A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

Capecitabine and docetaxel are both active against a variety of solid tumours, while their toxicity profiles only partly overlap. This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and side-effects of the combination, and to establish whether there is any pharmacokinetic interaction between the two compounds. Thirty-three patients were treated with capecitabine administered orally twice daily on days 1-14, and docetaxel given as a 1 h intravenous infusion on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. The dose of capecitabine ranged from 825 to 1250 mg m(-2) twice a day and of docetaxel from 75 to 100 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was asthenia grade 2-3 at a dose of 1000 mg m(-2) bid of capecitabine combined with docetaxel 100 mg m(-2). Neutropenia grade 3-4 was common (68% of courses), but complicated by fever in only 2.4% of courses. Other non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs. Tumour responses included two complete responses and three partial responses. Capecitabine 825 mg m(-2) twice a day plus docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) was tolerable, as was capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) twice a day plus docetaxel 75 mg m(-2).     

A phase I study of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of administering docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône- Poulenc-Rorer) as a one-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a bolus i.v. injection for five (days 1–5) or three (days 1–3) consecutive days every four weeks.Patients and methods: Thirty-seven patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with 115 total courses involving seven dose levels of the two regimens of docetaxel and 5-FU (docetaxel/5-FU [mg/m2]/mg/m2/d]). In an effort to reduce fluid retention and hypersensitivity phenomena related to docetaxel, patients received premedication with dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for three consecutive days beginning 24 hours before treatment.Results: Severe (grade 4) neutropenia lasting longer than seven days with or without fever and/or severe mucositis, precluded further dose escalation above docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2/day administered on days 1–5 every four weeks. The rates of these toxic effects were also unacceptably high above docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5- FU 300 mg/m2/day administered on days 1–3 every four weeks. Nine patients experienced various manifestations of fluid- retention that were potentially related to study drugs. However, neither treatment delay nor discontinuation of treatment was required. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue, were mild to modest in severity and occurred infrequently (<10% of courses). Two patients with metastatic breast cancer experienced complete responses and a partial response occurred in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the regimen of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d i.v. for three or five days every four weeks is well tolerated and these doses are recommended for further evaluations. The feasibility of administering docetaxel 60 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2 for three or five days every four weeks and the preliminary antitumor activity noted indicate that further disease-directed studies of docetaxel and 5-FU are warranted in patients with relevant solid malignancies.     

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.     

A phase I study of oral uracil-ftorafur plus folinic acid in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Ftorafur is an orally available prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Its combination with uracil in a molar ratio of 1:4 (UFT) increases the 5-FU concentration in tumor cells compared with ftorafur alone. Paclitaxel has a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors and synergic effects with UFT have been demonstrated in vitro. A phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of UFT and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. STUDY DESIGN: UFT and folinic acid were applied at 300 mg/m2/day and 90 mg/day, respectively, on days 1-28, repeated on day 36. Paclitaxel was applied on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 50 mg/m2 and escalation in 10 mg/m2 steps was performed up to 100 mg/m2 weekly. RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients with various solid tumors have been included in six different dose levels. One hundred and thirty cycles have been applied. The treatment was well tolerated overall. Most frequently encountered adverse effects were gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity (diarrhea CTC 3/4 in 6% of patients, anemia in 11%, leukocytopenia in 9%, polyneuropathy in 9%, fatigue in 11%, other in 6%). Partial remissions were observed in 28% of patients. CONCLUSION: Owing to the lack of overlapping toxicities, UFT/folinic acid plus paclitaxel can be combined at doses of proven single agent activity. Side effects are mainly attributable to the gastrointestinal toxicity of UFT and to the neuro- and hematotoxicity of paclitaxel. The recommended doses for phase II studies are 300 mg/m2 of UFT plus 90 mg of folinic acid on days 1-28, and 90 mg/m2 of paclitaxel weekly.     

A phase I study of E7080, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

The objectives of this phase I study were to assess the safety and tolerability of E7080 in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics profile of E7080; and to explore preliminary evidence of its anti-tumour efficacy.

Methods:

E7080 was administered orally in escalating doses on a once-daily continuous schedule in 28-day cycles to eligible patients. Samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2. Anti-tumour efficacy was assessed every two cycles.

