A possible relationship of nocturnal blood pressure variability with coronary artery disease in diabetic nephropathy

Evidence suggests a relationship between short-term blood pressure (BP) variability and cardiovascular target-organ damage. Although a blunted nocturnal decrease in BP and reduced heart rate variability have been shown to be associated with cardiovascular morbidity in diabetic patients, little information is available on short-term BP variability. In this study, short-term BP variability was assessed in 36 subjects with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring, and the factors that correlated with short-term BP variability were examined. The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) was significantly greater in the patients with increased 24-h systolic BP variability (67% versus 11%; p < 0.0005), while that of cerebrovascular disease was not significantly affected (61% versus 50%). Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that serum cholesterol (cholesterol) and plasma norepinephrine (p-NE) were significant and independent contributors to nighttime systolic BP variability (partial R2 = 0.490, p < 0.001; partial R2 = 0.470, p < 0.001) and demonstrated that body mass index and p-NE were primary determinants of nighttime diastolic BP variability (partial R2 = 0.539, p < 0.0005; partial R2 = 0.304, p < 0.05). Diabetic nephropathy patients with CAD had significantly increased daytime systolic (17.8 mmHg versus 13.1 mmHg, p < 0.0005), nighttime systolic (17.4 mmHg versus 10.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001), and nighttime diastolic (10.4 mmHg versus 7.2 mmHg, p < 0.05) BP variability. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that nighttime systolic BP variability was an independent risk factor for CAD (odds ratio 3.13 [95% CI 1.02-9.61]; p < 0.05). The increase in nighttime BP variability is associated with a proportional sympathetic activation in diabetic nephropathy. Elevated short-term BP variability combined with relative sympathetic prevalence during the night might represent an important risk factor for cardiovascular events in the diabetic population.     

Analysis of Factors that Affect Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure

Recent reports suggest the relationship of short-term blood pressure (BP) variability to cardiovascular target organ damage. In this study, short-term BP variability was assessed as the standard deviation of daytime and nighttime BP in 36 hospitalized patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. Positive correlations were observed between body mass index (BMI) and daytime systolic and diastolic BP variability, BMI and nighttime diastolic BP variability, cholesterol and daytime systolic BP variability, cholesterol and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP variability, nocturnal decline in BP and nighttime diastolic BP variability, and plasma concentration of norepinephrine (p-NE) and nighttime systolic BP variability. In multivariate linear regression analyses, BMI showed the strongest association with daytime and nighttime diastolic BP variability (p < .005 and p < .05). On the other hand, cholesterol and p-NE were the primary determinants of daytime and nighttime systolic BP variability, respectively (p < .01 and p < .0005). Interestingly, CRF patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) had significantly increased daytime systolic and diastolic BP variability and nighttime systolic BP variability (p < .05 or less). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that nighttime systolic BP variability was an independent risk factor of IHD in patients with CRF (odds ratio 1.50 [95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.25]; p < .05). Taken together, short-term BP variability is suggested to be affected by BMI, cholesterol, and p-NE in CRF patients. Furthermore, sympathetic nerve overactivitymay be involved in cardiovascular complications in CRF patients through the increase in nighttime systolic BP variability.     

Analysis of factors that affect short-term blood pressure variability in patients with chronic renal failure

Recent reports suggest the relationship of short-term blood pressure (BP) variability to cardiovascular target organ damage. In this study, short-term BP variability was assessed as the standard deviation of daytime and nighttime BP in 36 hospitalized patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. Positive correlations were observed between body mass index (BMI) and daytime systolic and diastolic BP variability, BMI and nighttime diastolic BP variability, cholesterol and daytime systolic BP variability, cholesterol and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP variability, nocturnal decline in BP and nighttime diastolic BP variability, and plasma concentration of norepinephrine (p-NE) and nighttime systolic BP variability. In multivariate linear regression analyses, BMI showed the strongest association with daytime and nighttime diastolic BP variability (p < .005 and p < .05). On the other hand, cholesterol and p-NE were the primary determinants of daytime and nighttime systolic BP variability, respectively (p < .01 and p < .0005). Interestingly, CRF patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) had significantly increased daytime systolic and diastolic BP variability and nighttime systolic BP variability (p < .05 or less). Furthermore, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that nighttime systolic BP variability was an independent risk factor of IHD in patients with CRF (odds ratio 1.50 [95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.25]; p < .05). Taken together, short-term BP variability is suggested to be affected by BMI, cholesterol, and p-NE in CRF patients. Furthermore, sympathetic nerve overactivity may be involved in cardiovascular complications in CRF patients through the increase in nighttime systolic BP variability.     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Is Increased in Diabetic Hypertensives

