Differentiation of Charcot joint from osteomyelitis through dynamic bone imaging

The bone scans of 25 patients with a clinical diagnosis of diabetic osteoarthropathy (Charcot joint) of the ankle and foot were analysed using the technique of dynamic bone imaging. The analysis of time-activity curves generated over the Charcot joint, the contralateral joint and the bone above the Charcot joint, produces characteristic patterns that are distinguishable from the ones observed for osteomyelitis. Recently it has been shown that the significance of dynamic bone imaging resides in its correlation to physiological and morphological components of bone. The difference in the blood supply to the long bones has been suggested as an explanation for the difference in time-activity curve patterns.     

Differential diagnosis of pedal osteomyelitis and diabetic neuroarthropathy: MR Imaging

Almost all diabetic foot infections originate from a foot ulcer. Decreased pain perception and structural deformities such as previous partial foot amputation, Charcot joints, and toe deformity in combination with chronic ischemia lead to a propensity for skin breakdown and subsequent infection. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly performed to evaluate for potential bone infection, but diagnosis of osteomyelitis can be complicated because signal changes from acute Charcot arthropathy, fractures, and postoperative residues may be mistaken for infection. Signal alterations of bone infection may be atypical in sclerosing osteomyelitis and gangrene. Differentiation between osteomyelitis and acute or subacute neuroarthropathy requires careful analysis of the location of bone signal alterations, their distribution, and pattern because qualitative changes are often identical. Presence of secondary signs such as adjacent ulcer, cellulitis, and sinus tract is indicative of osteomyelitis. Differentiation of noninfected neuroarthropathy from infected neuroarthropathy based on MR examinations is difficult. Presence of a sinus tract, disappearance of subchondral cysts, diffuse bone marrow abnormality, and bone erosions are in favor of infection.     

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic foot with suspected osteomyelitis

Purpose

This study evaluated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Materials and methods

Sixteen diabetic patients underwent foot MRI between January 2006 and September 2007 for suspected unilateral osteomyelitis. Three of 16 patients showed radiographic changes due to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. Twelve of 16 patients also underwent MR angiography of the lower limbs for the purpose of planning surgical or endovascular treatment. The musculoskeletal and vascular MRI studies were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists.

Results

The final diagnosis, based on clinical, imaging, microbiological and histological findings, was osteomyelitis in 13/16 cases. Foot MRI allowed a correct diagnosis in 15/16 patients, with 1 false positive result demonstrated by computed tomography (CT)-guided bone biopsy. MR angiography of the lower limbs was considered nondiagnostic in 5/12 patients in the infrapopliteal region owing to venous contamination.

Conclusions

MRI has high sensitivity for the detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot but lower specificity related to Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy. If diagnostic uncertainty persists, a bone biopsy is indicated. The inflammatory hyperaemia caused by the ulcer deteriorates the diagnostic quality of 40%–50% of MR angiography studies in the infrapopliteal region. In these cases, selective arteriography is appropriate, as it can be performed in the same session as angioplasty.     

The diabetic foot: initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Osteomyelitis complicates up to one third of diabetic foot infections, is often due to direct contamination from a soft-tissue lesion, and represents a clinical challenge. Early diagnosis is important since antibiotic therapy can be curative and may prevent amputation. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. METHODS: Fourteen diabetic patients (10 men and 4 women; age range, 29-70 y) with 18 clinically suspected sites of infection underwent PET/CT after the injection of 185-370 MBq of 18F-FDG for suspected osteomyelitis complicating diabetic foot disease. PET, CT, and hybrid images were independently evaluated for the diagnosis and localization of an infectious process. Additional data provided by PET/CT for localization of infection in the bone or soft tissues were recorded. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and bacteriologic assays obtained at surgery or at clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: PET detected 14 foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 10 patients. PET/CT correctly localized 8 foci in 4 patients to bone, indicating osteomyelitis. PET/CT correctly excluded osteomyelitis in 5 foci in 5 patients, with the abnormal 18F-FDG uptake limited to infected soft tissues only. One site of mildly increased focal 18F-FDG uptake was localized by PET/CT to diabetic osteoarthropathy changes demonstrated on CT. Four patients showed no abnormally increased 18F-FDG uptake and no further evidence of an infectious process on clinical and imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET can be used for diagnosis of diabetes-related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased 18F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection.     

