Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Background: Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure.

Methods: Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanil's effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge.

Results: Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure.     

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Volunteer Subjects with Severe Liver Disease

Background: Remifentanil, a new micro-opioid agonist with an extremely short duration of action, is metabolized by circulating and tissue esterases; therefore, its clearance should be relatively unaffected by changes in hepatic or renal function. This study was designed to determine whether severe hepatic disease affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil.

Methods: Ten volunteers with chronic, stable, severe hepatic disease and awaiting liver transplantation and ten matched controls were enrolled. Each subject was given a 4-h infusion of remifentanil. The first five pairs received 0.0125 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 3 h; the second five pairs received double these infusion rates. During and after the infusion, arterial blood was obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses, and the ventilatory response to a hypercarbic challenge was assessed. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed. The pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment intravenous infusion model, and ventilatory depression was modelled using the inhibitory Emax model. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolite GR90291 were determined using noncompartmental methods.

Results: There were no differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil or GR90291 between the two groups. The subjects with liver disease were more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil. The EC50 values (the remifentanil concentrations determined from simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses to depress carbon dioxide-stimulated minute ventilation by 50%) in the control and hepatic disease groups were 2.52 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 2.07-2.97 ng/ml) and 1.56 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 1.37-1.76 ng/ml), respectively.     

Cerebral Blood Flow and CO2 Reactivity Is Similar during Remifentanil/N2 O and Fentanyl/N2 O Anesthesia

Background: Remifentanil, a rapidly metabolized [micro sign]-opioid agonist, may offer advantages for neurosurgical procedures in which prolonged anesthetic effects can delay assessment of the patient. This study compared the effects of remifentanil-nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and carbon dioxide reactivity with those of fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia during craniotomy.

Methods: After institutional approval and informed patient consent were obtained, 23 patients scheduled to undergo supratentorial tumor surgery were randomly assigned to remifentanil or fentanyl infusion groups in a double-blinded manner. Midazolam, thiopental, and pancuronium induction was followed by equipotent narcotic loading infusions of remifentanil (1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or fentanyl (2 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) for 5-10 min. Patients were ventilated with 2:1 nitrous oxide-oxygen, and opioid rates were reduced and then titrated to a stable hemodynamic effect. After dural exposure, CBF was measured by the intravenous133 xenon technique at normocapnia and hypocapnia. Reactivity of CBF to carbon dioxide was calculated as the absolute increase in CBF per millimeters of mercury increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, unpaired Student's t tests, or contingency analysis.

Results: In the remifentanil group (n = 10), CBF decreased from 36 +/- 11 to 27 +/- 8 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 33 +/- 5 to 25 +/- 2 mmHg. In the fentanyl group (n = 8), CBF decreased from 37 +/- 11 to 25 +/- 6 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 34 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 3 mmHg. Absolute carbon dioxide reactivity was preserved with both agents: 1 +/- 1.2 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for remifentanil and 1.5 +/- 0.5 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for fentanyl (P = 0.318).     

Intravenous Remifentanil: Placental Transfer, Maternal and Neonatal Effects

Background: Remifentanil has not been studied in obstetric patients. This study evaluates the placental transfer of remifentanil and the neonatal effects when administered as an intravenous infusion.

Methods: Nineteen parturients underwent nonemergent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia and received 0.1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil intravenously, which was continued until skin closure. Maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood samples were obtained at delivery for analysis of drug concentrations of remifentanil, its metabolite, and blood gases. Maternal vital signs were monitored continuously, and pain and sedation levels were assessed intermittently. Apgar scores were obtained at 1, 5, 10, and 20 min, and Neonatal and Adaptive Capacity Scores were noted 30 and 60 min after delivery. Parturients and newborns were observed for at least 24 h after surgery for side effects.

