Prevalence of Masked Hypertension in Subjects Treated with Antihypertensive Drugs as Assessed by Morning versus Evening Home Blood Pressure Measurements: the J-HOME study

To investigate the relationship between morning and evening home blood pressure (BP) measurements to make a diagnosis of masked hypertension, we collected information on the characteristics of 3,303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive medication in Japan using a physician, self-administered questionnaire. All patients were asked to measure their home BP once every morning and once every evening for two weeks. Morning and evening home BP values of each patient were defined as the average of all morning and all evening home BP values, respectively. The mean BP values of all study subjects were 142.8/80.6 mmHg for office BP, 139.8/81.8 mmHg for morning home BP, 133.7/76.9 mmHg for evening home BP, and 136.8/79.3 mmHg for the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Masked hypertension was defined as an office BP < 140/90 mmHg and a home BP > or = 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of masked hypertension diagnosed using morning home BP (23.1%) was higher than that diagnosed by evening home BP (14.7%); the prevalence was 19.0% when diagnosed using the average of the morning and evening home BPs. Among the 1,386 patients with a normal office BP, the diagnosis of masked hypertension based on morning and evening home BP values differed in 28.8% of patients for systolic BP and 20.9% for diastolic BP (kappa coefficient = 0.43). The present study showed that the prevalence of masked hypertension was underestimated when the diagnosis of masked hypertension was made on the basis of evening home BP.     

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure values. METHODS: The study population consisted of 3303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive treatment in Japan. Information on the characteristics of the patients was collected by a physician's self-administrated questionnaire. The office blood pressure value was calculated as the average of the four readings in two visits. All patients were asked to measure their blood pressure once every morning and once every evening. In the study, we included patients with at least three measurements in the morning and in the evening, respectively. The average of all home blood pressure values was taken as the home blood pressure value. RESULTS: The mean value of home systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 136.8/79.3 mmHg, and the mean value of office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8/80.6 mmHg. Of the 3303 patients, 758 (23.0%) had controlled hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 628 (19.0%) had masked uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 640 (19.4%) had treated white-coat hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg), and 1277 (38.7%) had uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Treated white-coat hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were often observed in clinical settings. Physicians need to understand the prevalence of such patients to prevent inadequate diagnosis and treatment in them.     

Detection of masked hypertension by home blood pressure measurement: is the number of measurements an important issue?

BACKGROUND: Office blood pressure (OBP) and home blood pressure (HBP) enable the identification of patients with masked hypertension. Masked hypertension is defined by normal OBP and high HBP and is known as a pejorative cardiovascular risk factor. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate in the SHEAF study the influence of the number of office or home blood pressure measurements on the classification of patients as masked hypertensives. METHODS: Patients with OBP <140/90 mmHg (mean of six values: three measurements at two separate visits, V1 and V2) and HBP >135/85 mmHg (mean of all valid measurements performed over a 4-day period) were the masked hypertensive reference group. The consistency of the classification was evaluated by using five definitions of HBP values (mean of the 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 first measurements) and two definitions of OBP values (mean of three measurements at V1 and mean of three measurements at V2). RESULTS: Among the 4939 treated hypertensives included in the SHEAF study, 463 (9.4%) were classified as masked hypertensives (reference group). By decreasing the number of office or home measurements, the prevalence of masked hypertension ranged from 8.9-12.1%. The sensitivity of the classification ranged from 94-69% therefore 6-31% of the masked hypertensives were not detected. The specificity ranged from 98-94% therefore 1-6% of patients were wrongly classified as masked hypertensives. CONCLUSION: A limited number of home and office BP measurements allowed the detection of masked hypertension with a high specificity and a low sensitivity. A sufficient number of measurements (three measurements at two visits for OBP and three measurements in the morning and in the evening over 2 days for HBP) are required to diagnose masked hypertension.     

