Anterior and posterior shoulder instability. A cadaver study

In a cadaver study of 10 glenohumeral joint specimens, the anterior and posterior displacement of the humeral head was recorded after cutting parts of the rotator cuff and capsular structures applying a constant force to the humerus. The posterior structures were important for anterior stability in the first 40 degrees of abduction. Anterior subluxation was changed to luxation in the first half of abduction, but only after lesions to the anterior part of the rotator cuff and upper half of the anterior capsule. For posterior displacement, the posterior part of the rotator cuff was found significant from 0-90 degrees of abduction, and the posterior capsule between 40 degrees and 90 degrees of abduction. The anterior part of the rotator cuff and the upper part of the anterior capsule were essential in the first 40 degrees of abduction. Cutting the capsular structures only, we found that the entire anterior capsule resisted anterior displacement for 70-90 degrees of abduction, and the entire posterior capsule from 50-90 degrees of abduction. For posterior displacement, the entire posterior capsule was important from 60 to 90 degrees of abduction. Clinically, a large lesion to the posterior structures seems to be essential for any major anterior displacement, and posterior displacement leading to subluxation only seems possible in connection with a major anterior injury.     

Anterior shoulder stability: Contributions of rotator cuff forces and the capsular ligaments in a cadaver model

The purpose of this study was to quantify in a biomechanical model the contributions to shoulder joint stability that are made by tensions in the four tendons of the rotator cuff and by static resistance of defined portions of the capsular ligaments. A materials testing machine was used to directly determine anterior joint laxity by measurement of the force required to produce a standard anterior subluxation. Shoulders were tested in external or neutral humeral rotation. Data were analyzed by multiway analysis of variance with regression analysis. This model simulated tensions in the rotator cuff musculature by applying static loads at the tendon insertion sites acting along the anatomic lines of action. A load in any of the cuff tendons resulted in a measurable and statistically significant contribution to anterior joint stability. The contributions between different tendons were not significantly different and did not depend on the humeral rotation (neutral or external). In neutral humeral rotation the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments together function equally with the inferior glenohumeral ligament as primary stabilizers against anterior humeral translation. The posterior capsule is a secondary stabilizer. The external rotation of the abducted humerus increases anterior stability by more than doubling the stability contribution from the inferior glenohumeral ligament. The stability contribution from the posterior capsule is larger in external rotation than in neutral rotation but is still of secondary magnitude. In external rotation the stability contribution of the anterior capsule, including the superior glenohumeral ligament and the middle glenohumeral ligament, becomes insignificant. The model presented here simulates the combined effect of two major sources of shoulder stability. This versatile model permits the direct measurement of the contributions to anterior shoulder stability that are made by tensions in the rotator cuff tendons and by static resistance of defined capsular zones. The use of multiple regression analysis-a standard statistical technique but one relatively new to the orthopaedic literature-permits quantitative determination of the contribution of each independent variable to the dependent variable, shoulder stability.     

The effect of rotator cuff tears on reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint.

The rotator cuff muscles maintain glenohumeral stability by compressing the humeral head into the glenoid. Disruption of the rotator cuff compromises concavity compression and can directly affect the loads on the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of rotator cuff tears on the magnitude and direction of glenohumeral joint reaction forces during active shoulder abduction in the scapular plane using nine cadaveric upper extremities. Motion of the full upper extremity was simulated using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. Glenohumeral joint reaction forces were measured by a universal force-moment sensor. Five conditions of rotator cuff tears were tested: Intact, Incomplete Supraspinatus Tear, Complete Supraspinatus Tear, Supraspinatus/Infraspinatus Tear, and Global Tear. Reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint were found to steadily increase throughout abduction and peaked at maximum abduction for all conditions tested. There were no significant differences in reaction force magnitude for the intact condition (337 +/- 88 N) or those involving an isolated incomplete tear (296 +/- 83 N) or complete tear (300 +/- 85 N) of the supraspinatus tendon. Extension of tears beyond the supraspinatus tendon into the anterior and posterior aspect of the rotator cuff led to a significant decrease in the magnitude of joint reaction force (126 +/- 31 N). Similarly, such tears resulted in a significant change in the direction of the reaction force at the glenohumeral joint. These results suggest that joint reaction forces are significantly affected by the integrity of the rotator cuff, specifically, by the transverse force couple formed by the anterior and posterior aspects of the cuff. The quantitative data obtained in this study on the effect of rotator cuff tears on magnitude and direction of the reaction force at the glenohumeral joint helps clarify the relationship between joint motion, joint compression and stability.     

