Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether progesterone receptor (PgR) status provides additional value to estrogen receptor (ER) status and improves prediction of benefit from endocrine treatment among patients with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical outcomes of patients in two large databases were analyzed as a function of steroid receptor status. The first database (PP), contained 3,739 patients who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy and 1,688 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. The second database (SPORE), contained 10,444 patients who received adjuvant endocrine therapy but no chemotherapy. Biochemical ER and PgR assays were identically performed in two different central laboratories. RESULTS: In univariate and multivariate analyses, the prognostic significance of PgR status among systemically untreated patients is modest. Among endocrine-treated patients, however, multivariate analyses, including lymph-node involvement, tumor size, and age, demonstrate that PgR status is independently associated with disease-free and overall survival. For recurrence, the reduction in relative risk (RR) was 25% for ER-positive/PgR-negative patients and 53% for ER-positive/PgR-positive patients, compared with ER-negative/PgR-negative patients (P <.0001, PP patients). Patients with ER-positive/PgR-negative tumors have a reduction in RR of death of 30% (SPORE patients) and 38% (PP patients), compared with patients with ER-negative/PgR-negative tumors (P <.0001). For ER-positive/PgR-positive tumors, the reduction of the risk of death was greater than 46% in SPORE patients and 58% in PP patients, indicating that ER-positive/PgR-positive patients derive more benefit from endocrine therapy (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: When accurately measured, PgR status is an independent predictive factor for benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. Therefore, PgR status should be taken into account when discussing RR reductions expected from endocrine treatment with individual patients.     

Pattern of hormone receptor status of secondary contralateral breast cancers in patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

In breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen after unilateral treatment, contralateral breast cancer (CBC) is extremely rare. As a result, only limited data are available on the hormone receptor status of CBCs evolving in tamoxifen-treated patients. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate the pattern of hormone receptor status of CBCs in patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen at our institution. Material was collected from 35 patients. We have found that 27 of the 35 patients included into our investigation developed an estrogen receptor (ER)-positive CBC despite adjuvant tamoxifen. Seven ER-positive CBCs occurred after tamoxifen had been discontinued, and 20 patients developed an ER-positive CBC while receiving tamoxifen. Notably, 80% of these CBCs displayed moderate-to-strong levels of ER. In our opinion, the selection of ER-negative CBCs, which has previously been implicated to be the pivotal mechanism of tumor escape of CBCs evolving in tamoxifen-treated patients, is only one mechanism of tumor escape in patients receiving antiestrogen treatment. The emergence of ER-positive CBCs in the majority of tamoxifen-treated patients suggests that alternative escape mechanisms may be equally relevant. These include the emergence of ER-positive CBCs that display tamoxifen-dependent growth properties, the selection of CBCs that are tamoxifen resistant because of ER mutations with altered ER function, and, finally, the selection of ER-positive CBCs that overexpress c-erbB2.     

Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status.

BACKGROUND: Most women with oestrogen receptor (ER) positive primary breast cancer receive adjuvant tamoxifen after surgery. The measurement of tumour biomarkers should allow better selection of patients for such treatment or for therapies such as aromatase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histopathological blocks of primary breast cancer patients who had been randomized to receive 2-years tamoxifen or no adjuvant therapy in two mature randomised clinical trials were retrieved. Immunohistochemical staining for ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was undertaken. The primary endpoint was relapse free survival. RESULTS: 813 patients were included in the study. Benefit from tamoxifen was seen in ER-positive patients [Relative risk (rr) 0.77, ci 0.63-0.93]. ER-negative patients also showed a strong trend to benefit from tamoxifen (rr 0.73, ci 0.52-1.02) which was largely confined to the PgR-positive group. Amongst the ER-positive group, PgR-positive and PgR-negative patients showed similar benefit (rr 0.81; ci 0.65-1.02 and 0.70; ci 0.49-0.99, respectively). Patients positive for HER2 did not benefit significantly (rr 1.14; ci 0.75-1.73) but this group was small. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of PgR status in ER-negative patients defines a group of patients that benefit from tamoxifen but would be excluded from tamoxifen therapy on the basis of ER status alone. The data are consistent with HER2 positive tumours being resistant to tamoxifen.     

