Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer

Our objectives were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with stage IV MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. Up to 6 cycles were given. A total of 46 patients with a median age of 49 years (range 24-77) and Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above were enrolled. In total, 238 cycles were administered. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (17%) achieved a complete response and 27 (64%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 81% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-93%]. Median time to progression was 14.9 months (95% CI 0-30.2 months). Median duration of response was 24.2 months (95% CI 11.2-37.3 months). The median survival was 27.9 months (95% CI 23.1-32.7 months), and the 1- and 2-year survival probabilities were 71.4 and 61.4%, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (41.3%), anemia (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (8.7%), alopecia (26.1%) and nausea/vomiting (32.6%). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with MBC. The time to progression of 14.9 months compares favorably with other standard treatments (anthracyclines, taxanes). A randomized study is required to further investigate the role of this combination as first-line treatment for MBC.     

Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase II study

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) (day 1) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (administered as 40 mg/m(2) doses each on days 1 and 2) every 3 weeks as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-two NSCLC patients were enrolled, most of them with stage IV disease (74%). A total of 195 chemotherapy cycles were administered (median 6, range 1-6). All patients were considered evaluable for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 33-64), including one CR (3%) and 19 PRs (45%). Stable disease was found in 6 patients (14%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.7) and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-16.0). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 36.0% (95% CI, 19.9-52.0) and 18.0% (95% CI, 3.9-32.1), respectively. Overall, the combination showed an excellent safety profile. Severe hematological toxicities were uncommon: neutropenia (5% of patients, 1% of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (2% of patients, 0.5% of cycles). Asthenia (12%) was the only grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity that affected more than 10% of patients. There were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients showed similar efficacy as the same combination with higher doses of docetaxel but where cisplatin was administered in a single dose. This new schedule shows promise in its excellent hematological and non-hematological toxicity profile. A randomized phase III trial is needed to confirm these results.     

Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Gemcitabine has activity in advanced ovarian cancer, with responses in platinum-resistant disease. This study assessed the activity of gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients had histologically verified invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV disease and no prior chemotherapy. Patients received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Radiological response was assessed after two cycles. Between December 1992 and October 1995, 35 patients were enrolled. Of 33 evaluable patients, there was one complete response and five partial responses, for an overall response rate of 18% (95% confidence interval 7-36%). Forty-two percent of patients had a greater than 50% decrease in their CA-125 levels. Of the 25 patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy following treatment with gemcitabine, 12 achieved an overall response rate of 48%. Toxicity was mild, with two episodes of WHO grade 4 neutropenia (not associated with fever) and two episodes of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (not associated with bleeding). Gemcitabine has single-agent activity for poor-prognosis patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Similar results with subsequent platinum-based therapy indicate a lack of cross-resistance. This, combined with gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile, warrants testing in comparative trials.     

Phase II study of a 4-week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. An open-label multicenter phase II study was conducted for previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Oral capecitabine 828 mg/m2 twice daily was given on days 1-21 every 4 weeks. Baseline characteristics of 60 enrolled patients were: male/female 49/11, median age 64 years (range 28-74), good performance status (ECOG 0-1) in 98% of patients and 27 patients had prior gastrectomy (45%). A median of 4 treatment cycles were administered (range 1-37). Five patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis because they did not meet eligibility criteria. The overall response rate (RR) in the evaluable patient population (n=55) was 26% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 15-39%] and a further 29% of patients had stable disease. The overall RR in the intent-to-treat population (n=60) was 23% (95% CI 13-36.0%). Median time to progression in the evaluable patient population was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8-6.1) and overall survival time in the intent-to-treat population was 10.0 months (95% CI 6.4-13.6). The most frequent grade 3/4 drug-related adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (13%), but this was readily managed by treatment interruption and dose reduction. No patients developed grade 3/4 drug-related diarrhea, vomiting, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. We conclude that this 4-week regimen of capecitabine showed promising activity and was well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted.     