Anterior and posterior shoulder instability: A cadaver study

In a cadaver study of 10 glenohumeral joint specimens, the anterior and posterior displacement of the humeral head was recorded after cutting parts of the rotator cuff and capsular structures applying a constant force to the humerus. The posterior structures were important for anterior stability in the first 40° of abduction. Anterior subluxation was changed to luxation in the first half of abduction, but only after lesions to the anterior part of the rotator cuff and upper half of the anterior capsule. For posterior displacement, the posterior part of the rotator cuff was found significant from 0-90° of abduction, and the posterior capsule between 40° and 90° of abduction. The anterior part of the rotator cuff and the upper part of the anterior capsule were essential in the first 40° of abduction. Cutting the capsular structures only, we found that the entire anterior capsule resisted anterior displacement for 70-90° of abduction, and the entire posterior capsule from 50-90° of abduction. For posterior displacement, the entire posterior capsule was important from 60 to 90° of abduction.

Clinically, a large lesion to the posterior structures seems to be essential for any major anterior displacement, and posterior displacement leading to subluxation only seems possible in connection with a major anterior injury.     

Dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by the rotator cuff muscles in the mid-range and end-range of motion. A study in cadavera

BACKGROUND: Both static and dynamic factors are responsible for glenohumeral joint stability. We hypothesized that dynamic factors could potentially operate throughout the entire range of glenohumeral motion, although capsuloligamentous restraints (a static factor) have been thought to be primarily responsible for stability in the end-range of motion. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the dynamic glenohumeral joint stability in the end-range of motion (the position of anterior instability) with that in the mid-range by investigating the force components generated by the rotator cuff muscles. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen shoulders from human cadavera were obtained, and all soft tissues except the rotator cuff were removed. The glenohumeral capsule was resected after the rotator cuff muscles had been released from the scapula. A specially designed frame positioned the humerus in 60 degrees of abduction and 45 degrees of extension with respect to the scapula. The compressive and shear components on the glenoid were measured before and after a constant force was applied individually to each muscle with the humerus in five different positions (from neutral to 90 degrees of external rotation). The dynamic stability index, a new biomechanical parameter reflecting these force components and the concavity-compression mechanism, was calculated. The higher the dynamic stability index, the greater the dynamic glenohumeral stability. RESULTS: In the mid-range of motion, the supraspinatus and subscapularis provided higher dynamic stability indices than did the other muscles (p < 0.05). On the other hand, when the position of anterior instability was simulated in the end-range of motion, the subscapularis, infraspinatus, and teres minor provided significantly higher dynamic stability indices than did the supraspinatus (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The rotator cuff provided substantial anterior dynamic stability to the glenohumeral joint in the end-range of motion as well as in the mid-range. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A glenohumeral joint with a lax capsule and ligaments might be stabilized dynamically in the end-range of motion if the glenoid concavity is maintained and the function of the external and internal rotators, which are efficient stabilizers in this position, is enhanced.     