Retrospective analysis of time to recurrence in the ATAC trial according to hormone receptor status: an hypothesis-generating study.

PURPOSE: Arimidex, tamoxifen alone, or in combination (ATAC) trial of anastrozole (Arimidex) versus tamoxifen or a combination of the two in 9,366 postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer found a significant improvement in disease-free survival and time to recurrence (TTR) for anastrozole compared with tamoxifen, that was restricted to patients with hormone receptor-positive (ie, estrogen receptor-positive [ER+] and/or progesterone receptor-positive [PgR+]) disease, the target population for these therapies. We retrospectively tested the hypothesis that this benefit might differ according to PgR status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TTR was compared between the three treatment groups for subgroups defined by ER and PgR status using Cox's proportional hazards model, with and without adjustment for baseline variables. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for anastrozole versus tamoxifen for TTR was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.87) for women with either ER+ or PgR+ tumors. In the ER+/PgR+ subgroup (n = 3,834) the HR was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02) compared with 0.43 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.61) in the ER+/PgR-negative (PgR-) subgroup (n = 880). In the adjusted model the HRs were 0.83 and 0.45, respectively. CONCLUSION: Time to recurrence was longer for anastrozole- than tamoxifen-treated patients in both ER+/PgR+ and ER+/PgR- subgroups, but the benefit was substantially greater in the PgR- subgroup. As this was an "exploratory" analysis, this effect should be considered as hypothesis generating and assessed prospectively in other trials comparing the adjuvant use of an aromatase inhibitor with tamoxifen.     

The relationship between hormone receptor content and the effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in operable breast cancer

The relationship between hormone receptor status and the effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer remains controversial. This article presents the results of a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen (40 mg daily for 2 years) versus no adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients. During 1976 to 1984, 1,407 patients were included in the study. Of these, 427 (30%) had high-risk tumors (pN + or pT greater than 30 mm) and were included in a concurrent randomized comparison of postoperative radiotherapy versus adjuvant polychemotherapy. The mean follow-up time was 61/2 years. Tamoxifen improved the recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P less than .01), but the overall survival difference in favor of the tamoxifen-allocated patients was not significant. Data on estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content were available in 750 patients. Their mean follow-up time was 41/2 years. The effect of tamoxifen was significantly related to ER level (P less than .01). No benefit with tamoxifen was observed among ER-negative patients. The relation to PgR level was of borderline significance (P = .06). Multivariate analysis indicated that most of the interaction between treatment and receptor content was explained by the interaction with ER (P less than .01). The PgR status appeared to modify the effect of tamoxifen among the ER-positive patients and the greatest effect was observed among patients who were positive for both receptors. However, the additional predictive information provided by the PgR assay did not help to identify an unresponsive subgroup of patients.     

The influence of tamoxifen treatment on the oestrogen receptor in metachronous contralateral breast cancer

Adjuvant tamoxifen treatment reduces the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC). The aim of the study was to investigate the hypothesis that adjuvant tamoxifen reduces the occurrence of oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positive CBC, but not the growth of ER-negative CBCs, and to examine survival after diagnosis of CBC. For the study, ER status was immunohistochemically assessed in CBCs of 35 tamoxifen-treated patients and 115 patients without previous hormonal treatment. Cases were retrieved from a series of patients treated from 1984 to 1995 at nine hospitals. The interval between ipsi- and contralateral breast cancer was at least 1 year. It was seen that the proportion of patients with an ER-negative CBC was significantly higher among those with prior tamoxifen treatment: 37% vs 18% (P=0.047). No difference between the two groups in overall and disease-specific survival following CBC was found. However, the stage differed for both groups: tamoxifen users more often had node-positive contralateral disease (P= 0.045). In conclusion, metachronous CBCs developing after 1-3 years of tamoxifen treatment are more often ER-negative breast cancers. So far this does not seem to have a major impact on survival.     

Tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor status, estrogen receptor level, and clinical outcome of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

The relations among pretreatment tumor-proliferative activity, progesterone receptor (PgR) status, estrogen receptor (ER) level, and clinical outcome were analyzed in a series of 45 ER-positive advanced breast cancer postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen (20 mg/day) until disease progression. Tritiated thymidine ([3H]dThd) Labeling Index (LI) by autoradiographic assay was utilized for proliferative activity analysis, whereas the dextran-coated charcoal method was used for ER and PgR evaluation (cutoff value, 10 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). The median [3H]dThd LI value was 1.8%; 73% of cases were PgR positive, and 53% were highly ER positive (greater than 100 fmol/mg of protein cytosol). Clinical responses were more frequently observed in slowly than in quickly proliferating tumors (86% versus 60%; P less than 0.05) but were similar for PgR-positive and -negative cases, as well as for those with high and low ER positivity. Only [3H]dThd LI was found to individualize patients with different survival rates (at 40 mo of follow-up, 78% versus 40% in slowly and quickly proliferating tumors, respectively). The [3H]dThd LI, monitored in ten patients by a second tumor biopsy after 14 days of tamoxifen therapy, was found to have a significantly lower median value (P = 0.03). These data indicate that pretreatment [3H]dThd LI provides information, which is not available in a study of PgR and ER status, on the clinical outcome of ER-positive advanced breast cancer patients treated by hormone therapy.     

Lack of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in the plasma membrane is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in breast cancer

G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), or GPR30, is a membrane receptor reported to mediate non-genomic estrogen responses. Tamoxifen is a partial agonist at GPER in vitro. Here, we investigated if GPER expression is prognostic in primary breast cancer, if the receptor is treatment-predictive for adjuvant tamoxifen, and if receptor subcellular localization has any impact on the prognostic value. Total and plasma membrane (PM) GPER expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in breast tumors from 742 postmenopausal lymph node-negative patients subsequently randomized for tamoxifen treatment for 2–5 years versus no systemic treatment, regardless of estrogen receptor (ER) status, and with a median follow-up of 17 years for patients free of event. PM GPER expression was a strong independent prognostic factor for poor prognosis in breast cancer without treatment-predictive information for tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen-treated ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive patient subgroup, the absence of PM GPER (53 % of all ER-positive tumors) predicted 91 % 20-year distant disease-free survival, compared to 73 % in the presence of GPER (p = 0.001). Total GPER expression showed positive correlations with ER and PgR and negative correlation with histological grade, but the correlations were biphasic. On the other hand, PM GPER expression showed strong negative correlations with ER and PgR, and strong positive correlation with HER2 overexpression and high histological grade. GPER overexpression and PM localization are critical events in breast cancer progression, and lack of GPER in the PM is associated with excellent long-term prognosis in ER-positive and PgR-positive tamoxifen-treated primary breast cancer.     

Distribution of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary tumor and lymph nodes in individual patients with breast cancer

Primary breast cancer tissue and lymph nodes were obtained from 48 patients. Estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) were determined by a dextran-coated charcoal assay. ER were present in 72.9% of the primary tumors and in 62.4% of the malignant lymph nodes, whereas PgR were present in 73.0% and 50.0% of the cases, respectively. The primary tumor and the corresponding malignant lymph nodes showed an identical ER and PgR status, i.e., both tumor sites were receptor positive or both receptor negative in 89.6% and 77.1%, respectively. However, 10.4% of the patients had ER-positive tumors but ER-negative lymph nodes and 22.9% had PgR-positive primaries with PgR-negative lymph nodes. No receptor-positive lymph nodes showed a combination with receptor-negative primary tumor. This preliminary data shows that receptor-positive malignant lymph nodes mostly display the same receptor status as the corresponding primary tumor, whereas receptor-negative lymph nodes may have a receptor-positive primary tumor.     