Correlation of Repeated Measurements of Home Blood Pressure on One Occasion and Diagnosis of Hypertension: Study by Measurement over Seven Consecutive Days

In spite of the recent recognition of the usefulness of home blood pressure (BP) measurement, there are no clear guidelines for which measurements should be used for clinical evaluation. Therefore, the present study examined the correlation of repeated measurements of home BP on one occasion and the diagnosis of hypertension (HT) or normotension (NT). Home BP was measured with 700 volunteers aged 20 years or older (468 male and 232 female, mean age 40.6 years) in a sitting position three times each in the morning and evening for seven consecutive days. Excluding the measurements on the first day, the mean values were calculated for the first measurement (group A), second measurement (group B), the mean of the first and second measurements (group C), and the mean of the second and third measurements (group D). The correlation with the frequency of diagnosis of HT (≥135/85 mmHg) and NT (<125/80 mmHg) was studied. Home BP in the morning and evening were both highest in group A (morning: 122.1 ±0.6 (SEM)/75.9 ±0.4 mmHg, evening: 120.4 ±0.6/71.8 ±0.4 mmHg) and lowest in group D (morning: 119.5 ±0.6 / 75.2 ±0.4 mmHg, evening: 117.5 ±0.6/70.6 ±0.4 mmHg). Using morning home BP, HT was diagnosed more often in group A (27.4%) than in group D (24.7%), with a lower frequency of NT diagnosis (55.7% vs. 61.7%; p?=?0.06). With regard to the diagnosis made from evening home BP, HT was diagnosed more often and NT was diagnosed less often in group A (HT/NT: 18.4%/61.4%) than in group D (13.7%/68.0%), with statistical significance (p?=?0.02). In conclusion, when the clinical diagnosis was made from seven-day home BP, the diagnosis of HT was made more frequently and NT diagnosis was made less frequently using the first measurement than the mean of the second and third measurements. This trend was more pronounced when diagnosis was made from evening home BP.     

Correlation of repeated measurements of home blood pressure on one occasion and diagnosis of hypertension: study by measurement over seven consecutive days

In spite of the recent recognition of the usefulness of home blood pressure (BP) measurement, there are no clear guidelines for which measurements should be used for clinical evaluation. Therefore, the present study examined the correlation of repeated measurements of home BP on one occasion and the diagnosis of hypertension (HT) or normotension (NT). Home BP was measured with 700 volunteers aged 20 years or older (468 male and 232 female, mean age 40.6 years) in a sitting position three times each in the morning and evening for seven consecutive days. Excluding the measurements on the first day, the mean values were calculated for the first measurement (group A), second measurement (group B), the mean of the first and second measurements (group C), and the mean of the second and third measurements (group D). The correlation with the frequency of diagnosis of HT (>/=135/85 mmHg) and NT (<125/80 mmHg) was studied. Home BP in the morning and evening were both highest in group A (morning: 122.1 +/-0.6 (SEM)/75.9 +/-0.4 mmHg, evening: 120.4 +/-0.6/71.8 +/-0.4 mmHg) and lowest in group D (morning: 119.5 +/-0.6 / 75.2 +/-0.4 mmHg, evening: 117.5 +/-0.6/70.6 +/-0.4 mmHg). Using morning home BP, HT was diagnosed more often in group A (27.4%) than in group D (24.7%), with a lower frequency of NT diagnosis (55.7% vs. 61.7%; p = 0.06). With regard to the diagnosis made from evening home BP, HT was diagnosed more often and NT was diagnosed less often in group A (HT/NT: 18.4%/61.4%) than in group D (13.7%/68.0%), with statistical significance (p = 0.02). In conclusion, when the clinical diagnosis was made from seven-day home BP, the diagnosis of HT was made more frequently and NT diagnosis was made less frequently using the first measurement than the mean of the second and third measurements. This trend was more pronounced when diagnosis was made from evening home BP.     

Clinical significance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Evaluation of severity of hypertension, efficacy of treatment and effects on nighttime blood pressure

Blood pressure (BP) obtained by the physician in his office and ambulatory BP recorded every hour throughout 24 hours with a noninvasive automated BP monitoring device were compared in 10 normotensives and 162 hypertensives. Casual BPs significantly correlated with averages in ambulatory BPs (ABPs) throughout the whole day, day (7 am - 10 pm) and night (0-5 am). However, it was noted that 6 of 10 normotensives and all of the moderate to severe hypertensives had ABPs of more than 150/90 mmHg at least once during the 24-hour period. The incidence of ABPs greater than 150/90 mmHg among all readings was higher in untreated and treated hypertensives with diastolic BPs in the office of more than 105 mmHg, and, when checked along with the clock time, higher not only in the morning but also in the evening. On the other hand, one-third or one-fifth of treated hypertensives with diastolic office BPs less than 90 mmHg or between 90 and 105 mmHg respectively had ABPs less than 150/90 mmHg throughout the whole day. When the effect of nicardipine (60 mg, t.i.d.) or slow-release nifedipine (27.3 +/- 3.0 mg, b.i.d.) on minimum BP during the night was analyzed, long-acting nifedipine decreased BP throughout the night to levels not significantly different from normotensive controls, whereas short-acting nicardipine did not affect nighttime BPs. These results suggest that simple ABP monitoring throughout the day gives us useful information to evaluate the severity of hypertension and the efficacy of antihypertensive medication as well as to avoid overtreatment with long-acting hypotensive agents resulting in a great fall in BP during sleep.     

