Gastric Neoplasia Developed After Proximal Gastrectomy: Report of Three Cases

The incidence of proximal gastric cancer is increasing and proximal gastrectomy is widely accepted as a standard operation for early staged proximal gastric cancer. Recently, we encountered three aged patients with distal gastric cancer or adenoma after proximal gastrectomy: one with mucosal adenocarcinoma and two with adenoma. These patients showed that carcinoma or adenoma could develop in the distal gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy. Although gastric remnant cancer has been defined as a cancer that arises in the proximal gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy, it hereafter includes a cancer that arises in the distal gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy. Endoscopic examination of the distal gastric remnant is important in asymptomatic patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy.     

Lymph node dissection in surgical treatment for remnant stomach cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lymphatic flow and the incidence of lymph node metastasis in remnant stomach cancer after distal gastrectomy are obscure. There is consequent controversy about appropriate lymph node dissection in such cases. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-three consecutive patients with remnant stomach cancer and 44 consecutive patients primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach were investigated retrospectively about lymphatic flow by injection of activated carbon particles, and about the incidence of lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: Lymphatic flow and the incidence of lymph node metastasis in remnant stomach cancer after distal gastrectomy without lymph node dissection were the same as those in primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Lymphatic flow after distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection frequently streamed toward the para-aortic lymph nodes through the lymph nodes along the greater curvature and the suprapancreatic lymph nodes. Lymphatic flow toward the jejunal and colonic mesentery was observed regardless of the method of reconstruction. This lymphogenesis was clearly observed, especially in patients with tumors invading the anastomosis site of Billroth-II reconstruction. Station Nos. 110 (lower paraesophageal) and 111 (supradiaphragmatic) lymph nodes were also stained, despite being considered sites of distant metastasis irrespective of the method of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the evidence of altered lymphatic flow and the incidence of lymph node metastases in remnant stomach cancer, left upper abdominal evisceration with para-aortic lymph node dissection should be performed in advanced remnant stomach cancer.     

Postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There have been many reports proposing some advantages of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric ulcer compared to the conventional distal gastrectomy. However, it is not clear whether similar results will be obtained from the patients with early gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Of 50 patients with early gastric cancer, 25 underwent pylorus-preserving gastrectomy under strict criteria and the other 25 underwent distal gastrectomy with Billroth I anastomosis by the same surgeon. The subjects were then interviewed and examined periodically to assess symptoms, food intake, body weight and serum nutritional parameters. Endoscopy and a radioisotope gastric emptying test was performed 1 year after the operation. RESULTS: Many of the patients with pylorus-preserving gastrectomy complained of gastric fullness after meals, resulting in poor food intake; a significant between-group difference was found up to 1 year after the operation. A low incidence of reflux gastritis and slow gastric emptying were confirmed in the patients after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy has advantages over distal gastrectomy in terms of the avoidance of dumping syndrome and protection against duodeno-gastric reflux. However, more time was necessary for improved gastric fullness or food intake. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy should be applied in younger patients with early gastric cancer expecting long survival.     

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy

Backgrounds/aimWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy and compared the clinical outcomes by tumor location and endoscopic treatment modality.MethodsWe reviewed the data of patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy between January 1996 and August 2013. The treatments included endoscopic resection or argon plasma coagulation.ResultsHerein, 107 patients (median age, 65.1 years; 92 men) encompassing 117 cases of gastric neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy were endoscopically treated. Forty of these lesions were located at anastomotic sites; they were treated with endoscopic resection in 29 cases (72.5%) and argon plasma coagulation in 11 cases (27.5%). For 77 lesions located on the non-anastomotic site, endoscopic resection was performed in 68 cases (88.4%) and argon plasma coagulation was performed in nine cases (11.7%; p = 0.031). The mean endoscopic resection duration was significantly longer in the anastomotic site group than in the non-anastomotic site group (43.6 vs. 26.3 min, p = 0.018). Recurrence was observed in five (12.8%) patients in the former and in one (1.3%) in the latter (p = 0.015); all the patients were successfully retreated with endoscopic resection or APC.ConclusionsEndoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in a remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy is effective and safe. However, closely monitoring for recurrence should be conducted, particularly when the tumor is located at the anastomotic site.     

