Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a patient with Lynch syndrome

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a mucin-producing epithelial neoplasm that carries a risk of progression to invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes such as MSH2 that lead to microsatellite instability and increased risk of tumor formation. Although families with Lynch syndrome have an increased risk of pancreatic cancer, a clear connection between Lynch syndrome and IPMN has not been drawn. We present a report of a 58 year-old Caucasian woman with multiple cancers and a germline mutation of MSH2 consistent with Lynch syndrome. A screening abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a dilated main pancreatic duct and cystic ductular structure in the uncinate process that were consistent with IPMN of the main pancreatic duct on excision. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction of the patient’s pancreas specimen did not reveal microsatellite instability or mismatch repair gene loss of expression or function. Our findings may be explained by the fact that loss of mismatch repair function and microsatellite instability is a late event in neoplastic transformation. Given the relative rarity of main duct IPMN, its appearance in the setting of somatic MSH2 mutation suggests that IPMN may fit into the constellation of Lynch syndrome related malignancies.     

The genetics of HNPCC: application to diagnosis and screening

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC; Lynch Syndrome) is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancers. Predisposed individuals have increased lifetime risk of developing colorectal, endometrial and other cancers. The syndrome is primarily due to heterozygous germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes; mainly MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. The resulting mismatch repair deficiency leads to microsatellite instability which is the hallmark of tumors arising within this syndrome, as well as a variable proportion of sporadic tumors. Diagnostic guidelines and criteria for molecular testing of suspected families have been proposed and are continuously updated. However, not all families fulfilling these criteria show mutations in mismatch repair genes and/or microsatellite instability implicating other, as yet unknown, carcinogenic mechanisms and predisposition genes. This subset of tumors is the focus of current clinical and molecular research. This review addresses recent advances in the field of HNPCC research and their applications in the management of affected individuals and families.     

Identification and Classification of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch Syndrome): Adapting Old Concepts to Recent Advancements. Report from the Italian Association for the Study of Hereditary Colorectal Tumors Consensus Group

Knowledge about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome clearly evolved during the last 10 to 15 years much more rapidly than in the past century. Consequently, long-established concepts and attitudes that held for many years should now be changed or updated. With regard to classification, we suggest maintaining the eponym "Lynch syndrome" for families that have a well-documented deficiency of the DNA mismatch repair system, whereas "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer" should be reserved for those families that meet the Amsterdam criteria but without evidence of mismatch repair impairment. Any family (or individual) meeting one or more of the Bethesda criteria can be considered as suspected HNPCC. For the identification of hereditary colorectal cancer molecular screening or the pedigree analysis show advantages and disadvantages; the ideal would be to combine the two approaches. Diffusion of the microsatellite instability test and of immunohistochemistry in the pathology laboratories might render in the immediate future molecular screening more realistic. Strict endoscopic surveillance of family members at risk (with first colonoscopy at age 20-25 years and then every 2-3 years) is needed only in families with documented alterations of the DNA mismatch repair. To a certain extent, our conclusions were similar to the recently proposed "European guidelines for the clinical management of HNPCC," although we prefer the term "clinical hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer," instead of familial colorectal cancer, for families meeting the Amsterdam criteria but not having evidence of mismatch repair impairment.     

The hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: genetics and clinical implications

Basic studies of DNA replication and repair have provided surprising and pivotal insights into a novel pathway of tumorigenesis. Defects in the DNA mismatch repair process dramatically increase the risk for specific types of cancer because of instability in microsatellite DNA sequences. A germline mutation in either the hMSH2 or hMLH1 mismatch repair gene results in the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), or Lynch, syndrome. The lifetime risk for colon cancer is 80% in affected persons, and an aggressive cancer surveillance program is essential not only for these individuals but also for at-risk family members. The diagnosis of HNPCC can be made by fulfillment of the Amsterdam clinical criteria or through genetic testing for germline mutations in hMSH2 or hMLH1. Genetic testing is particularly useful in families with atypical clinical features and also for cancer risk assessment within an established HNPCC kindred. Microsatellite instability (MSI) of DNA is a hallmark feature of HNPCC-associated tumors, and as many as 15% of cases of sporadic colorectal cancer also display MSI. The biological behavior of colorectal tumors with MSI is distinctive; the most intriguing feature is their favorable natural history. The study of HNPCC has provided an example of the powerful interplay between molecular genetics and clinical care.     