Reproducibility of masked hypertension determined from morning and evening home blood pressure measurements over a 6-month period.

Recently, the existence of so-called masked hypertension has attracted attention. In this study, the reproducibility of masked hypertension determined from morning and evening home blood pressure measurements was examined over a 6-month period. Home blood pressure measurements were taken consecutively for 7 days in volunteers at a company in 2002 and again in 2003. The 503 Japanese subjects (329 male, 174 female, mean age: 39.4 years), who were not taking antihypertensive drugs, were asked to measure their home blood pressure three times every morning and three times every evening. We defined casual blood pressure > or =140 (systolic) or > or =90 (diastolic) mmHg and home blood pressure > or =135 or > or =85 mmHg as hypertension. We also defined normotension as <140 and <90 mmHg in casual blood pressure and <135 and <85 mmHg in home blood pressure. We examined the reproducibility of four blood pressure categories (normotension, hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and masked hypertension) over a 6-month period. When measured in morning home blood pressure, the reproducibility of masked hypertension (59.1%) was significantly higher than that of white-coat hypertension (25.0%) and similar to that of hypertension (67.6%). However, the reproducibility of masked hypertension (23.5%) was similar to that of white-coat hypertension (32.0%) and significantly lower than that of hypertension (66.7%) when determined using evening home blood pressure. The concordances in the four blood pressure categories between the two periods were 0.582 (kappa coefficient) and 0.463 when determined using morning and evening home blood pressure data, respectively. In conclusion, the reproducibility of masked hypertension over a 6-month period was moderate in an urban Japanese population when evaluated by morning home blood pressure.     

Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure

In the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study, office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) values were measured contemporaneously between 1990 and 1993 in a large population sample (n=2051). Cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV death certificates were collected over the next 148 months, which allowed us to assess the prognostic value of selective and combined elevation in these 3 BPs over a long follow-up. There were 69 CV and 233 all-cause deaths. Compared with subjects with normal office and 24-hour BP, the hazard ratio for CV death showed a progressive increase in those with a selective office BP elevation (white-coat hypertension), a selective 24-hour BP elevation (masked hypertension), and elevation in both office and 24-hour BP. This was the case also when the above conditions were identified by office versus home BP values. Selective elevation in home versus ambulatory BP or vice versa also carried an increased risk. There was indeed a progressive increase in both CV and all-cause mortality risk from subjects in whom office, home, and ambulatory BP were all normal to those in whom 1, 2, or all 3 BPs were elevated, regardless of which BP was considered. The trends remained significant after adjustment for age and gender, as well as, in most instances, after further adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension, both when identified by office and ambulatory or by office and home BPs, are not prognostically innocent. Indeed, each BP elevation (office, home, or ambulatory) carries an increase in risk mortality that adds to that of the other BP elevations.     

Prevalence and mechanism of masked hypertension: the ol'mesures survey

RATIONALE: Masked hypertension (MH) and uncontrolled hypertension (UCH) have both bad prognosis. The influence of measurement circumstances on MH prevalence and reproducibility are little known. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and reproducibility of MH after excluding confusing factors [method and time of blood pressure (BP) measurement, antihypertensive treatment] by a standardization procedure. METHODS: 2189 hypertensive patients (61+/- 12 years, men 57%) having been treated in monotherapy by an angiotensin II receptor inhibitor for at least 8 weeks Were evaluated in a French multicenter prospective observational survey. Three BP successive office measurements were performed by the GPs during 2 visits (V) at similar times 13 +/- 9 days apart (BP: V1 149 +/- 19 / 85 +/- 11 mmHg, V2 145 +/- 19/83 +/- 11 mmHg) and home BP self-measurements (HBPM) were performed morning and evening for 3 consecutive days (HBPM morning + evening : n=18 +/- 1; 142 +/- 16/81 +/- 9 mmHg) and at the time of the visit (daytime HBPM: n=9 +/- 1; 140 +/- 16/80 +/- 10 mmHg) by the patients (Omron-705CP). RESULTS: [table: see text]. CONCLUSION: the observed MH prevalence is similar to previous published studies and is independent of: treatment, BP measurement methods, measurements frequency and HBPM time but it depends on office BP values. Consequently, its reproducibility is directly dependent of the quality of office BP measurements.     