Imaging of the diabetic foot

Destruction in diabetic feet is secondary to neuropathy (peripheral and autonomic nervous system) in association with microangiopathy. The loss of sensation to pain and the static trouble lead to increase the pressure in some areas and predispose to pedal skin ulceration, the precursor of osteomyelitis. Plain radiography should be the first step in the evaluation for diagnosis and follow-up. The initial patterns are nonspecific but very rapid evolution associating osteolysis, osteosclerosis and fragmentation lead to the Charcot foot. When osteomyelitis is suspected, scintigraphy with labelled white blood cells and MRI are necessary to differentiate infection from neuropathy.     

Indium-111-leukocyte/technetium-99m-MDP bone and magnetic resonance imaging: difficulty of diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with neuropathic osteoarthropathy

Fourteen patients (16 sites) with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot joints) were evaluated with combined indium-111-leukocyte (111In-WBC) and technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) bone imaging for suspected osteomyelitis. Magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained in seven patients. Using a positive bone culture as the criterion for the presence of osteomyelitis, there were four true-positive studies, six true-negative sites, and one false-negative 111In-WBC study. Five of 16 sites (31%) had false-positive 111In-WBC uptake at noninfected sites. There were four true-positive and three false-positive MR studies. All false-positives showed at least moderately abnormal findings by both techniques at sites of rapidly progressing osteoarthropathy of recent onset. In this preliminary study, both techniques appear to be sensitive for detection of osteomyelitis, and a negative study makes osteomyelitis unlikely. However, the findings of 111In-WBC/99mTc-MDP and MR images at sites of rapidly progressing, noninfected neuropathic osteoarthropathy may be indistinguishable from those of osteomyelitis.     

Evaluation of infectious diabetic foot complications with indium-111-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G.

Osteomyelitis of the foot is a well-known complication of diabetes mellitus. In this study, the validity of 111In-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G (IgG) scintigraphy was studied in 16 diabetic patients with foot ulcers, gangrene or painful Charcot joints. In all patients, plain radiographs, conventional bone scan images and 111In-IgG images were recorded. The results were verified by histologic examination of surgical specimens in patients who did not respond to antibiotic treatment within 2-3 wk (10 lesions) or long-term clinical follow-up of at least 6-mo (16 lesions). On the bone scans, all seven osteomyelitic foci were detected. However, 19 additional foci not due to osteomyelitis were seen. The absence of true-negative bone scans in this study resulted in a specificity of 0%. On the plain radiographs, four of seven osteomyelitis foci were detected; for 111In-IgG scintigraphy, six of seven (sensitivity 57% and 86%, respectively). Plain radiographs correctly ruled out osteomyelitis in 15 of 19 lesions, 111In-IgG scintigraphy in 16 of 19 (specificity 79% and 84%, respectively). All imaging procedures gave false-positive results in penetrating ulcers over the calcaneus in two patients and in one patient with a Charcot joint, most likely due to recent fractures. A false-negative 111In-IgG study was observed in a patient with severe arterial angiopathy. Accurate estimation of probable osteomyelitis was not possible from the results of soft-tissue cultures, since in only 6 of 12 positive cultures, osteomyelitic foci could be proven. Indium-111-IgG scintigraphy can contribute to adequate evaluation of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot complications because it improves specificity when compared to bone scan and radiographic findings and improves sensitivity in comparison to plain radiographs.     

Charcot foot osteoarthropathy in diabetes mellitus.

Charcot joint, a destructive bone and joint disorder of the foot, is becoming more common in long-term diabetic patients. The combination of diabetic neuropathy and painless trauma causes dislocation and collapse of the tarsal joints. The resulting soft tissue and osseous pathology easily mimics an infective episode. This report presents a review of the clinical identification, diagnosis, and treatment of this unusual diabetic complication, plus a review of three cases. Also, the pathogenesis of Charcot joint is explained in describing why surgery can be a viable treatment alternative in these patients, after careful evaluation. It is also necessary that physicians inspect the feet of their diabetic patients to rule out quiescent beginnings of Charcot joints. Referral to a podiatrist is recommended for long-term management of the Charcot foot.     