Results: The means and SDs of UV:MA and UA:UV ratios for remifentanil were 0.88 +/- 0.78 and 0.29 +/- 0.07, respectively. Mean clearance was 93 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1. The mean UV:MA and UA:MV ratios for remifentanil acid were 0.56 +/- 0.29 and 1.23 +/- 0.89, respectively. The mean MA (remifentanil acid):MA (remifentanil) ratio was 2.92 +/- 3.65. There were no adverse effects on the neonates, but there was a sedative effect and respiratory depressant effect on the mothers.     

Comparison of Adenosine and Remifentanil Infusions as Adjuvants to Desflurane Anesthesia

Background: Because adenosine has been alleged to produce both anesthetic and analgesic sparing effects, a randomized, double-blinded study was designed to compare the perioperative effects of adenosine and remifentanil when administered as intravenous adjuvants during general anesthesia for major gynecologic procedures.

Methods: Thirty-two women were assigned randomly to one of two drug treatment groups. After premedication with 0.04 mg/kg intravenous midazolam, anesthesia was induced with 2 [micro sign]g/kg intravenous fentanyl, 1.5 mg/kg intravenous propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg intravenous rocuronium, and maintained with desflurane, 2%, and nitrous oxide, 65%, in oxygen. Before skin incision, an infusion of either remifentanil (0.02 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or adenosine (25 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was started and subsequently titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or both within 10-15% of the preincision values.

Results: Adenosine and remifentanil infusions were effective anesthetic adjuvants during lower abdominal surgery. Use of adenosine (mean +/- SEM, 166 +/- 17 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was associated with a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure and higher heart rate values compared with remifentanil (mean +/- SEM, 0.2 +/- 0.03 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1). Total postoperative opioid analgesic use was 45% and 27% lower in the adenosine group at 0-2 h and 2-24 h after surgery, respectively.     

Determination of the Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Propofol and Remifentanil during Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children

Background: Propofol is commonly used to anesthetize children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Opioids are often used in combination with propofol to provide total intravenous anesthesia. Because both propofol and remifentanil are associated with rapid onset and offset, the combination of these two drugs may be particularly useful for procedures of short duration, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The authors previously demonstrated that the median effective concentration (C50) of propofol during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children is 3.55 [mu]g/ml. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction of remifentanil and propofol when used in combination for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.

Methods: The authors studied 32 children aged between 3 and 10 yr who were scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Propofol was administered via a target-controlled infusion system using the STANPUMP software based on a pediatric pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanil was administered as a constant rate infusion of 25, 50, and 100 ng [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 to each of three study groups, respectively. A sigmoid Emax model was developed to describe the interaction of remifentanil and propofol.

Results: There was a positive interaction between remifentanil and propofol when used in combination. The concentration of propofol alone associated with 50% probability of no response was 3.7 [mu]g/ml (SE, 0.4 [mu]g/ml), and this was decreased to 2.8 [mu]g/ml (SE, 0.1 [mu]g/ml) when used in combination with remifentanil.     

Local Cerebral Blood Flow, Local Cerebral Glucose Utilization, and Flow-Metabolism Coupling during Sevoflurane versus Isoflurane Anesthesia in Rats

Background: Compared to isoflurane, knowledge of local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) during sevoflurane anesthesia is limited.

Methods: LCGU, LCBF, and their overall means were measured in Sprague-Dawley rats (8 groups, n = 6 each) during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia, 1 and 2 MAC, and in conscious control animals (2 groups, n = 6 each) using the autoradiographic 2-[(14) C]deoxy-D-glucose and 4-iodo-N-methyl-[(14) C]antipyrine methods.

Results: During anesthesia, mean cerebral glucose utilization was decreased: control, 56 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot]-1; 1 MAC isoflurane, 32 +/- 4 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-43%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 37 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-34%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 23 +/- 3 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-58%); 2 MAC sevoflurane, 23 +/- 5 [micro sign]mol [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (-59%). Local analysis showed a reduction in LCGU in the majority of the 40 brain regions analyzed. Mean cerebral blood flow was increased as follows: control, 93 +/- 8 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1; 1 MAC isoflurane, 119 +/- 19 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+28%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 104 +/- 15 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+12%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 149 +/- 17 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+60%); 2 MAC sevoflurane, 118 +/- 21 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 (+27%). LCBF was increased in most brain structures investigated. Correlation coefficients obtained for the relationship between LCGU and LCBF were as follows: control, 0.93; 1 MAC isoflurane, 0.89; 2 MAC isoflurane, 0.71; 1 MAC sevoflurane, 0.83; 2 MAC sevoflurane, 0.59).     