Home blood pressure measurements associated with better blood pressure control: the J-HOME study

The usefulness of self-measurements of blood pressure (BP) at home (home BP measurements) in hypertensive patients has been reported by many studies. Several national guidelines recommend the use of home BP measurements to achieve better hypertension control. The objective of this study was to clarify the association between home BP measurements and hypertension treatment among 2363 essential hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs. Compared to the 543 (23.0%) patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the 1820 (77.0%) patients who had taken home BP measurements were significantly older, included a higher proportion of males, included a higher proportion with a family history of hypertension, took a greater number of antihypertensive drugs and alpha blockers and took antihypertensive drugs more often in the evening. Home BP measurements were associated with significantly better control of home and office BP levels. Compared to patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the adjusted odds ratios for good control of morning home BPs, evening home BPs and office BPs in patients who had taken home BP measurements were 1.46 (95% confidential interval (CI) 1.33-1.57), 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.47) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.37), respectively. Home BP measurements were associated with good hypertensive management. Our findings suggest that it is important that physicians recommend home BP measurements to their patients.     

Sleep Blood Pressure Self‐Measured at Home as a Novel Determinant of Organ Damage: Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J‐HOP) Study

To study whether sleep blood pressure (BP) self‐measured at home is associated with organ damage, the authors analyzed the data of 2562 participants in the J‐HOP study who self‐measured sleep BP using a home BP monitoring (HBPM) device, three times during sleep (2 am , 3 am , 4 am ), as well as the home morning and evening BPs. The mean sleep home systolic BPs (SBPs) were all correlated with urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), maximum carotid intima‐media thickness, and plasma N‐terminal pro‐hormone pro–brain‐type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) (all P<.001). After controlling for clinic SBP and home morning and evening SBPs, associations of home sleep SBP with UACR, LVMI, and baPWV remained significant (all P<.008). Even in patients with home morning BP <135/85 mm Hg, 27% exhibited masked nocturnal hypertension with home sleep SBP ≥120 mm Hg and had higher UACR and NTproBNP. Masked nocturnal hypertension, which is associated with advanced organ damage, remains unrecognized by conventional HBPM.     

Morning hypertension: the strongest independent risk factor for stroke in elderly hypertensive patients.

Stroke occurs most frequently in the morning hours, but the impact of the morning blood pressure (BP) level on stroke risk has not been fully investigated in hypertensives. We studied stroke prognosis in 519 older hypertensives in whom ambulatory BP monitoring was performed, and who were followed prospectively. During an average duration of 41 months (range: 1-68 months), 44 stroke events occurred. The morning systolic BP (SBP) was the strongest independent predictor for stroke events among clinic, 24-h, awake, sleep, evening, and pre-awake BPs, with a 10 mmHg increase in morning SBP corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 1.44 (p<0.0001). The average of the morning and evening SBP (Av-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.41, p=0.0001), and the difference between the morning and evening SBP (Di-ME-SBP; 10 mmHg increase: RR=1.24, p=0.0025) were associated with stroke risks independently of each other. The RR of morning hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > or = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP > or = 20 mmHg) vs. sustained hypertension (Av-ME-SBP > = 135 mmHg and Di-ME-SBP < or = 20 mmHg) for stoke events was 3.1 after controlling for other risk factors (p=0.01). In conclusion, morning hypertension is the strongest independent predictor for future clinical stroke events in elderly hypertensive patients, and morning and evening BPs should be monitored in the home as a first step in the treatment of hypertensive patients.     