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible difference in the 24-hr BP profile—including short-term BP variability, assessed as the standard deviation—between diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensives. We measured 24-hr ambulatory BP in 11 diabetic hypertensives (diabetic HT) and 10 non-diabetic hypertensives (non-diabetic HT) who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital and were under stable salt intake. Renal function and sleep apnea were also estimated. There were no significant differences in 24-hr systolic BP (141 mmHg vs. 135 mmHg, ns), daytime systolic BP (143 mmHg vs. 138 mmHg, ns), and nighttime systolic BP (135 mmHg vs. 130 mmHg, ns) between diabetic HT and non-diabetic HT. The values of 24‐hr HR (69.7 beats/min vs. 65.2 beats/min, ns) and 24-hr HR variability (9.9 beats/min vs. 10.1 beats/min, ns) were also similar between the groups. Interestingly, diabetic HT had a significantly greater 24-hr systolic and diastolic BP variability than non-diabetic HT (18.2 mmHg vs. 14.5 mmHg, p < 0.05; 11.5 mmHg vs. 9.6 mmHg, p < 0.05, respectively). The values for creatinine clearance, urinary protein excretion, and apnea-hypopnea index were similar between the groups. Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that fasting blood glucose was the primary determinant of 24-hr diastolic BP variability (r = 0.661, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that fasting blood glucose was a significant and independent contributor to 24-hr systolic BP variability (r = 0.501, p < 0.05). Taken together, these results demonstrate that BP variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives. Furthermore, it is possible that an elevation of fasting blood glucose may contribute to the enhanced BP variability in hypertensives.     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Hypertensives with Renal Failure: Comparison between Diabetic Nephropathy and Non-Diabetic Glomerulopathy

The purpose of this study was to examine a possible difference in the 24-h blood pressure (BP) profile between hypertensives with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and those with non-diabetic glomerulopathy (non-DN). We measured 24-h ambulatory BP in 34 type 2 DN and 34 non-DN patients who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital. There were no significant differences in 24-h and daytime systolic BP between DN (143 vs. 136 mmHg, NS for 24-h systolic BP) and non-DN (143 vs. 138 mmHg, NS for daytime systolic BP). Although both groups disclosed blunted nocturnal decrease in BP and were classified as “non-dipper” type, DN patients had a significantly higher nighttime systolic BP than patients with non-DN (142 vs. 132 mmHg, p?=?0.0217). BP and heart rate (HR) variabilities were also estimated, and patients with DN showed a reduced nighttime HR variability than those with non-DN (4.8 vs. 6.6 beats/min, p?=?0.0115). DN patients had an increase in urinary protein excretion (3.0 vs. 1.4 g/day, p?=?0.0095) and a decrease in serum albumin concentration (3.1 vs. 3.7 mg/dl, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, urinary protein excretion was significantly correlated with nighttime systolic BP (r?=?0.480, p?=?0.0031) but not with nighttime HR variability. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the circadian rhythms of BP and HR are affected by underlying diseases and suggest that an elevated nighttime BP level may contribute to the enhanced urinary protein excretion in hypertensives with DN.     

Ambulatory blood pressure variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible difference in the 24-hr BP profile--including short-term BP variability, assessed as the standard deviation--between diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensives. We measured 24-hr ambulatory BP in 11 diabetic hypertensives (diabetic HT) and 10 non-diabetic hypertensives (non-diabetic HT) who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital and were under stable salt intake. Renal function and sleep apnea were also estimated. There were no significant differences in 24-hr systolic BP (141 mmHg vs. 135 mmHg, ns), daytime systolic BP (143 mmHg vs. 138 mmHg, ns), and nighttime systolic BP (135 mmHg vs. 130 mmHg, ns) between diabetic HT and non-diabetic HT. The values of 24-hr HR (69.7 beats/min vs. 65.2 beats/min, ns) and 24-hr HR variability (9.9 beats/min vs. 10.1 beats/min, ns) were also similar between the groups. Interestingly, diabetic HT had a significantly greater 24-hr systolic and diastolic BP variability than non-diabetic HT (18.2 mmHg vs. 14.5 mmHg, p < 0.05; 11.5 mmHg vs. 9.6 mmHg, p < 0.05, respectively). The values for creatinine clearance, urinary protein excretion, and apnea-hypopnea index were similar between the groups. Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that fasting blood glucose was the primary determinant of 24-hr diastolic BP variability (r = 0.661, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that fasting blood glucose was a significant and independent contributor to 24-hr systolic BP variability (r = 0.501, p < 0.05). Taken together, these results demonstrate that BP variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives. Furthermore, it is possible that an elevation of fasting blood glucose may contribute to the enhanced BP variability in hypertensives.     

High prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in parents of IDDM patients with albuminuria

Summary Life expectancy is shorter in the subset of insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients who are susceptible to kidney disease. Familial factors may be important. In this study the prevalence of cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity and of risk factors for cardiovascular disease was compared in the parents of 31 IDDM patients with elevated albumin excretion rate (AER > 45 μg/min; group A) with that of parents of 31 insulin-dependent diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria (AER < 20 μg/min; group B). The two diabetic patient groups were matched for age and duration of disease. Information on deceased parents was obtained from death certificates and clinical records and morbidity for cardiovascular disease was ascertained using the World Health Organization questionnaire and Minnesota coded ECG. Hyperlipidaemia was defined as serum cholesterol higher than 6 mmol/l and/or plasma triglycerides higher than 2.3 mmol/l and/or lipid lowering therapy; arterial hypertension as systolic blood pressure higher than 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive treatment. The percentage of dead parents was similar in the two groups (26 vs 20 % for parents of group A vs group B, respectively), but the parents of the diabetic patients with elevated AER had died at a younger age (58 ± 10 vs 70 ± 14 years; p < 0.05). Parents of diabetic patients with nephropathy had a more than three times greater frequency of combined mortality and morbidity for cardiovascular disease than that of the parents of diabetic patients without nephropathy (26 vs 8 %; odds ratio 3.96, 95 % CI 1.3 to 12.2; p < 0.02). Living parents of group A had a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (42 vs 14 % p < 0.01) and hyperlipidaemia (49 vs 26 % p < 0.05) as well as higher levels of lipoprotein (a) [median (range) 27.2 (1–107) vs 15.6 (0.2–98) mg/dl; p < 0.05]. They also had reduced insulin sensitivity [insulin tolerance test: median (range) K_itt index: 3.7 (0.7–6.2) vs 4.8 (0.7–6.7)% per min; p < 0.05]. In the families of IDDM patients with elevated AER there was a higher frequency of risk factors for cardiovascular disease as well as a predisposition to cardiovascular disease events. This may help explain, in part, the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity in those IDDM patients who develop nephropathy. [Diabetologia (1997) 40: 1191–1196] Received: 4 March 1997 and in revised form: 9 May 1997     

Ambulatory blood pressure variability is associated with restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in normotensive patients

Background

Previous studies have showed that BP variability is associated with cardiovascular events. However, no data were available regarding binary restenosis as an end-point after percutenous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods and results

This multicenter study included 100 consecutive normotensive patients with stable coronary artery disease who were planned for PCI. Before the index procedure, office BP and 24-h ambulatory BP measurements were performed. BP variability indices including systolic and diastolic 24-h average, the day and the night values of standard deviation (SD) and variation coefficient (VC) were measured and calculated. All patients underwent repeat coronary angiography at 6-month. According to angiographic results, 2 groups were formed; a restenosis group (n = 30) with binary restenosis of the stented segment and a control group (n = 70) with a stenosis diameter of <50% in stented segment. Systolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (14.0 ± 2.8 mmHg vs. 9.5 ± 1.6 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 16% ± 3 vs. 11% ± 2, p < 0.001, respectively), the day (15.2 ± 3.9 mmHg vs. 10.6 ± 1.7 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 17% ± 4 vs. 12% ± 2, p < 0.001, respectively), and the night (12.8 ± 4.1 mmHg vs. 8.4 ± 2.4 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 14% ± 5 vs. 11% ± 3, p = 0.004, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to control group. Similarly, diastolic SD and VC values for 24-h average (10.6 ± 2.5 mmHg vs. 8.1 ± 1.5 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 12% ± 3 vs. 9% ± 2, p = 0.001, respectively), the day (11.1 ± 2.9 mmHg vs. 9.0 ± 1.8 mmHg, p = 0.003 and 12% ± 3 vs. 10% ± 2, p = 0.006, respectively), and the night (10.0 ± 3.6 mmHg vs. 7.2 ± 2.0 mmHg, p = 0.001 and 11% ± 5 vs. 9% ± 3, p = 0.059, respectively) values were significantly higher in restenosis group compared to no restenosis group except for diastolic VC night. All systolic and diastolic BP variability indices except diastolic VC night were found to be independent predictors of risk of restenosis in multivariate analysis. In addition, the cut-off values of 11.4 mmHg and 13% for 24-h systolic SD and VC, respectively, were found to be highly sensitive (93% for both) and specific (94% and 91%, respectively) for predicting binary restenosis at 6-month after PCI.

