Topiramate therapeutic monitoring in patients with epilepsy: effect of concomitant antiepileptic drugs

The authors assessed the effect of concomitant antiepileptic therapy on steady-state plasma concentrations of the new antiepileptic drug (AED) topiramate and the potential relation between topiramate plasma levels and side effects in a cohort of 116 patients with epilepsy. On the basis of concomitant AEDs, patients were divided into two subgroups, otherwise comparable for age and weight-adjusted daily dose of topiramate. Group A (n = 73) received topiramate plus AED inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism, such as carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin. Group B (n = 43) received topiramate plus AEDs without inducing properties of CYP metabolism (namely valproic acid and lamotrigine). Weight-normalized topiramate clearance values, calculated as dosing rate/steady-state plasma drug concentration, were about 1.5-fold in patients receiving AED inducers compared with patients receiving AED noninducers. Topiramate plasma concentrations were linearly related to daily drug doses, regardless of concomitant AED therapy, over a dose range from 25 to 800 mg/d, although, at a given daily dose, a large interpatient variability was observed in matched plasma drug concentrations within each group of patients. Thirty-nine patients (34%) reported side effects associated with topiramate, mostly central nervous system effects. No consistent relation was observed between topiramate plasma concentrations and adverse effects, either in the cohort of patients as a whole or within each subgroup. From a clinical point of view, patients receiving concurrent treatment with enzyme-inducing AEDs can show twofold lower topiramate plasma concentrations compared with patients receiving valproic acid or lamotrigine, and appropriate topiramate dosage adjustments may be required when concomitant AED inducers are either added or withdrawn. Due to the observed variability in topiramate metabolic variables and the complex spectrum of possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with the most commonly coprescribed AEDs, monitoring of plasma topiramate concentrations may help the physician in the pharmacokinetic optimization of the drug dosage schedule in individual patients.     

Effect of felbamate on clobazam and its metabolite kinetics in patients with epilepsy

The authors report preliminary findings on the effect of the new generation antiepileptic drug (AED) felbamate (FBM) on steady state plasma concentrations of clobazam (CLB), a benzodiazepine (frequently used as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy) and its active metabolite n-desmethyl-clobazam (N-CLB). The authors prospectively collected plasma samples from 66 children and adults with epilepsy receiving chronic CLB therapy. On the basis of concomitant AEDs, patients were divided into three subgroups otherwise comparable for age and weight-adjusted daily dose of CLB: group A (n = 22), receiving CLB monotherapy or CLB plus AEDs without inducing properties of cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism, namely valproic acid (VPA) or lamotrigine (LTG); group B (n = 28), receiving CLB plus AED inducer polytherapy (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin), even associated with VPA (n = 9) or LTG (n = 12); group C (n = 16), receiving CLB plus FBM, associated with AED inducers, VPA or LTG. Level to weight-adjusted dose ratio (L/D) of CLB in groups B and C was twofold lower compared to group A (p < 0.001). L/D of N-CLB was twofold higher in group B and fivefold in group C compared to group A (p < 0.00 1). The metabolite-to-parent drug ratio shifted from a median value of 2.8 in group A to 13 in group B, and up to 29 in patients receiving polytherapy with FBM (p < 0.001). These data confirm previous reports of a significant increase in CLB clearance in patients receiving AED inducers, leading to an accumulation of its main metabolite. They also provide novel evidence of a further marked increase in N-CLB plasma concentrations in patients receiving FBM cotherapy. From a clinical point of view, this finding should be kept in mind in explaining possible toxicity in patients on complex AED polytherapy. Furthermore, knowledge of the in vivo interaction between CLB and FBM could help in identifying the CYP isoforms involved in the metabolism of both CLB and N-CLB.     