Lack of adequate blood pressure control in the morning and evening periods in medicated hypertensive patients considered to be controlled in the office.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In hypertensive patients tight blood pressure (BP) control during the critical morning and evening periods may be relevant for preventing cardiovascular events, which most frequently occur at these times of the day. METHODS: In a prospective study we evaluated 24h ambulatory BP (ABP) values (24h, daytime, nighttime, morning period between 6-10 am and evening period between 6-10 pm), in 103 hypertensive patients (HTs), aged between 18-79 years, considered to be controlled in the office in the previous two months (office BP < 140/90 mmHg, 2 x 3 readings, before taking medication), who were being treated with antihypertensive drugs taken once daily in the morning. Based on ABP data, HTs were considered to have good BP control if daytime BP values were < 135/85 mmHg, < 133.1/85.4 mmHg during the morning period, and < 138.1/89.3 mmHg during the evening period. Otherwise control of ABP was considered poor. These limits correspond to the upper 95% confidence limits of BP calculated for each period in a normotensive control population of 210 subjects age-matched to the HTs. RESULTS: Of the 103 HTs, 39 were under monotherapy and the remaining 64 on combination regimens (34 with two drugs, 29 with three and one with four). Based on ABP data of the 103 HTs, poor ABP control was observed in 36 (35%) in the morning period, in 24 (23%) in the evening period and in 29 (28%) for daytime BP values. ABP values during both the morning and evening periods correlated significantly with daytime values (r = 0.72 and r = 0.89 respectively, p < 0.01) but not with office values. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of treated HTs who are considered to be controlled in the office present abnormally high ABP levels, particularly in the critical early morning period, but also during the evening and throughout the daytime period.     

Role of blood pressure monitoring in non-pharmacological management of hypertension

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure (BP) measurement appear to be useful in the assessment of the effects of non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension because they can detect small changes in BP without observer bias. We studied the effects of various lifestyle modifications using ABPM and home BP measurement in Japanese patients with hypertension. Weight reduction by a hypocaloric diet (average 4 kg) was associated with decreases in 24-h BP (10/4 mmHg) as well as casual BP (9/6 mmHg). The reductions in daytime and night-time BPs were comparable. The effects of daily walking without weight loss on office, home, and 24-h BPs were 2-3/1-2 mmHg. The changes in home and 24-h BPs were more significant than those in office BP. A low-salt diet (25 mmol/day versus 250 mmol/day) decreased 24-h BP by 9/4 mmHg. This hypotensive effect was observed throughout the day. Potassium supplementation (64 mmol/day) decreased office, home and 24-h BPs by 3-4/1-2 mmHg. The changes in home and 24-h BPs were highly significant compared with office BP. Supplementation of magnesium (20 mmol/day) also reduced those BPs significantly. However, the effects of calcium supplementation (25 mmol/day) were small (1-2/1 mmHg) and were significant only for home BP. Alcohol restriction for 4 weeks decreased daytime BP by 3/2 mmHg but increased night-time BP by 4/2 mmHg. Average 24-h BP did not change. Smoking cessation lowered daytime BP without affecting night-time BP. Monitoring of 24-h BP and home BP can detect small changes in BP produced by lifestyle modifications. Ambulatory BP monitoring is particularly suitable in the assessment of changes in lifestyle affecting the circadian pattern of BP such as alcohol consumption and smoking.     

Risk factor identification and assessment in hypertension and diabetes (RIAHD) study

The RIAHD (Risk factor Identification and Assessment in Hypertension and Diabetes) study was conducted as a non-interventional study in 699 patients with hypertension without additional risk factors (low-risk) or with additional risk factors (high-risk), primarily diabetes and/or micro/macroalbuminuria (MA/A). The RIAHD study aimed to assess novel cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) such as blood viscosity, inflammatory markers and selected genetic polymorphisms. In addition, the RIAHD study also aimed to examine home versus office blood pressures (BPs), objective cardiovascular risk according to ESH/ESC Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation systems (SCORE) and subjectively expressed risk (clinical judgment) by physicians and patients. The health economic impact of other RFs, associated clinical conditions and target organ damage was also studied by evaluating healthcare utilization and sick leave in high-risk patients. In terms of circulating RFs, measured and calculated whole blood viscosity did not differ between the high and low-risk patient groups. Fibrinogen was significantly increased in the high-risk group, while hsCRP did not differ between the two groups. Self-measured BPs at home differed from BPs measured in the office. The average systolic home BPs was 11.8 mmHg lower in the low-risk group and 6.7 mmHg lower in the high-risk group. The diastolic home BPs averages differed 7.1mm Hg and 4.1mmHg from office BPs in the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. A higher home BP compared with the office BP, i.e. masked high BP values, was found in 21% of patients in the low-risk group and 32% of patients in the high-risk group. Global CV risk assessment (high-risk or low-risk) by the physicians corresponded well to objective risk evaluation (ESH/ESC) in the high-risk hypertensive patients, while physicians tended to underestimate the patients CV risk in the low-risk group (without diabetes and/or MA/A). Proper global risk assessment by judgement is often difficult in cardiovascular patients. The RIAHD study emphasizes the importance of performing a more extended RF assessment in hypertensive patients with as well as without diabetes and/or micro/macroalbuminuria in order to expose the full RF profile.     