Steroid hormone receptor activity of primary human breast cancer and pattern of first metastasis

Summary A series of 258 breast cancer patients with known estrogen receptor (ER) status of the primary tumour who subsequently developed metastases were reviewed for site of first metastasis. In 188 cases progesterone receptor (PgR) data were also available.Univariate analysis showed metastatic patterns to differ statistically significantly related to ER status and (less pronounced) PgR status of the primary tumour. Patients with ER-positive tumours had bone metastases three times more often than patients with ER-negative tumours. With respect to PgR-positive and PgR-negative tumours this frequency differed by a factor of two. With regard to visceral metastases ER and PgR status were equally potent prognosticators, patients with receptor negative tumours having a 50% higher frequency of visceral metastasis than patients with receptor positive tumours. Assessment of metastatic patterns in relation to combined receptor status did not substantially enhance the discriminatory value of ER and PgR when assessed separately.Multivariate analysis showed that the observed differences in metastatic patterns were all attributable to differences in the ER status of the primary tumour, and were not influenced by age, menopausal status, axillary lymph node involvement, duration of disease-free interval (DFI), mode of postoperative treatment, or the PgR status of the primary tumour.Including the Departments of Surgery (Th. Wobbes, R.F. v.d. Sluis), Radiotherapy (W.A.J. v. Daal), Pathology (R. Holland), Radiology (J.H.C.L. Hendriks), and Medical Oncology (D. Wagener)     

Prognostic value of hormone receptors in breast cancer

The aim of this study was to establish the role of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) as prognostic indicators for early recurrence and survival. In all, among breast cancer patients, 166 patients who had undergone radical or extended radical mastectomy were studied. These patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy alone for 2-3 years after surgery. No patients had adjuvant endocrine therapy. Local recurrence and/or distant metastases were treated by endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy. The relapse-free interval was not different between the ER-positive and ER-negative patients. The postrelapse survival curve was significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the relapse-free interval and the postrelapse survival curve between the PgR-positive and PgR-negative patients. These results suggest that ER is a good predictor of the response to endocrine therapy given after relapse, but not of early recurrence.     

Measurement of steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer patients on tamoxifen

Summary Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive breast tumors often respond to tamoxifen, but ultimately progress as they become tamoxifen resistant. An accurate assessment of receptor status in specimens from tamoxifen-resistant patients could help to understand potential mechanisms of resistance and to predict response to second line hormonal therapies. However, since tamoxifen itself can affect ER and PgR determinations, assay results can be misleading. We measured ER and PgR by both ligand binding (LBA) and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays in 34 tumors from patients on tamoxifen, 30 of whom were displaying resistance to the drug. These tumors were classified into several receptor phenotypes. Eleven patients, 8 of whom were clearly progressing, expressed both receptors while on tamoxifen. ER was significantly less often negative when measured by IHC, suggesting that ER status by LBA was falsely negative in this group due to receptor occupancy by tamoxifen. Six patients had no detectable ER by LBA or IHC but still expressed PgR. The presence of PgR suggests that ER could still be functional, though undetectable, in these tumors, or that PgR is constitutively expressed by them. Finally, 12 patients were ER and PgR-negative by both assays, suggesting hormonal independence as the mechanism for resistance in this group. In a subset of patients with receptor assays both prior to tamoxifen and at the time of progression while taking the drug, we found that most ER-positive tumors converted to an apparent ER-negative status when assayed by LBA, while PgR status frequently remained unchanged. The continued expression of ER and/or PgR in many patients with tumor progression on tamoxifen indicates that mechanisms for resistance other than receptor loss are common in breast cancer.Deceased     

Epidermal growth factor receptor-negative tumors are predominantly confined to the subgroup of estradiol receptor-positive human primary breast cancers

