Characteristics of low-risk patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide distribution of different severity scoring systems for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients, low-risk patients are frequently hospitalized, contrary to current recommendations. The aim of our study was to determine the rate, clinical characteristics, and outcome of low-risk patients with CAP admitted to our institution. METHODS: During an 18-month period, we prospectively screened all patients admitted to the Division of Internal Medicine with a presumptive diagnosis of CAP. Pneumonia Outcome Research Team (PORT) score and pneumonia severity index (PSI) were calculated for all patients during the first 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 591 patients had a diagnosis of CAP. Some 196 patients (33.1%) were low-risk (PSI class I, II), 98 (16.6%) intermediate (PSI III), and 297 (50.3%) high-risk patients (PSI IV, V). Patients in low-risk classes were younger (45.5+/-15.8 vs. 65.0+/-12.5 and 74.9+/-11.8 years, respectively, p<0.001) and had fewer background diseases. They had shorter hospitalizations than intermediate- and high-risk groups (4.4+/-3.2, 5.3+/-3.4, and 6.8+/-6.4 days, respectively, p<0.001). There was a significant difference in 30-day mortality between the different risk groups: 0% in the low-risk, 2.0% in the intermediate-risk, and 9.4% in the high-risk group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The considerable proportion of low-risk patients hospitalized due to CAP was found to be comparable to the stable 30% rate reported in the literature. We conclude that physicians tend to opt for a wide safety range when considering a CAP patient hospitalization, rather than make a decision based only on severity score calculation.     

Early mobilization of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if early mobilization (EM) of hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) reduces hospital length of stay. DESIGN: Group randomized trial. SETTING: Three Midwestern hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred fifty-eight patients with CAP admitted to 17 general medical units between November 1997 and April 1998. INTERVENTION: EM was defined as sitting out of bed or ambulating for at least 20 min during the first 24 h of hospitalization. Progressive mobilization occurred each subsequent day during hospitalization. Measurements and results: Intervention (n = 227) and usual-care patients (n = 231) were similar in age, gender, disease severity, door-to-drug delivery time, and IV-to-po switchover time. Hospital length of stay for EM vs usual care was significantly less (mean, 5.8 vs 6.9 days; adjusted absolute difference, 1.1 days; 95% confidence interval, 0.0 to 2.2 days). There were no differences in adverse events or other secondary outcomes between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Like patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction and total knee replacements, EM of hospitalized patients with CAP reduces overall hospital length of stay and institutional resources without increasing the risk of adverse outcomes.     

Impaired flow-mediated dilation in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is complicated by cardiovascular events as myocardial infarction and stroke but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. We hypothesized that endothelial dysfunction may be implicated and that endotoxemia may have a role.MethodsFifty patients with CAP and 50 controls were enrolled. At admission and at discharge, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), serum levels of endotoxins and oxidative stress, as assessed by serum levels of nitrite/nitrate (NOx) and isoprostanes, were studied.ResultsAt admission, a significant difference between patients with CAP and controls was observed for FMD (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 4.0 ± 0.3%, p < 0.001), serum endotoxins (157.8 ± 7.6 vs 33.1 ± 4.8 pg/ml), serum isoprostanes (341 ± 14 vs 286 ± 10 pM, p = 0.009) and NOx (24.3 ± 1.1 vs 29.7 ± 2.2 μM). Simple linear correlation analysis showed that serum endotoxins significantly correlated with Pneumonia Severity Index score (Rs = 0.386, p = 0.006). Compared to baseline, at discharge CAP patients showed a significant increase of FMD and NOx (from 2.1 ± 0.3 to 4.6 ± 0.4%, p < 0.001 and from 24.3 ± 1.1 to 31.1 ± 1.5 μM, p < 0.001, respectively) and a significant decrease of serum endotoxins and isoprostanes (from 157.8 ± 7.6 to 55.5 ± 2.3 pg/ml, p < 0.001, and from 341 ± 14 to 312 ± 14 pM, p < 0.001, respectively). Conversely, no changes for FMD, NOx, serum endotoxins and isoprostanes were observed in controls between baseline and discharge. Changes of FMD significantly correlated with changes of serum endotoxins (Rs = − 0.315; p = 0.001).ConclusionsThe study provides the first evidence that CAP is characterized by impaired FMD with a mechanism potentially involving endotoxin production and oxidative stress.     