Predictive factors for masked hypertension within a population of controlled hypertensives

CONTEXT: Prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) is far from negligible reaching 40% in some studies. The SHEAF study (Self measurement of blood pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-Up) and others clearly showed that masked hypertension (MH) as detected by home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. OBJECTIVE: Systematic HBPM to detect MH is not yet routine. The aim of this work is to better define the clinical profile of masked hypertensives within a population with controlled office blood pressure (BP) and the factors associated with a higher prevalence of MH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BP was measured at the clinic by the doctor and at home by the patient himself. Risk factors for MH were analysed in a cohort of 1150 treated hypertensive patients over the age of 60 (mean age 70 +/- 6.5, 48.9% men) with controlled office BP. (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg). RESULTS: 463 patients (40%) were masked hypertensives (SBP > or = 135 mmHg or DBP > or = 85 mmHg at home). Three parameters were associated with MH (odds ratio OR): office SBP (OR = 1.110), male gender (OR = 2.214) and age (OR = 1.031). Decision trees showed a 130 mmHg SBP was an efficient threshold to propose HBPM with a higher probability to detect MH. Subsequent variables were male gender and age over 70 in males. CONCLUSION: To detect masked hypertension, it would be logical to first of all select patients whose office SBP is between 130 and 140 mmHg.     

Multiple clinic and home blood pressure measurements versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

To compare multiple clinic and home blood pressure (BP) measurements and ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of hypertension, we studied 239 middle-aged pharmacologically untreated hypertensive men and women who were referred to the study from the primary healthcare provider. Ambulatory BP monitoring was successfully completed for 233 patients. Clinic BP was measured by a trained nurse with a mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged over 4 duplicate measures. Self-recorded home BP was measured with a semiautomatic oscillometric device twice every morning and twice every evening on 7 consecutive days. Ambulatory BP was recorded with an auscultatory device. Two-dimensionally controlled M-mode echocardiography was successfully performed on 232 patients. Twenty-four-hour urinary albumin was determined by nephelometry. Clinic BP was 144.5+/-12.6/94.5+/-7.4 mm Hg, home BP (the mean of 14 self-recorded measures) was 138.9+/-13.1/92.9+/-8.6 mm Hg, home morning BP (the mean of the first 4 duplicate morning measures) was 137.1+/-13.7/92.4+/-9.2 mm Hg, daytime ambulatory BP was 148.3+/-13. 9/91.9+/-7.8 mm Hg, nighttime ambulatory BP was 125.5+/-16.4/75. 6+/-8.9 mm Hg, and 24-hour ambulatory BP was 141.7+/-14.0/87.2+/-7.6 mm Hg. Pearson correlation coefficients of clinic, home, home morning, and daytime ambulatory BPs to albuminuria and to the characteristics of the left ventricle were nearly equal. In multivariate regression analyses, 36% (P<0.0001) of the cross-sectional variation in left ventricular mass index was attributed to gender and home morning systolic BP in models that originally included age, gender, and clinic, self-measured home morning, and ambulatory daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs. We concluded that carefully controlled nonphysician-measured clinic and self-measured home BPs, when averaged over 4 duplicate measurements, are as reliable as ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of untreated hypertension.     