Conclusions

BP variability indices are significantly and independently associated with binary restenosis and higher values can predict restenosis after PCI sensitively and specifically.     

The Relationship Between Obesity,Plasma Immunoreactive Insulin Concentration and Blood Pressure in Newly Diagnosed Indian Type 2 Diabetic Patients

The association of blood pressure with clinical and biochemical measures was studied in 185 newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetic patients, 74 impaired-glucose-tolerant (IGT) and 128 non-diabetic control subjects. Hyperglycaemic subjects were older than control subjects (controls 40 (24–59) years, IGT 48 (29–64) years, diabetic 43 (29–60) years, median (5th-95th centile) both p < 0.05). They were also more obese (body mass index (BMI) controls 23.5 kg m^?2 (17.2–29.9), IGT 26.0 kg m^?2 (19.8–33.9), diabetic 24.2 kg m^?2 (19.3–32.2)) and with a greater waist-hip ratio (controls 0.83 (0.70–0.98), IGT 0.88 (0.75–0.98), diabetic 0.89 (0.75–1.00)). Blood pressure was significantly higher in both IGT (systolic 127mmHg (108–162), diastolic 80 mmHg (66–99)) and diabetic patients (systolic 130 mmHg (104–160), diastolic 84 mmHg (66–102)) compared to non-diabetic controls (systolic 120 mmHg (100–151), diastolic 80 mmHg (60–94)). Univariate analysis showed that in diabetic patients systolic blood pressure was related to age (r = 0.17, p < 0.05), BMI (r= 0.23, p < 0.01) and plasma immunoreactive insulin (fasting and post glucose, r= ? 0.25, p<0.01) but not to C-peptide concentrations; diastolic blood pressure to BMI (r= 0.35, p < 0.001), waist-hip ratio (r = 0.23, p < 0.01) and plasma immunoreactive insulin (fasting r= 0.30, p < 0.001, post glucose r = ? 0.20, p < 0.05) but not to C-peptide concentrations. Multivariate analysis revealed that systolic blood pressure in diabetic patients was related to BMI (p < 0.01) and fasting immunoreactive insulin (p < 0.05) while diastolic blood pressure was related to BMI (p < 0.001) and waist-hip ratio (p < 0.01). Thus, blood pressure is associated with obesity even in our relatively non-obese population and it is also associated with plasma immunoreactive insulin concentrations. The mechanism of these associations remains to be established.     

Brachial and central hypertension in relation to coronary stenosis in patients with coronary angiography

The clinical significance of central beyond brachial blood pressure (BP) remains unclear. In patients who underwent coronary angiography, the authors explored whether elevated central BP would be associated with coronary arterial disease (CAD) irrespective of the status of brachial hypertension. From March 2021 to April 2022, 335 patients (mean age 64.9 years, 69.9% men) hospitalized for suspected CAD or unstable angina were screened in an ongoing trial. CAD was defined if a coronary stenosis of ≥50%. According to the presence of brachial (non-invasive cuff systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg) and central (invasive systolic BP ≥130 mmHg) hypertension, patients were cross-classified as isolated brachial hypertension (n = 23), isolated central hypertension (n = 93), and concordant normotension (n = 100) or hypertension (n = 119). In continuous analyses, both brachial and central systolic BPs were significantly related to CAD with similar standardized odds ratios (OR, 1.47 and 1.45, p < .05). While categorical analyses showed that patients with isolated central hypertension or concordant hypertension had a significantly higher prevalence of CAD and the Gensini score than those with concordant normotension. Multivariate-adjusted OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for CAD was 2.24 (1.16 to 4.33, p = .009) for isolated central hypertension and 3.02 (1.58 to 5.78, p < .001) for concordant hypertension relative to concordant normotension. The corresponding OR (95% CI) of a high Gensini score was 2.40 (1.26–4.58) and 2.17 (1.19–3.96), respectively. In conclusion, r egardless of the presence of brachial hypertension, elevated central BP was associated with the presence and severity of CAD, indicating that central hypertension is an important risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis.     

Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensives with renal failure: comparison between diabetic nephropathy and non-diabetic glomerulopathy

The purpose of this study was to examine a possible difference in the 24-h blood pressure (BP) profile between hypertensives with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and those with non-diabetic glomerulopathy (non-DN). We measured 24-h ambulatory BP in 34 type 2 DN and 34 non-DN patients who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital. There were no significant differences in 24-h and daytime systolic BP between DN (143 vs. 136 mmHg, NS for 24-h systolic BP) and non-DN (143 vs. 138 mmHg, NS for daytime systolic BP). Although both groups disclosed blunted nocturnal decrease in BP and were classified as "non-dipper" type, DN patients had a significantly higher nighttime systolic BP than patients with non-DN (142 vs. 132 mmHg, p = 0.0217). BP and heart rate (HR) variabilities were also estimated, and patients with DN showed a reduced nighttime HR variability than those with non-DN (4.8 vs. 6.6 beats/min, p = 0.0115). DN patients had an increase in urinary protein excretion (3.0 vs. 1.4 g/day, p = 0.0095) and a decrease in serum albumin concentration (3.1 vs. 3.7 mg/dl, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, urinary protein excretion was significantly correlated with nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.480, p = 0.0031) but not with nighttime HR variability. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the circadian rhythms of BP and HR are affected by underlying diseases and suggest that an elevated nighttime BP level may contribute to the enhanced urinary protein excretion in hypertensives with DN.     

Ambulatory pulse pressure, decreased nocturnal blood pressure reduction and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients

Aims/hypothesis  We followed type 2 diabetic patients over a long period to evaluate the predictive value of ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) and decreased nocturnal BP reduction (non-dipping) for nephropathy progression. Methods  Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 112) were followed for an average of 9.5 (range 0.5–14.5) years. At baseline, all patients underwent 24 h ambulatory BP measurement. Urinary albumin excretion rate was evaluated by three urinary albumin:creatinine ratio measurements at baseline and follow-up. Results  At baseline, patients who subsequently progressed to a more advanced nephropathy stage (n = 35) had reduced diastolic night/day BP variation and higher 24 h systolic BP and PP values; they also had more advanced nephropathy and were more likely to smoke than those with no progression of nephropathy (n = 77). In a Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of nephropathy progression were 24 h PP (p < 0.01), diastolic night:day BP ratio (p = 0.02) and smoking (p = 0.02). The adjusted hazards ratio (95% CI) for each mmHg increment in 24 h PP was 1.04 (1.01–1.07), whereas the adjusted hazards ratio (95% CI) for each 1% increase in diastolic night:day BP ratio was 1.06 (1.01–1.11). Only one of 33 patients (3.0%) with both a diastolic night:day BP ratio and a 24 h PP below the median progressed, whereas 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) with both a diastolic night:day BP ratio and a 24 h PP equal to or above the median progressed to a more advanced nephropathy stage (p < 0.001). Conclusions/interpretation  Ambulatory PP, impaired nocturnal BP decline and smoking are strong, independent predictors of nephropathy progression in type 2 diabetic patients.     