Retrospective population pharmacokinetic analysis of levetiracetam in children and adolescents with epilepsy: dosing recommendations

OBJECTIVE: To characterize levetiracetam pharmacokinetics, identify significant covariate relationships and identify doses in children that achieve blood concentrations similar to those observed in adults. METHODS: Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling was used to analyse pooled data collected from 228 children with epilepsy aged 3 months to 18 years in five trials of adjunctive levetiracetam therapy. Simulations were used to identify dosing regimens achieving levetiracetam steady-state peak and trough plasma concentrations similar to those attained in adults receiving the recommended starting dose for adjunctive therapy (500 mg twice daily). The covariates considered for inclusion in the base model were age, bodyweight, gender, race, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), levetiracetam dose, concomitant antiepileptic drug (AED) by category (neutral, enzyme inducer, inhibitor, combination of inducer and inhibitor), and benzodiazepines. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best characterized the data. The following significant covariates were identified: (i) age on the absorption rate constant (k(a)); (ii) bodyweight, dose, CL(CR) and concomitant enzyme-inducing AED on plasma oral clearance (CL/F); and (iii) bodyweight on the apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (V(d)/F). The main explanatory covariates were age on k(a), bodyweight on CL/F and V(d)/F, and enzyme-inducing AED on CL/F, of which bodyweight was the most influential covariate. Dosing can be carried out with either 10 mg/kg of oral solution twice daily in children weighing <50 kg and a 500-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing >50 kg or, when patients favour a solid formulation, 10 mg/kg of oral solution twice daily in children weighing <20 kg, a 250-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing 20-40 kg, and a 500-mg tablet twice daily in those weighing >40 kg. All of these doses achieved steady-state peak and trough plasma concentrations similar to those observed in adults following the recommended starting dose for adjunctive therapy (500 mg twice daily). CONCLUSIONS: The most influential covariate of levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in children is bodyweight. A starting dose of levetiracetam 10 mg/kg twice daily ensures the same exposure in children as does 500 mg twice daily in adults.     

Influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs on plasma lamotrigine concentration in adult Japanese epilepsy patients

Lamotrigine (LTG) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that was approved in Japan in 2008. We evaluated the influence of AEDs that induce hepatic enzymes (including phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), carbamazepine (CBZ)), valproic acid (VPA), and various combinations of these drugs, on plasma LTG concentration in adult Japanese epilepsy patients. A total of 621 patients (mean age 34.4±11.8 years) were evaluated retrospectively. We calculated the concentration to dose ratio (CD ratio) for LTG with different AED regimens, and employed multiple regression analysis to determine factors influencing the LTG concentration. There was a linear correlation between the dose and concentration of LTG in patients treated with LTG (group I), LTG+VPA (group II), LTG+inducers (group III), or LTG+VPA+inducers (group IV). The mean CD ratio of patients on LTG monotherapy was 1.43±0.4 (μg/mL)/(mg/kg). When LTG was combined with VPA, the CD ratio increased about 2.2-fold, but there was no significant correlation between the CD ratio and VPA concentration. The mean CD ratios calculated in patients receiving LTG+PHT, LTG+PB, and LTG+CBZ were 0.56, 0.84, and 0.91, respectively. Addition of PHT significantly reduced the CD ratio in a concentration-dependent manner, in comparison with PB and CBZ (p<0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the coefficient of determination of groups I, II, III, and IV were 0.94, 0.94, 0.90, and 0.91, respectively. In the clinical setting, these findings can help to estimate LTG concentrations and predict the inducing or inhibiting effects of concomitant AEDs.     

Influence of dosage, age, and co-medication on plasma topiramate concentrations in children and adults with severe epilepsy and preliminary observations on correlations with clinical response