A case of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated remnant gastric carcinoma arising 7 years after distal gastrectomy for EBV associated gastric carcinoma]

A 52-year-old man undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in July 1998 was found to have a 0-IIa type gastric tumor near EC junction in January 2005. Histological examination showed the tumor was moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. As the tumor was diagnosed as mucosal cancer, endoscopic mucosal dissection was performed. But pathological findings showed the depth of cancer cell invasion into deep submucosal layer. Then total resection of remnant stomach was performed. Both tumors were diagnosed as EBV-associated carcinoma. It is speculated that the mucosa changing after initial operation would give risk to a new occurrence of EBV-associated remnant gastric carcinoma. And then follow up after operation is important. Although some cases of EBV-associated remnant gastric carcinoma is found for short period after the primary surgery, our case second primary cancer was found 7 year after primary surgery. Long term follow-up by Endoscopy seems to be important.     

Eleven metachronous early gastric cancers in an elderly woman

We report on a patient with 11 metachronous multiple early gastric cancers treated by gastrectomy after endoscopic resection. An 87-year-old Japanese woman was admitted to our hospital for treatment of four synchronous multiple early gastric cancers detected by endoscopic examination. The patient had a history of two endoscopic treatments for four metachronous early gastric cancers. The pathological findings of four lesions resected by endoscopic resection and four biopsy specimens showed well-differentiated carcinoma. In March 2012, we performed a distal gastrectomy for four lesions. The surgical specimen revealed 3?minute lesions after surgery in addition to these four lesions. Histologically, all seven lesions were intramucosal well-differentiated adenocarcinomas without vascular invasion. Although the incidence of synchronous and metachronous early gastric cancer is reportedly 11?14.5?% and 8.5?14?%, respectively, only two or three lesions are generally present. Moreover, multiple early gastric cancers usually originate as differentiated adenocarcinoma in male elderly patients with intestinal metaplasia. In the present case, there were multiple early gastric cancers, whose origin may be correlated with the background of intestinal metaplasia, in excess of the number generally expected.     

胆汁反流和幽门螺杆菌感染在远端胃切除术后残胃炎发生中的作用

胆汁反流和幽门螺杆菌（H．pylori）感染是远端胃切除术后残胃炎发生的致病因素，但其确切的作用机制尚未明了。目的：明确胆汁反流和H．pylori感染与远端胃切除术后残胃黏膜炎症的相关性。方法：调查281例胃远端切除术后1年以上接受内镜随访的患者，除外胃镜检查发现恶性肿瘤者。内镜下观察残胃炎严重程度；根据炎症和活动性等指标评估残胃黏膜组织学严重程度。观察胆汁反流和H．priori感染对残胃炎内镜下表现和组织学炎症的影响。结果：81．1％的患者具有1级和1级以上程度的内镜下残胃炎，其H．pylori感染率和胆汁反流发生率均显著高于内镜下无明显炎症的患者（分别为20．6％对1．9％，P〈0．01和88．6％对24．5％，P〈0．0001）。有明显胆汁反流的各级残胃炎患者，胃黏膜慢性炎症和活动性程度与无明显胆汁反流的患者相比无显著性差异（P均〉0．05）；但伴有H．pylori感染的各级残胃炎患者，炎症和活动性分数均显著高于H．pylori阴性患者（P均〈0．05）。结论：远端胃切除术后胆汁反流发生率高，而H．pylori感染率降低。胆汁反流加重残胃炎内镜下炎症，而H．pylori感染与残胃炎内镜下和组织学炎症均相关。     