Results:

Eighty-two patients received E7080 in dose cohorts from 0.2 to 32 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 proteinuria (two patients) at 32 mg, and the MTD was defined as 25 mg. The most frequently observed cumulative toxicities (all grades) were hypertension (40% of patients), diarrhoea (45%), nausea (37%), stomatitis (32%) and vomiting (23%). Seven patients (9%) had a partial response and 38 patients (46%) had stable disease as best response. E7080 has dose-linear kinetics with no drug accumulation after 4 weeks'' administration.

Conclusion:

E7080 is well tolerated at doses up to 25 mg per day. Encouraging anti-tumour efficacy was observed in patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.     

A phase I trial of ispinesib, a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study is to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and efficacy of ispinesib (SB-715992) in combination with docetaxel. Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with ispinesib (6-12 mg m(-2)) and docetaxel (50-75 mg m(-2)). Docetaxel was administered over 1 h followed by a 1-h infusion of ispinesib on day 1 of a 21-day schedule. At least three patients were treated at each dose level. Blood samples were collected during cycle 1 for PK analysis. Clinical response assessments were performed every two cycles using RECIST guidelines. Twenty-four patients were treated at four dose levels. Prolonged neutropaenia and febrile neutropaenia were dose limiting in six and two patients, respectively. The MTD was ispinesib 10 mg m(-2) with docetaxel 60 mg m(-2). Pharmacokinetic assessment demonstrated concentrations of ispinesib and docetaxel, consistent with published data from single agent studies of the drugs. Seven patients (six hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), one renal cancer) had a best response of stable disease (>or=18 weeks). One patient with HRPC had a confirmed >50% prostatic-specific antigen decrease. The MTD for ispinesib and docetaxel was defined and the combination demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile. Preliminary PK data suggest no interaction between ispinesib and docetaxel.     

A phase Ib study of pertuzumab, a recombinant humanised antibody to HER2, and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

Pertuzumab represents the first in a new class of targeted therapeutics known as HER dimerisation inhibitors. We conducted a phase Ib study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, the dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction of docetaxel when administered in combination with pertuzumab. Initially, two dose levels of docetaxel (60 and 75 mg m(-2)) were explored in combination with a fixed dose of 1050 mg of pertuzumab; then two dose levels of docetaxel (75 and 100 mg m(-2)) were explored in combination following a fixed dose of 420 mg of pertuzumab with a loading dose of 840 mg. Both drugs were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The latter dose of pertuzumab was allowed after an amendment to the original protocol when phase II data suggesting no difference in toxicity or activity between the 2 doses became available. Two patients out of two treated at docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) in combination with pertuzumab 1050 mg suffered DLT (grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 4 febrile neutropaenia). Two out of five patients treated at docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) in combination with pertuzumab 420 mg with a loading dose of 840 mg suffered DLT (grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 febrile neutropaenia). Stable disease was observed at four cycles in more than half of the patients treated and a confirmed radiological partial response with a >50% decline in PSA in a patient with hormone refractory prostate cancer were observed. There were no pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. The recommended phase II dose of this combination was docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) and 420 mg pertuzumab following a loading dose of 840 mg.     

A phase I, dose-escalation study of TB-403, a monoclonal antibody directed against PlGF, in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND: TB-403 (RO 5323441), a humanised monoclonal antibody, is a novel antiangiogenesis agent directed against placental growth factor. The safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumour activity of TB-403 were assessed in a phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Patients in sequential dose groups received either weekly doses of 1.25, 5.0, or 10 mg kg(-1) or doses of 20 or 30 mg kg(-1) every third week.Results:Twenty-three patients were enrolled and received TB-403. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, constipation, pyrexia, dyspnoea, and nausea. One serious AE, a lung embolus in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with 10 mg kg(-1) weekly, was deemed possibly related to TB-403. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and a maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. The PK parameters were dose linear and the terminal half-life values ranged from 9 to 14 days. Six patients exhibited stable disease for at least 8 weeks. Two patients, (oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma) both treated with 5 mg kg(-1) weekly, remained stable for 12 months.Conclusion:TB-403 treatment in this patient population is well tolerated, with a safety profile distinct from that of vascular endothelial growth factor-axis inhibitors.     