The influence of dosage, age, and co-medication on plasma topiramate (TPM) concentrations at steady state was investigated in 51 patients aged 3 to 30 years. All patients had chronic active epilepsy, and most were receiving concomitant medication with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (carbamazepine and phenobarbital). Plasma TPM concentrations were determined by a specific immunoassay in samples obtained before the morning dose. Thirty-five patients could be evaluated prospectively at different dose levels, and the relationship between plasma TPM concentration and dosage was linear over the assessed dose range (1.8 to 10.0 mg/kg) both in adults and in children. The influence of age on pharmacokinetic parameters could be assessed only for the 42 patients co-medicated with enzyme inducers. In these patients dose-normalized plasma TPM concentrations correlated positively with age (r = 0.59, P < 0.0001), where apparent oral clearance values (CL/F) were inversely related to age (r = 0.73, P < 0.0001). In particular, CL/F values in children aged less than 10 years (112 +/- 82 mL/kg/h, mean +/- SD, n = 14) were almost three times as high as those observed in patients aged >15 to 30 years (42 +/- 16 mL/kg/h, n = 17), whereas the CL/F value in children aged 10 to 15 years (66 +/- 22 mL/kg/h, n = 11) was intermediate between those found in the two other age groups. Patients not receiving enzyme-inducing AEDs showed lower CL/F values than did age- and gender-matched patients on enzyme-inducing co-medication. A preliminary evaluation of the relationship between plasma TPM concentration and therapeutic response could be made in 41 patients. No significant difference in drug concentration was detected between patients showing a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline (5.9 +/- 2.2 micrograms/mL, n = 30) and those having no clinical improvement (5.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/mL, n = 11). Likewise, there was no consistent relationship between plasma TPM concentration and appearance of adverse effects. These results indicate that plasma TPM concentrations are linearly related to dosage both in adults and in children and that children aged <10 years require much greater body weight-adjusted dosage to achieve drug levels comparable to those observed in young adults. The marked increase in TPM clearance caused by enzyme-inducing co-medication was confirmed.     

Saliva and serum levetiracetam concentrations in patients with epilepsy

Although antiepileptic drug (AED) monitoring in saliva may have some clinical applicability, it has not yet come into routine use. The correlation between levetiracetam (LEV) saliva and serum concentrations also remains unclear. To confirm LEV saliva assay as a useful, noninvasive alternative to serum measurement, we investigated the possible correlation between saliva and serum LEV concentrations. Samples of saliva and blood were collected from 30 patients with epilepsy receiving chronic therapy with LEV as monotherapy or add-on therapy, and LEV concentrations were assayed in saliva and serum. Linear regression analyses showed a close correlation between saliva and serum LEV concentrations (r2 = 0.90; P < 0.001). LEV blood and saliva concentrations were linearly related to daily drug doses (r2 = 0.78 and 0.70; P < 0.01). When data were analyzed for subgroups (patients receiving LEV in monotherapy, as add-on therapy with enzyme-inducer AEDs, and as add-on therapy with noninducer or moderate-inducer AEDs), no significant difference was found between saliva and serum LEV concentrations among groups. These preliminary results indicate that LEV, like other AEDs, can be measured in saliva as an alternative to blood-based assays. Saliva LEV collection and assay is a valid noninvasive, more convenient alternative to serum measurement.     

妊娠期癫痫患者左乙拉西坦药动学行为变化

目的：系统研究左乙拉西坦（levetiracetam,LEV）在妊娠期癫痫患者体内药动学行为变化,并探究基于LEV血药浓度监测,调整妊娠期癫痫患者的给药方案。方法：回顾性收集2017年1月至2021年7月于中国医科大学附属盛京医院就诊并进行LEV血药浓度监测的妊娠期癫痫患者的临床病历资料,计算孕前至产后LEV的表观清除率（CL）,分析妊娠期癫痫患者LEV的给药方案,并探究妊娠期合并用药对LEV体内药动学行为的影响。结果：对17例单用LEV治疗的妊娠期癫痫患者138次血药浓度监测数据的回顾性分析表明,妊娠期LEV的CL显著增加,与孕前基线相比,在妊娠早期、中期及晚期分别增加了86.39%（P<0.01）、148.30%（P<0.01）和134.69%（P<0.01）,分娩后迅速下降,于产后6周左右恢复至孕前水平。不同妊娠时期LEV给药剂量存在差异,妊娠中、晚期给药剂量较孕前分别增加了44.93%（P<0.01）和96.07%（P<0.01）。妊娠期合用具酶诱导作用的抗癫痫药能够诱导LEV代谢,使LEV的CL增加。结论：妊娠期癫痫患者LEV体内药动学行为变化显著,其CL于妊娠中期达到峰值,分娩后迅速降低。与具酶诱导作用的抗癫痫药合用会增加LEV的CL。定期监测LEV血药浓度可为妊娠期癫痫患者的药物治疗管理提供指导。     

Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array ultraviolet detection: preliminary observations on correlation between plasma concentration and clinical response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Levetiracetam is a new antiepileptic drug prescribed for the treatment of patients with refractory partial seizures with or without secondary generalization as well as for the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. A rapid and specific method by high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detection was developed to measure the concentration of levetiracetam in human plasma. The trough plasma concentrations measured in 69 epileptic patients treated with 500 to 3000 mg/d of levetiracetam ranged from 1.1 to 33.5 microg/mL. The mean (range) levetiracetam plasma concentrations in responders and nonresponders were 12.9 microg/mL (4.6-21 microg/mL) and 9.5 microg/mL (1.1-20.9 microg/mL), respectively. A wide variability in concentration-response relationships was observed in patients. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, the threshold levetiracetam concentration for a therapeutic response was 11 microg/mL. The sensitivity and specificity for this threshold levetiracetam concentration were 73% and 71%, respectively. According to chi analysis, this finding was not significant probably because of the small number of patients and because of their refractory seizure type. Nevertheless, the levetiracetam plasma concentration could be used to help clinicians detect severe intoxication or to verify compliance by repeating the measurement in patients.     

Drug‐resistant epilepsy and topiramate: Plasma concentration and frequency of epileptic seizures

Topiramate (TPM) is a second‐generation antiepileptic drug (AED), acting on drug‐resistant epilepsy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of the dose, use of other AEDs on TPM plasma concentration (C_p), and frequency of epileptic seizures. A cross‐sectional analytical study was developed with patients aged 18‐60 years, for diagnosis of drug‐resistant epilepsy, using TPM in monotherapy or associated with other AEDs. The following variables were analyzed: age, frequency of epileptic seizures, pharmacotherapeutic regimen with its respective doses, adherence to medication treatment, and adverse events score. Thirty‐seven patients were included, 83.8% of the patients presented C_p below the therapeutic range. Multiple linear regression estimated that the increase of 1.0 mg/kg/d promoted an increase of 0.68 μg/mL in TPMC_p, while the use of inducers predicted a reduction of 2.97 μg/mL (P < .001). Multiple Poisson regression predicts that an increase of 1.0 μg/mL in TPMC_p decreased the patient's chance of presenting seizures, and patients using AED inducers were about ten times more likely to present seizures than those who do not use (P < .001). In addition, for patients using AED inducers with C_p below the therapeutic range, the mean number of seizures per month was greater than those with C_p within the therapeutic range. The prescribed dose and the use of AED inducers influence C_p of TPM, likewise the low C_p of first‐line AEDs and of the adjuvant in the treatment, TPM, as well as low TPM dose seem to affect the control of epileptic seizures.     

Harnessing the clinical potential of antiepileptic drug therapy: dosage optimisation

For patients with epilepsy, effective seizure control is the most important determinant of good quality of life. To achieve this, antiepileptic drug (AED) dosages should be individualised to maximise therapeutic benefit and to avoid most--if not all--adverse effects. Several studies suggest that, in routine clinical practice, dosage individualisation is often suboptimal. This may lead to patients receiving unnecessarily large dosages. Conversely, it may lead to patients switching to an alternative therapy (when clinical response is deemed insufficient), without exploration of the full dosage range. Indeed, dosage optimisation--which should involve consideration of the treatment setting and individual patient characteristics--can be a complicated process requiring skill and patience. In general neurological practice, most AEDs should be started at a low dosage and gradually titrated upwards. Starting dosages are similar in most types of epilepsy; however, if a rapid onset of therapeutic action is required, phenytoin, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), levetiracetam and gabapentin are probably the best tolerated AEDs for starting at full dosage. The initial target maintenance dosage of an AED should be based on the dose-response profile of the drug, and on specific patient characteristics. Usually, the lowest effective daily dose expected to provide seizure control should be used, although various factors (e.g. stage and severity of epilepsy, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, attitude of the patient) will markedly influence dosage selection. If seizures are not controlled on the initial target dose, the dosage should be increased gradually until complete seizure control is achieved or intolerable adverse effects occur. In most patients who fail to respond to the initially prescribed drug, switching to another AED (monotherapy) is the best option. Combination therapy may be appropriate for patients unresponsive to 2 or more sequential monotherapies. Therapeutic drug monitoring (measurement of serum drug concentrations) is useful in various settings, such as when drug interactions are expected, toxicity is suspected, or when AEDs with nonlinear pharmacokinetics (e.g. phenytoin, carbamazepine) are used. No indications currently exist for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer AEDs. In summary, dosage regimens of AEDs should be assessed regularly, and adjusted if necessary, so that patients can derive optimal therapeutic benefit. For patients considered 'difficult to treat' (i.e. those in whom seizures remain incompletely controlled after several attempts at treatment), referral to a specialist is recommended.     