The diabetic foot

Foot complications in diabetics often lead to amputation. Ulceration is the most common complication in the diabetic forefoot and underlies more than 90% of cases of pedal osteomyelitis. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis is, nevertheless, difficult, and imaging is an important part of the work-up. Plain radiographs, although useful for anatomical information, are neither sensitive nor specific. Three-phase bone scintigraphy is sensitive but not specific. Labelled leucocyte scintigraphy and MRI are both useful and are complementary to one another. Labelled leucocyte scintigraphy is valuable for diagnosis as well as follow-up of pedal osteomyelitis. MRI offers exquisite anatomical detail, which is invaluable for guiding surgical management. The principal complication in the mid and hind foot is the neuropathic or Charcot joint. Although infection of the neuropathic joint is infrequent, its diagnosis is difficult. The extensive bony changes that accompany this disorder severely diminish the value of radiography and bone scintigraphy. It is not always possible to distinguish the marrow oedema of neuropathy from that of osteomyelitis and the role of MRI in the evaluation of this entity is still uncertain. Uptake of labelled leucocytes in the absence of infection may occur and is owing, at least in part, to haematopoietically active marrow. Combined leucocyte/marrow scintigraphy holds considerable promise for identifying the infected Charcot joint.     

Critical Limb Ischemia in Association with Charcot Neuroarthropathy: Complex Endovascular Therapy for Limb Salvage

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a low-incidence complication of diabetic foot and is associated with ankle and hind foot deformity. Patients who have not developed deep ulcers are managed with offloading and supportive bracing or orthopedic arthrodesis. In patients who have developed ulcers and severe ankle instability and deformity, below-the-knee amputation is often indicated, especially when deformity and cutaneous involvement result in osteomyelitis. Ischemic association has not been described but can be present as a part of peripheral arterial disease in the diabetic population. In this extreme and advanced stage of combined neuroischemic diabetic foot disease, revascularization strategies can support surgical and orthopedic therapy, thus preventing osteomyelitis and leading to limb and foot salvage.     

FDG PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot

Purpose

Osteomyelitis, the most serious complication of the diabetic foot, occurs in about 20?% of patients. Early diagnosis is crucial. Appropriate treatment will avoid or decrease the likelihood of amputation. The objective of this study was to assess the value of FDG PET/CT in diabetic patients with clinically suspected osteomyelitis.

Methods

Enrolled in this prospective study were 39 consecutive diabetic patients (29 men and 10 women, mean age 57?years, range 28–71?years) with 46 suspected sites of foot infection. Of these 39 patients, 38 had type 2 and 1 type 1 diabetes for 4–25?years, and 28 were receiving treatment with insulin. FDG PET/CT was interpreted for the presence, intensity (SUVmax) and localization of increased FDG foci. Final diagnosis was based on histopathology and bacteriology of surgical samples, or clinical and imaging follow-up.

Results

Osteomyelitis was correctly diagnosed in 18 and excluded in 21 sites. Of 20 lesions with focal bone FDG uptake, 2 were false-positive with no further evidence of osteomyelitis. Five sites of diffuse FDG uptake involving more than one bone on CT were correctly diagnosed as diabetic osteoarthropathy. FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100?%, 92?% and 95?% in a patient-based analysis and 100?%, 93?% and 96?% in a lesion-based analysis, respectively, for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT was found to have high performance indices for evaluation of the diabetic foot. The PET component identified FDG-avid foci in sites of acute infection which were precisely localized on fused PET/CT images allowing correct differentiation between osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection.     