Effect of H. pylori on COX-2 expression in gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori infection is known to induce gastritis, oxidative stress, and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in the gastric mucosa. However, the effect of H. pylori infection on remnant gastritis has not been studied. We investigated whether the severity of remnant gastritis and COX-2 expression were affected by H. pylori infection after distal gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: The study included 97 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in our department between May 1999 and April 2001. All patients underwent endoscopic examination 2 weeks before and 12 weeks after surgery. The presence of H. pylori infection was determined by urease activity, hematoxylin-eosin staining, and immunochemical staining. Histologic remnant gastritis was graded based on the degree of neutrophil infiltration using the updated Sydney System. COX-2 expression was estimated immunohistochemically. RESULTS: Both the degree of neutrophil infiltration and the level of COX-2 expression were significantly higher in patients with than without H. pylori (p<0.05). There was a significant correlation between the degree of neutrophil infiltration and the degree of COX-2 expression (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication may become a treatment for preventing both remnant gastritis as well as remnant gastric carcinoma after distal gastrectomy.     

The nutritional advantages of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Total gastrectomy has generally been performed for the treatment of early gastric cancers involving the upper third of the stomach. However, proximal gastrectomy has also been used for the treatment of cardial early gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: To compare the nutritional parameters after proximal gastrectomy with the parameters after total gastrectomy, and to also determine the advantages of the postoperative nutritional states, a retrospective analysis was made to evaluate the nutritional status of patients with early gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy with those undergoing total gastrectomy. Forty-nine patients were studied for one year after surgery; 9 underwent proximal gastrectomy while 40 had a total gastrectomy. RESULTS: Proximal gastrectomy allowed the patient to better maintain both their nutritional parameters and body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal gastrectomy was thus found to be a beneficial modality for early gastric cancer patients regarding terms of the postoperative nutritional status, in comparison to total gastrectomy.     

Intestinal-type tumour in resected gastric remnant cancer

Lauren's intestinal type of gastric cancer was proposed to be dependent on long-term environmental factors and is always preceded by chronic premalignant change. A cohort study was performed and demonstrated an increased cancer risk of gastric remnant after gastric surgery for benign disease. It is generally believed that after gastrectomy the residual stomach has an environmental change and, thus, enters a neoplastic process. Based on the carcinogenic theory of intestinal-type tumour, it would be of interest to know whether the intestinal-type tumour is more common in gastric remnant cancer. Forty patients with gastric remnant cancer had gastrectomy in the Veterans General Hospital-Taipei. Another 683 patients with primary gastric carcinoma underwent resection and were used as controls. The clinical characteristics, tumour stage and intestinal-type tumour were analysed in gastric remnant cancer and were compared with the various portions of primary gastric carcinoma. Although the overall distribution of intestinal-type carcinoma in gastric remnant (45%) was no different to that of any other portion of stomach cancer, intestinal-type carcinoma was more common in the early stage of gastric remnant (73%) and distal stomach (73%), but not in the proximal stomach (50%), which was supposed to have the same characteristics as the gastric remnant because of identical anatomic location. More than expected, intestinal-type carcinoma in early gastric remnant cancer together with a long incubation interval between primary surgery and later tumour occurrence were compatible with the theory of carcinogenesis of intestinal-type carcinoma.     

Helicobacter pylori induces gastritis and oxidative stress after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Helicobacter pylori is a carcinogen for gastric cancer. There have been few reports on carcinogenesis about H. pylori infection in the gastric remnant after distal gastrectomy. The relationship between carcinogenesis and H. pylori infection was studied by means of inflammation and oxidative stress. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-seven patients who had undergone curative distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer were studied. All patients underwent endoscopic examination 3 months after surgery. The presence of H. pylori was determined using urease rapid test, hematoxylin-eosin staining, and immunohistochemical staining. Fifty-one patients were positive (group A) and 46 patients were negative (group B). The grades of remnant gastritis were scored by updated Sydney System. 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as an oxidative stress marker, was analyzed immunohistochemically, and graded in 4 grades. RESULTS: Both the neutrophil infiltration score and 8-OHdG expression score was higher in group A than group B (p = 0.03 and 0.05). The correlation between the 8-OHdG expression score and the neutrophil infiltration score was significant (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As gastritis is related to oxidative stress, H. pylori infection is suspected to play an important role in carcinogenesis in the gastric remnant.     