Topiramate pharmacokinetics in children and adults with epilepsy: a case-matched comparison based on therapeutic drug monitoring data

OBJECTIVE: To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate in a large population of children and adults with epilepsy in a therapeutic drug monitoring setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, case-matched pharmacokinetic evaluation. PATIENTS: Seventy children (aged 1-17 years) with epilepsy and 70 adult controls (aged 18-65 years) with epilepsy, matched for sex and comedication. METHODS: Topiramate apparent oral clearance (CL/F) values were calculated from steady-state serum concentrations in children and compared with those determined in controls. Comparisons were made by means of the Mann-Whitney's U-test, or the Kruskal-Wallis test in the case of multiple comparisons. A linear regression model was used to assess potential correlation of CL/F values with age. To investigate the influence of different variables on the variability in topiramate CL/F values, a multiple regression model was developed. RESULTS: In the absence of enzyme-inducing comedication, mean topiramate CL/F was 42% higher in children than in adults (40.3 +/- 21.0 vs 28.4 +/- 15.3 mL/h/kg; p < 0.01). In children and adults comedicated with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), topiramate CL/F values were approximately 1.5- to 2-fold higher than those observed in the absence of enzyme inducers, and the elevation in topiramate CL/F in children compared with adults was also present in the subgroups receiving enzyme inducers (66%; 76.6 +/- 35.1 vs 46.1 +/- 16.7 mL/h/kg; p < 0.0001). In the paediatric population, a negative correlation between CL/F and age was demonstrated, both in the absence (p < 0.01) and in the presence (p < 0.001) of enzyme induction. The independent influence of age and enzyme-inducing AEDs on topiramate CL/F was confirmed by multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Topiramate CL/F is highest in young children and decreases progressively with age until puberty, presumably due to age-dependent changes in the rate of drug metabolism. As a result of this, younger patients require higher dosages to achieve serum topiramate concentrations comparable with those found in older children and adults. Enzyme-inducing comedication decreases serum topiramate concentration by approximately one-half and one-third in children and adults, respectively.     

Levetiracetam: a review of its use in epilepsy

Levetiracetam (Keppra?, E Keppra?) is an established second-generation antiepileptic drug (AED). Worldwide, levetiracetam is most commonly approved as adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization; other approved indications include monotherapy treatment of partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, and adjunctive treatment of myoclonic seizures associated with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Levetiracetam has a novel structure and unique mechanisms of action. Unlike other AEDs, the mechanisms of action of levetiracetam appear to involve neuronal binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A, inhibiting calcium release from intraneuronal stores, opposing the activity of negative modulators of GABA- and glycin-gated currents and inhibiting excessive synchronized activity between neurons. In addition, levetiracetam inhibits N-type calcium channels. Levetiracetam is associated with rapid and complete absorption, high oral bioavailability, minimal metabolism that consists of hydrolysis of the acetamide group, and primarily renal elimination. It lacks cytochrome P450 isoenzyme-inducing potential and is not associated with clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, including other AEDs. The efficacy of oral immediate-release levetiracetam in controlling seizures has been established in numerous randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trials in patients with epilepsy. Adjunctive levetiracetam reduced the frequency of seizures in paediatric and adult patients with refractory partial onset seizures to a significantly greater extent than placebo. Monotherapy with levetiracetam was noninferior to that with carbamazepine controlled release in controlling seizures in patients with newly diagnosed partial onset seizures. Levetiracetam also provided seizure control relative to placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy with myoclonic seizures or GTC seizures. In addition, patients receiving oral levetiracetam showed improvements in measures of health-related quality of life relative to those receiving placebo. Although treatment-emergent adverse events were commonly reported in the clinical trials of levetiracetam, the overall proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was broadly similar in the levetiracetam and placebo treatment groups, with most events being mild to moderate in severity. Levetiracetam is not associated with cognitive impairment or drug-induced weight gain, but has been associated with behavioural adverse effects in some patients.     

