Evolution du bloc neuromusculaire sous atracurium. Comparaison avec l''alcuronium

Using a standardized anaesthetic protocol, the continuous monitoring of the twitch height after a 0.1 Hz stimulus was used to follow the evolution of curarization following injection of either atracurium (0.6 mg . kg-1) or alcuronium (0.2 mg . kg-1). The maximum twitch height inhibition was always greater than 99% of the control value and occurred after 107 +/- 50 s with atracurium (n = 30) and 172 +/- 120 s for alcuronium (n = 30) (p less than 0.02). Although surgical stage of muscular relaxation (twitch height less than 25% of reference value) was the same for both drugs (55 +/- 15 min for alcuronium versus 52 +/- 10 min for atracurium; n = 30 for both groups), the clinical duration (spontaneous restoration of twitch height to 90% of the reference value) was significantly longer (p less than 0.005) for alcuronium: 89 +/- 20 min (n = 10) versus 62 +/- 9 min for atracurium (n = 10). The spontaneous return to normal of the train of four was also significantly longer (p less than 0.001) for alcuronium: 118 +/- 23 min (n = 10) versus 69 +/- 7 min for atracurium (n = 10). The recovery index (the time required for twitch height to rise from 25% to 75%) was three times quicker (p less than 0.01) for atracurium (10 +/- 3 min; n = 10) than for alcuronium (30 +/- 13 min; n = 10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Administration of vecuronium, atracurium and pancuronium in divided doses: effect on onset and duration of action

The time to onset of neuromuscular block (as assessed by single twitch stimulation at 0.1 Hz) and the duration to 25% recovery of twitch height were measured after administration of vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1, atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1 or pancuronium 0.1 mg kg-1, administered either as a single bolus or in divided doses, 10% being administered 4 min prior to the remaining 90%. The patients were anaesthetized with thiopentone, nitrous oxide in oxygen and i.v. fentanyl. There was no significant difference between the single- and divided-dose groups, either in the onset times (2.8 and 2.9 min for vecuronium, 2.7 and 2.4 min for atracurium and 3.3 min each for pancuronium for single- and divided-dose groups, respectively) or the duration to 25% recovery of twitch height (35 and 29 min for vecuronium, 45 and 39 min for atracurium and 87 and 93 min for pancuronium for single- and divided-dose groups, respectively).     

Neostigmine and edrophonium as antagonists of atracurium and pancuronium

Edrophonium 0.5 mg/kg or neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg were administered to two groups of 30 patients each for antagonism of atracurium- or pancuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 25% single twitch recovery. Neuromuscular block was studied using both single twitch and train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation. The times to 100% single twitch recovery were significantly more rapid for patients receiving edrophonium (P less than 0.01) in both groups (atracurium and pancuronium); the TOF ratios were similar for atracurium, but for pancuronium they were greater after neostigmine than after edrophonium, and only at 25 min were these ratios similar. It is concluded that edrophonium in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg antagonizes neuromuscular blockade induced by atracurium, as does neostigmine in a dose of 0.04 mg/kg, but the former does not consistently antagonize neuromuscular blockade induced by pancuronium even at 25% of single twitch recovery.     

Comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effect of cisatracurium and atracurium on the larynx and the adductor pollicis