Combined bone scintigraphy and indium-111 leukocyte scans in neuropathic foot disease

It is difficult to diagnose osteomyelitis in the presence of neurotrophic osteoarthropathy. We performed combined [99mTc]MDP bone scans and indium-111 (111In) leukocyte studies on 35 patients who had radiographic evidence of neuropathic foot disease and clinically suspected osteomyelitis. The [111In]leukocyte study determined if there was an infection and the bone scan provided the anatomic landmarks so that the infection could be localized to the bone or the adjacent soft tissue. Seventeen patients had osteomyelitis and all showed increased [111In]leukocyte activity localized to the bone, giving a sensitivity of 100%. Among the 18 patients without osteomyelitis, eight had no accumulation of [111In]leukocytes, seven had the [111In]leukocyte activity correctly localized to the soft tissue, two had [111In]leukocyte activity mistakenly attributed to the bone, and one had [111In]leukocyte accumulation in a proven neuroma which was mistakenly attributed to bone. These three false-positive results for osteomyelitis reduced the specificity to 83%. Considering only the 27 patients with a positive [111In]leukocyte study, the combined bone scan and [111In]leukocyte study correctly localized the infection to the soft tissues or bone in 89%. Uninfected neurotrophic osteoarthropathy does not accumulate [111In]leukocytes. We found the combined bone scan and [111In] leukocyte study useful for the detection and localization of infection to soft tissue or bone in patients with neuropathic foot disease.     

Potential role of FDG PET in the setting of diabetic neuro-osteoarthropathy: can it differentiate uncomplicated Charcot's neuroarthropathy from osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection?

BACKGROUND: This paper is based on the results from an ongoing prospective trial designed to investigate the usefulness of FDG PET in the complicated diabetic foot. AIM: To investigate the potential utility of FDG PET imaging in the setting of acute neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot's foot). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 63 patients, in four groups, were evaluated. The groups were: (A) 17 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Charcot's neuroarthropathy (11 men, six women; mean age: 59.4+/-8.6 years); (B) 21 patients with uncomplicated diabetic foot (16 men, five women; mean age: 63+/-10 years); (C) 20 non-diabetic patients with normal lower extremities (12 men, eight women; mean age 54+/-19 years); and (D) five patients with proven osteomyelitis secondary to complicated diabetic foot (three men, two women; mean age: 61.2+/-13.9 years). Five patients in group A had foot ulcer and intermediate to high degree of suspicion for superimposed osteomyelitis. Each subject underwent FDG PET imaging of the lower extremities in addition to MRI and the findings were compared with the final diagnostic outcome based on histopathology and clinical follow-up. The images were examined visually for focal abnormalities. Regions of interest were assigned to the sites of abnormal FDG uptake for calculating maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Two important clinical decision-making issues were explored: (1) whether FDG PET shows a definitive uptake pattern in Charcot's neuroarthropathy and if so whether that could be utilized to differentiate it from other complicated forms of diabetic foot like osteomyelitis and cellulitis, which is frequently a diagnostic challenge in this clinical setting; and (2) how accurate FDG PET is in detection soft tissue infection in patients with Charcot's foot. These issues were examined by utilizing FDG PET findings along with MRI results in the same patient. RESULTS: We observed a low degree of diffuse FDG uptake in the Charcot's joints. This was clearly distinguishable from the normal joints. The SUVmax in the Charcot's lesions varied from 0.7 to 2.4 (mean, 1.3+/-0.4) while those of midfoot of the normal control subjects and the uncomplicated diabetic foot ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 (mean 0.42+/-0.12) and from 0.2 to 0.8 (mean 0.5+/-0.16), respectively. The only patient with Charcot's foot with superimposed osteomyelitis had an SUVmax of 6.5. The SUVmax of the sites of osteomyelitis as a complication of diabetic foot was 2.9-6.2 (mean: 4.38+/-1.39). Unifactorial analysis of variance test yielded a statistical significance in the SUVmax between the four groups (P<0.01). The SUVmax between the normal control groups and the uncomplicated diabetic foot was not statistically significant by the Student's t-test (P>0.05). In the setting of concomitant foot ulcer FDG PET accurately ruled out osteomyelitis. Overall sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET in the diagnosis of Charcot's foot was 100 and 93.8%, respectively; and for MRI were 76.9 and 75%, respectively. FDG PET showed foci of abnormally enhanced uptake in the soft tissue which was suggestive of inflammation in seven cases (43.75%) which were proven pathologically to be secondary to infection. In only two of these cases the features of soft tissue infection were noted on the magnetic resonance images. CONCLUSION: The results support a valuable role of FDG PET in the setting of Charcot's neuroarthropathy by reliably differentiating it from osteomyelitis both in general and when foot ulcer is present.     

