Postoperative chemoradiotherapy for high-risk head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To describe the use of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with either weekly cisplatin or carboplatin, for high-risk head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in a single institutional setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1999 and January 2003, 47 patients were treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients, 41 (87%) had Stage III-IV disease. The predominant primary site was the oral cavity in 24 patients (51%), 27 had nodal disease with extracapsular extension, and 26 had positive or close mucosal margins (<5 mm). Ten patients had undergone resection of recurrent disease after previous surgery. Twenty-seven (57%) were treated with cisplatin, and the remaining patients received carboplatin because of contraindications to cisplatin. The median radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy (range, 50-66 Gy). Of the 47 patients, 45 (96%) completed at least four of the six planned doses of chemotherapy and 45 (96%) completed the planned course of radiotherapy. Nineteen patients (40%) had confluent mucositis, eight (17%) had Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity, and four (9%) had febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The estimated 2-year locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rate was 73%, 56%, and 62%, respectively. Excluding the 10 patients with recurrence after previous surgery, the locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rate was 81%, 64%, and 71%, respectively. Five cases of Grade 3-4 late treatment-related sequelae developed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with postoperative concurrent weekly cisplatin or carboplatin and radiotherapy was reasonably well tolerated. Acute and late toxicity was acceptable. The overall results achieved are comparable with the preliminary results of recent randomized trials. Patients treated after resection of recurrent disease (after previous surgery alone) fared worse than those treated at the initial resection.     

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 35 patients with locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma referred to our department between March 1994 and November 2002. Most patients were male (77%), Chinese (97%), and had undifferentiated carcinoma (89%). Most had extensive locally recurrent Stage rT3-T4 disease (66%) with a median age at recurrence of 49 years (range, 35-69 years). A repeat course of radiotherapy was given concurrently with cisplatin, with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil as consolidation treatment. Significant morbidities were present, including cranial nerve palsies due to extensive recurrent local disease before treatment of the recurrence. RESULTS: The response rate to concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 58% (29% complete response and 29% partial response). The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rate, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 15% and 26%, respectively. Only 3 patients developed systemic metastases. Grade 3-4 acute toxicities included emesis (9%) and neutropenia (14%), and Grade 3-4 late toxicities consisted of temporal lobe necrosis (3%), cranial neuropathy (6%), and endocrine abnormalities (14%). CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is feasible in a selected group of patients with locoregional recurrent NPC, but the risk of major late toxicities is significant.     

Late chemo-intensification with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil as an adjunct to radiotherapy: a pragmatic approach for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to define the feasibility of a late chemo-intensification treatment regimen with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (70 Gy/7 weeks). Seventy four patients with Stage III and IV biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were treated with this regimen. Chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion of 5-FU at 350 mg/m(2)/day and cisplatin as 1h infusion at 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 of week 6 and 7 of radiotherapy. Grade III mucositis was present in 48 (64.9%) patients. After surgical salvage 59 (79.7%) patients had overall complete response. Locoregional control rate at 3 year was 80.8%. Three year locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was 63.1%, 66.7% and 44.4%, respectively. The late chemo-intensification regimen was feasible in terms of response rate, toxicity and survival functions.     

Alternating chemoradiotherapy versus partly accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low-total-dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the same chemoradiotherapy approach with high-total-dose partly accelerated radiotherapy. METHODS: During 6 years, 136 consecutive patients with previously untreated unfavorable Stage II or Stage III-IV (International Union Against Cancer) SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) of body surface area per day for 5 consecutive days) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days; weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) alternated with three 2-week courses of radiotherapy (20 grays [Gy] per course, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week; ALT, 70 patients) or to partly accelerated radiotherapy with final concomitant boost technique (75 Gy/40 fractions in 6 weeks; partly accelerated radiotherapy [PA-RT], 66 patients). RESULTS: At the median follow-up of 60 months (range, 30-102 months), no statistical differences were observed in overall survival, progression free survival, or locoregional control between the 2 treatments. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and progression free survival were 37% and 35%, respectively, in the ALT group and 29% and 27%, respectively, in PA-RT group. The median overall survival and progression free survival were 24 and 15 months, respectively, in the ALT arm and 18 and 11 months, respectively, in PA-RT arm. Actuarial 3-year locoregional control rates were 32% in the ALT group and 27% in the PA-RT group. At multivariate analysis, tumor classification was the only factor that emerged as a significant independent variable affecting overall survival. Patients treated in the PA-RT arm experienced higher Grade 3+ (World Health Organization) acute skin and mucosal reactions than patients in the ALT arm. Moreover, local late mucosal and skin toxicities occurred more often in patients treated with PA-RT. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to disclose statistically significant differences in the outcome of patients treated with either ALT or PA-RT. Therefore, definitive conclusions could not be made. However, acute skin effects and late mucosal and skin toxicities above the clavicles appeared to be significantly lower with chemoradiotherapy.     