BACKGROUND: Cisatracurium unlike atracurium is devoid of histamine-induced cardiovascular effects and this alone would be the greatest advantage in replacing atracurium for the facilitation of tracheal intubation. On the other hand, 2 ED(95) doses of cisatracurium (100 micro g/kg) do not yield satisfactory intubating conditions such as those seen with equipotent doses of atracurium and therefore the recommended intubating dose of cisatracurium is 3 ED(95). To understand this discrepancy better, we evaluated the potency and onset of atracurium and cisatracurium directly at the larynx adductors in humans. METHODS: The study was conducted in 54 patients (ASA class I or II) undergoing peripheral surgery requiring general anesthesia. Cisatracurium 25-150 micro g/kg or atracurium 120-500 micro g/kg intravenous (i.v.) boluses doses were administered during anesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide, oxygen and fentanyl. Neuromuscular block was measured by electromyography (single twitch stimulation every 10 s) at the larynx and the adductor pollicis. The dose-response effect measured at both muscles included maximum neuromuscular blockade achieved (Emax), the time to maximum depression of twitch height (onset) and time to spontaneous recovery of the twitch height to 25%, 75% and 90% (T25, T75, T90) of control value. RESULT: The onset at the larynx was of 196 +/- 28 s after the 100 micro g/kg cisatracurium dose compared with 140 +/- 14 s after the 500 micro g/kg atracurium dose (P < 0.05). Emax at the larynx was 92 +/- 1% and 98 +/- 1% after 100 micro g/kg cisatracurium and 500 micro g/kg atracurium, respectively (P < 0.05). The time to onset of maximum suppression Emax = 100 +/- 0% after a 150 micro g/kg cisatracurium dose was 148 +/- 29 s. At the larynx, the ED(50) was 25 micro g/kg for cisatracurium and 180 micro g/kg for atracurium and the ED(95) was 87 micro g/kg for cisatracurium compared with 400 micro g/kg for atracurium. CONCLUSION: The slow onset time at the laryngeal muscles after cisatracurium can be explained by the higher potency as compared with atracurium.     

Effects of propofol and isoflurane on the neuromuscular block induced by atracurium]

Speed of onset, duration of action and recovery time for a bolus injection of atracurium were measured in two groups of patients. In group I anaesthesia considered of propofol, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture. The induction dose of propofol was 2 mg/kg-1 followed by an infusion of 9.0 mg/kg-1/h-1 for first half hour and 4.5 mg/Kg-1/h-1 subsequently. In group II anaesthesia consisted of isoflurane, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and oxygen mixture. Isoflurane was given upon clinical needs. Speed of onset, duration of action, and recovery time for atracurium were measured in the two groups. No statistically significant differences between speed of onset and duration of action between the two groups were found. The recovery period from T1 = 10% to T1 = 70% twitch response was considerably longer with isoflurane (25 min +/- 6) than with propofol (18 min +/- 3) (p less than 0.01). Results obtained suggest that for adequate relaxation during tracheal intubation smaller doses of atracurium are not needed during isoflurane than propofol administration. Because of the longer recovery period of residual neuromuscular blockade during isoflurane anaesthesia decreasing doses of atracurium and careful monitoring of twitch depression tension are also suggested.     

Atracurium and vecuronium: repeated bolus injection versus infusion.

The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of recovery from neuromuscular blockade after either atracurium or vecuronium given by intravenous infusion or by repeated injection. Four groups of 10 patients each were studied during nitrous oxide narcotic anesthesia. An initial intravenous dose of 2 x ED95 of either muscle relaxant was followed by an intravenous infusion started at 5% recovery of control twitch tension and adjusted for 95% block or by repeated injection of 0.6 x ED95 administered whenever twitch tension had returned to 25% of control. There were no significant differences between the maintenance doses required based on method of administration: atracurium repeated injection, 1.6 +/- 0.3 x ED95 h-1; atracurium infusion, 1.7 +/- 0.3 x ED95 h-1; vecuronium repeated injection, 1.8 +/- 0.5 x ED95 h-1; and vecuronium infusion, 1.6 +/- 0.4 x ED95 h-1. Nevertheless, differences of up to 20 min were noted in the recovery indices in the following order: atracurium repeated injection = atracurium infusion less than vecuronium repeated injection less than vecuronium infusion. A single dose of neostigmine (7 micrograms/kg) significantly reduced the recovery indices, thereby eliminating their differences.     

A comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects and reversibility of cisatracurium and atracurium

The neuromuscular blocking effects and the reversibility of cisatracurium 0.1 or 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ were compared with those of atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ during anaesthesia with propofol, nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four stimulation while recording the mechanomyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The block was either allowed to recover spontaneously or was antagonised with neostigmine 50 μgkg⁻¹ at 10% or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four. The median times to maximum block were 2.7, 2.2 and 1.5 min following cisatracurium 0.1 and 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹, respectively. After cisatracurium 0.1 mgkg⁻¹ had been given, the median time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.8 ('adequate recovery') was 74 min during spontaneous recovery, 48 min after reversal with neostigmine when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 10% of control and 50 min after reversal when the first twitch of the train-of-four had returned to 25% of control. These times for cisatracurium 0.15 mgkg⁻¹ and atracurium 0.5 mgkg⁻¹ were 90, 66 and 57 min and 75, 56 and 54 min, respectively. Administration of neostigmine significantly shortened the time to adequate recovery for both drugs but there were no significant differences in the case of either neuromuscular blocking drug between the groups of patients given neostigmine at 10 or 25% recovery of the first twitch of the train-of-four.     