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the New Steroid Hypnotic Eltanolone in Healthy Volunteers

Background: In the last 4 y, several authors have reported largely satisfactory results using the new steroid intravenous anesthetic eltanolone (pregnanolone) to induce anesthesia. Until now, however, no investigations have addressed the infusion pharmacokinetics of eltanolone or used electroencephalographic effect data for full pharmacodynamic modeling. Thus the authors conducted a study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of eltanolone after infusion in healthy volunteers.

Methods: Eltanolone emulsion was administered to 12 healthy men using a computer-controlled infusion device. Linearly increasing serum concentrations were generated for two consecutive infusions with an anticipated slope of 0.075 micro gram [centered dot] ml sup -1 [centered dot] min sup -1 and a targeted concentration of 2-2.5 micro gram/ml. During and after the infusion, electroencephalographic data were recorded as a continuous pharmacodynamic parameter to measure the hypnotic effect. In addition, blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry, clinical signs of anesthesia, and any undesirable effects were recorded. The appearance of burst suppression periods in the raw electroencephalographic wave form was used as an end point for the infusion. Arterial blood samples were drawn frequently until 720 min after the cessation of the last infusion cycle. Eltanolone serum concentrations were measured using a specific gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Nonlinear regression analysis was used to relate a power spectral parameter of the electroencephalograph (median frequency) to the serum concentration using a sigmoid Emax model, including an effect compartment to minimize possible hysteresis. Population pharmacokinetics were analyzed using an open three-compartment model.

Results: The pharmacokinetic model parameters of eltanolone were characterized by a high total clearance (1.75 +/- 0.22 l/min), small volumes of distribution (Vc = 7.65 +/- 3.40 l; Vdss = 91.6 +/- 22 l), and relatively short half-lives (t1/2 alpha = 1.5 +/- 0.6 min; t1/2 beta = 27 +/- 5 min; t1/2 gamma = 184 +/- 32 min). With regard to the pharmacodynamic model parameters, eltanolone proved to be a potent hypnotic agent (Cp50 = 0.46 +/- 0.09 micro gram/ml). The hypnotic effect coincided with a remarkable hysteresis between serum concentration and biophase, determined by an equilibration half-life of 8 min (ke0 = 0.087 +/- 0.013 min sup -1). All volunteers breathed spontaneously during the entire observation period and showed no clinically relevant hemodynamic changes. One volunteer experienced a convulsion while awakening.     

Prophylactic Angiotensin II Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery

Background: Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes less uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such as phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given either prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery.

Methods: Fifty-four women were randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intravenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section delivery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin II (2.5 [micro sign]g/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and 50 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1, respectively. The rate of each infusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90-100% of baseline.

Results: Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean +/- SD) through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150 +/- 100, 310 +/- 180, and 500 +/- 320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480 +/- 210, 660 +/- 390, and 790 +/- 640 [micro sign]g/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin group. Umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group.     

Physicochemical Properties, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Reformulated Microemulsion Propofol in Rats

Background: A newly developed microemulsion propofol consisted of 10% purified poloxamer 188 and 0.7% polyethylene glycol 660 hydroxystearate. The authors studied the physicochemical properties, aqueous free propofol concentration, and plasma bradykinin generation. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were also evaluated in rats.

Methods: The pH, particle size, and osmolarity of microemulsion propofol were measured using a pH meter, particle size analyzer, and cryoscopic osmometer, respectively. The aqueous free propofol and plasma bradykinin were measured by a dialysis method and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Microemulsion propofol was administered by zero-order infusion of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 for 20 min in 30 rats. The electroencephalographic approximate entropy was used as a surrogate measure of propofol effect.