Infection in diabetic osteoarthropathy: use of indium-labeled leukocytes for diagnosis

Indium-111 labeled leukocyte imaging was compared with three-phase skeletal scintigraphy as a means of determining whether osteomyelitis was complicating diabetic osteoarthropathy. Three-phase scintigraphy demonstrated increased activity in both infected and noninfected osteopathic bone, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 56% for osteomyelitis. Leukocyte imaging had the same sensitivity but was most helpful for excluding infection (specificity, 89%) when three-phase imaging could not. Abnormal leukocyte localization was seen at the primary site of infection in all cases within 4 hours after injection. Disadvantages of leukocyte imaging included long preparation time, low count rates resulting in poor spatial resolution, and absence of bone landmarks, which made it difficult to differentiate soft tissue from bone infection.     

Utility of 99mTc-labelled antimicrobial peptide ubiquicidin (29-41) in the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection

Purpose

Detection of osteomyelitis beneath a diabetic foot ulcer is imperative for proper management; however, accurate and noninvasive diagnosis of osteomyelitis remains a challenge. Ubiquicidin 29-41 (UBI 29-41) is a synthetic antimicrobial peptide fragment reported to be highly infection-specific. ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 has recently been reported to be a promising radiotracer for infection imaging. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the utility of ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 scintigraphy in diabetic patients with suspected osteomyelitis of the foot.

Methods

Included in the study were 65 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and foot ulcer and with clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis . Each patient had a three-phase bone scan and a ^99mTc-UBI scan at 30 and 60 min after injection. The scan was considered to be consistent with osteomyelitis when the ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 uptake was concordant with the ^99mTc-MDP uptake. It was considered negative for osteomyelitis if there was no uptake of ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 or if ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 accumulated in an area not concordant with the abnormal uptake of ^99mTc-MDP on the bone scan. In the latter case a diagnosis of soft-tissue infection was made. Bone infection was confirmed by bone biopsy/culture and by clinical and radiological follow-up.

Results

Final analysis was done in 55 patients. Osteomyelitis was confirmed in 37 patients, and 18 patients were free of bone infection. ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 was positive in all 37 patients and with the bone scan as the reference for the bone identified all osteomyelitic foci (68 in total). ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 was negative for osteomyelitis in all 18 patients, and 17 of these patients were diagnosed with soft-tissue infection (^99mTc-UBI 29-41 accumulation without concordant abnormal uptake on bone scintigraphy). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 scan in combination with three-phase bone scan for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot was 100 %. Accuracy for soft-tissue infection was also 100 %. Maximum accumulation of the ^99mTc-UBI 29-41 with maximum target to background activity was observed in the infectious foci at 30 min after injection.

Conclusion

Tc-UBI 29-41 may be a useful agent for the accurate diagnosis of bone infection in diabetic foot because of the high accuracy demonstrated in this pilot study. It was able to differentiate between bone and soft-tissue involvement effectively in combination with a bone scan.     

Contribution of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime labelled leucocyte scintigraphy to the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection

We conducted a prospective study in order to evaluate the contribution of technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (HMPAO) labelled leucocyte scintigraphy to the diagnosis and follow-up of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. The study was conducted between October 1992 and November 1996 and included 42 patients (30 men and 12 women; mean age 63 years) with diabetes mellitus (type 1, n = 22, type 2, n = 20) who had a total of 56 diabetic foot ulcers. The initial exploration included standard radiography, three-phase bone scintigraphy and ^99mTc-HMPAO labelled leucocyte scintigraphy (HMPAO-LS), performed within a 3-day interval. For the 56 ulceration sites, 26 cases of osteomyelitis were diagnosed: ten on the basis of radiographic and histological/bacteriological criteria after bone biopsy, 11 after radiographic follow-up and five on the basis of biopsy results alone. No osteomyelitis was present at 30 sites, there were seven cases of cellulitis. The sensitivity and specificity of ^99mTc-HMPAO-LS were 88.4% and 96.6% respectively (23 true-positives, 29 true-negatives, one false-positive, three false-negatives). The accuracy of radiography, ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate and HMPAO-LS was 69.6%, 62.5%, and 92.9%, respectively. Follow-up scintigraphy (n = 14) 4 months after initial diagnosis and 1 month after antibiotic withdrawal confirmed cure of osteomyelitis despite the absence of complete clinical regression of the ulcers. In conclusion, ^99mTc-HMPAO labelled leucocyte scintigraphy was found to be an excellent method for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. It can contribute to follow-up, particularly when clinical regression of perforating ulcers is incomplete and cure of osteomyelitis must be confirmed in order that antibiotic treatment may be discontinued. Received 10 July and in revised form 1 October 1997     

Role of scintigraphy in musculoskeletal and spinal infections

Clinical findings are still the mainstay for suspecting the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections, especially osteomyelitis. No single complementary imaging technique has 100% specificity and sensitivity for every case of musculoskeletal infection. Depending on the age of the patient, presence of orthopedic hardware, location of infection, underlying bone, and systemic conditions, the choice of imaging modalities must be tailored to the patient's condition. Plain radiographs are performed first and may be sufficient. In children, bone scan is highly accurate to diagnose osteomyelitis. Labeled leukocytes with complementary bone or bone marrow studies are recommended for orthopedic hardware or diabetic foot. Finally, gallium scanning is useful for the diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis. Current radiopharmaceuticals used for diagnosing infection also label inflammation. Newer products, as Infecton, should in the future allow better differentiation between infection and sterile inflammation.     

Combined leukocyte and bone imaging used to evaluate diabetic osteoarthropathy and osteomyelitis

Six diabetic patients with roentgenographic finding of osteomyelitis, osteoarthropathy, or both, had combined leukocyte and bone imaging. Bone images demonstrated increased activity in all cases, including three without osteomyelitis. Leukocyte images, however, showed increased activity in only the three cases of osteomyelitis. There was minimal or no activity in the other three cases where osteoarthropathy was ultimately believed to be the basis of the roentgenographic and bone imaging changes.     

MR imaging of the diabetic foot: diagnostic challenges

Pedal complications of diabetes have long presented a challenge for the clinician and radiologist predominately related to the difficulty in distinguishing infection from neuroarthropathy. The spectrum of diabetic foot infections is broad, ranging from callous and ulcer formation, to septic arthritis, abscess formation, and osteomyelitis. This article summarizes the MR imaging findings in the diabetic foot and the optimal pulse sequences. Focus is placed on aids in differentiating diabetic infection from other entities and increasing the specificity of diagnosing diabetic foot complications.     

Imaging the diabetic foot

Early and accurate diagnosis of infection or neuropathy of the diabetic foot is the key to successful management. Angiopathy leads to ischemia which, in combination with peripheral neuropathy, predisposes to pedal skin ulceration, the precursor of osteomyelitis. Chronic hyperglycemia promotes production of glycosylated end products which accumulate on endothelial proteins, causing ischemia of the vasa nervorum. When combined with axonal degeneration of the sensory nerves, the result is hypertrophic neuroarthropathy. Should the sympathetic nerve fibers also be damaged, the resultant loss of vasoconstrictive impulses leads to hyperemia and atrophic neuroarthropathy. Plain radiography, although less sensitive than radionuclide, magnetic resonance (MR), and computed tomographic examinations, should be the initial procedure for imaging suspected osteomyelitis in the diabetic patient. If the radiographs are normal but the clinical suspicion of osteomyelitis is strong, a three-phase ^99mTc-MDP scan or MR imaging is recommended. An equivocal ^99mTc-MDP scan should be followed by MR imaging. To exclude osteomyelitis at a site of neuroarthropathy, a ¹¹¹In white blood cell scan is preferable. To obtain a specimen of bone for bacteriological studies, percutaneous core biopsy is the procedure of choice, with the entrance of the needle well beyond the edge of the subjacent ulcer.