A total of 725 human primary breast tumor biopsy samples were analyzed for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) content, using a multiple-point EGFR assay standardized in accordance with the recommendations of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Receptor Study Group. After the establishment of a lower cell membrane protein threshold of 0.2 mg of membrane protein per ml of assay buffer, the results of 27% (194 samples) of the EGFR determinations were excluded from the study because of insufficient assay membrane protein content. Of the remaining 531 breast tumor biopsy samples, 57% (302 samples) were shown to be EGFR positive by Scatchard analysis, with a median value of 40 fmol/mg of membrane protein. Of the breast tumor biopsy samples, 72% (380 samples) were estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and 65% (344 samples) were progesterone receptor (PgR) positive. EGFR positivity was found in 46% (173 of 380) of ER-positive and in 85% (129 of 151) of ER-negative breast tumor biopsy samples (P less than 0.0001), as well as in 49% (168 of 344) of PgR-positive and in 72% (134 of 186) of PgR-negative breast tumor biopsy samples (P less than 0.0001). Mean EGFR levels in ER-positive breast tumor biopsy samples were lower than they were in ER-negative ones, 40 +/- 31 (SD) against 72 +/- 55 fmol/mg of membrane protein (P less than 0.0001). Similarly, mean EGFR levels in PgR-positive breast tumor biopsy samples were lower than they were in PgR-negative ones, 41 +/- 29 against 70 +/- 56 fmol/mg of membrane protein (P less than 0.0001). Both EGFR positivity and EGFR levels decreased with increasing steroid hormone receptor levels. A multivariate analysis showed only ER to be independently associated with EGFR.     

Relative effect of steroid hormone receptors on the prognosis of patients with operable breast cancer. A univariate and multivariate analysis of 3089 Japanese patients with breast cancer from the Study Group for the Japanese Breast Cancer Society on Hormone Receptors and Prognosis in Breast Cancer.

In a retrospective multicenter study to investigate the correlation between estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone receptors (PgR) in primary breast cancer with patient prognosis, 3118 patients with operable breast cancer (International Union Against Cancer Stages I, II, and III) were investigated from ten hospitals in Japan who underwent surgery from October 1972 to December 1982; 3089 were evaluable. The ER-positive and PgR-positive cancers were found in 56% and 34% of patients, respectively. The positivities decreased as the tumor size increased but were independent on lymph node metastasis. There were no significant differences in relapse-free survival (RFS) in relation to receptor status (median follow-up, 89 months [ER], 84 months [PgR]). However, in patients with four or more positive nodes, those with PgR-positive cancer had a longer RFS. The patients with ER-positive cancer survived significantly longer than ER-negative ones, with the greatest difference seen in those with four or more positive nodes. There was a significantly longer postrelapse survival (PRS) for patients with ER-positive cancer because of the different distribution of the major metastasis and better responses to first-line and subsequent treatments. Cox's multivariate analysis showed that overall survival but not PRS was affected by ER (and more weakly by PgR) because of the longer PRS in patients with ER-positive cancer.     

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hormone receptor status for predicting response to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The importance of establishing hormone receptor status of tumors for the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has been emphasized, however, there is no general agreement as to how immunohistochemical assays should be evaluated. It is critical to evaluate hormone receptor status when considering response to endocrine therapy. METHODS: Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression was examined by immunohistochemistry using Allred's score for primary breast tumors from 75 metastatic breast cancer patients who received first-line treatment with endocrine therapy (56 patients received tamoxifen, 11 patients received aromatase inhibitors, and 8 patients received LH-RH agonist or other endocrine reagents) on relapse. Correlation between hormone receptor status and response to endocrine therapy as well as post-relapse survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The most significant correlation between positive ER expression and response to any endocrine therapy (p = 0.011) or tamoxifen only (p = 0.030) occurred when the cutoff score was set at 10%. When the evaluation was based on Allred's score (TS), a cutoff point of TS>or=4 showed a more significant association between positive ER expression and response to all kinds of endocrine therapy (p = 0.020) or tamoxifen only (p = 0.047). When evaluated at a cutoff point of 1% positive cells, there were fifteen patients with both ER- and PgR-negative tumors, and three patients (20.0%) responded to the therapy. Patients with 1% or more ER or PgR positive cells had better survival after relapse (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion score alone might be enough to predict hormone responsiveness and post-relapse survival in metastatic breast cancer. The cutoff might be set low, for example 1%, especially for metastatic disease.     