Results: The pH, osmolarity, and particle size of microemulsion propofol are 7.5, 280 mOsm/l, and 67.0 +/- 28.5 nm, respectively. The aqueous free propofol concentration in microemulsion propofol was 63.3 +/- 1.2 [mu]g/ml. When mixed with human blood, microemulsion propofol did not generate bradykinin in plasma. Although microemulsion propofol had nonlinear pharmacokinetics, a two-compartment model with linear pharmacokinetics best described the time course of the propofol concentration as follows: V1 = 0.143 l/kg, k10 = 0.175 min-1, k12 = 0.126 min-1, k21 = 0.043 min-1. The pharmacodynamic parameters in a sigmoid Emax model were as follows: E0 = 1.18, Emax = 0.636, Ce50 = 1.87 [mu]g/ml, [gamma] = 1.28, ke0 = 1.02 min-1.     

Metabolism of remifentanil during liver transplantation

We have investigated the pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and its less potent metabolite, GR90291, in six adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). A single bolus infusion of remifentanil 10 micrograms kg-1 min-1 was given at the beginning of the dissection and anhepatic phases of OLT. Remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations were measured in subsequent serial arterial and mixed venous blood samples. Mean arterial clearance of remifentanil was significantly greater (P = 0.02) in the dissection phase (79.54 ml min-1 kg-1) than in the anhepatic phase (39.57 ml min-1 kg-1). Steady state volumes of distribution were not significantly different. Clearance of remifentanil during the anhepatic phase was similar to that of healthy adult patients. Mean maximum concentration (Cpmax) of GR90291 was lower in the dissection phase than in the anhepatic phase (P = 0.026). There was no significant pulmonary metabolism of remifentanil.      

Response Surface Modeling of Remifentanil-Propofol Interaction on Cardiorespiratory Control and Bispectral Index

Background: Since propofol and remifentanil are frequently combined for monitored anesthesia care, we examined the influence of the separate and combined administration of these agents on cardiorespiratory control and bispectral index in humans.

Methods: The effect of steady-state concentrations of remifentanil and propofol was assessed in 22 healthy male volunteer subjects. For each subject, measurements were obtained from experiments using remifentanil alone, propofol alone, and remifentanil plus propofol (measured arterial blood concentration range: propofol studies, 0-2.6 [mu]g/ml; remifentanil studies, 0-2.0 ng/ml). Respiratory experiments consisted of ventilatory responses to three to eight increases in end-tidal Pco2 (Petco2). Invasive blood pressure, heart rate, and bispectral index were monitored concurrently. The nature of interaction was assessed by response surface modeling using a population approach with NONMEM. Values are population estimate plus or minus standard error.

Results: A total of 94 responses were obtained at various drug combinations. When given separately, remifentanil and propofol depressed cardiorespiratory variables in a dose-dependent fashion (resting [latin capital V with dot above]i: 12.6 +/- 3.3% and 27.7 +/- 3.5% depression at 1 [mu]g/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively; [latin capital V with dot above]i at fixed Petco2 of 55 mmHg: 44.3 +/- 3.9% and 57.7 +/- 3.5% depression at 1 [mu]g/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively; blood pressure: 9.9 +/- 1.8% and 3.7 +/- 1.1% depression at 1 [mu]g/ml propofol and 1 ng/ml remifentanil, respectively). When given in combination, their effect on respiration was synergistic (greatest synergy observed for resting [latin capital V with dot above]i). The effects of both drugs on heart rate and blood pressure were modest, with additive interactions when combined. Over the dose range studied, remifentanil had no effect on bispectral index even when combined with propofol (inert interaction).     

Narcotrend Monitoring Allows Faster Emergence and a Reduction of Drug Consumption in Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia

Background: The Narcotrend is a new electroencephalographic monitor designed to measure depth of anesthesia, based on a six-letter classification from A (awake) to F (increasing burst suppression) including 14 substages. This study was designed to investigate the impact of Narcotrend monitoring on recovery times and propofol consumption in comparison to Bispectral Index(R) (BIS(R)) monitoring or standard anesthetic practice.