Increased vasopressor responsiveness to angiotensin II in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients without complications

Summary The blood pressure response to infused angiotensin II (0.3 to 3 ng · kg^–1 · min ^–1) was investigated in six normotensive patients with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes free of complications and in six healthy subjects matched for age, sex and weight. Basal blood pressures (111/68 and 114/72 mmHg) and basal plasma angiotensin II levels (18.0±5.2 and 14.1±2.4 pmol/l; mean + SD) were similar in the diabetic and control groups as were 24 h urinary excretions of sodium (157±88 and 154±84 mmol/24h). Equal increments in plasma angiotensin II were produced during the infusions in the two groups. Increases in both diastolic and systolic blood pressure were significantly greater in the diabetic patients throughout the infusion. Mean diastolic increments were: 6.7 versus 1.3 mmHg (0.3 ng dose), 11.0 versus 6.9 mmHg (1 ng dose) and 16.7 versus 12.3 mmHg (3 ng dose) (p<0.001). Corresponding figures for systolic pressure were: 8.7 versus 1.3mmHg, 10.3 versus 3.7mmHg and 15.3 versus 8.7mmHg (p<0.001). Vasopressor responsiveness to angiotensin II is thus increased in Type 1 diabetic patients without complications; it may, therefore, be a consequence of the diabetes rather than of the presence of microvascular disease or hypertension.     

Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in Type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

Summary The increased mortality of patients with diabetic nephropathy is mainly due to cardiovascular disease and end stage renal failure. Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent risk factor for myocardial ischaemia and sudden death. The aim of our cross-sectional study was to evaluate left ventricular structure and function in Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. M-mode and Doppler echocardiography were done on 105 Type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy [61 men, age (means ± SD) 44 ± 9 years, and albuminuria [median(range)] 567(10–8188) mg/24 h, serum creatinine 109 (53–558) μmol/l], and 140 Type I diabetic patients with persistent normoalbuminuria [79 men, 47 ± 10 years, urinary albumin excretion rate 8 (0–30) mg/24 h, and serum creatinine 81 (55–121) μmol/l]. Patients with and without nephropathy were comparable with respect to sex, body mass index, and duration of diabetes. Arterial blood pressure was slightly higher in patients with nephropathy: 140/79 ± 17/9 mm Hg vs 134/78 ± 15/8 mm Hg, p < 0.01, and the majority of proteinuric patients received antihypertensive drugs, 84 vs 17 %, respectively, p < 0.001. Left ventricular mass index was increased in the nephropathic group (means ± SD) 100.6 ± 23.9 g/m² compared with the normoalbuminuric group 91.4 ± 21.9 g/m², p = 0.002. Left ventricular hypertrophy was found more often in patients with nephropathy 23 (14–31)% compared with patients with normoalbuminuria 9 (5–14)%, p < 0.005. Diastolic function, assessed by the ratio between the peak diastolic velocity and the peak atrial systolic velocity (E/A ratio) and isovolumic relaxation time, was reduced in patients with vs without nephropathy: 1.17 ± 0.29 vs 1.34 ± 0.32, and 81.7 ± 16.5 vs 74.6 ± 14.5, p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively. Systolic function was about the same and normal in both groups. Our study suggests that an increase in left ventricular mass index and a decrease in diastolic function occurs early in the course of diabetic nephropathy. [Diabetologia (1999) 42: 76–80] Received: 16 April 1998 and in final revised form: 5 August 1998     

Effects of multiple factorial intervention on ambulatory BP profile and renal function in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy - a pilot study

Accumulating evidence has shown that diabetic patients are increasing in number, and renal and cardiovascular complications are the most common cause of death in diabetic patients. Thus, it would be of considerable value to identify the mechanisms involved in the progression of renal impairment and cardiovascular injury associated with diabetes. Recent evidence also indicated that multifactorial intervention is able to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and death among patients with diabetes and microalbuninuria. In this pilot study, we examined the effects of intensified multifactorial intervention, with tight glucose regulation and the use of valsartan and fluvastatin on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), in 20 hypertensive patients (16 male and 4 female) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy. After 12 months of intensified treatment, office BP, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) were significantly decreased compared to baseline (systolic blood pressure (SBP), 130 ± 2 vs. 150 ± 1 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 76 ± 1 vs. 86 ± 1 mmHg; FPG, 117 ± 5 vs. 153 ± 7 mg/dl; LDLC, 116 ± 8 vs. 162 ± 5 mg/dl, P < 0.0001). Also, compared to the baseline values, the daytime and nighttime ambulatory BP and short-term BP variability were significantly decreased after 12 months. Furthermore, while eGFR was not altered (44.3 ± 5.1 vs. 44.3 ± 6.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2), not significant (NS)), UACR showed a significant reduction after 12 months of intensified treatment (1228 ± 355 vs. 2340 ± 381 mg/g-cr, P < 0.05). These results suggest that the intensified multifactorial intervention is able to improve ambulatory BP profile, preserve renal function, and reduce urinary albumin excretion in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients with overt nephropathy.     