Dynamic capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint

Though many anatomic and biomechanical studies have been performed to elucidate capsuloligamentous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint, no previous studies have evaluated capsuloligamentous anatomy during rotator cuff contraction. The purpose of this study was to define and document the orientation and interrelationship between the glenohumeral ligaments during simulated rotator cuff contraction. Six fresh cadaveric shoulders were arthroscoped to document and grade ligamentous anatomy. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments and the anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex were labeled by an arthroscopicassisted technique with a linked metallic bead system. Shoulders were then placed onto an experimental apparatus that simulated rotator cuff function through computer-controlled servo-hydrolic actuators attached to the rotator cuff and biceps by a clamp and cable-and-pulley system. Simulated rotator cuff action and manual placement allowed shoulders to be placed into three positions of rotation (neutral, internal, and external) in three positions of scapular plane abduction (0°, 45°, 90°). Anteroposterior and axillary lateral plane radiographs were taken in each position to document orientation of all four ligaments. Both the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments were maximally lengthened in 0° and 45° abduction and external rotation and appeared to shorten in all positions of abduction. The anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament complex maintained a cruciate orientation in all positions of abduction in the anteroposterior plane, except at 90° abduction and external rotation, where they are parallel. This cruciate orientation is due to the different location of the glenoid origin and humeral insertion of each band and may allow reciprocal tightening of each during rotation. The glenohumeral capsule is composed of discreet ligaments that undergo large charges in orientation during rotation. The superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments appear to complement the inferior glenohumeral ligaments, with the former tightening in adduction and the latter tightening in abduction. This relationship permits the large range of motion normally seen in the glenohumeral joint.     

In situ force distribution in the glenohumeral joint capsule during anterior-posterior loading.

Our objective was to examine the function of the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments during application of an anterior-posterior load by directly measuring the in situ force distribution in these structures as well as the compliance of the joint. We hypothesized that interaction between different regions of the capsule due to its continuous nature results in a complex force distribution throughout the glenohumeral joint capsule. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was utilized to determine the force distribution in the glenohumeral capsule and ligaments of intact shoulder specimens and the joint kinematics resulting from the application of external loads at four abduction angles. Our results suggest that the glenohumeral capsule carries no force when the humeral head is centered in the glenoid with the humerus in anatomic rotation. However, once an anterior-posterior load is applied to the joint, the glenohumeral ligaments carry force (during anterior loading, the superior glenohumeral-coracohumeral ligaments carried 26+/-16 N at 0 degrees and the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament carried 30+/-21 N at 90 degrees). Therefore, the patient's ability to use the arm with the humerus in anatomic rotation should not be limited following repair procedures for shoulder instability because the repaired capsuloligamentous structures should not carry force during this motion. Separation of the capsule into its components revealed that forces are being transmitted between each region and that the glenohumeral ligaments do not act as traditional ligaments that carry a pure tensile force along their length. The interrelationship of the glenohumeral ligaments forms the biomechanical basis for the capsular shift procedure. The compliance of the joint under our loading conditions indicates that the passive properties of the capsule provide little resistance to motion of the humerus during 10 mm of anterior or posterior translation with anatomic humeral rotation. Finally, this knowledge also enhances the understanding of arm positioning relative to the portion of the glenohumeral capsule that limits translation during examination under anesthesia.     

Influence of rotator cuff tears on glenohumeral stability during abduction tasks

One of the main goals in reconstructing rotator cuff tears is the restoration of glenohumeral joint stability, which is subsequently of utmost importance in order to prevent degenerative damage such as superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesion, arthrosis, and malfunction. The goal of the current study was to facilitate musculoskeletal models in order to estimate glenohumeral instability introduced by muscle weakness due to cuff lesions. Inverse dynamics simulations were used to compute joint reaction forces for several static abduction tasks with different muscle weakness. Results were compared with the existing literature in order to ensure the model validity. Further arm positions taken from activities of daily living, requiring the rotator cuff muscles were modeled and their contribution to joint kinetics computed. Weakness of the superior rotator cuff muscles (supraspinatus; infraspinatus) leads to a deviation of the joint reaction force to the cranial dorsal rim of the glenoid. Massive rotator cuff defects showed higher potential for glenohumeral instability in contrast to single muscle ruptures. The teres minor muscle seems to substitute lost joint torque during several simulated muscle tears to maintain joint stability. Joint instability increases with cuff tear size. Weakness of the upper part of the rotator cuff leads to a joint reaction force closer to the upper glenoid rim. This indicates the comorbidity of cuff tears with SLAP lesions. The teres minor is crucial for maintaining joint stability in case of massive cuff defects and should be uprated in clinical decision‐making. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1628–1635, 2016.     

