience and clinical judgment are likely the stronger predictors of outcome rather than the technique chosen. However, learning curves, oncologic outcomes and cost-efficacy remain important considerations in the dissemination of minimally-invasive prostate surgery. A greater appreciation of the periprostatic anatomy and further modification of surgical technique will result in continued improvement in functional outcomes and oncological control for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, whether by open or minimally-invasive surgery.     

Neobladders: clinical management and considerations for patients receiving chemotherapy

Continent catheterizable urinary reservoirs and orthotopic bladder substitutes are complex surgical endeavors. The goal is preservation of renal function, reliable continence, and storage intervals acceptable to the patient. The construction requires familiarity with bowel segments and may increase operative time for radical cystoprostatectomy by 30% to 50%. Patients with continent reservoirs have improved body image, work habits, and sexual and interpersonal relationships. Experience with patients with dysfunctional neurogenic bladders previously converted to Bricker urostomies now undiverted to continent reservoirs indicates an overall increase in physical activity and self-satisfaction. These patients are tolerant of reoperations to maintain independence from wet urostomies. Undoubtedly, the expectations of bladder cancer patients will differ from those of young adults with neurogenic bladder, but we have found that when all options are presented patients will seek out therapy that least alters their body image. Therefore, patient selection becomes an important factor in determining the success of continent reservoirs. Patients must have the dexterity and motivation to catheterize the urinary reservoir, irrigate for mucus and, in cases of orthotopic bladder replacement to urethra, accept the need for artificial sphincter placement in 30% to 40% of cases. Management of the neo-bladders requires additional consideration of several practical and theoretic points for both the surgeon and medical oncologist: 1. Patients with diffuse carcinoma in situ or transitional cell carcinoma at the bladder neck or prostatic urethra should undergo simultaneous urethrectomy excluding orthotopic bladder replacement. 2. Ten percent to 40% of patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for transitional cell cancer will have concomitant underdiagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate; patient prognosis will remain defined by the stage and grade of the bladder cancer. 3. Patients may have a tendency toward dehydration because of increased loss of free water through bowel transit. 4. Absorption of chloride, ammonium, and hydrogen ions may cause hyperchloremic acidosis, especially in face of imparied renal function. 5. Because of the potential for drug absorption across reservoir mucosa, patients receiving chemotherapy may require Foley catheterization with irrigation in addition to intravenous hydration. 6. Creatinine clearance is unsuitable for studying the renal function of reservoir patients because urine passes through the intestinal segment where creatinine is absorbed; glomerular filtration is better estimated by nuclear scanning with the reservoir emptied. 7. Most reservoirs will remain colonized with bacteria. 8. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the patient with temporary impairment of immune function during chemotherapy may be necessary. 9. Mucus may entrap bacteria serving as a host defense; its production may diminish with time from construction. All patients should be capable of performing reservoir irrigations to manage mucus obstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Management of the dorsal vein complex during radical retropubic prostatectomy

An understanding of the prostatic dorsal venous anatomy allows dissection of the prostatic apex in a manner that results in minimal bleeding while preserving the rhabdosphincter, urethra, and neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. This article reviews the pertinent venous anatomy of the prostatic apex. A surgical technique is described that allows secure venous control and that has resulted in consistently low blood loss and an allogeneic transfusion rate of less than 1% of patients.     

Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The correlation of surgical margins and extraprostatic extension (EPE) with progression is uncertain with regard to prostate carcinoma patients treated by radical prostatectomy. The objective of this study was to define factors predictive of cancer progression; emphasis was placed on surgical margins and their relation to extraprostatic extension. METHODS: The study group consisted of 377 patients who were treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Mayo Clinic between 1986 and 1993. All specimens were totally embedded and whole-mounted. Patients ranged in age from 41 to 79 years (mean, 65 years). Those with seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis and those treated preoperatively with radiation or androgen deprivation were excluded. Final pathologic T classifications were pT2a (41 patients), pT2b (237), and pT3a (99). Progression was defined as biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen [PSA] >0.2 ng/mL), clinical or biopsy-proven local recurrence, or distant metastasis. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (range, 0.2-11.4 years). Seventy-nine patients who received adjuvant treatment within 3 months after surgery were excluded from survival analysis. RESULTS: The overall margin positivity rate was 29%. Seventy-two patients (19%) had only positive surgical margins without evidence of EPE ("surgical incision"), 53 (14%) had only EPE, 37 (10%) had both, and 215 (57%) had neither. Positive margins were correlated with the finding of EPE (P = 0.003). Progression free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 88% and 67%, respectively. In univariate analysis, preoperative PSA concentration, positive surgical margins, Gleason grade, cancer volume, and DNA ploidy were significant in predicting progression (P values, <0.001, <0.001, 0.01, 0.007, and <0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression (relative risk for margin status, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.4; P = 0.03; relative risk for DNA ploidy, 5.1; 95% CI, 2.4-10.9; P<0.001). Among patients with positive margins, 5-year progression free survival was 78% for those with negative EPE and 55% for those with positive EPE. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical margin status and DNA ploidy were independent predictors of progression after radical prostatectomy. To improve cancer control, adjuvant therapy may be considered for patients with positive surgical margins or nondiploid cancer.     

Urothelial carcinoma in the prostatic urethra and prostate: current controversies

We reviewed the literature on urothelial carcinoma in the prostatic urethra and prostate. We concluded that the incidence of urothelial carcinoma in the prostatic urethra and prostate is probably underestimated. This fact warrants thorough follow-up of patients with high-risk bladder cancers and also whole-mount examination of the prostate after cystectomy to recognize the true incidence and extent of such tumor involvement. Resectoscope loop biopsy is the method of choice to detect urothelial carcinoma in the prostatic urethra/prostate and such biopsies should include the area around the verumontanum to ensure optimal sensitivity. Carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra should be treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and a transurethral resection of the prostate prior to that treatment might increase the contact of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin with the prostatic urethra, improve staging and in itself treat the prostatic involvement. Conservative treatment of carcinoma in situ in the prostatic ducts is an option, although radical surgery is probably best for treating extensive intraductal involvement, since data on the former strategy are inconclusive. Patients with stromal invasion should undergo radical surgery. It is necessary to take the route of prostatic involvement into account when estimating prognosis in each individual patient, since contiguous growth into the prostate is associated with worse prognosis. Prospective studies using a whole-mount technique to investigate the prostate are needed to clarify both the role of different routes of prostate invasion and the prognostic significance of different degrees of prostate invasion. At cystectomy, when urothelial carcinoma is present in the prostatic urethra and/or prostate, it is necessary to balance the risk of urethral recurrence and decreased sexual function against opinion and expectations expressed by the patient during preoperative counseling regarding urinary diversion and primary urethrectomy.     

Counterpoint: robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: perhaps the surgical gold standard for prostate cancer care

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has gained immense popularity. This article examines the most critical outcome measures in prostate cancer surgery and shows the reasons why this technique is gaining in popularity. Operative time, length of stay, blood loss, transfusions, postoperative pain, continence, potency, and cancer control all favor or tend toward improvement and benefit in RALP compared with traditional radical retropubic prostatectomy. In addition, as even greater experience and technological improvements are incorporated, further outcome improvements will be appreciated. RALP is now an accepted treatment option for prostate cancer and may soon be the most desirable treatment of prostate cancer patients.