Facilitation of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The administration of haloperidol in both the preexposure and the conditioning stages was found to enhance LI in the conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure (Weiner and Feldon, 1986). The present experiments investigated the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol administration on LI in a two-way avoidance procedure, consisting of two stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; and conditioning, in which the animals acquired a two-way avoidance response with the tone serving as the warning signal. Experiments 1 and 2 tested whether the administration of haloperidol confirmed to the preexposure stage, where learning to ignore the nonreinforced stimulus takes place, would suffice to enhance the LI effect. In Experiment 1, preexposure and conditioning were conducted 24 hr apart. LI was obtained in both the placebo and haloperidol conditions, but the effect was not more pronounced under the drug. In addition, haloperidol-treated animals exhibited impaired avoidance performance. In Experiment 2, preexposure and conditioning were given 72 hr apart. With this interval, haloperidol did not affect avoidance performance. However, also under these conditions, the magnitude of the LI effect was not larger in the haloperidol-treated groups, indicating that the administration of the drug in the preexposure stage alone did not suffice to enhance LI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Latent inhibition is not affected by acute or chronic administration of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which animals learn to ignore a repeatedly presented stimulus not followed by meaningful consequences. We previously reported that LI was disrupted following the administration of 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine. The present experiments investigated the effects of 6 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on LI in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, the drug was administered in a 2×2 design, i.e. drug-no drug in pre-exposure and drug-no drug in conditioning. LI was obtained in all conditions. In Experiment 2, animals were given either 5 days of 6 mg/kg amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure and conditioning or 7 days of saline. LI was not obtained under amphetamine, but this outcome reflected a state-dependency effect. In Experiment 3, animals received either 5 days of amphetamine pretreatment and amphetamine in pre-exposure, conditioning and test or 8 days of saline. LI was obtained in both the placebo and amphetamine conditions. Experiments 4a and 4b compared the effects of two drug doses, 1.5 (4a) and 6 mg/kg (4b), administered in pre-exposure and conditioning. LI was abolished with the 1.5 mg/kg dose but not with the 6 mg/kg dose.     

Phencyclidine does not disrupt latent inhibition in rats: implications for animal models of schizophrenia.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which prior exposure to a stimulus not followed by reinforcement retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects a process of learning to ignore, or tune out, irrelevant stimuli. Three experiments investigated the effects of phencyclidine (PCP) on LI. The investigation was carried out using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. The three stages were conducted 24 h apart. In Experiment 1, 1 mg/kg PCP was administered either in the preexposure or in the conditioning stage or in both. Experiment 2 used 5 mg/kg PCP in the same procedure. In Experiment 3, 5 mg/kg PCP was administered throughout the LI procedure, including the test stage. In all three experiments, PCP did not affect LI. The implications of these findings for the development of animal models of schizophrenia are discussed.     

The sigma ligand BMY-14802 as a potential antipsychotic: evidence from the latent inhibition model in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously-presented nonreinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this test paradigm: to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to enhance LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of a potential antipsychotic, sigma ligand BMY-14802. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1, 20 tone preexposures and two conditioning trials were given and the effects of 5, 15, and 30mg/kg BMY-14802 were assessed. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using ten preexposures and two conditioning trials. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of 15 and 30mg/kg on LI using 40 preexposures and extended conditioning consisting of five tone-shock pairings. Experiments 4 and 5 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 15 and 30mg/kg BMY-14802, respectively. BMY-14802 was found to antagonise amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and enhance LI when low numbers of preexposures and two conditioning trials were given, but not following extended conditioning. These results provide partial support for the suggestion that BMY-14802 may possess antipsychotic properties.     

Antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition by the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine in rats

The present study aimed at characterising the effects of the new antipsychotic olanzapine in a Latent Inhibition (LI) paradigm. A conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure was used, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was presented six times without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired twice with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was assessed by the suppression of licking during the tone presentation. In Experiment I, it was found that pre-treatment with an intermediate dose (0.312mg/kg) of olanzapine, but not with lower (0.003; 0.031mg/kg) or higher doses (0.625; 1.25mg/kg), restored LI in amphetamine-treated (1.5mg/kg) animals. This effect could not be attributed to a disruptive effect of olanzapine on CER learning, as olanzapine per se had no effect on this conditioning (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, olanzapine did not antagonise the amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity. As olanzapine has not only dopaminergic, but also serotonergic, adrenergic, histaminergic and cholinergic activities, the differential effects of olanzapine on amphetamine-induced disruption of LI and hyperactivity may reflect an action on several pharmacological targets, possibly interacting with one another.     