Methods: With institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 120 adult patients scheduled to undergo minor orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive a propofol-remifentanil anesthetic controlled by Narcotrend, by BIS(R), or solely by clinical parameters. Anesthesia was induced with 0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil and a propofol target-controlled infusion at 3.5 [mu]g/ml. After intubation, remifentanil was reduced to 0.2 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1, whereas the propofol infusion was adjusted according to clinical parameters or to the following target values: during maintenance to D0 (Narcotrend) or 50 (BIS(R)); 15 min before the end of surgery to C1 (Narcotrend) or 60 (BIS(R)). Recovery times were recorded by a blinded investigator, and average normalized propofol consumption was calculated from induction and maintenance doses.

Results: The groups were comparable for demographic data, duration of anesthesia, and mean remifentanil dosages. Compared with standard practice, patients with Narcotrend or BIS(R) monitoring needed significantly less propofol (standard practice, 6.8 +/- 1.2 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1vs. Narcotrend, 4.5 +/- 1.1 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1 or BIS(R), 4.8 +/- 1.0 mg [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1;P < 0.001), opened their eyes earlier (9.3 +/- 5.2 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.2 or 3.5 +/- 2.9 min), and were extubated sooner (9.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 2.2 or 4.1 +/- 2.9 min).     

High-dose Remifentanil Does Not Impair Cerebrovascular Carbon Dioxide Reactivity in Healthy Male Volunteers

Background: Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity during high-dose remifentanil infusion was investigated in volunteers by measurement of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and mean CBF velocity (CBFv).

Methods: Ten healthy male volunteers with a laryngeal mask for artificial ventilation received remifentanil at an infusion rate of 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 under normocapnia, hypocapnia, and hypercapnia. Stable xenon-enhanced computed tomography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography of the left middle cerebral artery were used to assess rCBF and mean CBFv, respectively. If required, blood pressure was maintained within baseline values with intravenous phenylephrine to avoid confounding effects of altered hemodynamics.

Results: Hemodynamic parameters were maintained constant over time. Remifentanil infusion at 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 significantly decreased rCBF and mean CBFv. Both rCBF and mean CBFv increased as the arterial carbon dioxide tension increased from hypocapnia to hypercapnia, indicating that cerebrovascular reactivity remained intact. The average slopes of rCBF reactivity were 0.56 +/- 0.27 and 0.49 +/- 0.28 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for 2 and 4 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 remifentanil, respectively (relative change in percent/mmHg: 1.9 +/- 0.8 and 1.6 +/- 0.5, respectively). The average slopes for mean CBFv reactivity were 1.61 +/- 0.95 and 1.54 +/- 0.83 cm [middle dot] s-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for 2 and 4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil, respectively (relative change in percent/mmHg: 1.86 +/- 0.59 and 1.79 +/- 0.59, respectively). Preanesthesia and postanesthesia values of rCBF and mean CBFv did not differ.     

The Effects of Meperidine and Sufentanil on the Shivering Threshold in Postoperative Patients

Background: Meperidine (pethidine) reportedly treats postoperative shivering better than equianalgesic doses of other [micro sign]-receptor agonists. The authors' first goal was to develop a method to accurately determine postoperative shivering threshold, and then to determine the extent to which meperidine and sufentanil inhibit postoperative shivering.

Methods: A computer-controlled infusion was started before operation in 30 patients, with target plasma concentrations of 0.15, 0.30, or 0.60 [micro sign]g/ml meperidine or 0.1, 0.15, or 0.2 ng/ml sufentanil targeted; patients were randomly assigned to each drug and concentration. The infusion was continued throughout surgery and recovery. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Core temperatures were [almost equal to] 34 [degree sign]C by the end of surgery. The compensated core temperature at which visible shivering and a 20% decrease in steady-state oxygen consumption was recorded identified the shivering threshold. A blood sample for opioid concentration was obtained from each patient at this time. The ability of each opioid to reduce the shivering threshold was evaluated using linear regression.