Spotlight on levetiracetam in epilepsy

Levetiracetam (Keppra?, E Keppra?) is an established second-generation antiepileptic drug (AED). Worldwide, levetiracetam is most commonly approved as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization; other approved indications include monotherapy treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, and adjunctive treatment of myoclonic seizures associated with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizures associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Levetiracetam has a novel structure and unique mechanisms of action. Unlike other AEDs, the mechanisms of action of levetiracetam appear to involve neuronal binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A, inhibiting calcium release from intraneuronal stores, opposing the activity of negative modulators of GABA- and glycin-gated currents and inhibiting excessive synchronized activity between neurons. In addition, levetiracetam inhibits N-type calcium channels. Levetiracetam is associated with rapid and complete absorption, high oral bioavailability, minimal metabolism that consists of hydrolysis of the acetamide group and primarily renal elimination. It lacks cytochrome P450 isoenzyme-inducing potential and is not associated with clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, including other AEDs. The efficacy of oral immediate-release levetiracetam in controlling seizures has been established in numerous randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trials in patients with epilepsy. Adjunctive levetiracetam reduced the frequency of seizures in paediatric and adult patients with refractory partial-onset seizures to a significantly greater extent than placebo. Monotherapy with levetiracetam was noninferior to that with carbamazepine controlled release in controlling seizures in patients with newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures. Levetiracetam also provided seizure control relative to placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy with myoclonic seizures or GTC seizures. In addition, patients receiving oral levetiracetam showed improvements in measures of health-related quality of life relative to those receiving placebo. Although treatment-emergent adverse events were commonly reported in the clinical trials of levetiracetam, the overall proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was broadly similar in the levetiracetam and placebo treatment groups, with most events being mild to moderate in severity. Levetiracetam is not associated with cognitive impairment or drug-induced weight gain, but has been associated with behavioural adverse effects in some patients.     

A Cross‐Sectional Study to Assess the Modulation of Wnt Inhibitors following Anti‐Epileptic Drug Therapy and their Correlation with Vitamin D and Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor κ B Ligand in Indian Women with Epilepsy

Long‐term anti‐epileptic drug (AED) therapy compromises bone health. Although vitamin D deficiency is proposed to be involved, it alone is not held responsible. This accounts for investigating other mechanisms in bone accrual. Recent studies have shown modulation of inhibitors of wnt pathway, sclerostin and dickkopf‐1 (DKK‐1), in glucocorticoids‐induced osteoporosis. We investigated whether AED monotherapy modulates wnt inhibitors in Indian women with epilepsy. Women of age > 20–40 years with the diagnosis of epilepsy and receiving AEDs (carbamazepine, valproate and levetiracetam) for at least a year were enrolled. The results were compared with age‐matched healthy controls with no evidence of metabolic bone disease. Women undergoing treatment with AEDs (mean duration: 50.59 ± 37.929 months) exhibited higher serum sclerostin and receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL) and lower vitamin D (25‐hydroxy vitamin D) and DKK‐1 levels when compared to age‐matched healthy controls. Sclerostin showed a positive correlation with RANKL, while DKK‐1 presented no such relationship. However, no association was evident after adjusting for age, duration of treatment and total daily dose. Although a correlation between wnt inhibitors and RANKL could not be obtained, AEDs displayed changes in serum levels of wnt inhibitors in persons with epilepsy and hence these drugs may compromise bone health through a disturbance in wnt signalling mechanisms.     

Pharmacokinetics of efavirenz when co-administered with rifampin in TB/HIV co-infected patients: pharmacogenetic effect of CYP2B6 variation

The goal of this study was to determine the effect of CYP2B6 genetic variation on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of efavirenz (600 mg/d) in TB/HIV co-infected patients receiving concomitant rifampin, a potent CYP inducer. In the 26 patients studied, CYP2B6 c.516GG, GT, and TT genotype frequencies were 0.27, 0.50, and 0.23, respectively. Mean plasma efavirenz area under the curve was significantly higher in patients with CYP2B6 c.516TT than in those with GT (107 vs 27.6 microg x h/mL, P< .0001) or GG genotype (107 vs 23.0 microg x h/mL, P< .0001). Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) was significantly lower in patients with CYP2B6 c.516TT than in those with GT genotype (2.1 vs 8.4 mL/min/kg, P<0.0001) and GG genotype (2.1 vs 9.9 mL/min/kg, P< .0001). No differences in efavirenz exposure or CL/F existed between patients with CYP2B6 c.516GT and GG genotypes. Our results indicate that CYP2B6 c.516TT genotype can be used to identify efavirenz poor metabolizers in patients co-treated with rifampin.     