Abolition of the acquisition but not the expression of latent inhibition by chlordiazepoxide in rats

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, prior nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus when it is paired with reinforcement. The development of LI reflects learning not to attend to, or ignore, stimuli which predict no significant consequences. The present experiment tested the effects of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on LI using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure consisting of three stages given 24 hr apart: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus, tone, was presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with shock; and test, where LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Preexposure and conditioning were given off-baseline. CDP (5 mg/kg) was administered only in preexposure, only in conditioning, in both stages or in neither. The administration of the drug during tone-shock conditioning conducted off-baseline markedly reduced animals' suppression to the tone in a subsequent licking test which was conducted without the drug. The administration of CDP during nonreinforced preexposure to the tone abolished the development of LI, i.e., drug-treated preexposed animals did not show reduced suppression as compared to drug-treated nonpreexposed animals. These results demonstrate that CDP: a) blocks the acquisition of classically conditioned fear and b) disrupts animals' ability to learn that stimuli predict no significant outcomes.     

The effects of the new antipsychotic, sertindole, on latent inhibition in rats

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously presented non-reinforced stimulus, that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs are known to produce two effects in this paradigm: to antagonize amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and to facilitate the development of LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects on LI of the new neuroleptic, sertindole. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (a tone) was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the pre-exposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In Experiment 1 the effects of 0.31, 1.3 and 5.0mg/kg sertindole were assessed following pre-exposure to 40 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 2 tested the effects of 5mg/kg on LI following pre-exposure to 10 non-reinforced tones. Experiment 3 investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 5.0mg/kg sertindole. The results demonstrated that sertindole (5.0mg/kg) possesses a neuroleptic-like profile in the LI model: it facilitates the development of LI and antagonizes amphetamine-induced disruption of LI.     

Disruption and potentiation of latent inhibition by risperidone: the latent inhibition model of atypical antipsychotic action.

Latent inhibition (LI), that is, retarded conditioning to a stimulus following its nonreinforced pre-exposure, is impaired in some subsets of schizophrenia patients and in amphetamine-treated rats. Potentiation of LI by antipsychotic drugs (APDs) given in conditioning, under conditions that do not lead to LI in controls, is a well-established index of antipsychotic activity. Recently, we have shown that the atypical APD, clozapine, in addition disrupts LI if administered in pre-exposure, under conditions that lead to LI in controls. This study demonstrates the same behavioral profile for the atypical APD risperidone. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone previously paired with a foot shock in rats that received nonreinforced exposure to the tone prior to conditioning (pre-exposed (PE)) and rats for whom the tone was novel (non-pre-exposed (NPE)). We show that under conditions that did not yield LI in vehicle controls (40 pre-exposures and five conditioning trials), risperidone (0.25, 0.5, and 1.2 mg/kg) led to LI when administered in conditioning. Under conditions that led to LI in vehicle controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials), risperidone (0.25, 0.5, and 2.5 mg/kg) abolished LI when administered in pre-exposure; the latter effect was not evident with haloperidol. In addition, the effects of risperidone administered in both the pre-exposure and conditioning stages were dose-dependent so that the pre-exposure-based action was manifested at lower but not at higher doses. It is concluded that atypical APDs exert in the LI model a dual pattern of effects, which enables detection of their 'typical' action (conditioning-based LI potentiation) as well as a dissociation from typical APDs by their 'atypical' action (pre-exposure-based LI disruption). It is suggested that the former and latter effects are subserved by D2 and 5HT2A antagonism, respectively.     

Haloperidol potentiation of latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role at conditioning rather than pre-exposure

Latent inhibition (LI) reflects a cognitive process whereby repeated pre-exposure of a to-be-conditioned stimulus impairs subsequent conditioning. Since it is believed to reflect the ability of an organism to screen out irrelevant stimuli, disrupted LI has been suggested as a model for a cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. Animal studies have previously shown that indirect dopamine (DA) agonists can disrupt LI, an effect which is reversed by neuroleptics. Conversely, neuroleptics given alone potentiate LI. In this study, using pre-exposure to a tone stimulus which is subsequently paired with mild footshock, we have demonstrated that haloperidol given before conditioning only is equally as effective as haloperidol given twice, before pre-exposure and conditioning, in potentiating LI after 10 pre-exposures. This supports our earlier results with nicotine, pointing to conditioning as the critical time for the action of dopaminergic manipulations on LI. The implications for the use of potentiated LI as a screening test for neuroleptic action are discussed.     