Comparative study of estrogen receptor assays between immunocytochemical assay using monoclonal antibody and the dextran- coated charcoal method

Estrogen receptor (ER) was measured by the estrogen receptor-immunocytochemical assay (ER-ICA) using monoclonal antibody in 36 mammary carcinomas. Simultaneously, ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) were measured by the dextran coated charcoal (DCC) method. In ER-ICA, tumor cells with estrogen receptors were histologically observed. The proportion of ER-positive tumor cells among tumor tissues and the levels of staining intensity were also examined. Results were compared to those obtained by the dextran coated charcoal (DCC) method. Tumors were evaluated as ER-ICA-positive when they contained more than 10% ER-positive cells. ER at a level of more than 5.0 fmol/mg protein was evaluated ER-positive and PgR at more than 5.0 fmol/mg protein as PgR-positive by the DCC method. Twenty-one out of 24 ER-ICA-positive tumors were ER-positive by the DCC method, and 11 out of 12 ER-ICA-negative tumors were ER-negative by the DCC method. Correlation of ER-ICA and ER by the DCC method was 88.9%. There were 11 PgR-positive tumors, and all were included among ER-ICA-positive tumors which had a high proportion of ER-positive cells and high staining intensities.     

Hormone receptors and disease-free survival in breast cancer: impact of increasing threshold levels

Laboratory data from Milan and Houston were evaluated to determine the extent to which the distribution of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) has changed with time. Results from over 11,500 ER and over 8,200 PgR determinations (6,194 ER and 3,127 PgR from Milan) were analyzed. All assays in Milan were performed by a dextran-coated charcoal method and in Houston by a sucrose density-gradient method. The data demonstrate a time-dependent, upward drift in the amount of ER and PgR detected, with the effect most pronounced at the lower end of the distribution curves. We attribute this change to optimization of all facets of the receptor assay procedures (tissue harvesting and storage) as well as to a change in breast cancer biology. These results suggest that studies correlating certain biological parameters with receptor status (whether using qualitative or quantitative scales) need to be re-examined. For example, a population of 349 node-negative patients who did not receive any adjuvant treatment was studied in Milan to determine any association between disease-free survival (DFS) and receptor status. If the "historical" threshold values (10 fmol/mg protein) were used to determine receptor status, no significant difference in DFS at 5 years was detected. Even the combination of ER and PgR did not improve the predictive power of receptor status. In the premenopausal subgroup, ER status did predict the 5-year DFS. However, if the threshold value for PgR was adjusted to 25 fmol/mg protein, patients with ER-positive, PgR-positive tumors had significantly better 5-year DFS than patients with ER-negative, PgR-negative tumors. In addition, PgR status alone was associated with significantly improved 3-year DFS if the subgroups of PgR less than 5 fmol/mg protein and PgR greater than 100 fmol/mg protein were compared. We conclude from these data that: 1) historical threshold values for receptor positivity should be re-examined in all laboratories; 2) studies involving receptor results determined over an extended period of time should attempt to "normalize" these results; and 3) the quantitative assessment of receptor status should be used whenever possible.     