Rotator cuff function in the impingement syndrome

Thirty-three patients with impingement syndrome of the rotator cuff were studied before and at operation. It was shown that the rotator cuff lengthens and twists during elevation of the arm. Elevation is achieved by early glenohumeral abduction and continuous flexion and external rotation. The range of free rotation at the glenohumeral joint diminishes progressively during elevation. Rotator cuff impingement occurs towards the end of the early glenohumeral abduction. Excision arthroplasty of the acromioclavicular joint and anterior acromioplasty is highly effective for impingement under the acromion, but only moderately effective where impingement is under the acromioclavicular joint.     

Release of the coracoacromial ligament can lead to glenohumeral laxity: a biomechanical study

The purpose of this study was to determine change in glenohumeral joint translation after release of the coracoacromial ligament. Six fresh, frozen unpaired glenohumeral joints were tested in a neutral position and at 30 degrees internal and 30 degrees external rotation of the humerus at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction on a custom glenohumeral joint translation testing apparatus. A joint compression load of 20 N was simulated; then a 15-N load was applied to the humerus in anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior directions, and translations on the glenoid were measured with an electromagnetic tracking device. The tests were then repeated after a 1.5-cm section of the coracoacromial ligament was released from the acromion. A multivariate analysis of variance was used for statistical analyses with a P value of.05 as the level of significance. At 0 degrees and 30 degrees of abduction, release of the coracoacromial ligament resulted in a significant increase in glenohumeral joint translations, in both the anterior and inferior directions. In addition, the differences in translation between before and after the release of the coracoacromial ligament decreased in all directions as glenohumeral abduction increased, and they were not significant at 60 degrees of abduction in any of the rotations. The results of this study suggest that the coracoacromial ligament has a role in static restraint of the glenohumeral joint. It provides a suspension function and may restrain anterior and inferior translations through an interaction with the coracohumeral ligament. Although this is a biomechanical study without simulation of the shoulder muscles, it indicates that the coracoacromial ligament contributes to glenohumeral stability. Caution should be exercised in the release of the coracoacromial ligament in those with rotator cuff pain associated with glenohumeral instability.     

Simulated joint and muscle forces in reversed and anatomic shoulder prostheses

Reversed shoulder prostheses are increasingly being used for the treatment of glenohumeral arthropathy associated with a deficient rotator cuff. These non-anatomical implants attempt to balance the joint forces by means of a semi-constrained articular surface and a medialised centre of rotation. A finite element model was used to compare a reversed prosthesis with an anatomical implant. Active abduction was simulated from 0 degrees to 150 degrees of elevation. With the anatomical prosthesis, the joint force almost reached the equivalence of body weight. The joint force was half this for the reversed prosthesis. The direction of force was much more vertically aligned for the reverse prosthesis, in the first 90 degrees of abduction. With the reversed prosthesis, abduction was possible without rotator cuff muscles and required 20% less deltoid force to achieve it. This force analysis confirms the potential mechanical advantage of reversed prostheses when rotator cuff muscles are deficient.     

Experimental investigation of reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint during active abduction

Reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint counterbalance the mass moment of the upper extremity during shoulder motion and are directly related to the activity of muscles across the joint. Because stability of the glenohumeral joint depends on compression of the humeral head into the glenoid, reaction forces constitute an important aspect of shoulder biomechanics. The objective of this study was to measure reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint during active scapula plane abduction. Furthermore, to clarify the relationship between the deltoid and supraspinatus muscles throughout abduction, this study investigated the effect of 4 variations of applied muscle forces on the magnitude and direction of glenohumeral reaction forces. We used a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus equipped with a force-moment sensor to directly measure reaction forces. Joint reaction forces increased throughout abduction and peaked at approximately 90 degrees for all testing conditions. The largest reaction forces occurred when the ratio of applied forces favored the supraspinatus tendon, whereas simulated paralysis of the supraspinatus resulted in a significant decrease in joint compression. There were no differences in direction of the reaction force between testing conditions. The results of this study indicate that the magnitude of glenohumeral joint reaction forces varies according to the ratio of forces between the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles. Thus, conditions characterized by either deltoid or supraspinatus dysfunction may result in abnormal loading mechanics at the glenohumeral joint. Understanding the relationship between rotator cuff function and glenohumeral reaction forces will aid in clarifying the importance of muscular activity to shoulder stability and strength as it relates to compression of the humeral head.     