Dose-response relationship for radiation therapy of recurrent, residual, and primarily inoperable colorectal cancer

One hundred and thirteen patients with advanced locoregional recurrent (77), residual (18) or primarily inoperable (18) colorectal carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy. Eighty-five patients had locoregional disease only and 28 had both local disease and distant metastases. The treatment was given with varying dose levels (23-73 Gy) in daily fractions of approximately 2 Gy in 3-8 weeks. This dose variation allowed an evaluation of the dose-response relationship for radiation treatment of this tumour. A good subjective response was obtained in 63%. This effect showed no dose-response relationship except for doses greater than or equal to 56 Gy, where all patients received relief of symptoms. Eighty-two per cent of evaluable patients achieved an objective response (PR 53%, CR 29%). The frequency and duration of the complete responses showed a marked dose-response relationship. Thus, at doses greater than or equal to 56 Gy, a 2-year actuarial complete response rate of 40% was found compared with 7, 4 and 0% at doses of 46-55 Gy, 36-45 Gy and less than or equal to 35 Gy, respectively. The dose-response relationship for local control also influenced the survival rate, although a number of patients died from distant metastases even when local control was obtained. However, with regard to locoregional disease, the 2-year survival was 53% for patients with complete tumour regression but only 8% for patients without complete tumour regression.     

Non-randomized clinical study comparing chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in neoadjuvant therapy for oral cancer

Neoadjuvant therapy plays an important role for organ preservation and survival rate in the treatment of oral cancer. We clinically compared the effect of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with oral cancer. We retrospectively examined 47 patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgery in the oral and maxillofacial surgery department of Ehime University Hospital. We divided them into two groups: radiotherapy alone (24 cases) and chemoradiotherapy (23 cases). The patients in the radiotherapy group underwent irradiation of 32.6 +/- 5.0 Gy (mean +/- SD). The patients in the chemoradiotherapy group received a low-dose fraction of cisplatin (8 mg/mm2/day, 5 days a week; total dose: 139.4 +/- 67.1 mg) and 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/mm2/day, 5 days a week; total dose: 5,900 +/- 1,839.8 mg) combined with simultaneous irradiation of 31.0 +/- 3.2 Gy. None of the 24 patients had a complete response to radiotherapy alone and 12 (50%) had a partial response. Six (26%) of the 23 patients had a complete response to chemoradiotherapy and 12 (52%) had a partial response. The primary control rate (82.6%) to chemoradiotherapy was higher than that (67.5%) to radiotherapy alone although no significant difference was found. The 5-year survival rate was 64.3% in the radiotherapy group and 62.8% in the chemoradiotherapy group. The findings of the present study suggest that while the combination of radiation and cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in neoadjuvant therapy for oral cancer may not bring a significant benefit to improve survival rate, the primary local control rate is improved in comparison with radiotherapy alone.     

Preoperative induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx

BACKGROUND: Combined modality therapy plays a central role in the management of advanced head and neck tumors. The objective of our Phase II study was to determine the feasibility, toxicity, and clinical and pathologic response of preoperative induction chemotherapy, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging of the oral cavity and oropharynx with no distant metastases. METHODS: After staging, 62 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx were treated preoperatively with chemotherapy (1 cycle of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil [P-5FU]) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (3 cycles of P-5FU combined with radiotherapy, 60 grays [Gy] given in 33 fractions of 1.8 Gy). After evaluation, patients underwent surgery either as a diagnostic (biopsy) or therapeutic procedure (resection of the primary tumor and/or the neck). Surgery was performed with the intent to spare organ function. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 mucositis was observed in 37 patients (59%). Overall clinical response was obtained in 87%, and the complete clinical response rate was 50%. Surgery was performed in 53 patients, 50 at the primary tumor site (11 biopsies, 14 marginal excisions, and 25 wide excision) and 46 patients had neck dissection. Pathologic complete remission was observed in 29 patients (46%). After a median follow-up of 39 months, locoregional control rate was 76%, estimated 3-year disease free survival rate was 73% (+/- 4%), and estimated 3-year overall survival rate was 76% (+/- 4%). CONCLUSIONS: This intensive multimodality treatment is feasible, and toxicity is significant but tolerable. The treatment results appear promising and durable. Organ-preserving surgery can be performed in many patients.     