Clinicopathologic differences between early gastric remnant cancer and early primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was designed to clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival in early gastric remnant cancer and compare with early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-five patients with early gastric remnant cancer, who underwent resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center and First Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University between 1974 and 1996 were evaluated in this study. Various clinicopathologic characteristics, such as age, sex, symptoms, size of tumor, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, cell differentiation, and survival were investigated and early gastric remnant cancer was compared with early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach. RESULTS: According to the macroscopic type, protruded type such as I or II type accounted for a great majority in early gastric remnant cancer, while II c depressed type was common in early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach, comprising 64.2% of all cases. Pathological examination disclosed that well-differentiated carcinoma and mucosal carcinoma were more frequently observed in early gastric remnant cancer than in early primary cancer in the upper-third of the stomach. The 5-year survival rate was 83.5% for early primary cancer in the upper-third of the stomach. In contrast, no patients experienced recurrence after operation for early gastric remnant cancer. CONCLUSIONS: From the view point of clinicopathological evaluation, gastric remnant cancer is a special from of gastric cancer. A follow-up program is important in order to detect early gastric remnant cancer. A low incidence of lymph node metastasis suggests that endoscopic mucosal resection of the tumor or limited operation could be performed under strict indication.     

Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance of the upper gastrointestinal tract following distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: How endoscopy can be used in the follow-up of the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients who underwent gastrectomy for early gastric cancer remains unclear. METHODOLOGY: Two-hundred and ten patients (137 males and 73 females, aged at initial gastrectomy 27-86, average age 56.5) were followed in the present study. Results of follow-up endoscopy of all patients, pathologic diagnoses of secondary tumors and interval between gastrectomy and detection of secondary tumor were reviewed. Cumulative incidence rate of second tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract was then analyzed. RESULTS: Secondary tumor was observed by follow-up endoscopy in 7 patients including two gastric, one esophageal, one duodenal carcinoma and 3 gastric adenomas. The interval between initial gastrectomy and diagnosis of secondary tumor ranged from 20 to 71 months (average 51.7 months). All carcinomas were early stage and localized within the mucosa. Three patients with secondary cancer were successfully treated by endoscopic mucosal resection. The cumulative incidence rate of secondary cancer in the gastric remnant, esophagus and duodenum at six years after initial gastrectomy was 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5%, respectively. The overall incidence rate of secondary tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract at six years after distal gastrectomy was 4.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that annual follow-up endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract after gastrectomy for early gastric cancer can be introduced to detect carcinoma at an early stage, thus improving the survival rate of gastrectomy patients.     

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Abstract: In 1991, we first performed a simple technique of Iaparoscopy-assisted Bill-roth I gastrectomy for patients with mucosal gastric cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) sometimes fails to completely resect the early gastric cancer lesion, nor does it give full histopathology of the resected stomach. The aim of this study was to review the surgical and pathological findings of eight patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy after EMR for early gastric cancer. Of 54 patients with early gastric cancer who were treated with laparoscopic gastrectomy between 1994 and 1998, eight patients underwent surgery after EMR. The resected margin of the EMR specimens was positive in three and suspicious in five; and three underwent laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach, while five underwent Iaparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection. All but one resected stomach had residual cancer tissue in the mucosa or submucosa, and three patients had multiple gastric cancers. The results indicated that remnant cancer tissue might be present when the resected margin of the EMR specimen was positive or suspicious. Partial resection or distal gastrectomy under laparoscopy is useful for such patients who have undergone EMR for early gastric cancer. (Dig Endooc 1999; 11:132–136)     