A phase II Japanese study of a modified capecitabine regimen for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

This phase II study evaluated a modified Japanese capecitabine regimen as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer. Sixty patients received oral capecitabine 828 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. In the 56 efficacy-evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 26.8% (95% CI 15.8-40.3%) and 21 patients (37.5%) had stable disease. The median duration of response and overall survival times were 7.4 months (range 4.3-13.8) and 17.6 months (95% CI 14.1-20.5), respectively. The most frequent non-hematological treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were hand-foot syndrome (62.7%), anorexia (28.8%), diarrhea (22.0%) and fever (22.0%). There was no grade 3/4 diarrhea. The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were lymphocytopenia (30.5%) and hyperbilirubinemia (35.6%). We conclude that the modified Japanese intermittent regimen of capecitabine is effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and is worthy of further study in larger phase III studies.     

Multicenter phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer refractory to gemcitabine

Gemcitabine is widely used for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) as first-line chemotherapy. However, there is no standard chemotherapy for patient with advanced BTC refractory to gemcitabine. We conducted a multicenter phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced BTC that were refractory to gemcitabine. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 28 days, followed by 14 days of rest. This regimen was repeated every 6 weeks. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Twenty-two patients were enrolled between March 2007 and January 2010, with 14 patients (64%) representing cases of recurrence after surgery. The overall response rate was 22.7%, and the overall disease control rate was 50.0%. The median overall survival time was 13.5 months (95% CI, 7.1-23.1 months) and the median time-to-progression was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.6-17.2 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (5%) and anemia (5%). The most common non-hematological toxicities were nausea (27%), anorexia (55%), and pigmentation (32%). In conclusion, S-1 monotherapy is feasible and moderately efficacious second-line chemotherapy for advanced BTC.     

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 every 21 days for solid tumors: Result of a dose-intensity study

Summary Background: Three and 4-week cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules have shown similar dose-intensity (DI) and activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 3-week schedule is generally preferred because it enables better treatment compliance. To improve DI and compliance further, we delivered gemcitabine plus cisplatin over 4 days every 21 days. Methods: Patients with any stage NSCLC or epithelial neoplasms and an ECOG PS ≤2 were given gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 2 of a 21-day cycle. Minimax design was used and a received DI for gemcitabine of ≥580 mg/m²/wk was considered successful. Results: Thirty-nine patients (34 NSCLC, 5 epithelial neoplasias) were enrolled. SWOG grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17.9% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was minimal. Twenty-eight (18%) of 158 cycles required dose modifications and/or delays. Twenty-five patients received a gemcitabine dose intensity of ≥580 mg/m²/wk. The received DIs were 601.8 mg/m²/wk for gemcitabine and 21.0 for cisplatin, with a relative DIs of 90.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The response rate of 27 evaluable patients with NSCLC was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.3 to 62.7%). Conclusions: The shorter schedule of gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin on day 2 produces an effective DI and a toxicity profile comparable to that of weekly regimens.     

A randomized phase II study of recombinant human endostatin plus gemcitabine/cisplatin compared with gemcitabine/cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose Studies indicate that recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin) can inhibit tumor endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth. This study assessed the efficacy of the combination of standard gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy with rh-endostatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy alone or with 7.5 mg/ m² of intravenously rh-endostatin on days 1 to 14 of each 3-week cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Results Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. The best ORRs for rh-endostatin arm (n = 33) and chemotherapy-alone arm were 37.5% (95% CI: 21.3 to 47.2%) and 28.6% (95% CI: 19.8 to 37.6%), respectively. Median survival was 12.4 months in the rh-endostatin arm and 9.8 months in the chemotherapy-alone arm, and 1-year survival was 51.6% and 38.7%, respectively. Mild palpitions, diarrhea, and liver dysfunction were the most common rh-endostatin-related adverse events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were all reported similar for patients in the two arms. Conclusion The addition of rh-endostatin to gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for first-line treatment of NSCLC improves objective response and may improve survival.     