紫杉醇加顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌的临床研究

目的:探讨紫杉醇加顺铂(TP)同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法:48例局部晚期食管癌患者,随机分成两组,每组24例,A组为单纯放疗组,B组为每周紫杉醇加顺铂同步放化疗组。两组均采用6MV或者18MVX射线放射治疗,食管癌原发灶剂量60～68Gy,区域淋巴结剂量50～60Gy。B组放疗同时给予紫杉醇40mg/m2 DDP20mg/m2,均于d1、d8、d15、d22、d29、d36静滴。结果:单纯放疗组和紫杉醇加顺铂组的有效率(CR PR)分别为75%和88%,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。两组的1、3、5年局部无进展生存率分别为60.7%、21.0%和9.5%,71.2%、49.3%和19.2%,两组局部无进展生存率差异有显著性意义(P=0.034);两组的1、3、5年生存率分别为66.7%、25.0%和12.5%,79.2%、58.3%和29.2%,总生存率差异有显著性意义(P=0.041)。同步放化疗组的Ⅲ、Ⅳ级毒副反应高于单纯放疗组。结论:同步放化疗可提高局部晚期食管癌的无进展生存率和总生存率,但毒副反应有增加的趋势。     

Twice-daily reirradiation for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer with gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy

PURPOSE: We previously demonstrated the efficacy of concurrent gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and 5-fluorouracil in conjunction with twice-daily (1.5-Gy) radiotherapy delivered on alternating weeks (TFGX(2)) in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Here, we report the clinical outcome and late toxicity of TFGX(2) in a subset of patients previously irradiated to the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-nine previously irradiated patients, presenting with recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer, underwent TFGX(2). Twelve patients underwent attempted surgical resection before chemoradiotherapy, 10 of whom were left with no measurable disease. Patients with measurable disease received a median radiation dose of 72 Gy; those with no measurable disease received a median dose of 61 Gy. The cumulative dose ranged from 74.4 to 156.4 Gy (mean, 125.7 Gy; median, 131.0 Gy). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 19.1 months (50.9 months for living patients). The 5-year overall survival rate was 34.5%, and the locoregional control rate was 54.5%. In patients with measurable disease at treatment, the 5-year overall survival and locoregional control rate was 26.3% and 45.1%, respectively, compared with 50.0% (p = 0.14) and 70% (p = 0.31), respectively, for those with no measurable disease. Measurable disease and radiation dose were highly statistically significant for overall survival and locoregional control on multivariate analysis. Of 14 patients assessable for late toxicity, 3 developed Grade 4-5, 8 Grade 2-3, and 3 Grade 0-1 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Aggressive reirradiation with chemotherapy in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer provides a chance for long-term cure at the expense of toxicity. Attempted surgical resection before chemoradiotherapy improved disease control and survival.     

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy as primary therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To achieve locoregional control of head and neck cancer, survival, and organ preservation using intensive concomitant chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 28 days, infusional fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days, hydroxyurea 1 g orally every 12 hours for 11 doses, and radiotherapy twice daily at 1.5 Gy/fraction on days 1 through 5 (total dose, 15 Gy). Five days of treatment were followed by 9 days of rest, during which time patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Five cycles (three with cisplatin) were administered over 10 weeks (total radiotherapy dose, locoregional). Surgery after concomitant chemoradiotherapy is feasible. Compliance with adjuvant chemoprevention is poor. Identification of less toxic regimens and improved distant disease control emerge as important future research goals.     