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch Syndrome): Criteria for Identification and Management

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC), or Lynch syndrome, is an autosomal dominant syndrome accounting for 5 to 10% of the total colorectal cancer population. Patients with this syndrome develop colorectal carcinoma at an early age, but disease onset can happen in all age groups. Usually the carcinomas are synchronous or metachronous, and most of them arise proximal to the splenic flexure. The prognosis is better than for the sporadic form of cancer, and there is increased risk for cancer development in certain extracolonic sites, such as the endometrium, ovary, stomach, small bowel, hepatobiliary tract, ureter, and renal pelvis. Most patients with HNPCC have a mutation in one of two DNA mismatch repair genes, hMSH2 or hMLH1. More than 90% of colorectal carcinoma patients with hMSH2 or hMLH1 demonstrate high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H). If a patient is suspected to belong to an HNPCC family, the first screening test should be immunohistochemistry for the detection of hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins, and if it is indicative, it should be followed by genomic sequencing for the identification of mutations in the mismatch repair genes. Genetic counseling and surveillance for high risk HNPCC family members should begin at age 25. Surveillance includes annual colonoscopy of the entire large bowel, with fecal occult blood testing performed twice a year. Systematic surveillance and individually designed treatment of affected patients may help to detect cancers at an earlier stage and subsequently improve the prognosis of the disease further.     

Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The revised Bethesda guidelines for Lynch syndrome recommend microsatellite instability (MSI) testing all colorectal cancers in patients diagnosed before age 50 years and colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients between ages 50 and 59 years with particular pathology features. Our aim was to identify pathology and other features that independently predict high MSI (MSI-H). METHODS: Archival tissue from 1098 population-based colorectal cancers diagnosed before age 60 years was tested for MSI. Pathology features, site, and age at diagnosis were obtained. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine the predictive value of each feature, as measured by an odds ratio (OR), from which a scoring system (MsPath) was developed to estimate the probability a colorectal cancer is MSI-H. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of tumors (162) were MSI-H. Independent predictors were tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (OR, 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-14.1), proximal subsite (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.3), mucinous histology (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8), poor differentiation (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1), Crohn's-like reaction (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9), and diagnosis before age 50 years (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9). MsPath score >or=1.0 had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 55% for MSI-H. CONCLUSIONS: The probability an individual colorectal cancer is MSI-H is predicted well by the MsPath score. There is little value in testing for DNA mismatch repair loss in tumors, or for germline mismatch repair mutations, for colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients before age 60 years with an MSPath score <1 (approximately 50%). Pathology can identify almost all MSI-H colorectal cancers diagnosed before age 60 years.     

Das Lynch-Syndrom

Purpose

Lynch syndrome as the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and the most common cause of hereditary endometrial cancer is characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance with a penetrance of 85–90%. The molecular genetic underlying mechanism is a mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes.

Methods

In order to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a nuclear family history should be ascertained and matched with the Amsterdam criteria. A different approach for identification is the adherence to Bethesda criteria and subsequent testing for microsatellite instability. In patients with unstable tumors as an indicator for mismatch repair deficiency, genetic counseling and mutation analysis are warranted. For families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria, intensified screening is recommended, even if a pathogenic mutation is not identified.

Results

Individuals from families with a proven pathogenic mutation that are tested negative are at normal population risk for cancers and may be dismissed from intensified surveillance. Prophylactic surgery in high-risk individuals without neoplasia is not generally recommended. At the time of a colon primary, however, extended surgery should be discussed in the light of a high rate of metachronous cancers. The worries of impairing functional results have now been evaluated in the light of quality of life in a large international cohort. Interestingly, extended (prophylactic) surgery does not lead to inferior quality of life with equal perioperative risks.

Conclusions

Therefore, taking the risk reduction into account, extended surgery at the time of the first colon primary should at least be discussed, if not recommended. Also, prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at the time of a colorectal primary should be recommended if family planning has been completed.     