Abolition of the expression but not the acquisition of latent inhibition by chronic amphetamine in rats

The animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia has been based primarily on stereotyped behavior. The present study sought to demonstrate an amphetamine-induced deficit in attentional processes. To this end, the effects of acute and chronic (14 days) 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administration on the ability of rats to ignore irrelevant stimuli were examined using the paradigm of latent inhibition (LI) in a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. The procedure consisted of three stages: pre-exposure, in which the to-be-conditoned stimulus, tone, was presented without being followed by reinforcement; acquisition, in which the pre-exposed tone was paired with shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' suppression of licking during tone presentation. Experiment 1 showed that chronic but not acute treatment abolished LI. Experiment 2 showed that animals receiving chronic amphetamine pretreatment but pre-exposed and conditioned without the drug, exhibited normal LI. In Experiment 3, animals which received chronic amphetamine pretreatment and were pre-exposed under the drug but conditioned without it, also showed normal LI. The implications of these results for the animal amphetamine model of schizophrenia are discussed.     

Reduced dopamine function within the medial shell of the nucleus accumbens enhances latent inhibition

Latent inhibition (LI) manifests as poorer conditioning to a CS that has previously been presented without consequence. There is some evidence that LI can be potentiated by reduced mesoaccumbal dopamine (DA) function but the locus within the nucleus accumbens of this effect is as yet not firmly established. Experiment 1 tested whether 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced lesions of DA terminals within the core and medial shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) would enhance LI under conditions that normally disrupt LI in controls (weak pre-exposure). LI was measured in a thirst motivated conditioned emotional response procedure with 10 pre-exposures (to a noise CS) and 2 conditioning trials. The vehicle-injected and core-lesioned animals did not show LI and conditioned to the pre-exposed CS at comparable levels to the non-pre-exposed controls. 6-OHDA lesions to the medial shell, however, produced potentiation of LI, demonstrated across two extinction tests. In a subsequent experiment, haloperidol microinjected into the medial shell prior to conditioning similarly enhanced LI. These results underscore the dissociable roles of core and shell subregions of the NAc in mediating the expression of LI and indicate that reduced DA function within the medial shell leads to enhanced LI.     

Restoration of latent inhibition by olanzapine but not haloperidol in entorhinal cortex-lesioned rats

RATIONALE: Latent inhibition (LI) refers to the decrease in conditioned response induced by the repeated non-reinforced pre-exposure to the conditioned stimulus before its pairing with the unconditioned stimulus during the conditioning stage. LI has been considered as a relevant animal model for the study of the biological bases of schizophrenia. LI has recently been demonstrated to depend on the integrity of the entorhinal cortex, as lesioning of this area disrupted LI. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to verify whether the classical neuroleptic haloperidol and/or the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine would prevent the effect of entorhinal cortex lesioning. METHODS: LI was studied in an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) paradigm in which a tone is paired with a footshock. Entorhinal cortex lesions were produced by the electrolytic method. After a recovery period, both lesioned and control rats received either haloperidol (0.3 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle before both the pre-exposure and conditioning stages of the experiment. RESULTS: In control rats, pre-exposure to the tone induced LI, which was affected by neither haloperidol nor olanzapine. Lesioning of the entorhinal cortex produced a deficit of LI, which was restored by olanzapine but not by haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: This result suggests a dissociation of the anatomical and pharmacological targets of the two drugs. The possible involvement of dopamine D3 receptors in the effects of olanzapine is discussed.     

Systemic administration of MK-801 produces an abnormally persistent latent inhibition which is reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol

Abstract Rationale. Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential pre-exposure, and disrupted LI in the rat is considered to model an attentional deficit in schizophrenia. Blockade of NMDA receptor transmission, which produces behavioral effects potentially relevant to schizophrenic symptomatology in several animal models, has been reported to spare LI. Objectives. To show that systemic administration of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 will lead to an abnormally persistent LI which will emerge under conditions that disrupt LI in controls, and that this will be reversed by the atypical neuroleptic clozapine but not by the typical neuroleptic haloperidol, as found for other NMDA antagonist-induced models. Methods. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats which previously received 0 (non-pre-exposed) or 40 tone exposures (pre-exposed) followed by two (experiment 1) or five (experiments 2–5) tone – foot shock pairings. Results. MK-801 at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg reduced conditioned suppression while no effect on suppression was seen at the 0.05 mg/kg dose. At the latter dose, intact LI was seen with parameters that produced LI in controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials). Raising the number of conditioning trials to five disrupted LI in control rats, but MK-801-treated rats continued to show LI, and this abnormally persistent LI was due to the action of MK-801 in the conditioning stage. MK-801-induced LI perseveration was unaffected by both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) administered in conditioning, and was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol administered in pre-exposure. Conclusion. MK-801-induced perseveration of LI is consistent with other reports of perseverative behaviors, suggested to be particularly relevant to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, following NMDA receptor blockade. We suggest that LI perseveration may model impaired attentional set shifting associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Moreover, the finding that the action of MK-801 on LI and the action of clozapine are exerted in different stages of the LI procedure suggests that the MK-801-based LI model may provide a unique screening tool for the identification of novel antipsychotic compounds, whereby the schizophrenia-mimicking LI abnormality is drug-induced, but the detection of the antipsychotic action is not dependent on the mechanism of action of the pro-psychotic drug. Electronic Publication     