Glenohumeral motion after complete capsular release.

The range of glenohumeral motion is primarily limited by the joint capsule. If the capsule is contracted, greater restriction in glenohumeral motion is exhibited. Release of a tight capsule has been an effective means of managing refractory stiffness of the glenohumeral joint. The effect of a complete capsular release on glenohumeral kinematics has not been previously studied in a cadaver model. Elevation, rotation, and translation of eight cadaveric glenohumeral preparations were studied before and after complete capsular release. As the intact joint was positioned near the limits of motion, glenohumeral torque rose rapidly with relatively small concomitant increases in elevation and rotational angles. Notable torque, due to tension in the capsule or cuff, ensued only after glenohumeral elevation reached approximately 80% of maximal range. After complete capsular release, maximal elevation increased on average 15%, yet retained definitive endpoints due to residual tension in the rotator cuff. Axial humeral rotation with an intact capsule decreased as maximum elevation approached, especially at elevation angles greater than 60 degrees. Maximum internal rotation was less than external, for all planes except +90 degrees. After complete capsular release, the greatest net gains for external rotation tended to be in the posterior scapular planes, whereas gains for internal rotation tended to be in the anterior scapular planes. Maximal translation in an intact vented capsule was 21 mm, 14 mm, and 15 mm in the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions, respectively. After complete capsular release, translation increased in all positions with maximal anterior, posterior, and inferior translations of 28 mm, 25 mm, and 28 mm, respectively. In general, relative gains in translation were greater in planes posterior to the scapula and at extremes of the range of motion. Although large glenohumeral translations were measured, no preparation could be dislocated before or after complete capsular release. Complete capsular release significantly increased glenohumeral range of motion and translation. The intact rotator cuff myotendinous units serves to limit the range of motion and translation after all capsuloligamentous attachments are rendered incompetent by complete capsular release.     

Biomechanische Evaluation der glenohumeralen Stabilität durch Muskelkraftvektoranalyse

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to quantify the decrease in glenohumeral stability following a global rotator cuff tear and to evaluate the effect of a decreased glenoid inclination angle through analysis of muscle force vectors in a computer model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The lines of action of eight shoulder muscles were integrated into a standard geometric model. Muscle force magnitudes were estimated based on physiological cross-sectional area and normalized electromyographic activity. The magnitude and elevation angle of the resultant force vector was calculated at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of abduction. A rotator cuff tear was simulated by reduction of the corresponding muscle force vectors. RESULTS: At 0 and 30 degrees of glenohumeral abduction a global rotator cuff tear showed a resultant force vector pointing outside the glenoid. In the computer model, decreasing the inclination angle of the glenoid by 30 degrees increased the stability in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a biomechanical rationale for clinical complications of global rotator cuff tear such as superior humeral head translation. The decreased glenoid inclination simulated in the computer model may represent a biomechanical basis for the development of new operative techniques to treat global rotator cuff tears.     

The role of the rotator interval capsule in passive motion and stability of the shoulder.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the role of the capsule in the interval between the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons with respect to glenohumeral motion, translation, and stability. We used a six-degrees-of-freedom position-sensor and a six-degrees-of-freedom force and torque-transducer to determine the glenohumoral rotations and translations that resulted from applied loads in eight cadaver shoulders. The range of motion of each specimen was measured with the capsule in the rotator interval in a normal state, after the capsule had been sectioned, and after it had been imbricated. Operative alteration of this capsular interval was found to affect flexion, extension, external rotation, and adduction of the humerus with respect to the scapula. Modification of this portion of the capsule also affected obligate anterior translation of the humeral head on the glenoid during flexion. Limitation of motion and obligate translation were increased by operative imbrication and diminished by sectioning of the rotator interval capsule. Passive stability of the glenohumeral joint was evaluated with the use of anterior, posterior, and inferior stress tests. Instability and occasional frank dislocation of the glenohumeral joint occurred inferiorly and posteriorly after section of the rotator interval capsule. Imbrication of this part of the capsule increased the resistance to inferior and posterior translation.     