Population Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam in Japanese and Western Adults

OBJECTIVE: To assess the population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam, a second-generation antiepileptic drug, in adult Japanese and Western populations. METHODS: Data were pooled from ten matched clinical trials conducted in Japan and in Europe and the USA, in which levetiracetam was administered orally to healthy subjects and subjects with epilepsy. Overall, 5408 plasma concentrations were available from 524 subjects in six clinical pharmacology studies and two confirmatory and two long-term safety studies of add-on treatment for partial epilepsy. A one-compartment open model with first-order absorption and elimination was fitted to the plasma concentrations using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling with first-order estimation. RESULTS: Ethnicity had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in the presence of the other covariates. Bodyweight, sex, creatinine clearance and concomitant intake of enzyme inducers or valproic acid had a statistically significant effect on apparent plasma clearance of levetiracetam. Bodyweight, disease and valproic acid had a statistically significant effect on the volume of distribution. Levetiracetam exposure (the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 12-hour dosing interval at steady state) was 12% higher in females than in males. Decreasing bodyweight from 70 kg to 40 kg was predicted to increase exposure by 16%, while halving creatinine clearance was predicted to increase exposure by 10%. Enzyme inducers reduced exposure by 8%, while valproic acid resulted in a 23% increase in exposure. The latter effect was assumed to arise from the known association between valproic acid and increased body fat, since levetiracetam is negligibly metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: Population pharmacokinetic analysis points to the absence of ethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam between Japanese and Western populations, other than those arising from bodyweight differences. Small, clinically non-relevant differences between individual demographic characteristics suggest that dose adjustment is usually not necessary.     

Topiramate serum concentration-to-dose ratio: influence of age and concomitant antiepileptic drugs and monitoring implications

The influence of age and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the trough steady-state serum concentration of topiramate, normalized to 1 mg/kg body weight or concentration-to-dose ratio (TPM-CDR), was assessed using multivariate methods in samples from 94 epileptic patients (38 under 11 years and 56 over 11 years of age), most of whom were outpatients receiving either just TPM (n = 20) or TPM in combination with other AEDs (n = 74). Analysis of the covariance showed that the age of the patients was influential (P < 0.001) and also showed a difference in TPM-CDR between the non-inducers group (TPM or TPM + lamotrigine or valproate) and the inducers group (TPM + carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin) (P < 0.001). The TPM-CDR was 0.4 +/- 0.1 in patients under 11 years with inducers (n = 7), 0.8 +/- 0.3 in patients over 11 years with inducers (n = 32), 1.1 +/- 0.4 in patients under 11 years with noninducers (n = 30), and 1.8 +/- 0.6 in patients over 11 years with noninducers (n = 21). A two-way analysis of the variance showed differences between patients under 11 years and those over 11 years (P < 0.001), and between the noninducers and inducers groups (P < 0.001). TPM-CDR was nearly 50% lower in patients under 11 years than in patients over 11 years, and in patients with TPM + inducers than in patients with TPM or TPM + noninducers, in both children and adults. To achieve the same serum concentration of TPM, children will need double the daily dose per kilogram of TPM required by adults, and both children and adults taking enzyme-inducing AEDs will require double the dose needed by those who do not take them.     

Effects of smoking, CYP2D6 genotype, and concomitant drug intake on the steady state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol in schizophrenic inpatients.