Clozapine-induced potentiation of latent inhibition is due to its action in the conditioning stage: implications for the mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its non-reinforced pre- exposure. LI is impaired in some subsets of schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) potentiate LI under conditions that are insufficient to produce LI in control animals, namely, low number of pre-exposures or high number of conditioning trials. The present experiments tested the proposition that LI potentiation under both conditions stems from the action of APDs in the conditioning stage. Experiments 1-3 used 10 pre-exposures and 2 conditioning trials, and tested the effects of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg clozapine, respectively. Experiments 4-6 used 40 pre-exposures and 5 conditioning trials, with clozapine doses as above. Clozapine was administered in either the pre-exposure, the conditioning stage, or in both. In all the experiments, vehicle controls did not show LI. Overall, clozapine administration in conditioning, irrespective of drug condition in pre-exposure, produced LI. The implications of these results for the mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs are discussed.     

7-OH-DPAT effects on latent inhibition: low dose facilitation but high dose blockade: implications for dopamine receptor involvement in attentional processes

7-OH-DPAT is a dopamine D2/D3 agonist, which at low doses acts preferentially on D3 receptors but at high doses it acts on D2 and D3 receptors. The present study investigated the contribution of D3 and D2 receptors on latent inhibition (LI) by using two dose levels of 7-OH-DPAT: a low dose, 0.1 mg/kg (D3 receptor activation) and a high dose, 1.0 mg/kg, (D2/D3 receptor activation) in a conditioned emotional response (CER) paradigm. The LI Protocols included CS pre-exposure (10 or 40 CS alone trials), CER induction and a non-drug CER test phase. Additionally, the drug effects upon CER acquisition without LI were assessed using the same treatments and test environment pre-exposure protocols but without the tone CS. The effects of 7-OH-DPAT on crossing, rearing and grooming were also measured in an open field 1 day after the CER test phase. The results showed that the low dose 7-OH-DPAT treatment potentiated LI at 10 but not at 40 CS pre-exposures. The high dose 7-OH-DPAT treatment blocked LI at both the 10 and 40 stimulus pre-exposures; and it also induced hyperactivity. Thus, D3 stimulation induced by a low dose of 7-OH-DPAT can facilitate LI but these effects are contingent upon and are specific to the number of stimulus presentations. Altogether, these findings indicate that D3 stimulation can enhance attentional processes, but D2 stimulation can impair attentional processes.     

Disruption of latent inhibition by acute administration of low doses of amphetamine

In the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, nonreinforced preexposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. Three experiments investigated the effects of acute amphetamine administration on LI in rats. Experiments 1 and 3 used a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure and Experiment 2 used two-way active avoidance procedure. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that, in both the CER and avoidance procedures, 1.5 mg/kg dl-amphetamine administered either in the preexposure or the conditioning stage alone did not disrupt LI. In contrast, amphetamine administered in both of the stages abolished LI. Experiment 3 showed that the abolition of LI was obtained when the preexposure and conditioning were given 24 hr apart but not when the two stages were given in one session.     

Long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males: possible involvement of the dopaminergic system

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioral paradigm in which nonreinforced pre-exposure to a stimulus retards subsequent conditioning to that stimulus. The development of LI is considered to reflect learning not to attend to, or ignore, irrelevant stimuli. In our previous studies investigating the effects of early handling on LI, we have shown that normal LI was obtained in handled males and females, as well as in nonhandled females. In contrast, nonhandled males failed to show LI. This finding pointed to a long-term attentional deficit in nonhandled males. Since there is evidence that the development of LI is mediated by the dopaminergic system, the present experiments tested the possibility that the attentional deficit of nonhandled males may be related to a dopaminergic dysfunction. Experiment 1 tested whether the administration of haloperidol, which was shown to enhance LI in normal animals, would reinstate the LI effect in nonhandled males. Infantile handled (Days 1–22) and nonhandled male and female rats were tested in maturity in the LI paradigm, using a conditioned emotional response procedure. Experiment 2 tested the locomotor response of handled and nonhandled males to 0.3, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Experiment 1 showed that handled males, handled females and nonhandled females showed a normal LI effect, whereas nonhandled males failed to develop LI. Haloperidol enhanced LI in all the groups, but this effect was most dramatic in nonhandled males, in which the drug reinstated LI. Experiment 2 showed that nonhandled males exhibited a reduced locomotor response to d-amphetamine.     

Disruption of the US pre-exposure effect and latent inhibition in two-way active avoidance by systemic amphetamine in C57BL/6 mice

RATIONALE: Pre-exposure to either one of the two to-be-associated stimuli alone is known to reduce the efficiency of the learning of their association when they are subsequently paired explicitly. In classical conditioning, pre-exposure to the conditioned stimulus (CS) gives rise to latent inhibition (LI); and pre-exposure to the unconditioned stimulus (US) results in the US pre-exposure effect (USPEE). Considerable evidence supports an important role of central dopamine in the regulation and modulation of LI; it has been suggested that the USPEE may be similarly controlled by dopamine, but this parallelism has only been directly demonstrated in the conditioned taste aversion paradigm. OBJECTIVE: The present study tested this hypothesis by comparing the efficacy of systemic amphetamine treatment to affect the expression of LI and the USPEE in a two-way active avoidance paradigm. METHODS: C57BL/6 male mice were tested in active avoidance using a tone CS and a foot-shock US. Twenty-four hours before, they were pre-exposed to 100 presentations of the CS or the US, or to the test apparatus only. Amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg) or saline was administered before stimulus pre-exposure and conditioned avoidance test, in which the mice learned to avoid the shock by shuttling in response to the tone. RESULTS: Amphetamine disrupted both stimulus pre-exposure effects, thus, lending further support to the hypothesis that the USPEE is similar to LI in its sensitivity to dopamine receptor agonist. Hence, the USPEE paradigm may represent a valuable addition to the study of dopamine-sensitive processes of selective learning currently implicated in LI and Kamin blocking.     

Parametric and pharmacological modulations of latent inhibition in mouse inbred strains

Latent inhibition (LI) is a cross species selective attention phenomenon, which is disrupted by amphetamine and enhanced by antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Accumulating data of LI in gene-modified mice as well as in mouse inbred strains suggest genetic component of LI. Here we study modulation of LI in mouse inbred strains with spontaneously disrupted LI by parametric manipulations (number of pre-exposures and conditioning trials) and pharmacological treatments with antipsychotics and NMDA modulator, D-serine. C3H/He and CBA/J inbred mice showed disrupted LI under conditions with 40 pre-exposures (PE) and 2 trials of the conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) due to either loss of the pre-exposure effect or a ceiling effect of poor learning, respectively. The increased number of pre-exposures and/or number of conditioning trials corrected expression of LI in these inbred mice. The disrupted LI was also reversed by haloperidol in both inbred strains at 1.2 mg/kg but not at 0.4 mg/kg, as well as by clozapine (at 3 mg/kg in C3H/He and at 9 mg/kg in CBA/J mice). D-serine potentiated LI in C3H/He mice at 600 mg/kg, but not in the CBA/J at both studied doses (600 and 1800 mg/kg). Desipramine (10 mg/kg) had no effect on LI in both inbred mouse strains. Our findings demonstrated some resemblance between the effects of parametric and pharmacological manipulations on LI, suggesting that APDs may affect the capacity of the brain processes environmental stimuli in LI. Taken together, LI may offer a translational strategy that allows prediction of drug efficacy for cognitive impairments in schizophrenia.     

The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning

In an attempt to understand some inconsistent findings, the present experiment investigated the effects of pimozide, a dopamine (DA) receptor blocker, on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning. In Experiment 1, rats received three phases of training in a two-lever box. The pre-exposure phase measured the operant rates of pressing the levers; one produced a 3-s tone and the other turned the lights off for 3 s. In the conditioning phase, with the levers absent, the light-off stimulus was paired with food for two or four sessions. The test phase again measured the rate of pressing the levers. Conditioned reinforcement was shown by a relative increase in responding on the light lever during the test. Of the groups receiving four conditioning sessions, pimozide (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent attenuation of conditioned reinforcement, those rats treated with 4.0 mg/kg failing to demonstrate a significant effect. When 2 conditioning days were employed, pimozide treatment also produced a dose-dependent attenuation; however, in these less conditioned animals 2.0 mg/kg blocked the effect. The possibility that pimozide produced a conditioned taste aversion to the food was ruled out in Experiment 2. These data suggest that DA transmission may be necessary for the establishment of conditioned reinforcement and that the effects of receptor blockade may be related to the amount of conditioning.