Atracurium infusion in total intravenous anesthesia

The neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium given as a bolus dose (0.5 mg X kg-1) followed by a maintenance infusion was studied during two different anesthetic techniques. It has been reported that benzodiazepines interact with non-depolarising neuromuscular blockers. In this study no difference was found in the effect of atracurium given with conventional fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia when compared to total intravenous anesthesia using midazolam/alfentanil. More than 90% twitch depression was achieved after 123 and 137 s, respectively. Recovery time to 10% twitch height following the bolus dose was around 32 min. The dosage range for atracurium given by infusion (0.29-0.44 mg X kg-1 X h-1) was confirmed.     

Comparative study of vecuronium and atracurium at low doses in minor pediatric surgery under combined anesthesia]

To compare, the time of onset and time of recovery of muscular blockade after use of half doses of vecuronium and atracurium, we studied 18 children ASA I who were proposed for short lasting pediatric surgery and combined anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups: group V (n = 10) was treated with a single dose of 0.05 mg/kg of vecuronium and group A (n = 8) with 0.25 mg/kg of atracurium. Assessment of muscular relaxation was performed by measuring the electromyographic responses to a train of four stimuli applied to the cubital nerve at the level of the hypothenar eminence. We administered 0.02 mg/kg of atropine, 5 to 10 mg/kg of thiopental, and the muscular relaxing dose together with orotracheal intubation when the first stimulus of the train of four stimuli was blocked at 90% of its initial value (T90). Maintenance of the anesthetic level was performed with 50% of N2O-O2 without inhalational anesthetics. A caudal blockade was induced by 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine at 0.25%. We measured the following parameters of muscular relaxation: T90, T10 (time at which the 10% of the first stimulus reappears), T25 (time of clinical efficacy) and IR (index of recovery). Only 60% of patients (6 out of the 10 patients of vecuronium group and 5 out of the 8 subjects of atracurium group) achieved the T90. This occurred 2.5 +/- 0.7 min after vecuronium and 3.2 +/- 0.6 min after atracurium. T10 was 13.7 +/- 4.1 min for vecuronium and 13.3 +/- 4.1 min from atracurium. T25 occurred 18.2 +/- 6.5 min after vecuronium and 19.4 +/- 2.1 min for atracurium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Zuverlässigkeit und Dosisabhängigkeit des Train-of-Four count

The estimation of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular block using the train-of-four (TOF) count shows wide differences compared to the mechanomyographic measurement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of these differences. METHODS: 89 patients (ASA I-II) in 6 groups received general anesthesia with fentanyl, propofol and a single dose atracurium (150, 200, 250, 300, 450 and 600 microg/kg). Neuromuscular transmission was monitored by stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist with supramaximal TOF stimuli repeated every 15 s using a peripheral nerve stimulator. The isometric force contraction of the m. adductor pollicis was recorded. The height of T1 at reappearance of the second (T2) and fourth (T4) twitch was noted. Also noted was the time difference between the first reappearance of T4 and the 25% recovery of T1. Statistical significance of the results was calculated by the h-test of Kruskal and Wallis. Testing the reliability of the TOF count, a 95% interval of confidence was calculated RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the mean ages, heights and weights of the six groups. T2 and T4 re-appeared at 11+/-2% and 24+/-6% recovery of T1, respectively. Again, there were no significant differences between the six dose groups (Fig. 1). The time difference between the re-appearance of T4 and the 25% recovery was -1.0+/-2 (range: -5-3) minutes. The calculation of a 95% interval of confidence indicated a recovery between 14% and 33% at reappearance of T4, 25% recovery can be expected 5 min before to 3 min after reappearance of T4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At reappearance of T4, a recovery of neuromuscular block of 25% is missed only by 3 to 5 min during relaxation with atracurium. We consider this margin of error as unimportant for clinical use. More-over we were able to show that the TOF-count is not dose dependent.     