The comparison of patients with hospitalized health-care-associated pneumonia to community-acquired pneumonia

Health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is defined as pneumonia that develops in patients with a history of recent hospitalization, hemodialysis as an outpatient, residence in a nursing home, outpatient intravenous therapy and home wound care. We aimed to compare the initial demographic characteristics, causative agents and prognosis between hospitalized HCAP and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. HCAP and CAP patients hospitalized between 01 September 2008-01 September 2009 were evaluated retrospectively. Out of 187 patients (131 males, mean age 66.3 ± 14.3 years) who were hospitalized during one-year period, 98 were diagnosed as HCAP and 89 as CAP. Among HCAP patients, 64 (65.3%) had a history of hospitalization in the last 90 days, 26 (26.5%) received outpatient intravenous therapy, 17 (17.3%) had home wound care, 6 (6.1%) were on hemodialysis program in the last 30 days and 4 (4.1%) lived in a nursing home. The causative pathogen was detected in 39 (39.8%) HCAP and 8 (9.0%) CAP patients. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in HCAP, and Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in CAP patients. Inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment was documented in 8 (25.8%) of 39 HCAP patients, in whom a causative agent was isolated whereas the antibiotic treatment was appropriate in all CAP patients. The duration of hospitalization (14.4 ± 11.4 vs. 10.7 ± 7.9 days, p= 0.011) and mortality rate (34.7% vs. 9.0%, p< 0.001) were higher in HCAP compared with CAP patients. As HCAP is different than CAP in terms of patients' characteristics, causative microorganisms and prognosis, it should be considered in all patients hospitalized as CAP. Potentially drug-resistant microorganisms should be taken into consideration in the empirical antibiotic treatment of these patients.     

Clinical management of immunocompetent hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Background: Clinical practices and guidelines may differ regarding the management of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: The management of 152 consecutive CAP inpatients (70+/-17 years) admitted to a teaching hospital was analyzed retrospectively and compared with published data and an evidence-based guideline developed at our institution. Results: Of the patients studied, 64% had a high prognostic score index (PSI), 14% were admitted to the ICU, and 4.6% died. Initially, patients received either a one-drug (47%) or a two-drug (53%) antibiotic regimen. None of the 20 PSI parameters, and neither the PSI nor admission to the ICU, was associated with the initial antibiotic regimen. Agreement between current practice and our guideline was low (kappa=0.16). Following the recommendations would have led to a decrease of 51% in the initial two-drug regimen. The duration of i.v. antibiotherapy was higher in patients following the two-drug regimen (142+/-150 vs. 102+/-60 h, P<0.05). Chest physiotherapy (CP) and bronchodilatators (BD) were prescribed in 72% and 54% of cases, respectively (median duration 10 days). Conclusions: The variations observed in the clinical management of CAP inpatients were not in agreement with published guidelines. The overuse of a two-drug regimen, CP, and BD necessitates the development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines proposing detailed steps for the management of CAP inpatients.     

Predicting death in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE: To validate a previously reported discriminant rule for predicting mortality in adult patients with primary community-acquired pneumonia and to determine which factors available at hospital admission predict a fatal outcome among such patients. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the hospital for community-acquired pneumonia. MEASUREMENTS: Using stepwise logistic regression, we analyzed prognostic factors (data available at admission and recorded in the medical record) that showed a univariate association with mortality. The predictive values of three discriminant rules were measured to validate the results of a previous study. MAIN RESULTS: Of 245 patients, 20 (8.2%) died. Of 42 prognostic factors identified in previous studies, 8 were associated with mortality, but only a respiratory rate of 30/min or more, a diastolic blood pressure of 60 mm Hg or less, and a blood urea nitrogen of more than 7 mmol/L remained predictive in the multivariate analysis. A discriminant rule composed of these three variables was 70% sensitive and 84% specific in predicting mortality, yielding an overall accuracy of 82%. CONCLUSION: Tachypnea, diastolic hypotension, and an elevated blood urea nitrogen were independently associated with death from pneumonia in our study, confirming the value of a previously reported discriminant rule from the British Thoracic Society. This rule may be useful in triage decisions because it identifies high-risk patients who may benefit from special medical attention.     