Weekly docetaxel in minimally pretreated cancer patients: A dose-escalation study focused on feasibility and cumulative toxicity of long-term administration

Background: Docetaxel is an agent with impressive clinical activity but a rather poor profile of toxicity when given every three weeks. Therefore, optimisation of its clinical use is highly warranted. This is a dose-escalation study of weekly docetaxel particularly focused on the feasibility of long-term administration and characterisation of cumulative toxicity.Patients and methods: Twenty-six patients (11 female/15 male, median age 56, range 23–73) were treated over the range of 25–50 mg/m²/week. Dose-limiting toxicity for this schedule was defined as any grade >2 antiproliferative toxic effect resulting in a >2-week delay for re-administration of the drug, or any grade >2 organ-specific toxicity. Patients were monitored clinically and electrophysiologically for neurotoxicity. No prolonged corticosteroid co-medication or prophylactic haematopoietic growth factors were given.Results: A median/mean number of 8.5/8.7 consecutive weekly courses were given per patient. The maximum tolerated dose that prevented on-schedule administration of the drug was 50 mg/m². The main cumulative toxicities were a mild fluid retention and dacryorrhea which became evident as the number of treatment courses increased. Grade 2 alopecia and fatigue were observed only at 45 mg/m² and higher. Activity was seen at all of the dose levels studied.Conclusions: Long-term weekly administration of docetaxel is feasible at doses up to 45 mg/m²/week with acceptable toxicity. Further clinical evaluation is justified at this schedule and 40 mg/m²/week of docetaxel is proposed for phase II studies as an active dose with minimal toxicity.     

A phase I dose-escalation study of aflibercept administered in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics of aflibercept, and to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of aflibercept in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin.

Methods:

Aflibercept was administered at escalating doses of 2, 4, or 6 mg kg⁻¹ in combination with fixed doses of pemetrexed (500 mg m⁻²) plus cisplatin (75 mg m⁻²) every 3 weeks. Blood samples were collected for PK analyses. Serum antiaflibercept antibodies were quantified to assess their impact on systemic aflibercept concentrations.

Results:

Eighteen patients were enrolled. One patient dosed at 4 mg kg⁻¹ experienced grade 3 hypophosphatemia (dose-limiting toxicity; DLT), which prompted a cohort expansion. No further DLTs were observed in the 4 mg kg⁻¹ cohort or the 6 mg kg⁻¹ dose cohort. Most common adverse events (AEs) of all grades included (%): fatigue (89), anaemia (89), nausea (83), hyponatremia (78), and neutropenia (72). Grade ⩾3 AEs consistent with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy included (%): hypertension (22), pulmonary embolism (11), and deep vein thrombosis (6). Five patients (28%) experienced mild neurocognitive disturbance. No episodes of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) were noted.

Conclusion:

The results of this phase I study allowed further evaluation of the combination of aflibercept with pemetrexed and cisplatin in a phase II study. The RP2D of aflibercept was 6 mg kg⁻¹, to be administered intravenously every 3 weeks in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin.     

Attempted dose intensified cyclophosphamide,etoposide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for treatment of malignant astrocytoma

Summary Patients with malignant astrocytoma continue to respond poorly to chemotherapy and have a dismal prognosis. Cyclophosphamide (CTX) and etoposide demonstrate activity against malignant astrocytoma at standard dosages, with bone marrow suppression as the limiting toxicity. In order to allow dose intensification, minimize leukopenia, and improve efficacy granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used in combination with CTX and etoposide. The protocol consisted of CTX (2 mg/m²/d, days 1, 2), etoposide (200–300 mg/m²/d, days 1–3), and G-CSF (5–10 g/d subcutaneously, days 4–18), every 4 weeks. Nine evaluable patients (7 glioblastoma multiforme, 2 anaplastic astrocytoma) were treated, ranging in age from 26–67 (mean 41). One of 9 patients responded (11%) with a partial response (13+ months), 3 had stable disease (33%; 8, 5, 2.5 months), and 5 had progressive disease (3, 2.5, 2, 1.5, 1 months). The median time to progression for responders was 6.5 months, while overall it was 2.5 months. Overall median survival was only 7.0 months. Toxicity was frequent and severe, typically delaying treatment cycles. The most common complications were severe myeolosuppression (9), sepsis (8), rash (6), urinary infection (5), and anorexia (5). Treatment delays caused by infections and other complications occurred often, abrogating the intended dose intensification. The received dose intensity (DI) for CTX was 400–425 mg/m²/week (relative DI 0.41), while for etoposide it was 75 mg/m²/ week (relative DI 0.42). In summary, as used in this protocol, dose intensive chemotherapy with CTX, etoposide, and G-CSF does not improve efficacy over standard regimens and results in excessive toxicity.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced cancer: dose escalation possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, but not with prophylactic antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0 to 2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide repeated every 21 days. The cyclophosphamide dose was fixed at 600 mg/m(2) and the dose levels studied were: docetaxel/epirubicin; 60/60, 75/60, 75/75, 75/90, 85/90 and 85/105 mg/m(2). There was provision for the addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in separate steps if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia related. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity, predominantly febrile neutropenia, was surprisingly seen at the first dose level. The addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin did not permit dose escalation, but dose escalation was possible with the addition of G-CSF. The highest administered dose level with G-CSF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 105 mg/m(2) with DLTs in five of six patients. Treatment was well tolerated in 10 patients treated at the recommended dose level (85/90) with only one patient experiencing DLT. Responses were seen in a range of malignancies including breast and anaplastic thyroid cancers. No significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed, but a transient increase in epirubicinol plasma concentration occurred during and after docetaxel infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose level of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) with G-CSF support has a favorable toxicity profile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II and III trials.     