林奇综合征诊疗进展

林奇综合征是一种由错配修复基因突变造成的遗传性结直肠癌综合征,属常染色体显性遗传病,过去又称遗传性非息肉病性大肠癌,约占全部大肠癌的5%~15%,错配修复基因的种系突变和微卫星不稳定是其分子遗传学基础。近年来随着分子生物学的进展,林奇综合征的诊断及治疗越来越受到人们的关注,本文就林奇综合征的诊断与治疗进展做一综述。     

Lynch综合征相关结直肠癌的遗传基因及分子病理筛查策略

Lynch综合征（Lynch syndrom）是结直肠癌中最常见的遗传性肿瘤综合征,约占全部大肠癌的2~3%。该病患者同时增加了罹患肠外及第二肿瘤的风险。现已证明,Lynch综合征是由于编码错配修复基因（mismatch repair,MMR）——MLH1,MSH2,MSH6和PMS2的种系突变、失活导致的一类显性遗传性疾病,近年发现EPCAM的突变与MSH2表达缺失相关。尽管有Amsterdan及Bethesda等临床诊断标准,利用分子遗传学检测在MMR基因中发现致病性胚系突变仍为目前诊断Lynch综合征的金标准。对于发病年龄小于70岁的结直肠癌患者,均应进行Lynch综合征的筛查。首先需进行微卫星不稳定性（microsatellites instability,MSI）检测,检测手段包括PCR扩增微卫星位点及免疫组化（IHC）检测,而后对相应的MMR基因进行胚系突变的检测以明确是否为Lynch综合征以及相应的致病位点。对于MLH1表达缺失患者需进行BRAF基因突变检测和（或）MLH1启动子区域甲基化检测以除外散发性结直肠癌。对于确诊的患者建议进行家系筛查并进行规律的监测和随访。     

Clinical and molecular diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: problems and pitfalls in an extended pedigree

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (or Lynch syndrome) is an autosomal dominant disease in which early onset colorectal carcinomas aggregate in families together with tumours of other organs. The genetic basis of the syndrome has been clarified with the identification of mutations in several DNA mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2 and MSH6). We describe the clinical features and molecular characterization of a large hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer family which has been followed for almost 10 years. The kindred showed a striking aggregation of colorectal tumours in 3 successive generations; most of these neoplasms developed before the age of 50 years and were localized in the proximal colon. Molecular tests (carried out in ten individuals) showed specific alterations at the MLH1 gene, consisting in the insertion of a T nucleotide between bases 2,269 and 2,270; the mutation caused frameshift of the open reading frame and synthesis of a polypeptide longer than normal. The only tumour that could be analysed was positive for microsatellite instability. Physicians should become more confident with hereditary tumours and their implications, which are not limited to a single individual but concern all family members at risk of cancer. This family approach is different, and requires more expertise than the traditional individual approach. Common problems encountered in Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer families include: A) poor collaboration of subjects at risk (a situation which may cause some conflict between the doctor's duty to inform patients about their risk of disease and the rights of patients to choose and decide about their health); B) definition of the most appropriate surveillance programme for a given family (how many investigations to propose to the patients, and how often); C) possible interaction between genes and environmental factors (for instance, a gene carrier--in this family--developed an endometrial carcinoma after standard tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for breast cancer).     

Adenoma prevalence and cancer risk in familial non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polypectomy in the colon has been shown to prevent colorectal cancer in both the general population and in familial colorectal cancer. Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer have an increased risk of the disease. Over a period of 10 years, 304 subjects at risk were included in ongoing surveillance with regular colonoscopies. To compile the medical findings and experience generated during this period, a retrospective cross sectional study was performed. SUBJECTS: Subjects were classified into three family groups: families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); families with hereditary colorectal cancer (HCC, non-Lynch syndrome); and a third group of families with only empirical risk estimates based on a family history of two close relatives (TCR) with colorectal cancer. METHODS: The risk population was studied with regard to age at onset, prevalence, number, cancer risk, size, dysplasia, and distribution of adenomas. A comparison was made within the family groups and with a reference group representing the general population. RESULTS: In total, 195 adenomas and six cancers were detected among 85 individuals. The relative risk of having an adenoma in the whole risk population compared with the general population was 2.6. Subjects from TCR families had most adenomas and HNPCC subjects had the least. A shift from proximal adenomas to distal carcinomas in families with HCC and TCR suggested a higher cancer risk in distal adenomas in these syndromes. HNPCC families showed a younger age at onset and adenomas with a higher degree of dysplasia. In HNPCC, there was a similar localisation of adenomas and carcinomas, suggesting a high risk of cancer in all adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: There was clear overrepresentation of adenomas in all three family types compared with the reference population. In HNPCC, we found earlier onset of adenomas and faster progression to cancer. Families with HCC, and even more so TCR subjects, had a later onset and lower risk of cancer from proximal adenomas. Based on these results, surveillance protocols in Sweden have been revised.     