Modified Operation to Treat Types II and III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Background/Aims: To study the effects of a gastric tube anastomosis in the intraperitoneal operation for types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methodology: Thirty-one patients with types II and III AEG were selected for proximal gastrectomy. After the proximal gastrectomy by the abdominal approach, the gastric remnant was cut into a tubular shape. The esophagus was then anastomosed to the gastric tube. Results: The surgical technique was performed on all 31 patients with types II or III AEG. The operation time was 279.52±34.99min, average surgery blood loss was 209.68±185.82mL, the number of hospital postoperative days was 10.48±2.01. All cases were followed-up for 2-12 months. One (3.2%) patient had postoperative anastomotic bleeding and another case had intractable hiccups. Only 3 (9.7%) patients felt heartburn after the operation. One (3.2%) patient was found to be suffering from reflux esophagitis through endoscopic examination. In addition, 1 (3.4%) patient had tumor recurrence. Conclusions: Using gastric tubes is a safe surgical technique and is followed by only a small number of complications at the early postoperative stage.     

Duodenogastric reflux eradicates Helicobacter pylori after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients who undergo distal gastrectomy often develop duodenogastric reflux and preoperative H. pylori infection is eradicated spontaneously after distal gastrectomy in some patients. However, whether a causal relationship exists has not yet been studied. This report examines the correlation between H. pylori eradication and the amount of duodenogastric reflux following distal gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: Among 72 consecutive patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer, 37 patients had H. pylori infection preoperatively and were included in this study. The period of bile reflux (percent time) into the gastric remnant was measured with the Bilitec 2000 under standardized conditions on the 14th day after the surgery. Endoscopic examination was performed to determine the presence of H. pylori infection on week 12 after surgery. RESULTS: The percent time was higher in patients whose H. pylori infection had been eradicated after distal gastrectomy (58.1+/-9.2%) than in patients who had H. pylori infection after distal gastrectomy (33.8+/-5.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Duodenogastric reflux correlates with spontaneous eradication of H. pylori infection following distal gastrectomy.     

Postoperative evaluation of the jejunal pouch reconstruction following proximal and distal gastrectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of the jejunal pouch reconstruction following subtotal proximal and distal gastrectomy, a retrospective study examining the postoperative condition of patients who underwent different methods of reconstruction after gastrectomy for cancer was undertaken. METHODOLOGY: Various parameters indicative of postoperative function were evaluated at one year postoperatively, and two major groups were examined. The "proximal gastrectomy" group was composed of patients who underwent either 1) proximal gastrectomy with an interposed jejunal pouch (PG-pouch), 2) proximal gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (PG-inter), or 3) total gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (TG). The "distal gastrectomy" group was composed of patients who underwent either 4) distal gastrectomy with an interposed jejunal pouch (DG-pouch), 5) distal gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (DG-inter), or 6) distal gastrectomy with Billroth 1 reconstruction (B-1). RESULTS: Volume of meal intake was better preserved and the incidence of abdominal symptoms were less frequent in the PG-pouch and DG-pouch groups. In the PG-inter, DG-inter and DG-pouch groups, none of the patients experienced heartburn or had endoscopic findings consistent with reflux esophagitis, while 2 patients (20.0%) in the PG-pouch group complained of heartburn with evidence of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy. Increase in blood acetaminophen level was milder in both the PG-pouch and DG-pouch groups, signifying improved gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: The jejunal pouch interposition following proximal and distal gastrectomy seems to confer clinical benefit in terms of postoperative function, especially in the form of meal intake, abdominal symptoms, and gastric emptying. The side effect of an improved reservoir may be the incidence of reflux esophagitis seen in 2 patients in the PG-pouch group.     