A single-blind, randomised, vehicle-controlled dose-finding study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers and lymphoma

This study evaluated the effect of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuGCSF; lenograstim) on neutrophil granulocyte counts and on cells of other haematopoietic lineages in 66 patients with solid cancer or lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Beginning 1 day after completion of chemotherapy, patients received lenograstim (at dosages of 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 μ/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously once daily for 14 consecutive days. Compared with vehicle, lenograstim significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy in a dose-dependent manner. Mean neutrophil counts recovered to > 1.0 × 10⁹ cells/l by day 13 in the vehicle group compared with days 11, 10, 8 and 7 in the 0.5, 2, 5 and 10 μg/kg lenograstim groups, respectively. Doses of 0.5 and 2 μg/kg of lenograstim had a significant effect on the duration of neutropenia (< 1.0 × 10⁹ cells/l), the area under the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) curve and the time to ANC nadir. The dose of 5 μg/kg additionally decreased the total area of neutropenia and gave the narrowest range of values for all neutrophil parameters, while the 10 μg/kg dose brought no added benefit. A dose-response effect of lenograstim on time to neutrophil recovery was observed both for patients who received chemotherapy on a single day (n = 35) and for those who received chemotherapy over several days (n = 29). Based on these findings, a dose of 5 μg/kg/day was chosen for further trials.     

A phase II study of escalated-dose docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in patients with advanced breast cancer

Purpose: Docetaxel is highly active in the treatment of patients withbreast cancer. The principal dose-limiting toxicities of the3-weekly regimen are neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. Ina previous phase I dose-escalation study with granulocyte colony-stimulatingfactor (G-CSF) support, the recommended dose was determinedto be docetaxel 160 mg/m² 3-weekly. The objectives of this phaseII study were to determine the response rate and toxicity ofthis dose and schedule, given as first-line in patients withadvanced breast cancer. Mobilisation of peripheral blood stemcells (PBSCs) was also investigated. Patients and methods: Eligible women had metastatic breast cancer and were aged 18–75years with ECOG performance status 2. Strict criteria for liverfunction were followed, and adjuvant chemotherapy must havebeen completed at least 6 months previously. Treatment was docetaxel160 mg/m² over 60–90 min every 21 days withG-CSF 5 µg/kg/day until neutrophil recovery, for up tosix cycles. A 3-day corticosteroid prophylaxis was given. Bloodssamples to determine PBSC levels [CD34+, granulocyte–macrophagecolony-forming cells (GM-CFC) and burst-forming units-erythroid(BFU-E)] were taken on days 6, 8, 9 and 11 following docetaxel. Results: Twenty-five women with median age 50 years (range 35–66)were included. Seventeen (68%) had previously received adjuvantchemotherapy. In total, 112 cycles were delivered (median fourper patient), with dose reductions required in 12.5% of cycles.G-CSF was given for a median of 6 days. The median neutrophilnadir was 0.5 x 10⁹/l and occurred a median 5 days after treatment.The median duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 2 days (range1–7). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients,but there was only one episode of febrile neutropenia. Fivepatients were taken off study due to toxicities that includedoedema, neurosensory toxicity and asthenia. Confirmed partialresponse was seen in nine patients (37.5%; 95% confidence interval19% to 59%). CD34+ cells, GM-CFC and BFU-E levels peaked atday 8 following docetaxel administration. The median CD34+ cellpeak was 6.5 x 10⁴/ml, with only 20% of patients <2 x 10⁴/ml,a level below which leukapheresis is not usually attempted. Conclusions: Docetaxel 160 mg/m² was delivered with G-CSF support with avery low rate of febrile neutropenia. Non-haematological toxicitywas significant, causing five patients to go off study. Effectivemobilisation of PBSCs was seen. The response rate of 37.5% wasless than that obtained in first-line studies using standard-dosedocetaxel 100 mg/m², suggesting that there is no additionalbenefit in dose escalation of this cytotoxic agent in breastcancer patients using this schedule. P. L. R. Mitchell^1,*, R. Basser², M. Chipman¹, A. Grigg³, R. Mansfield³, J. Cebon¹, I. D. Davis¹, F. Appia⁴ and M. Green³ Centre for Developmental Cancer Therapeutics (CDCT), ¹ Austin Hospital, ² Western Hospital and ³ Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; ⁴ Aventis, Melbourne, Australia and Paris, France Key words: breast cancer, docetaxel, dose escalation, G-CSF, mobilisation, peripheral blood stem cells, phase II trial, toxicity     