Mismatch repair gone awry: Management of Lynch syndrome

The hallmark of Lynch syndrome involves germline mutations of genes important in DNA mismatch repair. Affected family kindreds will have multiple associated malignancies, the most common of which is colorectal adenocarcinoma. Recently, evidence has shown that clinical diagnostic criteria provided by the Amsterdam Criteria and the Bethesda Guidelines must be linked with microsatellite instability testing to correctly diagnose Lynch syndrome. We present a case of metachronous colorectal adenocarcinomas in a patient less than 50 years of age, followed by a discussion of Lynch syndrome, with an emphasis on surveillance and prevention of malignancies.     

Lynch syndrome and MYH-associated polyposis: review and testing strategy

Individuals with Lynch syndrome have an increased risk for colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, and other associated cancers such as gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, urothelial cancers, hepatobiliary tract cancer, brain cancer, cancer of the small intestine, pancreatic cancer, and particular skin cancers. Lynch syndrome caused by defects in DNA mismatch repair genes, and diagnostic testing for Lynch syndrome begins with microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis on the tumor specimen followed by germline genetic testing and possibly further studies on the tumor. MYH-associated polyposis syndrome is a recently characterized, autosomal recessive, polyposis syndrome caused by biallelic mutations in the MYH gene. Individuals carrying 2 copies of the mutation have a significantly increased risk of polyposis, colorectal cancer, upper gastrointestinal polyps and additional features commonly seen in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Genetic testing for MYH mutation is complicated by the phenotypic overlap of MYH-associated polyposis with other colorectal cancer syndromes. This study serves to clarify the best testing approach.     

Colorectal Adenomas in Young Patients: Microsatellite Instability is not a Useful Marker to Detect New Cases of Lynch Syndrome

Purpose  Original Bethesda Guidelines proposed microsatellite instability analysis in colorectal adenomas from patients younger than aged 40 years to identify new cases of Lynch syndrome. We intended to evaluate the characteristics of colorectal adenomas from patients younger than aged 40 years to determine their microsatellite instability status and to correlate it with germline mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Methods  Seventy-two adenomas from 58 patients were analyzed. Family history of colorectal cancer, location, and histology of adenomas were evaluated. Microsatellite instability testing was performed with BAT26 only or with the complete Bethesda panel. Germline mutational analysis was performed in MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Results  Thirty-five patients had a family history of colorectal cancer and 16 of them belonged to Amsterdam Criteria positive families. The remaining 23 presented with sporadic adenomas. Microsatellite instability was found in seven adenomas from seven different patients, all belonging to Amsterdam Criteria-positive families. In six of these patients, a pathogenic germline mutation was identified. Conclusions  Adenomas diagnosed before aged 40 years presented microsatellite instability only in patients from families with clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome. According to our results, to detect new cases of Lynch syndrome, family history is more important than microsatellite instability testing in adenomas from young patients. Presented at the United European Gastroenterology Week “UEGW 2006,” Berlin, Germany, October 21 to 25, 2006. Reprints are not available.     

Lynch syndrome and Lynch syndrome mimics: The growing complex landscape of hereditary colon cancer

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) was previously synonymous with Lynch syndrome; however, identification of the role of germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes has made it possible to differentiate Lynch syndrome from other conditions associated with familial colorectal cancer (CRC). Broadly, HNPCC may be dichotomized into conditions that demonstrate defective DNA MMR and microsatellite instability (MSI) vs those conditions that demonstrate intact DNA MMR. Conditions characterized by MMR deficient CRCs include Lynch syndrome (germline MMR mutation), Lynch-like syndrome (biallelic somatic MMR mutations), constitutional MMR deficiency syndrome (biallelic germline MMR mutations), and sporadic MSI CRC (somatic biallelic methylation of MLH1). HNPCC conditions with intact DNA MMR associated with familial CRC include polymerase proofreading associated polyposis and familial colorectal cancer type X. Although next generation sequencing technologies have elucidated the genetic cause for some HNPCC conditions, others remain genetically undefined. Differentiating between Lynch syndrome and the other HNPCC disorders has profound implications for cancer risk assessment and surveillance of affected patients and their at-risk relatives. Clinical suspicion coupled with molecular tumor analysis and testing for germline mutations can help differentiate the clinical mimicry within HNPCC and facilitate diagnosis and management.     