Severity classification and prognosis in hospitalized elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia

AIM: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a common and serious illness. CAP can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. This study aims to investigate the precision of disease severity staging scales such as Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Severity Index (PSI) and A-DROP (Age, Dehydration, Respiratory failure, Orientation disturbance, shock blood Pressure) in elderly patients with CAP. For this study, 111 elderly CAP patients admitted to our hospital during a two-year period were recruited and stratified using these scales. METHODS: We reviewed the precision of the above-mentioned scales in the 111 patients aged 65 years or above, and investigated the disease severity classifications, initial treatment, and clinical course of these patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 82 (+/-7.6) years. Among these patients, 15% were aged between 65 and 75 years, 50% were older with their ages ranging from 75 to 84 years, and 35% were extremely old with their ages over 85 years. The mortality rates for the patients with the A-DROP score of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 0%, 0%, 2.2%, 17.2%, 20.0%, and 40.0%, respectively, and those for the patients with PSI class I, II, III, IV, and V were 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, and 36.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSI is a useful method for estimating the prognosis in elderly CAP patients. On the other hand, the A-DROP score may be inadequate in terms of judging the disease severity in these patients. With regard to the severity of pneumonia in elderly patients, we should consider not only the A-DROP score but also the underlying diseases such as malignancy, cardiac failure, cerebrovascular disease, liver disease, or renal disease.     

Causes and risk factors for rehospitalization of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Rehospitalization after inpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia occurs in one-tenth of all hospitalizations, but the clinical circumstances surrounding readmission to the hospital have not been well studied. The objective of this study was to identify the causes and risk factors for rehospitalization of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This project was performed as part of a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial of the implementation of practice guidelines to reduce the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy and duration of hospitalization for patients who have received a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia. The trial was conducted at 7 hospitals in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, from February 1998 through March 1999. The primary outcome for these analyses was rehospitalization within 30 days after the index hospitalization. Two physicians independently assigned the cause of rehospitalization as pneumonia related, comorbidity related, or both; consensus was reached for all assignments. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical factors independently associated with rehospitalization were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 577 patients discharged after hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia, 70 (12%) were rehospitalized within 30 days. The median time to rehospitalization was 8 days (interquartile range, 4-13 days). Overall, 52 rehospitalizations (74%) were comorbidity related, and 14 (20%) were pneumonia related. The most frequent comorbid conditions responsible for rehospitalization were cardiovascular (n = 19), pulmonary (n = 6) and neurological (n = 6) in origin. Less than a high school education (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.4), unemployment (odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-12.3), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.7), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.1) were independently associated with rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of rehospitalizations following pneumonia are comorbidity related and are the result of underlying cardiopulmonary and/or neurologic diseases. Careful attention to the clinical stability of patients with these coexisting conditions at and following hospital discharge may decrease the frequency of rehospitalization of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.     

Role of 'atypical pathogens' among adult hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Background and objective: Agents such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila are recognized as important causes of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) worldwide. This study examined the role of these ‘atypical pathogens’ (AP) among adult hospitalized patients with CAP. Methods: A prospective, observational study of consecutive adult CAP (clinico‐radiological diagnosis) patients hospitalized during 2004–2005 was conducted. Causal organisms were determined using cultures, antigen testing and paired serology. Clinical/laboratory/radiological variables and outcomes were compared between different aetiologies, and a clinical prediction rule for AP was constructed. Results: There were 1193 patients studied (mean age 70.8 ± 18.0 years, men 59.3%). Causal organisms were identified in 468 (39.2%) patients: ‘bacterial’ (48.7%), ‘viral’ (26.9%), ‘AP’ (28.6%). The AP infections comprised Mycoplasma or Chlamydophila pneumoniae (97.8%) and co‐infection with bacteria/virus (30.6%). The majority of AP infections involved elderly patients (63.4%) with comorbidities (41.8%), and more than one‐third of patients were classified as ‘intermediate’ or ‘high’ risk CAP on presentation (pneumonia severity index IV–V (35.1%); CURB‐65 2–5 (42.5%)). Patients with AP infections had disease severities and outcomes similar to patients with CAP due to other organisms (oxygen therapy 29.1% vs 29.8%; non‐invasive ventilation 3.7% vs 3.3%; admission to the intensive care unit 4.5% vs 2.7%; length of hospitalization 6 day vs 7 day; 30‐day mortality: 2.2% vs 6.0%; overall P > 0.05). Age <65 years, female gender, fever ≥38.0°C, respiratory rate <25/min, pulse rate <100/min, serum sodium >130 mmol/L, leucocyte count <11 × 10⁹/L and Hb < 11 g/dL were features associated with AP infection, but the derived prediction rule failed to reliably discriminate CAP caused by AP from bacterial CAP (area under the curve 0.75). Conclusions: M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae as single/co‐pathogens are important causes of severe pneumonia among older adults. No reliable clinical indicators exist, so empirical antibiotic coverage for hospitalized CAP patients may need to be considered.     