Docetaxel plus oxaliplatin (DOCOX) as a second-line treatment after failure of fluoropyrimidine and platinum in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer

The fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based combination chemotherapy is now widely used as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Unfortunately, about half of all patients do not respond to the current first-line chemotherapy and furthermore, most patients who achieve response to first-line chemotherapy eventually experience disease progression. Although there is a need for effective salvage treatment after the failure of first-line chemotherapy, data on the safety and efficacy of second-line treatment in AGC is limited. The current study evaluated an experimental combination regimen of docetaxel (60 mg/m) as an intravenous infusion of less than 1 h, followed by oxaliplatin (130 mg/m) intravenously for less than 2 h. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, in pretreated Chinese patients with AGC. The trial enrolled 48 patients of whom 46 (95.8%) were assessable for response. The median time to progression was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.4-5.4 months) and the median overall survival was 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.6-12.1 months). Partial response was confirmed in 11 of 48 cases (22.9%; 95% CI: 10.9-34.9%) and no complete responses were seen. Significant hematologic toxicity was noted with grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 21.7 and 4.3% of patients, respectively, as well as grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurring in 4.3% of patients. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 6.5% of the patients. There were no treatment-related deaths during on the study. In summary, docetaxel and oxaliplatin have modest activity with predictable hematologic toxicity when given as salvage therapy for Chinese patients treated earlier for AGC. Given the short duration of response more focus should be given to newer biologic agents and triplet regimens.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗多药耐药的晚期乳腺癌的临床观察

目的观察吉西他滨联合顺铂方案治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药晚期乳腺癌的疗效与安全性。方法2007年1月～2008年4月以吉西他滨联合顺铂方案治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药晚期乳腺癌15例,吉西他滨1000 mg.m-2静滴,第1、8天,顺铂25 mg.m-2,静脉滴注,第1～3天;每21 d为一周期,至少治疗2周期。结果全组患者均可评价疗效,其中完全缓解（CR）1例（6.7%）,部分缓解（PR）6例（40.0%）,稳定（SD）5例（33.3%）,进展（PD）3例（20.0%）,总有效率（ORR）46.7%,TTP6.4月,MST13.2月;Ⅲ～Ⅳ度毒性反应分别为血小板减少20.0%,白细胞减少26.7%,恶心或呕吐13.3%。结论吉西他滨和顺铂联合方案治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药晚期乳腺癌的疗效较好,使用方便,毒性反应较轻,是蒽环类及紫杉类耐药晚期乳腺癌的有效解救治疗方案。     

A Phase II study of celecoxib,gemcitabine, and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer

Summary Background. Pancreatic cancer is amongst the most chemoresistant malignancies. Expression of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme plays a major role in tumor progression and resistance to therapy. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the effect of gemcitabine by fixed-dose rate infusion (FDR), cisplatin and the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, on the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods. The eligibility criteria included a pathologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² over 100 minutes, cisplatin 35 mg/m² I.V. on days 1 and 8, and celecoxib continuously at a daily dose of 800 mg. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results. Twenty-two patients with metastatic pancreas cancer were enrolled (median age, 59.5 years; M:F, 13:9). The median number of cycles was 2 per patient. The median survival time was 5.8 months (90% CI, 3.6–7.6 months). The probability of survival at 6 months was 46% (90% CI, 27–62%). The major toxicity was neutropenia with grade 3 or 4 toxicities seen in 65% of patients. Conclusions. The addition of celecoxib to gemcitabine (by FDR) and cisplatin did not appear to increase activity of the chemotherapy doublet in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Celecoxib alone may not be sufficient to sensitize pancreatic cancer to the effects of conventional cytotoxic therapy.     

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the Central Japan Lung Study Group trial 0404

Although S-1 has been shown to have activity against advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its efficacy for elderly patients remains unclear. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Chemotherapy-na?ve patients aged 70 years or older with stages IIIB to IV or postoperative NSCLC and performance status 1 or lower were eligible. Patients received S-1 approximately equivalent to 80 mg/m/day for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Twenty-nine patients were eligible. The median age was 78 years (range, 70-85 years). The overall response rate and the disease control rate were 27.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.3-43.9%] and 65.5% (95% CI: 48.2-82.8%), respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 4.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-9.8 months). The median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI: 13.8-25.5 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 53.6%. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. The only hematological toxicity of grade 3 was anemia in 6.9% of patients. The grade 3 nonhematological toxicities included hyponatremia, anorexia, nausea, oral mucositis, and diarrhea in 3.4% of patients and infection in 6.9% of patients. S-1 monotherapy was effective and well tolerated as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. The results of this study warrant further investigations of this regimen, including a randomized controlled trial.     