Results: End-tidal isoflurane concentrations were <0.2% in each group at the time of extubation, and shivering occurred [almost equal to] 1 h later. Meperidine linearly decreased the shivering threshold: threshold ([degree sign]C) = -2.8 [middle dot] [meperidine ([micro sign]g/ml)] + 36.2; r2 = 0.64, P = 0.0005. Sufentanil also linearly decreased the shivering threshold: threshold ([degree sign]C) = -7.8 [middle dot] [sufentanil (ng/ml)] + 36.9; r (2) = 0.46, P = 0.02.     

Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: I. Model Development

Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results concerning the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil.

Methods: Sixty-five healthy adults (38 men and 27 women) ages 20 to 85 y received remifentanil by constant-rate infusion of 1 to 8 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 [centered dot] min sup -1 for 4 to 20 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were drawn and assayed for remifentanil concentration. The electroencephalogram was used as a measure of drug effect. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using the software package NONMEM. The influence of volunteer covariates were analyzed using a generalized additive model. The performances of the simple (without covariates) and complex (with covariates) models were evaluated prospectively in an additional 15 healthy participants ages 41 to 84 y.

Results: The parameters for the simple three-compartment pharmacokinetic model were V1 = 4.98 l, V2 = 9.01 l, V3 = 6.54 l, Cl1 = 2.46 l/min, Cl2 = 1.69 l/min, and Cl3 = 0.065 l/min. Age and lean body mass were significant covariates. From the ages of 20 to 85 y, V1 and Cl1 decreased by approximately 25% and 33%, respectively. The parameters for the simple sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model were ke0 = 0.516 min sup -1, E0 = 20 Hz, Emax = 5.62 Hz, EC50 = 11.2 ng/ml, and gamma = 2.51. Age was a significant covariate of EC50 and ke0, with both decreasing by approximately 50% for the age range studied. The complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model performed better than did the simple model when applied prospectively.     

Concentration-Effect Relation of Succinylcholine Chloride during Propofol Anesthesia

Background: The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of succinylcholine were studied simultaneously in anesthetized patients to understand why the drug has a rapid onset and short duration of action. A quantitative model describing the concentration-effect relation of succinylcholine was proposed. The correlation between in vitro hydrolysis in plasma and in vivo elimination was also examined.

Methods: Before induction of anesthesia, blood was drawn for in vitro analysis in seven adults. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil. Single twitch stimulation was applied at the ulnar nerve every 10 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis was measured. Arterial blood was drawn frequently after succinylcholine injection to characterize the front-end kinetics. Plasma concentrations were measured by mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using compartmental and noncompartmental approaches. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relations were estimated.

Results: The mean in vitro degradation rate constant in plasma (1.07 +/- 0.49 min-1) was not different from the in vivo elimination rate constant (0.97 +/- 0.30 min-1), and an excellent correlation (r2 = 0.94) was observed. Total body clearance derived using noncompartmental (37 +/- 7 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1) and compartmental (37 +/- 9 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1) approaches were similar. The plasma-effect compartment equilibration rate constant (keo) was 0.058 +/- 0.026 min-1, and the effect compartment concentration at 50% block was 734 +/- 211 ng/ml.     

Nefopam, a Nonsedative Benzoxazocine Analgesic, Selectively Reduces the Shivering Threshold in Unanesthetized Subjects

Background: The analgesic nefopam does not compromise ventilation, is minimally sedating, and is effective as a treatment for postoperative shivering. The authors evaluated the effects of nefopam on the major thermoregulatory responses in humans: sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering.

Methods: Nine volunteers were studied on three randomly assigned days: (1) control (saline), (2) nefopam at a target plasma concentration of 35 ng/ml (low dose), and (3) nefopam at a target concentration of 70 ng/ml (high dose, approximately 20 mg total). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. The authors determined the thresholds (triggering core temperature at a designated skin temperature of 34[degrees]C) by mathematically compensating for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response.