Short-term outcomes and their predictors for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE: This study of patients who were hospitalized with pneumonia describes 4 short-term outcomes and the relative value of 4 variables for predicting the outcomes. METHOD: We prospectively documented 4 short-term outcomes (hospital length of stay, discharge location, death, 30-day readmission) among 213 adults (mean age = 72.5 years) with pneumonia who were admitted to the hospital. Relationships between the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), preadmission walking, malnutrition, grip strength, and outcomes were examined with correlations and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean (SD) hospital stay was 8.8 (10.4) days. Many patients (51.6%) were not discharged to their homes; 13.6% died during admission or within 30 days of discharge. Of 205 patients discharged alive, 23.9% were readmitted within 30 days. All predictor variables correlated significantly with length of stay, discharge, and death. Except for grip strength, all predictor variables correlated significantly with readmission. Regression showed that the PSI contributed significantly to the prediction of all outcomes but that other variables also contributed (R(2) =.099 [readmitted] to.484 [discharged to home]). CONCLUSIONS: Because malnutrition and physical performance measures independently predicted or added to the PSI's prediction of untoward outcomes, the measures merit inclusion when assessing patients with pneumonia.     

The controversy of combination vs monotherapy in the treatment of hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: The majority of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients (about 80%) will be treated as outpatients, because therapy with a single agent will work. For the remaining 20% of patients requiring hospitalization, there is some growing debate regarding the efficacy of different management approaches. For hospitalized patients, monotherapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone agent seems to be gaining popularity, but dual therapy combining a beta-lactam and an advanced macrolide still represents a good choice. Indeed, this regimen was recommended for all of the inpatient categories in the latest Infectious Disease Society of America CAP guidelines in 2003. AIM: The purpose of this review was to examine the current clinical evidence to support one option or the other by gathering all of the available published literature. We will review the existing controversies in terms of microbiology, immunology, and clinical outcomes comparing dual therapy (ie, with any combination of beta-lactams, macrolides, or fluoroquinolones) with monotherapy in the treatment of CAP. RESULTS: For the vast majority of patients with CAP (ie, outpatients and inpatients on medical wards), the type of antibiotic regimen prescribed does not have any significant impact. For patients with severe pneumonia, for which there is no accepted definition so far, the controversy remains alive. Mortality from pneumococcal pneumonia has been reduced over the last decades, but despite improved medical care, bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia is still as lethal as ever, probably because of the aging population, the greater number of immunocompromised patients, and the number of patients with frequent comorbid conditions. Worldwide, the increasing rates of resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to antibiotics are also a serious concern, and the clinical implications are not always obvious. Although limited in number, the four studies showing the importance of adding a macrolide to a beta-lactam regimen for the treatment of bacteremic S pneumoniae pneumonia are retrospective and nonblinded, the findings are consistent, and they point to a trend that has to be explored more thoroughly. Studies published in the last few years suggest that combination therapy may be superior for bacteremic S pneumoniae pneumonia. CONCLUSION: In the meantime, for practical purposes, patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of severe CAP may benefit from a dual antibiotic therapy combining a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide. For the majority of hospitalized patients with CAP who are not severely ill, fluoroquinolone monotherapy remains an approved, tested, and reliable option. Indeed, the time for more aggressive outpatient fluoroquinolone therapy may reduce the number of patients who are hospitalized with CAP. Independent prospective studies comparing combination therapy with standard monotherapy are urgently required for hospitalized patients with severe CAP.     