The effects of smoking, CYP2D6 genotype, and concomitant use of enzyme inducers or inhibitors on the steady state plasma concentrations of haloperidol (HAL) and reduced haloperidol (RHAL) were evaluated in 92 schizophrenic inpatients. All but three of these patients received concomitant medication, in many cases with drugs potentially interacting with HAL. Of the 92 patients, 63 were treated orally with HAL in a daily dose of 0.4 to 50 mg; 29 patients were treated intramuscularly with a daily equivalent dose of HAL decanoate (expressed as HAL) of 1.8 to 17.9 mg. A wide interindividual variation in HAL dose and in steady state plasma concentrations of HAL and RHAL was observed. In the patients treated orally, the daily oral dose was about 4 times higher and the dose-normalized HAL (but not RHAL) plasma concentrations were significantly lower in smokers (n = 40) than in nonsmokers (n = 23) (p < 0.01). The dose-normalized RHAL (but not HAL) plasma concentrations and the RHAL/HAL ratio were significantly higher in poor metabolizers (PMs) than in extensive metabolizers (EMs). There was a trend toward an effect of potentially interacting drugs (inducers or inhibitors) on dose, dose-normalized HAL and RHAL plasma concentrations, and the RHAL/HAL ratio. In the patients treated intramuscularly, the dose-normalized HAL (but not RHAL) plasma concentrations were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers, but no differences in doses were observed. This naturalistic study of modest sample size in a polymedicated population shows an effect of smoking and CYP2D6 genotype (and to a lesser extent, of interacting drugs) on the kinetics of HAL.     

Plasma gabapentin concentrations in children with epilepsy: influence of age,relationship with dosage,and preliminary observations on correlation with clinical response

The influence of age and administered daily dosage on the plasma concentrations of gabapentin (GBP) at steady state was evaluated in a group of 41 children and young adults (aged 3-30 years) receiving long-term adjunctive treatment with GBP for the management of refractory partial-onset seizures. For each patient, peak and trough concentrations were determined by a specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method in samples obtained before the morning dose and 2.5 hours later, respectively. To assess within-subject relationship between plasma concentration and dosage, 30 patients were evaluated at more than one dosage level. Within the assessed dose range, plasma GBP concentrations were linearly related to dose. Apparent oral clearance values (mean +/- SD) in children aged 6 years or less (4.8 +/- 0.9 mL/kg/min) were comparable with those observed in children aged 7 to 15 years (4.6 + 1.5 mL/kg/min) and moderately higher than those found in young adults (3.9 + 0.9 mL/kg/min), even though differences among groups failed to reach statistical significance. There was, however, a significant difference in CL/F between children aged 10 years or less and older children (5.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.2 mL/kg/min, P < 0.005). Of the 41 patients who entered the study, 22 discontinued treatment, mostly due to insufficient efficacy. No significant difference in plasma GBP concentration was detected between patients showing a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency (4.1 +/- 1.9 microg/mL, n = 11, mean +/- SD) and those having no significant clinical improvement (4.4 +/- 1.7 microg/mL, n = 30). These results indicate that in children given dosages up to 50 mg/kg/d (mean, 25 mg/kg/d), GBP pharmacokinetic analyses show no important deviation from linearity. The data also suggest that, on average, children may need moderately higher dosages to reach plasma GBP concentrations comparable with those found in adults. There seems to be a large variation in the plasma concentrations of the drug associated with a favorable therapeutic response.     

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception

An interaction between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the combined oral contraceptive pill was first proposed when the dose of estradiol in the oral contraceptive pill was reduced from 100 to 50 microg. There was a higher incidence of breakthrough bleeding and contraceptive failure among women with epilepsy compared with women in general. Since then, interaction studies have been undertaken to look for possible interactions between AEDs and the combined oral contraceptive pill. Phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, felbamate and topiramate have been shown to increase the metabolism of ethinylestradiol and progestogens. Therefore, if a women is on one of the AEDs and wishes to take the oral contraceptive pill, she will need to take a preparation containing at least 50 microg of ethinylestradiol. Levonorgestrel implants are contraindicated in women receiving these AEDs because of cases of contraceptive failure. It is recommended that medroxyprogesterone injections be given every 10 rather than 12 weeks to women who are receiving AEDs that induce hepatic microsomal enzymes. There are no interactions between the combined oral contraceptive pill, progesterone-only pill, medroxyprogesterone injections or levonorgestrel implants and the AEDs valproic acid (sodium valproate), vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, tiagabine, levetiracetam, zonisamide, ethosuximide and the benzodiazepines. Therefore, normal dose contraceptive preparations can be used in patients receiving these AEDs.