Radiotherapy and concurrent continuous infusion of cisplatin with adjuvant surgery in nonresectable Stage III lung carcinoma: short- and long-term results of a Phase II study.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin-enhanced radiotherapy plus adjuvant surgery was evaluated in nonresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Doses of 50 Gy (administered in standard fractionation in 5 weeks) were delivered with concurrent cisplatin in continuous infusion (daily dose: 4 mg/m2), to 32 Stage IIIa and 45 Stage IIIb patients enrolled in a Phase II study. Patients without progression underwent surgery. RESULTS: Esophagitis (64%), nausea/vomiting (34%), and pulmonary toxicity (14%) were the main side effects. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4 instances. A clinical locoregional major response was achieved by 55 patients (there were 10 complete responses). Forty patients underwent surgery, 7 with a nonradical procedure. Seven patients died due to surgery-related complications, which were significantly impacted by right pneumonectomy (71% vs. 6% of the other procedures, p < 0.0001). Eighteen of the 40 surgical patients were assessed to be without viable tumor and 11 with microresidual carcinoma. There were 13 disease-free, 5-year survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity was low but activity high with the chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant surgery increased the rate of complete responses, but right pneumonectomy had an unacceptable mortality. The role of surgery needs further refinement. Integration of the chemoradiotherapy schedule with cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy is advisable.     

Toxicities and effects of involved-field irradiation with concurrent cisplatin for unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas

PURPOSE: To evaluate local effects and acute toxicities of involved field irradiation with concurrent cisplatin (CDDP) for unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma were treated with chemoradiotherapy. Sixteen were Stage IVA; 17 were Stage IVB. The total prescribed dose of radiotherapy was 50 Gy/25 fractions or 50.4 Gy/28 fractions, using a three-dimensionally determined involved-field that included only the primary tumor and clinically enlarged lymph nodes. Twelve patients received a daily i.v. infusion of CDDP; 21 patients received a combination of CDDP and 5-fluorouracil either i.v. or through the proper hepatic artery. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (82%) patients completed planned chemoradiotherapy. Nausea was the most frequent complaint. No patient experienced Grade 4 toxicities. More than half achieved pain relief. As for the primary site, only 4 patients (12%) achieved a partial response at 4 weeks; however, 3 additional patients attained >50% tumor reduction thereafter. The most frequent site of disease progression was the liver, and only 3 patients developed local progression alone. No regional lymph nodal progression outside the treatment field was seen. Median survival time and survival at 1 year were 7.1 months and 27%, respectively, for the entire group. Difference in overall survival between patients with and without distant metastases was significant (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Involved-field irradiation with concurrent daily CDDP was well tolerated without compromising locoregional effects.     

Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation and cure in patients with advanced head and neck cancer: long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The poor functional outcome in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with surgery and radiation has led to alternative approaches to advanced disease. We conducted a phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in patients with advanced resectable and unresectable (nasopharyngeal) tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with stage III to IV resectable HNSCC and nasopharyngeal tumors received induction chemotherapy with two courses of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d continuous infusion [CI]), fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/d CI), and leucovorin (500 mg/m2/d CI; PFL) for 4 days followed by concurrent therapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 22) and approximately 70 Gy of external-beam radiotherapy. RESULTS: Response to induction chemotherapy included partial response rate of 52% and complete response rate of 24%. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (59%). After cisplatin chemoradiotherapy the complete response rate was 67%. Toxicities of cisplatin chemoradiotherapy consisted of grade 3 or 4 mucositis (79%) and neutropenia (51%). At a median follow-up of 71.5 months, 43% of the patients are still alive and disease-free. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 60%, and the 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 67% and 52%, respectively. Three patients died of second primaries. Late complications of treatment included xerostomia and hoarseness. One patient had persistent dysphagia and required laser epiglotectomy 108 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy with PFL followed by concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy is well tolerated and results in a good likelihood of organ preservation and excellent PFS and OS.     