Determination of the blood pressure level in mild hypertension. Significance of 20 minute resting blood pressure measurement comparing to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Determination of the blood pressure (BP) level in patients with mild hypertension (MHT) is quite difficult, since ulcerations of BP are tremendously exaggerated in the doctor's office. It has been well known that casual BP is less reliable to estimate LVH than BPs obtained at home or work-site. Although 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) has been widely accepted to overcome this problems, it is still controversial whether this method is applicable to all hypertensive subjects with special regards to its cost and effect. Therefore, our study has dealt mainly with the development of more convenient and less expensive method to get reasonable BPs. Twenty two nonmedicated patients with MHT were selected for the study. After taking casual BP in the office, the resting 20 minute BP measurements at every 2 minute interval were performed with Dynamap 950. Ten BP values thus obtained were divided into two categorical phases; early and late. The mean systolic and diastolic pressures (Ps & Pd) in the early phase were significantly higher than those in the late phase. Beside mean Ps and Pd obtained from 24 hour ABPM, 4 categorical phases based on the time of a day were defined; morning (from awaking to noon), afternoon (from noon to 6 pm), evening (from 6 pm to bed time) and night (during sleeping). Mutual correlation coefficients of these categorical BPs were calculated and compared to identify reasonably high significant correlations. The results revealed the highest BP at the office and the lowest one during sleeping. The office BPs closely resembled to the ones during afternoon period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Japanese society of hypertension (JSH) guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure at home.

Home blood pressure (BP) measurements are indispensable for the improvement of hypertension management in medical practice as well as for the recognition of hypertension in the population. The Working Group for Establishment of Guidelines for Measurement Procedures of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure at Home of the Japanese Society of Hypertension has established standards for all techniques and procedures of home BP measurements. The recommendations are as follows. Recommendation: 1) Arm-cuff devices based on the cuff-oscillometric method that have been validated officially, and the accuracy of which has been confirmed in each individual, should be used for home BP measurement. 2) The BP should be measured at the upper arm. Finger-cuff devices and wrist-cuff devices should not be used for home BP measurements. 3) Devices for home BP measurement should be adapted to the American Association for Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) guidelines. In addition, the difference between the BP measured by the auscultatory method and that measured using the device should be within 5 mmHg in each individual. The home measurement device should be validated before use, and at regular intervals during use. 4) Home BP should be monitored under the following conditions. The morning measurement should be made within 1 h after waking, after micturition, sitting after 1 to 2 min of rest, before drug ingestion, and before breakfast. The evening measurement should be made just before going to bed, sitting after 1 to 2 min of rest. 5) Home BP should be measured at least once in the morning and once in the evening. 6) All home BP measurements should be documented without selection, together with the date, time, and pulse rate. Use of devices with a printer or an integrated circuit memory is useful to avoid selection bias. 7) The home BP in the morning and that in the evening should be averaged separately for a certain period. The first measurement on each occasion should be used for totaling. 8) Home BP values averaged for a certain period indicate hypertension when 135/80 mmHg and over and definite hypertension when 135/85 mmHg and over. Normotension is defined as less than 125/80 mmHg and definite normotension as less than 125/75 mmHg. Home BP measurements based on these guidelines can be considered an appropriate tool for clinical decision-making, and it is hoped that these guidelines will serve to reduce confusion and confirm the place of home BP measurement in clinical practice.     

Clinical significance of nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring and nocturnal hypertension in Asia

Nocturnal home blood pressure (BP) monitoring has been used in clinical practice for ~20 years. The authors recently showed that nocturnal systolic BP (SBP) measured by a home BP monitoring (HBPM) device in a Japanese general practice population was a significant predictor of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, independent of office and morning home SBP levels, and that masked nocturnal hypertension obtained by HBPM (defined as nocturnal home BP ≥ 120/70 mmHg and average morning and evening BP < 135/85 mmHg) was associated with an increased risk of CVD events compared with controlled BP (nocturnal home BP < 120/70 mmHg and average morning and evening BP < 135/85 mmHg). This evidence revealed that (a) it is feasible to use a nocturnal HBPM device for monitoring nocturnal BP levels, and (b) such a device may offer an alternative to ambulatory BP monitoring, which has been the gold standard for the measurement of nocturnal BP. However, many unresolved clinical problems remain, such as the measurement schedule and conditions for the use of nocturnal HBPM. Further investigation of the measurement of nocturnal BP using an HBPM device and assessments of the prognostic value are thus warranted. Asians are at high risk of developing nocturnal hypertension due to high salt sensitivity and salt intake, and the precise management of their nocturnal BP levels is important. Information and communication technology‐based monitoring devices are expected to facilitate the management of nocturnal hypertension in Asian populations.