Does vecuronium accumulate in the renal transplant patient?

Twenty ASA physical status Class III patients undergoing cadaver renal transplantation were studied. After 90 per cent T1 recovery, as determined by train-of-four measurement, from 1.0 mg.kg-1 succinylcholine to facilitate tracheal intubation, nine patients received atracurium 0.25 mg.kg-1 (Group I) and 11 patients received vecuronium 0.05 mg.kg-1 (Group II) intravenously. The following measurements were made: time to maximum block onset (first dose Max), injection to start of recovery (start REC1), injection to 25 per cent T1 twitch recovery (REC 251), injection to 75 per cent T1 (REC 75(1], injection to 90 per cent T1 (REC 90(1] and time from 25-75 per cent recovery T1 (REC 25-75(1]. Maximum blockade (Max block 1) was also measured. At 90 per cent T1 recovery, if time permitted, an identical dose of the appropriate relaxant was administered. Time from second dose to onset of maximum block (second dose Max) and 90 per cent recovery after second dose (REC 90(2] were then measured. At the conclusion of surgery, neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 2.5 mg and glycopyrrolate 0.5 mg. One way ANOVA was performed to determine significance between the groups and a p less than 0.05 was considered significant. A paired t test was also performed between REC 90(1) and REC 90(2) for atracurium and vecuronium respectively. A p less than 0.05 was again considered significant. Measurement of first dose Max, start REC1, REC25(1), REC 75(1), REC 90(1), REC 25-75(1) and Max block 1 revealed no difference between the patients receiving an initial dose of atracurium and those receiving vecuronium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mivacurium chloride—a comparative profile

Mivacurium is a new nondepolarizing muscle relaxant of the benzylisoquinoline type. Its short duration of action is due to rapid breakdown by plasma cholinesterase. The dose of mivacurium which produces 95% inhibition of twitch response (ED₉₅) is between 60 and 80 μg/kg. Thus, mivacurium is 0.8 times and four times as potent as vecuronium and atracurium, respectively. With 2–3×ED₉₅, tracheal intubation can be accomplished within 2.5 min of intravenous injection. The ensuing DUR25% (time from injection to 25% recovery of control twitch tension) is twice as long as with suxamethonium and about half as long as with equipotent doses of atracurium or vecuronium. For muscle relaxation during long surgical procedures, mivacurium has been used as a continuous infusion. The average 6-min recovery index after infusion of mivacurium is particularly favourable for flexible control of muscle paralysis, whereas the recovery indices after infusion of atracurium or vecuronium are 15–30 min. In conclusion, mivacurium will close the pharmacodynamic gap between suxamethonium and the nondepolarizing muscle relaxants of intermediate duration of action. It will probably also be a suitable alternative to suxamethonium in elective cases.     

Atracurium infusions in major ophthalmic surgery

Fifteen patients who were undergoing major ophthalmic surgery were anaesthetized using controlled ventilation with nitrous oxide, oxygen, midazolam and fentanyl after induction with thiopentone. Each was then given a bolus dose of 0.6 mg kg-1 atracurium followed immediately by an infusion of the drug at the rate of 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1, neuromuscular function being monitored throughout. Even slight movement can jeopardize the success of this type of surgery but good control of neuromuscular blockade was achieved without inhalational supplementation. The mean duration of the atracurium infusion was 118 min (range 30-247 min). The mean time from stopping the infusion to recovery of the first twitch of the train of four (TOF) to 20% was 25 min (range 11-44 min). Atropine (1.2 mg) and 5.0 mg neostigmine were then given in divided doses and a rapid and complete recovery was achieved. This technique can be used safely even in bad-risk patients but the infusion should be discontinued about 25 min before the end of surgery.     