Renal kallikrein in diabetic patients with hypertension accompanied by nephropathy

Summary We measured the 24-h excretion of urinary kallikrein in 27 patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes and in 10 normal control subjects. Mean (± SD) kallikrein excretion in diabetic patients with nephropathy (6.2±2.4 naphthyl units (NU)/day,n=13) was significantly lower than in control subjects (12.8±3.4NU/day,p<0.01) and in diabetic patients without nephropathy (9.4±3.4NU/day,n=14,p<0.05). Kallikrein excretion in hypertensive diabetic patients with nephropathy (5.1±1.6 NU/day,n=8) was significantly lower (p<0.05) than in normotensive patients with nephropathy (8.3±2.1 NU/day,n=5). There were no significant differences in kallikrein excretion rate (24-h excretion of urinary kallikrein/24-h creatinine clearance) among control subjects (9.9±4.3 NU/ml), diabetic patients with (9.0±3.2 NU/ml) and without (9.3±3.5 NU/ml) nephropathy. However, kallikrein excretion rate in hypertensive diabetic patients with nephropathy (7.7±3.3 NU/ml) was significantly lower (p<0.05) than in normotensive diabetic patients with nephropathy (11.8 ±2.0 NU/ml,n=10). Respective basal and post-stimulated (with intravenous furosemide 40 mg plus 60 min ambulation) plasma aldosterone concentrations measured in control subjects and in hypertensive diabetic patients with nephropathy were similar and increased to the same extent in the 2 groups (5.5±3.2 versus 5.3±3.2 and 9.3±2.6 versus 10.5±3.4 ng/ml), although the respective plasma renin activity tended to be lower in diabetic patients than in control subjects (0.7±0.6 versus 1.3±0.9 and 1.8±1.8 versus 3.0±2.6 ng⁻¹ · ml⁻¹ · h⁻¹). The results indicate that urinary kallikrein excretion is decreased in hypertensive diabetic patients with nephropathy, and that the decrease might not be attributable to an altered renin-aldosterone system.     

Blood pressure means rather than nocturnal dipping pattern are related to complications in Type 2 diabetic patients

Aim To determine whether systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) means, during ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), are more strongly correlated with microvascular complications and echocardiographic structural alterations than night‐time/daytime (N/D) BP ratio. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted in 270 Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) outpatients who underwent clinical and laboratory investigations, urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) determination, echocardiography, office and 24‐h ABPM (Spacelabs 90207). Results UAER, after multivariate adjustments, was associated with office BP (systolic: R²_a 0.162, P < 0.001; diastolic: R²_a 0.124, P < 0.001) and ABPM (24‐h systolic: R²_a 0.195, P < 0.001; 24‐h diastolic: R²_a 0.197, P < 0.001) but not with N/D BP ratios (systolic: R²_a 0.062, P = 0.080; diastolic: R²_a 0.063, P = 0.069). Similar results were observed for echocardiographic parameters. The presence of retinopathy was associated only with night‐time BP values [systolic means: odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.24 and diastolic means: OR 1.21, CI 1.04–1.40 and N/D diastolic BP ratio > 0.90, OR 3.21, CI 1.65–6.25]. Conclusions UAER and echocardiographic structural alterations had more consistent correlations of a greater magnitude with systolic BP means than with N/D BP ratios. The nocturnal BP values appear to be more relevant for diabetic retinopathy. BP measurement in patients with Type 2 DM should take into account the 24‐h period rather than focusing on a specific time span of BP homeostasis.     

Global myocardial perfusion and diastolic function are impaired to a similar extent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in patients with coronary artery disease—evaluation by contrast echocardiography and pulsed tissue Doppler

