首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
One of the goals of the medical management of head injured patients is to get a cerebral perfusion pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg. To reach such a goal, catecholamines are used after fluid challenge. Systemic effects of catecholamines depend on their affinity for the receptors alpha and beta. The topical application of norepinephrine (alpha predominant) induced a vasoconstriction on large cerebral arteries only. Cerebral blood flow increased in the pericontusionnal area, suggesting a loss of autoregulation. The topical application of dopamine at low concentration relaxed large cerebral arteries. Dopamine increased cerebral blood flow in the pericontusional area but data suggest a possible raise in the volume of contusion. Four human comparative studies have been published. The first study, which was not randomized, showed an intracranial pressure increase associated with dopamine. Two randomized clinical trials, published by the same group, demonstrated a better predictability with norepinephrine. The fourth study did not find any difference regarding cerebral haemodynamics. In conclusion, the quality of data on the effects of catecholamines on cerebral haemodynamics of head injured patients do not make it possible to conclude about their use.  相似文献   

2.
Spinal anaesthesia is the gold standard for elective caesarean section. This technique presents several adverse effects. We report a severe case of hypothermia (33.3 degrees C) after spinal administration of bupivacaine (10 mg) and morphine (100 microg) for elective caesarean section. After excluding other causes of hypothermia, this one could be explained by both the own effects of local anaesthesia (i.e. peripheral vasodilatation) and by the central effect of intrathecal morphine. Because hypothermia is not predictable after spinal injection of morphine both monitoring of central temperature and active warming of the patients could be proposed. Naloxone has been proposed in a case of hypothermia related to spinal injection of morphine.  相似文献   

3.
The aim of sedation and analgesia is to prevent secondary brain insult. The goals of sedation are the prevention and treatment of intracranial hypertension and systemic disorders. In such situation, the use of sedative and analgesic therapy should respect the rate of cerebral blood flow/cerebral oxygen consumption coupling while preserving cerebral perfusion pressure and decreasing the intracranial pressure. This treatment should have an analgesic and myorelaxing action with short and predictable time of action. The optimal agent with all these characteristics does not exist, but the combination of several pharmacological compounds may reach this goal. Benzodiazepines are the most frequently agents used. In most of cases they are associated with analgesics like opioids or ketamine. Opioids are the basis of analgesia because they do not produce brain haemodynamic alterations if arterial pressure is maintained. Ketamine, which use in this indication is matter of debate, has the advantage to maintain haemodynamics. Ketamine has no side effects on brain haemodynamics when used in combination with propofol or midazolam. Because of their side effects on haemodynamics and immune response, barbituric are no longer used as long term sedative agents. However, they are still recommended in cases of refractory intracranial hypertension. Propofol remains the optimal sedative agent because of its short duration action although its use is restricted because it is an expensive drug. Its use is recommended for short time sedation with or without opioids. The use of neuromuscular blockers should be focused on the patients with an intracranial hypertension refractory to standard treatment. The presence of brain damage in patients makes difficult to assess the level of sedation. One should avoid over sedation, which increases morbidity by prolongation of the duration of mechanical ventilation.  相似文献   

4.
Studies at the population level must take into account the effect of social insecurity and socioeconomic inequalities on the patient outcomes. Socioeconomic inequalities depend on many determinants that are socially determined. In renal transplantation, these social determinants are not registered in the databases. The European Deprivation Index (EDI) is a composite index of social vulnerability with a French version. The EDI is an ecological measure of deprivation including the individual perception of basic needs for daily life that is called “subjective poverty”. The Townsend index, Carstairs index and the Index of Multiple Deprivation are other ecological index available. It has been demonstrated in the United States that socioeconomic indicators of deprivation were associated with both the access to the waiting list for renal transplantation and transplantation failure. In France, socioeconomic deprivation may also affect the access to the waiting list and outcome of transplantation. This article is a review about deprivation and renal transplantation.  相似文献   

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号