VECURONIUM AND ATRACURIUM IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL FAILURE: A Comparative Study

Twenty patients with end-stage renal failure, undergoing kidneytransplantation, were assigned randomly to receive either vecuroniumor atracurium under evoked twitch tension control. The cumulative-dosetechnique was used to obtain 95% twitch depression (vecuronium:initial bolus 15 µg kg^–1, increments 6 µgkg^–1; atracurium: initial bolus 100 µg kg^–1,increments 40 µg kg^–1). Using ED₉₅ values derivedfrom the log-probit dose-response curves, vecuronium was 4.6times more potent than atracurium. The durations of action ofthe initial cumulativedoses (from end of injection of the lastincrement to 25% recovery) were 11.1± 3.3 min for vecuroniumand 16.2±3.9 min for atracurium (P < 0.05). In termsof duration of action of the maintenance doses (vecuronium one-quarterof the total incremental dose; atracurium one-third) some cumulationwas observed with vecuronium (interaction time x treatment;cumulation ratio 1.46 ±0.31 v. 0.98±0.10 for atracurium,P< 0.001). After 2 h of surgery, the mean recovery times(25% to 75% twitch height) did not differ (18.5±2.8 minand 16.7±4.4 min). It is concluded that vecuronium mightbe less safe than atracurium in patients with end-stage renalfailure undergoing prolonged operations.     

Tactile evaluation of train-of-four count as an indicator of reliability of antagonism of vecuronium- or atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Recent evidence suggests that edrophonium is not the agent of choice to reverse profound neuromuscular blockade but remains an efficacious drug when the level of neuromuscular blockade to be antagonized is modest. We studied 90 healthy adults in an attempt to address the questions: 1) How much variability in such neuromuscular parameters as single twitch height and the train-of-four (TOF) fade ratio (T4/T1) exist when the TOF count first returns to four palpable responses? 2) Is edrophonium a reliable antagonist at this measured point of recovery? 3) What is the optimal dose of edrophonium needed to produce prompt (less than 10 min) and satisfactory (T4/T1 greater than 0.7) reversal when the fourth response of the thumb to indirect TOF stimulation just becomes palpable? Patients were given a bolus atracurium or vecuronium (n = 45 in each group) followed by an iv infusion sufficient to maintain single twitch as measured by electromyography at 10-15% of control values. At the end of surgery, the infusion was terminated and spontaneous recovery was allowed to begin. Once the tactile TOF count was four, edrophonium 0.3, 0.5, or 0.75 mg/kg was administered. At a count-of-four the first twitch averaged 37% of control (+/- 8.5% standard deviation; pooled data from all groups) and the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.14 +/- 0.049. After atracurium neuromuscular blockade, edrophonium 0.3 mg/kg produced adequate antagonism in 10 min. At this time the mean T4/T1 ratio was 0.79 +/- 0.07 and the lowest observed value was 0.67. Increasing the edrophonium dose to 0.75 mg/kg accelerated recovery by 4-5 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the Neuromuscular Blocking Effect of Atracurium and Vecuronium on the Adductor Pollicis and the Geniohyoid Muscle in Humans

Background: Residual paralysis of suprahyoid muscles may occur when the adductor pollicis response has completely recovered after the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent. The response of the geniohyoid muscle to intubating doses of muscle relaxants is evaluated and compared to that of adductor pollicis.

Methods: Sixteen patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were given 5-7 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 thiopental and 2 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 fentanyl intravenously for induction of anesthesia. Eight (half) patients then received 0.5 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 atracurium, and the other eight received 0.1 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 vecuronium. The evoked response (twitch height, TH) of the adductor pollicis was monitored by measuring the integrated electromyographic response (AP EMG) on one limb and the mechanical response, using a force transducer (AP force), on the other. The activity of geniohyoid muscle (GH EMG) was measured using submental percutaneous electrodes. The following variables were measured: maximal TH depression; onset time for neuromuscular blockade to 50%, 90%, and maximal TH depression (OT50, OT90, and OTmax); times between administration of neuromuscular blocking agent and TH recovery to 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90% of control; and time for return of train-of-four ratio to return to 0.7.