Gastric remnant cancer compared with primary proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, detections of early-stage gastric remnant cancer and small proximal gastric cancer are increasing. The aim of this study was to compare pathologic and prognostic data of gastric remnant cancer with those of primary proximal gastric cancer including upper gastric cancer based on a recent 15-year experience at a single institute in Japan. METHODOLOGY: Among 698 patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer between 1984 and 1998, 15 (2.1%) were patients with gastric remnant cancer. During the same period, 139 patients underwent primary gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer which included 71 with upper gastric cancer confined to the upper one-third of the stomach. Clinicopathologic findings of gastric remnant cancer were compared with those of proximal gastric cancer. RESULTS: Of 15 gastric remnant cancers, 8 (53%) were stage I tumors. Although gastric remnant cancer and proximal gastric cancer was not different in several clinicopathologic factors, gastric remnant cancer and upper gastric cancer confined to the upper one-third of the stomach was different with regard to the frequency of tumor size > or = 4 cm (60% vs. 32%, p < 0.05), poorly differentiated type (67% vs. 38%, p < 0.05), serosal invasion (40% vs. 11%, p < 0.01), lymph node metastasis (47% vs. 20%, p < 0.05), stage III or IV disease (47% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), and noncurative gastrectomy (20% vs. 1%, p < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of gastric remnant cancer (69%) was higher than that of proximal gastric cancer (57%) and lower than that of upper gastric cancer (81%), although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In our recent series, a half of gastric remnant cancers are stage I tumors. Although gastric remnant cancers are similar to proximal gastric cancers, they are more advanced and their surgical results are less satisfactory when compared with upper gastric cancers confined to the upper one-third of the stomach.     

Treatment of gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy by endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife

AIM： To evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife （IT-ESD） for the treatment of patients with gastric remnant cancer. METHODS： Thirty-two patients with early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach, who underwent distal gastrectomy due to gastric carcinoma, were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection （EMR） or ESD at Sumitomo Besshi Hospital and Shikoku Cancer Center in the 10-year period from January 1998 to December 2007, including 17 patients treated with IT-ESD. Retrospectively, patient backgrounds, the one-piece resection rate, complete resection （CR） rate, operation time, bleeding rate, and perforation rate were compared between patients treated with conventional EMR and those treated with IT-ESD. RESULTS： The CR rate （40% in the EMR group vs 82% in the IT-ESD group） was significantly higher in the IT-ESD group than in the EMR group; however, the operation time was significantly longer for the IT- ESD group （57.6 ± 31.9 min vs 21.1 ± 12.2 min）. No significant differences were found in the rate of underlying cardiopulmonary disease （IT-ESD group, 12% vs EMR group, 13%）, one-piece resection rate （100% vs 73%）, bleeding rate （18% vs 6.7%）, and perforation rate （0% vs 0%） between the two groups. CONCLUSION： IT-ESD appears to be an effective treatment for gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy because of its high CR rate. It is useful for histological confirmation of successful treatment. Thelong-term outcome needs to be evaluated in the future.     

Evaluation of reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy: prospective comparative study of jejunal interposition and jejunal pouch interposition

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To prevent various distresses after proximal gastrectomy, reconstruction by interposed jejunal pouch has been advocated as an organ-preserving surgical strategy to ensure favorable quality of life for the patients. METHODOLOGY: Proximal gastrectomy was performed in 9 patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Four patients were randomly selected for reconstruction by jejunal pouch interposition (JPI group), while 5 had reconstruction by jejunal interposition (JI group). The patients who underwent JPI and JI were followed up to evaluate resumption of normal diet, change in body weight, and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: The JPI group showed a significant dietary advantage. Three months after surgery, JPI patients could eat more than 80% of the volume of their preoperative meals, whereas JI patients ate less than 50%. The percentage of postoperative body weight loss was higher in the JI group than in the JPI group because the volume of the remnant stomach was more adequate in the latter. Moreover, it was easier to enter the remnant stomach and duodenum for endoscopic fiberscopy in the JPI group for the treatment of hepato-biliary pancreatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: JPI is an effective method for preservation of gastric function after proximal gastrectomy.