Aims/hypothesis Using modern echocardiography, we quantified the extent of global myocardial function and perfusion abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes and compared this with the hypothetically similar extent of impairments in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).Subjects and methods This case–control study (66 patients) compared four age-matched groups: control, type 2 diabetic, CAD, and diabetic subjects with CAD (DCAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction >50%. CAD patients had 1–2 vessel disease. Diastolic and systolic myocardial velocities were assessed with pulsed tissue Doppler. Global myocardial perfusion was assessed with contrast echocardiography as indices of capillary blood volume and myocardial blood flow at maximal vasodilatation. In CAD and DCAD patients, functional and perfusion parameters were additionally assessed in the territory with a normal coronary angiogram reading, providing a model for comparison with the global data from control and diabetic patients.Results Comparing diabetic with control subjects, myocardial velocity at early diastole was impaired (8.8±1.8 vs 10.1±1.7 cm/s; p=0.02) and correlated inversely with age, HbA_1c and pulse pressure (R ²=0.761). Capillary blood volume (16.6±5.0 vs 24.4±4.9%) and blood flow (56±35 vs 114±40) were decreased (p=0.001). In CAD patients, myocardial velocity at early diastole was similarly decreased (p=0.02). CAD and DCAD patients were receiving more cardiovascular preventive therapy for the same extent of impaired global perfusion as in the less extensively treated diabetes group without CAD (p<0.002), but had superior perfusion of the ‘normal’ coronary territory than that group (p<0.05).Conclusions/interpretation In patients with diabetes, global diastolic function and myocardial capillary blood volume and blood flow are impaired to the same extent as in patients with CAD. These impairments could form the basis of new therapeutic concepts.     

Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as an independent predictor of mortality in diabetic nephropathy

Aims/hypothesis Raised N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is independently associated with an increased risk of death in chronic heart failure and acute coronary syndromes in nondiabetic populations. Diabetic nephropathy is characterised by an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in a large cohort of type 1 diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy.Methods In a prospective observational follow-up study, 198 type 1 diabetic patients with overt diabetic nephropathy (122 men, age [mean±SD] 41±10 years, duration of diabetes 28±8 years, GFR 74±33 ml min^–1) and a matched control group of 188 patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes and persistent normoalbuminuria (114 men, age 43±10 years, duration of diabetes 27±9 years) were followed for 9.3 (0.0–9.5) years. Plasma NT-proBNP concentration was determined by immunoassay at baseline.Results In patients with diabetic nephropathy, plasma NT-proBNP concentration was elevated to (median [range]) 110 (5–79640) ng l^–1 vs. 27 (5–455) ng l^–1 in normoalbuminuric patients (p<0.0001). Among patients with nephropathy, 39 (39%) patients with plasma NT-proBNP concentrations above the median and 12 (12%) with values below the median died from any cause (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.86 [95% CI 2.02–7.37], p<0.0001; covariate-adjusted hazard ratio 2.28 [1.04–4.99], p=0.04). This lower mortality rate was attributable to fewer cardiovascular deaths: 31 (31%) and 7 (7%) above and below the median NT-proBNP level respectively (unadjusted hazard ratio 5.25 [2.31–11.92], p<0.0001; covariate-adjusted hazard ratio 3.81 [1.46–9.94], p=0.006).Conclusions/interpretation Elevated circulating NT-proBNP is a new independent predictor of the excess overall and cardiovascular mortality in diabetic nephropathy patients without symptoms of heart failure.Per Hildebrandt has received an honorarium and served as consultant in a scientific advisory board for Roche.     

The Influence of Hypertension on Microvascular Blood Flow and Resistance to Flow in the Skin of Patients with Type 2 (Non-insulin-dependent) Diabetes

Maximum microvascular blood flow and resistance to flow were determined in the skin of nine hypertensive and nine normotensive Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and nine control subjects to determine the influence of hypertension on these variables. Maximum blood flow was reduced in both the hypertensive (1.05 (0.70–1.42) V) and normotensive (1.04 (0.79–1.63) V) Type 2 diabetic patients when compared with control subjects (1.40 (1.26–2.13) V, p < 0.01 for hypertensive and p < 0.05 for normotensive patients, respectively); however, maximum blood flow was similar in both groups of diabetic patients (p = 0.82). In contrast, resistance to flow was significantly greater in the diabetic patients with hypertension (127.2 (87.5–181.3) mmHg V^?1 vs 84.7 (61.9–123.0) mmHg V^?1 normotensive diabetic patients, p < 0.02). In addition, R was greater in the normotensive Type 2 diabetic patients than in control subjects (70.7 (44.7–79.9) mmHg V^?1, p < 0.05). These results suggest that hypertension is associated with an additional rise in pre-capillary vascular resistance in Type 2 diabetes which, while protecting the microcirculation from the effects of increased arterial pressure, may further diminish protective hyperaemic responses.