Preliminary results of radiation dose escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of dose escalation in tumor for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 2000 to June 2004, 50 patients with T3-T4 NPC were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fourteen patients had Stage III and 36 patients had Stage IVA-IVB disease. The prescribed dose was 76 Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV), 70 Gy to planning target volume (PTV), and 72 Gy to enlarged neck nodes (GTVn). All doses were given in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Thirty-four patients also had concurrent cisplatin and induction or adjuvant PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). RESULTS: The average mean dose achieved in GTV, GTVn, and PTV were 79.5 Gy, 75.3 Gy, and 74.6 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months, with 4 recurrences: 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures. All patients with recurrence had IMRT alone without chemotherapy. The 2-year locoregional control rate, distant metastases-free and disease-free survivals were 95.7%, 94.2%, and 93.1%, respectively. One treatment-related death caused by adjuvant chemotherapy occurred. The 2-year overall survival was 92.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 76 Gy in tumor is feasible with T3-T4 NPC and can be combined with chemotherapy. Initial results showed good local control and survival.     

Mitomycin and fluorouracil in combination with concomitant radiotherapy: a potentially curable approach for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy and concurrent mitomycin-C (MC) plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) infusion in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with SCCHN (6 Stage III and 63 Stage IV patients) were treated with external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy) and simultaneous intravenous chemotherapy with 5FU (600 mg/m(2)/day, Days 1-5) and MC (10 mg/m(2), Days 5 and 36). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 28.5 months, 59.4% of patients were alive without disease. Complete response was seen in 76.8% of patients. The 3 years overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival and disease-free survival was 62.3, 63.1[corrected] and 49.5%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated (Grade III mucositis in 43.5% and Grade II leukopenia in 5.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen offers a curative option for our patients where primary and nodal disease is fairly large resulting in hypoxic radioresistant tumors.     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatin for locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas: final results of a single institutional program

SUMMARY: ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to achieve locoregional control of locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma, survival, and organ preservation using split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and cisplatin concomitantly. This study was a phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy with split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy, 1.6 Gy per fraction given twice per day to a total dose of 64 to 67.2 Gy for a total of 6 weeks with a 2-week gap, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2, days 1 to 5, in continuous perfusion, concomitantly. Seventy-three patients were treated (stage IV, 64%). At a median follow-up of 55 months for living patients, median survival was 44 months, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 42% and 39%, respectively. Toxicities included mucositis (grade III, 40%; grade IV, 28%), epithelitis (grade III, 28%). Of the 73 patients, 32 (44%) have continued with their larynx free of disease. Split hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy and concomitant cisplatin has been demonstrated to be an active treatment for locally advanced laryngeal carcinomas, but more active combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, without increase of toxicity, are necessary to increase the rate of locoregional control, organ preservation, and survival.     

Incidence, natural history, and patterns of locoregional recurrence in gastric cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the incidence and patterns (in-field, marginal, or out-of-field) of locoregional gastric cancer recurrence in patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and to determine the outcome in these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1994 and 2004, 149 patients with gastric carcinoma were treated according to institutional protocols with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Ultimately, 105 patients had an R0 resection. Of these 105 patients, 65 received preoperative chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and 40 received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Most (96%) of these patients received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy during radiotherapy, and the median radiation dose was 45 Gy. We retrospectively identified and classified the patterns of locoregional recurrence. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial incidence of locoregional recurrence was 13%, with locoregional disease recurring as any part of the failure pattern in 14 patients. Most (64%) of the evaluable locoregional recurrences were in-field. Of the 4 patients with a marginal recurrence, 2 had had inadequate coverage of the regional nodal volumes on their oblique fields. The pathologic complete response rate was 23%. A pathologic complete response was the only statistically significant predictor of locoregional control. CONCLUSION: Patients with gastric cancer who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy had low rates of locoregional recurrence. This strategy merits prospective multi-institutional and randomized evaluation.     

Treatment of Stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy and accelerated fractionation: impact of chemotherapy schemes

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2003, 75 Stage IV(A-B) NPC patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) (n = 41) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) (n = 34), followed by accelerated radiotherapy in concurrence with 2 cycles of cisplatin. In 18 (24%) patients, cisplatin was completely replaced by carboplatin in both concurrent cycles, mainly because of borderline renal functions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.6 years. The 3-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the whole group were 80%, 68%, and 80% respectively. No significant difference was found between patients treated with either induction regimens. However, patients with only carboplatin in the 2 concurrent cycles had significantly inferior 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (56% vs. 86%, p = 0.014), progression-free survival (39% vs. 72%, p = 0.001), and overall survival (61% vs. 87%, p = 0.046) when compared with the rest of the group. In multivariate analysis, the complete replacement of cisplatin by carboplatin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy was still an independent adverse factor in locoregional failure-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.662; 95% CI, 1.145-11.765; p = 0.029) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.390; 95% CI, 1.443-7.937; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The more convenient PG regimen is as effective as the PF regimen as induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced NPC. Replacing cisplatin with carboplatin in the concurrent phase carries a poor prognosis.     

Mature results from a randomized Phase II trial of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy with or without tirapazamine in patients with resectable Stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article was to report the results from a randomized trial that evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of adding tirapazamine (TPZ) to chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). METHODS: Sixty-two patients with lymph node-positive, resectable, TNM Stage IV HNSCC were randomized to receive either 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy (TPZ, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) followed by simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (TPZ, cisplatin, and 5-FU) or to receive the same regimen without TPZ. Patients who did not achieve a complete response at 50 Grays underwent surgical treatment. Stratification factors for randomization included tumor site, TNM stage, and median tumor oxygen tension. The primary endpoint was complete lymph node response. RESULTS: The addition of TPZ resulted in increased hematologic toxicity. There was 1 treatment-related death from induction chemotherapy. The complete clinical and pathologic response rate in the lymph nodes was 90% and 74% for the standard treatment arm and the TPZ arm, respectively (P = .08) and 89% and 90% at the primary site in the respective treatment arms (P = .71). The 5-year overall survival rate was 59%, the cause-specific survival rate was 68%, the rate of freedom from recurrence was 69%, and the locoregional control rate was 77% for the entire group. There was no difference with regard to any of the outcome parameters between the 2 treatment arms. The significant long-term toxicity rate also was found to be similar between the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TPZ increased hematologic toxicity but did not improve outcomes in patients with resectable, Stage IV HNSCC using the protocol administered this small randomized study. The combination of induction and simultaneous chemoradiotherapy resulted in excellent survival in these patients.     

Dose-response relationship in locoregional control for patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between radiation dose and locoregional control (LRC) for patients with Stage II-III unresectable esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The medical records of 69 consecutive patients with clinical Stage II or III esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1990 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 69 patients, 43 had received < or =51 Gy (lower dose group) and 26 >51 Gy (higher dose group). The median dose in the lower and higher dose groups was 30 Gy (range, 30-51 Gy) and 59.4 Gy (range, 54-64.8 Gy), respectively. Two fractionation schedules were used: rapid fractionation, delivering 30 Gy at 3 Gy/fraction within 2 weeks, and standard fractionation, delivering > or =45 Gy at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction daily. Total doses of <50 Gy were usually given with rapid fractionation. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were administrated to 93% of the patients. RESULTS: The patient characteristic that differed between the two groups was that patients in the lower dose group were more likely to have had weight loss >5% (46.2% vs. 23.3%). The lower dose group had more N1 tumors, but the tumor classification and stage grouping were similar in the two groups. The median follow-up time for all patients was 22 months (range, 2-56 months). Patients in the higher dose group had a statistically significant better 3-year local control rate (36% vs. 19%, p = 0.011), disease-free survival rate (25% vs. 10%, p = 0.004), and overall survival rate (13% vs. 3%, p = 0.054). A trend toward a better distant-metastasis-free survival rate was noted in the higher dose group (72% vs. 59%, p = 0.12). The complete clinical response rate was significantly greater in the higher dose group (46% vs. 23%, p = 0.048). In both groups, the most common type of first failure was persistence of the primary tumor. Significantly fewer patients in the higher dose group had tumor persistence after treatment (p = 0.02). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the pattern of locoregional or distant failure. The long-term side effects of chemoradiotherapy were similar in the two groups, although it was difficult to assess the side effects accurately in a retrospective fashion. On multivariate analysis, Stage II (vs. III) disease and radiation dose >51 Gy were independent predictors of improved LRC, and locoregional failure was an independent predictor of worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our data suggested a positive correlation between radiation dose and LRC in the population studied. A higher radiation dose was associated with increased LRC and survival in the dose range studied. The data also suggested that better LRC was associated with a lower rate of distant metastasis. A threshold of tumor response to radiation dose might be present, as suggested by the flattened slope in the high-dose area on the dose-response curve. A carefully designed dose-escalation study is required to confirm this assumption.