Results: The principal findings were (1) OTmax was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter for geniohyoid than for adductor pollicis after either atracurium or vecuronium (OTmax was 216, 256, and 175 s for AP force, AP EMG, and GH EMG, with atracurium and 181, 199, and 144 s with vecuronium, respectively), and (2) the evoked EMG of geniohyoid recovered at the same speed as the EMG of adductor pollicis after an intubating dose of atracurium or vecuronium (recovery of TH to 75% of control at 50, 48, 42 min with AP force, AP EMG, and GH EMG with atracurium and 46, 45, and 42 min with vecuronium, respectively).     

Pharmacodynamics of vecuronium and atracurium in the obese surgical patient

The effect of obesity on the duration of action of the nondepolarizing muscle relaxants atracurium and vecuronium was studied in 28 neurosurgical patients. In obese patients given vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg), the time to go from 5 to 25% of recovery of twitch response was statistically significantly longer (14.6 +/- 7 minutes, mean +/- SD) than it was in nonobese control patients (6.9 +/- 2 minutes). Similarly, with vecuronium times for recovery from 25 to 75% were longer (33 +/- 15 minutes) in obese patients than in control patients (13.2 +/- 2 minutes), as was time to 75% recovery, 82 +/- 30 minutes in obese patients, 50 +/- 9 minutes in controls. In contrast, obese patients given atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) exhibited no difference in recovery indexes or recovery times when compared to control patients of normal weight. The prolonged duration of action of vecuronium in obese patients is most likely related to impaired hepatic clearance and/or an overdose effect with recovery occurring during the distribution phase. That the duration of action of atracurium is not prolonged in the obese is believed due to this relaxant's not depending on organ function for elimination.     

Benzodiazepines and neuromuscular blocking drugs in patients

The interaction between four benzodiazepines (diazepam, lorazepam, lormetazepam and midazolam) and two nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs (vecuronium and atracurium) was investigated in 113 patients during general anaesthesia. Neuromuscular function was monitored by recording the mechanical twitch tension of the adductor pollicis muscle of the thumb in response to ulnar nerve stimulation with single supramaximal stimuli of 0.2 ms at 0.1 Hz. In the first group of patients a benzodiazepine (diazepam 20 mg, lorazepam 5 mg, lormetazepam 2 mg or midazolam 15 mg), was injected i.v. 15 min before a single bolus of vecuronium 45 micrograms kg-1. In the second group of patients suxamethonium 1 mg kg-1 was given for endotracheal intubation, and 30 min later the patients received atracurium 200 micrograms kg-1. Fifteen min before injection of atracurium one of the same benzodiazepines as in the first group was injected i.v. Comparisons were made with control patients receiving thiopentone. Neither benzodiazepine caused significant potentiation of neuromuscular blocking agents in comparison with control. With midazolam, however, the duration to 25% and to 75% recovery of the twitch height after vecuronium was significantly longer than with diazepam. The time to 25% recovery of the twitch height after atracurium was significantly longer in patients receiving midazolam than in those receiving diazepam. The recovery index was not influenced by the four benzodiazepines.     

Atracurium in the myasthenic patient

The use of the new competitive muscle relaxant, atracurium, is described in five myasthenic patients presenting for thymectomy. With an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg, that is approximately one-fifth of that normally used, and incremental doses of 0.02-0.04 mg/kg, satisfactory clinical conditions were achieved. Neuromuscular function was monitored throughout using the train-of-four mechanical twitch response, and residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed satisfactorily at the end of the procedure with neostigmine 5.0 mg. A marked increase in the magnitude of the first twitch of the train-of-four to greater than control levels, accompanied by pronounced fade, was found on reversal. In reduced dosage and with careful neuromuscular monitoring, atracurium is safe to use in the myasthenic patient.     

Clinical Reports

Succinylcholine 2–5 mg or atracurium 10–15 mg were given on five separate occasions to a 24-year-old, 64 kg woman homozygous for atypical plasma cholinesterase who was undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Atracurium blockade was reversed with atropine, 0.6 mg and edrophonium, 35 mg. Train-of-four stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. Doses producing 90 per cent first twitch blockade were 2.5 and 15 mg for succinylcholine and atracurium respectively. The onset of action was 6 min for both relaxants, and time to 90 per cent first twitch recovery was 20 min for succinylcholine and 16 min for the atracurium-edrophonium combination. It is concluded that the use of atracurium in these patients does not offer marked advantages over small doses of succinylcholine.