A phase I trial of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer

Background:Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active in a broad rangeof malignancies. The objective of this phase I trial was to determine themaximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine. Patients and methods:Patients with advanced cancer, WHOperformance status 0–2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapyregimen were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel on day 8repeated every 21 days. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin was commenced on day 11 ofeach cycle and continued until the neutrophil count reached 1.0 ×10⁹/l. G-CSF was not administered. Dose levels studied weredocetaxel/gemcitabine: 60/800, 60/1000, 75/1000, 75/1200, 85/1200 and 100/1200mg/m². Results:Thirty-nine patients were entered and all were assessablefor toxicity. The highest administered dose level was 100 mg/m²docetaxel and 1200 mg/m² gemcitabine with dose limiting toxicitiesof febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia 7 days, grade 4thrombocytopenia, grade 3 stomatitis and/or grade 3 fatigue in three out ofsix patients. Treatment was well tolerated (40 cycles) in the 10 patientstreated at the recommended dose level (85/1200) with only a single episode offebrile neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was infrequent.There was no significant pulmonary toxicity. Responses were seen in a rangeof malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer. Conclusions:The recommended dose level of 85 mg/m²docetaxel and 1200 mg/m² gemcitabine has a favourable toxicityprofile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II trials. Thisnon-platinum containing regimen warrants further investigation as a potentialalternative to platinum containing regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer andother malignancies.     

A multicenter phase 1 study of PX-866 in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This phase I, dose-finding study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of PX-866, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, combined with docetaxel in patients with incurable solid tumours.

Methods:

PX-866 was administered at escalating doses (4–8 mg daily) with docetaxel 75 mg m⁻² intravenously every 21 days. Archived tumour tissue was assessed for potential predictive biomarkers.

Results:

Forty-three patients were enrolled. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. The most frequent study drug-related AE was diarrhoea (76.7%), with gastrointestinal disorders occurring in 79.1% (docetaxel-related) and 83.7% (PX-866-related). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was 8 mg, the same as the single-agent MTD. Co-administration of PX-866 and docetaxel did not affect either drug''s PKs. Best responses in 35 evaluable patients were: 2 partial responses (6%), 22 stable disease (63%), and 11 disease progression (31%). Eleven patients remained on study for >180 days, including 8 who maintained disease control on single-agent PX-866. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 73.5 days (range: 1–569). A non-significant association between longer PFS for PIK3CA-MUT/KRAS-WT vs PIK3CA-WT/KRAS-WT was observed.

Conclusion:

Treatment with PX-866 and docetaxel was well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping/cumulative toxicity. Further investigation with this combination is justified.     