The entire rotator cuff contributes to elevation of the arm

The function of the infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis during elevation of the arm remains poorly defined. These muscles may generate moments that contribute to abduction of the arm, although they frequently are classified as humeral depressors. The purposes of this study were to measure the contributions to abduction made by the more inferiorly positioned rotator cuff muscles relative to the contributions of the supraspinatus and to determine the range of motion at which the muscles are most effective. Five fresh cadaveric shoulder girdles were mounted in an apparatus designed to simulate contraction of the deltoid and rotator cuff while maintaining the normal relationship between glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motions. The deltoid force required for elevation was measured without simulated contraction of the rotator cuff and with simulated contraction of the entire rotator cuff, of the supraspinatus only, and of the infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis only. A significant reduction in deltoid force when other muscle activity was added indicated that the additions contributed significantly to abduction. The deltoid force required with concurrent contraction of the entire rotator cuff averaged 41% less than with the deltoid alone but was not significantly different than with the deltoid and supraspinatus or with the deltoid, infraspinatus-teres minor, and subscapularis. Concurrent application of forces to the supraspinatus or the infraspinatusteres minro and subscapularis significantly reduced the required deltoid force over the range of motion studied by an average of 28 and 36%, respectively. The contributions of the rotator cuff muscles to abduction of the arm were greatest at low abduction angles (30 and 60°) and were insignificant by 120°. The infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis contribute significantly to abduction: their contibution was equal to that of the supraspinatus and, like the supraspinatus, they are most effective during the first 90° of abduction.     

Passive glenohumeral joint stabilization: A biomechanical study

Passive glenohumeral joint stability was tested in 10 cadaveric shoulder specimens, before and after venting of the intraarticulor space. Force-displacement diagrams were measured with anterior, posterior, and inferior excursion, in neutral position, in 90° of abduction, and in a combination of 90° of abduction and 90° of external rotation. Displacement at 50 Ns before venting averaged 11.17 mm posteriorly (SD = 6.48 mm), 7.15 mm anteriorly (SD = 5.51 mm), and 3.41 mm inferiorly (SD = 3.37 mm). Venting of the joint increased displacement by 47% anteriorly, 49% posteriorly, and 61 % inferiorly. In addition, mathematic model calculation was used to estimate the destabilizing forces at the glenohumeral joint during physiologic arm motion. This force approximated 970 N, cldarly more than passive stabilizers alone seem to be able to provide. It is therefore assumed that, in addition to passive joint stability, active stabilization plays a major role at the glenohumeral joint.     

Anatomy of the shoulder joint

The shoulder joint and its associated joints form one of the most complex joint systems of the human locomotor apparatus. Its large range of motion is made possible by the interplay of 5 joints: sternoclavicular-joint, acromioclavicular-joint, glenohumeral joint, thoracoscapular joint and subacromial joint. The rotator cuff works mostly as an active stabilizer of the shoulder joint. The supraspinatus muscle causes a compression of the humerus in the glenoid mainly, furthermore it effects synergistic the abduction with the delta muscle. On the basis of its lever-arm the supraspinatus works between 0 and 60 degrees abduction the most optimally. With failure of the supraspinatus, the deltoideus can almost completely take its function. The inferior glenohumeral ligament-complex is the main passive stabilizer. The blood supply of the humerus head is ensured mainly by the a. circumflexa anterior and its rami ascendents, by several small branches from the a. circumflexa posterior and over intraosseous anastomoses. The most important vessel of the cap is the intraosseous a. arcuata out of the ramus ascendens lateralis of the a. circumflexa anterior.     

