Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute coronary syndromes

Acute coronary syndromes are a leading cause of hospitalization in industrialized countries. Current antithrombotic therapy focuses on relatively weak antiplatelet agents and heparin. The advent of inhibitors of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway for aggregation, provides a new therapeutic modality. Clinical trials with a total of more than 18,000 patients have clearly shown the benefits of intravenous IIb/IIIa blockade. Overall, at 30 days, 13 fewer deaths or myocardial infarctions occurred for every 1000 patients treated in these trials. This favorable outcome was extended to 6 months, resulting in 16 fewer such events per 1000 patients treated. Importantly, these benefits were not accompanied by an excessive occurrence in bleeding complications or thrombocytopenia. To further improve outcomes in this high-risk group of patients, strategies pertaining to prolonged periods of vessel passivation with oral formulations and early or delayed invasive approaches are being studied.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors including abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban have been studied extensively as short-term adjuncts to short-term heparin and indefinite aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions on native vessels. The drugs provide a small advantage in the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and need for revascularization at 30 days (1-2% of treated patients) at the expense of an increase in major and potentially fatal bleeding complications (1% of treated patients over heparin plus aspirin alone). Highest-risk patients appear to benefit the most; clopidogrel should also be considered in these patients. Patients undergoing percutaneous interventions on bypass grafts do not benefit. Whether one GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is superior to another is incompletely clarified. Abciximab causes severe immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (<20,000/microl) in 0.7% of cases; this is more often than eptifibatide or tirofiban (0.2%). Pseudothrombocytopenia should be differentiated. Effective use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions requires discerning clinical judgment. The value of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors is not established in other forms of vascular disease.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of platelet activity at the injured coronary plaque is a target for novel therapeutic strategies. One of these mechanisms is the blockade of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, which binds circulating fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor and crosslinks platelets as the final common pathway to platelet aggregation. Intravenous agents directed against this receptor include the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment abciximab, the peptide inhibitor eptifibatide and nonpeptide mimetics tirofiban and lamifiban. RESULTS: During percutaneous coronary intervention, an absolute reduction of 1.5-6.5% in the 30-day risk of death, myocardial infarction or repeat urgent revascularization has been observed, with some variability in treatment effect among the agents tested. Treatment effect is achieved early with every modality of revascularization and maintained over the long-term up to 3 years. Increased bleeding risk may be minimized by reduction and weight adjustment of concomitant heparin dosing. In the acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation, absolute 1.5-3.2% reductions in 30-day rates of death or myocardial infarction have been achieved with 2- to 4-day courses of eptifibatide or tirofiban. Clinical benefit accrues during the period of drug infusion and is durable. Treatment effect may be enhanced among patients undergoing early coronary revascularization, with evidence of stabilization before intervention and suppression of postprocedural ischemic events. CONCLUSION: Thus, blockade of the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor reduces ischemic complications when used as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention or the management of acute ischemic syndromes.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors prevent fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. They decrease ischemic complications associated with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. Meta-analyses of 6 randomized trials of parenteral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes suggest a significant reduction in death and myocardial infarction in high risk patients. These include patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention or those with high TIMI risk score, elevated troponin values, or diabetes mellitus. Despite guideline recommendations supporting therapy for these indications, only a minority of appropriate candidates are being treated. The risk of major bleeding is small; thrombocytopenia can result from abciximab therapy. Optimal dosing strategies continue to evolve.     

Role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndromes

Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes. Three classes of antiplatelet drugs are available in this setting: acetylsalicylic acid, thienopyridines, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. During the last ten years, numerous clinical trials have been conducted in large populations of patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes. Further investigations are in progress. In the light of these results, the respective roles of the different antiplatelet drugs have been more precisely defined, in terms of class preference as well as in terms of the combination of several antiplatelet drugs and of antiplatelet drugs with other therapies, including non fractionated--or low molecular weight--heparin and non-invasive or invasive revascularisation procedures. In the present article, we review the results of the major published or non published trials that addressed the role of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Based on these results, the current therapeutic guidelines for clinical practice issued by the American and European cardiology societies are given in the conclusion, with their level of evidence.     

Controversies surrounding platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndromes

Platelet-dependent thrombosis is an important part of the pathophysiology of both percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Data support the use of acute therapies that interfere with platelets to provide clinical benefit to patients presenting with acute cardiovascular disease. The discovery of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists has been a major advance in the pharmacotherapy for patients undergoing PCI and those presenting with ACS without ST-segment elevation. This article will cover the role of platelets in acute cardiovascular disease, as well as the discovery and development of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. The major focus of this article will be on examining key lessons from the trials in each of these areas as well as presenting a series of questions that still require answers from either ongoing or future research.     

Low-molecular-weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in acute coronary syndromes

Traditional antithrombotic regimens for the management of acute coronary syndromes are far from optimal. There is considerable opportunity for improvement of standard treatment with unfractionated heparin and aspirin. The introduction of new antithrombotic drugs, such as low-molecular-weight heparins(LMWH), and more potent antiplatelet drugs, such as glycoprotein(GP) lIb/llla antagonists, has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes. The complementary anticoagulant/antiplatelet modes of action of LMWHs and GP lIb/Ila antagonists mean that combining these drugs in the medical management of patients with acute coronary syndromes, including those who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention, may offer enhanced clinical benefits. Until recently, there was a lack of clinical data to support this approach, but several recent trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with the LMWH enoxaparin and a GP lIb/Illa antagonist in the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction reflect this new evidence.The combined use of a LMWH and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist should now be viewed as safe and effective in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Definitive efficacy-powered superiority data will be available shortly.     

Intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Over recent years, substantial clinical trial evidence regarding glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for the medical management of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes has been compiled. Despite being recently advocated for the management of coronary instability within widely accepted guidelines, its use among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes remains somewhat contentious. Within randomized placebo-controlled trials, uniform efficacy with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has not been shown, whereas a disturbing excess in adverse events is evident within some trials. Currently, the basis for this heterogeneity of clinical evidence has not been adequately explained. However, evolving insights from clinical trials and basic research have further refined our understanding of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy and the potential effects beyond the inhibition of the fibrinogen receptor. Likewise, appreciation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of these agents provides putative explanations for the diverse findings of the randomized trials. Reexamination of the clinical trial data in light of this recent evidence provides a basis for interpreting the marginal results of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute coronary syndromes. Consideration of these factors may facilitate the optimal clinical application of this class of agents to the management of coronary instability.     

Evaluating the benefits of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in heart failure at baseline in acute coronary syndromes

Background

We evaluated whether the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, in addition to heparin and aspirin, imparts an incremental benefit in a subgroup of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who had congestive heart failure (CHF) symptoms at presentation.

Methods

We analyzed patients enrolled in the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the use of eptifibatide versus placebo for patients with ACS without persistent ST-elevation. We compared the clinical characteristics and 30-day outcomes for 861 patients who had Killip class II or III CHF symptoms with those of 8558 patients who had no CHF symptoms.

Results

Odds ratios for the primary end point, 30-day death or non-fatal myocardial infarction, in the placebo group versus the eptifibatide group were similar for patients with and without CHF (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.8-1.5; odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3). However, adverse events were almost twice as frequent for patients with CHF compared with patients with no CHF (24.5% vs 14%).

Conclusions

Although patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS who have CHF have markedly worse outcomes than patients without CHF symptoms, we did not find an incremental benefit from the use of eptifibatide in this seriously ill subgroup.