Results: Nefopam did not significantly modify the slopes for sweating (0.0 +/- 4.9[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.73 +/- 0.32) or vasoconstriction (-3.6 +/- 5.0[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = -0.47 +/- 0.41). In contrast, nefopam significantly reduced the slope of shivering (-16.8 +/- 9.3[degrees]C [middle dot] [mu]g-1 [middle dot] ml; r2 = 0.92 +/- 0.06). Therefore, high-dose nefopam reduced the shivering threshold by 0.9 +/- 0.4[degrees]C (P < 0.001) without any discernible effect on the sweating or vasoconstriction thresholds.     

Sex Differences in Morphine-induced Ventilatory Depression Reside within the Peripheral Chemoreflex Loop

Background: This study gathers information in humans on the sites of sex-related differences in ventilatory depression caused by the [micro sign]-opioid receptor agonist morphine.

Methods: Experiments were performed in healthy young men (n = 9) and women (n = 7). Dynamic ventilatory responses to square-wave changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (7.5-15 mmHg) and step decreases in end-tidal oxygen tension (step from 110 to 50 mmHg, duration of hypoxia 15 min) were obtained before and during morphine infusion (intravenous bolus dose 100 [micro sign]g/kg, followed by 30 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] h-1). Each hypercapnic response was separated into a fast peripheral and slow central component, which yield central (Gc) and peripheral (Gp) carbon dioxide sensitivities. Values are mean +/- SD.

Results: In carbon dioxide studies in men, morphine reduced Gc from 1.61 +/- 0.33 to 1.23 +/- 0.12 l [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05) without affecting Gp (control, 0.41 +/- 0.16 and morphine, 0.49 +/- 0.12 l [middle dot] [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1, not significant). In carbon dioxide studies in women, morphine reduced Gc, from 1.51 +/- 0.74 to 1.17 +/- 0.52 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05), and Gp, from 0.54 +/- 0.19 to 0.39 +/- 0.22 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 (P < 0.05). Morphine-induced changes in Gc were equal in men and women; changes in Gp were greater in women. In hypoxic studies, morphine depressed the hyperventilatory response at the initiation of hypoxia more in women than in men (0.54 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.34 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] %-1, respectively; P < 0.05). The ventilatory response to sustained hypoxia (i.e., 15 min) did not differ between men and women.     

Dexmedetomidine Does Not Alter the Sweating Threshold, But Comparably and Linearly Decreases the Vasoconstriction and Shivering Thresholds

Background: Clonidine decreases the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. It thus seems likely that the alpha2 agonist dexmedetomidine will also impair control of body temperature. Accordingly, the authors evaluated the dose-dependent effects of dexmedetomidine on the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds. They also measured the effects of dexmedetomidine on heart rate, blood pressures, and plasma catecholamine concentrations.

Methods: Nine male volunteers participated in this randomized, double-blind, cross-over protocol. The study drug was administered by computer-controlled infusion, targeting plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations of 0.0, 0.3, and 0.6 ng/ml. Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased to provoke sweating and then subsequently reduced to elicit vasoconstriction and shivering. Core-temperature thresholds were computed using established linear cutaneous contributions to control of sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering. The dose-dependent effects of dexmedetomidine on thermoregulatory response thresholds were then determined using linear regression. Heart rate, arterial blood pressures, and plasma catecholamine concentrations were determined at baseline and at each threshold.

Results: Neither dexmedetomidine concentration increased the sweating threshold from control values. In contrast, dexmedetomidine administration reduced the vasoconstriction threshold by 1.61 +/- 0.80 [degree sign] Celsius [center dot] ng sup -1 [center dot] ml (mean +/- SD) and the shivering threshold by 2.40 +/- 0.90 [degree sign] Celsius [center dot] ng sup -1 [center dot] ml. Hemodynamic responses and catecholamine concentrations were reduced from baseline values, but they did not differ at the two tested dexmedetomidine doses.