Effects of the glenoid labrum and glenohumeral abduction on stability of the shoulder joint through concavity-compression : an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Although the glenohumeral joint is the most mobile articulation of the human body, it is known to exhibit ball-and-socket kinematics. Compression into the glenoid labral concavity keeps the humeral head centered. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of joint position on glenohumeral stability through concavity-compression. METHODS: Ten cadaveric shoulders were tested. The glenoid was mounted horizontally onto a six-component load-cell while the humerus was clamped to a vertically unconstrained slide. An x-y stage translated the load-cell with the glenoid underneath the humeral head in eight different directions. Compressive loads of 20, 40, and 60 N were applied. The tests were repeated in 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of glenohumeral abduction with and without the labrum. Relative translations between the glenoid and the humeral head and the forces resisting translation were recorded. Then the stability ratio, defined as the peak translational force divided by the applied compressive force, was calculated. RESULTS: The average stability ratio was higher in the hanging-arm position than it was in glenohumeral abduction. The highest stability ratio was detected in the inferior direction (59.8% 7.7%) when the labrum was intact and in the superior direction (53.3% 7.9%) when the labrum had been resected. Under both conditions, the anterior direction was associated with the lowest stability ratio (32.0% 4.4% with the labrum and 30.4% 4.1% without the labrum). Resection of the glenoid labrum resulted in an average decrease in the stability ratio of 9.6% 1.7%. With increasing compressive load, the average stability ratio slightly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Glenohumeral stability through concavity-compression was greater in the hanging-arm position than it was in glenohumeral abduction. The average contribution of the labrum to glenohumeral stability through concavity-compression was approximately 10%, about one-half of the value previously reported. With the labrum intact, the glenohumeral joint was most stable in the inferior direction. Without the labrum, it was most stable in the superior direction. Under both conditions, it was least stable in the anterior direction. Glenohumeral joint stability through concavity-compression decreases with higher compressive loads.     

Biomechanical tests for type II SLAP lesions of the shoulder joint before and after arthroscopic repair

Superior labral anterior-to-posterior (SLAP) lesions can cause shoulder pain partly by causing glenohumeral instability. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a simulated type II SLAP lesion and subsequent repair on glenohumeral translation of the vented shoulder. In eight cadaver joints, a robotic/UFS testing system was used to measure joint translation by applying an anterior, posterior, or inferior load of 50 N to each shoulder. The "apprehension tests" for anterior and posterior instability were simulated by applying an anterior load of 50 N with an external rotation torque of 3 Nm or a posterior load of 50 N with an internal rotation torque of 3 Nm. Each loading condition was applied at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction with a constant joint compressive load (44 N) to the intact, simulated SLAP lesion, and repaired shoulder. Repair of the type II SLAP was then performed by placing a Suretac through the labrum both anterior and posterior to the biceps anchor and testing was repeated. ANOVA was used to compare translation of the intact joint, the joint after the type II SLAP lesion had been simulated, and after repair. At 30 degrees of abduction, anterior translation of the intact vented shoulder joint from anterior loading was 18.7+/-8.5 mm and increased to 26.2+/-6.5 mm after simulation of the type II SLAP lesion ( p< or =0.05). The arthroscopic repair did not restore anterior translation (23.9+/-8.6 mm) to the same degree as the intact joint ( p> or =0.05). At 60 degrees of abduction, anterior translation of 16.6+/-9.6mm in the intact joint was not significantly increased at 19.4+/-10.1 after simulation of the type II SLAP lesion ( p=0.0527). AP loading also resulted in inferior translation. At 30 degrees of abduction it was 3.8+/-4.0 mm in the intact joint and increased to 8.5+/-5.4 mm after the type II SLAP lesion ( p< or =0.05. After repair the inferior translation decreased significantly to 6.7+/-5.3 mm ( p< or =0.05). Although inferior translations were less at 60 degrees of abduction, results were similar to those at 30 degrees after repair. There were no significant increases in translation after SI/AP combined external rotation torque or posterior-anterior combined internal rotation torque loading.In this study the repair of a type II SLAP lesion only partially restored translations to the same degree as an intact vented shoulder joint. Therefore, improved repair techniques or an anteroinferior capsulolabral procedure in addition to the type II SLAP lesion repair might be needed to restore normal joint function.