Human breast cancer: survival from first metastasis

Summary Survival from the detection of first metastasis (SAM) was analyzed in a single center series of 258 patients with advanced breast cancer. During the 15 year period covered by this study 230 patients died, 215 of their disease. The overall median SAM was 28 months.Univariate analysis of SAM stratified by first dominant site of metastasis, estrogen receptor status (ER), progesterone receptor status (PgR), tumor size, axillary lymph node status, patient age, menopausal status, and disease-free interval (DFI) showed the first dominant site of metastasis, ER, PgR, and axillary lymph node status to be significantly associated with SAM. Patients with visceral metastasis as first dominant site of metastasis had significantly shorter survival than those with either bone or soft tissue metastasis, median SAM 16 vs. 34 vs. 41 months respectively (P<0.001). SAM also differed according to the steroid hormone receptor status of the primary tumor: median SAM 34 and 33 months for patients with ER-positive or patients with PgR-positive tumors against 14 months for patients with ER-negative or with PgR-negative tumors (P<0.001). Patients with axillary lymph node involvement at primary disease had a shorter SAM than those without, median SAM 24 vs. 35 months (P=0.006). No association between SAM and either tumor size, patient age, menopausal status, or DFI could be observed.Multivariate analysis including first dominant site of metastasis, ER, PgR, and axillary lymph node status showed the first dominant site of metastasis, ER, and axillary lymph node status to be independently associated with SAM.including the Departments of Surgery (Th. Wobbes, R.F. v.d. Sluis), Radiotherapy (W.A.J. v. Daal), Pathology (R. Holland), Radiology (J.H.C.L. Hendriks) and Medical Oncology (D. Wagener)     

Potential predictive value of Bcl-2 for response to tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting of node-positive breast cancer

Approximately 50% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) and 70%-80% of patients with ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive BC respond to hormonal therapy. Additional predictive markers are needed. A group of 287 patients with ER- and/or PgR-positive tumors was selected from 804 patients previously enrolled in a multicenter phase III trial. Bcl-2 expression was evaluated and correlated with response to adjuvant tamoxifen and survival. Estrogen receptor and PgR were determined by biochemical means and Bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry. With a median follow-up of 76 months (95 relapses and 60 deaths), of the 287 patients with, 187 (65%) had Bcl-2-positive tumors and 78 of these patients received tamoxifen. Of the 100 patients with Bcl-2-negative disease, 51 received tamoxifen and 49 regular follow-up. Using patients treated with tamoxifen as a reference, a univariate analysis of disease-free interval for patients who did not receive tamoxifen showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.82-2.44; P = 0.21) for patients with Bcl-2-positive disease and a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.55-1.99; P = 0.89) for patients with Bcl-2-negative disease (P = 0.48). After adjusting for number of positive lymph nodes, degree of receptor and PgR positivity, and type of surgery, the HRs were 1.54 (95% CI, 0.87-2.73; P = 0.14) for Bcl-2-positive disease and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.52-2.11; P = 0.88) for Bcl-2-negative disease. Despite its being a retrospective nonrandomized study with a relatively low number of patients, our results suggest that Bcl-2 deserves further evaluation as a predictive factor of sensitivity to tamoxifen.     

pS2 expression and response to hormonal therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

Seventy-two patients with advanced breast carcinoma (42% bone, 25% visceral, 5.5% soft tissue, and 27.5% multiple site metastases) were evaluated to determine the relationship between tumor expression of the estrogen-regulated protein pS2, estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR) content, and response to hormonal therapy. Twenty-nine % of tumors were pS2 positive, 64% were ER positive, and 29% were PgR positive. Of the ER-positive patients (n = 43), 15 (35%) had greater than 10% of the invasive carcinoma which immunostained for pS2 (these were considered pS2 positive). Only 3 of 24 ER-negative tumors were pS2 positive. A weak association between pS2 expression and ER content (P = 0.08) but not PgR content was observed. Of pS2-positive patients, 52% had a partial or complete response to hormonal therapy. In 24% of pS2-positive patients the disease stabilized with treatment. In contrast, 27% of pS2-negative patients had a partial or complete response. In 10% of these patients the disease stabilized. Similar associations between therapeutic response and ER or PgR were not observed. The odds of having a clinical response to hormonal therapy was greater for pS2-positive than for ER- or PgR-positive tumors. pS2 expression may define a subset of ER-positive tumors that are more likely to respond to hormonal treatment.