Scheduled administration of low dose irinotecan before gemcitabine in the second line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study

We had previously demonstrated that low dose irinotecan (CPT-11) leads to increased accumulation of cells in S-phase and shows a therapeutic synergy with S-phase specific chemotherapy such as gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. In this phase II study, our objectives were to evaluate the tolerability and activity of low dose CPT-11 followed 24 h later by gemcitabine as second line therapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CPT-11 (60 mg/m) was administered 24 h before gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 every 3 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. The median follow-up was 7.4 months. Partial response (PR) was seen in two (6.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.009-0.228). PR and stable disease were seen in 22 patients (75.9, 95% CI: 0.564-0.897). The median survival time was 13.8 months (95% CI: 8.1-19.3). The median time to progression was 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-6.2). Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for toxicity. Neutropenia (grade 3 or 4) was observed in 27 patients (71%). Eight patients did not receive cycle 2 of therapy owing to prolonged neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Scheduled administration of low dose CPT-11, 24 h before gemcitabine in the second line therapy of NSCLC yielded comparable disease control rates (PR and stable disease) when compared with other studies using the two chemotherapy drugs in the traditional sequence. However, this approach was associated with higher grade 3/4 neutropenia and is not recommended for further study in metastatic NSCLC.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.     

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line biweekly therapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate objective response rate, survival and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine-docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule as first-line treatment in advanced/relapsed or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Treatment consisted of the sequenced administration of gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (2 h intravenous infusion) on days 1, 14 of a 28-day cycle for 6 months. A total of 33 patients, 22 men and 11 women, were enrolled, aged 41-75 years (median 64 years). The majority of patients had a good performance status (94%; status<2). Thirteen patients had locally advanced disease (39%) and 20 metastasic disease (41%). A total of 178 treatment cycles were administered with a median number of 5.4 cycles for a patients (range 2-8). Toxicity was primarily hematologic with the most frequent grade >2 being neutropenia (11%), with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were milder and had a lower incidence. The most frequent nonhematological toxicities were alopecia, followed by asthenia. Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity was minimal. No toxic deaths were recorded during study and follow-up. Overall response rate was 53.1%, including four complete responses (12.5%) and 13 partial responses (40.6%), whereas six patients (18.8%) had disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-13.7), with a median survival of 14.8 months (95% confidence interval: 9.4-20.2) after an observation of 30 months (range 4-30+). The results of this study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel administered twice a week is particularly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Once data are confirmed in a larger study and longer follow-up, the favorable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative to the cisplatin-based regimen.     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine (GV) versus cisplatin, gemcitabine and vinorelbine (CGV) as first-line treatment in advanced non small cell lung cancer: Results of a prospective randomized phase II study

The objective of this study was to assess whether adding cisplatin to gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination improves the clinical outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced NSCLC; age < or = 75 years: Karnofsky performance status > or = 60%, and with adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were randomized into 2 treatment groups to receive Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 (GV group), or cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (CGV group). All drugs were administered on days 1 and 8 every three weeks: From September 1999 to March 2003, 114 patients were enrolled. No statistically significant difference was observed in GV vs CGV group in objective response (37 versus 47%, respectively; P = 0.5), median time to progression (5 versus 5.8 months; P = 0.6), overall survival (9 versus 10 months; P = 0.9) and 1-year survival (26 versus 28%; P = 0.9). Conversely, toxicities were significantly higher for CGV, including grade 3-4 neutropenia (24 versus 45%); neutropenic fever (4 versus 14%, including one toxic death); grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (2 versus 14%); and grade 3-4 emesis (2 versus 14%). Our results suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is less toxic than three-drug combination with cisplatin while showing similar efficacy.     

Feasibility of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma and a performance status of 2

The use of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is well documented in selected patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC), but little is known on the feasibility of systemic treatments in patients with a performance status (PS) of 2. We retrospectively examined the medical records of consecutive BTC patients with a PS of 2 receiving gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks from January 2003 to December 2011 in our institution. Body composition was analysed by computed tomography scan to detect sarcopenia. The primary evaluation criterion was safety. The secondary evaluation criteria were the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Twenty-eight patients (median age: 63 years, range 41-83) received a total of 175 cycles (median per patient: 6, range 2-12). Ten patients (35.7%) had sarcopenia on the pretreatment computed tomography scan. The most frequent toxicities were thrombocytopenia (grades 2-4: n=4, 14.3%), peripheral neuropathy (grades 2-3: n=9, 32.1%) and cholangitis (n=4, 14.3%). The best response was a partial response in 10.7% of patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-22.2] and stable disease in 42.9% of patients. The median PFS and OS were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.5-6.3) and 7.5 (95% CI: 5.2-9.5) months, respectively. The median PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients without sarcopenia: 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.4-8.0) vs. 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.0-2.5), P less than 0.01, and 10.4 months (95% CI: 7.5-11.6) vs. 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.7-5.2), P less than 0.01, respectively. In our experience, gemcitabine-oxaliplatin was feasible and induced effective palliation in PS2 patients with advanced BTC. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.     

吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察

目的评价吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素（恩度）治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法 38例病理确诊的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者给予吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗,吉西他滨1000mg/m2,第1,8天,顺铂75mg/m2,第2天,恩度注射液7.5mg/m2加入500ml生理盐水中,滴注时间3～4小时,第1～14日,每21天为一周期。结果 38例患者入组,部分缓解13例,疾病稳定17例,疾病进展8例,客观有效率为34.2%,疾病控制率为78.9%。本组中位无进展生存期为4.6个月,95%CI为2.600～6.600个月,中位生存期为13.5个月,95%CI为9.599～17.401个月,1年生存率42.1%。结论吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,有较好的疗效和安全性,具有较好临床应用前景。     

Mitomycin C continuous infusion as salvage chemotherapy in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer

Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and therapeutic activity of continuously infused mitomycin C in patients with recurring or progressive metastatic gastric cancer following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were treated with mitomycin C 20 mg/m2 i.v. over a time period of 120 h followed by a 3-week rest period. All patients received prednisone 50 mg p.o. prophylactically for 5 days to prevent hemolytic uremic syndrome and pulmonary side effects. Twenty-two consecutively enrolled patients were assessable for toxicity and 20 for response evaluation completing at least one full course of chemotherapy (two patients evaluable but not measurable). Patient characteristics: median age: 63 years (39-76); Sex (M/ F): 13/9; median Karnofsky status: 70% (50-100%); resection of primary tumor n = 12 (55%); sites of metastases: liver n = 17 (77%), locally advanced n = 10 (45%), peritoneum n = 13 (59%), lungs n=5 (23%), bone n=3 (14%) and lymph nodes n=14 (64%). Previous chemotherapy regimens: bolus 5-FU/folinic acid n=6 (27%), ELF n=4 (18%), EAP n=3 (14%) and continuous 5-FU/folinic acid/cisplatin/paclitaxel n=9 (41%). In 20 evaluable patients one complete and five partial remissions were observed; overall response rate 30.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1-50.9%] with a median response duration of 2.1 months (range: 2-6). The median survival was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.1-6.0) resulting in a 6-month survival rate of 30% since start of mitomycin C. WHO grade III/IV mucositis, diarrhea and fever/infection occurred in 9% of patients each. Cumulative thrombo- and leukocytopenia (WHO grade II/IV) were observed in four and two patients, respectively. Treatment had to be stopped early in two patients. No severe renal dysfunction, pulmonary toxicity or evidence of hemolytic uremic syndrome was observed. Fatigue during the 120 h infusion of mitomycin C was common (11 of 22 patients). We conclude that continuous infusion of mitomycin C is feasible on an outpatient basis, revealing an acceptable toxicity. Mitomycin C demonstrates single-agent activity in pretreated gastric cancer, but has only limited efficacy following cisplatin/paclitaxel-based first-line chemotherapy.     

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma

This study aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX regimen) in patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). Thirty-three eligible patients with previously untreated SBA received 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, together with 400 mg/m(2) of leucovorin over 2 h, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. A median of nine cycles (range 3-18) was administered. The objective response rate was 48.5% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31-67%], with one complete response, 15 partial responses, 12 stable diseases, and five progressions. The median time to progression was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.0-9.6) and the median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 11.0-19.4). Toxicity was fairly mild. Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (12.1%), thrombocytopenia (3.0%), nausea (6.1%), vomiting (3.0%), diarrhea (3.0%), peripheral neuropathy (9.1%), and fatigue (3.0%), and grade 4 toxicities occurred in none of the patients. The modified FOLFOX regimen is highly active and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for advanced SBA patients.