Causes and factors associated with early failure in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Early failure is a matter of great concern in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. However, information on its causes and risk factors is lacking. METHODS: Observational analysis of a prospective series of 1383 nonimmunosuppressed hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Early failure was defined as lack of response or worsening of clinical or radiologic status at 48 to 72 hours requiring changes in antibiotic therapy or invasive procedures. Concordance of antimicrobial therapy was examined for cases with an etiologic diagnosis. RESULTS: At 48 to 72 hours, 238 patients (18%) remained febrile, but most of them responded without further changes in antibiotic therapy. Eighty-one patients (6%) had early failure. The main causes of early failure were progressive pneumonia (n = 54), pleural empyema (n = 18), lack of response (n = 13), and uncontrolled sepsis (n = 9). Independent factors associated with early failure were older age (>65 years) (odds ratio [OR], 0.35), multilobar pneumonia (OR, 1.81), Pneumonia Severity Index score greater than 90 (OR, 2.75), Legionella pneumonia (OR, 2.71), gram-negative pneumonia (OR, 4.34), and discordant antimicrobial therapy (OR, 2.51). Compared with treatment responders, early failures had significantly higher rates of complications (58% vs 24%) and overall mortality (27% vs 4%) (P<.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Early failure is infrequent but is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Its detection and management require careful clinical assessment. Most cases occur because of inadequate host-pathogen responses. Discordant therapy is a less frequent cause of failure, which may be preventable by rational application of the current antibiotic guidelines.     

Efficacy of exclusively oral antibiotic therapy in patients hospitalized with nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of oral antibiotics in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia and to identify factors precluding oral therapy. METHODS: In a meta-analysis, we compared inpatient oral and parenteral therapy in community-acquired pneumonia. Studies were reviewed independently and rated by two reviewers, and results were summarized. We also performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia and compared outcomes in patients treated with oral versus parenteral therapy. RESULTS: For the meta-analysis, we identified seven studies involving 1366 patients. Study exclusions included severe pneumonia or impaired oral absorption. There was no significant difference in the relative risk of mortality at the end of treatment or at follow-up. Mean length of hospital stay was shorter (6.1 days vs. 7.8 days) in patients taking oral antibiotics than in those taking the parental form. In the retrospective cohort, 18% (124/698) of patients received oral-only therapy; these patients were younger (median age, 75 vs. 78 years, P = 0.01) and had lower mean pneumonia severity index scores (101 vs. 119, P <0.0001) than those who received parenteral therapy. In multivariable models, oral-only patients had a median length of stay that was 1.3 days shorter (95% CI: 0.4% to 2.2% days; P = 0.008) and a median antibiotic cost that was 56 dollars lower (95% CI: 53 dollars to 58 dollars; P <0.0001) than that of patients in the parenteral group, but mortality was similar. CONCLUSION: Although prospective data are limited, oral antibiotics in certain hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia are effective. More data are needed to identify appropriate candidates for exclusively oral antibiotic therapy.     

A randomized trial comparing the cardiac rhythm safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

CONTEXT: Antimicrobial cardiac safety is of particular concern during the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in elderly patients, due to the presence of comorbid conditions and the use of multiple medications that may individually or synergistically affect cardiac repolarization. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the cardiac rhythm safety of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in elderly patients hospitalized with CAP. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted at 47 hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Subjects > or = 65 years old with clinical signs/symptoms of CAP requiring initial parenteral therapy, including those with comorbidities. The safety population included 394 patients: 51.3% male; 85.3% white; mean age, 77.8 years. Two-thirds of the patients were > 75 years old, and 74.1% had a history of cardiac disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received IV/oral moxifloxacin (400 mg qd) or IV/oral levofloxacin (500 mg qd) for 7 to 14 days. Safety evaluations included 72 h of digital continuous 12-lead Holter monitoring, 12-lead ECGs at baseline and at maximum serum concentration on day 3, and adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary safety end point was a composite of ventricular arrhythmia events based on Holter monitoring. RESULTS: Holter monitor data were available for 387 patients (192 receiving moxifloxacin and 195 receiving levofloxacin). Sixteen moxifloxacin-treated patients (8.3%) and 10 levofloxacin-treated patients (5.1%) had a primary composite cardiac event (p = 0.29); most events were nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) [14 patients receiving moxifloxacin, 7.3%; and 10 patients receiving levofloxacin, 5.1%]. One moxifloxacin-treated patient had sustained monomorphic VT (> 30 s), and one levofloxacin-treated patient had torsade de pointes. Mean +/- SD QTc (Fridericia formula) change on day 3 was + 6.4 +/- 23.2 ms for moxifloxacin and - 2.5 +/- 22.9 ms for levofloxacin (p = 0.04). No deaths clearly related to study drugs occurred during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: IV/oral moxifloxacin, although known to cause QTc interval prolongation, has a comparable cardiac rhythm safety profile to IV/oral levofloxacin in high-risk elderly patients with CAP.     

Aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adult patients in New Caledonia

Objective To describe the aetiology of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized adult patients in New Caledonia, a French archipelago in the South Pacific. Methods Confirmed CAP patients (n = 137) were enrolled prospectively. Pathogens were detected by culture, molecular methods, serology on paired sera, immunofluorescence on nasopharyngeal swabs and antigen detection in urine. Results The aetiology of CAP was determined in 82 of 137 cases (59.8%), of which 31 exhibited two or more pathogens (37.8%). Hundred and seventeen pathogens were detected: Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common one (41.0%), followed by influenza virus A (22.1%) and Haemophilus influenzae (10.2%). The frequency of atypical bacteria was low (6.0%). The most frequent and significant coinfection was S. pneumoniae with influenza A virus (P = 0.004). Influenza virus was detected from nasopharyngeal swabs in four patients (15.4% of patients tested for influenza) and by PCR from pulmonary specimens in 15 patients (57.7%). Conclusions Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of CAP in New Caledonian adults. Viral–bacterial co‐infections involving S. pneumoniae and influenza virus are very common during the winter. Such adult patients hospitalized with CAP are a clear sentinel group for surveillance of influenza. Vaccination against influenza and S. pneumoniae should be strengthened when risk factors are identified.     

社区获得性肺炎老年住院患者的临床分析

目的调查社区获得性肺炎(CAP)老年住院患者的临床资料,分析其病原特点、严重程度及预后,以供临床参考.方法回顾分析CAP住院患者的临床资料,对照分析研究其年龄、基础病、1年内因肺炎住院史、病原学特点和CAP严重程度及死亡率.结果 315例CAP中,男215例,女100例,年龄18～102岁,平均(64±24)岁.根据年龄分为老年组252例(80%);非老年组63例(20%).180例(57.2%)未能明确病原.基础病的特点为,非老年组CAP患者基础病少;老年组CAP患者均患1种以上的基础病.CAP患者严重程度分层和转归按肺炎预后评分系统(PORT)进行分层,Ⅰ级31例(9.9%),无死亡;Ⅱ级32例(10.1%),1例死亡(3.1%);Ⅲ级198例(62.8%),5例死亡(2.5%);Ⅳ级40例(12.7%),1例死亡(2.5%);Ⅴ级14例(4.5%),9例死亡(64.5%).Ⅱ级以上患者在1年内因CAP住院占50%以上.结论慢性基础疾病是老年CAP的重要的危险因素.1年内因CAP住院在CAP的发病和增加其危险度方面起着重要的作用.半数以上的 CAP患者感染的病原不明,表明CAP有效的初始经验治疗十分重要.     

唐山农村地区老年社区获得性肺炎住院患者病原学分析

目的分析唐山农村地区老年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者病原学构成并初步分析合并常见基础疾病的病原体构成。方法选择在唐山市3家三级医院住院的唐山市农村地区老年CAP住院患者359例,分析患者痰培养结果,病原学构成,同时分析合并有常见基础疾病的老年CAP患者的病原学特点。结果 359例老年CAP住院治疗患者中,以革兰氏阴性细菌感染占72.9%,伴COPD、脑血管后遗症、糖尿病的老年CAP患者最常见为肺炎克雷伯杆菌感染,支扩中最常见病原体为铜绿假单胞菌。结论老年CAP住院患者以革兰氏阴性菌感染为主,其伴随的基础疾病影响病原学结果。