Critical issues in the identification and management of patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Inherited defects of the DNA mismatch repair system are the underlying cause of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome and are responsible for 3-4% of all cases of colorectal cancer. The HNPCC syndrome also carries the risk of development of additional malignancies such as endometrial, stomach, small bowel, ovarian, pancreas, ureter, renal pelvis, biliary tract and brain tumours. Amsterdam I and II criteria have been developed to clinically identify affected families. The revised Bethesda criteria function to select patients whose tumours should be investigated for microsatellite instability, the molecular hallmark of defects of the DNA mismatch repair proteins such as hMLH1 and hMSH2. Microsatellite instability-positive cases should be investigated for germline defects in the respective genes. This facilitates identification of affected family members that have to be included in special surveillance programmes, while unaffected family members are spared the physical discomfort and psychological burden of cancer surveillance. In this article, strategies for effective clinical as well as genetic detection of affected individuals, surveillance and appropriate preventive measures are discussed. Open questions include the role of chemoprevention, preventive surgical procedures, new endoscopic procedures as well as non-invasive 'virtual colonoscopy' and the exact implications of some mutations of the DNA mismatch repair genes. Perhaps most importantly, efforts should be made to more efficiently transfer information about the HNPCC syndrome and the cancer risk associated with it from the specialists to primary health care providers and the general public.     

Hereditary Colon Cancer: Lynch Syndrome

Lynch syndrome is the most common familial colorectal cancer syndrome. It is linked to germline mutations in one of four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. A comprehensive family history is one important way to identify at-risk individuals. The elucidation of the molecular genetics of this syndrome has made it possible to screen for the disorder with molecular tests. Microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemistry followed by germline testing for mutations in MMR genes is now a standard approach for clinically suspected cases. Correctly recognizing Lynch syndrome is essential for the application of appropriate screening and surveillance measures. Close surveillance and risk-reducing operations can decrease cancer-related mortality. In addition, counseling is an important component of the management of any family with Lynch syndrome.     

Cancer characteristics in Swedish families fulfilling criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The present study quantified the prevalence of families that fulfill the Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in the whole Swedish population and investigated the extent to which tumors in the classified families are HNPCC-related. METHODS: The families of the Swedish Family-Cancer Database with at least 4 generations (N = 566,877) were classified according to the Amsterdam and the Bethesda criteria. Survival methods were used to assess the risk of cancer in the classified families, the prognosis of cancer patients, and the risk of subsequent malignancies after colorectal adenomas and after colorectal/endometrial adenocarcinomas. RESULTS: The Bethesda criteria identified 0.9% of all Swedish families and 11.2% of patients with colorectal cancer. Families that fulfilled the Bethesda criteria showed increased risks of cancer in the colorectum, endometrium, small bowel, ovary, stomach, bile ducts, renal pelvis, and ureter; members of Bethesda criteria families were at decreased risks of lung and cervical cancers. The prognosis of cancer in the ureter, renal pelvis, stomach, ovary, and colorectum, but not in the endometrium, was better in Bethesda criteria than in nonclassified families. CONCLUSIONS: Most malignancies in the classified families reflect typical features of HNPCC (association with subsequent malignancies, accelerated adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and better survival). The data presented in this study should help to define surveillance strategies for members of families that fulfill the criteria for HNPCC testing.     

Approach to Lynch Syndrome for the Gastroenterologist

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal-dominant hereditary cancer syndrome. Mutations in mismatch repair genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, are implicated in the pathogenesis of the syndrome through microsatellite instability (MSI) and a rapid adenoma–carcinoma sequence. The primary methodologies for diagnosis include clinical criteria (Amsterdam I/II, Revised Bethesda Guidelines), computational models, and genetic testing (MSI, immunohistochemistry, germline testing). Universal genetic testing of colorectal cancers has gained popularity as a method to identify high-risk individuals and to offer appropriate cancer surveillance, psychological reassurance, and family planning. Management includes short-interval surveillance with colonoscopy in those without colorectal cancer and colectomy for those with cancer. Long-term chemoprevention with aspirin may improve mortality.