重组人粒细胞刺激因子在乳癌治疗中不良反应的分析

目的:分析在乳腺癌治疗中重组人粒细胞刺激因子注射液致药物不良反应(ADR)发生的特点。方法:收集并分析2006年1月至2009年11月我科重组人粒细胞刺激因子注射液致不良反应病例。结果:重组人粒细胞刺激因子注射液致不良反应,临床表现多数为过敏反应,反应较轻,尚有罕见严重的不良反应。结论:临床应重视重组人粒细胞刺激因子注射液使用的安全性问题。     

A phase I combination dose-escalation study of eribulin mesylate and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours: a study of the Princess Margaret Consortium

Background:

Eribulin mesylate is a synthetic microtubule inhibitor that showed cytotoxic synergy in combination with gemcitabine preclinically. This combination was assessed in a Phase I dose-finding trial in patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumours who had received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease (CP cohort).

Methods:

Dose escalation was performed in a 3+3 design to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Two additional expansion cohorts in women with gynaecologic cancers at the RP2D (G), and further dose escalation of metastatic chemotherapy-naive patients (CN), were evaluated.

Results:

45 patients were treated: 21 (CP), 10 (G) and 14 (CN). The initial combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle; however, due to 2 out of 6 dose-limiting haematological toxicities at the first dose level, a reduced dose-intense schedule was assessed. The RP2D was defined at 1.0 mg m⁻² eribulin and 1000 mg m⁻² gemcitabine day 1 and 8 q3 weeks. No other significant toxicities were observed in the G expansion cohort. Neutropenia prevented further dose escalation in the CN cohort. Objective responses were seen in all three cohorts – 2/21 (CP), 1/10 (G) and 2/14 (CN).

Conclusions:

The combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was well tolerated at the RP2D.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells using regimen combining docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells by combining docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF) in breast cancer patients.Methods:A total of 57 breast cancer patients were treated with docetaxel 120 mg/m2.When the white blood cell(WBC) count decreased to 1.0×109/L,patients were given G-CSF 5-g/kg daily by subcutaneous injection until the end of apheresis.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells(MNC) were isolated by Cobe Spectra Apheresis System.The percentage of CD34+ cell was assayed by flow cytometry.Results:At a median 6 of days(range 3-8) after the administration of docetaxel,the median WBC count decreased to 1.08×109/L(range 0.20-2.31).The median duration of G-CSF mobilization was 3 days(range 2-7).The MNC collection was conducted 8-12 days(median 10 days) after docetaxel treatment.The median MNC was 5.35×108/kg(range 0.59-14.07),the median CD34+ cell count was 2.43×106/kg(range 0.16-16.69).The CD34+ cell count was higher than 1.00×106/kg in 47 of 57 cases(82.46%) and higher than 2.00×106/kg in 36 cases(63.16%).The CD34+ cell count was higher than 2.00×106/kg in 27 collections(23.68%).The MNC count and the CD34+ cell count were correlated with the bottom of WBC after docetaxel chemotherapy(r=0.364,0.502,P=0.005,0.000).The CD34+ cell count was correlated with the MNC count(r=0.597,P=0.000).The mobilization and apheresis were well tolerated in all patients.Mild perioral numbness and numbness of hand or feet were observed in 3 cases.No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion:Mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell by combining docetaxel with G-CSF was effective and safety in breast cancer patients.     

A dose-escalation study of indisulam in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with solid tumours

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the recommended dose of the multi-targeted cell cycle inhibitor indisulam in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumours and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Thirty-five patients were treated with indisulam on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Capecitabine was administered two times daily (BID) on days 1-14. Plasma concentrations of indisulam, capecitabine and its three metabolites were determined for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Hand/foot syndrome and stomatitis were the major non-haematological toxicities. The recommended dose was initially established at indisulam 700 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID. However, during cycle 2 the recommended dose was poorly tolerated in three patients. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID proved to be safe at cycle 1 and 2 in nine additional patients. Indisulam pharmacokinetics during cycle 1 were consistent with pharmacokinetic data from phase I mono-therapy studies. However, exposure to indisulam was remarkably increased at cycle 2 due to a drug-drug interaction between capecitabine and indisulam. Partial response was confirmed in two patients, one with colon carcinoma and the other with pancreatic carcinoma. Seventeen patients had stable disease. Indisulam (700 mg m(-2)) in combination with capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) BID) was well tolerated during the first cycle. A dose of indisulam 500 mg m(-2) and capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) BID was considered safe in multiple treatment cycles. The higher incidence of toxicities observed during cycle 2 can be explained by a time-dependent pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction.