血清PSA及超声引导穿刺活检对前列腺癌病理分期预测价值研究

目的 研究血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及超声引导穿刺活检对前列腺癌病理分期的预测价值.方法 选取200例经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检确诊为前列腺癌的患者的临床资料进行研究.分析患者的血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分3个参数与前列腺癌病理分期的相关性;同时对比性分析以上3个参数在不同病理分期前列腺癌患者中的差异情况.结果 血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分均与前列腺癌患者的病理分期呈正相关(P﹤0.001);D期前列腺癌患者的血清PSA水平明显高于A期、B期、C期前列腺癌患者(P﹤0.05),而A期、B期、C期前列腺癌患者的血清PSA水平两两之间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);C期与D期前列腺癌患者的穿刺活检阳性百分数比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05),而其他各分期间穿刺活检阳性百分数两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);A期与C期、B期与C期、A期与D期、B期与D期前列腺癌患者的Gleason评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),而A期与B期、C期与D期前列腺癌患者的Gleason评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05).结论 血清PSA、穿刺活检阳性百分数及Gleason评分均可单独用于前列腺期病理分期的预测,同时该3个参数在区分前列腺癌病理分期方面也发挥一定辅助作用.     

Ten-year survival after radical prostatectomy: specimen Gleason score is the predictor in organ-confined prostate cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

Serum insulin level,disease stage,prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in prostate cancer

In the present study, we assessed the relationship of serum insulin levels and three surrogate markers of recurrence, T stage, PSA, and Gleason score, in men with localized prostate cancer. Participants in our study were found through urology and radiation oncology clinics, and all eligible patients were asked to take part. All patients were asymptomatic and had been initially diagnosed on the basis of rising PSA or abnormal physical examination. Histological confirmation of diagnosis was obtained for all subjects. Serum insulin levels were determined by chemoluminescent assay with a standard, commercially available instrument. Patients were divided into three previously defined risk groups: Low risk: PSA < or =10, stage < or =T2a, or Gleason grade < or =6. Medium risk: 10 7, tumour in seminal vesicle biopsy, PSA >15 or stage T2c or T3. One hundred and sixty-three men with prostate cancer were studied. There was a significant increase in serum insulin with risk group (P=0.003, one way anova). Tukey's multiple range test showed that the insulin levels of high risk patients were significantly higher than the insulin levels of medium and low risk patients (P=0.05) but the insulin levels of medium and low risk patients were not significantly different from one another. Multivariate linear regression, with insulin as the dependent variable, Gleason score, PSA, and T stage (T1, T2, T3) as the independent variables, was significant overall (P<0.001, r(2)=0.120). Increased T stage was independently correlated with increased serum insulin levels (P<0.001). Gleason score was negatively, insignificantly correlated with serum insulin level (P=0.059). The positive correlation of PSA and insulin level was not significant (P=0.097). To assure normal distribution of insulin and PSA values, the regression was repeated with log (insulin) as the dependent variable, log (PSA), T stage (T1, T2, T3), and Gleason score as independent variables. The regression was significant overall (P=0.002, r(2) =0.095). Increased T stage was independently correlated with increased log (insulin level) (P=0.026). Gleason score was negatively, insignificantly correlated with log (insulin) level (P=0.728). The positive correlation of log (PSA) and log (insulin) levels was significant (P=0.010). The relationship between increased insulin level and advanced tumour stage in prostate cancer we describe here is biologically quite plausible, since insulin is a growth factor. Further studies may document whether serum insulin levels might be a useful biomarker of prostate cancer stage.     

Preoperative serum caveolin-1 as a prognostic marker for recurrence in a radical prostatectomy cohort.

PURPOSE: Up-regulation of caveolin-1 (cav-1) is associated with virulent prostate cancer, and serum cav-1 levels are elevated in prostate cancer patients but not in benign prostatic hyperplasia. In this study, we evaluated the potential of high preoperative serum cav-1 levels to predict biochemical progression of prostate cancer. The value of the combined preoperative markers, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and serum cav-1 for predicting biochemical recurrence was also investigated. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum samples taken from 419 prostate cancer patients before radical prostatectomy were selected from our Specialized Programs of Research Excellence prostate cancer serum and tissue bank. Serum samples were obtained 0 to 180 days before surgery and all patients had complete data on age, sex, race, stage at enrollment, and follow-up for biochemical recurrence. Serum cav-1 levels were measured according to our previously reported ELISA protocol. RESULTS: Cav-1 levels were measured in the sera of 419 prostate cancer patients; the mean serum level was 4.52 ng/mL (median 1.01 ng/mL). Patients with high serum cav-1 levels had a 2.7-fold (P = 0.0493) greater risk of developing biochemical recurrence compared with those with low serum cav-1 levels. Importantly, patients with serum PSA >/= 10 ng/mL and elevated levels of serum cav-1 had 2.44 times higher risk (P = 0.0256) of developing biochemical recurrence compared with patients with low levels of cav-1. In addition, high serum cav-1 levels combined with increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted much shorter recurrence-free survival in the group of patients with PSA >/= 10 ng/mL (P = 0.0353). Cav-1 was also able to distinguish between high- and low- risk patients with biopsy Gleason score of seven, after adjusting, for patients PSA levels (P = 0.0429). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, elevated preoperative levels of serum cav-1 predict decreased time to cancer recurrence. In the subset of patients with serum PSA of >/=10 ng/mL, the combination of serum cav-1 and biopsy Gleason score has the capacity to predict time to biochemical recurrence.     

Ten-Year Survival After Radical Prostatectomy: Specimen Gleason Score Is the Predictor in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer

Pathologic stage is a major prognostic factor in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, disease recurrence occurs even in patients with organ-confined disease. With the advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, the percentage of patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors has increased significantly. We studied clinical/pathologic factors that will predict disease recurrence in patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors. Patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had not received prior therapeutic intervention but who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive treatment between 1990 and 1999, were included in this study. Clinical/pathologic parameters including age, race, clinical stage, preoperative PSA, and biopsy and specimen Gleason scores (grouped as 2-6, 7, and 8-10) were correlated with disease-free survival in patients with organ-confined disease. Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for the cohort was also assessed. A total of 1045 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Overall, the 10-year estimates of PSA progression-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survival were 75%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. Cancer was confined to the prostate in 532 of 1045 patients (51%), of whom 96% (511 of 532) remain PSA progression-free, compared to 65% (335 of 513) with extraprostatic disease (P = 0.0001). Interestingly, in patients with organ-confined disease, the specimen Gleason score was the only prognostic factor for disease recurrence after multivariable analysis. Radical prostatectomy provided excellent cancer control. For patients with pathologically organ-confined tumors, the specimen Gleason score is the only factor predictive of disease-free survival. Of note, Gleason scores of 8-10 are uncommon in these patients.     

以尿潴留为首发表现的前列腺癌临床分析（附43例）

目的:回顾分析以尿潴留为首发表现的前列腺癌患者的临床特点。方法:收集我院2001年7月至2014年7月以尿潴留为首发症状的前列腺癌患者43例,均经前列腺穿刺活检确诊。3例患者接受腹腔镜下腹膜外前列腺癌根治术,其余40例患者均接受经尿道前列腺电切术（transurethral resection of prostate,TURP）联合内分泌治疗［（最大限度雄激素阻断（maximal androgen blockade,MAB）］。统计其年龄分布、前列腺特异性抗原（prostate specific antigen,PSA）、直肠指检(digital rectal examination,DRE)阳性率、经直肠前列腺穿刺阳性针数、Gleason评分、骨转移、肿瘤分期、治疗后排尿恢复情况、IPSS评分及1年、3年、5年生存率。结果:43例患者的年龄中位数为69岁;直肠指检阳性率达81.4%（35/43）;PSA＞20 ng/ml者占62.8%（27/43）;经直肠前列腺穿刺（12+X针穿刺法）超过7针以上阳性的占76.7%（33/43）;Gleason评分≥7分占95.3%（41/43）;骨转移患者占76.7%（33/43）;临床分期T3b-T4期占88.4%（38/43）;治疗后6个月全部患者恢复了自主排尿,1年生存率为97.7%,3年生存率为79.1%,5年生存率为55.8%。结论:老年男性发生尿潴留应当考虑有前列腺癌的可能性,该类前列腺癌患者病程往往多为晚期且为高危患者,肿瘤压迫侵犯尿道及膀胱颈是排尿困难的主要原因,经尿道前列腺电切术联合内分泌治疗,可有效解除下尿路梗阻,控制肿瘤进展,提高患者生活质量。     

Impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on 8-year biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and January 2001, 668 consecutive patients underwent brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I for clinical Stage T1b-T3aNxM0 (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. No patient underwent seminal vesicle biopsy or pathologic lymph node staging. The median follow-up was 58.6 months. Biochemical progression-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for biochemical progression-free survival included supplemental EBRT, ADT, patient age, clinical stage, Gleason score, preimplant prostate specific antigen (PSA), risk group, percentage of positive biopsies, isotope used, prostate volume, planning volume, percentage of target volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of prescribed dose, minimal percentage of dose covering 90% of target volume, tobacco status, hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: For the entire group, the actuarial 8-year biochemical progression-free survival rate was 98.2%, 98.4%, and 88.2% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, with a median PSA level of <0.1 ng/mL for all risk groups and ADT and EBRT subgroups. At last follow-up, only 5 patients (0.8%) had died of metastatic prostate cancer. In multivariate analysis, Gleason score, percentage of positive biopsies, and ADT predicted for biochemical outcome in high-risk patients. In low- and intermediate-risk patients, none of the evaluated variables predicted for biochemical outcome. For the entire population, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason score, ADT, and clinical stage predicted for 8-year biochemical progression-free survival, with the percentage of positive biopsies approaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Prostate brachytherapy results in a high probability of 8-year biochemical progression-free survival for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. Although the role of supplemental EBRT could not be adequately evaluated in high-risk patients, it did not improve biochemical outcome in low- and intermediate-risk patients. However, ADT resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for high-risk patients.     

Androgen deprivation therapy does not impact cause-specific or overall survival in high-risk prostate cancer managed with brachytherapy and supplemental external beam

PURPOSE: To determine cause-specific survival (CSS), biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) in high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and July 2002, 204 patients with high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score > or = 8 or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/mL or clinical stage > or = T2c) underwent brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 7.0 years. The bPFS was defined by a PSA < or = 0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for the impact on survival. RESULTS: The 10-year CSS, bPFS, and OS were 88.9%, 86.6%, and 68.6%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in bPFS was discerned between hormone naive, ADT < or = 6 months, and ADT >6 month cohorts (79.7% vs. 95.% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.032). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) did not impact CSS or OS. For bPFS patients, the median posttreatment PSA was <0.04 ng/mL. A Cox linear regression analysis demonstrated that Gleason score was the best predictor of CSS, whereas percent positive biopsies and duration of ADT best predicted for bPFS. The OS was best predicted by Gleason score and diabetes. Thirty-eight patients have died, with 26 of the deaths from cardiovascular/pulmonary disease or second malignancy. Eleven patients have died of metastatic prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The ADT improved 10-year bPFS without statistical impact on CSS or OS. Death as a result of cardiovascular/pulmonary disease and second malignancies were more than twice as common as prostate cancer deaths. Strategies to improve cardiovascular health should positively impact OS.     

A prospective study of the serum prostate specific antigen concentrations and Gleason histologic scores of black and white men with prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The stage specific survival rates of black American men with prostate carcinoma are less favorable than those of white American men. The authors conducted a prospective study of the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations and Gleason histologic scores of black and white men with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma to determine whether there were racial differences in these prognostic variables. METHODS: At a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997, clinical stage, Gleason histologic score, serum PSA concentration, prostate volume, and PSA density were determined for 796 consecutive men (465 black and 331 white) who had biopsy-detected prostate carcinoma. RESULTS: The percentages, respectively, of black and white men with local, regional, and metastatic carcinoma were 58 and 72; 22 and 17; and 20 and 11 (P < 0.0001). Of 271 black and 329 white men with local stage cancer, 20% and 12%, respectively, had Gleason 8-10 tumors (P = 0.02), and the age-adjusted risk of Gleason 8-10 cancer was 1.39 times greater for black men (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.93). Gleason 8-10 cancer was found in 12 of 68 black (18%) and 5 of 87 white (6%) men with local cancer who were age 65 years or younger (P = 0.02). Among black and white men with local stage cancer, the mean PSA was 12.9 (95% CI = 11.5-14.4) and 8.5 (95% CI = 7.6-9.4) ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.0001), and among black and white men with regional stage cancer the mean PSA was 53.3 (95% CI = 42.7-63.9) and 35.0 (95% CI = 27.3-42.6) ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.02). The mean PSA of black and white men with local cancer who were age 65 years or younger was 11.6 (95% CI = 8.8-14.4) and 6.9 (95% CI = 5.9-8.0) ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in the risk of Gleason score 8-10 cancer for black and white men with local stage disease and in the serum PSA concentrations of black and white men with local and regional stage disease help to explain racial differences in cancer survival. Racial differences in the risk of Gleason 8-10 cancer and in the serum PSA concentrations of men age 65 years or younger have implications regarding the potential benefits of screening for prostate carcinoma in the African American community.     

Prognostic significance of race on biochemical control in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with permanent brachytherapy: multivariate and matched-pair analyses

PURPOSE: To compare PSA relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) between African-American (AA) and white American (WA) males treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One thousand eighty-one consecutive patients, including 246 African-Americans, underwent PPB with 103Pd or 125I, alone or with external beam radiation therapy between September 1992 and September 1999. Computer-generated matching was performed to create two identical cohorts of WA and AA males, based on the use of neoadjuvant androgen ablation (NAAD), pretreatment PSA, and Gleason score. Presenting characteristics were used to define risk groups, as follows: Low risk had PSA 10 or Gleason score >or=7, and high risk had PSA >10 and Gleason score >or=7. PSA-RFS was calculated using the Kattan modification of the ASTRO definition, and the log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier PSA-RFS curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of PSA-RFS. RESULTS: Overall, univariate analysis revealed that AA males at presentation had lower disease stage (p = 0.01), had lower Gleason scores (p = 0.017), were younger (p = 0.001), and were more likely to receive NAAD (p = 0.001) than their WA counterparts. There were no differences in pretreatment PSA, isotope selection, use of external beam radiation therapy, median follow-up, or risk group classification between AA and WA males. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were significant predictors of PSA-RFS in multivariate analysis, and race was not significant. There was no significant difference between the 5-year PSA-RFS for AA males (84.0%) and the matched cohort of WA males (81.2%) (p = 0.384). Race was not a predictor of 5-year PSA-RFS among patients treated with or without NAAD and within low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. CONCLUSION: Race is not an independent predictor of 5-year PSA-RFS in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with PPB. This result is consistent with other studies that also show that race does not contribute to differences in outcome after definitive therapies for localized prostate cancer.     

Primary Gleason pattern does not impact survival after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for Gleason score 7 prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The impact of primary Gleason pattern was determined on cause-specific (CSS), biochemical progression-free (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) after brachytherapy for Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. METHODS: From April 1995 to October 2003, 530 patients underwent brachytherapy for Gleason score 3+4 (n = 300) or Gleason 4+3 (n = 230) prostate cancer. All patients underwent brachytherapy more than 3 years before analysis. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. Of the 530 patients, 412 (77.7%) received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (XRT) and 177 (33.4%) received androgen deprivation therapy. bPFS was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 相似文献   

Tumour growth fraction measured by immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 is an independent prognostic factor in preoperative prostate biopsies with small‐volume or low‐grade prostate cancer

Accurate prognostic parameters in prostate biopsies are needed to better counsel individual patients with prostate cancer. We evaluated the prognostic impact of morphologic and immunohistochemical parameters in preoperative prostate cancer biopsies. A consecutive series of prostate biopsies of 279 men (72% with clinical stage T1c and 23% with T2) who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy was prospectively analysed for Gleason score, number and percentage of positive cores (NPC, PPC), total percentage of biopsy tissue with tumour (TPT), maximum tumour percentage per core (MTP), and expression of Ki67, Bcl‐2 and p53. All biopsy features were significantly associated with at least one feature of the radical prostatectomy specimen. pT stage was independently predicted by PSA, seminal vesicle invasion by Ki67 LI, positive margins by PSA and MTP, large tumour diameter by PSA and PPC, and Gleason score by biopsy Gleason score, MTP, and Ki67 LI, respectively. Biopsy Gleason score, NPC (1 vs. >1), TPT (<7 vs. ≥7%), and Ki67 LI (<10 vs. ≥10%) were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (p < 0.01, each). KI67 LI was the only independent prognostic factor in case of a low TPT (<7%) or low Gleason score (<7), the hazard ratio being 6.76 and 6.44, respectively. In summary, preoperative Gleason score, NPC, TPT and Ki67 LI significantly predict the risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy, and Ki67 is an independent prognosticator in biopsies with low‐volume or low‐grade prostate cancer. Analysis of Ki67 LI in these biopsies may help to better identify patients with clinically insignificant prostate cancer. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

External beam radiotherapy for clinically node-negative, localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer: impact of pretreatment PSA value on radiotherapeutic outcomes

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of clinically node-negative, localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and to investigate the potential prognostic factors that influenced the therapeutic outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-three patients who had developed localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with EBRT between 1994 and 2001. According to the 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage, 4 patients had T2 and 49 had T3 at the start of RT, and 14 patients had a Gleason score <7, 14 had a Gleason score of 7, and 23 had a Gleason score of 8-10. All patients were treated with EBRT using the unblocked oblique four-field technique, with a total dose of 69 Gy. The fraction dose was 3 Gy three times weekly. The median follow-up after RT was 35 months (range, 8-96 months) and after androgen ablation was 73 months (range, 42-156 months). RESULTS: Of 53 patients, 15 patients subsequently developed clinical relapse, including locoregional and/or distant metastases. The site of first relapse was bone metastasis in 10, lymph nodes in 3, and local failure in 2 patients; 3 patients died of prostate cancer during the analysis period. The 3-year and 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 94% and 87%, respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year clinical relapse-free survival rate was 78% and 56%, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed that a short prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time and high PSA value at the start of RT and a high Gleason score were statistically significant factors for the risk of clinical relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PSA value (PSA or=15 ng/mL) at the start of RT was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: EBRT could be a treatment of choice for clinically node-negative, localized, hormone-refractory prostate cancer.     

The Relationship of PSA, PSAD and Clinicopathological Stage in Patients with Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between the clinicopatho- logical stage and serum prostate specific antigen(PSA)concentration and PSAdensity(PSAD)in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS The clinicopathological stage was determined on the basis of a pathological examination and clinical data in 65 prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy.PSA and PSAD were measured before the operation.The Spearman rank correlation was applied to evaluate the relationship between the clinicopathological stage,serum PSAconcentration and PSAD. RESULTS Patients with higher PSA and PSAD were significantly more likely to have higher clinical stages,a higher Gleason score,positive surgical margins,capsular penetration,and seminal vesicle invasion(each P<0.05). But there was no significant association between PSA and lymph node metastasis(P=0.053).The levels of serum PSA concentration and PSAD were significantly correlated with the clinical stage(P<0.05)in the prostate cancer patients. CONCLUSION The level of both PSA and PSAD were significantly correlated with the clinical stage(P<0.05)in the prostate cancer patients.But PSAD may be a more powerful predictor of clinical stage and prognosis than PSA.     

Nationwide treatment patterns and survival of older patients with prostate cancer

Objectives

To examine the clinical features, applied treatments, and survival of older patients with prostate cancer compared with younger patients.

Is tumor vascularity in prostate core biopsies a predictor of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy?

The purposes of this study were to evaluate if tumour vascularity by Chalkley counting (TVC) in prostate core biopsies can be a predictor of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer and to estimate the concordance between the TVC in core biopsies and the subsequently examined prostatectomy specimen. All patients, with Gleason score ≤7 in core biopsy, clinical stage T1 or T2 who had a radical prostatectomy during 1990 - 1997 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, were selected as a primary group. Patients with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups, one with PSA recurrence and one group without PSA recurrence. 25 patients had PSA recurrence during the follow up period and 25 patients from non-recurrence group were randomly selected. TVC was assessed from the prostate tissue by immunostaining against CD34. TVC was statistically significant predictor of PSA relapse. The PSA-free survival rate was only 17% in patients within the highest TVC quartile compared to 67% in patients within the lowest TVC quartile.     

血清缓激肽与前列腺癌的相关性研究

目的 探讨血清缓激肽在前列腺癌的诊断及鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值.方法 收集68例前列腺癌患者和32例前列腺增生患者,以同期体检的健康男性32例为对照组,收集其血清,酶联免疫吸附试验(enzymelinked immuno sorbent assay,ELISA)法检测血清中的缓激肽水平,比较各组血清缓激肽水平的差异以及前列腺癌患者在不同年龄、临床分期、病理分期(Gleason评分)、前列腺特异抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA)水平、肿瘤体积以及骨转移、淋巴结转移、局部侵犯与否状态下血清缓激肽水平的差异.比较血清缓激肽与PSA联合诊断前列腺癌和PSA独立诊断前列腺癌的敏感度差异.结果 前列腺癌组血清缓激肽水平[(16.44 ±0.91) μg/L]低于对照组[(19.72±1.10) μg/L]和前列腺增生组[(20.93±1.80) μg/L],差异均具有统计学意义(均P＜0.05).在肿瘤体积较大的前列腺癌患者血清缓激肽水平较低(P＜0.05),而血清缓激肽水平在年龄、肿瘤临床分期、病理分期(Gleason评分)、PSA水平及骨转移、淋巴结转移、局部侵犯与否方面比较差异均无统计学意义(均P＞0.05).血清缓激肽与PSA联合诊断前列腺癌较单独诊断敏感度提高(P＜0.05).结论 前列腺癌患者血清缓激肽表达水平较低,且与肿瘤体积相关.血清缓激肽与PSA联合诊断前列腺癌敏感度较单独诊断高.     

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of various patient, disease, and treatment characteristics on outcome in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for clinically localized, high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma (initial prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20, Gleason score 8-10 or Stage > or = T3). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 407 patients treated between 1991 and 2001 with NAHT and EBRT for high-risk prostate cancer. The effect of tumor (PSA level, Gleason score, and T stage) and treatment (NAHT duration, total-hormone duration, preradiation PSA) characteristics on rates of biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were examined. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 78 months (range: 5-140 months). Actuarial bDFS at 5 years was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 57%) for the entire group. On multivariate analysis, initial PSA level (p = 0.004), Gleason score (p = 0.005), and preradiation PSA level (p < 0.001) were predictive of bDFS, whereas age, T stage, duration of NAHT, and duration of total hormone therapy were not predictive of outcomes. Gleason score and preradiation PSA level were also predictive of prostate cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSION: Improved bDFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer was associated with lower initial PSA level, lower Gleason score, and lower preradiation PSA level. The duration of NAHT did not have an impact on outcomes, but the preradiation PSA was an important predictor of bDFS in high-risk patients.     

河北医科大学第四医院前列腺癌患者的基线特征与生存分析

背景与目的：近年来，前列腺癌发病率逐年增高，但前列腺癌筛查工作仍不全面，国内前列腺癌数据库也相对匮乏。分析河北医科大学第四医院前列腺癌患者的基线特征、治疗以及生存情况等数据，为河北及周边地区前列腺癌的诊治提供参考。方法：回顾性分析2008年1月—2018年12月在河北医科大学第四医院泌尿外科就诊的857例前列腺癌患者信息，分析初次就诊时非转移性（M ₀ ）和转移性（M ₁ ）前列腺癌患者的基线特征、治疗方案和生存情况。对随访数据采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线，并用log-rank检验比较两组之间生存率差异。结果：纳入基线统计的患者共计857例，中位年龄71岁，797例存在前列腺特异性抗原（prostate-specific antigen，PSA）记录，689例存在Gleason评分记录。412例M ₀ 患者和445例M ₁ 患者中，PSA≥100 ng/mL的患者分别占11.1%（44/397）和57.3%（229/400），Gleason评分≥8分的患者分别占46.9%（166/354）和63.9%（214/335）。纳入随访分析的患者共计606例，患者生存395例，死亡211例，其中182例死于肿瘤进展。M ₀ 和M ₁ 患者5年生存率分别为63.2%（76/120）和41.3%（102/247），M ₀ 和M ₁ 患者的中位生存期分别为85和 47个月（P＜0.01）。此外，在所有采用传统内分泌治疗［雄激素剥夺治疗（androgen deprivation therapy，ADT）或联合雄激素阻断治疗（combined androgen blockade，CAB）］的M ₁ 患者和高危转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌（metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer，mHSPC）患者中，中位PSA进展时间（time to PSA progression，TTPP）分别为18和17个月。内分泌治疗初诊M ₀ 患者的中位TTPP为25个月。12例影像学检测未发现远处转移的去势抵抗性前列腺癌（non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer，NM-CRPC）患者，中位无转移生存期（metastasis-free survival，MFS）仅为16个月。结论：前列腺癌患者的年龄、PSA及Gleason评分偏高，多数患者在治疗时有转移，5年生存率偏低，因此应重视和加强前列腺癌的筛查工作。在接受内分泌治疗的M ₁ 患者进展为转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌（metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer，mCRPC）的时间较短，此外，接受内分泌治疗的M ₀ 患者进展至NM-CRPC后，进展为mCRPC或死亡的时间也非常短，未来对于M ₁ 和NM-CRPC患者应采取更为积极的治疗，以延缓病情进展到mCRPC阶段。